Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of first- and second-line immunotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Background: A multitude of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted in both the initial and subsequent treatment settings for patients diagnosed with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have provided clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of immunotherapy with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In light of these findings, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has authorized the use of several ICIs in specific subpopulations of mCRC patients. Nevertheless, there remains a dearth of direct comparative RCTs evaluating various treatment options. Consequently, the most effective ICI therapeutic strategy for microsatellite-stable (MSS) subgroup and microsatellite instability (MSI) subgroup in the first- and second-line therapies remains undefined. To address this gap, the present study employs a Bayesian network meta-analysis to ascertain the most effective first- and second-line ICI therapeutic strategies. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, with the retrieval date ranging from the databases' inception to August 20, 2024. A total of 875 studies were identified, and seven were ultimately included in the analysis after a screening process. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted on the basis of the search results. Results: This comprehensive analysis, comprising seven RCTs, evaluated first-line and second-line immunotherapy regimens in 1,358 patients diagnosed with mCRC. The treatments under investigation consisted of five initial treatments, including three focusing on MSS patients and two on MSI patients, as well as two secondary immunotherapy regimens, both focusing on MSS patients. A total of 1051 individuals underwent first-line treatment, while 307 received second-line treatment. The application of ICIs proved to offer varying degrees clinical benefits when compared to standard-of-care therapy alone, both in two subgroups of the first and the second treatment phases. Of particular note is the performance of Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab, which demonstrated superior efficacy in improving progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.13-0.34),. Moreover, the treatment demonstrated an optimal safety profile, with a relatively low risk of adverse events (OR = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.56), compared to other first-line treatment modalities for MSI subgroup. Regarding MSS subgroup, the improvement of PFS by Nivolumab plus standard-of-care (SOC) was relatively significant (HR = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02). In the realm of second-line therapies for MSS subgroup, the administration of Atezolizumab plus SOC has proven to be an effective approach for prolonging PFS, exhibiting an HR of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.44-0.99). These findings underscore the clinical benefits and safety profiles of ICIs in the treatment of mCRC across various treatment lines. Conclusions: The clinical application of ICIs in both first- and second-line treatment strategies for patients with mCRC yields substantial therapeutic benefits. A detailed assessment in this study indicates that first-line treatment with Nivolumab combination with ipilimumab may represent an efficacious and well-tolerated therapeutic approach for MSI subgroup. In terms of MSS subgroup in first-line therapy, Nivolumab plus SOC may be a relative superior choice. In the context of second-line therapy for MSS subgroup, it is evident that a combination of Atezolizumab and SOC represents a preferable option for enhancing PFS. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that other ICIs treatment regimens also exhibit great value in various aspects, with the potential to inform the development of future clinical treatment guidelines and provide a stronger rationale for the selection of ICIs in both first- and second-line therapeutic strategies for mCRC. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#recordDetails, identifier CRD42024543400.

Extracorporeal photopheresis vs. systemic immunosuppression for immune-related adverse events: Interim analysis of a prospective two-arm study.

BACKGROUND: Checkpoint inhibitor-induced steroid-refractory (sr) and steroid-dependent (sd) immune-related adverse events (irAE) account for about 11 % of irAE. Although these patients face worse outcomes due to irAE mortality and/or sustained immunosuppression, which impairs anti-tumor response, there is no established second-line treatment based on prospective trial data. METHODS: This prospective comparative study investigates outcomes of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulating therapy, versus second-line immunosuppressants (SLI) in sr/sd-irAE. The primary endpoint was longitudinal change in immunophenotype; secondary endpoints were outcome of irAE and tumor response. Patient demographics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30; global health status (GHS/QoL)) and longitudinal blood samples were analyzed at baseline; in weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. RESULTS: At interim analysis, 21 patients (11 ECP, 10 SLI) with 7 different sr/sd-irAE were included. Compared with the SLI group, the ECP group demonstrated a higher clinical response rate of irAE (93 % vs. 80 %; 95 % CI 0.83-1.92; P = 0.54) and a better GHS/QoL score throughout all follow-up visits. ECP patients showed a numerically higher overall survival (23 vs. 12 months; 95 % CI 0.02-3.02; P = 0.27) and lower cancer progression rates (33 % vs. 67 %; 95 % CI 0.09-1.60; P = 0.52). Immunophenotyping revealed changes in immune cell populations and the regulation of immune checkpoints. There were no significant safety issues in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: This prospective comparative study supports the clinical efficacy of ECP in the treatment of sr/sd-irAE in comparison to the SLI cohort. Thus, ECP represents a potential treatment option for this indication, given its good safety profile while maintaining anti-tumor response. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05700565, https://classic. CLINICALTRIALS: gov/ct2/show/NCT05700565.

