Clinical association between plan complexity and the local-recurrence-free-survival of non-small-cell lung cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To investigate the clinical impact of plan complexity on the local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS: Data from 123 treatment plans for 113 NSCLC patients were analyzed. Plan-averaged beam modulation (PM), plan beam irregularity (PI), monitor unit/Gy (MU/Gy) and spherical disproportion (SD) were calculated. The γ passing rates (GPR) were measured using ArcCHECK 3D phantom with 2 %/2mm criteria. High complexity (HC) and low complexity (LC) groups were statistically stratified based on the aforementioned metrics, using cutoffs determined by their significance in correlation with survival time, as calculated using the R-3.6.1 packages. Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox regression, and Random Survival Forest (RSF) models were employed for the analysis of local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Propensity-score-matched pairs were generated to minimize bias in the analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up time for all patients was 25.5 months (interquartile range 13.4-41.2). The prognostic capacity of PM was suggested using RSF, based on Variable Importance and Minimal Depth methods. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year LRFS rates in the HC group were significantly lower than those in the LC group (p = 0.023), when plan complexity was defined by PM. However, no significant difference was observed between the HC and LC groups when defined by other metrics (p > 0.05). All γ passing rates exceeded 90.5 %. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a significant association between higher PM and worse LRFS in NSCLC patients treated with SBRT. This finding offers additional clinical evidence supporting the potential optimization of pre-treatment quality assurance protocols.

Simulation of a new respiratory phase sorting method for 4D-imaging using optical surface information towards precision radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory signal detection is critical for 4-dimensional (4D) imaging. This study proposes and evaluates a novel phase sorting method using optical surface imaging (OSI), aiming to improve the precision of radiotherapy. METHOD: Based on 4D Extended Cardiac-Torso (XCAT) digital phantom, OSI in point cloud format was generated from the body segmentation, and image projections were simulated using the geometries of Varian 4D kV cone-beam-CT (CBCT). Respiratory signals were extracted respectively from the segmented diaphragm image (reference method) and OSI respectively, where Gaussian Mixture Model and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) were used for image registration and dimension reduction respectively. Breathing frequencies were compared using Fast-Fourier-Transform. Consistency of 4DCBCT images reconstructed using Maximum Likelihood Expectation Maximization algorithm was also evaluated quantitatively, where high consistency can be suggested by lower Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE), Structural-Similarity-Index (SSIM) value closer to 1, and larger Peak-Signal-To-Noise-Ratio (PSNR) respectively. RESULTS: High consistency of breathing frequencies was observed between the diaphragm-based (0.232 Hz) and OSI-based (0.251 Hz) signals, with a slight discrepancy of 0.019Hz. Using end of expiration (EOE) and end of inspiration (EOI) phases as examples, the mean±1SD values of the 80 transverse, 100 coronal and 120 sagittal planes were 0.967, 0,972, 0.974 (SSIM); 1.657 ± 0.368, 1.464 ± 0.104, 1.479 ± 0.297 (RMSE); and 40.501 ± 1.737, 41.532 ± 1.464, 41.553 ± 1.910 (PSNR) for the EOE; and 0.969, 0.973, 0.973 (SSIM); 1.686 ± 0.278, 1.422 ± 0.089, 1.489 ± 0.238 (RMSE); and 40.535 ± 1.539, 41.605 ± 0.534, 41.401 ± 1.496 (PSNR) for EOI respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This work proposed and evaluated a novel respiratory phase sorting approach for 4D imaging using optical surface signals, which can potentially be applied to precision radiotherapy. Its potential advantages were non-ionizing, non-invasive, non-contact, and more compatible with various anatomic regions and treatment/imaging systems.