ABSTRACT
Objective: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period. Results: We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52). Conclusion: Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario.
Subject(s)
Capecitabine , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Capecitabine/administration & dosage , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Adult , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/administration & dosage , AgedABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of capecitabine/cisplatin (XP) combined with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with non-metastatic anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC). METHOD AND MATERIALS: All patients with ASCC who received radical concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the past 8 years were screened. Patients who received XP or mitomycin/5-fluorouracil (MF) were selected and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: ASCC is an uncommon cancer, there were 36 patients were included in our study. The XP group and MF group included 18 patients each. The clinical complete response (cCR) rates in the XP group and the MF group were 94.4% and 88.9%, respectively (P = 1). The 2-year local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and colostomy-free survival (CFS) rates were higher in the XP group than in the MF group (100% vs 93.3%, P = 0.32). Hematologic toxicities, especially grade ≥ 3 leukopenia (11.1% vs 44.4%, P = 0.06) and neutropenia (5.6% vs 61.1%, P = 0.001), were lower in the XP group than MF group. As a result of fewer side effects, fewer patients in the XP group demanded the dose reduction of chemotherapy (11.1% vs 50%, P = 0.03) and radiation interruption (55.6% vs 77.8%, P = 0.289). Delayed radiotherapy was shorter in the XP group (2.5 vs 6.5 days, P = 0.042) than in the MF group. CONCLUSION: The XP regimen was as effective as the MF regimen in non-metastatic ASCC. Compared with the standard MF regimen, XP combined with IMRT showed higher treatment completion and lower toxicities. It could be considered a feasible alternative for patients with non-metastatic ASCC.
Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated , Humans , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/methods , Cisplatin , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Mitomycin/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Chemoradiotherapy/adverse effects , Chemoradiotherapy/methods , Anus Neoplasms/drug therapyABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Abstract Objective Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has become the standard of care for patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) with tumors > 1 cm or positive axillary nodes. Pathologic complete response (pCR) has been used as an endpoint to select patients for treatment scaling. This study aimed to examine the benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients who did not achieve pCR after standard NACT in a real-world scenario. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all patients with TNBC who underwent NACT between 2010 and 2020. Clinicopathological data were obtained from the patient records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted at the 5 years follow-up period. Results We included 153 patients, more than half of whom had stage III (58.2%) and high-grade tumors (60.8%). The overall pCR rate was 34.6%, and 41% of the patients with residual disease received adjuvant capecitabine. Disease-specific survival (DSS) among the patients who achieved pCR was significantly higher (p<0.0001). Residual disease after NACT was associated with detrimental effects on DSS. In this cohort, we did not observe any survival benefit of adding adjuvant capecitabine for patients with TNBC subjected to NACT who did not achieve pCR (p=0.52). Conclusion Our study failed to demonstrate a survival benefit of extended capecitabine therapy in patients with TNBC with residual disease after NACT. More studies are warranted to better understand the indication of systemic treatment escalation in this scenario.
ABSTRACT
Background: The standard neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer involves fluoropyrimidines and radiotherapy and, most recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). A drug-drug interaction between fluoropyrimidines and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) was suggested, with a negative impact on oncological outcomes in breast, colon and gastric cancers. Little is known about such an effect on rectal tumours. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PPI utilisation on the pathological response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Materials and methods: Retrospective multicentre study of rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine (cohort 1) or 5-fluororuracil (5-FU) (cohort 2); TNT with oxaliplatin-based regimens was allowed. The pathological response was considered a complete (ypCR) or complete + partial (ypCR + ypPR) according to American Joint Committee on Cancer. PPI use was considered at any time during the neoadjuvant period if concomitant to fluoropyrimidines. Results: From January 2007 to November 2020, 251 patients received capecitabine and 196 5-FU. The rates of PPI use in cohorts 1 and 2 were 20.3% and 26.5%, respectively. TNT was offered to 18.3% in cohort 1. PPI use did not influence ypCR in cohort 1 (yes versus no: 29.4% versus 19.5%; p = 0.13) or 2 (yes versus no: 25.0% versus 26.4%; p = 1.0). Similar ypCR + ypPR were observed in both cohorts 1 (76.5% versus 72.0%; p = 0.60) and 2 (86.5% versus 76.4%; p = 0.16). PPI use was not associated with pathological response in multivariable analysis. PPI users experienced more grade 3 or higher diarrhoea and infections. Conclusion: PPI concomitant to capecitabine/5-FU chemoradiation did not influence the pathological response in rectal cancer but was associated with more treatment-related adverse events.
