Midterm Results after Tibiotalar or Tibiotalocalcaneal Fusion Using an Ilizarov External Fixator.

Background: Ankle fusion is considered a treatment of choice for end-stage ankle arthritis when a total ankle replacement procedure is not indicated. However, the potential risk of secondary arthritis in the adjacent joint after ankle fusion raises arguments on whether preserving the adjacent joint during an isolated tibiotalar (TT) fusion brings about any future benefits with regard to pain and gait discomfort. In this study, we intended to present midterm results following TT or tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator and to investigate whether spontaneous fusion occurred in the subtalar or midtarsal joint. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study. Medical records of patients who underwent TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint between 1994 and 2018 were manually searched. Forty-one patients were included and the status of the joints adjacent to the fusion site was evaluated in radiographic examinations. Results: Of the 34 patients who underwent TT fusion, 30 patients (88.3%) had a spontaneous fusion in the adjacent joints. Specifically, 11 patients (29.4%) had subtalar joint fusion and 19 patients (55.9%) had both midtarsal joint and subtalar joint fusion. In TTC fusion, the midtarsal joint was spontaneously fused in all 7 patients. Conclusions: In this study, we observed spontaneous adjacent joint fusion following TT or TTC fusion using an Ilizarov external fixator for substantial bone defects around the ankle joint. Although a careful approach should be made since patients treated in this study may not represent typical candidates that need primary joint-sacrificing procedures, we believe that this study may draw attention from surgeons concerned about the fate of the adjacent joint status after TT or TTC fusion.

Clinical and radiological outcome of stand-alone percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). A propensity-matched cohort study.

In adult patients affected by degenerative disc disease with lumbar instability and chronic low back pain, spine surgery with lumbar fixation aims to reduce segmental instability and pain. Different techniques have been developed, but the optimal surgical technique remains controversial. No studies have compared the clinical and radiological outcomes between stand-alone pedicle screw fixation (SAPF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF). This was a retrospective study. All patients who underwent surgery for single-level L4-L5 or L5-S1 lumbar stenosis, associated with minor lumbar instability and treated with SAPF or MI-TLIF techniques were included in the study. Data were collected preoperatively and at 24 monts follow-up. Clinical primary outcomes were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). Secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, walking ability and self reported back and leg pain. In addition, perioperative data and complications were recorded. Segmental lordosis (L4-L5 and L5-S1) and overall lumbar lordosis (L1-S1) were measured on lumbar X-Rays preoperatively and at least 24 months postoperatively. 277 patients were firstly identified. Baseline data and a minimum of two-year follow-up were available for 62 patients. After the propensity score matching, 44 patients (22 patients in the SAPF group and 22 patients in the MI-TLIF group) were matched. At 24 months follow-up, no difference between the two groups of patients in NRS (p = 0.11) and ODI scores (p = 0.21) were observed. Patients' satisfaction at follow-up was also not significantly different between the two groups. In both groups, a significant improvement in the walked distance was observed after surgery (p = 0.05) while no difference was observed regarding the type of surgery performed (p = 1.00). No differences were found in the pre- and post-operative median lumbar lordosis (p = 0.91 and p = 0.67) and the same findings were observed for lumbar segmental lordosis (p = 0.65 and p = 0.41 respectively). Significant improvements in ODI and NRS-scores were recorded after 24 months follow-up with both SAPF and MI-TLIF. No significant differences in postoperative PROMs and patients' satisfaction were observed between the groups. The results of our study indicate no superiority of either surgical technique concerning pain and functional outcomes after 24 months.

Ulnocarpal arthrodesis as a new treatment for ectrodactyly in a dog and a cat.

