Profilaxis quirúrgica en Apendicectomía en niños ≤ 15 años internados en un Hospital de Referencia desde enero a diciembre del año 2022

Introducción: Las infecciones de sitio quirúrgico (ISQ), se encuentran entre las infecciones asociadas al cuidado de la salud (IACS) más frecuentes, la profilaxis antibiótica administrada en el período preoperatorio contribuye a prevenir las ISQ. Objetivo: determinar si los esquemas antimicrobianos utilizados para profilaxis en cirugía corresponden a recomendados por Guías Internacionales de Tratamiento de Enfermedades Infecciosas; así como conocer los esquemas antimicrobianos utilizados, estimar el costo de la quimioprofilaxis y comparar con los resultados obtenidos en un estudio similar realizado en el mismo servicio en el año 2005. Materiales y métodos: Estudio descriptivo, observacional, retrospectivo donde se seleccionaron todas las historias clínicas de pacientes de ≤15 años de edad sometidos a apendicectomía, con diagnóstico posquirúrgico de apendicitis congestiva o flegmonosa, desde enero a diciembre del 2022. Se elaboró una planilla electrónica donde se cargaron los siguientes datos: antibiótico utilizado, dosis, número de dosis y momento de la administración. Resultados: 53 pacientes ≤ de 15 años fueron sometidos a apendicectomía, de los cuales 21 llenaban los criterios de inclusión. Fue utilizado Amoxicilina/Sulbactam en 19/21. El número total de dosis administradas fue de 68 dosis y la media de 3,3±1,9 dosis; solo en 8 de los pacientes se administró el antimicrobiano profiláctico en el tiempo correcto; solo 1 paciente recibió el esquema correcto, 1 sola dosis, 1 hora antes del inicio de la cirugía. El costo de la profilaxis antimicrobiana por paciente fue de 15,7 USD. Conclusión: Este trabajo nos permitió verificar la falta de aplicación de guías en el uso de antimicrobianos en la profilaxis quirúrgica, lo cual demuestra: i) la necesidad de revisar y estandarizar la conducta de prescripción relacionada en profilaxis quirúrgica, ii) la importancia de elaborar y socializar una guía de manejo de antimicrobianos y iii) el monitoreo de su implementación.

Introduction: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most frequent healthcare-associated infections (HCIs). Antibiotic prophylaxis administered during the preoperative period contributes to preventing SSIs. Objective: to determine if the antimicrobial regimens used for prophylaxis in surgery correspond to those recommended by International Guidelines for the Treatment of Infectious Diseases; as well as knowing the antimicrobial regimens used, estimating the cost of chemoprophylaxis and comparing the current results with those obtained in a similar study carried out in the same service in 2005. Materials and methods: This was a descriptive, observational and retrospective study where we reviewed all medical records of patients ≤15 years of age undergoing appendectomy, with a post-surgical diagnosis of congestive or phlegmonous appendicitis, from January to December 2022. An electronic spreadsheet was prepared where the following data were uploaded: antibiotic used, dose, number of doses and time of administration. Results: 53 patients ≤ 15 years of age underwent appendectomy, of which 21 met the inclusion criteria. Amoxicillin/Sulbactam was used in 19/21. The total number of doses administered was 68 doses and the average was 3.3±1.9 doses; only in 8 of the patients was the prophylactic antimicrobial administered at the correct time; only 1 patient received the correct regimen, 1 single dose, 1 hour before the start of surgery. The cost of antimicrobial prophylaxis per patient was 15.7 USD. Conclusions: This study allowed us to verify the lack of application of existing guidelines in the use of antimicrobials in surgical prophylaxis, which demonstrates: i) the need to review and standardize prescription behavior related to surgical prophylaxis, ii) the importance of developing and disseminating an antimicrobial management guide and iii) the need to monitor its implementation.