ABSTRACT
(1) Background: recent evidence suggests that long low-dose capecitabine regimens have a synergistic effect with endocrine therapy as aromatase inhibitors (AIs), and might increase overall survival for hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer compared to both treatments. We performed a retrospective study to confirm the efficacy and expand the safety data for capecitabine plus AI (a combination henceforth named XELIA) for this indication. (2) We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of 163 hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients who received either the XELIA regimen, capecitabine, or an aromatase inhibitor (AI) as single agents in first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, best objective response, and toxicity incidence. (3) Results: the median progression-free survival for patients receiving XELIA, AI, and capecitabine was 29.37 months (20.91 to 37.84; 95% CI), 20.04 months (7.29 to 32.80; 95% CI) and 10.48 (8.69 to 12.28; 95% CI), respectively. The overall response rate was higher in the XELIA group (29.5%) than in the AI (14.3%) and capecitabine (9.1%) groups. However, the differences in overall survival were not statistically significant. Apart from hand-foot syndrome, there were no statistically significant differences in adverse events between the groups. (4) Conclusions: this retrospective study suggests that progression-free survival and overall response rates improved with the XELIA regimen compared to use of aromatase inhibitors and capecitabine alone. Combined use demonstrated an adequate safety profile and might represent an advantageous treatment in places where CDK 4/6 is not available. Larger studies and randomized clinical trials are required to confirm the effects shown in our study.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Aromatase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsABSTRACT
Abstract Background Capecitabine (Xeloda®) is a cytotoxic, antimetabolite chemotherapeutic agent. Its most common adverse events are diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), hyperbilirubinemia, hyperpigmentation, fatigue, abdominal pain, and other gastrointestinal effects. HFS or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is an adverse reaction resulting from therapy with chemotherapeutic agents, classified into three degrees. Hyperpigmentation, as an adverse effect of capecitabine, can occur in different locations and with different patterns. The skin, nails and oral mucosal membrane can be affected. Objective The objective of this study was to report and discuss oral hyperpigmentation associated with HFS caused by the use of capecitabine, which is still poorly described in the literature. Methodology A literature review was carried out using the online databases PubMed, Scielo, BVS, Lilacs, Medline, BBO and Google Scholar, associating the descriptors "Capecitabine", "Pigmentation Disorders", "Oral mucosa", "Cancer" and "Hand-Foot Syndrome", which were related and used to exemplify, discuss and report the exposed clinical case. Results This case report corroborates the literature regarding the incidence in females and black skin persons like this patient who was affected by HFS when undergoing antineoplastic therapy with capecitabine and presented hyperpigmentation of the hands, feet and oral mucosa. On the oral mucosa, the hyperpigmented spots were diffuse, showing a blackish color and irregular edges. Their pathophysiology remains unknown. Study limitations Few articles citing capecitabine-associated pigmentation. Conclusions It is hoped that this study may contribute to the identification and correct diagnosis of hyperpigmentation in the oral cavity, as well as call attention to the adverse effects related to capecitabine.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Capecitabine (Xeloda®) is a cytotoxic, antimetabolite chemotherapeutic agent. Its most common adverse events are diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome (HFS), hyperbilirubinemia, hyperpigmentation, fatigue, abdominal pain, and other gastrointestinal effects. HFS or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (PPE) is an adverse reaction resulting from therapy with chemotherapeutic agents, classified into three degrees. Hyperpigmentation, as an adverse effect of capecitabine, can occur in different locations and with different patterns. The skin, nails and oral mucosal membrane can be affected. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to report and discuss oral hyperpigmentation associated with HFS caused by the use of capecitabine, which is still poorly described in the literature. METHODOLOGY: A literature review was carried out using the online databases PubMed, Scielo, BVS, Lilacs, Medline, BBO and Google Scholar, associating the descriptors "Capecitabine", "Pigmentation Disorders", "Oral mucosa", "Cancer" and "Hand-Foot Syndrome", which were related and used to exemplify, discuss and report the exposed clinical case. RESULTS: This case report corroborates the literature regarding the incidence in females and black skin persons like this patient who was affected by HFS when undergoing antineoplastic therapy with capecitabine and presented hyperpigmentation of the hands, feet and oral mucosa. On the oral mucosa, the hyperpigmented spots were diffuse, showing a blackish color and irregular edges. Their pathophysiology remains unknown. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Few articles citing capecitabine-associated pigmentation. CONCLUSIONS: It is hoped that this study may contribute to the identification and correct diagnosis of hyperpigmentation in the oral cavity, as well as call attention to the adverse effects related to capecitabine.