Irinotecan plus raltitrexed as second-line treatment in locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a prospective open-label, single-arm, multi-center, phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death. There are limited therapeutic options for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancers which fail first-line chemotherapy. Phase I/II studies showed that the combined application of the raltitrexed and irinotecan has significant synergistic effect and acceptable toxicity. However, most of these previous studies have relatively small sample size. METHODS: This is a prospective open-label, single-arm, multi-center, Phase II trial. Brief inclusion criteria: patients were aged 18 to 75 years with locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of 5-FU and oxaliplatin therapy. Enrolled patients received raltitrexed (3 mg/m2, d1) and irinotecan (180 mg/m2, d1) each 21-day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, and the secondary endpoints were disease control rate, objective response rate, overall survival and safety. RESULTS: A total of 108 patients were enrolled between September 2016 and May 2020. The median age was 61 years, ECOG 1 score accounts for 67.6%, the rest were ECOG 0. A total of 502 cycles were completed, with an average of 4.6 cycles and a median of 4 cycles. 108 patients were evaluated, with an objective response rate of 17.6%, and disease control rate of 76.9%. The median follow-up time was 27 months (range:3.1-61.0 m) at data cut-off on March 2023. Median progression-free survival was 4.9 months (95% CI 4.1-5.7) and median overall survival was 13.1 months (95% CI 12.2-15.5). The most common adverse events that were elevated are alanine aminotransferase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, fatigue, diarrhoea, neutrocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, hypohemoglobin, and leukocytopenia. Most of the adverse events were Grade I/II, which were relieved after symptomatic treatment, and there were no treatment-related cardiotoxicities and deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of raltitrexed and irinotecan as second-line treatment for mCRC could be a reliable option after failure of standard 5-Fu-first-line chemotherapy in locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancers, especially for patients with 5-FU intolerance (cardiac events or DPD deficiency patients). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03053167, registration date was 14/2/2017.

An Emulated Target Trial Case Study of Real-World Overall Survival With Second-Line Maintenance Niraparib Versus Active Surveillance in Patients With Recurrent Ovarian Cancer.

PURPOSE: This retrospective real-world study compared overall survival (OS) between patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (OC) who received niraparib second-line maintenance (2LM) versus active surveillance (AS) using target trial emulation, cloning, inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methodology to minimize immortal time bias. METHODS: Eligible patients from a United States-based, deidentified, electronic health record-derived database were diagnosed with epithelial OC (January 1, 2011-May 31, 2021), were BRCAwt, and completed second-line (2L) therapy (January 1, 2017-March 2, 2022). Patient data were cloned at index (2L last treatment date), assigned to niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, and censored when treatment deviated from clone assignment. Follow-up was measured from index to earliest of study end (May 31, 2022), last activity, or death. Median OS (mOS) and hazard ratios were estimated from stabilized IPCW Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients received niraparib 2LM, and 707 had their care managed with AS. Key characteristics were balanced across cohorts after cloning and stabilized IPCW. Median follow-up was 15.6- and 9.3-months pre-cloning. IPCW mOS was 24.1 months (95% CI: 20.9-29.5) and 18.4 months (95% CI: 15.1-22.8) in niraparib 2LM and AS cohorts, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% CI: 0.66-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This real-world study provides supportive evidence of an OS benefit for patients with BRCAwt recurrent OC who received 2LM niraparib monotherapy compared with those whose care was managed with AS. The analytic strategies implemented were useful in minimizing immortal time bias and measured confounding.

Second-line drug-resistant TB and associated risk factors in Karakalpakstan, Uzbekistan.

