Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 73
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38967295

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Critical components of the nasal endoscopic examination have not been definitively established for either the normal examination or for clinical disorders. This study aimed to identify concordance among rhinologists regarding the importance of examination findings for various nasal pathologies. STUDY DESIGN: A consortium of 19 expert rhinologists across the United States was asked to rank the importance of findings on nasal endoscopy for 5 different sinonasal symptom presentations. SETTING: An online questionnaire was distributed in July 2023. METHODS: The questionnaire utilized JotForm® software and featured 5 cases with a set of 4 identical questions per case, each covering a common indication for nasal endoscopy. Rankings were synthesized into Normalized Attention Scores (NASs) and Weighted Normalized Attention Scores (W-NASs) to represent the perceived importance of each feature, scaled from 0 to 1. RESULTS: General concordance was found for examination findings on nasal endoscopy within each case. The perceived features of importance differed between cases based on clinical presentation. For instance, in evaluating postnasal drip, the middle meatus was selected as the most important structure to examine (NAS, 0.73), with mucus selected as the most important abnormal finding (W-NAS, 0.66). The primary feature of interest for mucus was whether it was purulent or not (W-NAS, 0.67). Similar analyses were performed for features in each case. CONCLUSION: The implicit framework existing among rhinologists may help standardize examinations and improve diagnostic accuracy, augment the instruction of trainees, and inform the development of artificially intelligent algorithms to enhance clinical decision-making during nasal endoscopy.

2.
Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol ; 9(4): e1299, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39015551

ABSTRACT

A novel bioresorbable agent on the market is PuraGel® (3-D Matrix, Tokyo, Japan), a RADA-16 product that acts as a synthetic hemostatic and space-filling gel that promotes wound healing and prevents adhesion formation. Given the reported benefits of accelerated wound healing and scar tissue prevention, there are multiple otolaryngologic applications where RADA-16 might improve outcomes. Our study highlights current utilization and associated post-operative complications with this product.

3.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 38(4): 230-236, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38584418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The goals of this study were to understand the trends in recent and past rhinology fellows concerning their demographics, goals, and experiences. METHODS: An anonymous web-based survey was sent to graduates of the 35 rhinology fellowship programs. The survey included questions regarding the scope of practice, research contribution, societal involvement, fellow satisfaction with training, and current practice patterns. Chi-square testing and logistic regression were used to compare variables across cohorts: 0-5 years versus 6+ years from fellowship graduation, gender, and practice settings. RESULTS: Based on 171 respondents, we found no significant differences in 0-5 versus 6+ year graduates in their desire for an academic job post-fellowship. However, those who graduated 6+ years ago had significantly more success securing one (74% vs 96%, P = 0.004). Between males and females, there were no differences in goal of obtaining an academic job or success in obtaining an academic career. Females were more likely to report they attend academic society meetings regularly. Female rhinologists also reported less satisfaction with overall work-life balance and decreased satisfaction with clinical practice. Physicians in academic settings have poorer work-life balance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that finding an academic job may be more difficult for recent rhinology fellowship graduates, although still very possible for the majority of graduates. Understanding the reason for these changes may provide insight to current rhinology fellowship directors and trainees interested in pursuing fellowship training.


Subject(s)
Fellowships and Scholarships , Otolaryngology , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Humans , Female , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Otolaryngology/education , Societies, Medical , Job Satisfaction , Work-Life Balance , Adult
4.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(6): 625-627, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38491860

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Fungal tissue invasion in the setting of sinonasal malignancy has been rarely described in the literature. Only a handful of studies have discussed cases of suspected chronic and acute IFS (CIFS and AIFS, respectively), having an underlying undifferentiated sinonasal carcinoma, sinonasal teratocarcinosarcoma, and NK/T-cell lymphoma. METHODS: Here, we describe 3 cases of carcinoma mimicking IFS from a single institution. RESULTS: Each of our patients presented with sinonasal complaints as an outpatient in the setting of immunosuppression. Intranasal biopsies consistently were predominated by necrotic debris, with and without fungal elements, ultimately leading to a delay of oncologic care. The final pathologies included NK/T-cell lymphoma and SNEC. All patients were followed by radiation and chemotherapy, with 1 case of mortality. CONCLUSIONS: We aim to emphasize the importance of obtaining viable tissue as pathology specimens as the presence of necrosis with fungal elements may limit the diagnosis and ultimately delay the care of an underlying sinonasal carcinoma.