Uso profiláctico de antimicrobianos fuera de la práctica quirúrgica y de procedimientos invasivos: bases conceptuales y operativas / Prophylactic use of antimicrobials outside surgical and invasive-procedure settings: conceptual and operational basis

El uso preventivo de antimicrobianos es de larga data y no se restringe a antibacterianos. Lo más consensuado y estructurado es la profilaxis antimicrobiana perioperatoria y ante procedimientos invasivos. Fuera de este contexto hay gran cantidad de situaciones, menos caracterizadas, con riesgo de infecciones en que se usan ampliamente, muchas veces con menor sistematización. Esta presentación presenta las bases conceptuales y operativas de este segundo tipo de profilaxis. Conceptualmente la profilaxis primaria pretende evitar la infección por agente único conocido o variados, por exposición ambiental o susceptibilidad específica de ese hospedero y es implementable antes o después de la exposición. Producida esta infección la meta de la profilaxis secundaria intenta evitar la enfermedad y puede tomar dos modalidades, en infecciones sin evidencias de enfermedad clínica o daños, la profilaxis corresponde a "tratamiento de infección latente" y, si aún en ausencia de manifestaciones clínicas, hay elementos de laboratorio precoces premonitorios de progresión, la profilaxis se denomina "tratamiento anticipatorio". Se presentan operacionalmente y resumidas las situaciones en contexto médico no invasivo con uso potencial preventivo de antimicrobianos en base a agentes posibles, situaciones ambientales de riesgo, vulnerabilidad del hospedero, medicamentos a usar, su duración y efectividad con enfoque mayoritario en medicina de adultos.

Antimicrobial use with preventive purpose probably began shortly after its therapeutic use, especially antibiotics. More consensus and sistematization exist with perioperative and invasive procedures prophylaxis. However, beyond that context, there is great number of non invasive medical situations with high risk of secondary infections either by acquisition of pathogens or activation of latent ones, in which antimicrobials are routinely used with preventive purpose, albeit with less sistematization and consensus. This presentation aims to lay down the conceptual and operational basis for antimicrobial prophylaxis in these settings, whose objective is preventing an infection (primary prophylaxis) by a known or a variety of pathogens, either by person to person transmission, enviromental exposure or particular susceptibility of the host, and can be implemented before or after exposure. If already infected, the antimicrobial prophylaxis goal is to avoid progression to disease (secondary prevention) and may take two conceptual approaches; first, without clinical disease but significant risk of progression, the modality can be called "treatment of latent infection". In the second, also clinically asymptomatic, but with premonitory laboratoy signs of impending progression present, early use of antimicrobial is called "preemptive treatment". This presentation will describe the most frequent medical situations where preventive use of antimicrobials is employed, together with the medications most consensually used, according to the host, the agent(s) and medical situation, with emphasis in adults.

Consenso de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectología para el manejo de episodios de neutropenia febril en adultos y niños con cáncer / Consensus of the Chilean Society of Infectious Diseases for the management of episodes of febrile neutropenia in adults and children with cancer

El Comité de Infecciones en Inmunocomprometidos de la Sociedad Chilena de Infectología presenta aquí una actualización en el Manejo de episodios de neutropenia febril en adultos y niños con cáncer, derivado de los grandes cambios ocurridos en los últimos años en el enfrentamiento de estos pacientes. Para estos efectos, un grupo multidisciplinario desarrolló recomendaciones en relación a: su enfrentamiento inicial, exámenes de laboratorio requeridos, el tratamiento antimicrobiano inicial empírico y frente a focos infecciosos conocidos, las infecciones fúngicas invasoras y profilaxis antimicrobiana.

The Committee of Infections in Immunocompromised Patients of the Chilean Society of Infectious Diseases presents an update in the Management of febrile neutropenia in adults and children with cancer. It comes from the significant changes that occurred in recent years in the confrontation of these patients. For which a multidisciplinary task force group developed recommendations in relation to their initial handling, laboratory exams required, the initial empirical antimicrobial treatment and in front of known infectious focus, invasive fungal infections and antimicrobial prophylaxis.

