Localized Evaporative Cooling Explains Observed Ocular Surface-Temperature Patterns.

Purpose: We determined interblink corneal surface-temperature decline and tear-film evaporation rates of localized tear breakup cold regions (LCRs) and localized tear unbroken warm regions (LWRs) of the corneal surface, as well as that of the overall average corneal surface. Methods: Each subject underwent 4 inter-day visits where the interblink corneal surface-temperature history of the right eye was measured using a FLIR A655sc infrared thermographer. Corneal surface temperature history was analyzed to determine the overall, LCR, and LWR temperature-decline rates. Evaporation rates of LCR and LWR regions were determined from the measured LCR and LWR temperature data using the physical model of Dursch et al. Results: Twenty subjects completed the study. Mean (SD) difference of LCR temperature-decline rate was -0.08 (0.07)°C/s faster than LWR (P < 0.0001). Similarly, evaporation rates of LCR and LWR were statistically different (P < 0.0001). At ambient temperature, mean LCR and LWR evaporation rates were 76% and 27% of pure water evaporation flux, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the inter-day measured temperature-decline rates and the interblink starting temperature. Conclusions: Significant differences in corneal temperature-decline rate and evaporation rate between LCR and LWR were quantified using infrared thermography. In agreement with literature, LCRs and LWRs correlate directly with fluorescein break-up areas and unbroken tear areas, respectively. Because lipid-evaporation protection is diminished in breakup areas, higher local evaporation rates and faster local cooling rates occur in LCRs relative to LWRs. Our results confirm this phenomenon clinically for the first time.

Evaluation of Antibiotic Allergy in the Ambulatory Setting Using a Standardized Questionnaire.

Patients are sometimes mislabeled as having an immune-mediated antibiotic allergy in their medical records. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of subjects with non-immune mediated reactions to antibiotics using a standardized questionnaire. Subjects aged 18 years and older with a documented antibiotic allergy were identified and recruited from 2 outpatient clinics in the greater Chicago area. Subjects completed a standardized questionnaire during a single visit regarding their previous adverse reaction to an antibiotic. For subjects with multiple documented antibiotic allergies, 1 questionnaire was filled out for each antibiotic allergy. Investigators subsequently evaluated the questionnaire responses to determine whether the adverse reaction was a true immune-mediated allergic reaction or an adverse drug reaction. A total of 98 subjects were recruited with completion of 159 questionnaires. Eighteen subjects (18.37%, 95% CI: 10.7%, 26.3%) had antibiotic allergy labels with no corresponding immune-mediated reaction history. There were 35 allergy labels (22.0%, 95% CI: 14.7%, 29.4%) that were unlikely to be immune-mediated. Antibiotics with the highest percentage of clinical histories that were unlikely to be immune-mediated were macrolides (8 of 11 subjects), nitrofurantoin (1 of 2 subjects), and amoxicillin/clavulanate (2 of 8 subjects). The most common antibiotic allergy labels were penicillin (43 of 159 subjects), sulfonamides (25 of 159 subjects), and fluoroquinolones (21 of 159 subjects). Identification of adverse reactions to antibiotics that are unlikely to be immune-mediated can be accomplished using a standardized questionnaire in the outpatient setting. Improved identification of low-risk antibiotic allergy labels can guide de-labeling initiatives to improve antibiotic prescribing.