Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Methods Mol Biol ; 463: 309-20, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18951175

ABSTRACT

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are among the most dangerous types of DNA damage. Unrepaired, DSBs may lead to cell death, and when misrejoined, they can result in potentially carcinogenic chromosome rearrangements. The induction of DSBs and their repair take place in a chromatin microenvironment. Therefore, understanding and describing the dynamics of DSB-containing chromatin is of crucial importance for understanding interactions among DSBs and their repair. Recent developments have made it possible to study ionizing radiation-induced foci of DSB repair proteins in vivo. In this chapter, we describe techniques that can be applied to visualize and analyze the spatio-temporal dynamics of DSB-containing chromatin domains in mammalian cell nuclei. Analogous procedures may also be applied to the analysis of mobility of other intranuclear structures in living cells.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded , Genetic Techniques , Microscopy, Phase-Contrast/methods , Animals , Cell Line, Tumor , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Chromatin/metabolism , Chromosomes/ultrastructure , DNA Damage , DNA Repair , Green Fluorescent Proteins/metabolism , Humans , Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/metabolism , Mammals , Time Factors , Tumor Suppressor p53-Binding Protein 1
2.
Nat Methods ; 5(3): 261-6, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18309310

ABSTRACT

Understanding how cells maintain genome integrity when challenged with DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is of major importance, particularly since the discovery of multiple links of DSBs with genome instability and cancer-predisposition disorders. Ionizing radiation is the agent of choice to produce DSBs in cells; however, targeting DSBs and monitoring changes in their position over time can be difficult. Here we describe a procedure for induction of easily recognizable linear arrays of DSBs in nuclei of adherent eukaryotic cells by exposing the cells to alpha particles from a small Americium source (Box 1). Each alpha particle traversing the cell nucleus induces a linear array of DSBs, typically 10-20 DSBs per 10 mum track length. Because alpha particles cannot penetrate cell-culture plastic or coverslips, it is necessary to irradiate cells through a Mylar membrane. We describe setup and irradiation procedures for two types of experiments: immunodetection of DSB response proteins in fixed cells grown in Mylar-bottom culture dishes (Option A) and detection of fluorescently labeled DSB-response proteins in living cells irradiated through a Mylar membrane placed on top of the cells (Option B). Using immunodetection, recruitment of repair proteins to individual DSB sites as early as 30 s after irradiation can be detected. Furthermore, combined with fluorescence live-cell microscopy of fluorescently tagged DSB-response proteins, this technique allows spatiotemporal analysis of the DSB repair response in living cells. Although the procedures might seem a bit intimidating, in our experience, once the source and the setup are ready, it is easy to obtain results. Because the live-cell procedure requires more hands-on experience, we recommend starting with the fixed-cell application.


Subject(s)
Alpha Particles , DNA Damage , DNA/radiation effects , Americium , Cell Line, Tumor , Humans
3.
Science ; 303(5654): 92-5, 2004 Jan 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14704429

ABSTRACT

Interactions between ends from different DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can produce tumorigenic chromosome translocations. Two theories for the juxta-position of DSBs in translocations, the static "contact-first" and the dynamic "breakage-first" theory, differ fundamentally in their requirement for DSB mobility. To determine whether or not DSB-containing chromosome domains are mobile and can interact, we introduced linear tracks of DSBs in nuclei. We observed changes in track morphology within minutes after DSB induction, indicating movement of the domains. In a subpopulation of cells, the domains clustered. Juxtaposition of different DSB-containing chromosome domains through clustering, which was most extensive in G1 phase cells, suggests an adhesion process in which we implicate the Mre11 complex. Our results support the breakage-first theory to explain the origin of chromosomal translocations.


Subject(s)
Chromosome Breakage , Chromosomes, Human/metabolism , DNA Damage , DNA/metabolism , Histones/metabolism , Alpha Particles , Animals , Ataxia Telangiectasia/genetics , Ataxia Telangiectasia/metabolism , CHO Cells , Cell Nucleus/metabolism , Cell Nucleus/radiation effects , Chromosomes, Mammalian/metabolism , Cricetinae , Cricetulus , DNA/radiation effects , DNA Repair , DNA-Binding Proteins/metabolism , Fibroblasts/metabolism , G1 Phase , G2 Phase , HeLa Cells , Humans , MRE11 Homologue Protein , Phosphorylation , Rad51 Recombinase , S Phase , Translocation, Genetic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL