Visual outcomes and complications of combined versus sequential pars plana vitrectomy and phacoemulsification for epiretinal membrane.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic epiretinal membrane (ERM) often requires surgical intervention via pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), for which cataract development is a common complication. There is insufficient data on the visual outcomes and complications of combined phacovitrectomy (COMB) in comparison to sequential PPV with deferred cataract surgery (SEQ) for ERM. METHODS: A retrospective dataset analysis of 8 National Health Service ophthalmology departments. The main outcome measures were postoperative visual acuity (VA), operative complications, postoperative cystoid macular oedema (CMO) and recurrent ERM. RESULTS: We included 898 and 299 eyes in the COMB and SEQ groups, respectively. Both procedures resulted in significantly better VA across all follow-up intervals (24 weeks). The proportion of eyes with Snellen VA of at least 20/40 at 12-24 weeks was comparable in both groups (47.8% [COMB] vs. 54.7% [SEQ], p = 0.4456). More eyes in the COMB group experienced posterior capsular rupture (2.9% vs. 0%, p = 0.0009) and iatrogenic retinal trauma (2.4% vs. 0%, p = 0.0023). However, regression analysis revealed that combined surgery did not predict either complication. There were no significant differences in the rates of CMO (6.5% [COMB] vs. 9% [SEQ], p = 0.1522) and recurrent ERM (2.1% [COMB] vs. 3.3% [SEQ], p = 0.2758) between both groups. CONCLUSION: Both combined and sequential procedures are comparably effective and safe means for managing eyes with ERM.

Intraoperative complications and visual outcomes of cataract surgery in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

PURPOSE: To compare the rate of intraoperative complications and visual outcomes in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (NvAMD) and control eyes without NvAMD undergoing phacoemulsification. SETTING: Multicenter study. DESIGN: Retrospective, nonrandomized comparative study. METHODS: Eyes were classified based on the presence or absence of an NvAMD diagnosis. The main outcomes were (1) the rate of intraoperative complications, (2) the logMAR visual acuity (VA) at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively in both groups, and (3) the reinjection rate of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor after phacoemulsification. RESULTS: Preoperative VA was worse in the NvAMD group (0.9 ± 0.5) compared with the reference group (0.6 ± 0.5). We observed no difference in the rate of posterior capsule rupture (PCR) (2.90% vs 2.77%; P = .889), dropped lens fragments (0.46% vs 0.29%; P = .618), or zonular dialysis (0.46% vs 0.58%, P = .749) between the 2 groups. Receiving ≥10 intravitreal injections before cataract surgery predicted the likelihood of PCR with an odds ratio of 2.86 (P = .027). Proportions of eyes achieving a visual gain of ≥0.3 logMAR (∼3 Snellen lines equivalent) was lower in NvAMD eyes (39.2% vs 63.7%; P < .0001). We observed 203 eyes (73%) in the active treatment group and 139 eyes (36%) in the inactive treatment group received >1 intravitreal injection after phacoemulsification (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: The risk for PCR was higher for eyes receiving ≥10 intravitreal injections before phacoemulsification. Only 39% of eyes with NvAMD had visual improvement by ≥3 Snellen lines.

Impact of axial length on visual outcomes and complications in phacoemulsification surgery: a multicenter database study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of axial length (AL) on the visual outcome and rate of perioperative complications in phacoemulsification surgery. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical database study. METHODS: Cataract surgery data of 217,556 eyes was extracted from the electronic medical records of 8 ophthalmic centers in the United Kingdom from July 2003 to March 2015. A total of 88,774 eyes without ocular co-pathologies were grouped eyes according to AL (mm): short AL (< 22), average AL (22-26; reference group), and long AL (> 26). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: We analyzed visual acuity (VA) outcomes at 4 weeks, 4-12 weeks, and 12-24 weeks postoperatively, as well as the incidence of posterior capsular rupture (PCR), torn iris (TI), cystoid macular edema (CME), and retinal detachment (RD). RESULTS: Mean pre-operative VA (logMAR) was the worst in eyes with long AL compared to average and short AL eyes (VA 0.59 vs. 0.58 and 0.56; p < 0.001). However, post-operative VA at 4-12 weeks was slightly better in the long AL group (0.14 in short and average AL; 0.12 in long AL, p < 0.001). We observed an increased odds of TI in the short AL group (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.60-2.75). There was increased risk of RD in long AL eyes (p < 0.001). However, PCR and CME rates were not different. CONCLUSION: In the absence of any coexisting ocular pathology, AL alone did not have an impact on VA improvement or the risk of encountering PCR or CME. The risk of TI was greater in the short AL group, and the risk of RD was higher in the long AL group.

