Successful Extension of Vascularized Composite Allograft Perfusion Cold Storage to 24 h in a Rat Hindlimb Transplant Model.

Background: Vascularized composite allograft transplantation is a treatment option for complex tissue injuries; however, ischemia reperfusion injury and high acute rejection rates remain a challenge. Hypothermic machine perfusion using acellular storage perfusate is a potential solution. This study evaluated the University of Wisconsin Kidney Preservation Solution-1 (KPS-1) compared with normal saline (NS) for preservation of donor rat hindlimbs subjected to 24 h of ex vivo perfusion cold storage. Methods: Hindlimbs were subjected to 24-h perfusion cold storage with heparinized KPS-1 (n = 6) or heparinized NS (n = 6). Flow, resistance, and pH were measured continuously. At the end of the 24-h period, tissue was collected for histological analysis of edema and apoptosis. Results: KPS-1 perfused limbs showed significantly less edema than the NS group, as evidenced by lower limb weight gain (P < 0.001) and less interfascicular space (P < 0.001). KPS-perfused muscle had significantly less cell death than NS-perfused muscle based on terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick-end labeling (P < 0.001) and cleaved caspase-3 staining (P = 0.045). During hypothermic machine perfusion, a significant decrease in pH over time was detected in both groups, with a significantly greater decline in pH in the KPS-1 group than in the NS group. There were no significant differences overall and over time in flow rate or vascular resistance between the KPS and NS groups. Conclusions: Perfusion with KPS-1 can successfully extend vascularized composite allograft perfusion cold storage for 24 h in a rat hindlimb model without significant edema or cell death.

Living Donor Liver Transplant Center Volume Influences Waiting List Survival Among Children Listed for Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) remains infrequently performed in the United States and localized to a few centers. This study aimed to compare pediatric waiting list and posttransplant outcomes by LDLT center volume. METHODS: The Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network database was retrospectively reviewed for all pediatric (age <18 y) liver transplant candidates listed between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2019. The average annual number of LDLT, deceased donor partial liver transplant (DDPLT), and overall (ie, LDLT + DDPLT + whole liver transplants) pediatric liver transplants performed by each transplant center during the study period was calculated. RESULTS: Of 88 transplant centers, only 44 (50%) performed at least 1 pediatric LDLT during the study period. LDLT, DDPLT, and overall transplant center volume were all positively correlated. LDLT center volume was protective against waiting list dropout after adjusting for confounding variables (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.97; P = 0.004), whereas DDPLT and overall center volume were not ( P > 0.05); however, DDPLT center volume was significantly protective against both recipient death and graft loss, whereas overall volume was only protective against graft loss and LDLT volume was not protective for either. CONCLUSIONS: High-volume pediatric LDLT center can improve waiting list survival, whereas DDPLT and overall volume are associated with posttransplant survival. Expertise in all types of pediatric liver transplant options is important to optimize outcomes.

Are Hepatitis C Positive Female Liver Transplant Recipients Still at Increased Risk for Graft Failure? Reexamining the Disparity in the Modern Era of Direct-acting Antiviral Agents.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the outcomes of hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive (+) female liver transplant recipients to HCV negative (-) female and HCV+ male recipients before and after the direct-acting-antiviral (DAA) era. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplant database was retrospectively reviewed from 2002 to 2017. The DAA era was defined as ≥2014. RESULTS: In the pre-DAA era, HCV+ female recipients had greater risk for graft failure compared with HCV+ male (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.11; P = 0.03) and HCV- female (HR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.43-1.60; P < 0.001) recipients. In the post-DAA era, HCV+ female recipients had lower risk for graft failure compared with HCV+ male recipients (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.70-0.97; P = 0.02) and equivalent outcomes to HCV- female recipients. HCV+ female recipients with graft failure had increased likelihood of graft failure due to disease recurrence compared with HCV+ male recipients in the pre-DAA era (odds ratio, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.08-1.39; P = 0.001) but not in the post-DAA era. CONCLUSIONS: Although historically HCV+ female recipients were at disproportionately increased risk for graft failure and disease recurrence, this disparity has been eliminated in the DAA era.

The Surge in Deceased Liver Donors Due to the Opioid Epidemic: Is It Time to Split the Difference?

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare trends in use of drug overdose (DO) donors in adult versus pediatric liver transplants and the utilization of split liver transplantation in this donor population. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing database was reviewed for deceased donor liver transplants from March 2002 to December 2017. Recipients were categorized by donor mechanism of death. Donor splitting criteria was defined as age <40 y, single vasopressor or less, transaminases no >3 times the normal limit, and body mass index ≤ 28 kg/m2. RESULTS: Adult liver transplants from DO donors increased from 2% in 2002 to 15% in 2017, while pediatric liver transplants from DO donors only increased from <1% to 3% in the same time. While 28% of DO donors met splitting criteria, only 3% of those meeting splitting criteria were used as a split graft. Both pediatric and adult recipients of DO donor livers achieved excellent patient and graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: DO donors are underutilized in pediatric liver transplantation. Increased splitting of DO donor livers could significantly decrease, if not eliminate, the pediatric liver waiting list.

Offspring Versus Nonoffspring to Parent Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Does Donor Relationship Matter?

BACKGROUND: Offspring (donor) to parent (recipient) transplant is the most common form of living donor liver transplant in the United States. In kidney transplantation, it has been suggested that female recipients of offspring living donor kidney allografts have inferior outcomes. It is unknown whether such a phenomenon also occurs following living donor liver transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was completed of recipients of a living donor liver transplant from January 1998 to January 2018 in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database. Patients were grouped as having received a living donor liver allograft from either an offspring or a nonoffspring, with exactly 3 HLA matches, as would be expected between an offspring and parent. Graft and patient survival were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS: A total of 279 offspring to parent and 241 nonoffspring donor liver transplants were included in the analysis. Female recipients of offspring liver allografts had both inferior 10-year graft (52% versus 72%; P < 0.001) and patient survival (52% versus 81%; P < 0.001) compared with female recipients of nonoffspring allografts. No such difference in outcomes was discovered among male recipients. A stratified analysis of sex of offspring donors to female recipients demonstrated that donor male gender was associated with graft failure (HR = 2.87; P = 0.04) and mortality (hazard ratio = 3.89; P = 0.03). Again, this association was not seen with male recipients. CONCLUSIONS: Among female recipients, offspring to parent living donor liver transplantation yields inferior long-term graft and patient survival. Furthermore, among offspring donors, male sex was strongly associated with inferior outcomes. These findings have significant implications for donor selection.