ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: In patients with chest pain who arrive at the emergency department (ED) by ambulance, venous access is frequently established prehospital, and could be utilized to sample blood. Prehospital blood sampling may save time in the diagnostic process. In this study, the association of prehospital blood draw with blood sample arrival times, troponin turnaround times, and ED length of stay (LOS), number of blood sample mix-ups and blood sample quality were assessed. METHODS: The study was conducted from October 1, 2019 to February 29, 2020. In patients who were transported to the ED with acute chest pain with low suspicion for acute coronary syndrome (ACS), outcomes were compared between cases, in whom prehospital blood draw was performed, and controls, in whom blood was drawn at the ED. Regression analyses were used to assess the association of prehospital blood draw with the time intervals. RESULTS: Prehospital blood draw was performed in 100 patients. In 406 patients, blood draw was performed at the ED. Prehospital blood draw was independently associated with shorter blood sample arrival times, shorter troponin turnaround times and decreased LOS (P<0.001). No differences in the number of blood sample mix-ups and quality were observed (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: For patients with acute chest pain with low suspicion for ACS, prehospital blood sampling is associated with shorter time intervals, while there were no significant differences between the two groups in the validity of the blood samples.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As unplanned Emergency Department (ED) return visits (URVs) are associated with adverse health outcomes in older adults, many EDs have initiated post-discharge interventions to reduce URVs. Unfortunately, most interventions fail to reduce URVs, including telephone follow-up after ED discharge, investigated in a recent trial. To understand why these interventions were not effective, we analyzed patient and ED visit characteristics and reasons for URVs within 30 days for patients aged ≥ 70 years. METHODS: Data was used from a randomized controlled trial, investigating whether telephone follow-up after ED discharge reduced URVs compared to a satisfaction survey call. Only observational data from control group patients were used. Patient and index ED visit characteristics were compared between patients with and without URVs. Two independent researchers determined the reasons for URVs and categorized them into: patient-related, illness-related, new complaints and other reasons. Associations were examined between the number of URVs per patient and the categories of reasons for URVs. RESULTS: Of the 1659 patients, 222 (13.4%) had at least one URV within 30 days. Male sex, ED visit in the 30 days before the index ED visit, triage category "urgent", longer length of ED stay, urinary tract problems, and dyspnea were associated with URVs. Of the 222 patients with an URV, 31 (14%) returned for patient-related reasons, 95 (43%) for illness-related reasons, 76 (34%) for a new complaint and 20 (9%) for other reasons. URVs of patients who returned ≥ 3 times were mostly illness-related (72%). CONCLUSION: As the majority of patients had an URV for illness-related reasons or new complaints, these data fuel the discussion as to whether URVs can or should be prevented. TRIAL REGISTRATION: For this cohort study, we used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT). This trial was pre-registered in the Netherlands Trial Register with number NTR6815 on the 7th of November 2017.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Patient Readmission , Male , Humans , Aged , Cohort Studies , Patient Discharge , TriageABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: During a 6-year period, several process changes were introduced at the emergency department (ED) to decrease crowding, such as the implementation of a general practitioner cooperative (GPC) and additional medical staff during peak hours. In this study, we assessed the effects of these process changes on three crowding measures: patients' length of stay (LOS), the modified National ED OverCrowding Score (mNEDOCS), and exit block while taking into account changing external circumstances, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and centralization of acute care. METHODS: We determined time points of the various interventions and external circumstances and built an interrupted time-series (ITS) model per outcome measure. We analyzed changes in level and trend before and after the selected time points using ARIMA modeling, to account for autocorrelation in the outcome measures. RESULTS: Longer patients' ED LOS was associated with more inpatient admissions and more urgent patients. The mNEDOCS decreased with the integration of the GPC and the expansion of the ED to 34 beds and increased with the closure of a neighboring ED and ICU. More exit blocks occurred when more patients with shortness of breath and more patients > 70 years of age presented to the ED. During the severe influenza wave of 2018-2019, patients' ED LOS and the number of exit blocks increased. CONCLUSIONS: In the ongoing battle against ED crowding, it is pivotal to understand the effect of interventions, corrected for changing circumstances and patient and visit characteristics. In our ED, interventions which were associated with decreased crowding measures included the expansion of the ED with more beds and the integration of the GPC on the ED.