Subject(s)
Fluorouracil , Hyperpigmentation , Female , Humans , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/adverse effects , Deoxycytidine/adverse effects , Hyperpigmentation/chemically induced , Hyperpigmentation/drug therapyABSTRACT
Purpose: Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are a significant burden in breast cancer (BC). Capecitabine is a frequent choice in this scenario, but data supporting its single-agent activity are scarce. We aimed to evaluate the intracranial efficacy of capecitabine in CNS metastases from BC. Methods: This retrospective cohort included patients with CNS metastases from BC treated with capecitabine at a single centre. Study endpoints were intracranial CNS objective response rate (CNS-ORR), intracranial CNS disease control rate (CNS-DCR), intracranial CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: 209 patients were included; 41.6% hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative (HR + HER2-), 33.9% human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+), and 26.4% triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Radiotherapy was performed in 90.4% and CNS surgery in 27.5%. Among patients accessible for intracranial response, 3-month CNS-ORR and CNS-DCR were 41.6% and 81.2%. CNS-ORR was numerically higher among TNBC (61% versus 38% in HR + HER2-BC and 35% in HER2 + BC) (p = 0.194). When considering patients who were not evaluable at 3-month as non-responders, the 3-month CNS-ORR was 19.1% (18.4% in HR + HER2-, 18.3% in HER2+, and 21.6% in TNBC). Nevertheless, TNBC was associated with lower CNS-PFS (p < 0.001) and OS (p < 0.001). Median PFS was 8.3 months in HR + HER2-, 5.0 months in HER2+, and 3.0 months in TNBC. Median OS was 8.7, 9.1 and 4.5 months, respectively. Conclusion: Among patients with BC and CNS metastases accessible for intracranial response at 3 months, intracranial activity was observed with capecitabine. These patients have a poor prognosis regardless of the BC subtype, especially in scenarios where newer therapeutic options are unavailable.
ABSTRACT
Hand-foot syndrome (HFS), or palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia, is characterised by erythema, oedema and dysesthesia, which can progress to blistering and ulceration. This condition is described as a common adverse effect of the chemotherapeutic agent capecitabine. The study set out to evaluate real-world incidences; assess severity based on clinical criteria, such as local symptoms, dyschromia, erythema, oedema and ulcerations; and associated factors, such as type of solid tumour, chemotherapy regimen, number of cycles, sex, age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Scale of HFS, related to the use of capecitabine. This is a single-centre prospective cohort study carried out jointly by the departments of clinical oncology and dermatology of a university hospital in the southeast of Brazil. The study showed a 34% incidence of HFS, with most cases classified as mild. There was statistical significance in the correlation of the syndrome with sex and performance scores. HFS is the most common and limiting adverse reaction to capecitabine, and causes significant functional and quality impairments in patients with cancer. With this study, we have reinforced the importance of multidisciplinary assessment for early diagnosis and adequate follow-up.