CASE HISTORY: A 4-month-old male Shih Tzu dog (Case 1) and an 11-month-old female Devon Rex cat (Case 2) were referred to specialist veterinary hospitals for evaluation of right thoracic lameness and growth abnormality in the distal aspect of the forelimb. CLINICAL FINDINGS: Non-weight-bearing lameness and decreased range of motion were noted in the affected limbs of both cases. Case 1 had a plantigrade stance, and a cleft separation between the first and second digits extending upwards to the distal third of the antebrachium. There was no pain on palpation, and the affected limb was shorter than the contralateral. Radiographic examination revealed cleft separation between metacarpal bones I and II, and carpal bone fusion (I, II, III), and the distal radius ended freely and was attached to the first metacarpal bone.Case 2 had a small cleft medial to metacarpal III. The limb was consistently held in abduction and had marked carpal varus. The limb had never been used for weight bearing. Radiographic examination showed agenesis of metacarpal bone II and separation of metacarpals I and III. The radius and ulna were separated and the radial head did not articulate normally at the elbow, leading to marked elbow incongruity. DIAGNOSIS: Ectrodactyly in both cases. TREATMENT AND OUTCOME: Amputation of the radius followed by ulnocarpal arthrodesis were performed in both cases. Follow-up evaluations up to 1 year (Case 1) and 10 weeks (Case 2) after surgery indicated satisfactory arthrodesis fusion, owner satisfaction, and a good clinical outcome. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ectrodactyly is a rare congenital deformity of the forelimb with a heterogeneous character, requiring an individualised treatment plan. These are the first cases reported in the literature of ectrodactyly in small animals that were treated successfully with ulnocarpal arthrodesis. This case series therefore provides evidence in support of this treatment option for this heterogeneous congenital deformity.

A biomechanical study comparing the compression force and osseous area of contact of two screws fixation techniques used in ankle joint arthrodesis model.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of a (diseased) ankle joint is usually performed to achieve pain relief and stability. One basic principle of arthrodesis techniques includes rigid fixation of the surfaces until union. It seems plausible that stable anchoring and homogeneous pressure distribution should be advantageous, however, it has not been investigated yet. The aim is to achieve uniform compression, as this is expected to produce favorable results for the bony fusion of the intended arthrodesis. Numerous implants with different biomechanical concepts can be used for ankle fusion. In this study, headless compression screws (HCS, DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland) were compared biomechanically to an alternative fixation System, the IOFix device (Extremity Medical, Parsippany, NJ, USA) in regard to the distribution of the compression force (area of contact) and peak compression in a sawbone arthrodesis-model (Sawbones® Pacific Research Laboratories, Vashon, WA, USA). This study aims to quantify the area of contact between the bone interface that can be obtained using headless compression screws compared to the IOFix. In current literature, it is assumed, that a large contact surface with sufficient pressure between the bones brings good clinical results. However, there are no clinical or biomechanical studies, that describe the optimal compression pressure for an arthrodesis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two standardized sawbone blocks were placed above each other in a custom-made jig. IOFix and headless compression screws were inserted pairwise parallel to each other using a template for a uniform drilling pattern. All screws were inserted with a predefined torque of 0.5 Nm. Pressure transducers positioned between the two sawbone blocks were compressed for the measurement of peak compression force, compression distribution, and area of contact. RESULTS: With the IOFix, the compression force was distributed over significantly larger areas compared to the contact area of the HCS screws, resulting in a more homogenous contact area over the entire arthrodesis surface. Maximum compression force showed no significant difference. CONCLUSION: The IOFix system distributes the compression pressure over a much larger area, resulting in more evenly spread compression at the surface. Clinical studies must show whether this leads to a lower pseudarthrosis rate.

Does the proximal screw type affect stress and strain in pastern arthrodesis with locking plate in horses?

The implantation of unicortical cortex screws in the proximal hole of locking compression plates (LCP) has been recommended for proximal interphalangeal (PIP) arthrodesis in horses to prevent fractures resulting from stress risers in the proximal phalanx (P1). However, this cortex screw fixation technique may limit efficient dorsal compression of the PIP joint by the plate, potentially affecting the stability of the construct. In this study, we aimed to measure stress and strain in P1 and the plate using an ex vivo model of PIP arthrodesis in horses. We employed various implantation methods and proximal screw types in conjunction with two 5.5 mm transarticular cortex screws. Ten pairs of equine forelimbs were divided into four groups based on proximal screw placement: GUC (unicortically placed cortex screw), GBC (bicortically placed cortex screw), GUL (unicortically placed locking screw), and GBL (bicortically placed locking screw). We calculated the magnitude and direction of strain, strain ratio, and stress using strain gauges during an axial compression mechanical testing. The palmar surface of P1 exhibited higher stress and strains than the dorsal surface, with the plate part located at the articular level suffered more stress than the proximal part. Both the implantation method and proximal screw type significantly influenced the analyzed parameters. The GUC promoted greater changes in strain direction in the proximal portion of the P1. Bicortical placement of a cortex screw appears to be the most suitable option for filling the proximal hole of the LCP, because it allows effective dynamic compression via the plate and prevents abrupt shifts in the direction of the forces acting on the proximal part of P1 during loading.

