Synoptic operative reports enhance documentation of best practices for rectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Implementation of best practices surgical checklists improves patient safety and outcomes. However, documenting performance of these practices can be challenging. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons developed a Best Practices for Rectal Cancer Checklist (RCC) to standardize and improve the quality of rectal cancer surgery. This study compared the degree to which synoptic (SR) and narrative (NR) operative reports document RCC items. METHODS: Two reviewers independently reviewed a cohort of prospectively collected SR for rectal cancer surgery and a case-matched historical cohort of NR. Reports were reviewed for documentation of performance of operative items on the RCC. Abstraction time and inter-rater agreement were also measured. RESULTS: SR scored significantly higher than NR on the overall checklist score (mean adjusted score ± standard deviation 12.4 ± 0.9 vs. 5.7 ± 1.9, maximum possible score 18, P < 0.001). Reviewers abstracted data significantly faster from SR. Inter-rater agreement between reviewers was high for both types of reports. CONCLUSIONS: SR were associated with reliable and more complete and reliable documentation of items on the RCC. Use of an SR system standardizes operative reporting, providing the opportunity to enhance checklist compliance, and enable timely feedback to improve surgical outcomes for rectal cancer patients.

The location of surgical care for rural patients with rectal cancer: patterns of treatment and patient perspectives.

BACKGROUND: Where cancer patients receive surgical care has implications on policy and planning and on patients' satisfaction and outcomes. We conducted a population- based analysis of where rectal cancer patients undergo surgery and a qualitative analysis of rectal cancer patients' perspectives on location of surgical care. METHODS: We reviewed Manitoba Cancer Registry data on patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosed between 2004 and 2006. We interviewed rural patients with rectal cancer regarding their preferences and the factors they considered when deciding on treatment location. Interview data were analyzed using a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: From 2004 to 2006, 2086 patients received diagnoses of CRC in Manitoba (colon: 1578, rectal: 508). Among rural patients (n = 907), those with rectal cancer were more likely to undergo surgery at an urban centre than those with colon cancer (46.5% v. 28.8%, p < 0.001). Twenty rural patients with rectal cancer participated in interviews. We identified 3 major themes from the interview data: the decision-maker, treatment factors and personal factors. Participants described varying input into referral decisions, and often they did not perceive a choice regarding treatment location. Treatment factors, including surgeon factors and hospital factors, were important when considering treatment location. Personal factors, including travel, support, accommodation, finances and employment, also affected participants' treatment experiences. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of rural patients with rectal cancer undergo surgery at urban centres. The reasons are complex and only partly related to patient choice. Further studies are required to better understand cancer system access in geographically dispersed populations and to support cancer patients through the decision-making and treatment processes.

CONTEXTE: Le lieu où les patients atteints du cancer subissent une intervention chirurgicale a des répercussions sur les politiques et la planification, et sur la satisfaction du patient et ses résultats. Nous avons étudié dans une population le lieu où des patients atteints de cancer du rectum subissent leur chirurgie et effectué une analyse qualitative des points de vue exprimés par les patients au sujet du lieu où les soins chirurgicaux sont dispensés. MÉTHODES: Nous avons consulté le Registre du cancer du Manitoba pour trouver des données sur des patients atteints de cancer colorectal diagnostiqué entre 2004 et 2006. Nous avons interviewé des patients de régions rurales atteints de cancer du rectum pour connaître leurs préférences et les facteurs dont ils avaient tenu compte en choisissant le lieu où ils allaient être traités. Nous avons analysé les données recueillies à l'aide d'une méthode théorique fondées sur les faits. RÉSULTATS: Entre 2004 et 2006, au Manitoba, 2086 patients ont reçu un diagnostic de cancer colorectal (cancer du côlon : 1578; cancer du rectum : 508). Parmi les patients qui vivaient en milieu rural (n = 907), ceux atteints d'un cancer du rectum avaient plus tendance à subir leur chirurgie dans un établissement urbain que ceux atteints de cancer du côlon (46,5 % c. 28,8 %, p < 0,001). Vingt patients de milieu rural atteitns de cancer du rectum ont participé aux entrevues. Trois principaux éléments se dégagent des données recueillies : le décideur, des facteurs reliés au traitement et des facteurs d'ordre personnel. Les participants ont décrit diverses contributions qu'ils ont apportées à la décision relative à la référence de leur cas et dit que souvent, ils n'ont pas senti qu'un choix de lieux de traitement leur était offert. Les facteurs liés au traitement lui-même, y compris ceux liés au chirurgien et à l'hôpital, ont été importants dans le choix du lieu de traitement. Les facteurs d'ordre personnel, dont le déplacement, le soutien, l'hébergement, la situation financière et l'emploi ont aussi influé sur l'expérience thérapeutique des participants. CONCLUSION: Une proportion considérable de patients atteints du cancer du rectum et vivant en milieu rural subissent leur chirurgie dans des établissements urbains. Les raisons sont complexes et ne sont qu'en partie reliées au choix du patient. Il faudrait mener d'autres études pour mieux comprendre l'accès aux services offerts aux personnes atteintes de cancer dans les populations géographiquement dispersées et pour les appuyer dans le processus de prise de décision et de traitement.

