18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT in the localization of tumor-induced osteomalacia: case series and literature review.

Introduction: This study explores tumor-induced osteomalacia (TIO) through a case series and literature review, assessing the diagnostic potential of 18F-AlF-NOTA-octreotide (18F-OC) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). Methods: We analyzed TIO patients who underwent 18F-OC PET/CT. Parameters such as tumor dimension, the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were meticulously assessed. Clinical features and imaging characteristics pertinent to TIO were reviewed. Results: 6 patients with clinical suspicion of TIO exhibited hypophosphatemia (0.25 to 0.64 mmol/L), elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (142 to 506 U/L), and increased parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels (92.9 to 281.7 pg/mL). Of these patients, two underwent FGF-23 testing, with results of 3185.00 pg/ml and 17.56 pg/ml, respectively. Conventional imaging modalities depicted widespread osteoporosis, with several cases demonstrating fractures indicative of osteomalacic and associated pathological fractures. Subsequent 18F-OC PET/CT facilitated the accurate localization of causative tumors, with histopathological examination confirming the diagnosis of phosphaturic mesenchymal tumor (PMT). The interval from initial clinical presentation to definitive TIO diagnosis spanned approximately 2.5 years (range: 1 - 4 years), with tumors varying in size (maximum diameter: 7.8 to 40.0 mm), SUVmax (5.47 to 25.69), SUVmean (3.43 to 7.26), and MTV (1.27 to 18.59 cm3). Conclusion: The implementation of whole-body 18F-OC PET/CT imaging emerges as a critical tool in the identification of occult tumors causing TIO. Future investigations incorporating a broader cohort are imperative to further delineate the diagnostic and therapeutic implications of 18F-OC PET/CT in managing TIO.

Clinical impact of using [18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide PET/CT instead of [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT: Secondary endpoint analysis of a multicenter, prospective trial.

[18F]AlF-NOTA-octreotide ([18F]AlF-OC) is a promising alternative for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-somatostatin analogs (SSAs) in positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of the somatostatin receptor (SSTR). Our aim is to assess changes in TNM staging and differences in patient management between [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT in the work-up of neuroendocrine tumor (NET) patients. Patients who underwent both [18F]AlF-OC and [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE or [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-NOC PET/CT in our multicenter study (Pauwels et al., J Nucl Med.2023;63:632-638) with a NET were included for analysis. TNM staging was determined and compared for both tracers. For each patient, the blinded [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA or [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT images were presented in random order at a multidisciplinary team board. The images were presented together with clinical information and compared with previous SSTR and [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging. After a consensus decision for patient management was recorded, the board was presented with the PET/CT images from the other SSTR tracer and a decision was made for the second tracer. Differences in management were classified as major if it entailed an intermodality change and minor if it led to an intramodality change. Compared with [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA, the use of [18F]AlF-OC led to a change in 16/75 patients: TNM staging changes in 10/75 patients (13.3%; downstaging in 3/10, upstaging in 7/10) and differences in clinical management were seen in 10/75 patients (13.3%), leading to a major difference in 7/10 cases and a minor change in 3/10 cases. All 10 cases with a difference in patient management between both PET tracers were caused by additional lesion detection by [18F]AlF-OC. The use of [18F]AlF-OC did not impact TNM staging or clinical management in the large majority of the patients (86.7%), further validating the potential for routine clinical use of [18F]AlF-OC PET/CT as an alternative for [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-SSA PET/CT. The trial is registered under ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04552847 and EudraCT 2020-000549-15.