Subject(s)
Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms , Sinusitis , Humans , Diagnosis, Differential , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/microbiology , Male , Middle Aged , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Paranasal Sinus Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Aged , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnosis , Carcinoma/diagnosis , Carcinoma/pathology , Biopsy , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Maxillary Sinus Neoplasms
5.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 38(4): 218-222, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38544439

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Obtaining insurance approval is a necessary component of healthcare in the United States and denials of these claims have been estimated to result in a loss of 3% to 5% of revenue. OBJECTIVE: Examine the trends in insurance denials for rhinological procedures. METHODS: A retrospective review of deidentified financial data of patients who were treated by participating physicians across 3 institutions from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2023. The data was queried for rhinological and non-rhinological procedures via CPT codes. Cumulative insurance denials were calculated and stratified by procedure and insurance type. Write-offs were dollar amounts associated with final denials. RESULTS: A sample of 102,984 procedures and visits revealed a final denial rate between 2.2% and 2.9% across institutions (p = .72). The top three rhinological procedures for final write-offs were: nasal endoscopy (16.24%, $111,836.87), nasal debridement or polypectomy (6.48%, $79,457.51), and destruction of intranasal lesion (2.11%, $56,932.20). The write-off percentage for each procedure was highest among commercial insurance payers as opposed to Medicare or Medicaid. CONCLUSION: Final denial rates of rhinology procedures ranged between 2% and 3%. Common procedures such as nasal endoscopy and nasal debridement are among the highest written-off procedures. Insurance denials can lead to notable revenue loss. Rhinology practices must continue to remain knowledgeable of the changes and effects of insurance reimbursement on their practice.


Subject(s)
Otolaryngology , Humans , United States , Retrospective Studies , Otolaryngology/economics , Medicare/economics , Endoscopy/economics , Endoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics
6.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(5): 485-489, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38344993

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Commonly used endoscopic nasal polyp grading scales have been shown to correlate poorly with symptom scores and quality of life metrics. The recently described Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS) is a grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities by describing incremental recurrence in relation to the surgically opened sinus cavities. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine if the POPS correlated with sinonasal symptoms. METHODS: CRSwNP patients were prospectively administered SNOT-22 questionnaires and graded according to the POPS starting at their 1-month postoperative appointments. Total POPS scores (sum of each side) and Max POPS score (larger value of left and right) were correlated with SNOT-22 total scores and subdomains using Kendall correlation testing. RESULTS: A total of 127 patients were enrolled in the study. Both Total POPS or Max POPS were significantly correlated to the SNOT-22 total score (P < .001, P < .001), Rhinologic (P < .001, P < .001), Extra-Nasal Rhinologic (P < .001, P < .001), Ear/Facial (P < .001, P < .001), and Psychologic (P = .028, P = .017) subdomains. Kendall's tau indicated strong correlation (≥0.3) with Rhinologic subdomain, moderate correlation (.21-.29) with Extra-Nasal Rhinologic and Ear/Facial subdomains, and weak correlation (.1-.19) with Psychologic subdomain. CONCLUSION: Previous endoscopic nasal polyp grading scales poorly correlate with symptoms and patient reported outcome measures. The new POPS moderately correlates with the total SNOT-22 score and strongly correlates with the Rhinologic subdomain, indicating that it may have good potential as a tool to evaluate postoperative CRSwNP patients.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Sinusitis/surgery , Nasal Polyps/diagnosis , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/surgery , Chronic Disease , Endoscopy
7.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(5): 495-502, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38380629

