Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Early versus Late Debridement of Superficial Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Tears.

Background: While initial nonoperative management is the conventional approach for superficial triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) tears, a substantial portion of these cases go on to require surgery, and the optimal duration of nonoperative treatment is unknown. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early versus late arthroscopic debridement for the treatment of superficial TFCC tears without distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) instability. Methods: We created a decision tree to compare the following strategies from a healthcare payer perspective: immediate arthroscopic debridement versus immobilization for 4 or 6 weeks with late debridement as needed. Costs were obtained from the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services and a national administrative claims database. Probabilities and health-related quality-of-life measures were obtained from published sources. We conducted sensitivity analyses on model inputs, including a probabilistic sensitivity analysis consisting of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Results: Immobilization for 6 weeks while reserving arthroscopic debridement for refractory cases was both the least costly and most effective strategy. Immediate arthroscopic debridement became cost-effective when success rates of immobilization for 4 or 6 weeks were less than 7.7 or 10.5%, respectively. Our probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that immobilization for 6 weeks was preferred 97.6% of the time, and immobilization for 4 weeks was preferred 2.4% of the time. Conclusion: Although various early and late debridement strategies can be used to treat superficial TFCC tears without DRUJ instability, immobilization for 6 weeks while reserving arthroscopic debridement for refractory cases is the optimal strategy from a cost-effectiveness standpoint.

Oral Prednisone Use Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Increase Infections, But Can be Associated with Higher Risk for Medical and Surgical Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative use of oral prednisone to augment the effect of multimodal pain regimens after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has increased in popularity. However, data on the risks of its utilization, especially as it relates to infection, has been lacking. We tested the null hypothesis that perioperative prednisone use is not associated with the incidence of surgical and medical complications after TKA. METHODS: Using a national administrative claims database, we identified 949,555 patients undergoing primary TKA. We excluded patients who filled oral prednisone prescriptions within 90 days prior to surgery or between 90 and 364 days after surgery. Patients who had acute prednisone use were defined as those who filled prednisone prescriptions only within 30 days after surgery. Outcomes consisted of surgical and medical complications after TKA. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between acute prednisone use and complications, adjusting for age, sex, region, insurance plan, and Elixhauser comorbidities. RESULTS: Patients in the acute prednisone cohort had greater adjusted odds of subsequent manipulation under anesthesia (adjusted OR [odds ratio] = 1.23 [95% CI (confidence interval): 1.09 to 1.38]; P < 0.001) and lysis of adhesions (adjusted OR = 1.58 [95% CI: 1.02 to 2.33]; P = 0.03) compared to patients who did not have acute prednisone use. Patients who had acute prednisone use also had greater adjusted odds of acute kidney injury (adjusted OR = 1.47 [95% CI: 1.25 to 1.71]; P < 0.001) and pneumonia (adjusted OR = 4.04 [95% CI: 3.53 to 4.59]; P < 0.001). There was no increased incidence of infection. CONCLUSION: Prednisone use shortly following TKA may be associated with a higher incidence of certain surgical and medical complications, but without increased risk for infection. However, given these risks, the optimal patient profile for postoperative prednisone use remains to be defined.

Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Acetabular Fracture is Associated with a High Risk of Revision, Dislocation, and Periprosthetic Fracture.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes between acute, subacute, and delayed arthroplasty for acetabular fractures occurring within one week, from one week to six months, or longer than six months before the index total hip arthroplasty (THA), versus THA without a history of acetabular fracture as a control. METHODS: We analyzed the records of patients undergoing primary THA who were enrolled in a national database for at least two years before and after the index procedure. Patients who had an initial diagnostic code for acetabular fracture occurring less than one week, from one week to six months, or at least more than six months before the THA were classified as acute THA (aTHA), subacute (saTHA), or delayed (dTHA), respectively. The control group was patients undergoing THA who did not have a history of acetabular fracture. There were 430,349 control primary THAs, 462 aTHAs, 675 saTHAs, and 1,162 dTHAs. RESULTS: After adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities, patients who had an aTHA and saTHA experienced statistically significant increased odds of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fracture compared to primary THA without a history of acetabular fracture. Similarly, dTHA was associated with increased odds of revision, dislocation, and periprosthetic fractures compared to primary THA. In the multivariate analysis, aTHA had statistically significant higher rates of dislocation when compared to dTHA. CONCLUSION: Patients who had a history of acetabular fractures undergoing aTHA, saTHA, or dTHA have significantly increased rates of revision, periprosthetic fracture, and dislocation compared to primary THA in those who did not have a history of acetabular fractures.

