ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Whereas mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become standard-of-care treatment for patients with salvageable brain tissue after acute stroke caused by large-vessel occlusions, the results of MT in patients with medium-vessel occlusions (MEVOs), particularly in the posterior cerebral artery (PCA), are not well known. METHODS: Using data from the international Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), we assessed presenting characteristics and clinical outcomes for patients who underwent MT for primary occlusions in the P2 PCA segment. As a subanalysis, we compared the PCA MeVO outcomes with STAR's anterior circulation MeVO outcomes, namely middle cerebral artery (MCA) M2 and M3 segments. RESULTS: Of the 9812 patients in STAR, 43 underwent MT for isolated PCA MeVOs. The patients' median age was 69 years (interquartile range 61-79), and 48.8% were female. The median NIH Stroke Scale score was 9 (range 6-17). After recanalization, 67.4% of patients achieved successful recanalization (modified treatment in cerebral infarction score [mTICI] ≥ 2b), with a first-pass success rate of 44.2%, and 39.6% achieved a modified Rankin score of 0-2 at 90 days. Nine patients (20.9%) had died by the 90-day follow-up. In comparison with M2 and M3 MeVOs, there were no differences in presenting characteristics among the three groups. Patients with PCA MeVOs were less likely to undergo intra-arterial thrombolysis (4.7% PCA vs. 10.1% M2 vs. 16.2% M3, p = 0.046) or to achieve successful recanalization (mTICI ≥ 2b, 67.4%, 86.7%, 82.3%, respectively, p < 0.001); however, there were no differences in the rates of successful first-pass recanalization (44.2%, 49.8%, 52.3%, respectively, p = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: We describe the STAR experience performing MT in patients with PCA MeVOs. Our analysis supports that successful first-pass recanalization can be achieved in PCA MEVOs at a rate similar to that in MCA MeVOs, although further study and possible innovation may be necessary to improve successful PCA MeVO recanalization rates.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The definitive impact of onset to arterial puncture time (OPT) on 90-day mortality after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) caused by anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unknown. The present study aimed to evaluate the influence of OPT on 90-day mortality in anterior circulation AIS-LVO patients who underwent EVT. METHODS: Data from 33 international centers were retrospectively analyzed. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to identify a cutoff for OPT. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 6). Secondary outcomes included mortality at discharge, 90-day good outcome (mRS 0-2), 90-day poor outcome (mRS 5-6), successful recanalization (defined as postprocedure modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction scale ≥2b), and intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: A total of 2842 AIS-LVO patients with EVT were included. The cutoff for OPT for 90-day mortality was 180 min. Of these 378 patients had OPT <180 min and 378 patients had OPT ≥180 min in the propensity score-matched cohort (n = 756). Patients with OPT <180 min were less likely to have 90-day mortality (odds ratio [OR] 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.96) and poor outcome (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96), and more likely to have 90-day good outcome (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.16-2.08). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that OPT <180 min was less related to 90-day mortality and poor outcome, and more to 90-day good outcome in AIS-LVO patients who underwent EVT.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The outcomes of endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for medium vessel occlusions (MeVOs) of specific vascular territories remain unknown. We aimed to investigate EVT outcomes by MeVO locations using the data from an ongoing international multicenter registry. METHODS: Patients with isolated MeVO who underwent EVT between January 2013 and December 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Isolated MeVO was defined as an occlusion of the A2 or A3 (A2/A3), M2 or M3, and P2 or P3 (P2/P3). Outcomes included a 90-day modified Rankin score (mRS) of 0-2, successful recanalization (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2b), early neurological deterioration (END) or improvement (ENI), and 90-day mortality. END was defined as a worsening of ≥4 points from the baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score within 24 h of EVT, while ENI was defined as an improvement of ≥4 points from the baseline NIHSS score within 24 h of EVT. RESULTS: 1744 MeVOs included. Compared to M2 occlusions (n = 1542, 88.4%), A2/A3 (n = 36, 2.1%) occlusions had lower odds of 90-day mRS 0-2 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.11-0.80), and P2/P3 occlusions (n = 49, 2.8%) had lower odds of successful recanalization (aOR 0.19, 95% CI 0.07-0.50), and higher odds of END (aOR 3.53, 95% CI 1.35-9.25). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: A2/A3 occlusions were more likely to have worse outcomes compared to M2 occlusions after EVT for patients with isolated MeVOs.