Documentation of quality of care data for colon cancer surgery: comparison of synoptic and dictated operative reports.

BACKGROUND: Operative reports are a source of clinical data that can, for quality assurance purposes, be used to document the performance of processes that affect the care of surgical patients. We assessed the degree to which synoptic reports document operative quality indicators for colon cancer surgery. METHODS: Two reviewers independently reviewed 80 prospectively collected synoptic colon cancer operative reports and a case-matched historical cohort of 80 dictated reports. Reviewers rated how well reports documented performance of quality of care indicators using two checklists of previously validated, colon cancer-specific quality measures. Interrater agreement and time to extract data were also recorded. RESULTS: Synoptic reports had significantly higher overall scores on the quality indictors in comparison to dictated reports for both checklist 1 [mean adjusted score ± standard deviation 18.6 ± 1.3 vs. 9.2 ± 3.6, p < 0.01 (maximum score 38)] and checklist 2 [2.0 ± 0.3 vs. 1.3 ± 1.1, p < 0.01 (maximum score 3)]. Interrater agreement was significantly higher between synoptic reports for both checklists (data not shown). Data were extracted significantly more quickly from synoptic reports than dictated reports [mean time (minutes:seconds) ± standard deviation 2:32 ± 0:44 vs. 4:01 ± 1:14, p < 0.01]. CONCLUSIONS: Synoptic reports were associated with more complete documentation of quality indicators for colon cancer resection compared to dictated reports. Although synoptic reports may improve the documentation of quality of care data, further refinement may help to better document performance of quality measures and improve reporting standards.

Canadian Association of University Surgeons annual symposium: Continuity of care: Toronto, Ontario, Sep. 6, 2007.

This 2007 symposium of the Canadian Association of University Surgeons brought together surgeons from a number of jurisdictions to discuss the challenges and opportunities that reduced physician work hours will bring to the care of the surgical patient. Dr. Brian Taylor, president of the association, underscored the need to find a balance between the benefits of diminished workloads/work hours and the loss of continuity of care. He opined that Canada needs to learn from our European colleagues' experience. Dr. Per-Olof Nyström, professor of surgery, presented the modern Swedish model of surgical care, which had to be developed as a consequence of the European Union's legal restrictions on the amount of time an individual surgeon may work. Sweden employs a team-based shared-care model driven by the individual surgeon's expertise rather than the "village factory" model of the multiskilled, multitasking approach of surgical care more prevalent in Canada. Dr. Chris de Gara, secretary treasurer of the association, presented the evidence base for (and against) work-hour restrictions and how well-designed systems can ensure effective continuity of care. Dr. Stewart Hamilton illustrated how one such system for the delivery of the emergency general surgical services has evolved at the University of Alberta Hospital, which demonstrated its effectiveness in providing quality surgical continuity of care. Dr. Debrah Wirtzfeld underscored the importance of trainee lifestyle and how modern Web-based technologies can ensure reduced errors with the implementation of a "sign-out" system.

The history of women in surgery.