BACKGROUND: Drug-resistant TB (DR-TB) remains a major public health threat. In 2022, Uzbekistan reported 2,117 cases of DR-TB, with 69% tested for fluoroquinolone resistance. Limited information is available on the prevalence of resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid, and fluoroquinolone, which are key components of the all-oral treatment regimen for rifampicin-resistant TB in Uzbekistan. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted using extensive programmatic data from 2019 to 2023 in Uzbekistan. We assessed second-line drug-resistant TB (SLDR-TB) rates using phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST). Demographic and clinical characteristics associated with SLDR-TB were analysed using multivariable logistic regression models based on the Allen-Cady approach. RESULTS: In total, 2,405 patients with TB who had undergone pDST were included (median age 40 years, 47% female). The overall SLDR-TB resistance rate was 24% (95% CI 22-26). Prevalence of resistance to bedaquiline, linezolid, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and amikacin were respectively 3.1%, 0.8%, 15%, 13%, and 12%. Risk factors for SLDR-TB were resistance to rifampicin and/or isoniazid, exposure to clofazimine, retreatment status, contact with drug-susceptible TB case or DR-TB case, and diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of SLDR-TB is of major concern, emphasising the need for baseline pDST in RR-TB treatment. Identified risk factors can aid early detection of at-risk individuals and inform clinical practice.

CONTEXTE: La TB résistante aux médicaments (DR-TB) reste une menace majeure pour la santé publique. En 2022, l'Ouzbékistan a signalé 2 117 cas de DR-TB, dont 69% ont été testés pour la résistance aux fluoroquinolones. Les informations sur la prévalence de la résistance à la bédaquiline, au linézolide et aux fluoroquinolones, qui sont des composants clés du traitement entièrement oral de la TB résistante à la rifampicine en Ouzbékistan, sont limitées. MÉTHODES: Une étude rétrospective a été menée en utilisant des données programmatiques exhaustives de 2019 à 2023 en Ouzbékistan. Nous avons évalué les taux de TB résistante aux médicaments de deuxième ligne (SLDR-TB, pour l'anglais, « second-line drug-resistant TB ¼) en utilisant des tests de sensibilité phénotypique aux médicaments (pDST). Les caractéristiques démographiques et cliniques associées à la SLDR-TB ont été analysées à l'aide de modèles de régression logistique multivariés basés sur l'approche Allen-Cady. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 2 405 patients atteints de TB ayant subi un pDST ont été inclus (âge médian de 40 ans, 47% de femmes). Le taux global de résistance à la SLDR-TB était de 24% (CI à 95% 22­26). La prévalence de la résistance à la bédaquiline, au linézolide, à la moxifloxacine, à la lévofloxacine et à l'amikacine était respectivement de 3,1%, 0,8%, 15%, 13% et 12%. Les facteurs de risque de SLDR-TB comprenaient la résistance à la rifampicine et/ou à l'isoniazide, l'exposition à la clofazimine, le statut de retraitement, le contact avec un cas de TB sensible aux médicaments ou de DR-TB, et le diabète. CONCLUSIONS: La prévalence élevée de la SLDR-TB est une source de préoccupation majeure, soulignant la nécessité de réaliser des pDST de base dans le traitement de la TB résistante à la rifampicine. Les facteurs de risque identifiés peuvent aider à la détection précoce des individus à risque et à informer la pratique clinique.

Direct-to-catheter ablation versus second line catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: Effect on arrhythmia recurrence, AF burden, early left atrium remodeling and quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Catheter ablation has obtained class 1 indication in ablation of young, healthy patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs) remain first-line therapy before ablating persistent AF (PersAF). We sought to evaluate the efficacy of a direct-to-catheter ablation approach against catheter ablation post AADs in PersAF. METHODS: In this DECAAF II subanalysis, patients were stratified into two subgroups: 'Direct-to-catheter' group comprising patients who had not received AADs prior to ablation, and'second-line ablation' group, comprising patients who had been on any AAD therapy at any time before ablation. Patients were followed over 18 months. The primary outcome was AF recurrence. Secondary outcomes included AF burden, quality of life (QoL) that assessed by the AFSS and SF-36 scores, and changes in the left atrial volume index (LAVI) assessed by LGE-MRI scans. RESULTS: The analysis included 815 patients, with 279 classified as'direct-to-catheter' group and 536 classified as'Second-line ablation' group. The primary outcome was similar between both groups (44.8% vs 44.4%, p > 0.05), as was AF burden (20% vs 16%, p > 0.05). Early remodeling, reflected by LAVI reduction, was similar between the groups (9.1 [1.6-18.0] in the second-line ablation group and 9.5 [2.5-19.7] in the direct-to-catheter group, p > 0.05). QoL pre/post ablation was also similar (p > 0.05). On multivariate analysis, history of AAD was not predictive of AF recurrence(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Prior AAD therapy demonstrated minimal impact on atrial remodeling and QoL improvement, in addition to limited benefit on AF recurrence and burden post-ablation in patients with PersAF. Additional studies are warranted to explore the efficacy of catheter ablation as a first-line therapy in PersAF.