Site of Service Disparities Exist for Total Joint Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The rate of outpatient total joint arthroplasty procedures, including those performed at ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs) and hospital outpatient departments, is increasing. The purpose of this study was to analyze if type of insurance is associated with site of service (in-patient vs outpatient) for total joint arthroplasty and adverse outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), total knee arthroplasty (TKA), or total hip arthroplasty (THA) using Current Procedural Terminology codes in a national administrative claims database. Eligible patients were stratified by type of insurance (Medicaid, Medicare, private). The primary outcome was site of service. Secondary outcomes included general complications, procedural complications, and revision procedures. We evaluated the associations using adjusted multivariable logistic regression models. RESULTS: We identified 951,568 patients for analysis; 46,703 (4.9%) patients underwent UKA, 607,221 (63.8%) underwent TKA, and 297,644 (31.3%) underwent THA. Overall, 9.6% of procedures were outpatient. Patients with Medicaid were less likely than privately insured patients to receive outpatient UKA or THA (UKA: odds ratio [OR], 0.729 [95% CI, 0.640-0.829]; THA: OR, 0.625 [95% CI, 0.557-0.702]) but more likely than patients with Medicare to receive outpatient TKA or THA (TKA: OR, 1.391 [95% CI, 1.315-1.472]; THA: OR, 1.327 [95% CI, 1.166-1.506]). Patients with Medicaid were more likely to experience complications and revision procedures. CONCLUSION: Differences in site of service and complication rates following hip and knee arthroplasty exist based on type of insurance, suggesting a disparity in care. Further exploration of drivers of this disparity is warranted and can inform interventions (eg, progressive value-based payments) to support equity in orthopedic services. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):179-184.].

Is There Variation in Time to and Type of Treatment for Hip Osteoarthritis Based on Insurance?

BACKGROUND: Disparities in care access based on insurance exist for total hip arthroplasty (THA), but it is unclear if these lead to longer times to surgery. We evaluated whether rates of THA versus nonoperative interventions (NOI) and time to THA from initial hip osteoarthritis (OA) diagnosis vary by insurance type. METHODS: Using a national claims database, patients who had hip OA undergoing THA or NOI from 2011 to 2019 were identified and divided by insurance type: Medicaid-managed care; Medicare Advantage; and commercial insurance. The primary outcome was THA incidence within 3 years after hip OA diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression models were created to assess the association between THA and insurance type, adjusting for age, sex, region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Medicaid patients had lower rates of THA within 3 years of initial diagnosis (7.4 versus 10.9 or 12.0%, respectively; P < .0001) and longer times to surgery (297 versus 215 or 261 days, respectively; P < .0001) compared to Medicare Advantage and commercially-insured patients. In multivariable analyses, Medicaid patients were also less likely to receive THA (odds ratio (OR) = 0.62 [95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.60 to 0.64] versus Medicare Advantage, OR = 0.63 [95% CI: 0.61 to 0.64] versus commercial) or NOI (OR = 0.92 [95% CI: 0.91 to 0.94] versus Medicare Advantage, OR = 0.81 [95% CI: 0.79 to 0.82] versus commercial). CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid patients experienced lower rates of and longer times to THA than Medicare Advantage or commercially-insured patients. Further investigation into causes of these disparities, such as costs or access barriers, is necessary to ensure equitable care.