Risk of Pseudophakic Cystoid Macular Edema in Fellow-Eye Cataract Surgeries: A Multicenter Database Study.

PURPOSE: To quantify the risk of pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (pCME) in fellow-eye cataract surgery and to determine risk factors, including prior first-eye pCME. DESIGN: Retrospective, clinical database study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing bilateral nonsimultaneous cataract surgeries in 8 UK National Health Service clinical centers between July 2003 and March 2015. METHODS: We excluded patients with a history of diabetic macular edema (DME) or CME and perioperative topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use in either eye. We calculated the overall risk of pCME and used Poisson model with robust estimation of standard error to identify potential risk factors for pCME in the fellow eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The risk of postoperative clinical pCME in the fellow eye. RESULTS: A total of 54 209 patients were included. The mean age was 74.6 ± 10.4 years, and 38.8% were male. The fellow eye developed pCME in 544 patients (1%). The risk of fellow-eye pCME among patients without first-eye pCME was 0.9%. However, the risk of fellow-eye pCME among those with first-eye pCME was 10.7%. In the fully adjusted model, we found that the risk factors for the development of fellow-eye pCME were first-eye pCME (RR, 8.55, 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.19-11.8), epiretinal membrane (ERM) (RR, 4.1, CI, 2.63-6.19), history of retinal vein occlusion (RR, 2.94, CI, 1.75-4.93), diabetes without history of DME (RR, 2.08, CI, 1.73-2.5), advanced cataract (RR, 1.75, CI, 1.16-2.65), prostaglandin analogue use preoperatively (RR, 1.49, CI, 1.13-1.97), and male sex (RR, 1.19, CI, 1.0-1.41). CONCLUSIONS: History of pCME in the first-operated eye is the strongest independent risk factor for the development of pCME in the fellow eye. Our findings may guide clinicians in counseling patients on the risk of pCME before performing cataract surgery in the fellow eye and help in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from prophylactic therapy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Visual outcomes and postoperative complications of eyes with dropped lens fragments during cataract surgery: multicenter database study.

PURPOSE: To analyze the visual outcomes and postoperative complications of phacoemulsification cataract surgery in eyes with posterior capsule rupture (PCR) and dropped lens fragments (DLFs) in comparison with a reference group with uneventful surgery. SETTING: 8 UK National Health Service departments. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative nonrandomized study. METHODS: Demographic, medical history, and ocular examination data were automatically extracted from the electronic records. The main outcome variables were postoperative visual acuity (VA), and the development of postoperative cystoid macular edema (CME) as well as rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) requiring surgery. RESULTS: The analysis included 175 589 eyes in the reference group, 2751 eyes in the PCR group, and 519 eyes in the DLF group. During all postoperative intervals, the mean VA in the DLF and PCR groups was significantly worse than the reference group ( P < .001). On multivariate analysis, the odds of having a VA ≤0.3 logMAR at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively among eyes with DLF and PCR were 88% and 73% lower than the reference group ( P < .001). More eyes developed CME in the DLF and PCR groups ( P < .001). The odds of requiring RRD and ERM surgery were 3.6 and 2.1 times higher in the DLF group, and 1.8 and 1.3 times higher in the PCR group, respectively, as compared with the reference group. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes undergoing phacoemulsification complicated by PCR, and more so with DLF, have worse visual outcomes and higher chances of CME, ERM, and RRD when compared with uneventful surgery.

Efficacy and safety of brolucizumab versus aflibercept in eyes with early persistent retinal fluid: 96-week outcomes from the HAWK and HARRIER studies.

OBJECTIVE: Post-hoc analysis to compare the outcomes of brolucizumab 6 mg vs. aflibercept 2 mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) patients with early persistent retinal fluid in HAWK and HARRIER. METHODS: After 3 monthly loading doses, brolucizumab-treated eyes (N = 730) received injections every 12 weeks (q12w) or q8w if disease activity was detected. Aflibercept-treated eyes (N = 729) received fixed q8w dosing. Early persistent fluid was defined as the presence of subretinal fluid and/or intraretinal fluid up to Week 12. RESULTS: A lower proportion of brolucizumab patients had early persistent retinal fluid compared with aflibercept (11.2% (n = 82) vs. 19.2% (n = 140)). In these patients, 34.1% of the brolucizumab-treated group achieved a ≥ 15 ETDRS letter gain in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at Week 96 compared with 20.7% of the aflibercept-treated group. Brolucizumab achieved numerically better BCVA outcomes (Week 96: brolucizumab, +6.4 letters; aflibercept, +3.7 letters) and significantly greater central subfield thickness reductions versus aflibercept from baseline through Week 96 (Week 96: -202 µm vs. -145 µm; p = 0.0206). Brolucizumab demonstrated an overall favourable benefit/risk profile in this patient cohort. In their unmasked, post-hoc review, the Safety Review Committee identified two cases of retinal vasculitis and no cases of retinal vascular occlusion in the brolucizumab arm; no cases of retinal vasculitis or retinal vascular occlusion were identified in the aflibercept arm. CONCLUSION: In this analysis, anatomical and visual outcomes were better with brolucizumab compared with aflibercept. Brolucizumab may therefore achieve greater disease control than aflibercept in nAMD patients with early persistent retinal fluid.

Visual outcomes and complications of combined vs sequential cataract surgery and pars plana vitrectomy: multicenter database study.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and rates of intraoperative complications in eyes that underwent combined cataract extraction (CE) and pars plana vitrectomy (combined group) with those that underwent sequential surgery (sequential group). SETTING: Multicenter study. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: CE data set pooled from 8 UK sites between 2000 and 2015. The main outcome measures were the mean postoperative visual acuity (VA) and the rate of intraoperative complications in both groups. RESULTS: 2236 eyes in the combined group and 2270 eyes in the sequential group were included in this study. Mean preoperative VA was 1.0 logMAR in both groups. The mean logMAR postoperative VA was worse in the combined group than in the sequential group ( P < .0001) at all timepoints, however, the differences in visual improvement between both groups decreased with longer follow-up time: 1.0 ± 0.7 vs 0.6 ± 0.6, 0.7 ± 0.6 vs 0.4 ± 0.5, and 0.7 ± 0.6 vs 0.5 ± 0.5 at 0 to 4 weeks, 4 to 12 weeks, and 12 to 24 weeks, respectively. Proportions of eyes that gained >3 logMAR units were 49% in the combined group and 66.2% in the sequential group ( P < .0001). Logistic regression analysis showed that sequential surgery (odds ratio, 2.1) was a predictor for reaching 20/40 vision by 6 months. In the combined group, there was a statistically significantly higher rate of posterior capsular rupture. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative visual gain was less in the combined group with a higher rate of posterior capsular rupture as compared with sequential phacovitrectomy. However, small differences in visual improvements between both groups by 6 months were observed.

Long-term Retinal Morphology and Functional Associations in Treated Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Findings from the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-Related Choroidal Neovascularisation Trial.

