Investigation of screening questions to identify insomnia in cancer patients.

The high prevalence of insomnia in cancer patients leads to a significant reduction in the quality of life of those affected. A detailed record of symptoms therefore plays an essential role for further course of treatment. Which screening instruments enable identification of cancer patients with insomnia is the subject of this single-arm nonrandomized study. During the data collection period, cancer patients meeting the following criteria: self-reported tiredness and/or trouble falling or staying asleep or sleeping too much in an electronic patient-reported outcome measurement were enrolled. For further analysis, focus was placed on the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8), the Minimal Documentation System (MIDOS2) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI). Frequency, correlation, and variance analyses were conducted to identify likely predictors of insomnia. Our findings indicate a closer correlation between the screening question pertaining to sleep disorders and the ISI, compared to the question on tiredness and the ISI. The initial recording of sleep-related parameters plays an essential role for cancer patients in order to identify and treat modifiable factors as promptly as possible. For an initial assessment, we recommend asking about trouble falling or staying asleep or sleeping too much.

Impact of encorafenib on survival of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer in a real-world setting.

PURPOSE: Patients with BRAFV600E-mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have a dismal prognosis. The best strategies in these patients remain elusive. Against this background, we report the clinical course of patients with BRAFV600E-mutant mCRC to retrieve the best treatment strategy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Clinico-pathological data were extracted from the electronic health records. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. RESULTS: In total, 51 patients were enrolled. FOLFOXIRI was administered to 12 patients; 29 patients received FOLFOX or FOLFIRI as first-line treatment. Median OS was 17.6 months. Median PFS with FOLFOXIRI (13.0 months) was significantly prolonged (HR 0.325) as compared to FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (4.3 months). However, this failed to translate into an OS benefit (p = 0.433). Interestingly, addition of a monoclonal antibody to chemotherapy associated with superior OS (HR 0.523). A total of 64.7% patients received further-line therapy, which included a BRAF inhibitor in 17 patients. Targeted therapy associated with very favourable OS (25.1 months). CONCLUSION: Patients with BRAFV600E-mutated mCRC benefit from the addition of an antibody to first-line chemotherapy. Further-line treatment including a BRAF inhibitor has a dramatic impact on survival.

A prognostic systemic inflammation score (SIS) in patients with advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Systemic-inflammatory response parameters (SIR) are known prognostic markers in different tumour entities, but have not been evaluated in patients with iCCA treated with systemic chemotherapy. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of different SIR markers on the clinical course of patients with advanced iCCA treated at our center. METHODS: SIR markers were retrospectively evaluated in 219 patients with iCCA at the West-German-Cancer-Center Essen from 2014 to 2019. Markers included neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte/monocyte ratio (LMR), CRP, and the modified Glasgow-Prognostic-Score (mGPS), which were correlated with clinico-pathological findings, response to chemotherapy (ORR), progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier analyses, and Cox proportional models. RESULTS: Median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was 14.8 months (95% CI 11.2-24.4). Median disease-free survival (DFS) in 81 patients undergoing resection was 12.3 months (95% CI 9.7-23.1). The median OS from start of palliative CTX (OSpall) was 10.9 months (95% 9.4-14.6). A combined Systemic Inflammatory Score (SIS) comprising all evaluated SIR markers correlated significantly with ORR, PFS, and OSpall. Patients with a high SIS (≥ 2) vs. SIS 0 had a significantly inferior OSpall (HR 8.7 95% CI 3.71-20.38, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis including known prognostic markers (ECOG, CA19-9, LDH, and N- and M-status) identified the SIS as an independent prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory markers associate with inferior survival outcomes in patients with iCCA. A simple SIS may guide treatment decisions in patients treated with systemic chemotherapy.