ABSTRACT
Resumen Los grandes avances terapéuticos de las últimas décadas han prolongado la sobrevida de muchos pacientes con cáncer. Sin embargo, esta mejoría se ha logrado a expensas de un aumento en las complicaciones cardiovasculares secundarias a la quimioterapia y a la radioterapia. Se presenta el caso de un paciente con cáncer esofágico que manifiesta angina inestable como complicación de su enfermedad coronaria multivaso tras iniciar la quimioterapia (capecitabina/oxaliplatino/epirubicina), se discuten los posibles mecanismos que subyacen al evento y se subraya la necesidad de individualizar la estratificación de riesgo previa a la quimioterapia.
Abstract The great therapeutic advances of the last decades have prolonged the survival of many cancer patients. However, these advances have been made at the expense of an increase in cardiovascular complications secondary to chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. It is presented a patient with oesophageal cancer who manifests unstable angina as a complication of multivessel coronary artery disease after starting chemotherapy with capecitabine/oxaliplatin/epirubicin, discussing the possible mechanisms underlying the event and emphasizing the need to personalize the risk stratification before chemotherapy.
ABSTRACT
Abstract Hand-foot syndrome (HFS) is a common adverse effect of anticancer therapy. It is known to cause dermatological symptoms including acral erythema and dysesthesia of the palms and soles of the feet, swelling, pain, itching, and scaling. Some drugs, like capecitabine, are known to trigger this condition. However, pigmentation of the oral mucosa is a rare adverse effect. This study aims to report a case of oral mucosa hyperpigmentation caused by capecitabine therapy before the clinical diagnosis of HFS. A 58-year-old female, diagnosed with invasive breast duct carcinoma, had the central nervous system, liver, skin, and lung metastasis, using capecitabine every day for 14 cycles. Oral examination revealed multifocal black macules on the hard palate, bilateral buccal mucosa, gingival mucosa, and dorsum of the tongue. The clinical hypothesis was oral mucosa hyperpigmentation by capecitabine use and only periodic follow-up was necessary. Hyperpigmentation of oral mucosa by capecitabine is a rare consequence of neoplastic therapy and your association with HFS is unclear, and poorly reported. The report of these events is important to alert oncology health teams about the individual tolerance to capecitabine therapy.
Resumo A síndrome mão-pé (SMP) é um efeito adverso comum da terapia anticâncer. Sabe-se que causa sintomas dermatológicos, incluindo eritema acral e disestesia das palmas das mãos e solas dos pés, inchaço, dor, coceira e descamação. Alguns medicamentos como a capecitabina são conhecidos por desencadear essa condição. No entanto, a pigmentação da mucosa oral é um efeito adverso raro. Este trabalho tem como objetivo relatar um caso de hiperpigmentação da mucosa oral causada pela terapia com capecitabina antes do diagnóstico clínico de SMP. Mulher de 58 anos, com diagnóstico de carcinoma invasivo de ducto mamário, apresentou metástase no sistema nervoso central, fígado, pele e pulmão, em uso de capecitabina todos os dias por 14 ciclos. O exame oral revelou máculas negras multifocais no palato duro, mucosa bucal bilateral, mucosa gengival e dorso de língua. A hipótese clínica foi de hiperpigmentação da mucosa oral pelo uso de capecitabina e apenas o acompanhamento periódico foi necessário. A hiperpigmentação da mucosa oral pela capecitabina é uma consequência rara da terapia neoplásica e sua associação com SMP não é clara e pouco relatada. O relato desses eventos é importante para alertar as equipes de saúde oncológica sobre a tolerância individual à terapia com capecitabina.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Capecitabine is an oral anticancer drug which can cause some adverse reactions and the great challenge for its use is to ensure the medication adherence. The aim of this study was to analyze adverse reactions and adherence to capecitabine in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: A prospective study was performed in a tertiary teaching hospital in Brazil. Outpatients undergoing capecitabine treatment for colorectal or gastric cancer were followed for three cycles of treatment. Patient demographic and clinical characteristics data were collected. Adverse reactions were analyzed using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.4. Adherence to capecitabine were evaluated using Morisky-Green and MedTake tests. Statistical analysis was conducted using Chi-square, Fisher's exact and McNemer tests. RESULTS: One hundred