Nonunion After First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: The Association With Shoe Size.

INTRODUCTION: First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis is a common treatment for various foot conditions, with nonunion as a frequent complication. The incidence of nonunion varies widely in the literature. In particular, males have a higher risk of nonunion than females. This is possibly due to biomechanical and anatomical differences, as men have on average larger feet than women. This study therefore aims to explore whether shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, affects nonunion rates and could explain the gender disparity in nonunion rates. METHODOLOGY: An exploratory analysis of retrospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary first MTPJ arthrodesis in a single secondary hospital between January 2012 and December 2019. Additional data on body weight, height, and shoe size were prospectively collected from patients. RESULTS: Among 261 included patients, 57 (21.8%) experienced nonunion. Nonunion incidence was higher in males (18, 26.9%) than in females (39, 20.1%). Self-reported shoe size showed no significant association with nonunion in both univariate and multivariate analyses. DISCUSSION: The study's findings suggest that shoe size, as a proxy for foot size, is not associated with nonunion after the first MTPJ arthrodesis. Despite observing a gender difference in nonunion rates, this disparity could not be explained by shoe size. CONCLUSIONS: Shoe size as a proxy for foot size appears to have no clinical association with nonunion following the first MTPJ arthrodesis.

Comparison of the outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis by locking plate and compression screw in patients with severe hallux valgus or hallux valgus revision.

INTRODUCTION: Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTP1) is indicated for hallux rigidus, septic arthritis, severe hallux valgus (HV) or HV revision. Few studies have compared the functional and radiographic outcomes between indications. The goal of this study was to compare the results of MTP1 arthrodesis in patients with severe HV or HV revision at 6 months postoperative. The hypothesis was that there are no differences in the fusion rate, functional scores and radiological correction between the two groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study conducted between January 1, 2018 and July 31, 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients treated for severe HV or HV revision by MTP1 arthrodesis with a compression screw and locking plate who were at least 18 years of age. The exclusion criteria were a history of septic arthritis of MTP1 without prior HV surgery, primary hallux rigidus, rheumatoid arthritis, incomplete medical record. The functional outcomes consisted of the Foot Function Index (FFi-f) and the European Foot and Ankle Society (EFAS) score. Radiographs were made to evaluate preoperative and postoperative deformity, the correction and the fusion rate. These outcomes were compared between two groups: severe HV and HV revision. RESULTS: An analysis was done of 58 cases of MTP1 arthrodesis: 45 severe HV and 13 HV revisions. The mean patient age was 66 years, and the mean follow-up was 15.7 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the postoperative functional scores: EFAS (p = 0.85) and FFI-f (p = 0.14). At the final review, there were no significant differences between the two groups in the foot angle measurements (hallux valgus angle, p = 0.08 and intermetatarsal angle, p = 0.15) and fusion rate (p = 0.89) with a 93% fusion rate in patients with severe HV and 92% in patients with HV revision. CONCLUSION: Given the good radiographic and functional outcomes, MTP1 arthrodesis by locking plate and compression screw is indicated as a first line surgical treatment for patients with severe HV or for patients undergoing HV revision. There is no evidence of a significant difference in the functional scores, fusion rate and radiographic correction between these two indications. LEVEL OF PROOF: IV; retrospective case series.

Open reduction and internal fixation of a radius and ulna fracture in a patient with an elbow arthrodesis: a case report.

This case report outlines the effective use of the Titanium Elastic Nail System (TENS) for treating a peri-implant mid-shaft radius and ulna fracture in a patient with previous elbow arthrodesis and rotational full-thickness flap coverage. Given the paucity of literature surrounding this complex problem, we present a minimally - invasive treatment option which facilitated complete fracture healing, demonstrating the TENS's efficacy in complex orthopedic scenarios.

