Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Actas urol. esp ; 47(9): 581-587, Noviembre 2023. tab
Article in English, Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-227261

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos Si bien la ureteroscopia flexible es una técnica establecida, a día de hoy no existen datos sobre la influencia del sexo del paciente en los resultados y complicaciones. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el papel que desempeña el sexo en la realización de la ureteroscopia flexible a partir de una serie grande de pacientes.MétodosEste estudio analizó retrospectivamente los datos del registro multicéntrico FLEXOR de los pacientes tratados de cálculos renales con CRIR desde enero de 2018 hasta agosto de 2021. Se analizaron los datos demográficos, las características de los cálculos, los hallazgos perioperatorios, los resultados y las complicaciones, y se compararon entre grupos estratificados según el sexo.ResultadosUn total de 6.669 pacientes fueron incluidos, el 66,1% eran varones y el 33,9% mujeres. Las características de los cálculos eran comparables entre los grupos. Las mujeres presentaron tasas significativamente más elevadas de fiebre y urocultivo positivo (12 frente a 8% y 37 frente a 34%). Además, las mujeres tuvieron una estancia hospitalaria ligeramente más larga (3,8 vs. 3,5 días; p < 0,001) y más fragmentos residuales después del procedimiento (23,03 vs. 20,97; p = 0,032). Las complicaciones globales fueron ligeramente superiores en las mujeres (15,74 frente a 14%; p = 0,042), debido principalmente a las tasas de fiebre (6,9 frente a 5,7%); el riesgo de sepsis fue similar en ambos grupos. Según un análisis multivariante, los cálculos de mayor tamaño, múltiples y localizados en el polo inferior parecen tener un efecto negativo en la incidencia de los cálculos residuales y las complicaciones.ConclusiónNuestro estudio de la vida real a nivel mundial refleja que el sexo femenino puede estar correlacionado con unas tasas ligeramente mayores de fragmentos residuales y complicaciones generales de bajo grado. ... (AU)


Introduction and objectives As well established flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). There is still no evidence if gender can have any influence on the outcomes and complication when performing This study aims to evaluate the role that gender has in performing flexible ureteroscopy from a large series of patients.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RIRS for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 within the multicentric FLEXOR registry. Demographics, stone characteristics, perioperative findings, results and complications were analyzed and compared between gender groups.ResultsA total of 6669 patients were included, 66.1% were male and 33.9% were female. Stone characterictis was comparable between groups. Female patients had significant higher fever and positive urine culture rates (12% vs. 8% and 37% vs. 34%). Also, females had a slight longer hospital stay (3.8 vs. 3.5 days; P < 0.001) and more residual fragments after the procedure (23.03% vs. 20.97 (P = 0.032). Overall complications were slightly significantly higher in women (15.74% vs. 14% (P = 0.042)) mainly at the expense of fever rates (6.9% vs. 5.7%) whereas the risk of sepsis was similar in both groups. A multivariate analysis showed that larger stone size, multiple and lower pole stones seem to have a negative impact in the incidence of residual stones and complications.ConclusionOur real life global study reflects that female gender may have a correlation with a slightly increased residual fragment rate and overall low grade complications. However, women can safely be treated with RIRS with no increased the rate of sepsis with appropriate care. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ureteroscopy/statistics & numerical data , Age and Sex Distribution , Kidney Calculi , Retrospective Studies
2.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 47(9): 581-587, 2023 11.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37369300

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: As well established flexible ureteroscopy (RIRS). There is still no evidence if gender can have any influence on the outcomes and complication when performing. This study aims to evaluate the role that gender has in performing flexible ureteroscopy from a large series of patients. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent RIRS for renal stones from January 2018 to August 2021 within the multicentric FLEXOR registry. Demographics, stone characteristics, perioperative findings, results and complications were analyzed and compared between gender groups. RESULTS: A total of 6669 patients were included, 66.1% were male and 33.9% were female. Stone characteristics was comparable between groups. Female patients had significant higher fever and positive urine culture rates (12% vs. 8% and 37% vs. 34%). Also, females had a slight longer hospital stay (3.8 vs. 3.5 days; P < 0.001) and more residual fragments after the procedure (23.03% vs. 20.97 (P = 0.032). Overall complications were slightly significantly higher in women (15.74% vs. 14% (P = 0.042)) mainly at the expense of fever rates (6.9% vs. 5.7%) whereas the risk of sepsis was similar in both groups. A multivariate analysis showed that larger stone size, multiple and lower pole stones seem to have a negative impact in the incidence of residual stones and complications. CONCLUSION: Our real life global study reflects that female gender may have a correlation with a slightly increased residual fragment rate and overall low grade complications. However, women can safely be treated with RIRS with no increased the rate of sepsis with appropriate care.