and four patients were enrolled in this study, with a mean age was 58.5 ± 10.9 years; 51.0% were men and 51.0% Caucasian. Nausea and diarrhea were the most frequently reported adverse reactions (82.7% and 62.5%, respectively), followed by vomiting (54.8%), fatigue (54.8%), and hand-foot syndrome (53.9%). Nausea and diarrhea were also the most severe adverse reactions. Most patients were adherent to capecitabine in all cycles of treatment using the Morisky-Green test. Adherence increased significantly between cycle 1 and cycle 2 by MedTake test (p < 0.001). Some demographic and clinical characteristics were associated with adverse reactions (e.g., age and nausea, gender and nausea and vomiting) and capecitabine adherence (e.g., marital status and educational level) as well as some adverse reactions were associated with capecitabine adherence (hand-foot syndrome and nausea). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical oncology pharmacists must provide patient information on the correct use of capecitabine, manage adverse reactions, and monitor adherence to treatment. Strategies to prevent non-adherence to capecitabine must be adopted to ensure the success of pharmacotherapy.
Subject(s)
Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Nausea , Aged , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , VomitingABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Adermatoglyphia is defined as the medical condition clinically diagnosed to those who have a congenital or acquired loss of the epidermal ridges on the fingertips, commonly known as fingerprints. Capecitabine, a fluoropyrimidine, is the treatment of choice in a myriad of tumors and has occasionally been reported to cause adermatoglyphia as a secondary effect upon its use. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old female patient, diagnosed with stage IV metastatic left breast cancer with extension to bone in late 2011 reported upon biopsy a hormone receptor positive Her2 negative ductal carcinoma. After initial treatment with a combined radiotherapy and chemotherapy palliative treatment, hepatic and lung metastasis progression obliged capecitabine oral intake. In 2018, after two years on the fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine), the patient reported adermatoglyphia. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: The patient opted to continue taking the medication, since such treatment was working with no other meaningful side effects. Her last work-up studies continue to show complete lung and liver response with stable bone disease. DISCUSSION: Capecitabine is a common drug in the therapy against metastatic breast cancer due to its manageable safety profile. Hand-foot syndrome is a frequent side effect caused by this drug, with dosage adjustment recommended with progression of symptoms. Recent publications have reported adermatoglyphia as a rare side effect of capecitabine use. Upon further examination through dermatoscopy and biopsy, the patient was evidenced to have lost the epidermal ridges that form fingerprints. A score of 9 on the Naranjo scale confirmed to be a consequence of the administration of capecitabine.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Hand-Foot Syndrome , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Capecitabine/adverse effects , Female , Fluorouracil/adverse effects , Hand-Foot Syndrome/etiology , Humans , Middle Aged , Receptor, ErbB-2ABSTRACT
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and oral fluoropyrimidines, such as capecitabine, are widely used in the treatment of cancer, especially gastrointestinal tumors and breast cancer, but their administration can produce serious and even lethal toxicity. This toxicity is often related to the partial or complete deficiency of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme, which causes a reduction in clearance and a longer half-life of 5-FU. It is advisable to determine if a DPD deficiency exists before administering these drugs by genotyping DPYD gene polymorphisms. The objective of this consensus of experts, in which representatives from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology participated, is to establish clear recommendations for the implementation of genotype and/or phenotype testing for DPD deficiency in patients who are candidates to receive fluoropyrimidines. The genotyping of DPYD previous to treatment classifies individuals as normal, intermediate, or poor metabolizers. Normal metabolizers do not require changes in the initial dose, intermediate metabolizers should start treatment with fluoropyrimidines at doses reduced to 50%, and poor metabolizers are contraindicated for fluoropyrimidines.
Subject(s)
Capecitabine/therapeutic use , Dihydrouracil Dehydrogenase (NADP)/genetics , Fluorouracil/therapeutic use , Genotyping Techniques/standards , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/genetics , Patient Selection , Humans , Polymorphism, Single NucleotideABSTRACT
Abstract The objective of the study was to develop an easy, cheap, effective, and safe, small-scale method for sample preparation suitable for the simultaneous high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-ultraviolet (UV) assay of capecitabine and its 5′-deoxy-5-fluorocytidine (5′-DFCR) metabolite in mouse blood plasma. The suitability of the proposed method of sample preparation was verified by the optimal effectiveness and efficiency achieved in the overall analytical workflow. The chromatographic separation of capecitabine and its first metabolite was performed on a Hypersil GOLD aQ column with a mobile phase consisting of 1% formic acid, methanol, and water, and run in a gradient elution mode. The absence of interfering endogenous components at the retention times of each analyte was confirmed by the chromatographic analysis of blank matrices and matrices spiked with the corresponding standards. The absence of any tactile matrix effect was also recorded. For the first time, the effect of the vacutainer's anticoagulant on the extraction efficiency of both analytes was evaluated. The method was found to be accurate, precise, and specific. The estimated mean "extraction" efficiencies were ≥90% for each analyte. The lower limit of quantitation for both capecitabine and 5′-DFCR was 0.05 μg/mL.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Probiotics are used to manage a number of gastrointestinal disorders due to their beneficial properties. Clinical reports showed that probiotics also improve the life quality of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) subjected to oncologic treatment. In a CRC animal model, probiotics supplementation has the potential to decrease the formation of aberrant crypts and ameliorate tumor malignancy, enhancing the antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. Based on these data, we hypothesize that the administration of probiotics impact positively in the overall survival and life quality of rats with CRC under the treatment of capecitabine, which is the pro drug of 5-FU. AIM: To evaluate the probiotics effects in a rat CRC model treated with capecitabine and followed until the end of life. METHODS: 1,2-Dimethylhidrazine dihydrochloride (1,2-DMH) was employed as carcinogen inductor of CRC. Fifty male Wistar-Lewis rats were randomly assigned to one of five following groups: Control (n = 5), Control + probiotics (Control-P group, n = 5), 1,2-DMH alone (DMH group, n = 10), 1,2-DMH + capecitabine (DMH-C group, n = 10), 1,2-DMH + probiotics (DMH-P group, n = 10) and 1,2-DMH + capecitabine + probiotics (DMH-C-P group, n = 10). All parametric data were expressed as the mean ± SD. The statistical significance of differences was analyzed using one-way ANOVA. Data were analyzed with InfoStat software. The results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. Overall survival was evaluated with the Kaplan-Meier estimator with the log-rank test. RESULTS: The data of mean overall survival for DMH, DMH-P, DMH-C, DMH-C-P, Control and Control-P groups were 250 d [95% confidence interval (CI): 242.5-253.1], 268 d (95%CI: 246.3-271.4), 380 d (95%CI: 337.8-421.9), 480 d (95%CI: 436.9-530.7), 588 d (95%CI: 565.8-609.3) and 590 d (95%CI: 564.3-612.9), respectively, with a significant difference between DMH-C and DMH-C-P groups (P = 0.001). Comparing all groups by Kaplan-Meier estimator, we found a significantly different in the overall survival of DMH and DMH-P groups respect to DMH-C (P = 0.001) and DMH-C-P (P = 0.001) groups; interestingly, there were no meaningful differences between Control, Control-P and DMH-C-P groups (P = 0.012). The tendency of change in body weight gain of the rats at 90 d of finishing DMH administration was similar in Control group compared with DMH-C and DMH-C-P groups; however, and of relevance, DMH-C-P group has experienced a higher body weight gain at the end of animal's life than DMH-C group (P = 0.001). In DMH-C-P group we found a positive effect of probiotics in clinical manifestations since diarrhea, constipation and blood stool were absenting. Also, the tumor burden was lower in DMH-C-P than DMH-C, DMH-P or DMH groups (1.25 vs 1.81 vs 3.9 vs 4.8 cm2, respectively). DMH-C and DMH-C-P groups showed only mucinous carcinoma type while in other DMH groups the tumor types were variable. However, mucinous carcinoma from DMH-C-P group showed invasion until muscularis propria layer. Interestingly, metastatic lymph node was observed in DMH, DMH-C and DMH-P groups but not in DMH-C-P. All animals in Control group died from natural causes without objective injuries. All animals of DMH and DMH-P groups died from tumor complications (i.e., obstruction or intestinal perforation); however, this cause was seen only in 44.5% of DMH-C and DMH-C-P groups. CONCLUSION: Probiotics administration improves life quality of rats with CRC under capecitabine treatment and also has a positive effect in the overall survival of these animals treated with this drug.