Incidence of fever and bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Despite relative agreement on the need for immediate peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), there is no consensus regarding antibiotic use the days leading up to PCNL. This study aimed to report the incidence of complications during and after PCNL based on a cohort study design. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We included 101 patients in a prospective schedule for PCNL. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In the exposed patients (positive urine culture) the antibiotic was indicated according to the antibiogram report, 7 days before surgery, and 7 days after surgery, and in the non-exposed patient's intravenous antibiotic empirically was administered 8 h and 1 h before surgery. RESULTS: The incidence of complications for both groups was 19%. The exposed group presented complications in 27%, and 16% for the non-exposed. The relative risk of complications, in general, was 1.68 (95% CI, 0.77-3.6), the attributable risk was 11.09, and the percentage of attributable risk was 40.68%. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of positive urine culture is the main risk factor for the development of post-PCNL fever. Each treatment center needs to standardize its protocols to reduce the morbidity associated with surgery and to identify the main risk factors.

OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio es reportar la incidencia de complicaciones durante y después de la nefrolitotomía percutánea (NLP) con base en un diseño de cohorte prospectivo. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron 101 pacientes de forma prospectiva programados para NLP. Los pacientes fueron divididos en 2 grupos. En el grupo de expuestos (cultivo de orina positivo) el antibiótico se indicó según el reporte del antibiograma, 7 días antes y 7 días después de la cirugía. En los pacientes no expuestos (cultivo de orina negativo) se administró empíricamente antibiótico intravenoso 8 h y 1 h antes de la cirugía. RESULTADOS: La incidencia de complicaciones para ambos grupos fue del 19%. El grupo de expuestos presentó ­complicaciones en 27% mientras que para los no expuestos fue de 16%. El riesgo relativo de complicaciones en general fue de 1.68 (IC 95%, 0.77-3.6), el riesgo atribuible fue de 11.09 y el porcentaje de riesgo atribuible fue de 40.68%. CONCLUSIONES: la presencia de urocultivo positivo es el principal factor de riesgo para el desarrollo de fiebre post-NLP. Es importante que cada centro de tratamiento estandarice sus protocolos para reducir la morbilidad asociada con la cirugía e identificar los principales factores de riesgo.

Removal of antimicrobial prophylaxis and its effect on swine carriage of antimicrobial-resistant coliforms.

The use of antimicrobials in the food animal industry has caused an increased prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria and antimicrobial resistance genes, which can be transferred to the microbiota of humans through the food chain or the environment. To reduce the development and spread of antimicrobial resistance, restrictions on antimicrobial use in food animals have been implemented in different countries. We investigated the impact of an antimicrobial restriction intervention during two generations of pigs. Fecal samples were collected in five growth phases. The frequency of antimicrobial-resistant coliforms and antimicrobial-resistant bacteria or antimicrobial resistance genes was analyzed. No differences in the richness or abundance of antimicrobial-resistant coliforms or antimicrobial resistance genes were found when animals fed with or without prophylactic antimicrobials were compared. Withholding antimicrobial supplementation did not negatively affect weight gain in pigs. Withdrawal of prophylactic antimicrobial consumption during two generations of pigs was not enough to reduce the prevalence of antimicrobial resistance genes, as measured by richness and abundance markers. This study indicates that the fitness costs associated with bacterial carriage of some antimicrobial resistance genes are low.

Higher Prevalence of Extended-Spectrum Cephalosporin-Resistant Enterobacterales in Dogs Attended for Enteric Viruses in Brazil Before and After Treatment with Cephalosporins.

The extensive use of antibiotics is a leading cause for the emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among dogs. However, the impact of using antibiotics to treat viral infections on AMR remains unknown. In this study, we compared the prevalence of extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (ESCR-E) between dogs with a suspected infection of canine parvovirus (CPV) and canine distemper (CDV) before and after treatment with third-generation cephalosporins. We found a higher prevalence of ESCR-E faecal carriage in dogs suspected of CPV (37%) and CDV (15%) compared to dogs with noninfectious pathologies (9%) even prior to the start of their treatment. A 7-day course of ceftriaxone or ceftiofur administrated to CPV and CDV-suspected dogs substantially increased their ESCR-E faecal carriage during treatment (85% for CPV and 57% for CDV), and 4 weeks after the treatment ended (89% for CPV and 60% for CDV) when dogs were back in their households. Most of the observed resistance was carried by ESCR-E. coli carrying blaCTX-M genes. Our results suggest the need to optimize prophylactic antibiotic therapy in dogs treated for a suspected viral infection to prevent ESCR-E emergence and spread in the community.

Latin American consensus on uncomplicated recurrent urinary tract infection-2018.

An estimated 20-30% of adult women who experience an initial urinary tract infection (UTI) will have recurrent infection. In these patients, prophylaxis may be considered to improve their quality of life and control overuse of antibiotics. Despite this need, there is currently no Latin American consensus on the treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs. This consensus, signed by a panel of regional and international experts on UTI management, aims to address this need and is the first step toward a Latin American consensus on a number of urogynecological conditions. The panel agrees that antibiotics should be considered the primary treatment option for symptomatic UTI, taking into account local pathogen resistance patterns. Regarding prophylaxis, immunoactive therapy with the bacterial lysate OM-89 received a grade A recommendation and local estrogen in postmenopausal women grade B recommendation. Lower-grade recommendations include behavior modification and D-mannose; probiotics (Lactobacilli), cranberries, and hyaluronic acid (and derivatives) received limited recommendations; their use should be discussed with the patient. Though considered effective and receiving grade A recommendation, antimicrobial prophylaxis should be considered only following prophylaxis with effective non-antimicrobial measures that were not successful and chosen based on the frequency of sexual intercourse and local pathogen resistance patterns.

Uso de antibióticos profilácticos en pacientes sometidos a cirugías electivas limpias. Estudio prospectivo comparativo / Use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing clean elective surgeries. Comparative prospective study

El uso indiscriminado de antibióticos y el mal manejo de los mismos por parte del personal médico es un problema frecuente a nivel mundial, esto ha incrementado la resistencia bacteriana, los costos del tratamiento y ha creado la necesidad de contar con nuevos antibióticos, frecuentemente más costosos y de mayor toxicidad.Objetivo : evaluar el uso de antibióticos profilácticos en pacientes sometidos a cirugías electivas limpias, en centros privados del estado Aragua, en el periodo comprendido entre febrero y agosto del año 2019.Métodos : estudio prospectivo, observacional, comparativo, longitudinal. La muestra fue no probabilística intencional, se dividió en 2 grupos: grupo A, a quienes se les administró antibioticoterapia profiláctica, y un grupo B, a quienes no se les administró antibiótico.Resultados : Se incluyeron 49 pacientes sometidos a cirugías electivas limpias de tipo colecistectomías (14/28.57%), herniorrafía umbilical (6/12.24%) y hernioplastia inguinal (29/59.18%). La edad promedio fue de 37,7±12,17 años. Predomino el sexo masculino. Al quinto día del postoperatorio no se observaron signos de complicación infecciosa en los grupos A y B. Al décimo día de postoperatorio se observaron signos de complicación infecciosa en un paciente (4.3%) perteneciente al grupo A. No se observó complicación infecciosa en el grupo sin administración de antibiótico, grupo B.Conclusión : La indicación y mantenimiento por 7-10 días de antibiótico profiláctico en cirugía limpia no presenta diferencia en la presentación de complicaciones infecciosas comparado con la no administración de antibióticos para este tipo de cirugía, con el riesgo potencial de producción de efectos adversos y desarrollo de resistencia bacteriana(AU)

The indiscriminate use of antibiotics and their mishandling by medical personnel is a frequent problem worldwide, which has increased bacterial resistance, treatment costs and the need for new antibiotics, often more expensive and of greater toxicity.Objective : to evaluate the use of prophylactic antibiotics in patients undergoing clean elective surgeries, in private centers in the Aragua state, in the period between February and August of 2019.Methods : we conducted a prospective, longitudinal, observational, analytical epidemiological clinical study. The participants consisted of non-probabilistic sample of the intentional type of 49 patients of the total study population, undergoing elective surgery, cholecystectomy (14 / 28.57%), umbilical herniorrhaphy (6 / 12.24%) and inguinal hernioplasty (29 /59.18%). The sample was classified into 2 groups, a group A, who received prophylactic antibiotic therapy and a group B, who did not receive it.Results : the mean age was 37.7 ± 12.17 years, predominantly male. On the fifth day of the postoperative period, no signs of infectious complication were observed neither in group A nor in group B. On the tenth day after the postoperative period, signs of infectious complication were observed in one patient (4.3%) belonging to the antibiotic administration group. No infectious complication was observed in the group without antibiotic administration.Conclusion : it was confirmed that the administration of antibiotics does not reduce the incidence of infection, when comparing an experimental group with a control group(AU)

Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review

ABSTRACTCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: The appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the perioperative period may reduce the rate of infection in the surgical site. The purpose of this review was to evaluate adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.METHODS:The present systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. The databases selected for this review were: Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and Portal (BVS) with selection of articles published in the 2004-2014 period from the Lilacs and Cochrane databases.RESULTS:The search recovered 859 articles at the databases, with a total of 18 studies selected for synthesis. The outcomes of interest analyzed in the articles were as follows: appropriate indication of antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 70.3% to 95%), inappropriate indication (ranging from 2.3% to 100%), administration of antibiotic at the correct time (ranging from 12.73% to 100%), correct antibiotic choice (ranging from 22% to 95%), adequate discontinuation of antibiotic (ranging from 5.8% to 91.4%), and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 0.3% to 84.5%).CONCLUSIONS:Significant variations were observed in all the outcomes assessed, and all the studies indicated a need for greater adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis: a review.

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES: The appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis in the perioperative period may reduce the rate of infection in the surgical site. The purpose of this review was to evaluate adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS: The present systematic review was performed according to the Cochrane Collaboration methodology. The databases selected for this review were: Medline (via PubMed), Scopus and Portal (BVS) with selection of articles published in the 2004-2014 period from the Lilacs and Cochrane databases. RESULTS: The search recovered 859 articles at the databases, with a total of 18 studies selected for synthesis. The outcomes of interest analyzed in the articles were as follows: appropriate indication of antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 70.3% to 95%), inappropriate indication (ranging from 2.3% to 100%), administration of antibiotic at the correct time (ranging from 12.73% to 100%), correct antibiotic choice (ranging from 22% to 95%), adequate discontinuation of antibiotic (ranging from 5.8% to 91.4%), and adequate antibiotic prophylaxis (ranging from 0.3% to 84.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Significant variations were observed in all the outcomes assessed, and all the studies indicated a need for greater adherence to guidelines for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.

Profilaxis antimicrobiana en cirugía ortopédica: cefazolina vs cefadroxilo IV / Antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery: cefazolina vs cefadroxilo IV

Toda intervención quirúrgica está expuesta a infectarse. La necesidad de profilaxis antimicrobiana en cirugía ortopédica para casos quirúrgicos agudos o electivas de cirugías limpias ha sido establecida como procedimiento de rutina. En Cirugía Ortopédica y Traumatología cuando se requiere el uso de implantes metálicos con el fin de realizar osteosíntesis o sustitución de las superficies articulares, aumenta el riesgo de infección, por tratarse de materiales extraños que son introducidos en el organismo. En estos casos la antibióticoterapia preventiva es de primordial importancia. Se realizó un estudio de profilaxis antimicrobiana, multicéntrico, aleatorizado, prospectivo, doble ciego, comparativo de grupos paralelos, con el fin de evaluar la eficacia de Cefadroxilo I.V. Vs. Cefazolina I.V. como antibióticos profilácticos mediante la determinación del número de pacientes infectados en cirugía de fracturas cerradas en la cuales se colocó material de síntesis. Se completaron 58 pacientes, 34 en el grupo de cefadroxilo y 24 en el grupo de cefazolina, al inicio los grupos fueron similares en cuanto a edad, sexo, tipo de fractura, tiempo de intervención, tiempo entre la fractura y la intervención.Más pacientes en el grupo de cefadroxilo tenían el tiempo máximo autorizado entre la fractura y la intervención (p: 0,07). Se presentó en el grupo de cefadroxilo una infección de la herida operatoria y un caso de eritema leve que cedió con tratamiento oral con cefadroxilo, sin diferencias entre los grupos.Hubo tres casos de eventos adversos, reacción anafiláctica a las 48 horas en el grupo de cefazolina que ameritó finalización de protocolo y hematoma en miembro inferior derecho y, en el grupo de cefadroxilo, una elevación discreta de enzimas hepáticas. La respuesta terapéutica de profilaxis antimicrobianano mostró diferencia entre los grupos. El cefadroxilo es tan eficaz como la cefazolina para la profilaxis antimicrobiana en pacientes con fracturas...

Any operation is exposed to infection. The need for antimicrobial prophylaxis in orthopedic surgery for acute or elective surgical cases of clean surgery is established as a routine procedure. Orthopedic Surgery when required the use of metallic implants in order to perform internal fixation or replacement of the articular surfaces, increases the risk of infection because they are foreign materials are introduced into the body. In these cases, preventive antibiotic therapy is very important. We performed a study of antimicrobialprophylaxis multicenter, randomized, prospective, double-blind, parallel group comparison in order to evaluate the effectiveness of Cefadroxil IV vs. Cefazolin I.V. as prophylactic antibiotics by determining the number of infected patients after fracture surgery in which synthetic material was placed. Fifty eigth patients were completed, 34 in the cefadroxil group and 24 in the cefazolin group, at the beginning the groups were similar in age, sex, fracture type, operative time, time between fracture and surgery. More patients in the cefadroxil group had the maximum allo-wable time between the fracture and surgery. (P: 0.07). In the cefadroxil group we found a wound infection and one case of mild erythema which resolved with oral treatment with cefadroxil, without differences between groups. There were three cases of adverse events, anaphylactic reaction to cefazolin at 48 h in the group that required finalization of protocol and hematoma in right leg and in the cefadroxil group, a moderate increase in liver enzymes. The therapeutic response of antimicrobial prophylaxis showed no difference between groups. Cefadroxil is as effective as cefazolin for antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients with fractures that warrant placement of synthetic material

Profilaxis antimicrobiana en cirugía mayor electiva otorrinolaringológica / Antimicrobial prophylaxis related to otorhinolaryngology elective major surgery

La profilaxis antimicrobiana disminuye las infecciones quirúrgicas, pero su empleo indiscriminado favorece el incremento de las tasas de infección, pues la resistencia bacteriana es mucho más probable en presencia de antibióticos. El objetivo de esta investigación fue evaluar los resultados de la antibioticoprofilaxis en la cirugía mayor electiva otorrinolaringológica. Se realizó una investigación retrospectiva-descriptiva del uso profiláctico de antibióticos en cirugía mayor electiva en el Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital Comandante Manuel Fajardo, durante 6 años (2001-2006). El universo estuvo constituido por 661 pacientes y se estudiaron variables como sexo, edad y criterios de respuesta terapéutica (satisfactorio e insatisfactorio). Según la envergadura de la intervención, se administró antibioticoprofilaxis oral o parenteral y se realizó cultivo del sitio de la herida quirúrgica. Predominó el sexo masculino (54,1 por ciento) y el grupo etario de 31 a 62 años. Requirió profilaxis antibiótica el 41,90 por ciento de los pacientes operados. Ocurrió un 7,9 por ciento de infecciones de la herida quirúrgica. Los microorganismos más frecuentemente aislados fueron Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter y Escherichia coli. En las cirugías oncológicas de cabeza y cuello, el promedio de infecciones fue elevado (42,3 por ciento). La evolución tórpida se debió a la concurrencia de factores de riesgo de infección. No se reportaron eventos adversos ni complicaciones graves. En otorrinolaringología, la profilaxis antimicrobiana funciona contra una amplia gama de microorganismos, pero no ocurre así en las cirugías oncológicas