Subject(s)
Kidney Calculi , Sepsis , Humans , Male , Female , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects , Ureteroscopy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Kidney Calculi/surgery , Ureteroscopes
3.
Actas urol. esp ; 45(1): 0-0, ene.-feb. 2021. tab, mapas, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-194903

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVO: La pandemia de la COVID-19 ha alterado sustancialmente las actividades de formación de los residentes. Si bien recientemente se han implementado nuevos programas de aprendizaje virtual, aún debe investigarse su utilidad desde la perspectiva de los aprendices de urología. MÉTODOS: Encuesta online transversal de 30 ítems, distribuida a través de Twitter, entre el 4 y el 18 de abril de 2020, con el objetivo de evaluar la perspectiva de los residentes de urología sobre las modalidades (videos pregrabados, seminarios web, podcasts y redes sociales [RRSS]) y contenidos (lecciones frontales, discusiones de casos clínicos, actualizaciones sobre guías y ensayos clínicos, videos quirúrgicos, clubes de revistas y seminarios sobre liderazgo y habilidades no técnicas) del aprendizaje inteligente (Smart learning). RESULTADOS: En total, 501 residentes de urología de 58 países completaron la encuesta. De estos, 78,4, 78,2, 56,9 y 51,9% consideraron los videos pregrabados, seminarios web interactivos, podcasts y RRSS, respectivamente, como modalidades de aprendizaje inteligente muy útiles. Los contenidos considerados como muy útiles por la mayor proporción de residentes fueron las actualizaciones de guías clínicas (84,8%) y videos quirúrgicos (81,0%). Además, más de la mitad de los residentes consideraron los seminarios de liderazgo y los de habilidades no técnicas (58,9 y 56,5%, respectivamente) como contenidos útiles para el aprendizaje inteligente. Las tres combinaciones preferidas de modalidad y contenido de aprendizaje inteligente fueron: videos quirúrgicos pregrabados, seminarios web interactivos sobre casos clínicos y videos pregrabados sobre guías. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestro estudio proporciona la primera «visión global» de las modalidades y contenidos de aprendizaje inteligente que deben priorizarse con el objetivo de optimizar la educación virtual en urología. Aunque este estudio se llevó a cabo durante la pandemia de la COVID-19, nuestros hallazgos podrían tener un impacto aún mayor en el futuro


PURPOSE: The COVID-19 outbreak has substantially altered residents' training activities. While several new virtual learning programs have been recently implemented, the perspective of urology trainees regarding their usefulness still needs to be investigated. METHODS: A cross-sectional, 30-item, web-based Survey was conducted through Twitter from April 4th, 2020 to April 18th, 2020, aiming to evaluate the urology residents' perspective on smart learning (SL) modalities (pre-recorded videos, webinars, podcasts, and social media [SoMe]), and contents (frontal lessons, clinical case discussions, updates on Guidelines and on clinical trials, surgical videos, Journal Clubs, and seminars on leadership and non-technical skills). RESULTS: Overall, 501 urology residents from 58 countries completed the survey. Of these, 78.4, 78.2, 56.9 and 51.9% of them considered pre-recorded videos, interactive webinars, podcasts and SoMe highly useful modalities of smart learning, respectively. The contents considered as highly useful by the greatest proportion of residents were updates on guidelines (84.8%) and surgical videos (81.0%). In addition, 58.9 and 56.5% of responders deemed seminars on leadership and on non-technical skills highly useful smart learning contents. The three preferred combinations of smart learning modality and content were: pre-recorded surgical videos, interactive webinars on clinical cases, and pre-recorded videos on guidelines. CONCLUSION: Our study provides the first global «big picture» of the smart learning modalities and contents that should be prioritized to optimize virtual Urology education. While this survey was conducted during the COVID-19 outbreak, our findings might have even more impact in the future


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Health Education/methods , Coronavirus Infections , Urology/education , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Education, Distance , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral , Internship and Residency/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Telemedicine , Urologic Surgical Procedures/education
4.
Actas urol. esp ; 44(10): 644-652, dic. 2020. ilus, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-195507

