Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 5(8)2016 08 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27503849

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of the change in heart rate from the supine to upright position (∆HR) in patients with chronic heart failure (HF) is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: ∆HR was measured in patients enrolled in the Trial of Intensified Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients with Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) who were in sinus rhythm and had no pacemaker throughout the trial (n=321). The impact of ∆HR on 18-month outcome (HF hospitalization-free survival) was assessed. In addition, the prognostic effect of changes in ∆HR between baseline and month 6 on outcomes in the following 12 months was determined. A lower ∆HR was associated with a higher risk of death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.79 [95% confidence interval {95% CI} 1.19-2.75] if ∆HR ≤3 beats/min [bpm], P=0.004). In the multivariate analysis, lower ∆HR remained an independent predictor of death or HF hospitalization (hazard ratio 1.75 [95% CI, 1.18-2.61] if ∆HR ≤3 bpm, P=0.004) along with ischemic HF etiology, lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, presence and extent of rales, and no baseline ß-blocker use. In patients without event during the first 6 months, the change in ∆HR from baseline to month 6 predicted death or HF hospitalization during the following 12 months (hazard ratio=2.13 [95% CI 1.12-5.00] if rise in ∆HR <2 bpm; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS: ∆HR as a simple bedside test is an independent prognostic predictor in patients with chronic HF. ∆HR is modifiable, and changes in ∆HR also provide prognostic information, which raises the possibility that ∆HR may help to guide treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: www.isrctn.org. Unique identifier: ISRCTN43596477.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Rate/physiology , Posture/physiology , Supine Position/physiology , Aged , Chronic Disease , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Prognosis
2.
JAMA ; 301(4): 383-92, 2009 Jan 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19176440

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: It is uncertain whether intensified heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is superior to symptom-guided therapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare 18-month outcomes of N-terminal BNP-guided vs symptom-guided heart failure therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized controlled multicenter Trial of Intensified vs Standard Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients With Congestive Heart Failure (TIME-CHF) of 499 patients aged 60 years or older with systolic heart failure (ejection fraction < or = 45%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class of II or greater, prior hospitalization for heart failure within 1 year, and N-terminal BNP level of 2 or more times the upper limit of normal. The study had an 18-month follow-up and it was conducted at 15 outpatient centers in Switzerland and Germany between January 2003 and June 2008. INTERVENTION: Uptitration of guideline-based treatments to reduce symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (symptom-guided therapy) and BNP level of 2 times or less the upper limit of normal and symptoms to NYHA class of II or less (BNP-guided therapy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were 18-month survival free of all-cause hospitalizations and quality of life as assessed by structured validated questionnaires. RESULTS: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP and symptom-guided therapy resulted in similar rates of survival free of all-cause hospitalizations (41% vs 40%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.91 [95% CI, 0.72-1.14]; P = .39). Patients' quality-of-life metrics improved over 18 months of follow-up but these improvements were similar in both the N-terminal BNP-guided and symptom-guided strategies. Compared with the symptom-guided group, survival free of hospitalization for heart failure, a secondary end point, was higher among those in the N-terminal BNP-guided group (72% vs 62%, respectively; HR, 0.68 [95% CI, 0.50-0.92]; P = .01). Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP improved outcomes in patients aged 60 to 75 years but not in those aged 75 years or older (P < .02 for interaction) CONCLUSION: Heart failure therapy guided by N-terminal BNP did not improve overall clinical outcomes or quality of life compared with symptom-guided treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN43596477.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Agents/administration & dosage , Heart Failure/blood , Heart Failure/drug therapy , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/blood , Peptide Fragments/blood , Quality of Life , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Aged , Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists , Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Biomarkers/blood , Digoxin/administration & dosage , Disease-Free Survival , Diuretics/administration & dosage , Female , Germany , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Natriuretic Peptide, Brain/drug effects , Nitrates/administration & dosage , Odds Ratio , Peptide Fragments/drug effects , Proportional Hazards Models , Severity of Illness Index , Stroke Volume , Surveys and Questionnaires , Switzerland , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...