Medicaid Insurance is Associated With Decreased MRI Use for Ankle Sprains Compared With Private Insurance: A Retrospective Database Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Advanced imaging modalities are expensive, and access to advanced imaging services may vary by socioeconomic factors, creating the potential for unwarranted variations in care. Ankle sprains are a common injury for which variations in MRI use can occur, both via underuse of indicated MRIs (appropriate use) and overuse of nonindicated MRIs (inappropriate use). High-value, equitable healthcare would decrease inappropriate use and increase appropriate use of MRI for this common injury. It is unknown whether socioeconomic factors are associated with underuse of indicated MRIs and overuse of nonindicated MRIs for ankle sprains. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Using ankle sprains as a paradigm injury, given their high population incidence, we asked: (1) Does MRI use for ankle sprains vary by insurance type? (2) After controlling for relevant confounding variables, did patients who received an MRI have higher odds of undergoing ankle surgery? METHODS: Between 2011 and 2019, a total of 6,710,223 patients were entered into the PearlDiver Mariner Patient Records Database with a diagnosis of ankle sprain. We considered patients with continuous enrollment in the database for at least 1 year before and 2 years after the diagnosis as potentially eligible. Based on that, 68% (4,567,106) were eligible; a further 20% (1,372,478) were excluded because of age younger than 18 years, age at least 65 years with Medicaid insurance, or age < 65 years with Medicare insurance. Another 0.1% (9169) had incomplete data, leaving 47% (3,185,459) for analysis here. Patients with Medicaid insurance differed from patients with Medicare Advantage or private insurance with respect to age, gender, region, and comorbidity burden. The primary outcome was ankle MRI occurring within 12 months after diagnosis. The use of ankle surgery after MRI in each cohort was measured as a secondary outcome. We used multivariable logistic regression models to evaluate the association between insurance type and MRI use while adjusting for age, gender, region, and comorbidity burden. Separate multivariable regression models were created to evaluate the association between receiving an MRI and subsequent ankle surgery for each insurance type, adjusting for age, gender, region, and comorbidity burden. Within 12 months of an ankle sprain diagnosis, 1% (3522 of 339,457) of patients with Medicaid, 2% (44,793 of 2,627,288) of patients with private insurance, and 1% (1660 of 218,714) of patients with Medicare Advantage received an MRI. RESULTS: After controlling for age, gender, region, and comorbidity burden, patients with Medicaid had lower odds of receiving an MRI within 12 months after ankle sprain diagnosis than patients with private insurance (odds ratio 0.60 [95% confidence interval 0.57 to 0.62]; p < 0.001). Patients with Medicaid who received an MRI had higher adjusted odds of undergoing subsequent ankle surgery (OR 23 [95% CI 21 to 26]; p < 0.001) than patients with private insurance (OR 12.7 [95% CI 12 to 13]; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although absolute MRI use was generally low, there was substantial relative variation by insurance type. Given the high incidence of ankle sprains in the general population, these relative differences can translate to tens of thousands of MRIs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the reasons for decreased appropriate MRI use in patients with Medicaid and overuse of MRI in patients with private insurance. The establishment of clinical practice guidelines by orthopaedic professional societies and more stringent gatekeeping for MRI use by health insurers could reduce unwarranted variations in MRI use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.

Variations in Treatment and Costs for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 55 Years of Age: A Population-Based Study.

Objective To evaluate the rate of surgery for symptomatic malunion after nonoperatively treated distal radius fractures in patients aged 55 and above, and to secondarily report differences in demographics, geographical variation, and utilization costs of patients requiring subsequent malunion correction. Methods We identified patients aged 55 and above who underwent nonoperative treatment for a distal radius fracture between 2007 and 2016 using the IBM MarketScan database. In the nonoperative cohort, we identified patients who underwent malunion correction between 3 months and 1 year after distal radius fracture. The primary outcome was rate of malunion correction. Multivariable logistic regression controlling for sex, region, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) was used. We also report patient demographics, geographical variation, and utilization cost. Results The rate of subsequent malunion surgery after nonoperative treatment was 0.58%. The cohort undergoing malunion surgery was younger and had a lower ECI. For every 1-year increase in age, there was a 6.4% decrease in odds of undergoing surgery for malunion, controlling for sex, region, and ECI (odds ratio = 0.94 [0.93-0.95]; p < 0.01). The southern United States had the highest percentage of patients initially managed operatively (30.7%), the Northeast had the lowest (22.0%). Patients who required a malunion procedure incurred higher costs compared with patients who did not ($7,272 ± 8,090 vs. $2,209 ± 5,940; p < 0.01). Conclusion The rate of surgery for symptomatic malunion after initial nonoperative treatment for distal radius fractures in patients aged 55 and above is low. As younger and healthier patients are more likely to undergo malunion correction with higher associated costs, surgeons may consider offering this cohort surgical treatment initially.

Strategies for Perioperative Optimization in Upper Extremity Fracture Care.

Perioperative optimization in upper extremity fracture care must balance the need for timely treatment with the benefits of medical optimization. Care pathways directed at optimizing glycemic control, chronic anticoagulation, smoking history, nutrition, and frailty can reduce surgical risk in upper extremity fracture care. The development of multidisciplinary approaches that tie risk modification with risk stratification is needed.

The Influence of Out-of-Pocket Cost on Wrist Fracture Treatment Selection.

PURPOSE: Patient-centered care prioritizes patients' specific health needs and desired outcomes based on their preferences, values, and goals. The aim of this study was to evaluate nonclinical factors that affect decision-making related to wrist fracture treatment options. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was administered via Amazon Mechanical Turk. Participants chose between two treatment options for theoretical wrist fractures. Each choice set contained three levels for four attributes-total out-of-pocket cost, length of cast immobilization, time to return to work, and number of posttreatment follow-up visits-determined using Medicare national average out-of-pocket costs and a range of standard treatment options. Financial stress was evaluated using the InCharge Financial Distress/Financial Well-Being Scale. RESULTS: A total of 232 responses were collected. The average financial stress score was 6.29 (SD, 1.97), with 22% (52/232) being classified as financially distressed (score < 5.00). Twenty-eight percent of the participants (n = 64) always chose the lowest cost option, and two participants (0.01%) always chose less time in a cast. Over one-third of the participants chose the cheaper monetary option 80% of the time or more. The odds of choosing a lower cost option were 1.06 times greater per $100 decrease in cost in the entire cohort and 1.03 times greater among 166 participants who did not always choose the least expensive option. In monetary terms, relative importance showed that the participants were willing to pay $19.48 and $58.37 for a week less of cast immobilization and out of work, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the important role that out-of-pocket cost plays in decision-making compared with the nonclinical components of two equivalent treatment options. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Providers should be cognizant of the cost associated with treatment options so that information on treatment cost can be incorporated into counseling and shared decision-making with patients undergoing hand surgery.

