Promoting pain coping skills in haemophilia: A remote intervention integrating exercise and pain education.

BACKGROUND: Chronic joint pain is a significant and widespread symptom in people with haemophilia (PWH). Despite medical advancements, effective pain management remains challenging. AIM: This study presents an innovative approach that integrates remote physical exercises, pain neuroscience education, and coping strategies to address chronic pain in PWH. METHODS: The remote intervention consisted of sixteen 5-min videos encompassing physical exercises for chronic pain management and pain education strategies. These videos formed an 8-week remote intervention program. Clinical and physical assessments were conducted before and after the intervention. RESULTS: A total of thirty-one PWHs, with a median age of 34 years (ranging from 16 to 59 years), completed the remote intervention. The study revealed significant improvements in pain intensity, disability, and physical performance among PWH with chronic pain. Enhanced functional capacity was evident in the Timed Up and Go and Single Leg Stance tests, accompanied by improved scores on the Functional Independence Score in Haemophilia (FISH). Although lacking a control group, our findings are consistent with other successful exercise and pain education programs. CONCLUSIONS: This innovative intervention holds promise for managing chronic pain in PWH, underscoring patient empowerment, education, and collaboration. Notably, our study stands out by uniquely combining pain education and coping strategies, bolstering evidence for effective pain management.

Immunogenicity of Current and New Therapies for Hemophilia A.

Anti-drug antibody (ADA) development is a significant complication in the treatment of several conditions. For decades, the mainstay of hemophilia A treatment was the replacement of deficient coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) to restore hemostasis, control, and prevent bleeding events. Recently, new products have emerged for hemophilia A replacement therapy, including bioengineered FVIII molecules with enhanced pharmacokinetic profiles: the extended half-life (EHL) recombinant FVIII products. However, the main complication resulting from replacement treatment in hemophilia A is the development of anti-FVIII neutralizing alloantibodies, known as inhibitors, affecting approximately 25-30% of severe hemophilia A patients. Therefore, the immunogenicity of each FVIII product and the mechanisms that could help increase the tolerance to these products have become important research topics in hemophilia A. Furthermore, patients with inhibitors continue to require effective treatment for breakthrough bleedings and procedures, despite the availability of non-replacement therapy, such as emicizumab. Herein, we discuss the currently licensed treatments available for hemophilia A and the immunogenicity of new therapies, such as EHL-rFVIII products, compared to other products available.

Impact of novel hemophilia therapies around the world.

Hemophilia A and B are hereditary bleeding disorders, characterized by factor VIII or IX deficiencies, respectively. For many decades, prophylaxis with coagulation factor concentrates (replacement therapy) was the standard-of-care approach in hemophilia. Since the 1950s, when prophylaxis started, factor concentrates have been improved with virus inactivation and molecule modification to extend its half-life. The past years have brought an intense revolution in hemophilia care, with the development of nonfactor therapy and gene therapy. Emicizumab is the first and only nonreplacement agent to be licensed for prophylaxis in people with hemophilia A, and real-world data show similar efficacy and safety from the pivotal studies. Other nonreplacement agents and gene therapy have ongoing studies with promising results. Innovative approaches, like subcutaneous factor VIII and lipid nanoparticles, are in the preclinical phase. These novel agents, such as extended half-life concentrates and emicizumab, have been available in resource-constrained countries through the constant efforts of the World Federation of Haemophilia Humanitarian Aid Program. Despite the wide range of new approaches and therapies, the main challenge remains the same: to guarantee treatment for all. In this article, we discuss the evolution of hemophilia care, global access to hemophilia treatment, and the current and future strategies that are now under development. Finally, we summarize relevant new data on this topic presented at the ISTH 2021 virtual congress.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: looking beyond factor expression.

Hemophilia A (factor VIII [FVIII] deficiency) and hemophilia B (factor IX [FIX] deficiency) are the X-linked recessive bleeding disorders that clinically manifest with recurrent bleeding, predominantly into muscles and joints. In its severe presentation, when factor activity is less than 1% of normal, hemophilia presents with spontaneous musculoskeletal bleeds and may progress to debilitating chronic arthropathy. Management of hemophilia has changed profoundly in the past decades. From on-demand to prophylactic factor concentrate replacement, the treatment goal shifted from controlling bleeds to preventing bleeds and improving quality of life. In this new scenario, gene therapy has arisen as a paradigm-changing therapeutic option, a one-time treatment with the potential to achieve sustained coagulation FVIII or FIX expression even within the normal range. This review discusses the critical impact of adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene transfer in hemophilia care, including the recent clinical outcomes, changes in disease perceptions, and its treatment burden. We also discuss the challenging scenario of the AAV-directed immune response in the clinical setting and potential strategies to improve the long-lasting efficacy of hemophilia gene therapy efficacy.

A retrospective analysis of 122 immune thrombocytopenia patients treated with dapsone: Efficacy, safety and factors associated with treatment response.

