ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Central to neurosurgical care, neurosurgical education is particularly needed in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where opportunities for neurosurgical training are limited due to social and economic constraints and an inadequate workforce. The present paper aims (1) to evaluate the validity and usability of a cadaver-free hybrid system in the context of LMICs and (2) to report their learning needs and whether the courses meet those needs via a comprehensive survey. METHODS: From April to November 2021, a non-profit initiative consisting of a series of innovative cadaver-free courses based on virtual and practical training was organized. This project emerged from a collaboration between the Young Neurosurgeons Forum of the World Federation of Neurological Societies (WFNS), the NIHR Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, and UpSurgeOn, an Italian hi-tech company specialized in simulation technologies, creator of the UpSurgeOn Box, a hyper-realistic simulator of cranial approaches fused with augmented reality. Over that period, 11 cadaver-free courses were held in LMICs using remote hands-on Box simulators. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight participants completed an online survey after course completion of the course. The anatomical accuracy of simulators was overall rated high by the participant. The simulator provided a challenging but manageable learning curve, and 86% of participants found the Box to be very intuitive to use. When asked if the sequence of mental training (app), hybrid training (Augmented Reality), and manual training (the Box) was an effective method of training to fill the gap between theoretical knowledge and practice on a real patient/cadaver, 83% of participants agreed. Overall, the hands-on activities on the simulators have been satisfactory, as well as the integration between physical and digital simulation. CONCLUSIONS: This project demonstrated that a cadaver-free hybrid (virtual/hands-on) training system could potentially participate in accelerating the learning curve of neurosurgical residents, especially in the setting of limited training possibilities such as LMICs, which were only worsened during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
Developing Countries , Pandemics , Humans , Neurosurgeons , Computer Simulation , Learning CurveABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To describe a case series of children with thalamic tumors treated at our institution in a 5-year period. METHOD: A retrospective and observational study was performed. The records of 15 patients between 2013 and 2018 were analyzed. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2018, 15 patients were treated at our institution. The male to female index was 1.5, and the median age was 8.9 (IQR 4.75-13). Seven (46%) tumors were left-sided, seven (46%) were right-sided, and one (6%) was bilateral. All patients were symptomatic at the time of treatment. Motor deficit was the most common form of presentation (73%). Gross-total resection was performed in two (13.3%) patients, subtotal resection was performed in two other patients (13.3%), and for the rest of the patients (73.3%), the chosen surgical approach was a stereotactic-guided biopsy. The average of procedures was 3.4, mostly related to the treatment for hydrocephalus. Twelve patients (80%) received treatment for hydrocephalus. Nine patients (75%) were treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunts, and four patients (33%) underwent endoscopic third ventriculostomy. High-grade tumors predominated. Grade IV tumors were diagnosed in six patients (40%), followed by grade III in four patients (26.6%), grade II in three (20%) patients, and grade I in two (13.3%) patients. Chemotherapy was given in 93% of the cases, being temozolomide, the most used drug. CONCLUSION: The clinical and surgical approaches for thalamic tumors in children have changed over time. At our institution, the lesser invasive surgical procedures are now being used more frequently.