Is outpatient spine surgery associated with new, persistent opioid use in opioid-naïve patients? A retrospective national claims database analysis.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Although spine procedures have historically been performed inpatient, there has been a recent shift to the outpatient setting for selected cases due to increased patient satisfaction and reduced cost. Effective postoperative pain management while limiting over-prescribing of opioids, which may lead to persistent opioid use, is critical to performing spine surgery in the outpatient setting. PURPOSE: To assess if there is an increased risk for new, persistent opioid use between inpatient and outpatient spine procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis using national administrative claims database. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 390,049 opioid-naïve patients with a perioperative opioid prescription who underwent an inpatient or outpatient spine surgery. OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients with perioperative opioid prescriptions who filled ≥ 1 opioid prescription between 90- and 180-days following surgery were defined as new, persistent opioid users. METHODS: We utilized a claims database to identify opioid-naïve patients who underwent lumbar or cervical fusion, total disc arthroplasty, or decompression procedures. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between inpatient versus outpatient surgery and the development of new, persistent opioid use while adjusting for several patient factors. RESULTS: A total of 19,205 (11.7%) inpatient and 18,546 (8.2%) outpatient patients developed new, persistent opioid use. Outpatient lumbar and cervical spine surgery patients were significantly less likely to develop new, persistent opioid use following surgery compared to inpatient spine surgery patients (OR = 0.71 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.69, 0.73], p < .001). Average morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) (inpatient = 1,476 MME +/- 22.7, outpatient = 1,072 MME +/- 18.5, p < .001) and average MMEs per day (inpatient = 91.6 MME +/- 0.32, outpatient = 77.7 MME +/- 0.28, p < .001) were lower in the outpatient cohort compared to the inpatient. CONCLUSION: Our results support the shift from inpatient to outpatient spine procedures, as outpatient procedures were not associated with an increased risk for new, persistent opioid use. As more patients become candidates for outpatient spine surgery, predictors of new, persistent opioid use should be considered during risk stratification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III Prognostic Study. MINI ABSTRACT: We utilized a national administrative claims database to identify opioid-naïve patients who underwent common spine procedures. Outpatient lumbar and cervical spine surgery patients were significantly less likely to be new, persistent opioid users following surgery compared to inpatient spine surgery patients. Our results support the shift to outpatient spine procedures.

The Use and Downstream Associations of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Lateral Epicondylitis.

PURPOSE: Low-value imaging is associated with wasteful health care spending and patient harm. The routine use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the work-up of lateral epicondylitis is an example of low-value imaging. As such, our aim was to investigate the use of MRIs ordered for lateral epicondylitis, the characteristics of those undergoing an MRI, and the downstream associations of MRI with other care. METHODS: We identified patients aged ≥18 years with a diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis between 2010 and 2019 using a Humana claims database. We identified patients with a Current Procedural Terminology code corresponding to an elbow MRI. We analyzed the use and downstream treatment cascades in those undergoing MRI. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess the odds of undergoing an MRI, adjusting for age, sex, insurance type, and comorbidity index. Separate multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the association between undergoing an MRI and the incidence of secondary outcomes (eg, receiving surgery). RESULTS: A total of 624,102 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of 8,209 (1.3%) patients undergoing MRI, 3,584 (44%) underwent it within 90 days after diagnosis. There was notable regional variation in MRI use. The MRIs were ordered most frequently by primary care specialties and for younger, female, commercially insured, and patients with more comorbidities. Performance of an MRI was associated with an increase in downstream treatments, including surgery (odds ratio [OR], 9.58 [9.12-10.07]), injection (OR, 2.90 [2.77-3.04]), therapy (OR, 1.81 [1.72-1.91]), and cost ($134 per patient). CONCLUSIONS: Although there is variation in the use of MRI for lateral epicondylitis and its use is associated with downstream effects, the routine use of MRI for the diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis is low. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The routine use of MRI for lateral epicondylitis is low. Understanding interventions to minimize such low-value care in lateral epicondylitis can be used to inform improvement efforts to minimize low-value care for other conditions.