PURPOSE: To describe the frequency of long-term morphologic features and their relationships with visual function in participants who exited the Inhibition of VEGF in Age-Related Choroidal Neovascularisation (IVAN; ISRCTN92166560) trial. DESIGN: Multicenter cohort study up to 7 years after enrollment. PARTICIPANTS: Patients enrolled in the IVAN trial, excluding participants who died or withdrew during the trial. METHODS: Multimodal fundus images, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and low-luminance visual acuity (LLVA) were obtained for a subset of 199 participants who attended a research visit. Clinical sites (n = 20) also provided all visual acuity and clinical information from usual care records for 532 participants and submitted the most recent color, OCT, and other fundus images for 468 participants to a reading center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Assessed the following from the most recent images: intralesional macular atrophy (ILMA) within the footprint of the neovascular lesion; hyperreflective material (HRM); intraretinal fluid (IRF); subretinal fluid (SRF); pigment epithelial detachment (PED); and disorganized retinal outer layers (DROLs). Cross-sectional relationships between morphologic features and BCVA/LLVA were estimated. RESULTS: Intralesional macular atrophy was present in 31.8% of the study eyes at IVAN exit (mean follow-up, 1.96 years) and 89.5% at the most recent imaging visit (mean follow-up, 6.18 years). Hyperreflective material, IRF, SRF, PED, and DROLs were present in 78.8%, 47.7%, 7.6%, 94.5%, and 55% of the study eyes, respectively. In the subset with complete imaging data, in eyes without DROL, the BCVA was worst in the thinnest outer fovea tertile (thinnest minus middle and thickest tertiles, -19.7 and -19.5 letters, respectively), whereas in eyes with DROL, the BCVA was worst in the thickest (thinnest and middle tertiles minus thickest, 12.5 and 12.2, respectively). Regression models showed that the presence of ILMA and HRM was independently associated with BCVA (22 letters worse [95% confidence interval {CI}, -11.2 to -32.8; P < 0.001] and 9.8 letters worse [95% CI, -0.1 to -19.4; P = 0.047], respectively). Subretinal fluid and foveal PED were associated with better BCVA (5.9 letters [95% CI, -7.9 to 19.7; P = 0.399] and 6.4 letters [95% CI, -1.1 to 14.0; P = 0.094], respectively). The model with LLVA was similar. A sensitivity analysis involving the entire eligible cohort yielded similar estimates. CONCLUSIONS: Macular atrophy and HRM were common after 7 years of follow-up and strongly associated with visual outcomes.

The changing landscape for the management of patients with neovascular AMD: brolucizumab in clinical practice.

Untreated neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) can lead to severe and permanent visual impairment. The chronic nature of the disease can have a significant impact on patients' quality of life and an economic and time burden on medical retina (MR) services, with the care need outweighing the growth of resources that clinical services can access. The introduction of a new treatment into clinical services can be challenging, especially for services that are already under capacity constraints. Guidance for practical implementation is therefore helpful. Roundtable meetings, facilitated by Novartis UK, between a working group of MR experts with experience of leading and managing NHS retinal services in the intravitreal era were conducted between 2020 and 2021. These meetings explored various aspects and challenges of introducing a new anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy to the UK medical retina services. Provision of clear expert recommendations and practical guidance nationally, that can be adapted locally as required to support clinicians and healthcare professionals (HCPs), is valuable in supporting the introduction of a new anti-VEGF therapy within the NHS environment. The experts provide ophthalmologic HCPs with a collation of insights and recommendations to support the introduction and delivery of brolucizumab in their local service in the face of current and projected growth in demand for retina care.

The clinical relevance of ultra-widefield angiography findings in patients with central retinal vein occlusion and macular oedema receiving anti-VEGF therapy.

AIMS: To report, using ultra-widefield angiography (UWFA) the area, distribution, and change in retinal capillary nonperfusion (RCNP) at baseline and 100 weeks in eyes with central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) receiving anti-VEGF for macula oedema. METHODS: Prospective longitudinal multi-centre cohort study. Adults with CRVO treated with anti-VEGF therapy for macular oedema underwent UWFA at baseline and week-100. The area, distribution, and change in total, peripheral and posterior pole RCNP were determined. RESULTS: Of 153 eyes at baseline, mean area of RCNP was 34.3DA and 12 (7.8%) had ≥75DA RCNP. More than 10DA RCNP was present in the temporal periphery in 75.8% of eyes vs. 10.5% in the nasal periphery. At week-100, mean RCNP was 42.1DA with a median change from baseline of 3.3DA 95% CI [0.4, 7.3]; p < 0.01. Of 146 eyes with ≤10DA of posterior pole RCNP at baseline, 16/146 (11.0%) progressed to >10DA at week-100. These eyes had a median increase in total RCNP of 69.7DA [95% CI 27.2-85.4] vs 0DA [0.0-1.4]; p < 0.001 for those who did not, and two developed neovascular glaucoma. Larger baseline area of RCNP and history of glaucoma were risk factors for posterior pole RCNP developing. CONCLUSIONS: With UWFA, significant baseline RCNP was identified in the majority of CRVO patients, notably in the temporal periphery, but large increases over 100 weeks were uncommon. Development of >10DA posterior pole RCNP is a marker for widespread RCNP and in such cases the risk of anterior segment neovascularisation is not abolished by concomitant anti-VEGF therapy.

Visual outcomes of primary versus secondary epiretinal membrane following vitrectomy and cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes, incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and rate of repeat epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery following phacovitrectomy for primary and secondary ERM. METHODS: Retrospective review of 178,856 cataract surgeries from 2003 to 2015. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with ERM peel were included (n = 708). Eyes were divided into primary (n = 538) and secondary (n = 170) ERM groups. Patient demographics, visual acuity (VA), and postoperative CME were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with secondary ERM had worse preoperative VA, 0.9 ± 0.6 logMAR (20/160 Snellen equivalent) as compared to patients with primary ERM, 0.6 ± 0.3 (20/80), respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the secondary and primary ERM groups in postoperative vision (0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR vs. 0.5 ± 0.3; p = 0.9962) or proportion with VA ≥ 20/40 (46.4% vs. 43.1%; p = 0.6744) at 12-24 weeks. Postoperative CME was twice as likely in the secondary ERM group (16.5%) compared to the primary ERM group (7.8%) (p = 0.0018). There was no difference in the rate of repeat ERM surgery between the secondary ERM group (1.8%) and the primary ERM group (1.5%) (p = 0.7308). CONCLUSION: Eyes with secondary ERM had significant postoperative improvement in VA. They had worse preoperative VA and had a twofold increase in postoperative CME than primary ERM.

Intraoperative complications and visual outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with retinal vein occlusion: multicenter database study.

PURPOSE: To compare the visual outcomes and the rate of intraoperative complications in eyes with and without retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after phacoemulsification over a period of 15 years in a real-world clinical setting. SETTING: 8 independent U.K. National Health Service ophthalmology departments. DESIGN: Retrospective, multicenter cohort study. METHODS: Eyes were classified based on the presence or absence of RVO. For analyzing visual acuity (VA) and the incidence of postoperative cystoid macular edema, eyes with any copathology, combined ocular surgical procedures, and intraoperative complications, or of diabetic patients were excluded. RESULTS: Of 178 856 eyes, 1796 eyes with RVO preoperatively and 177 060 eyes without RVO were allocated to the RVO group and the reference group, respectively. Cataract surgery in eyes with RVO was associated with an improvement in the mean VA of 0.35 logMAR (3 to 4 Snellen lines), and a substantial gain (≥0.30 logMAR units [3 Snellen lines]) was achieved in 55.10% of eyes at 4 to 12 weeks postoperatively. The mean postoperative VA was worse in eyes with RVO compared with that in eyes without RVO at 4 to 12 weeks (logMAR 0.40 vs 0.12 [20/50 vs 20/25]; P < .0001). The proportion of eyes achieving a visual gain of ≥ 0.3 logMAR (3 Snellen lines) was also lower in eyes with RVO (55.10% vs 64.55%; P = .0076). There was no statistically significant difference in posterior capsule rupture rates between the 2 groups (1.73% vs 1.72%; P = .9741). CONCLUSIONS: Although postoperative vision improved significantly in eyes with RVO after cataract surgery, this improvement was worse than that achieved by eyes without RVO.