Antimicrobial prophylaxis decreases the surgical infections, but its indiscriminate use to favors the increment of infection rates and the bacterial resistance is much more probable in presence of antibiotics. The aim of present research was to evaluate the results of antibiotic prophylaxis in the otorhinolaryngology elective major surgery. A retrospective-descriptive research was made on the prophylactic use of antibiotics in this type of surgery in the Otorhinolaryngology Service of the Comandant Manuel Fajardo during 6 years (2001-2006). Sample included 661 patients and the following variables were studied: sex, age and therapeutic response criteria (satisfactory and non-satisfactory). According to the intervention complexity oral antibiotic or parenteral prophylaxis was administered carrying out a surgical hound site culture. There was a predominance of male sex (54,1 percent) and the 31 and 62 age group. The 41,90 percent of patients operated on required antibiotic prophylaxis. The was a 7,9 percent of surgical wound infections. The more frequent microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Enterobacter and Escherichia. In head and neck oncology surgeries infection average was high (42,3 percent). Torpid course was due to concurrence of infection risk factors. There were neither adverse events nor severe complications. In Otorhinolaryngology, antimicrobial prophylaxis works against a wide variety of microorganisms but not in the Oncology surgeries

Successful control program to implement the appropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section

OBJECTIVE: Describe implementation of a successful program to reduce doses (cefazolin 2 to 1 g) used for antimicrobial prophylaxis. METHODS: Evaluation of an intervention program to reduce prophylactic antimicrobial doses. The intervention included weekly staff discussions, automatic dispensation of 1g-vial of cefazolin by the pharmacy unless expressly requested by surgeon and increase in post-discharge surveillance as a strategy to reassure surgeons of the safety of the reduction. In the pre and post intervention periods, a prospective study of antimicrobial consumption and surgical site infections were measured. RESULTS: There were 5,164 and 5,204 deliveries in 2001-2002 and 2003-2004, respectively; 1,524 (29.5 percent) and 1,363 (26 percent) were cesarean sections. There was a 45 percent decrease in cefazolin vials used on average per cesarean section (2.29 to 1.25). Patients evaluated increased from 16 percent to 67 percent and the SSI rates in both periods were 3.34 percent to 2.42 percent, respectively. CONCLUSION: An ample intervention, including administrative and educational measures, led to high compliance with dose reduction and saved more than US$4,000 in cefazolin, considered important because government reimbursement in Brazil for cesarean section is $80.

OBJETIVO: descrever a implantação de um programa de redução de doses usadas para profilaxia antimicrobiana em cesárea. MÉTODOS: Descrição a implantação de um programa de redução de profilaxia com cefazolina de 2 g para 1 g através de discussões semanais com profissionais, dispensação automática de frascos de 1 g de cefazolina pela farmácia exceto quando feito pedido expresso pelo cirurgião. Houve um trabalho para aumentar a vigilância pós alta, com o objetivo de tranquilizar os cirurgiões quanto à segurança da nova dose. Foi realizada uma avaliação prospectiva, antes e depois da implantação do programa, do consumo de cefazolina e das taxas de infecção obtidas por vigilância durante a hospitalização e após a alta. RESULTADOS: Houve 5.164 e 5.204 partos em 2001-2 e 2003-4, respectivamente, sendo que 1.524 (29,5 por cento) e 1.363 (26 por cento) foram cesáreas. Houve uma queda de consumo de frascos de cefazolina de 45 por cento (2,29 para 1,25 por cesárea). O número de pacientes avaliados para infecção hospitalar aumentou de 16 por cento para 67 por cento, e as taxas de infecção foram 3,34 por cento e 2,42 por cento, respectivamente. CONCLUSÃO: Uma intervenção ampla, que incluiu medidas administrativas e educacionais, levou a uma alta adesão ao programa de redução de dose profilática em cesárea e permitiu uma economia acima de US$ 4.000 apenas considerando custos com cefazolina. Esta pode ser considerada importante especialmente porque o reembolso do SUS para parto cesárea é aproximadamente US$ 80.