Disparities in Treatment of Closed Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged 18-64 Years and ≥65 Years by Insurance Type.

PURPOSE: Type of and time to definitive treatment for distal radius fractures can influence the outcomes. The impact of social determinants of health (eg, insurance type) on distal radius fracture care remains unknown despite having health equity implications. Thus, we evaluate the association between insurance type and rate of surgery, the time to surgery, and the complication rate for distal radius fractures. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the PearlDiver Database. We identified adults with closed distal radius fractures. Patients were divided into subgroups by age (18-64 years, 65+ years) and further stratified on the basis of the insurance type (Medicare Advantage, Medicaid-managed care, and commercial). The primary outcome was the rate of surgical fixation. Secondary outcomes included the time to surgery and 12-month complication rates. Logistic regression modeling was used to calculate the odds ratios for each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, geographic region, and comorbidities. RESULTS: In patients aged ≥65 years, a lower proportion of Medicaid patients underwent surgery within 21 days of diagnosis compared with Medicare or commercially insured patients (12.1% vs 15.9% or 17.5%, respectively). Complication rates did not differ between Medicaid and other insurance types. In patients aged <65 years, fewer Medicaid patients underwent surgery compared with commercially insured patients (16.2% vs 21.1%). However, in this younger group, Medicaid patients had higher adjusted odds of malunion/nonunion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.39 [95% CI, 1.31-1.47]) and subsequent repair (aOR = 1.38 [95% CI, 1.25-1.53]). DISCUSSION: Although older Medicaid patients experienced lower surgical rates, this may not lead to differential clinical outcomes. However, Medicaid patients aged <65 years experienced lower surgical rates that correlated with the increased rates of malunion or nonunion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In younger patients with a closed distal radius fracture and Medicaid insurance, system and patient-directed efforts should be considered to address delayed time to surgery and a higher odds for malunion/nonunion.

Is Hand Surgery in the Procedure Room Setting Associated With Increased Surgical Site Infection? A Cohort Study of 2,717 Patients in the Veterans Affairs Population.

PURPOSE: Procedure rooms (PRs) are increasingly used for hand surgeries, but few studies have directly compared surgical site infection (SSI) rates between the PR and operating room. We tested the hypothesis that procedure setting is not associated with an increased SSI incidence in the VA population. METHODS: We identified carpal tunnel, trigger finger, and first dorsal compartment releases performed at our VA institution from 1999 to 2021 of which 717 were performed in the main operating room and 2,000 were performed in the PR. The incidence of SSI, defined as signs of wound infection within 60 days of the index procedure, which was treated with oral antibiotics, intravenous antibiotics, and/or operating room irrigation and debridement, was compared. We constructed a multivariable logistic regression analysis to assess the association between procedure setting and SSI incidence, adjusting for age, sex, procedure type, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Surgical site infection incidence was 55/2,000 (2.8%) in the PR cohort and 20/717 (2.8%) in the operating room cohort. In the PR cohort, five (0.3%) cases required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics of which two (0.1%) cases required operating room irrigation and debridement. In the operating room cohort, two (0.3%) cases required hospitalization for intravenous antibiotics of which one (0.1%) case required operating room irrigation and debridement. All other SSIs were treated with oral antibiotics alone. The procedure setting was not independently associated with SSI (adjusted odds ratio, 0.84 [95% confidence interval, 0.49, 1.48]). The only risk factor for SSI was trigger finger release (odds ratio, 2.13 [95% confidence interval, 1.32, 3.48] compared with carpal tunnel release), which was independent of setting. CONCLUSIONS: Minor hand surgeries can be performed safely in the PR without an increased rate of SSI. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic II.

The Price-Quality Mismatch: Are Negotiated Prices for Total Joint Arthroplasty Associated With Hospital Quality in a Large California Health System?