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Chronic rhinosinusitis and related rhinologic disorders are common in routine otolaryngologic practice. Common presenting symptoms include nasal obstruction, facial pain, facial pressure, headache, and a subjective feeling of the face feeling "swollen," a perceptual distortion. No validated scale exists to assess facial pain in addition to perceptual distortion or headache. The objective was to develop a novel scale for assessment of facial symptoms experienced by patients presenting for rhinologic evaluation. METHODS: This was a prospective validation cross-sectional study. A patient questionnaire, the 12-item Facial Complaints Evaluation Scale (FaCES-12), was created to evaluate facial symptoms based on clinical experience and the literature, including severity and timing of facial pain, facial pressure, facial perceptual swelling, and headache. Each item was assessed utilizing an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10 in severity. Data was collected prospectively from 210 patients in 1 private and 2 academic otolaryngologic practices from August to December 2019 along with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a and 22-Item Sino-nasal Outcome Test. Construct validity was determined using Pearson correlation and exploratory factor analysis. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and assessing test-retest scores. RESULTS: A new 12-item scale named FaCES-12 was developed. FaCES-12 demonstrated high reliability with a Cronbach's alpha of .94 and high test-retest reliability (r = .90). The scale revealed very strong correlation with the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale 3a (r = .81) and moderate correlation with the Sino-nasal Outcome Test (r = .48). Exploratory factor analysis demonstrated the scale contained interrelated variables that measured unique components of facial sensations. CONCLUSION: The FaCES-12 is a valid and reliable instrument for use in the evaluation of facial symptoms. Further research into the application of this scale is warranted.


Subject(s)
Sinusitis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Cross-Sectional Studies , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Headache/diagnosis , Headache/etiology , Facial Pain/diagnosis , Facial Pain/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires , Psychometrics
8.
Laryngoscope ; 134(2): 645-647, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37681943

ABSTRACT

An adolescent male presented with orthostatic headaches following head trauma. MRI showed cerebellar tonsil displacement and a bony defect in the clival skull base. Digital subtraction myelography (DSM) confirmed a cerebrospinal fluid-venous fistula (CVF). This was repaired endoscopically. CVFs cause uncontrolled flow of CSF into the venous system resulting in symptoms of intracranial hypotension. They're often difficult to identify on initial imaging. This is the first reported CVF originating in the central skull base, and the first treated via endoscopic trans-nasal approach. CVFs may elude initial imaging, making DSM crucial for unexplained spontaneous intracranial hypotension. Laryngoscope, 134:645-647, 2024.


Subject(s)
Fistula , Intracranial Hypotension , Adolescent , Humans , Male , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/diagnostic imaging , Cerebrospinal Fluid Leak/etiology , Intracranial Hypotension/diagnosis , Intracranial Hypotension/etiology , Intracranial Hypotension/surgery , Skull Base/diagnostic imaging , Cranial Fossa, Posterior , Fistula/complications
9.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 133(4): 454-457, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142357

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Among patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), gender differences in epidemiology as well as quality of life have been reported. However, whether gender differences in endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) preoperative concerns exist is unclear. METHODS: CRS patients undergoing ESS at 3 tertiary care centers in Los Angeles completed the validated Western Surgical Concern Inventory - ESS assessing ESS preoperative concerns. RESULTS: Of the 75 patients included, female patients expressed greater concern than male patients in regard to nasal packing, undergoing anesthesia, impact of surgery on daily activities, and pain and discomfort following surgery. CONCLUSION: This study suggests there are gender differences in ESS preoperative concerns and otolaryngologists should be aware of these possible concerns during preoperative discussions.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Rhinitis , Rhinosinusitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Male , Female , Sex Factors , Quality of Life , Rhinitis/surgery , Rhinitis/epidemiology , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/epidemiology , Endoscopy , Chronic Disease , Treatment Outcome
10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37933596

ABSTRACT

KEY POINTS: Hispanic-American patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps have a comparable level of tissue eosinophilia compared to their Caucasian counterparts in the United States. Mixed inflammation involving both neutrophils and eosinophils is more common in this population compared to Caucasians. Findings from this study may indicate that Hispanic-American patients have a unique endotype or endotypes that deserves further investigation.

11.
J Neurol Surg Rep ; 84(4): e144-e145, 2023 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38026146

ABSTRACT

Chondrosarcoma is a type of an endochondral bone malignancy that is primarily treated surgically with radiation therapy used in the adjuvant setting or in cases of unresectable disease. Proton therapy has potential advantages compared with traditional photon therapy for the treatment of tumors in close proximity to critical structures due to the theoretic lower exit dose. Studies have shown improved survival in patients with skull base chondrosarcoma who undergo proton therapy. However, there is a lack of randomized data. Further studies are needed to define the role of proton therapy in the treatment of skull base chondrosarcoma.

12.
Ear Nose Throat J ; : 1455613231191020, 2023 Aug 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37605484

ABSTRACT

Acoustic neuromas are the most common tumor of the cerebellopontine angle that are associated with a number of symptoms that negatively impact a patient's quality of life. While the mainstay of treatment for these benign tumors remains microsurgical resection, there is limited research exploring how certain modifiable risk factors (MRFs) may affect the perioperative course. The purpose of this study was to investigate how MRFs including malnutrition, obesity, dyslipidemia, uncontrolled hypertension, and smoking may affect postoperative rates of readmission and nonroutine discharges. We utilized the 2016 and 2017 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Readmissions Database. MRFs were queried using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) coding for categories including malnutrition, obesity, dyslipidemia, smoking, alcohol, and hypertension. The statistical analysis was done using RStudio (Version 1.3.959). Chi-squared tests were done to evaluate differences between categorical variables. The Mann-Whitney U-testing was utilized to evaluate for statistically significant differences in continuous data. The "Epitools" package was used to develop logistic regression models for postoperative complications and post hoc receiver operating characteristic curves were developed. Pertaining to nonroutine discharge, predictive models using malnutrition outperformed all other MRFs as well as those with no MRFs (P < .05). In the case of readmission, models using malnutrition outperformed those of obesity and smoking (P < .05). Again, an increase in predictive power is seen in models using dyslipidemia when compared to obesity, smoking, or uncontrolled hypertension. Lastly, models using no MRFs outperformed those of obesity, smoking, and uncontrolled hypertension (P < .05). This is the first study of its kind to evaluate the role of MRFs in those undergoing surgical resection of their acoustic neuroma. We concluded that certain MRFs may play a role in complicating a patient's perioperative surgical course.

13.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(12): 1584-1589, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37226723

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sphenoid and frontal sinuses have narrow ostia and are prone to stenosis. However, their relative rates of patency are not well established, and descriptive rates of sphenoid stenosis have never been reported. The objective is to measure the patency of the sphenoid and frontal sinus ostia postoperatively. METHODS: A prospective multi-institutional cohort study was performed. Ostial patency was measured at surgery and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Pertinent clinical history such as the presence of nasal polyps and prior history of ESS as well as the use of steroid eluting stents were recorded. Overall stenosis rates were calculated for both the sphenoid and frontal sinuses, and Wilcoxon-Signed Rank Test was used to compare intraoperative and postoperative ostial areas. Factorial Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was performed to determine effects of 5 clinical factors. RESULTS: Fifty patients were included. The mean sphenoid sinus ostial area decreased 42.2% in size from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (T0 55.2 ± 28.7 mm vs T3 m 31.8 ± 25.5 mm, P < .001). The mean frontal sinus ostial area decreased 39.8% in size from baseline to 3 months postoperatively (T0 33.7 ± 17.2 mm vs T3 m 19.9 ± 15.1 mm, P < .001). Neither the sphenoid nor the frontal sinus ostial patency demonstrated statistically significant change from 3 to 6 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Both sphenoid and frontal sinus ostia routinely narrow postoperatively, predominately from baseline to 3 months. These findings can serve as a reference for both clinical outcomes and future studies of these surgeries.


Subject(s)
Frontal Sinus , Rhinitis , Humans , Frontal Sinus/diagnostic imaging , Frontal Sinus/surgery , Sphenoid Sinus/surgery , Prospective Studies , Constriction, Pathologic , Cohort Studies , Endoscopy , Chronic Disease , Rhinitis/surgery
14.
World Neurosurg ; 176: 143-148, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37149088

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is currently no consensus on the appropriate timing of noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (PPV) resumption in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) after endoscopic pituitary surgery. We performed a systematic review of the literature to better assess the safety of early PPV use in OSA patients following surgery. METHODS: The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Databases in English were searched using the keywords: "sleep apnea," "CPAP," "endoscopic," "skull base," "transsphenoidal" and "pituitary surgery." Case reports, editorials, reviews, meta-analyses, unpublished and abstract-only articles were all excluded. RESULTS: Five retrospective studies were identified, comprising 267 patients with OSA who underwent endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery. The mean age of patients in four studies (n = 198) was 56.3 years (SD = 8.6) and the most common indication for surgery was pituitary adenoma resection. The timing of PPV resumption following surgery was reported in four studies (n = 130), with 29 patients receiving PPV therapy within two weeks. The pooled rate of postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leak associated with PPV resumption was 4.0% (95% CI: 1.3-6.7%) in three studies (n = 27) and there were no reports of pneumocephalus associated with PPV use in the early postoperative period (<2 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Early resumption of PPV in OSA patients after endoscopic endonasal pituitary surgery appears relatively safe. However, the current literature is limited. Additional studies with more rigorous outcome reporting are warranted to assess the true safety of re-initiating PPV postoperatively in this population.


