ABSTRACT
Background: Streptococcus pneumoniae is the main aetiological agent in bacterial pneumonia. Therefore pneumococcal PCR is often included in respiratory multiplex PCR panels, both commercial and in-house. But respiratory PCR results for S. pneumoniae are difficult to interpret due to frequent non-pathogenic colonization on the mucosal surface of the upper airways with pneumococci or to cross-reaction of the PCR target in non-pneumococcal streptococci. In this study we investigated the value of lytA gene pneumococcal PCR in patients presenting with pneumonia. Objectives: To assess the utility of lytA gene detection for S. pneumoniae in a respiratory multiplex quantitative PCR (qPCR) panel for patients presenting with pneumonia. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted for lytA gene results as target for S. pneumoniae in hospitalized patients who were diagnosed with pneumonia and for which a respiratory multiplex PCR panel was performed. Patients were classified as 'probable', 'possible' or 'unlikely' of having a pneumococcal pneumonia. Results: A sensitivity of 71.4% and specificity of 89.6% were found, corresponding to a negative predictive value and positive predictive value of 97.6% and 34.2%, respectively, when considering 'probable' versus 'possible/unlikely'. In the PCR-positive cases we found a statistically significant difference in semi-quantitative Ct values between the 'probable' and the 'possible/unlikely' groups. Conclusions: We conclude that a negative qPCR for the lytA gene in a respiratory sample is highly predictive of a negative S. pneumoniae culture and is possibly sufficient to exclude S. pneumoniae as a causative agent. Respiratory pneumococcal PCR has a high negative predictive value for pneumococcal disease but the positive predictive value is low.
ABSTRACT
Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) is a relevant finding which prompts a thorough diagnostic work-up. Follow-up blood cultures (BC) are essential in this work-up. We investigate the probability of detecting an ongoing bacteremia after initiation of active therapy according to the number of BC taken at key time points. A retrospective analysis of all patients with SAB in a 6-year period was performed. Total number of BCs taken and the positivity was registered for each day after start of therapy. A positivity-rate was corrected using a logistic mixed effects model. Observed detection frequencies were applied to calculate detection probabilities using binomial distributions. Three hundred and seventeen cases were withheld for analysis. A BC bottle positivity rate of 66.7% was found 1 day after initiation of active therapy, which decreased to 48.5% on day 4. When using 1 set of FU-BC, 73.4% of persisting SABs are detected. To maintain a probability of detection of ≥ 90%, 2 BC sets should be taken on day 2 and day 4 after start of therapy. In 10 of 109 patients with positive FU-BC, skip phenomena were registered, with a significant higher proportion in patients with < 4 BC bottles taken (14%) than when ≥ 4 BC bottles were taken (4.1%). We recommend taking 2 BC sets on days 2 and 4 after start of therapy in order to detect ≥ 90% of persisting SABs, limiting skip phenomena and blood volume required. We strongly advice against taking a single BC set as follow-up for SAB.
Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Staphylococcal Infections , Bacteremia/microbiology , Blood Culture , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Probability , Retrospective Studies , Staphylococcal Infections/diagnosis , Staphylococcal Infections/drug therapy , Staphylococcal Infections/microbiology , Staphylococcus aureusABSTRACT
Household transmission studies are useful to quantify SARS-CoV-2 transmission dynamics. We conducted a remote prospective household study to quantify transmission, and the effects of subject characteristics, household characteristics, and implemented infection control measures on transmission. Households with a laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 index case were enrolled < 48 h following test result. Follow-up included digitally daily symptom recording, regular nose-throat self-sampling and paired dried blood spots from all household members. Samples were tested for virus detection and SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Secondary attack rates (SARs) and associated factors were estimated using logistic regression. In 276 households with 920 participants (276 index cases and 644 household members) daily symptom diaries and questionnaires were completed by 95%, and > 85% completed sample collection. 200 secondary SARS-CoV-2 infections were detected, yielding a household SAR of 45.7% (95% CI 39.7-51.7%) and per-person SAR of 32.6% (95%CI: 28.1-37.4%). 126 (63%) secondary cases were detected at enrollment. Mild (aRR = 0.57) and asymptomatic index cases (aRR = 0.29) were less likely to transmit SARS-CoV-2, compared to index cases with an acute respiratory illness (p = 0.03 for trend), and child index cases (< 12 years aRR = 0.60 and 12-18 years aRR = 0.85) compared to adults (p = 0.03 for trend). Infection control interventions in households had no significant effect on transmission. We found high SARs with the majority of transmissions occuring early after SARS-CoV-2 introduction into the household. This may explain the futile effect of implemented household measures. Age and symptom status of the index case influence secondary transmission. Remote, digitally-supported study designs with self-sampling are feasible for studying transmission under pandemic restrictions.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Family Characteristics , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
We identified a novel van gene cluster in a clinical Enterococcus faecium isolate with vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 µg/mL. The ligase gene, vanP, was part of a van operon cluster of 4,589 bp on a putative novel integrative conjugative element located in a ca 98 kb genomic region presumed to be acquired by horizontal gene transfer from Clostridiumscidens and Roseburia sp. 499. Screening for van genes in E. faecium strains with borderline susceptibility to vancomycin is important.