ABSTRACT
[This corrects the article on p. 1 in vol. 15.].
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There are no head-to-head comparisons evaluating the efficacy of the main polychemotherapy regimens used for patients with pancreatic cancer in the adjuvant setting. We aimed to describe the relative efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX), gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEM-CAP) and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GEM-NAB) in this setting using a Bayesian network approach. METHODS: We collected data from the ESPAC-4, PRODIGE 24 and APACT trials. Disease-free survival (DFS), according to the investigators, and overall survival (OS) for the three polychemotherapy regimens were compared using gemcitabine as the reference arm. We ran Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations with a fixed-effect model to generate the posterior distribution of the hazard ratios (HRs) using non-informative priors. Relative efficacy was measured by HRs, surface under cumulative ranking and rankograms. RESULTS: mFOLFIRINOX was the chemotherapy regimen most likely to be the most effective in the adjuvant setting (98.9% and 89.6% probability for DFS and OS, respectively). GEM-NAB marginally improved DFS (HR = 0.97, 95% credible interval (95% CrI) = 0.77-1.21) and OS (HR = 0.98, 95% CrI = 0.76-1.25) when compared to GEM-CAP. However, GEM-NAB had the highest chances of being the second most active chemotherapy regimen (61.4% and 52.5% probability for DFS and OS, respectively), whereas GEM-CAP was less likely to represent the second most active regimen (37.7% and 40.1% probability for DFS and OS, respectively). CONCLUSION: For patients eligible and fit enough to undergo adjuvant treatment with mFOLFIRINOX, this constitutes the treatment of choice. For those with contraindications to mFOLFIRINOX, while both GEM-NAB and GEM-CAP can be considered appropriate alternatives, GEM-NAB is likely the most effective regimen.
ABSTRACT
Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for breast cancer and its metastasis; however, it affects the patients' quality of life. Previously, it was demonstrated that milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei CRL431 (probiotic fermented milk (PFM)) exerted benefits against breast cancer metastasis by modulating the immune response in a mouse model. The aim of this work was to evaluate PFM administration on the side effects of capecitabine and on its anti-tumour/anti-metastatic effects. In vitro, 4T1 breast cancer cells were treated with capecitabine in the presence of immune cells' conditioned media from mice administered with PFM. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. In vivo, BALB/c mice (healthy, bearing breast cancer or with potential metastasis) were treated or not with capecitabine and administered with PFM. Blood cell counts, intestinal damages, lung histology and serum cytokines were evaluated. Results showed that capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the immune cells from mice that received PFM when the lower dose of capecitabine was evaluated. PFM reduced capecitabine side effects in all the mouse models and decreased intestinal mucositis and mortality. PFM administration to mice under chemotherapy maintained the anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine with similar or decreased values for serum IL-10 and TNF-α and decreased IL-6, a cytokine related to poor prognosis in advanced cancer patients. In addition, PFM by itself reduced metastasis without side effects and improved the host's immune response. PFM has a potential to be administered as an immune adjuvant in patients under chemotherapy without affecting the treatment. KEY POINTS: ⢠Milk fermented by L. casei CRL431 (PFM) diminished capecitabine side effects. ⢠Capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the PFM-stimulated immune cells. ⢠PFM maintained anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine in mouse models. Graphical abstract.