Subject(s)
Endovascular Procedures , Thrombectomy , Humans , Male , Female , Thrombectomy/methods , Aged , Endovascular Procedures/methods , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Registries , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare outcomes of low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) patients with stroke who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) within 6 hours or 6 to 24 hours after stroke onset. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from a large multicenter international registry from 2013 to 2023. Patients with low ASPECTS (2-5) who underwent MT for anterior circulation intracranial large vessel occlusion were included. A propensity matching analysis was conducted for patients presented in the early (<6 hours) vs late (6-24 hours) time window after symptom onset or last known normal. RESULTS: Among the 10 229 patients who underwent MT, 274 met the inclusion criteria. 122 (44.5%) patients were treated in the late window. Early window patients were older (median age, 74 years [IQR, 63-80] vs 66.5 years [IQR, 54-77]; P < .001), had lower proportion of female patients (40.1% vs 54.1%; P = .029), higher median admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (20 [IQR, 16-24] vs 19 [IQR, 14-22]; P = .004), and a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (46.1% vs 27.3; P = .002). Propensity matching yielded a well-matched cohort of 84 patients in each group. Comparing the matched cohorts showed there was no significant difference in acceptable outcomes at 90 days between the 2 groups (odds ratio = 0.90 [95% CI = 0.47-1.71]; P = .70). However, the rate of symptomatic ICH was significantly higher in the early window group compared with the late window group (odds ratio = 2.44 [95% CI = 1.06-6.02]; P = .04). CONCLUSION: Among patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion and low ASPECTS, MT seems to provide a similar benefit to functional outcome for patients presenting <6 hours or 6 to 24 hours after onset.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) are strongly correlated with successful recanalization, traditionally defined as modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) ≥2b. This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS; 2-5) who achieved mTICI 2b versus those who achieved mTICI 2c/3 after MT. METHODS: This study utilized data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR), which combined databases from 32 thrombectomy-capable stroke centers between 2013 and 2023. The study included only patients with low ASPECTS who achieved mTICI 2b, 2c, or 3 after MT for internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (M1) stroke. RESULTS: Of the 10,229 patients who underwent MT, 234 met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 98 (41.9%) achieved mTICI 2b, and 136 (58.1%) achieved mTICI 2c/3. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The 90-day favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score: 0-3) was significantly better in the mTICI 2c/3 group than in the mTICI 2b group (adjusted odds ratio 2.35; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-4.81; P=0.02). Binomial logistic regression revealed that achieving mTICI 2c/3 was significantly associated with higher odds of a favorable 90-day outcome (odds ratio 2.14; 95% CI 1.07-4.41; P=0.04). CONCLUSION: In patients with low ASPECTS, achieving an mTICI 2c/3 score after MT is associated with a more favorable 90-day outcome. These findings suggest that mTICI 2c/3 is a better target for MT than mTICI 2b in patients with low ASPECTS.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The influence of Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) on outcomes following mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with low ASPECTS remains unknown. In this study, we compared the outcomes of AIS patients treated with MT for large vessel occlusion (LVO) categorized by ASPECTS value. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis involving 305 patients with AIS caused by LVO, defined as the occlusion of the internal carotid artery and/or the M1 segments of the middle cerebral artery, stratified into two groups: ASPECTS 2-3 and 4-5. The primary outcome was favorable outcome defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-3. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0-2, 90-day mortality, any intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and symptomatic ICH (sICH). We performed multivariable logistic regression analysis to evaluate the impact of ASPECTS 2-3 vs. 4-5 on outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients (19.3%) had ASPECTS 2-3 and 246 (80.7%) had ASPECTS 4-5. Favorable outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]= 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-2.41, p=0.80). There were also no significant differences in 90-day mRS 0-2 (aOR= 1.65, 95% CI: 0.66-3.99, p=0.30), 90-day mortality (aOR= 1.14, 95% CI: 0.58-2.20, p=0.70), any ICH (aOR= 0.54, 95% CI: 0.28-1.00, p=0.06), and sICH (aOR= 0.70, 95% CI: 0.27-1.63, p = 0.40) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: AIS patients with LVO undergoing MT with ASPECTS 2-3 had similar outcomes compared to ASPECTS 4-5.