Phase Ib/II study on the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as second-line monotherapy for patients with small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of multiple doses of pegylated irinotecan (JK1201I) as a second-line monotherapy for treating small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients. METHODS: According to the "3 + 3" dose-escalation principle, patients received intravenous JK1201I at 180 or 220 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks for four cycles. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze PFS and overall OS. Brookmeyer and Crowley's method was used for mPFS and mOS. RESULTS: This study included 29 patients with stage III-IV SCLC (stage IIIa, n = 1; stage IIIb, n = 1; and stage IV, n = 27). Of these, 26 patients were enrolled in the 180 mg/m2 dose group, and 3 patients were enrolled in the 220 mg/m2 dose group. No dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was noted during the first 28 days of treatment. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were recorded in the 180 mg/m2 group, including diarrhea (11.5%, 3/26), neutropenia (7.7%, 2/26), and leukopenia (7.7%, 2/26). In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient (33.3%, 1/3) experienced neutropenia or leukopenia. In the 180 mg/m2 group, 38.5% (10/26) of patients achieved an objective response rate (ORR), with a disease control rate (DCR) of 73.1% (19/26). The mPFS and mOS were 3.4 and 12.1 months, respectively. In the 220 mg/m2 group, one patient had stable disease, and one had progressive disease (PD). The ORR, DCR, mPFS, and mOS were 0% (0/3) and 33.3% (1/3), 2.7 months and 2.7 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: JK1201I exhibits promising efficacy and relatively low toxicities as a second-line monotherapy for SCLC, warranting further large-scale clinical studies to evaluate its efficacy in greater detail.

Raltitrexed Chemotherapy Regimen Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical studies have shown that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of changing second-line treatment to raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients who have failed the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab. METHODS: This is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study. A total of 100 patients with mCRC after failure of the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab were enrolled from November 2016 to October 2021, and received second-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab. Patients were treated for 6 cycles, and efficacy evaluation over stable disease were followed by maintenance treatment of bevacizumab and raltitrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and toxicity. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were treated with SALIRI (raltitrexed + irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, and six patients with SALOX (raltitrexed + oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab. Median PFS was 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2-11.0) months, including 8.2 (95% CI 6.2, 11.0) months in the SALIRI group and 11.6 (95% CI 3.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. Median OS was 17.6 (95% CI 15.2, 22.0) months in the SALIRI group and 17.1 (95% CI 4.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. ORR and DCR were 25.5% and 87.2% in the SALIRI group, and 33.3% and 83.3% in the SALOX group, respectively. A low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab improved survival duration in mCRC patients with failed first-line therapy. Therefore, treatment with raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab could be a superior therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in mCRC (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03126071).

Incidence and predictors of virological failure among HIV infected children and adolescents receiving second-line antiretroviral therapy in Uganda, a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: In Uganda, 20% (19,073/94,579) of children and adolescents (0-19 years) living with HIV (CALHIV) were receiving second-line antiretroviral therapy (ART) by the end of March 2020. Data on incidence and predictors of virological failure among these CALHIV on second-line ART is limited. Lack of this information and limited access to HIV drug resistance testing prevents early identification of CALHIV at risk of virological failure on second-line ART. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and predictors of virological failure among CALHIV on second-line ART in Uganda. METHODOLOGY: This was a retrospective cohort study of all CALHIV aged 0-19 years who were switched to second-line ART regimen between June 2010 and June 2019 at the Baylor Uganda Centre of Excellence clinic. Data was analysed using STATA 14. Cumulative incidence curves were used to assess incidence of virological failure. Factors associated with virological failure were identified using sub-distributional hazard regression analysis for competing risks considering death, transfer out and loss to follow-up as competing risks. RESULTS: Of 1104 CALHIV, 53% were male. At switch to Protease Inhibitor (PI) based second-line ART, majority (47.7%) were aged 5 - 9 years,56.2% had no/mild immune suppression for age while 77% had viral load copies < 100,000 copies/mL. The incidence of virological failure on second-line ART regimen among CALHIV was 3.9 per 100 person-years (PY) with a 10-year cumulative incidence rate of 32%. Factors significantly associated with virological failure were age 10 - 19 years (HR 3.2, 95% 1.6 - 6.2, p < 0.01) and HIV viral load count > 100,000 copies/mL (HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.5 - 3.1), p < 0.01) prior to second-line ART switch. CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes for children and adolescents on second-line ART are favourable with one third of them developing virological failure at 10 years of follow up. Adolescent age group and high HIV viral load at the start of second-line ART were significantly associated with virological failure on second-line ART. There is need to determine optimal strategies to improve ART treatment outcomes among adolescents with high viral load counts at second-line ART switch.