Novel metrics for evaluating decision making in a 'Treat and Extend' regimen for neovascular age related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The primary aim was to investigate outcome of the decision making on duration of injection intervals between injection visits over the first 2 years of a treat and extend regimen. METHOD: Consecutive patients receiving Aflibercept for treatment naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration between 01.01.2016 and 15.07.2017 were identified from our departmental register. Retrospective data collected on all visits over 24 months were classified into three groups: (A) Without Interval Decision Events (IDE)" Injection only" (B) IDE resulting in injection intervals of <5 weeks and (C) IDE resulting in intervals of >5 weeks. The primary outcome was number of successful IDE relative to the total visits in Group C. Successful decision making was defined as absence of worsening of visual acuity (>5 L) or central retinal thickness (>50 microns) at the subsequent visit. Secondary visual and anatomical outcomes at 24 months were also evaluated. RESULTS: Data from 56 eyes of 50 patients were included in the study. Visual acuity improved by +7.11 L at 24 months. Forty one patients with unilateral therapy made 721 visits: 280 visits (38.8%) were group A; 164 visits (22.8%) were group B and 277 visits (38.4%) were group C. Average interval in Group C was 8.9 weeks (range 5-15). The success rate of extension was 95.31% (264/277 visits). CONCLUSION: These metrics for evaluating the decision making aspect of disease activity monitoring may be useful for monitoring performance and have given us a more realistic view and expectations of what can be achieved using this regime to optimise the timing of injections.

Bilateral corneal endothelial failure following COVID-19 pneumonia.

We describe a patient who developed acute bilateral corneal decompensation following COVID-19 pneumonia and prolonged intensive care unit ventilation. SARS-CoV-2 uses human ACE2 as the receptor for entry with subsequent downregulation of ACE2. ACE2 receptors are found in human ocular surface cells including cornea. Mouse models of ACE2 deficiency result in corneal haze, oedema and ocular surface inflammation due to upregulation of the inflammatory cascades. We therefore hypothesise that the cause of this patient's corneal decompensation was viral endotheliitis due to direct infection by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT.