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Ischemic Stroke/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Alberta , Thrombectomy/adverse effects , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/diagnostic imaging , Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , Cerebral Hemorrhage/etiology , Treatment Outcome , Brain Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Brain Ischemia/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Mechanical thrombectomy failure (MTF) occurs in approximately 15% of cases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate factors that predict MTF. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry. Patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for large vessel occlusion (LVO) were included. Patients were categorized by mechanical thrombectomy success (MTS) (≥mTICI 2b) or MTF (Subject(s)
Aneurysm
, Brain Ischemia
, Stroke
, Humans
, Stroke/surgery
, Thrombectomy/methods
, Cerebral Hemorrhage
, Retrospective Studies
, Registries
, Treatment Outcome
, Brain Ischemia/therapy
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Hemorrhagic stroke, particularly occurring from ruptured cerebrovascular malformations, is responsible for 5-12% of all maternal deaths during pregnancy and the puerperium. Whether endovascular treatment is feasible and safe for both the mother and the fetus, is still a matter of debate. The main objective of this case series and systematic review was to share our multi-institutional experience and to assess the feasibility and safety of endovascular treatment during pregnancy, as well as the corresponding maternal and fetal outcomes based on currently available evidence. METHODS: We report a case series of 12 pregnant women presenting with hemorrhagic stroke from ruptured cerebrovascular arteriovenous malformations or aneurysms who underwent endovascular treatment prior to delivery. A systematic literature review of pregnant patients with endovascular treated cerebrovascular malformations, published between 1995 and 2022, was performed. Clinical patient information, detailed treatment strategies, maternal and fetal outcomes as well as information on the delivery were collected and assessed. RESULTS: In most patients the course was uneventful and an excellent outcome without significant neurological deficits (mRS ≤â¯1) was achieved. Furthermore, the maternal outcome was not worse compared to the general population who underwent endovascular treatment of ruptured vascular brain lesions. Also, in most cases a healthy fetus was born. CONCLUSION: Endovascular treatment of ruptured cerebrovascular malformations during pregnancy is safe and feasible regarding both aspects, the maternal and fetal outcomes. Still, a stronger knowledge base is needed to correctly approach future cases of intracranial hemorrhage in the pregnant population.
Subject(s)
Aneurysm, Ruptured , Cerebrovascular Disorders , Embolization, Therapeutic , Endovascular Procedures , Hemorrhagic Stroke , Intracranial Aneurysm , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Intracranial Aneurysm/therapy , Hemorrhagic Stroke/therapy , Cerebrovascular Disorders/therapy , Hemorrhage , Intracranial Hemorrhages , Aneurysm, Ruptured/diagnostic imaging , Aneurysm, Ruptured/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/complications , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/diagnostic imaging , Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations/therapyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) is the standard of care for large vessel occlusion(LVO) stroke. Data on technical and clinical outcome in proximal medium vessel occlusions(pMeVOs) comparing frontline techniques remain limited. METHODS: We report an international multicenter retrospective study of patients undergoing EVT for stroke at 32 centers between 2015-2021. Patients were divided into LVOs(ICA/M1/Vertebrobasilar) or pMeVOs(M2/A1/P1) and categorized by thrombectomy technique. Primary outcome was 90-day good functional outcome(mRS ≤ 2). Multivariate logistic regressions were used to evaluate the impact of technical variables on clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was used to compare outcome in patients with pMeVO treated with aspiration versus stent-retriever. RESULTS: In the cohort of 5977 LVO and 1287 pMeVO patients, pMeVO did not independently predict good-outcome(p = 0.55). In pMeVO patients, successful recanalization irrespective of frontline technique(aOR = 3.2,p < 0.05), procedure time ≤ 1-h(aOR = 2.2,p < 0.05), and thrombectomy attempts ≤ 4(aOR = 2.8,p < 0.05) were independent predictors of good-outcomes.In a propensity-matched cohort of aspiration versus stent-retriever pMeVO patients, there was no difference in good-outcomes. The rates of hemorrhage were higher(9%vs.4%,p < 0.01) and procedure time longer(51-min vs. 33-min,p < 0.01) with stent-retriever, while the number of attempts was higher with aspiration(2.5vs.2,p < 0.01). Rates of hemorrhage and good-outcome showed an exponential relationship to procedural metrics, and were more dependent on time in the aspiration group compared to attempts in the stent-retriever group. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes following EVT for pMeVO are comparable to those in LVOs. The golden hour or 3-pass rules in LVO thrombectomy still apply to pMeVO thrombectomy. Different techniques may exhibit different futility metrics; SR thrombectomy was more influenced by attempts whereas aspiration was more dependent on procedure time.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a shift to virtual residency interviews for the 2020-2021 neurosurgery match, with unknown implications for stakeholders. This study seeks to analyze the perceptions of residency program directors (PDs) and associate program directors (APDs) regarding the current virtual format used for residency selection and interviews. METHODS: An anonymous, 30-question survey was constructed and sent to 115 neurosurgery PDs and 26 APDs to assess respondent demographics, factors used to review applicants, perceptions of applicants and applicant engagement, perceptions of standardized letters and interview questions, the effect of the virtual interview format on various stakeholders, and the future outlook for the virtual residency interview format. RESULTS: A total of 38 PDs and APDs completed this survey, constituting a response rate of 27.0%. Survey respondents received significantly more Electronic Residency Application Service applications in the 2020-2021 cycle compared with the 2019-2020 cycle (P = 0.0029). Subinternship performance by home-rotators, (26.3%), letters of recommendation (23.7%), and Step 1 score (18.4%) were ranked as the most important factors for evaluating candidates during the current virtual application cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights that applicants applied to a greater number of residency programs compared with years prior, that the criteria used by PDs/APDs to evaluate applicants remained largely consistent compared to previous years, and that the virtual residency interview format may disproportionately disadvantage Doctor of Osteopathic medicine and international medical graduate applicants. Further exploring attitudes toward signaling mechanisms and standardized letters may serve to inform changes to future neurosurgery match cycles.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Education, Distance , Internship and Residency , Neurosurgery/education , Pandemics , School Admission Criteria/trends , Humans , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Epidural disease closer than 3 mm from the spinal cord is sometimes regarded as a contraindication to spine radiosurgery (SRS) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Current guidelines on the management of high-grade epidural disease recommend surgical decompression followed by conventionally fractionated external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or post-operative SBRT [1, 2]. For patients with high-grade epidural disease who are medically inoperable, conventional EBRT is typically recommended, even though clinical response rates are lower and durability is limited[3]. A few expert centers use decompressive SRS in a single fraction for high-grade epidural disease[4, 5], but this technique has not been incorporated into treatment algorithms such as the neurologic, oncologic, mechanical, and systemic (NOMS) decision framework [1, 2]. Here we present a case where five-fraction SBRT followed by immunotherapy resulted in a complete radiographic and clinical response for a patient with epidural disease that was compressing the thecal sac. We compare the radiographic response in this patient to data in a prior publication that quantified the improvement in thecal sac patency after decompressive SRS, and we suggest that current treatment algorithms need to be updated in the era of immunotherapy.