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Preparations for Covid-19 in the Netherlands included hospital reconfigurations to increase capacity for the expected surge at the emergency department (ED). We describe patients' ED length of stay (LOS), crowding and experiences of patients with respiratory complaints during the first Covid-19 peak. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of demand, ED LOS, crowding, and a patient experience survey during a 12-week period in 2020 and similar periods in 2018 and 2019. Crowding levels were calculated using the National ED OverCrowding Scale. RESULTS: The number of patients with respiratory complaints increased significantly, while total ED numbers were unchanged. Although presentation during the Covid-19 peak and needing hospital admission were associated with a longer ED LOS in patients with respiratory complaints, significantly less crowding occurred compared with the 2018 and 2019 periods. Increased ED LOS was associated with lower patient experience scores. CONCLUSION: Advanced warning and its associated preparation within the hospital and the community prevented significant delays in ED throughput during the first Covid-19 peak.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Hospitalization , Length of Stay , Emergency Service, Hospital , CrowdingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Telephone follow-up calls could optimize the transition from the emergency department (ED) to home for older patients. However, the effects on hospital return rates are not clear. We investigated whether telephone follow-up reduces unplanned hospitalizations and/or unplanned ED return visits within 30 days of ED discharge. DESIGN: Pragmatic randomized controlled trial with allocation by month; odd months intervention group, even months control group. SETTING: Two ED locations of a non-academic teaching hospital in The Netherlands. PARTICIPANTS: Community-dwelling adults aged ≥70 years, discharged home from the ED were randomized to the intervention group (N = 4732) or control group (N = 5104). INTERVENTION: Intervention group patients: semi-scripted telephone call from an ED nurse within 24 h after discharge to identify post-discharge problems and review discharge instructions. Control group patients: scripted satisfaction survey telephone call. MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome: total number of unplanned hospitalizations and/or ED return visits within 30 days of ED discharge. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: separate numbers of unplanned hospitalizations and ED return visits. Subgroup analysis by age, sex, living condition, and degree of crowding in the ED at discharge. RESULTS: Overall, 42% were males, and median age was 78 years. In the intervention group, 1516 of 4732 patients (32%) consented, and in the control group 1659 of 5104 (33%) patients. Unplanned 30-day hospitalization and/or ED return visit was found in 16% of intervention group patients and 14% of control group patients (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval: 0.96-1.42). Also, no statistically significant differences were found in secondary outcome measures. Within the subgroups, the intervention did not have beneficial effects for the intervention group. CONCLUSION: Telephone follow-up after ED discharge in older patients did not result in reduction of unplanned hospital admissions and/or ED return visits within 30 days. These results raise the question of whether other outcomes could be improved by post-discharge ED telephone follow-up.
Subject(s)
Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Telephone/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals , Humans , Male , Netherlands , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
When acute stroke care is organised using a "drip-and-ship" model, patients receive immediate treatment at the nearest primary stroke centre followed by transfer to a comprehensive stroke centre (CSC). When stroke care is further centralised into the "direct-to-mothership" model, patients with stroke symptoms are immediately brought to a CSC to further reduce treatment times and enhance stroke outcomes. We investigated the effects of the ongoing centralization in a Dutch urban setting on treatment times of patients with confirmed ischemic stroke in a 4-year period. Next, in a non-randomized controlled trial, we assessed treatment times of patients with suspected ischemic stroke, and treatment times of patients with neurologic disorders other than suspected ischemic stroke, before and after the intervention in the CSC and the decentralized hospitals, the intervention being the change from "drip and ship" into "direct-to-mothership". Our findings provide support for the ongoing centralization of acute stroke care in urban areas. Treatment times for patients with ischemic stroke decreased significantly, potentially improving functional outcomes. Improvements in treatment times for patients with suspected ischemic stroke were achieved without negative side effects for self-referrals with stroke symptoms and patients with other neurological disorders.