BACKGROUND: Licensed ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml Lucentis®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland) and aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 ml Eylea®; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany) and unlicensed bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml Avastin®; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland) are used to treat macula oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion, but their relative clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and impact on the UK NHS and Personal Social Services have never been directly compared over the typical disease treatment period. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to compare the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of three intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor agents for the management of macula oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion. DESIGN: This was a three-arm, double-masked, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. SETTING: The trial was set in 44 UK NHS ophthalmology departments, between 2014 and 2018. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 463 patients with visual impairment due to macula oedema secondary to central retinal vein occlusion were included in the trial. INTERVENTIONS: The participants were treated with repeated intravitreal injections of ranibizumab (n = 155), aflibercept (n = 154) or bevacizumab (n = 154). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was an increase in the best corrected visual acuity letter score from baseline to 100 weeks in the trial eye. The null hypothesis that aflibercept and bevacizumab are each inferior to ranibizumab was tested with a non-inferiority margin of -5 visual acuity letters over 100 weeks. Secondary outcomes included additional visual acuity, and imaging outcomes, Visual Function Questionnaire-25, EuroQol-5 Dimensions with and without a vision bolt-on, and drug side effects. Cost-effectiveness was estimated using treatment costs and Visual Function Questionnaire-Utility Index to measure quality-adjusted life-years. RESULTS: The adjusted mean changes at 100 weeks in the best corrected visual acuity letter scores were as follows - ranibizumab, 12.5 letters (standard deviation 21.1 letters); aflibercept, 15.1 letters (standard deviation 18.7 letters); and bevacizumab, 9.8 letters (standard deviation 21.4 letters). Aflibercept was non-inferior to ranibizumab in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference 2.23 letters, 95% confidence interval -2.17 to 6.63 letters; p = 0.0006), but not superior. The study was unable to demonstrate that bevacizumab was non-inferior to ranibizumab in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference -1.73 letters, 95% confidence interval -6.12 to 2.67 letters; p = 0.071). A post hoc analysis was unable to demonstrate that bevacizumab was non-inferior to aflibercept in the intention-to-treat population (adjusted mean best corrected visual acuity difference was -3.96 letters, 95% confidence interval -8.34 to 0.42 letters; p = 0.32). All per-protocol population results were the same. Fewer injections were required with aflibercept (10.0) than with ranibizumab (11.8) (difference in means -1.8, 95% confidence interval -2.9 to -0.8). A post hoc analysis showed that more bevacizumab than aflibercept injections were required (difference in means 1.6, 95% confidence interval 0.5 to 2.7). There were no new safety concerns. The model- and trial-based cost-effectiveness analyses estimated that bevacizumab was the most cost-effective treatment at a threshold of £20,000-30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. LIMITATIONS: The comparison of aflibercept and bevacizumab was a post hoc analysis. CONCLUSION: The study showed aflibercept to be non-inferior to ranibizumab. However, the possibility that bevacizumab is worse than ranibizumab and aflibercept by 5 visual acuity letters cannot be ruled out. Bevacizumab is an economically attractive treatment alternative and would lead to substantial cost savings to the NHS and other health-care systems. However, uncertainty about its relative effectiveness should be discussed comprehensively with patients, their representatives and funders before treatment is considered. FUTURE WORK: To obtain extensive patient feedback and discuss with all stakeholders future bevacizumab NHS use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13623634. FUNDING: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 25, No. 38. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

The eye functions like a camera. The retina, at the back of the eye, is the camera film, and the centre, the macula, allows us to see fine details. Approximately 6500 people each year in England and Wales are affected by fluid leaking out of congested tiny blood vessels, causing macular swelling or oedema. The cause is blockage of the main vein that normally drains blood from the retina. Three drugs, injected into the eye in tiny amounts every 4­8 weeks, have been shown to improve the vision of people with this condition. Two drugs, ranibizumab (0.5 mg/0.05 ml Lucentis^®; Novartis International AG, Basel, Switzerland) and aflibercept (2 mg/0.05 ml Eylea^®; Bayer AG, Leverkusen, Germany), are licensed for UK use, but the third, bevacizumab (1.25 mg/0.05 ml Avastin^®; F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Basel, Switzerland), is not, even though it is much cheaper and used extensively worldwide. To our knowledge, no trials have compared the three drugs over the typical 2-year treatment period. This multicentre, Phase III, double-masked, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intravitreal therapy with ranibizumab (Lucentis) versus aflibercept (Eylea) versus bevacizumab (Avastin) for macular oedema due to central retinal Vein Occlusion (LEAVO) was designed to compare ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab in this type of macular oedema. The trial showed that all three drugs improved vision a lot, but bevacizumab improved vision to a slightly lesser degree than the other two drugs. All patients should be aware of these findings before considering their treatment options. A comparison of the costs and benefits of ranibizumab, aflibercept and bevacizumab, using data from the trial and other sources, found that all three led to similar improvements in quality of life. Because aflibercept and ranibizumab are so much more expensive, they may be poor value for money. If patients, their representatives and funders all agree, it may be possible to treat this type of macular oedema with bevacizumab, which is cheaper, keeping the other agents available if needed.

RNA-seq analysis of ageing human retinal pigment epithelium: Unexpected up-regulation of visual cycle gene transcription.