BACKGROUND: Price variations in healthcare can be caused by quality or factors other than quality such as market share, negotiating power with insurers, or hospital ownership model. Efforts to improve care value (defined as the ratio between health outcomes and price) by making healthcare prices readily accessible to patients are driven by the assumption this can help patients more easily identify high-quality, low-price clinicians and health systems, thus reducing price variations. However, if price variations are driven by factors other than quality, then strategies that involve payments for higher-quality care are unlikely to reduce price variation and improve value. It is unknown whether prices for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) are correlated with the quality of care or whether factors other than quality are responsible for price variation. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) How do prices insurers negotiate for TJA paid to a single, large health system vary across payer types? (2) Are the mean prices insurers negotiate for TJA associated with hospital quality? METHODS: We analyzed publicly available data from 22 hospitals in a single, large regional health system, four of which were excluded owing to incomplete quality information. We chose to use data from this single health system to minimize the confounding effects of between-hospital reputation or branding and geographic differences in the cost of providing care. This health system consists of large and small hospitals serving urban and rural populations, providing care for more than 3 million individuals. For each hospital, negotiated prices for TJA were classified into five payer types: commercial in-network, commercial out-of-network, Medicare Advantage (plans to which private insurers contract to provide Medicare benefits), Medicaid, and discounted cash pay. Traditional Medicare plans were not included because the prices are set statutorily, not negotiated. We obtained hospital quality measures from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quality measures included TJA-specific complication and readmission rates in addition to hospital-wide patient survey star rating (measure of patient care experience) and total performance scores (aggregate measure of clinical outcomes, safety, patient experience, process of care, and efficiency). We evaluated the association between the mean negotiated hospital prices and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services quality measures using Pearson correlation coefficients and Spearman rho across all payer types. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.0025. RESULTS: The mean ± SD overall negotiated price for TJA was USD 54,500 ± 23,200. In the descriptive analysis, the lowest negotiated prices were associated with Medicare Advantage (USD 20,400 ± 1800) and Medicaid (USD 20,300 ± 8600) insurance plans, and the highest prices were associated with out-of-network care covered by commercial insurance plans (USD 78,800 ± 9200). There was no correlation between the mean negotiated price and TJA complication rate (discounted cash price: r = 0.27, p = 0.29; commercial out-of-network: r = 0.28, p = 0.26; commercial in-network: r = -0.07, p = 0.79; Medicare Advantage: r = 0.11, p = 0.65; Medicaid: r = 0.03, p = 0.92), readmission rate (discounted cash price: r = 0.19, p = 0.46; commercial out-of-network: r = 0.24, p = 0.33; commercial in-network: r = -0.13, p = 0.61; Medicare Advantage: r = -0.06, p = 0.81; Medicaid: r = 0.09, p = 0.74), patient survey star rating (discounted cash price: r = -0.55, p = 0.02; commercial out-of-network: r = -0.53, p = 0.02; commercial in-network: r = -0.37, p = 0.13; Medicare Advantage: r = -0.08, p = 0.75; Medicaid: r = -0.02, p = 0.95), or total hospital performance score (discounted cash price: r = -0.35, p = 0.15; commercial out-of-network: r = -0.55, p = 0.02; commercial in-network: r = -0.53, p = 0.02; Medicare Advantage: r = -0.28, p = 0.25; Medicaid: r = 0.11, p = 0.69) for any of the payer types evaluated. CONCLUSION: There is substantial price variation for TJA that is not accounted for by the quality of care, suggesting that a mismatch between price and quality exists. Efforts to improve care value in TJA are needed to directly link prices with the quality of care delivered, such as through matched quality and price reporting mechanisms. Future studies might investigate whether making price and quality data accessible to patients, such as through value dashboards that report easy-to-interpret quality data alongside price information, moves patients toward higher-value care decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Efforts to better match the quality of care with negotiated prices such as matched quality and price reporting mechanisms, which have been shown to increase the likelihood of choosing higher-value care in TJA, could improve the value of care.

What Program Characteristics Are Associated with Resident Racial Diversity in Orthopaedic Surgery? An Analysis of Association of American Medical Colleges Data.

In orthopaedic surgery, there are fewer Black or African American (4%) and Hispanic or Latino (4%) residents compared with general surgery, internal medicine, family medicine, and pediatrics (5%-7% Black residents and 7%-9% Hispanic/Latino residents, respectively). There are also fewer underrepresented in medicine minority (URiM) faculty in orthopaedic surgery (6.1%) compared with general surgery (8.9%), otolaryngology (7.8%), internal medicine (9.7%), and obstetrics and gynecology (15.6%). Identifying program characteristics that are associated with the percentage of URiM residents could reveal strategies for improving diversity. Methods: Using Association of American Medical Colleges orthopaedic resident and faculty race/ethnicity data from 2007 to 2016, we analyzed the racial diversity of 166 of 207 residency programs. The primary outcome was program racial diversity, measured as the percentage of URiM residents per program. The top quartile of programs was compared with the other quartiles. Characteristics analyzed included percentage of URiM faculty, affiliation with a university/top 40 medical school/top 40 orthopaedic hospital, geographic region, city type, and city size. We used a multivariable linear regression model to evaluate program characteristics associated with diversity and a linear mixed-effects model with program-specific random effects to evaluate time trends. Results: The mean percentage of URiM residents per program was 9.3% (SD = 10.5%). In the top quartile of programs, URiM residents composed 20.7% ± 2.5% of the program compared with 5.8% ± 0.3% in other quartiles (p < 0.001). After adjusting for program and faculty size, the only factor associated with the number of URiM residents per program was the number of URiM faculty. For every 5 additional URiM faculty members, there was an associated increase in the number of URiM residents per program by 3.6 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-5.0). There was a small but statistically significant annual increase in the percentage of URiM residents per program of 0.207 (95% CI: 0.112-0.302) percentage points during the study period. Conclusion: URiM representation remains low among orthopaedic residents. Efforts to increase the URiM faculty base represent a potential strategy for programs to increase URiM representation among residents by attracting more diverse applicants.

