Correlation between IRGM genetic polymorphisms and Crohn's disease risk: a meta-analysis of case-control studies.

This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the immunity-related GTPase M (IRGM) gene and the risk of Crohn's disease (CD). Eleven case-control studies were included, for a total of 5183 CD patients and 5571 healthy controls. Three common SNPs (rs13361189 C>T, rs10065172 C>T, and rs4958847 A>G) in the IRGM gene were assessed. We found that the IRGM rs13361189 polymorphism was significantly associated with an increased risk of CD [C allele vs T allele: odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.05-1.61, P = 0.017; CC + CT vs TT: OR = 1.32, 95%CI = 1.06-1.64, P = 0.013]. However, we observed no correlation between the rs10065172 and rs4958847 polymorphisms in the IRGM gene with susceptibility to CD (all P > 0.05). Subgroup analysis by ethnicity revealed significant associations between IRGM genetic polymorphisms and an increased risk of CD among Caucasian populations (C allele vs T allele: OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.07-1.40, P = 0.004; CC + CT vs TT: OR = 1.22, 95%CI = 1.05-1.41, P = 0.009), but not among Asian populations (all P > 0.05). Meta-regression analysis also confirmed that ethnic differences may be an important source of heterogeneity (P = 0.003). Our meta-analysis results indicate that the IRGM rs13361189 polymorphism contributes to the susceptibility to CD. Thus, the IRGM rs13361189 polymorphism is promising as a biomarker for early diagnosis of CD. However, the IRGM rs10065172 and rs4958847 polymorphisms may not be the major determinants of CD risk.

Capecitabine maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer.

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy (CMT) after capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The clinical data of 139 metastatic breast cancer patients treated from March 2008 to May 2012 with capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, we used CMT for 50 patients, while 37 patients were treated with a different (non-CMT) maintenance therapy. We compared time to progression (TTP), objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety of the two groups, and a sub-group analysis was performed according to pathological characteristics. Sixty-four percent of the patients received a median of six cycles of a docetaxel+capecitabine combination chemotherapy regimen (range 1-45); the median TTP (MTTP) for the complete treatment was 9.43 months (95%CI=8.38-10.48 months) for the CMT group and 4.5 months (95%CI=4.22-4.78 months; P=0.004) for the non-CMT group. The MTTPs for the maintenance therapies administered after the initial capecitabine combined chemotherapy were 4.11 months (95%CI=3.34-4.87 months) for the CMT group and 2.0 months (95%CI=1.63-2.38 months) for the non-CMT group. Gastrointestinal side effects, decreased white blood cells and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the main adverse reactions experienced with the combination chemotherapies, CMT and non-CMT treatments. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions were detected in the CMT and non-CMT patients. After initial disease control was achieved with the capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy, CMT can significantly prolong TTP rates with a favorable safety profile.

Capecitabine maintenance therapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic breast cancer

Our objective was to investigate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy (CMT) after capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The clinical data of 139 metastatic breast cancer patients treated from March 2008 to May 2012 with capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. When initial disease control was achieved by the combination chemotherapy, we used CMT for 50 patients, while 37 patients were treated with a different (non-CMT) maintenance therapy. We compared time to progression (TTP), objective response rate, disease control rate, clinical benefit rate, and safety of the two groups, and a sub-group analysis was performed according to pathological characteristics. Sixty-four percent of the patients received a median of six cycles of a docetaxel+capecitabine combination chemotherapy regimen (range 1-45); the median TTP (MTTP) for the complete treatment was 9.43 months (95%CI=8.38-10.48 months) for the CMT group and 4.5 months (95%CI=4.22-4.78 months; P=0.004) for the non-CMT group. The MTTPs for the maintenance therapies administered after the initial capecitabine combined chemotherapy were 4.11 months (95%CI=3.34-4.87 months) for the CMT group and 2.0 months (95%CI=1.63-2.38 months) for the non-CMT group. Gastrointestinal side effects, decreased white blood cells and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia were the main adverse reactions experienced with the combination chemotherapies, CMT and non-CMT treatments. No significant differences in the incidence of adverse reactions were detected in the CMT and non-CMT patients. After initial disease control was achieved with the capecitabine-based combination chemotherapy, CMT can significantly prolong TTP rates with a favorable safety profile.