Sequencing of systemic therapy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

PURPOSE: For patients with advanced or unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), safe and effective therapies are urgently needed to improve their long-term prognosis. Although the guidelines recommend first-line treatments such as sorafenib, lenvatinib, and atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab (T+A) and second-line treatments such as regorafenib, the efficacy comparison between drugs is lacking, that is, a treatment is not recommended as the optimal or alternative choice for a specific patient population. Therefore, we will conduct a high-quality network meta-analysis based on Phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to systematically evaluate and compare overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and serious adverse events (SAE) of different treatment protocols in the context of first-line and second-line therapies, which are critical for clinical decision making and prognostic improvement in advanced HCC patients. METHODS: The studies of interest were Phase III RCTs evaluating the efficacy or safety of first- or second-line therapies in patients with unresectable or advanced HCC. Literature published in English from the four databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science was comprehensively searched from the inception to May 23, 2022. Outcomes of interest included OS, PFS, ORR, and SAE. A league table was developed to show the results of the comparison between different treatments. A histogram of cumulative probability was drawn to discuss the ranking probability of treatments based on different outcomes. The effectiveness and safety of various treatments were comprehensively considered and the two-dimensional diagram was plotted to guide clinical practice. The Gemtc package in R Studio was used for network meta-analysis in a Bayesian framework. RESULTS: The results showed that HAIC-FO was superior to T+A regimen, regardless of OS, PFS or ORR. TACE combined with lenvatinib performed better than T+A in PFS, and ORR. In addition to the T+A regimen, Sintilimab combined with IBI305 and camrelizumab combined with apatinib were also associated with longer OS, PFS, and ORR, and their SAE incidence was not higher than that of T+A, especially for camrelizumab combined with apatinib, its safety was better than that of T+A regimen. There were no new treatments or combinations that were more effective than regorafenib. It was important to note that for PFS, the efficacy of apatinib and cabozantinib was not statistically different from that of regorafenib, so these two treatments could be used as alternative treatment options in cases where regorafenib was not tolerated or treatment failed. CONCLUSIONS: We conducted a network meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of multiple treatment modalities by integrating the results of direct and indirect comparisons. This study included high-quality multicenter Phase III RCTs, collated and summarized all treatments involved in advanced or unresectable HCC in first-line and second-line settings, and compared with T+A and regorafenib, respectively, and ranked based on efficacy and safety to support clinical decision making.

Efficacy and safety of second-line therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The selection of appropriate second-line therapy for liver cancer after first-line treatment failure poses a significant clinical challenge due to the lack of direct comparative studies and standard treatment protocols. A network meta-analysis (NMA) provides a robust method to systematically evaluate the clinical outcomes and adverse effects of various second-line treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library to identify phase III/IV randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to March 11, 2024. The outcomes extracted were median overall survival (OS), median progression-free survival (PFS), time to disease progression (TTP), disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse reactions. This study was registered in the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42023427843) to ensure transparency, novelty, and reliability. RESULTS: We included 16 RCTs involving 7,005 patients and 10 second-line treatments. For advanced HCC patients, regorafenib (HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.53-0.73) and cabozantinib (HR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.63-0.85) provided the best OS benefits compared to placebo. Cabozantinib (HR = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.32-0.55) and regorafenib (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31-0.68) also offered the most significant PFS benefits. For TTP, apatinib (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.33-0.57), ramucirumab (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.34-0.57), and regorafenib (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.38-0.51) showed significant benefits over placebo. Regarding ORR, ramucirumab (OR = 9.90, 95% CI: 3.40-42.98) and S-1 (OR = 8.68, 95% CI: 1.4-154.68) showed the most significant increases over placebo. Apatinib (OR = 3.88, 95% CI: 2.48-6.10) and cabozantinib (OR = 3.53, 95% CI: 2.54-4.90) provided the best DCR benefits compared to placebo. Tivantinib showed the most significant advantages in terms of three different safety outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that, in terms of overall efficacy and safety, regorafenib and cabozantinib are the optimal second-line treatment options for patients with advanced HCC.

Second-line pharmacotherapy intensification after metformin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes: a nationwide register study from Finland during 2011-2022.

BACKGROUND: In this nationwide register study, we examined the initiation of a second-line antidiabetic medicine (ADM) among new patients receiving regular metformin monotherapy in Finland during 2011-2022. We also reflected the second-line treatment patterns on changes in the reimbursement policy, and the national type 2 diabetes (T2D) care guidelines. METHODS: Using register data on all reimbursed ADM purchases during 2010-2022, we defined nine annual cohorts of patients initiating regular metformin monotherapy during 2011-2019, each with a three-year follow-up. Descriptive methods were used to study the patterns of metformin monotherapy and second-line intensification over time. Proportional hazards models were used to analyse the take-up of the second-line ADM. RESULTS: The share of new patients initiating metformin use (11-13% of all metformin users) and regular metformin use (83-85% of all new metformin users) remained stable. In all cohorts, 16-19% of the patients took up a second-line ADM (median time to intensification 1.5 years). With the 2011 cohort as reference, the highest proportion of new regular metformin users taking up a second ADM (hazard ratio 1.12. 95% confidence interval 1.07 ; 1.16, P < .0001) was in the 2019 cohort. In the 2017 cohort, the proportion of patients initiating sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as second-line treatment surpassed those initiating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. The reimbursement policy restricted the use of GLP-1-analogues. CONCLUSIONS: Second-line treatment intensification patterns over time paralleled the changes in the reimbursement system. Thus, our findings suggest that the reimbursement policy may influence the use of ADMs in Finland.

Efficacy and safety of PD-1 monoclonal antibody combined with interferon-alpha 1b and anlotinib hydrochloride as the second-line therapy in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors are now used more commonly in combination than monotherapy as the first-line choice in patients with unresectable advanced melanoma. Nevertheless, for cases that progressed after the initial combination therapy, the subsequent regimen option can be very difficult. Herein, we reported the efficacy and safety of a triple combination regimen in Chinese unresectable advanced melanoma patients who had poor responses to the first-line immune therapy. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical profiles of patients diagnosed with stage IIIC-IV melanoma between June 1, 2020, and September 30, 2023. The patients who failed the prior immune therapies and received anti-PD-1 mono antibody plus interferon(IFN)-alpha 1b and anlotinib hydrochloride as the second-line therapy were enrolled in the retrospective analysis. Additionally, we examined the exhaustion of T-cells using mIHC staining in available tumor samples. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients were included in this study. The median follow-up period was 13.6 months. The objective response rate evaluated by the investigators was 9.1%(1CR, 4PR). The disease control rate was 47.3%. The median overall survival was 17.6 months, and the median progression-free survival was 2.8 months. The adverse events rate of any grade was 100%. Grade 3 or 4 irAEs were observed in 29.1% of cases. Multiplex immunohistochemical staining revealed an increased trend of TIM3 expression on tumor-infiltrating T cells in patients without objective response. CONCLUSION: PD-1 monoclonal antibody plus interferon-alpha 1b plus anlotinib showed acceptable tolerability and anticancer benefits in Chinese metastatic melanoma patients as a second-line therapy.

Avelumab as second-line or later treatment in patients with metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma: Analysis of real-world outcomes in France using the CARADERM database linked to the French national healthcare database.

AIM: Avelumab has been approved worldwide for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC), a rare and aggressive skin cancer. This study evaluated outcomes in patients with mMCC in France who received avelumab as second-line or later (2L+) treatment in routine clinical practice. METHODS: This retrospective, noninterventional study evaluated all patients diagnosed with mMCC using two databases: CARADERM (French national database of rare dermatological cancers) and SNDS (national healthcare database), identified via probabilistic linkage. Eligible patients initiated avelumab as 2L+ treatment between August 2016 and December 2019 and were followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) at 24 months. RESULTS: Overall, 180 patients who received 2L+ avelumab were identified (112 from CARADERM, 68 after SNDS linkage). Median age at diagnosis was 74.0 years and 177 (98.3 %) had received chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment. Median follow-up was 13.1 months. Median OS from start of avelumab was 14.6 months (95 % CI, 9.9-21.3) in the overall population, 15.9 months (95 % CI, 8.6-28.3) in CARADERM patients, and 13.3 months (95 % CI, 6.7-19.1) in non-CARADERM patients. OS rates at 12 and 24 months were 53.8 % (95 % CI, 46.2 %-60.8 %) and 40.5 % (95 % CI, 33.2 %-47.6 %), respectively. In evaluable patients (CARADERM database), median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95 % CI, 2.7-7.5) and the objective response rate was 55.3 % (95 % CI, 45.3-65.4), including complete response in 31.9 %. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world outcomes with 2L+ avelumab treatment for mMCC are consistent with clinical trial findings, supporting the recommendation of avelumab as a standard of care.

Association of race/ethnicity and insurance with survival in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in a large real-world cohort.

The large real-world EHR dataset Flatiron has shown that race was not significantly associated with poorer survival in patients with DLBCL. Medicaid insurance status was significantly associated with poorer overall survival and time to second-line therapy or death due to any cause in patients with DLBCL aged <65 years.

OBJECTIVE: Few studies have evaluated disparities in race, ethnicity, and health insurance in real­world health outcomes for patients with diffuse large B­cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study aimed to evaluate association between racial disparities and health insurance with real­world health outcomes. METHODS: Patients with DLBCL (January 2011­July 2021) treated with first­line therapy were selected from a real­world database. Variables of interest included race/ethnicity, health insurance type (Medicaid, Commercial) by patient age (<65, ≥65 years), stage at diagnosis, overall survival (OS), and time to second­line therapy or death due to any cause (TTNTD). RESULTS: Among 5362 patients with DLBCL (82% White, 7% Black, 8% Hispanic/Latino, 3% Asian), White patients were older (mean age, 66.7 vs. 59.3­62.5 years) and less likely to have Medicaid insurance (1.7% vs. 3.4%­5.9%). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) for OS (Black, 0.88 [95% confidence interval, 0.72­1.07]; Hispanic/Latino, 0.84 [0.70­1.03]; Asian, 0.82 [0.59­1.16]) and TTNTD (Black, 0.89 [0.75­1.05]; Hispanic/Latino, 0.85 [0.73­1.00]; Asian, 1.11 [0.86­1.43]) were similar to those of White patients. Among patients aged <65 years, Medicaid­insured versus Commercially insured patients had more advanced disease (stage III­IV, 66% vs. 48%), worse OS (aHR, 0.52 [0.34­0.80]; p = 0.003), and shorter TTNTD (aHR, 0.70 [0.49­0.99]; p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistically significant difference in these variables/outcomes between Medicaid­insured and commercially insured patients aged ≥65 years. Medicaid­insured status was significantly associated with poorer OS and TTNTD in patients with DLBCL aged <65 years but not in those aged ≥65 years, with or without adjusting for other baseline characteristics. Race was not significantly associated with these outcomes.

Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan as second-line treatment for patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a review and meta-analysis of an emerging option.

