The accuracy of cystoscopy in predicting muscle invasion in newly diagnosed bladder cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The prognosis of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has not improved for three decades. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is the standard procedure for local tumor staging. TURBT has several limitations, including the spread of tumor cells. Therefore, an alternative is needed in patients with suspected MIBC. Recent studies have shown that mpMRI is very accurate in staging bladder tumors. Because the diagnostic efficacy of urethrocystoscopy (UCS) has been reported as good as the efficacy of mpMRI to predict muscle invasion we performed this prospective multicenter study in which we compare UCS with pathology. METHODS: From July 2020 until March 2022, 321 patients with suspected primary BC in seven participating Dutch hospitals were included in this study. A flexible UCS was performed by urologists, physician assistants, or residents. Predictions of muscle invasion using a 5-point Likert scale alongside the histopathology data were recorded. The sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and 95% confidence intervals were determined using a standard contingency table. RESULTS: Of the 321 included patients, 232 (72.3%) received a histopathological diagnosis of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) and 71 (22.1%) were histopathologically diagnosed as MIBC. In 2 patients (0.6%), classification was not possible (Tx). Cystoscopy predicted muscle invasion with a sensitivity of 71.8% (95% CI 59.9-81.9), and a specificity of 89.9% (95% CI 85.4-93.3). This corresponds to a positive predictive value (PPV) of 67.1% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91.7%. CONCLUSION: Our study shows a moderate accuracy of cystoscopy to predict muscle invasion. This result does not support the use of cystoscopy only instead of TURBT for local staging.

Cost Effectiveness of Rectal Culture-based Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: The Results from a Randomized, Nonblinded, Multicenter Trial.

Background: Culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis is a plausible strategy to reduce infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) related to fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of rectal culture-based prophylaxis compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Design setting and participants: The study was performed alongside a trial in 11 Dutch hospitals investigating the effectiveness of culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal PB between April 2018 and July 2021 (trial registration number: NCT03228108). Intervention: Patients were 1:1 randomized for empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral) or culture-based prophylaxis. Costs for both prophylactic strategies were determined for two scenarios: (1) all infectious complications within 7 d after biopsy and (2) culture-proven Gram-negative infections within 30 d after biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Differences in costs and effects (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were analyzed from a healthcare and societal perspective (including productivity losses, and travel and parking costs) using a bootstrap procedure presenting uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve. Results and limitations: For the 7-d follow-up period, culture-based prophylaxis (n = 636) was €51.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.52-96.63) more expensive from a healthcare perspective and €16.95 (95% CI -54.29 to 88.18) from a societal perspective than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (n = 652). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.4%. Extrapolating our data, from a healthcare perspective, 40% ciprofloxacin resistance would lead to equal cost for both strategies. Results were similar for the 30-d follow-up period. No significant differences in QALYs were observed. Conclusions: Our results should be interpreted in the context of local ciprofloxacin resistance rates. In our setting, from a healthcare perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was significantly more expensive than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. From a societal perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was somewhat more cost effective against the threshold value customary for the Netherlands (€80.000). Patient summary: Culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy was not associated with reduced costs compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

Rectal Culture-Based Versus Empirical Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Infectious Complications in Men Undergoing Transrectal Prostate Biopsy: A Randomized, Nonblinded Multicenter Trial.

BACKGROUND: An increase in infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB), related to an increasing number of patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora, necessitates the exploration of alternatives for the traditionally used empirical prophylaxis of ciprofloxacin. We compared infectious complication rates after transrectal PB using empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis versus culture-based prophylaxis. METHODS: In this nonblinded, randomized trial, between 4 April 2018 and 30 July 2021, we enrolled 1538 patients from 11 Dutch hospitals undergoing transrectal PB. After rectal swab collection, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive empirical prophylaxis with oral ciprofloxacin (control group [CG]) or culture-based prophylaxis (intervention group [IG]). Primary outcome was any infectious complication within 7 days after biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, and bacteremia and bacteriuria within 7 and 30 days postbiopsy. For primary outcome analysis, the χ2 test stratified for hospitals was used. Trial registration number: NCT03228108. RESULTS: Data from 1288 patients (83.7%) were available for analysis (CG, 652; IG, 636). Infection rates within 7 days postbiopsy were 4.3% (n = 28) (CG) and 2.5% (n = 16) (IG) (P value = .08; reduction: -1.8%; 95% confidence interval, -.004 to .040). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.2% (n = 1288). In the CG, the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora resulted in a 6.2-fold higher risk of early postbiopsy infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the use of culture-based prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications after transrectal PB. Despite adequate prophylaxis, postbiopsy infections can still occur. Therefore, culture-based prophylaxis must be weighed against other strategies that could reduce postbiopsy infections. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03228108.

Co-treatment with melanotan-II, a potent melanocortin, does not protect against cisplatin ototoxicity.

Cisplatin, an important chemotherapeutic agent, has severe dose-limiting side effects including peripheral neurotoxicity and ototoxicity. Peripheral neurotoxicity can be delayed or prevented by simultaneous treatment with a class of neuropeptides known as melanocortins. Examples are ORG 2766, alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (alpha-MSH) and melanotan-II (MT-II). In albino guinea pigs, our group has found that ORG 2766 and alpha-MSH can also reduce cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. In this study we investigated the possibly protective effects of MT-II upon cisplatin ototoxicity. Guinea pigs, equipped with a permanent round-window electrode for electrocochleography, were treated with cisplatin (1.5 mg/kg/day intraperitoneal) and simultaneously with MT-II (30 or 3 microg/kg/day subcutaneous) or saline until a 40 dB suppression of the compound action potential (CAP) threshold (3 microV criterion) at 8 kHz occurred. This -40 dB criterion was reached after 5-18 days. Thereafter, the treatment was stopped, but electrocochleography was continued for another 4 weeks. The number of days in which the -40 dB criterion was reached in the MT-II co-treated group did not differ from the period in the saline group. Ten days after the end of the treatment a spontaneous recovery of the CAP was observed in all groups and at all frequencies, although it was more pronounced at lower frequencies. Also with respect to recovery, no differences were found between the saline and the MT-II co-treated group. Thus, in contrast with the otoprotective properties of other melanocortins, MT-II has no protective properties against cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, at least not with the doses applied here.