Effectiveness of synthetic versus autologous bone grafts in foot and ankle surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: All orthopaedic procedures, comprising foot and ankle surgeries, seemed to show a positive trend, recently. Bone grafts are commonly employed to fix bone abnormalities resulting from trauma, disease, or other medical conditions. This study specifically focuses on reviewing the safety and efficacy of various bone substitutes used exclusively in foot and ankle surgeries, comparing them to autologous bone grafts. METHODS: The systematic search involved scanning electronic databases including PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane online library, and Web of Science, employing terms like 'Bone substitute,' 'synthetic bone graft,' 'Autograft,' and 'Ankle joint.' Inclusion criteria encompassed RCTs, case-control studies, and prospective/retrospective cohorts exploring different bone substitutes in foot and ankle surgeries. Meta-analysis was performed using R software, integrating odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Cochrane's Q test assessed heterogeneity. RESULTS: This systematic review analyzed 8 articles involving a total of 894 patients. Out of these, 497 patients received synthetic bone grafts, while 397 patients received autologous bone grafts. Arthrodesis surgery was performed in five studies, and three studies used open reduction techniques. Among the synthetic bone grafts, three studies utilized a combination of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB homodimer (rhPDGF-BB) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (ß-TCP) collagen, while four studies used hydroxyapatite compounds. One study did not provide details in this regard. The meta-analysis revealed similar findings in the occurrence of complications, as well as in both radiological and clinical evaluations, when contrasting autografts with synthetic bone grafts. CONCLUSION: Synthetic bone grafts show promise in achieving comparable outcomes in radiological, clinical, and quality-of-life aspects with fewer complications. However, additional research is necessary to identify the best scenarios for their use and to thoroughly confirm their effectiveness. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Correction of progressive collapsing foot deformity classes after isolated arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis.

INTRODUCTION: Subtalar osteoarthritis in the context of flatfoot (recently renamed Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD)) may be treated through subtalar joint (SJ) arthrodesis with anticipated consequences on three-dimensional bony configuration. This study investigates the correction of PCFD-related deformities achieved after Anterolateral Arthroscopic Subtalar Arthrodesis (ALAPSTA). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we evaluated pre- and post-operative (at 6 months) weight bearing computed tomography (WBCT) images of patients diagnosed with PCFD with a degenerated SJ (2 A according to PCFD classification) and/or peritalar subluxation (2D) with or without associated flexible midfoot and/or forefoot deformities (1B, 1 C and 1E) which underwent ALAPSTA as a standalone procedure between 2017 and 2020. Multiple measurements were used to assess and compare pre and post-operative PCFD classes. RESULTS: Thirtythree PCFD (33 patients, median age 62) were included in the study. Preoperative medial facet subluxation was 28.3 % (IQR, 15.1 to 49.3 %). Overall PCFD 3D deformity improved with a reduction of the foot and ankle offset from 9.3 points (IQR, 7.8 to 12) to 4 (IQR, 0.9 to 7) (p < 0.001). Class A-hindfoot valgus (median tibiocalcaneal angle and median calcaneal moment arm improved by 9.4 degrees (p < 0.001) and 11 mm (p < 0.001), respectively), class B-midfoot abduction (median talonavicular coverage angle improved by 20.5 degrees, p < 0.001) and class C-forefoot varus (median sagittal talo-first metatarsal angle improved by 10.2 degrees (p < 0.001)) were significantly corrected after surgery. Class D was difficult to assess due to the fusion procedure. No patient had a pre-operative valgus deformity at the ankle (no class E), and no significant change of the talar tilt was observed (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: In this series, ALAPSTA performed as a standalone procedure to treat patients diagnosed with PCFD with a degenerated subtalar joint and/or peritalar subluxation was effective not only at correcting hindfoot alignment but also flexible midfoot abduction and flexible forefoot varus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Scaphocapitate arthrodesis with lunate preservation for Kienböck's disease: prospective outcomes study.

PURPOSE: The study evaluated the efficacy of SC arthrodesis with lunate preservation for treating patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IIIC Kienböck's disease, who also exhibit neutral ulnar variance. The study further aimed to explore potential variations in outcomes between patients diagnosed with stage IIIB and IIIC Kienböck's disease. METHODS: Thirty-two patients diagnosed with stage IIIB (n = 19) and stage IIIC (n = 13) Kienböck's disease underwent SC arthrodesis with distal radius bone grafting stabilised by Herbert compression screws. All participants underwent pre- and post-operative assessments including VAS score for pain, ROM, grip strength, MMWS, and the Quick DASH score. Additionally, RS angle, LHI ratio, and CHI ratio were assessed. RESULTS: For all patients, the mean operative time was 73 min, follow-up was 45.6 months, time to union was 14 weeks, and time to full return to work was 24 weeks. The rate of union at the arthrodesis site was 91% (29 out of 32 patients) whilst the incidence of postoperative degenerative arthritis was 36% (8 out of 32 patients). Regarding changes in the means of outcomes from pre- to post-operatively, the VAS score decreased from 8.2 to 1.3 and grip strength improved from 36 to 79%. The RS angle was corrected from 59° to 50°. Significant improvements were noted in the mean MMWS from 45 to 75 and QuickDASH score from 78 to 21. However, no significant changes were observed in ROM, LHI, and CHI. There were no significant differences between patients with stage IIIB and stage IIIC in terms of these parameters, except for differences observed in the RS angle, LHI, and CHI preoperatively and in LHI and CHI postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Evidence level: II. Our research demonstrates that SC arthrodesis is a valuable approach for reducing pain, improving grip strength, and enhancing overall function in individuals with advanced Kienböck's disease. Importantly, our results indicate no notable differences in outcomes between patients diagnosed with stage IIIB or IIIC Kienböck's disease.