The history of women in surgery in Western civilization dates to 3500 before common era (BCE) and Queen Shubad of Ur. Ancient history reveals an active role of women in surgery in Egypt, Italy and Greece as detailed in surgical texts of the time. During the middle ages, regulations forbade women from practising surgery unless they assumed their husbands' practices upon their deaths or unless they were deemed fit by a "competent" jury. King Henry VIII proclaimed that "No carpenter, smith, weaver or women shall practise surgery." The modern period of surgery opens with women impersonating men to practise medicine and surgery (Dr. Miranda Stewart). The first female physicians (Dr. Elizabeth Blackwell and Dr. Emily Jennings Stowe) and surgeons (Dr. Mary Edwards Walker and Dr. Jennie Smillie Robertson) in North America found it difficult to obtain residency education after completing medical school. Dr. Jessie Gray was Canada's "First Lady of Surgery" and the first woman to graduate from the Gallie program at the University of Toronto in the 1940s. Currently, the ratio of women in surgical training is far less than that of women in medical school. The reasons that women choose surgery include appropriate role models and intellectual/technical challenge. Lack of mentorship and lifestyle issues are the strongest deterrents. Consideration of a "controllable lifestyle" by surgical administrators will help with the recruitment of women into surgery.

Concordance with clinical practice guidelines for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage I-III colon cancer: experience in 2 Canadian provinces.

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the adjuvant treatment of colorectal cancer were published by the National Institutes of Health in 1991. The American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario have recommended adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer. We evaluated differences in concordance with guidelines in the treatment of patients with stage I-III colon cancer in the Canadian provinces of Newfoundland and Labrador and Ontario. METHODS: We assessed clinical data and treatment from January 1999 to December 2000 for 130 patients from Newfoundland and Labrador and 315 patients from Ontario who had stage I-III colon cancer. The primary outcome was concordance with guidelines for adjuvant treatment. We evaluated factors affecting the use of chemotherapy in patients with stage II disease. RESULTS: No patients received adjuvant therapy for stage I disease. Forty-five of 52 patients (87%) in Newfoundland and Labrador and 108 of 115 patients (94%) in Ontario received adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. Twenty of 55 patients (36%) in Newfoundland and Labrador and 44 of 116 patients (38%) in Ontario received adjuvant therapy for stage II disease. Eighteen of 41 patients (44%) in Newfoundland and Labrador and 30 of 53 patients (57%) in Ontario with high-risk features received adjuvant treatment, which was significantly higher than patients without high-risk features. There was a strong trend toward using chemotherapy in patients with stage II disease who were 50 years or younger, independent of high-risk status. CONCLUSION: Concordance with CPGs for adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer was not optimal. This may reflect selection bias among referring surgeons, a paucity of level-I evidence and the belief that other factors such as age may play a role in predicting outcome.

Practice patterns and career satisfaction of Canadian female general surgeons.

BACKGROUND: We wanted to study how female general surgeons in Canada manage lifestyle and career demands. METHODS: All female Canadian general surgeons registered with the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada were asked to complete a survey evaluating their practice patterns, personal lives, and levels of satisfaction related to these factors. RESULTS: Eighty-five surveys (66%) were returned. Most respondents work in full-time clinical practices. While it was rare to find women in part-time or shared practices, 35% of women reported interest in these alternative models. Respondents described the necessary factors for a transition into alternative models. Job satisfaction was high (3.8 out of 5), with personal and parenting satisfaction being less highly rated (3.3 and 3.2, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Canadian female general surgeons have active and satisfying careers, although many would like to work in alternative practice models that better conform to their lifestyle demands. This pressure will have a significant impact on the future surgical workforce.

Is abdominoperineal resection a good option for stage IV adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum?

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The management of the primary lesion in patients with stage IV adenocarcinoma of the distal rectum is controversial. An abdominoperineal resection (APR) may be a good option. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of 21 patients with stage IV distal rectal adenocarcinoma treated with an APR between January 1991 to December 2000 was performed. RESULTS: All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 and normal preoperative alkaline phosphatase and total bilirubin levels. Twelve patients (92%) with liver metastases had less than 25% of total liver volume involvement. Twenty patients (95%) had complete resolution of their symptoms related to the primary rectal cancer. The median follow-up was 19 months (range 3-92 months), with a median survival of 21.6 months and a 2-year overall survival of 34%. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with stage IV distal rectal adenocarcinoma who have a good performance status, normal preoperative liver function tests, and minimal metastatic disease to the liver can be offered resective surgery.