Has the Use of Electrodiagnostic Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Changed After the 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guideline?

PURPOSE: A 2016 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) clinical practice guideline (CPG) de-emphasized the need for electrodiagnostic studies (EDS) for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). We tested the hypothesis that use of EDS decreased after the AAOS CPG. METHODS: Using a national administrative claims database, we measured the proportion of patients with a diagnosis of CTS who underwent EDS within 1 year after diagnosis between 2011 and 2019. Using an interrupted time series design, we defined 2 time periods (pre-CPG and post-CPG) and compared EDS usage between the periods using segmented regression analysis. We conducted a subgroup analysis of preoperative EDS usage in patients who underwent carpal tunnel release. RESULTS: Of 2,081,829 patients with CTS, 315,449 (15.2%) underwent EDS within 1 year after diagnosis. The segmented regression analysis showed a decrease in the level of EDS usage after publication of the AAOS CPG (-11.50 per 1,000 patients [95% CI, -1.47 to -0.95 per 1,000 patients]); however, the rate of EDS usage increased in the post-CPG period (+1.75 per 1,000 patients per quarter [95% CI, 0.97-2.54 per 1,000 patients per quarter]). Of 473,753 eligible patients who underwent carpal tunnel release, 139,186 (29.4%) underwent EDS within 6 months before surgery. After publication of the AAOS CPG, preoperative EDS usage decreased by -23.57 per 1,000 patients (95% CI, -37.72 to -9.42 per 1,000 patients). However, these decreasing trends in EDS usage predated the 2016 AAOS CPG. CONCLUSIONS: The overall and preoperative EDS usage for CTS has been decreasing since at least 2014, predating the 2016 AAOS CPG, reflecting the rapid implementation of evidence into practice. However, EDS usage has increased in the post-CPG period, and a considerable proportion of patients who underwent carpal tunnel release still received EDS. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Given its high costs and disputed value, routine EDS usage should be considered for further deimplementation initiatives.

Medicaid insurance is associated with treatment disparities for proximal humerus fractures in a national database analysis.

BACKGROUND: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are the third most common type of fragility fracture in the elderly and are increasing in incidence. Disparities in treatment type, time to surgery (TTS), and complications based upon insurance type have been identified for other orthopedic conditions. Given the incidence and burden of PHFs, we sought to evaluate if insurance type was associated with treatment received, TTS, and complications in the treatment of PHFs. METHODS: We used PearlDiver, a national administrative claims database that consists of 122 million patient records. Patients diagnosed with an isolated PHF between 2010 and 2019 were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision diagnostic codes and stratified by insurance type (Medicaid, private, or Medicare). Outcomes evaluated were rate of surgery within 3 months of diagnosis with open reduction and internal fixation, hemiarthroplasty, or reverse shoulder arthroplasty; average TTS; 90-day readmissions and medical postoperative complications (deep vein thrombosis, urinary tract infection, pneumonia, sepsis, acute respiratory failure, cerebrovascular event, and acute renal failure); and 1-year surgical postoperative complications (stiffness, noninfectious wound complications, dislocation, and infection). Multivariable logistic regressions adjusting for age, sex, and Elixhauser comorbidity index were utilized to determine the association between insurance type and surgery rate/complications. RESULTS: We included 245,396 patients for analysis. Fourteen percent of Medicaid patients (1789/12,498) underwent surgery compared to 17% (25,347/149,830) of privately insured patients and 16% (13,305/83,068) of Medicare patients (pairwise, P < .001). TTS (Medicaid: 11.7 days, private: 10.6 days [P < .001]; Medicare: 10.7 days [P = .003]) varied by insurance type. Private or Medicare-insured patients were less likely to be readmitted (adjusted odds ratio: 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63-0.93] for private vs. Medicaid and 0.71 [95% CI: 0.59-0.88] for Medicare vs. Medicaid) and experienced fewer 90-day postoperative complications (adjusted odds ratio: 0.73 [95% CI: 0.62-0.85] for private vs. Medicaid, 0.65 [95% CI: 0.55-0.77] for Medicare vs. Medicaid), such as acute renal failure. TTS was also associated with differing rates of readmissions and complications. CONCLUSION: There are differences in rates of surgery, TTS, and complications after PHFs based on insurance type, representing opportunities for quality improvement initiatives. Potential methods to address these disparities include implementing standardized PHF protocols and/or reimbursement models and quality metrics that reward equitable treatment. Further research and policy adaptations should be incorporated to decrease barriers that patients face and minimize health care inequities seen in the treatment of PHFs based on insurance type.