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Neurosurgery seeks to attract the best and brightest medical students; however, there is often a lack of early exposure to the field, among other possible barriers. The authors sought to identify successful practices that can be implemented to improve medical student recruitment to neurosurgery. METHODS: United States neurosurgery residency program directors were surveyed to determine the number of medical student rotators and medical students matching into a neurosurgery residency from their programs between 2010 and 2016. Program directors were asked about the ways their respective institutions integrated medical students into departmental clinical and research activities. RESULTS: Complete responses were received from 30/110 institutions. Fifty-two percent of the institutions had neurosurgery didactic lectures for 1st- and 2nd-year medical students (MS1/2), and 87% had didactics for MS3/4. Seventy-seven percent of departments had a neurosurgery interest group, which was the most common method used to integrate medical students into the department. Other forms of outreach included formal mentorship programs (53%), lecture series (57%), and neurosurgery anatomy labs (40%). Seventy-three percent of programs provided research opportunities to medical students, and 57% indicated that the schools had a formal research requirement. On average, 3 medical students did a rotation in each neurosurgery department and 1 matched into neurosurgery each year. However, there was substantial variability among programs. Over the 2010-2016 period, the responding institutions matched as many as 4% of the graduating class into neurosurgery per year, whereas others matched 0%-1%. Departments that matched a greater (≥ 1% per year) number of medical students into neurosurgery were significantly more likely to have a neurosurgery interest group and formal research requirements. A greater percentage of high-matching programs had neurosurgery mentorship programs, lecture series, and cadaver training opportunities compared to the other institutions. CONCLUSIONS: In recent decades, the number of applicants to neurosurgery has decreased. A major deterrent may be the delayed exposure of medical students to neurosurgery. Institutions with early preclinical exposure, active neurosurgery interest groups, research opportunities, and strong mentorship recruit and match more students into neurosurgery. Implementing such initiatives on a national level may increase the number of highly qualified medical students pursuing neurosurgery.
ABSTRACT
Once the accepted norm during Harvey Cushing's time, the mantra of work to the exclusion of family and lifestyle is now recognized as deleterious to overall well-being. A number of neurosurgical residency training programs have implemented wellness programs to enhance the physical, mental, and emotional well-being of trainees and faculty. This manuscript highlights existing organized wellness education within neurosurgery residency programs in order to describe the motivations behind development, structure, and potential implementation strategies, cost of implementation, and identify successes and barriers in the integration process. This manuscript is designed to serve as a "how-to" guide for other programs who may identify a need in their own trainees and begins the discussion of how to develop wellness, leadership, grit, and resiliency within our future generation of neurosurgeons.
Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Mental Health/education , Neurosurgeons/psychology , Neurosurgery/education , Neurosurgery/psychology , Humans , Internship and ResidencyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Women represent a growing cohort of US neurosurgeons. OBJECTIVE: To describe postresidency fellowship, practice environment, and updated academic rank among female neurosurgeons. METHODS: Databases from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) from 1964 to 2013 were reviewed for female neurosurgery residency graduates. Data on postresidency fellowships, practice environment (private vs academic), academic rank, board certification, and AANS/CNS (Congress of Neurological Surgeons) Joint Section on Women in Neurosurgery (WINS) membership were collected in 2016. Academic rank was verified from program websites and electronic correspondence. Faculty members were asked to report directorships and tenure. The AANS/CNS Joint Section on Women in Neurosurgery verified WINS membership. RESULTS: A total of 379 female neurosurgery residency graduates were identified in this 50-yr span. Of these, 70% became ABNS certified, and 2.1% left neurosurgery. Twenty-seven percent of women (n = 103) pursued fellowships, with pediatric neurosurgery (33%) the most common. Regarding practice environment, 26% entered academic medicine (n = 91), with 42 at the rank of assistant professor, 33 at the rank of associate professor, and 16 reaching the rank of full professor. CONCLUSION: Upon completion of training, 27% of women pursue fellowships. The distribution of women in private vs academic practice environments is proportionate to male neurosurgeons; however, the number women in academic leadership positions remains exceedingly low, with disproportionate representation in higher academic ranks. Women in national organized neurosurgery are increasing. Tracking the career paths of women in neurosurgery is a necessary step to identifying current achievements and opportunities for future progress.