Managing Kienbock Disease's Surgical Treatment and Outcome Analysis: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

A 38-year-old man without a severe traumatic history reported to the outpatient department (OPD) with wrist pain at the dorsal aspect, mild swelling, stiffness, and restricted mobility at the left wrist joint. The patient had been experiencing these symptoms for a year. There was sharp tenderness, graded as 4 above the lunate bone, on examination of the left wrist joint. Advanced imaging, which is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and radiographs suggested that the patient had Kienbock's illness. Typically, the surgical approach for Kienbock's used is wrist fusion or proximal row carpectomy. However, in this case, a novel strategy of bone grafting, scaphoid-capitate fusion, and lunate excision was adopted. This case report explains the outcome of our scaphoid-capitate arthrodesis, which was done to maintain functional mobility and relieve discomfort by halting the progression of carpal collapse and carpal-ulnar translation.

Splenic rupture following prone lateral discectomy and arthrodesis: illustrative case.

BACKGROUND: The prone lateral approach to lumbar spine surgery is known to have a multitude of potential complications, including damage to neurovascular structures, surrounding viscera, and intra-abdominal structures near the surgical site. However, iatrogenic injury to the spleen following prone lateral lumbar discectomy and arthrodesis as a potential complication has not yet been described in the literature. OBSERVATIONS: The authors present the case of a 71-year-old female with a history of L3-S1 laminectomy and L3-5 arthrodesis who underwent a prone lateral discectomy of L2-3 with arthrodesis of the endplates for chronic lower-back pain. On postoperative day 1, the patient developed hypotension unresponsive to pressor medications, significant abdominal pain, and anemia requiring 2 transfusions. Bedside ultrasound revealed free fluid in the abdomen. She then underwent an exploratory laparotomy for splenic injury. LESSONS: Although rare, splenic rupture should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis for patients with hemodynamic instability after lateral surgical approaches to the lumbar spine. Any patient with evidence of hypotension, anemia, and/or abdominal pain following lumbar surgery should be evaluated for splenic injury with an abdominal computed tomography scan and considered for surgical intervention. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23639.

Managing Hallux Rigidus in the Elite Athlete.

Hallux rigidus can present a difficult problem to both competitive and elite athletic populations. Once an appropriate diagnostic workup has been performed, nonoperative management strategies, including anti-inflammatory medications, injection therapies, shoewear modifications, and orthotic devices, represent the mainstay conservative management options. Surgical management can be considered where an athlete's athletic performance is limited. A joint-sparing cheilectomy can provide a predictable return to sport at the most elite levels. The addition of a proximal phalangeal osteotomy can be considered when necessary. Arthroplasty or arthrodesis techniques can be used for persistent symptoms or progressive disease, but with less predictable outcomes.

Arthrodesis for Hallux Rigidus.

First metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint fusion, or arthrodesis, has been a cornerstone treatment for advanced joint degeneration since the 1950s, benefiting not only older patients but also younger individuals. The procedure boasts favorable long-term outcomes and a low rate of revision when fusion is successful. However, complications such as interphalangeal arthritis may occur, and nonunion or malunion can necessitate revision. While the first MTP fusion provides significant relief, its applicability varies, underscoring the need for careful patient selection.

The Philosophy of Surgical Success and Outcomes of Cartiva Versus Fusion.

Noninferiority studies in surgery are, by their very nature, reductionist. They use multiple variables to generate a yes or no answer about the new device being tested. A binary outcome is appropriate for a regulatory agency such as the Food and Drug Administration, but the clinical situation is more nuanced. It is critical to understand the underlying philosophies and choices that go into trial design when a surgeon is recommending a new device. In the case of Cartiva, any of 3 reasonable alternative means of defining surgical success would have altered the final outcome of the MOTION trial. Additionally, using a more rigorous noninferiority margin rather than adding an additional cushion based upon the argument that motion alone had extra inherent value would have also led to failure of the trial to demonstrate noninferiority.