Costs and benefits of routine hemoglobin A1c screening prior to total joint arthroplasty: a cost-benefit analysis.

Background: Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (DM) increases the risk for periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). While institutional protocols include hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) screening in TJA patients, the costs and benefits of routine preoperative screening have not been described. Methods: The authors created a decision tree model to evaluate short-term costs and risk reduction for PJIs with routine screening of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. Probabilities and costs were obtained from published sources. They calculated net costs and absolute risk reduction in PJI for routine screening versus no screening. The authors also performed sensitivity analyses of model inputs including probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSAs) consisting of 10,000 Monte Carlo simulations. Results: In patients with DM, routine screening before THA resulted in net cost savings of $81 per patient with 286 patients needing to be screened to prevent 1 PJI, while screening before TKA incurred net additional costs of $25,810 per PJI prevented. Routine screening in patients with DM undergoing THA or TKA was cost-saving across 75.5% or 21.8% of PSA simulations, respectively. In patients with no history of DM, routine screening before THA or TKA incurred net additional costs of $24,583 or $87,873 per PJI prevented, respectively. Conclusions: Routine HbA1c screening in patients with DM prior to THA with referral of patients with elevated HbA1c for glycemic optimization may prevent PJI and reduce healthcare costs. In contrast, routine screening in patients with DM prior to TKA or in patients with no history of DM is not cost-saving. Level of Evidence: Economic Level IV.

Site of service of irrigation and debridement of open finger and hand fractures: a retrospective review of trends and outcomes.

Background: Irrigation and debridement (I&D) of open finger and hand fractures can be performed in the emergency department as opposed to the operating room (OR), though reports of postoperative infection rates vary greatly. The authors hypothesized that I&D of open finger and hand fractures in the OR would decrease over time. They also describe rates of postoperative infection, reoperation, readmission, and costs. Methods: A large nationwide administrative claims dataset was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent I&D after open finger and hand fractures from 2007 to 2016. The incidence of I&D procedures performed outside the OR was reported and trends over the study period were assessed. Results: The proportion of open finger and hand fractures that underwent I&D outside the OR did not change significantly over time. Rates of postoperative surgical site infection, readmission, and reoperation were higher in the OR cohort at 90 days after the index stay. The OR cohort had greater total costs and out-of-pocket costs for the index stay. At 90 days, the OR cohort had greater total cost, but out-of-pocket costs were similar. Conclusions: Site of service for treatment of open finger and hand fractures has not significantly changed from 2007 to 2016. Given that total costs are significantly greater among patients undergoing I&D in the OR, prospective trials are needed to assess the safety of treating open finger and hand fractures outside of the OR to optimize management of these injuries. Level of Evidence: III.

Out-of-Pocket and Total Costs for Common Hand Procedures From 2008 to 2016: A Nationwide Claims Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: Rising patient out-of-pocket (OOP) costs and financial distress have been associated with reduced access to and delays in care. We evaluated whether OOP and total costs for common hand procedures have increased from 2008 to 2016 and identified key drivers of these costs. METHODS: Using the IBM MarketScan Research Databases, we identified patients who underwent trigger finger release, open carpal tunnel release, thumb carpometacarpal joint arthroplasty, cubital tunnel release, or open treatment of distal radius fracture in the outpatient setting between 2008 and 2016. Patient OOP costs included copayment, coinsurance, and deductible payments. Costs not directly related to medical care, such as transportation and childcare costs, were not included. The overall cost was defined as the sum of the patient OOP cost and insurer reimbursements. We calculated changes in OOP and total overall costs over the study period. We also performed multivariable linear regressions to evaluate the associations between costs and procedure type, insurance type, region, and site of service. RESULTS: The mean patient OOP cost increased by 55% to 71% and the total overall cost increased by 20% to 45%, depending on the procedure, between 2008 and 2016. Facility overall costs increased by 38%, whereas professional overall costs increased by 9%. Procedures performed in an office-based setting were associated with the lowest patient OOP and total overall costs, whereas high-deductible health plans were associated with the highest OOP costs. CONCLUSIONS: Patient OOP and total overall costs increased for the most common hand procedures between 2008 and 2016, driven by a substantial increase in facility costs. Office-based procedures were associated with the lowest costs. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: To alleviate the rising patient cost burden, hand surgeons could incorporate OOP cost considerations into shared decision-making tools, identify patients who may benefit from financial counseling, and shift procedures to an office-based setting.