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: La telemedicina ofrece un soporte clínico remoto utilizando herramientas tecnológicas. Puede facilitar la atención médica al tiempo que reduce las visitas innecesarias a la consulta. La pandemia COVID-19 ha provocado un cambio brusco en nuestra práctica urológica diaria convirtiéndose en algo muy necesario el acto de la teleconsulta. OBJETIVO: Proporcionar recomendaciones prácticas para el uso efectivo de herramientas tecnológicas en telemedicina. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: Se realizó una búsqueda en la literatura en la plataforma Medline hasta abril de 2020; seleccionamos los artículos más relevantes relacionados con «telemedicina» y «trabajo inteligente» que podrían proporcionar información útil. RESULTADOS: La telemedicina se refiere al uso de la información electrónica y a las herramientas de telecomunicaciones para proporcionar apoyo clínico remoto a la atención médica. El trabajo inteligente es un modelo de trabajo que utiliza tecnologías nuevas o existentes para mejorar el rendimiento. La telemedicina se está convirtiendo en una herramienta útil y necesaria durante la pandemia COVID-19 e incluso más allá de la misma. Es hora de que formalicemos y demos el lugar que se merece a la telemedicina en nuestra práctica clínica y es nuestra responsabilidad adaptar y conocer todas las herramientas y posibles estrategias para su implementación de una manera óptima, garantizar una atención de calidad a los pacientes y que dicha atención sea percibida por pacientes y familiares como de alto nivel. CONCLUSIONES: La telemedicina facilita la atención clínica urológica especializada a distancia y resuelve problemas como las limitaciones en la movilidad o el traslado de los pacientes, reduce las visitas innecesarias a las clínicas y es útil para reducir el riesgo de transmisión viral de la COVID-19


INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine provides remote clinical support through technology tools. It can facilitate medical care delivery while reducing unnecessary office visits. The COVID-19 outbreak has caused an abrupt change in our daily urological practice, where teleconsultations play a crucial role. OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the effective use of technological tools in telemedicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Medline until April 2020. We selected the most relevant articles related to «telemedicine» and «smart working» that could provide valuable information. RESULTS: Telemedicine refers to the use of electronic information and telecommunication tools to provide remote clinical health care support. Smart working is a working approach that uses new or existing technologies to improve performance. Telemedicine is becoming a useful and fundamental tool during the COVID-19 pandemic and will be even more in the future. It is time for us to officially give telemedicine the place it deserves in clinical practice, and it is our responsibility to adapt and familiarize with all the tools and possible strategies for its optimal implementation. We must guarantee that the quality of care received by patients and perceived by them and their families is of the highest standard. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine facilitates remote specialized urological clinical support and solves problems caused by limited patient mobility or transfer, reduces unnecessary visits to clinics and is useful to reduce the risk of COVID-19 viral transmission


Subject(s)
Humans , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Pandemics , Betacoronavirus , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/standards , Urology/methods , Air Pollution/prevention & control , Appointments and Schedules , Confidentiality , Diagnostic Techniques, Urological , Electronic Health Records , Urology/organization & administration , Urology/standards , Informed Consent , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care , Societies, Medical , Triage/methods , Europe/epidemiology
5.
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed) ; 44(10): 644-652, 2020 Dec.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33012592

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Telemedicine provides remote clinical support through technology tools. It can facilitate medical care delivery while reducing unnecessary office visits. The COVID-19 outbreak has caused an abrupt change in our daily urological practice, where teleconsultations play a crucial role. OBJECTIVE: To provide practical recommendations for the effective use of technological tools in telemedicine. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Medline until April 2020. We selected the most relevant articles related to «telemedicine¼ and «smart working¼ that could provide valuable information. RESULTS: Telemedicine refers to the use of electronic information and telecommunication tools to provide remote clinical health care support. Smart working is a working approach that uses new or existing technologies to improve performance. Telemedicine is becoming a useful and fundamental tool during the COVID-19 pandemic and will be even more in the future. It is time for us to officially give telemedicine the place it deserves in clinical practice, and it is our responsibility to adapt and familiarize with all the tools and possible strategies for its optimal implementation. We must guarantee that the quality of care received by patients and perceived by them and their families is of the highest standard. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine facilitates remote specialized urological clinical support and solves problems caused by limited patient mobility or transfer, reduces unnecessary visits to clinics and is useful to reduce the risk of COVID-19 viral transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine , Urology/methods , Air Pollution/prevention & control , Appointments and Schedules , Confidentiality , Diagnostic Techniques, Urological , Electronic Health Records , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Informed Consent , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care , Societies, Medical , Telemedicine/organization & administration , Telemedicine/standards , Triage/methods , Urology/organization & administration , Urology/standards
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL