Clinical Anatomy of the Superficial Preprostatic Vein and Accessory Pudendal Artery in Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy.

Purpose: We herein describe the superficial preprostatic vein (SPV) anatomy and determine its relationship with the accessory pudendal artery (APA). Materials and Methods: We reviewed 500 patients with localized prostate cancer who underwent conventional robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between April 2019 and March 2023 at our institution. SPV was defined as "any vein coming from the space between the puboprostatic ligaments and running within the retropubic adipose tissue anterior to the prostate toward the vesical venous plexus or pelvic side wall." While APA was defined as "any artery located in the periprostatic region running parallel to the dorsal vascular complex and extending caudal toward the anterior perineum." The intraoperative anatomy of each SPV and APA was described. Results: SPVs had a prevalence rate of 88%. They were preserved in 252 men (58%) and classified as I-, reversed-Y (rY)-, Y-, or H-shaped (64%, 22%, 12%, and 2%, respectively) based on their intraoperative appearance. Overall, 214 APAs were found in 142 of the 252 men with preserved SPV (56%; 165 lateral and 50 apical APAs in 111 and 41 men, respectively). SPVs were pulsatile in 39% men perhaps due to an accompanying tiny artery functioning as a median APA. Pulsations seemed to be initially absent in most SPVs but become apparent late during surgery possibly due to increased arterial and venous blood flow after prostate removal. Pulsations were common in men with ≥1 APA. Conclusions: This study, which described the anatomical variations in arteries and veins around the prostrate and their preservation techniques, revealed that preserving this vasculature may help preserve postprostatectomy erection. ClinicalTrials: The Clinical Research Registration Number is 230523D.

Inguinal hernia leads to worse immediate urinary continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with inguinal hernia (IH) may have voiding dysfunction and weak urethra-stabilizing periurethral fascial tissues, contributing to urinary incontinence. This study aimed to review the association between IH and urinary continence after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS: This single-institution retrospective study included 251 consecutive cases of RARP between April 2019 and June 2022. Patients with concurrent IH or a history of adult IH repair were examined. The urine loss rate (ULR), defined as 24-h urine loss volume divided by the total urine volume immediately after urinary catheter removal (i.e., 6 or 7 postoperative days), was compared between the groups with (n = 33) and without IH (n = 214). Possible contributing factors for ULR were assessed, including age, body mass index (BMI), after benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery, prostate weight, and nerve-sparing. ULR was compared intergroup after propensity score matching countering selection biases. RESULTS: Patients with IH were older (71.3 versus. 66.8 years, p < 0.01), had lower BMI (22.8 versus. 24.3, p < 0.01), and had higher ULR (14.5% versus. 5.1%, p < 0.01). In a multiple linear regression analysis (adjusted R2 = 0.084), IH (p < 0.01) was an independent contributing factor for ULR besides advancing age (p < 0.03). After propensity score matching adjusted for patient's age and nerve-sparing, patients with IH had higher ULR (14.1% versus. 5.7%, p < 0.03) as well. CONCLUSIONS: This study first reported that IH may be one of the risk factors of urinary incontinence after RARP.