BACKGROUND: The optimum second-line treatment or best sequence of treatments for immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) are yet to be determined. Our institution has accumulated extensive experience regarding the use of dapsone as second-line therapy for ITP. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the efficacy rate and safety of dapsone treatment in ITP patients. PATIENTS/METHODS: Here we report our experience in a retrospective study, including 122 patients, with a median treatment duration with dapsone of 6 months and a median follow-up period of 3.4 years. RESULTS: The overall response rate in this cohort was 66%, including 24% of complete responses. Among responders, in 24% a relapse occurred while on treatment. Therefore, a sustained response was observed in 51% of patients. Interestingly, 81% of the responders maintained the response after the interruption of treatment, for a median time of 26 months. Side effects were reported in 16% of the patients in this cohort and treatment was interrupted due to side effects in 11% of patients. The main cause in these cases was hemolytic anemia and methemoglobinemia. Reductions in hemoglobin levels during the use of dapsone were seen in 94% of the patients. Responders presented significantly greater reductions in their hemoglobin levels than nonresponders did: median hemoglobin drop of 1.9 g/dl vs. 1.2 g/dl (p = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that dapsone has adequate efficacy and is well tolerated. Although the mechanism of action is still unclear, our observation that the degree in the drop of hemoglobin is greater in responders suggest a possible role of the blockage of the reticuloendothelial system in the therapeutic effect of the drug.

Low prevalence of Post-thrombotic syndrome in patients treated with rivaroxaban.

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). Residual vein thrombus (RVT) on Doppler Ultrasound can be associated with PTS. Limited data are available on the effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on the long-term outcome of PTS. This study aimed to compare the prevalence of PTS and RVT, in patients with previous DVT treated with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin/warfarin. A total of 129 patients with previous proximal lower limb DVT and treated with rivaroxaban (n = 71) or enoxaparin/warfarin (n = 58) for at least 3 months were included. The Villalta scale for PTS was performed after treatment. The median duration of the DVT symptoms before anticoagulation was 7 days for both groups. The rate of PTS was 50.7% in the patients treated with rivaroxaban and 69% in the enoxaparin/warfarin group. Enoxaparin/warfarin showed an increased prevalence of PTS (P = .018). An analysis in 3 different models showed that the relative risk of PTS decreased by 76% with rivaroxaban use when compared with enoxaparin/warfarin treatment. In addition, 93 of the 129 patients were evaluated regarding the presence of RVT, of which, 11 (24.4%) and 31 (64.6%) presented with RVT for rivaroxaban and enoxaparin/warfarin, respectively (P < .0001). The RVT analysis excluded the possibility of RVT as a mediator of the association between type of treatment and PTS when comparing rivaroxaban with enoxaparin/warfarin (odds ratio (OR) = 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.1-1.0, P = .051) with rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin/warfarin. Rivaroxaban treatment was associated with a lower risk of PTS when compared to enoxaparin/warfarin; RVT however, was not a mediator in the association between PTS and type of treatment.

Gene Therapy: Paving New Roads in the Treatment of Hemophilia.

Hemophilia is a monogenic disease with robust clinicolaboratory correlations of severity. These attributes coupled with the availability of experimental animal models have made it an attractive model for gene therapy. The road from animal models to human clinical studies has heralded significant successes, but major issues concerning a previous immunity against adeno-associated virus and transgene optimization remain to be fully resolved. Despite significant advances in gene therapy application, many questions remain pertaining to its use in specific populations such as those with factor inhibitors, those with underlying liver disease, and pediatric patients. Here, the authors provide an update on viral vector and transgene improvements, review the results of recently published gene therapy clinical trials for hemophilia, and discuss the main challenges facing investigators in the field.

Longitudinal sequencing of RUNX1 familial platelet disorder: new insights into genetic mechanisms of transformation to myeloid malignancies.

The mechanisms by which patients with RUNX1 familial platelet disorder with propensity to myeloid malignancies (FPDMM) develop myeloid malignancies (MM) are not fully understood. We report the results of targeted next-generation sequencing on three patients with RUNX1 FPDMM who developed acute myeloid leukaemia or myelodysplastic syndromes (AML/MDS). DNA samples were collected from bone marrow, peripheral blood and buccal swabs at different time points. One patient had clonal haematopoiesis, represented by an SRSF2 p.P95R variant, prior to his AML diagnosis, when he developed an additional NRAS p.G12D variant. His sister presented to us with MDS, with a TET2 p.S471fs and identical NRAS p.G12D variant. The third patient, from another family, had an additional RUNX1 p.R204X and an NFE2 p.Q139fs variant at AML diagnosis. This constitutes the first report of NFE2 variants in AML without extramedullary disease and NRAS variants in AML/MDS in the setting of FPDMM. A systematic review of the literature including our findings distinguishes two genetic landscapes at AML transformation from FPDMM characterized by either the presence or absence of somatic abnormalities in RUNX1 with or without variants in genes usually associated with MM. Whether clonal haematopoiesis precedes transformation only in patients without somatic abnormalities in RUNX1 needs further confirmation.