Subject(s)
Brain Ischemia , Stroke , Humans , Patient Transfer , Referral and Consultation , Stroke/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Background: Headache is among the most prevalent complaints in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED). Clinicians are faced with the difficult task to differentiate primary (benign) from secondary headache disorders, since no international guidelines currently exist of clinical indicators for neuroimaging in headache patients. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of 501 patients who presented at the ED with headache as a primary complaint between April 2018 and December 2018. Primary outcomes included the amount of diagnostic imaging, the different conclusions provided by diagnostic imaging, and the clinical factors associated with abnormal imaging results. Results: About half of the patients were diagnosed with a primary headache disorder. Cranial CT imaging at the ED was performed regularly (61% of the patients) and led to the diagnosis of underlying pathology in 1 in 7.6 patients. In a multivariate model, factors significantly associated with abnormal cranial CT results were age 50 years or older, presentation within 1 h after headache onset, clinical history of aphasia, and focal neurological deficit at examination. Conclusions: As separate clinical characteristics have limited value in detecting severe underlying headache disorders, cranial imaging is regularly performed in the ED. Clinical prediction model tools applied to headache patients may identify patients at risk of intracranial pathology prior to diagnostic imaging and reduce cranial imaging in the future.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) frequently require procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) to facilitate procedures, such as joint reduction. Proper documentation of screening demonstrates awareness of the necessity of presedation assessment. It is unknown if introducing emergency physicians (EPs) at the ED improves presedation assessment and documentation. In this study the differences in documentation of ED sedation and success rates for reduction of hip dislocations in the presence versus absence of EPs are described. METHODS: In this retrospective descriptive study, we analyzed data of patients presenting with a dislocated hip post total hip arthroplasty (THA) shortly after the introduction of EPs. The primary outcome measure was the presence of documentation of presedation assessment. Secondary outcomes were documentation of medication, vital signs, and success rate of hip reductions. RESULTS: In the two-year study period, 133 sedations for hip reductions were performed. Sixty-eight sedations were completed by an EP. The documentation of fasting status, airway screening, analgesia use, and vital signs was documented significantly more often when an EP was present (respectively 64.9%, 80.3%, 37.4%, and 72.7%, all P < 0.001). There was no difference in success rate of hip reductions between the groups. CONCLUSION: PSA in the ED is associated with superior documentation of presedation assessment, medication, and vital signs when EPs are involved.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Older patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) are at increased risk for adverse outcomes. Transitional care programs offer close surveillance after discharge, but are costly. Telephone follow-up (TFU) may be a low-cost and feasible alternative for transitional care programs, but its effects on health-related outcomes are not clear. AIM: We systematically reviewed the literature to evaluate the effects of TFU by health care professionals after ED discharge to an unassisted living environment on health-related outcomes in older patients compared to controls. METHODS: We conducted a multiple electronic database search up until December 2019 for controlled studies examining the effects of TFU by health care professionals for patients aged ≥65 years, discharged to an unassisted living environment from a hospital ED. Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and risk of bias. RESULTS: Of the 748 citations, two randomized controlled trials (including a total of 2120 patients) met review selection criteria. In both studies, intervention group patients received a scripted telephone intervention from a trained nurse and control patients received a patient satisfaction survey telephone call or usual care. No demonstrable benefits of TFU were found on ED return visits, hospitalization, acquisition of prescribed medication, and compliance with follow-up appointments. However, many eligible patients were not included, because they were not reached or refused to participate. CONCLUSIONS: No benefits of a scripted TFU call from a nurse were found on health services utilization and discharge plan adherence by older patients after ED discharge. As the number of high-quality studies was limited, more research is needed to determine the effect and feasibility of TFU in different older populations. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019141403.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Emergency departments (EDs) worldwide face crowding, which negatively affects patient care. Diagnostic imaging plays a major role in management of ED patients and contributes to patients' length of stay at the ED. In this study, the impact of Lean-driven interventions on the imaging process at the ED was assessed. METHODS: During a 6-month multimodal intervention period, Lean-driven interventions and a dedicated radiologist present at the ED were implemented during peak hours (12 a.m.-8 p.m.). Data concerning patient population, radiology department turnaround time (RDTT), radiology report time (RRT), and examination time (ET) for ED patients were compared with a control period of 6 months 1 year earlier. RESULTS: RDTT, RRT, and ET were significantly shorter in the intervention period compared with those in the control period. Median RDTT was respectively 36 min (interquartile range (IQR) 24-56) and 70 min (IQR 39-127), RRT 11 min (IQR 6-21) and 37 min (IQR 15-88), and ET 22 min (IQR 14-35) and 23 min (14-38). CONCLUSION: Lean-driven interventions on the imaging process at the ED significantly reduced RDTT, RRT, and ET.
