ABSTRACT
This patient, now in her 40s, was evaluated because of genital ambiguity and diagnosed with pAIS in infancy based upon elevated testosterone and gonadotropin levels and significantly reduced binding affinity of the androgen receptor. Such reduced binding is consistent with a structural abnormality of the receptor protein precluding expected activity of the androgen receptor. Based on this information and counseling, her parents chose a female sex assignment. She had clitoral recession and testes removal as an infant and neovaginal surgery using a distal ileum segment at age 11 years and was begun on estrogen therapy at age 12 years. She is being reported now to point out that the data known at her birth provided as specific information to guide sex assignment and genital surgery as is currently available. More importantly, long-term outcome data is very positive showing clear female gender identity, successful marriage of more than 20 years, excellent social relationships including family and friends, an active social life. Since this diagnosis is lifelong, it is inevitable that there will be reminders, hopefully rare, that may be traumatizing. Unfortunately, in this patient, such reminders have been related to access to health care.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Although it was common in the 1970s-1990s to assign female gender of rearing to 46,XY infants with limited virilization of varying etiologies, including those with partial androgen insensitivity syndrome (PAIS), long-term data on outcomes for these individuals are sparse. Therefore, our goal was to use the power of an international registry to evaluate clinical features, surgical management, and pubertal data in patients with a molecularly confirmed diagnosis of PAIS who were born before 2008 and were raised as girls. METHODS: The current study interrogated the International Disorders of Sex Development Registry for available data on management and pubertal outcomes in individuals with genetically confirmed PAIS who were raised as girls. RESULTS: Among the 11 individuals who fulfilled the key criteria for inclusion, the external masculinization score (EMS) at presentation ranged from 2 to 6 (median 5); 7 girls underwent gonadectomy before the age of 9 years, whereas 4 underwent gonadectomy in the teenage years (≥ age 13). Clitoral enlargement at puberty was reported for 3 girls (27%) who presented initially at the time of puberty with intact gonads. In the 9 individuals (82%) for whom gonadal pathology data were provided, there was no evidence of germ cell tumor at median age of 8.1 years. All girls received estrogen replacement, and 8/11 had attained Tanner stage 4-5 breast development at the last assessment. CONCLUSION: In general, although it appears that female assignment in PAIS is becoming uncommon, our data provide no evidence to support the practice of prophylactic prepubertal gonadectomy with respect to the risk of a germ cell tumor.