Ageing presents adverse effects on the retina and is the primary risk factor for age-related macular degeneration (AMD). We report the first RNA-seq analysis of age-related transcriptional changes in the human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), the primary site of AMD pathogenesis. Whole transcriptome sequencing of RPE from human donors ranging in age from 31 to 93 reveals that ageing is associated with increasing transcription of main RPE-associated visual cycle genes (including LRAT, RPE65, RDH5, RDH10, RDH11; pathway enrichment BH-adjusted P = 4.6 × 10-6 ). This positive correlation is replicated in an independent set of 28 donors and a microarray dataset of 50 donors previously published. LRAT expression is positively regulated by retinoid by-products of the visual cycle (A2E and all-trans-retinal) involving modulation by retinoic acid receptor alpha transcription factor. The results substantiate a novel age-related positive feedback mechanism between accumulation of retinoid by-products in the RPE and the up-regulation of visual cycle genes.

Importance of Anatomical Efficacy for Disease Control in Neovascular AMD: An Expert Opinion.

BACKGROUND: Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) presents a significant treatment burden for patients, carers and medical retina services. However, significant debate remains regarding how best to manage nAMD when assessing disease activity by optical coherence tomography (OCT), and particularly the significance of different types of fluid and how the understanding of anatomical efficacy can influence treatment strategies. This article provides opinion on the practical implications of anatomical efficacy and significance of fluid in the management of nAMD and proposes recommendations for healthcare professionals (HCPs) to improve understanding and promote best practice to achieve disease control. METHODS: An evidence-based review was performed and an expert panel debate from the Retina Outcomes Group (ROG), a forum of retinal specialists, provided insights and recommendations on the definition, role and practical implications of anatomical efficacy and the significance of fluid at the macula in the management of nAMD. RESULTS: The ROG has developed recommendations for achieving disease control through a zero-tolerance approach to the presence of fluid in nAMD as patients who avoid fluctuations in fluid at the macula have better visual outcomes. Recommendations cover five key areas: service protocol, training, regimen, multidisciplinary teams and engagement. This approach facilitates more standardised protocol-based treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: Targeting a fluid-free macula and aiming for disease control are essential to improve outcomes. As new therapies and technologies become available, drying the macula and maintaining disease control will become even more achievable. The outlined recommendations aim to promote best practice among HCPs and medical retina services to improve patient outcomes.

Cost Effectiveness of Ranibizumab vs Aflibercept vs Bevacizumab for the Treatment of Macular Oedema Due to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion: The LEAVO Study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to assess the cost effectiveness of intravitreal ranibizumab (Lucentis), aflibercept (Eylea) and bevacizumab (Avastin) for the treatment of macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion. METHODS: We calculated costs and quality-adjusted life-years from the UK National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. We performed a within-trial analysis using the efficacy, safety, resource use and health utility data from a randomised controlled trial (LEAVO) over 100 weeks. We built a discrete event simulation to model long-term outcomes. We estimated utilities using the Visual-Functioning Questionnaire-Utility Index, EQ-5D and EQ-5D with an additional vision question. We used standard UK costs sources for 2018/19 and a cost of £28 per bevacizumab injection. We discounted costs and quality-adjusted life-years at 3.5% annually. RESULTS: Bevacizumab was the least costly intervention followed by ranibizumab and aflibercept in both the within-trial analysis (bevacizumab: £6292, ranibizumab: £13,014, aflibercept: £14,328) and long-term model (bevacizumab: £18,353, ranibizumab: £30,226, aflibercept: £35,026). Although LEAVO did not demonstrate bevacizumab to be non-inferior for the visual acuity primary outcome, the three interventions generated similar quality-adjusted life-years in both analyses. Bevacizumab was always the most cost-effective intervention at a threshold of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life-year, even using the list price of £243 per injection. CONCLUSIONS: Wider adoption of bevacizumab for the treatment of macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion could result in substantial savings to healthcare systems and deliver similar health-related quality of life. However, patients, funders and ophthalmologists should be fully aware that LEAVO could not demonstrate that bevacizumab is non-inferior to the licensed agents.