Subject(s)
Career Choice , Neurosurgery/education , Physicians, Women , Certification , Databases, Factual , Faculty , Female , Humans , Internship and Residency , Neurosurgeons , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE Recently, 2 surgeon rating websites (Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica) were published to allow the public to compare surgeons through identifying surgeon volume and complication rates. Among neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, only cervical and lumbar spine, hip, and knee procedures were included in this assessment. METHODS The authors examined the methodology of each website to assess potential sources of inaccuracy. Each online tool was queried for reports on neurosurgeons specializing in spine surgery and orthopedic surgeons specializing in spine, hip, or knee surgery. Surgeons were chosen from top-ranked hospitals in the US, as recorded by a national consumer publication ranking system, within the fields of neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery. The results were compared for accuracy and surgeon representation, and the results of the 2 websites were also compared. RESULTS The methodology of each site was found to have opportunities for bias and limited risk adjustment. The end points assessed by each site were actually not complications, but proxies of complication occurrence. A search of 510 surgeons (401 orthopedic surgeons [79%] and 109 neurosurgeons [21%]) showed that only 28% and 56% of surgeons had data represented on Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica, respectively. There was a significantly higher chance of finding surgeon data on ProPublica (p < 0.001). Of the surgeons from top-ranked programs with data available, 17% were quoted to have high complication rates, 13% with lower volume than other surgeons, and 79% had a 3-star out of 5-star rating. There was no significant correlation found between the number of stars a surgeon received on Consumers' Checkbook and his or her adjusted complication rate on ProPublica. CONCLUSIONS Both the Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica websites have significant methodological issues. Neither site assessed complication occurrence, but rather readmissions or prolonged length of stay. Risk adjustment was limited or nonexistent. A substantial number of neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons from top-ranked hospitals have no ratings on either site, or have data that suggests they are low-volume surgeons or have higher complication rates. Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica produced different results with little correlation between the 2 websites in how surgeons were graded. Given the significant methodological issues, incomplete data, and lack of appropriate risk stratification of patients, the featured websites may provide erroneous information to the public.
Subject(s)
Internet , Neurosurgeons , Orthopedic Surgeons , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Hip Joint/surgery , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Length of Stay , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects , Neurosurgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Orthopedic Procedures/adverse effects , Orthopedic Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications , RiskSubject(s)
Career Choice , Internship and Residency , Neurosurgery/education , Physicians, Women , Female , Humans , MaleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Women compose a minority of neurosurgery residents, averaging just over 10% of matched applicants per year during this decade. A recent review by Lynch et al. raises the concern that women may be at a higher risk than men for attrition, based on analysis of a cohort matched between 1990 and 1999. This manuscript aims to characterize the trends in enrollment, attrition, and postattrition careers for women who matched in neurosurgery between 2000 and 2009. METHODS: Databases from the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) were analyzed for all residents who matched into neurosurgery during the years 2000-2009. Residents were sorted by female gender, matched against graduation records, and if graduation was not reported from neurosurgery residency programs, an Internet search was used to determine the residents' alternative path. The primary outcome was to determine the number of women residents who did not complete neurosurgery training programs during 2000-2009. Secondary outcomes included the total number of women who matched into neurosurgery per year, year in training in which attrition occurred, and alternative career paths that these women chose to pursue. RESULTS: Women comprised 240 of 1992 (12%) matched neurosurgery residents during 2000-2009. Among female residents there was a 17% attrition rate, compared with a 5.3% male attrition rate, with an overall attrition rate of 6.7%. The majority who left the field did so within the first 3 years of neurosurgical training and stayed in medicine--pursuing anesthesia, neurology, and radiology. CONCLUSIONS: Although the percentage of women entering neurosurgical residency has continued to increase, this number is still disproportionate to the overall number of women in medicine. The female attrition rate in neurosurgery in the 2000-2009 cohort is comparable to that of the other surgical specialties, but for neurosurgery, there is disparity between the male and female attrition rates. Women who left the field tended to stay within medicine and usually pursued a neuroscience-related career. Given the need for talented women to pursue neurosurgery and the increasing numbers of women matching annually, the recruitment and retention of women in neurosurgery should be benchmarked and assessed.