Subject(s)
Crowding , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Radiologists/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Total Quality Management , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Time FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Emergency department (ED) recidivism and the use of amphetamine and associated derivatives such as methamphetamine and MDMA (MAE), are intersecting public health concerns. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine the frequency of ED recidivism of patients who use MAE and associated factors. METHODS: The study was a retrospective 6-year electronic medical record review of patients with MAE-positive toxicology screens and single and multiple ED visits in the span of 12 months. RESULTS: There were 7844 ED visits by 5568 MAE-positive patients. Average age was 42 ± 13 years. The majority were male (65%), white (46%), tobacco smokers (55%), and in the psychiatric discharge diagnostic-related group (41%), followed by blunt trauma (20%). Admission rate was 35%, with another 17% transferred to inpatient psychiatric treatment facilities. Occasional (2-5 visits/year), heavy (6-11 visits/year), and super users (≥12 visits/year) altogether accounted for 20% of patients and 43% of visits. Heavy and super users combined represented 2% of patients and 10% of visits, with significant differences for race/ethnicity, health insurance, tobacco smoking, and psychiatric/cardiovascular/trauma discharge diagnostic-related groups. Heavy and super users were less likely to be admitted and more likely to be discharged to an inpatient psychiatric treatment facility. Regression analysis revealed racial/ethnic differences, female gender, and tobacco smoking to be associated with super and heavy use. Heavy users were more likely to have cardiovascular-related discharge diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of ED recidivism in patients who use MAE is similar to published ranges for general ED users. Significant differences in demographics, discharge diagnoses, insurance, smoking, and disposition exist between nonfrequent and frequent ED users.
Subject(s)
Methamphetamine , N-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine , Recidivism , Adult , Amphetamine , Emergency Service, Hospital , Female , Humans , Male , Methamphetamine/adverse effects , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: A new nationwide guideline for minor head injury was introduced in the Netherlands in 2010. The effect on computed tomography (CT) ratio and hospital admission ratio after introduction of the guideline is unknown. The aim was to reduce these numbers as part of cost-effective health care. Therefore, we assessed the effect on these variables after introduction of the guideline. METHODS: We used an interrupted time-series study design. Data selection was done 3 years before (2007-2009) and several years after (2012, 2014, 2015) introduction of the guideline. RESULTS: Data collection was performed for 3880 patients. Introduction of the new guideline was associated with an increase in CT ratio from 24.6% before to 55% after introduction (P < 0.001). This increase is the result of both the new guideline and a secular trend. Besides this, hospital admissions increased from 14.7 to 23.4% (P < 0.001) during the study period. This increase was less clearly associated with the new guideline. After introduction of the guideline there was no significant difference in (intra)cranial traumatic findings (2.6% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.13) and neurosurgical interventions (0.1% vs. 0.2%; P = 0.50). CONCLUSION: Between 2007 and 2015, a marked increase in CT ratio and hospital admissions has been observed. The increase in CT ratio seems to be caused both by the new guideline and by a secular trend to perform more CT scans. Adaptations to the guideline should be considered to improve patient care and cost-effectiveness in patients with minor head injury.
Subject(s)
Craniocerebral Trauma , Emergency Service, Hospital , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Craniocerebral Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Craniocerebral Trauma/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , NetherlandsABSTRACT
For patients with acute ischaemic stroke, faster recanalisation improves the chances of a disability-free life and a quick discharge from the hospital. Hospital discharge, certainly after suffering a major life-changing event such as a stroke, is a complex and vulnerable phase in the patient's journey. Elderly are particularly vulnerable to the stressors caused by hospitalisation. Recently hospitalised patients are not only recovering from their acute illness; they also experience a period of generalised risk for a range of adverse events. At the same time, elderly generally prefer living in their own homes and should be discharged from the hospital and return home as quickly as possible. Both premature and delayed discharge are potential threats to patient well-being. We present a 90-year-old patient who underwent successful thrombectomy but suffered from night-time confusion at the hospital and discuss the transition process from hospital to home.