Effect of Prior Cheilectomy on Outcomes of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Fusion.

Cheilectomy, a joint-conserving procedure, is often a first-line choice for treating early stages of hallux rigidus. Recent evidence has revealed its efficacy in treating more advanced stages. However, when degeneration is profound, first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) fusion remains the most appropriate strategy. Nevertheless, it is common for surgeons to proceed initially with cheilectomy, reserving joint fusion for subsequent considerations if cheilectomy fails. This article will explore the relationship between the 2 procedures and evaluate the research surrounding the effect of prior cheilectomy on first MTP joint arthrodesis.

Metatarsophalangeal Arthroplasty in Hallux Rigidus.

First metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthroplasty provides hallux rigidus patients with pain relief and preserved motion, offering an alternative to arthrodesis. Recent advancements in implant technology and surgical techniques have broadened treatment options. Although good outcomes have been documented in the literature, concerns persist regarding increased complications, uncertain long-term efficacy, and challenges in managing failed arthroplasties. Addressing bone loss resulting from the procedure further complicates salvage procedures. Larger cohorts and extended studies are necessary to establish efficacy of first MTPJ arthroplasty. Decisions must weigh the trade-offs between pain relief and potential complications, requiring thorough patient-surgeon discussions.

Surgical Management of Failed First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty.

This article describes the etiology, clinical presentation, surgical management, and outcomes for treatment of the failed first metatarsophalangeal (MTP) joint arthroplasty. Failure following implant arthroplasty typically creates large osseous deficits and surgical management can be difficult. Salvage arthrodesis provides reliable joint stability while maintaining hallux length. Outcomes following conversion of a failed MTP joint arthroplasty to MTP joint arthrodesis have demonstrated consistent pain relief and high satisfaction: however, high rates of complication and nonunion have been reported. Bone graft may be necessary to fill large voids in the joint. Other revision options for failed arthroplasty have been described, but outcomes remain inconsistent and varied. Ultimately, conversion to MTP joint arthrodesis is the recommended intervention for treatment of the failed MTP arthroplasty implant, providing sufficient stability and pain relief.

Knee fusion versus above knee amputation as two options to deal with knee periprosthetic joint infection.

BACKGROUND: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) poses a significant challenge in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), with recurrence rates as high as 14-28%, leading to substantial morbidity and treatment costs. When conventional treatments fail, knee fusion and above-the-knee amputation (AKA) emerge as alternative options. Existing literature offers conflicting views on the efficacy and impact of knee fusion versus AKA with varied outcomes and limitations. METHODS: This retrospective national study spanning 2010-2022 investigates Knee Fusion and AKA as options for addressing Knee PJI. Utilizing PearlDiver Patient Records Database, procedural, and reimbursement data on over 100 million individuals from all the US was evaluated. Readmission rates, costs, and complications of the mentioned procedures were assessed using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes within a 90-day period and one-year post-operation. Statistical analyses, including chi-square tests and regression models, were conducted using integrated R software. RESULTS: The study reveals a substantial escalation (p < 0.0001) in the proportion of patients opting for AKA compared to arthrodesis. While age as a demographic factor showed no significant difference, arthrodesis patients exhibited lower comorbidity scores (3.6 ± 2.9 vs. 4.6 ± 3.4, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis correlated with higher 90-day thromboembolism rates (9.2% vs. 7.3%, p < 0.001), blood transfusion requirements (23.2% vs. 14.4%, p < 0.001), and acute renal failure incidence (p = 0.008) but demonstrated lower rates of urinary tract infections (p = 0.047) and cerebrovascular accidents (p < 0.001). At 1 year, arthrodesis was associated with higher infection rates (38.7% vs. 36.4%, p < 0.001). Arthrodesis patients had significant increased 90-day and 1-year readmission rates and hospitalization costs ($12,732 vs. $18,826, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found higher rates of 1-year thromboembolism, infection, acute renal failure, and readmission in the arthrodesis group. AKA patients had more sepsis and cerebrovascular accidents. A patient-centered conversation is best for persistent infections and failed revision TKA. Considering the patient's quality of life, goals, and health status, this discussion should cover each procedure's risks and complications.