Self-Efficacy for Symptom Management in Long-Term Adult Hematopoietic Stem Cell Survivors.

Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) survivors have a complex and multiphase recovery period. Health care delivery and psychosocial interventions for HCT survivors are challenging because many HCT recipients live great distances from the facility where they had their HCT. Therefore identifying factors associated with a patient's capability to self-manage symptoms is a significant focus of survivorship research. A patient's self-efficacy may be important for the successful management of major stressors associated with treatments and recovery. Here, we aimed to evaluate the impact of perceived self-efficacy on distress, quality of life (QoL), depression, and fatigue and identify the factors associated with lower self-efficacy. This cross-sectional study analyzed baseline data from a randomized controlled trial INSPIRE (NCT01602211) in adult (age 18 and older) survivors 2 to 10 years after HCT. Patients with recurrence or subsequent malignancy requiring cancer treatment during the 2 years before enrollment, inability to read and understand English, and lack of access to email and the Internet were excluded. Data included medical records and patient-reported outcomes including Cancer and Treatment Distress (CTXD) with 6 subscales, Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8), Short Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12) physical function and mental function scores, Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and Self-Efficacy. Pearson correlations were used to test bivariate associations for self-efficacy of CTXD, SF-12, BFI, and PHQ-8. General linear models were used to test the independent associations for CTXD and SF-12 outcomes with self-efficacy, controlling for selected sociodemographic and treatment covariates. Tenability of statistical model assumptions were examined, and no remediation was necessary. A total of 1078 HCT survivors were included in the analysis. Participants were 19 to 85 years (mean age 58), 53% male, and over 90% White and non-Hispanic. Only 16% reported living in a rural area. A majority received an autologous HCT (55%) and were less than 5 years from their first HCT (54%). Among the allogeneic HCT recipients, more than half (55%) had active chronic Graft-versus-Host (cGVHD) and nearly 40% were on active systemic treatment. The mean self-efficacy score was 3.01 (SD = 0.49). Female sex (P = .014), younger age at HCT, younger age at cGVHD presentation (P = .031), moderate to severe currently active cGVHD (P = .003) and household income less than $40,000 (P< .001) were associated with lower self-efficacy. In bivariate analyses, self-efficacy was negatively correlated with mean total distress (CTXD, r = -.5, P< .001) and each of the CTXD subscales. HCT survivors with higher self-efficacy also reported better physical (r 0.48, P< .001) and mental function on the SF-12 (r = 0.57, P< .001). Moreover, self-efficacy was negatively correlated with symptoms such as fatigue (r = -.44, P< .001) and depression (r = -.48, P< .001). In a regression model investigating the impact of self-efficacy on CTXD controlled for demographics and disease characteristics, lower self-efficacy was independently associated with higher distress (CTXD, ß = -.232; 95% CI [-.294, -.169], P< .001). Moreover, there was a significant positive relationship between self-efficacy and both mental (ß = 4.68; 95% CI [3.82, 5.54]; P< .001) and physical (ß = 2.69; 95% CI [1.74, 3.64]; P< .001) components of QoL. Our study demonstrates that lower levels of self-efficacy reported by HCT survivors were independently associated with higher levels of symptoms such as fatigue and depression, lower QoL, and more cancer-related distress. Furthermore, self-efficacy was more likely to be impaired in females, younger adults, those with lower incomes, and survivors with active cGVHD. These findings support the value of self-management interventions focused on improving self-efficacy as having the potential to improve multiple symptoms and QoL in HCT survivors.

Who Enrolls in an Online Cancer Survivorship Program? Reach of the INSPIRE Randomized Controlled Trial for Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation Survivors.

The internet can be a valuable tool in delivering survivorship care to hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) cancer survivors. We describe the reach of INSPIRE, an Internet and social media-based randomized controlled trial, to address healthcare and psychosocial needs of HCT survivors. All survivors 2-10 years after HCT for hematologic malignancy or myelodysplasia from 6 transplantation centers in the US were approached by mail and follow-up calls. Eligible participants had access to the Internet, an email address, and did not have active disease in the past 2 years. We used logistic regression to determine characteristics of eligible survivors who were more or less likely to enroll. Of 2578 eligible HCT survivors, 1065 (41%) enrolled in the study. The mean age of enrollees was 56.3 ± 12.6 years (range, 19 to 89 years), 52% were male, and 94% were white. Survivors less likely to enroll included those who were male, age <40 years, and who received an autologous transplant (all P < .001). Compared with white survivors, African Americans were less likely to enroll (P < .001), whereas Native Americans/Alaska Natives were more likely to join the study (P = .03). The reach of the INSPIRE program was broad, including to survivors who traditionally have less access to resources, such as Native Americans/Alaskan Natives and rural residents. Strategies are still needed to improve the enrollment of online studies of survivorship resources for males, young adults, African American, and autologous HCT survivors because their use may improve outcomes.