Subject(s)
Confusion/etiology , Ischemic Stroke/complications , Aged, 80 and over , Circadian Rhythm , Female , Humans , Ischemic Stroke/surgery , Patient Discharge , ThrombectomyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Routine screening programmes for hazardous alcohol use in the ED miss large numbers of patients. We investigated whether patient-related or staff-related factors cause screening failures and whether unscreened patients are at increased risk of hazardous alcohol use. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of a prospective study. From November 2012 to November 2013, all adult patients visiting a Dutch inner city ED were screened for hazardous alcohol consumption using the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption. Reasons for failure of screening were categorised as: (A) patient is unable to cooperate (due to illness or pain, decreased consciousness or incomprehension due to intoxication, psychiatric, cognitive or neurological disorder or language barrier), (B) healthcare professional forgot to ask, (C) patient refuses cooperation and (D) screening was recently performed (<6 months ago). Presence of risk factors for hazardous alcohol use was compared between screened and unscreened patients. RESULTS: Of the 28 019 ED patients, 18 310 (65%) were screened and 9709 (35%) were not. In 7150 patients staff forgot to screen, whereas 2559 patients were not screened due to patient factors (2340 being unable and 219 unwilling). Patients with any of these risk factors were less likely to be screened: male sex, alcohol-related visit, any intoxication, head injury, any kind of wound and major trauma. In multivariate analysis, all these risk factors were independently associated with not being screened. Patients with at least one risk factor for hazardous alcohol use were less likely to be screened. Highest prevalence of risk factors was found in patients unable or unwilling to cooperate. CONCLUSION: Patients who do not undergo routine screening for alcohol use at triage in the ED have an increased risk for hazardous alcohol use. These data highlight the importance of screening patients, especially those initially unwilling or unable to cooperate, at a later stage.
Subject(s)
Alcoholism/diagnosis , Mass Screening/methods , Risk-Taking , Adult , Alcoholism/epidemiology , Alcoholism/psychology , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the numbers and length of stay (LOS) of patients with mental health (MH) problems at a Dutch emergency department (ED) and the effect of a psychiatric intervention team (PIT) on patient flow. METHODS: A longitudinal design was used to assess number of MH presentations and LOS during a 3-year period (2014-2016). In 2017, we introduced a PIT during ED peak hours, to reduce LOS for patients with MH problems. We evaluate the effects of the PIT on patients' LOS with an 18-month before and after intervention study (2017-2018). RESULTS: Total number of ED presentations increased with 4%. Total number of MH presentations increased with 23% from 2014 to 2016. LOS increased by 28â¯min (95â¯min vs. 123â¯min) for all presentations, while not changing for MH presentations (2014: 195â¯min, interquartile range (IQR) 120-293 and 2016: 190â¯min, IQR 116-296). In the before and after intervention study, number of MH presentations increased with 36% while LOS decreased with 46â¯min (pâ¯<â¯0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of MH presentations increased over the three years while LOS remained similar. In the before and after intervention study, number of presentations increased even more while LOS decreased significantly. Specialist psychiatric input reduces ED LOS.
Subject(s)
Mental Disorders/nursing , Adult , Aged , Chi-Square Distribution , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/psychology , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Self-Injurious Behavior/complications , Self-Injurious Behavior/nursing , Self-Injurious Behavior/psychology , Statistics, NonparametricABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Heatwaves have been linked to increased risk of mortality and morbidity and are projected to increase in frequency and intensity due to climate change. The current study uses emergency department (ED) data from Australia, Botswana, Netherlands, Pakistan, and the United States of America to evaluate the impact of heatwaves on ED attendances, admissions and mortality. METHODS: Routinely collected time series data were obtained from 18 hospitals. Two separate thresholds (≥4 and ≥7) of the acclimatisation excess heat index (EHIaccl) were used to define "hot days". Analyses included descriptive statistics, independent samples T-tests to determine differences in case mix between hot days and other days, and threshold regression to determine which temperature thresholds correspond to large increases in ED attendances. FINDINGS: In all regions, increases in temperature that did not coincide with time to acclimatise resulted in increases in ED attendances, and the EHIaccl performed in a similar manner. During hot days in California and The Netherlands, significantly more children ended up in the ED, while in Pakistan more elderly people attended. Hot days were associated with more patient admissions in the ages 5-11 in California, 65-74 in Karachi, and 75-84 in The Hague. During hot days in The Hague, patients with psychiatric symptoms were more likely to die. The current study did not identify a threshold temperature associated with particularly large increases in ED demand. INTERPRETATION: The association between heat and ED demand differs between regions. A limitation of the current study is that it does not consider delayed effects or influences of other environmental factors. Given the association between heat and ED use, hospitals and governmental authorities should recognise the demands that heat can place on local health care systems. These demands differ substantially between regions, with Pakistan being the most heavily affected within our study sample.
Subject(s)
Climate Change , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Service, Hospital , Extreme Heat/adverse effects , Heat Stress Disorders/mortality , Acclimatization , Adolescent , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia/epidemiology , Botswana/epidemiology , California/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Pakistan/epidemiology , SeasonsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe the impact of additional medical specialists, non-emergency physicians (non-EPs), performing direct supervision or a combination of direct and indirect supervision at an EP-led emergency department (ED), on patient flow and satisfaction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional, three-part study was carried out including staff surveys (n=379), a before and after 16-week data collection using data of visits during the peak hours (n=5270), and patient questionnaires during 1 week before the pilot and during week 5 of the pilot. Content analysis and descriptive statistics were used for analyses. RESULTS: The value of being present at the ED was acknowledged by medical specialists in 49% of their surveys and 35% of the EPs' and ED nurses' surveys, especially during busy shifts. Radiologists were most often (67.3%) convinced of their value of being on-site, which was agreed upon by the ED professionals. Perceived improved quality of care, shortening of length of stay, and enhanced peer consultation were mentioned most often.During the pilot period, length of stay of boarded patients decreased from 197 min (interquartile range: 121 min) to 181 min (interquartile range: 113 min, P=0.006), and patient recommendation scores increased from -15 to +20. CONCLUSION: Although limited by the mix of direct and indirect supervision, our results suggest a positive impact of additional medical specialists during busy shifts. Throughput of admitted patients and patient satisfaction improved during the pilot period. Whether these findings differ between direct supervision and combination of direct and indirect supervision by the medical specialists requires further investigation.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Medical Staff/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Workforce , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pilot Projects , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine issues in care for patients who come to the emergency department after a suicide attempt. DESIGN: Cross-sectional multicentre questionnaire survey. METHOD: In 2015, 7 emergency departments across the Netherlands participated in a questionnaire survey of the 113 Suicide Prevention (113 Zelfmoordpreventie) service as a part of the 2014-2017 National Suicide Prevention Agenda. Emergency physicians and nurses and managers answered 25 multiple-choice questions about: (a) current treatment of and contact with patients who attempted suicide, (b) available knowledge and skills of emergency physicians and nurses and (c) after-care for patients who attempted suicide. RESULTS: In total, 33 emergency physicians, 40 emergency nurses and 5 managers completed the questionnaire. When a patient comes to the emergency department after a suicide attempt, emergency physicians and nurses often consult with the crisis service, psychiatrist or a colleague and they request extra diagnostics. The most important issue indicated by emergency staff is that they do not have enough time, knowledge and skills to estimate the suicide risk and to conduct a conversation with the patient about her or his suicidal thoughts. One-fifth of the respondents indicated that they do not always treat patients who committed a previous suicide attempt with respect. The respondents also thought that the emergency department environment is too restless or unsafe and thought that they have to wait for the crisis service for a long time. The majority of the emergency physicians and nurses worried about the condition of the patient after her or his discharge, especially when they estimate a high probability of another suicide attempt. CONCLUSION: Insufficient knowledge and skills of emergency department staff, a sometimes negative attitude towards people who attempted suicide and a heavy workload are hindering care at the emergency department for people who attempted suicide. Targeted training, a quiet area and deployment of specialised care could improve this care.
Subject(s)
Aftercare , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Competence , Emergency Service, Hospital , Emergency Treatment , Referral and Consultation , Suicide, Attempted , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emergency Medicine , Emergency Nursing , Humans , Netherlands , Nurses , Patient Discharge , Physicians , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Psychiatry , Suicidal Ideation , Surveys and Questionnaires , Time FactorsABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Previous studies indicate that crowding scales may not perform well in low-volume emergency departments (EDs). In this study, face-validity of the Modified National ED OverCrowding Score (mNEDOCS) was assessed in a high-volume ED as well as in a low-volume ED. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study was performed in the Netherlands. The correlation of the mNEDOCS with ED staff perceptions of crowding were assessed, using weighted Kappa (κ) and Pearson correlation. Subsequently, ED process measures (elapsed target times to triage, elapsed target times to treatment and patients' LOS) were described under different levels of ED crowding. RESULTS: Correlation between the categorized crowding scores was low (weighted κ 0.34 resp. 0.26). However, good correlations of 0.73 and 0.82 were found between the uncategorized mNEDOCS and ED staff's perception of crowding. Percentages of patients with elapsed target times to treatment increased simultaneously with increasingly busy periods when measured with mNEDOCS. CONCLUSIONS: The uncategorized mNEDOCS correlates well with perceived crowding, even at a low-volume ED. Determining a cut-off level at which a specific ED can be identified as crowded is important, because the predefined mNEDOCS categories may not be optimal for all EDs.