Subject(s)
Pituitary Diseases , Pituitary Neoplasms , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Pituitary Diseases/surgery , Pituitary Gland , Pituitary Neoplasms/surgery , Pituitary Neoplasms/complications , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/surgery , Sleep Apnea, Obstructive/complications , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Period
15.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 2885-2890, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36866689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Commonly used endoscopic grading scales, such as the nasal polyp scale, inadequately describe the degree of polyposis found postoperatively in the paranasal sinus cavities. The purpose of this study was to create a novel grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities, the Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS). METHODS: A modified Delphi method was utilized to establish the POPS using consensus opinion among 13 general otolaryngologists, rhinologists, and allergists. Postoperative endoscopy videos from 50 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained rhinologists and scored according to the POPS. Videos were rated again 1 month later by the same reviewers, and scores were assessed for test-retest and inter-rater reliability. RESULTS: Overall inter-rater reliability for the first and second reviews of the 52 videos was Kf = 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) and Kf = 0.50 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) for the POPS. Intra-rater reliability showed near-perfect test-retest reliability for the POPS with Kf = 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84). CONCLUSION: The POPS is an easy-to-use, reliable, and novel objective endoscopic grading scale that more accurately describes polyp recurrence in the postoperative state which will be useful in the future for measuring the efficacy of various medical and surgical interventions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 Laryngoscope, 133:2885-2890, 2023.


Subject(s)
Nasal Polyps , Paranasal Sinuses , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Rhinitis/diagnosis , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/surgery , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Nasal Polyps/diagnosis , Nasal Polyps/surgery , Endoscopy/methods , Chronic Disease
16.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 13(10): 1852-1863, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36808854

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Cavernous Hemangioma Exclusively Endonasal Resection (CHEER) staging system has become the gold standard for outcomes reporting in endoscopic orbital surgery for orbital cavernous hemangiomas (OCHs). A recent systematic review demonstrated similar outcomes between OCHs and other primary benign orbital tumors (PBOTs). Therefore, we hypothesized that a simplified and more comprehensive classification system could be developed to predict surgical outcomes of other PBOTs. METHODS: Patient and tumor characteristics as well as surgical outcomes from 11 international centers were recorded. All tumors were retrospectively assigned an Orbital Resection by Intranasal Technique (ORBIT) class and stratified based on surgical approach as either exclusively endoscopic or combined (endoscopic and open). Outcomes based on approach were compared using chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests. The Cochrane-Armitage test for trend was used to analyze outcomes by class. RESULTS: Findings from 110 PBOTs from 110 patients (age 49.0 ± 15.0 years, 51.9% female) were included in the analysis. Higher ORBIT class was associated with a lower likelihood of gross total resection (GTR). GTR was more likely to be achieved when an exclusively endoscopic approach was utilized (p < 0.05). Tumors resected using a combined approach tended to be larger, to present with diplopia, and to have an immediate postoperative cranial nerve palsy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic treatment of PBOTs is an effective approach, with favorable short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes as well as low rate of adverse events. The ORBIT classification system is an anatomic-based framework that effectively facilitates high-quality outcomes reporting for all PBOTs.


Subject(s)
Hemangioma, Cavernous , Orbital Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Orbital Neoplasms/surgery , Orbital Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Nose/surgery , Endoscopy , Hemangioma, Cavernous/surgery
17.
Otol Neurotol ; 44(3): 201-208, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36728114

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The following research question was asked: In patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) that underwent stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and cochlear implantation, were improvements in hearing function observed, and what was the cochlear implant (CI) failure rate of in these patients? DATA SOURCES: PubMed/Medline, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), and Web of Science articles without restrictions on publication dates were searched. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria required that the article was a report, a series, or a retrospective review with individual case data available. Non-English articles were excluded. Inclusion criteria required that patients were with VS and underwent subsequent SRS and cochlear implantation. Patients receiving microsurgery or stereotactic radiotherapy on the ipsilateral ear were excluded from this study. DATA EXTRACTION: Included studies were evaluated using full-text evaluation, and data on study characteristics (author names, gender), clinical data (syndromic information, SRS modality), hearing outcomes, and device failure were extracted. DATA SYNTHESIS: Means and averages were obtained for all continuous variables. Percentages were ascertained for all categorical variables. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients undergoing CI placement in VS treated with SRS achieved open-set speech perception (79.2%) or environmental sound awareness (6.8%). Twelve implants (20.3%) failed. Three patterns were associated with failure: 1) immediate-onset failure, 2) initial benefit with delayed failure, 3) poor local control with device explantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Neuroma, Acoustic , Radiosurgery , Humans , Neuroma, Acoustic/radiotherapy , Neuroma, Acoustic/surgery , Neuroma, Acoustic/complications , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Hearing , Cochlea/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
18.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 37(4): 502-511, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36691694

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: ClariFix for posterior nasal nerve ablation has been approved for use since 2017, and this is the first study attempting to synthesize and assess the efficacy of this new device on the management of chronic rhinitis. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of ClariFix in the symptomatic management of patients with chronic rhinitis. The main outcome measure is the mean difference in the reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS). METHODS: A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline, Web of Science, and EBSCOhost was conducted from inception to May 2022. Peer-reviewed clinical trials reporting postcryotherapy rTNSS at both 1- and 3-month intervals for patients with chronic rhinitis were included. A random-effects model was utilized for meta-analysis. Study heterogeneity, bias, and overall quality were all assessed. The authors followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The primary outcome measures included mean differences in rTNSS from baseline to both 1- and 3-month postoperative time points. Secondary measures included other questionnaires including the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). RESULTS: There were 5 studies that met the criteria (247 individuals). The pooled rTNSS mean difference from baseline to 1 and 3 months postoperatively was found to be -3.48 points (95% CI: -3.73 to -3.23, I2 = 0.13). and -3.50 (95% CI: -3.71 to -3.29, I2 = 0.00), respectively. The mean difference from baseline to 3 months postoperatively regarding the RQLQ was found to be -1.53 (95% CI: -1.74 to -1.31, I2 = 0.00). The most common adverse effects included facial or surgical site pain (40.4%), followed by headache (18.2%), oral numbness (11.1%), and sinusitis (4.0%). CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this systematic review suggest that cryoablation with Clarifix is an effective treatment modality for chronic rhinitis. However, higher-quality randomized controlled trials will need to be performed to affirm the findings of this study.


Subject(s)
Cryosurgery , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Humans , Rhinitis/surgery , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Quality of Life , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Nose
20.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 132(7): 806-817, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35959948

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Anosmia and hyposmia significantly affect patients' quality of life and have many etiologies, including trauma, inflammatory conditions including chronic rhinosinusitis, neoplasm, and viral infections, such as rhinovirus and SARS-CoV-2. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to establish whether a consensus exists regarding optimal management of olfactory dysfunction and to provide insight into the treatment of anosmia in the current climate of increased prevalence secondary to COVID-19. Thus, we aimed to systematically review the literature on the management of non-Chronic-rhinosinusitis- related anosmia/hyposmia. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched for articles published since January 1990 using terms combined with Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We included articles evaluating management of anosmia and hyposmia written in the English language, with original data, a minimum of 3 months of follow-up except for COVID-related studies, at least 2 patients, and well-defined and measurable outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 3013 unique titles were returned upon the initial search. Of these, 297 abstracts were examined, yielding 19 full texts meeting inclusion criteria (8 with level 1 evidence, 3 with level 2, 1 with level 3, and 7 with level 4). The studies included a total of 1522 subjects, with follow up ranging from 3 to 72 months, with an exception for COVID related studies. Endpoints were based on clinically significant improvements of olfactory functions as measured through validated smell tests. Treatments with the most robust data were intranasal corticosteroids and olfactory training. CONCLUSION: The literature on the treatment of anosmia and hyposmia includes randomized trials showing the efficacy of a few modalities. While further research is needed to expand therapeutic options for this debilitating condition, the current literature supports the use of olfactory training and topical corticosteroids.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Olfaction Disorders , Sinusitis , Humans , Anosmia , COVID-19/complications , SARS-CoV-2 , Olfaction Disorders/diagnosis , Olfaction Disorders/etiology , Olfaction Disorders/therapy , Quality of Life , Smell , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Sinusitis/complications , Sinusitis/diagnosis , Sinusitis/therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...