Introduction: The aim of this study was to provide a review of the clinical evidence for use of ramucirumab (RAM) plus folinic acid (leucovorin), fluorouracil (5-FU), and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or irinotecan as second-line treatment in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of PubMed was performed to identify phase 2 clinical trials or retrospective studies using RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan in GEA, including abstracts from major congresses, in addition to published manuscripts. An aggregated review and meta-analysis was performed to assess the effectiveness (overall response rate [ORR] as primary outcome) and safety data of RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan. ORR for each study was calculated with 95% confidence interval estimated from normal approximation. To generate the combined ORR with 95% confidence interval, random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize response data from available studies. Results: Six studies were identified with non-overlapping populations, 3 phase 2 clinical trials and 3 retrospective studies. Across these studies the ORR ranged from 22% to 38%, and pooled ORR was 25.4%. Two of the 3 studies reported better ORR in patients pretreated with taxanes followed by RAM plus FOLFIRI. Treatment with RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated. Neutropenia and diarrhea were the most common adverse events reported across studies. Conclusion: The studies examined in this review suggest that RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan have activity in previously treated GEA irrespective of prior-taxane use. Overall, RAM plus FOLFIRI or irinotecan was well tolerated with no new safety concerns identified beyond established profiles for these regimens.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy plus PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy as second-line therapy in metastatic pancreatic cancer: a single-arm, phase II clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent hypofractionated radiotherapy plus anti-PD-1 antibody and SOX chemotherapy in the treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) after failure of first-line chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients with pathologically confirmed mPC who failed standard first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The patients were treated with a regimen of hypofractionated radiotherapy, SOX chemotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitors at our institution. We collected the patients' clinical information and outcome measurements. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was the primary endpoint of the study, followed by disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS) and safety. Exploratory analyses included biomarkers related to the benefits. RESULTS: Between February 24, 2021, and August 30, 2023, twenty-five patients were enrolled in the study, and twenty-three patients who received at least one dose of the study agent had objective efficacy evaluation. The mPFS was 5.48 months, the mOS was 6.57 months, and the DCR and ORR were 69.5% and 30.4%, respectively. Among the seven patients who achieved a PR, the median duration of the response was 7.41 months. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels were associated with better overall survival. Besides, pretreatment inflammatory markers were associated with tumor response and survival. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically meaningful antitumor activity and favorable safety profiles were demonstrated after treatment with these combination therapies in patients with refractory mPC. On-treatment decreased serum CA19-9 levels and pretreatment inflammatory markers platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) might be biomarkers related to clinical benefits. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=130211 , identifier: ChiCTR2100049799, date of registration: 2021-08-09.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on utilizing anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy as a second-line treatment for relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Introduction: Inconsistent results observed in recent phase III trials assessing chimeric antigenic receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy as a second-line treatment compared to standard of care (SOC) in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) prompted a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of CAR-T cell therapy in this setting. Methods: Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to pool effect estimates for comparison between CAR-T cell therapy and SOC. Mixed treatment comparisons were made using a frequentist network meta-analysis approach. Results: Meta-analysis of three trials with 865 patients showed significant improvement in event-free survival (EFS: HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.27-0.97; I2: 92%), progression-free survival (PFS: HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.37-0.60; I2: 0%) with CAR-T cell therapy compared to SOC. Although there was a signal of potential overall survival (OS) improvement with CAR-T cell therapy, the difference was not statistically significant between the two groups (HR 0.76; 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.03; I2: 29%). Mixed treatment comparisons showed significant EFS benefit with liso-cel (HR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.22-0.61) and axi-cel (HR: 0.42; 95% CI: 0.29-0.61) compared to tisa-cel. Discussion: CAR-T cell therapy, as a second-line treatment, appears to be effective in achieving higher response rates and delaying the disease progression compared to SOC in R/R DLBCL.

Combination of anlotinib and second-line chemotherapy as surrogate to reduce immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Objective: To study the clinical effects of anlotinib combined with second-line chemotherapy (SLC) on immunosuppression in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods: In this retrospective study, the medical records of 106 patients with advanced NSCLC admitted to the Lianyungang First People's Hospital from November 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Amongst 106 patients, 53 patients received second-line single-agent chemotherapy regimens (SLC group), and 53 patients received anlotinib combined with SLC (ASLC group). Prognosis, levels of immune cells and inflammatory cytokine, and adverse reactions were analyzed. Results: Clinical efficacy of the ASLC group was significantly higher than the SLC group (p<0.05). After treatment, patients in the ASLC group exhibited significantly higher levels of CD4+/CD8+ and CD4+ compared to those in the SLC group (p<0.05), while the difference in CD8+ level between the two groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05). After treatment, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-10 (IL-10), interleukin-8 (IL-8), interleukin-6 (IL-6) in the ASLC group were lower compared to the SLC group (p<0.05). Conclusion: In patients with advanced NSCLC, anlotinib combined with SLC is associated with higher levels of immune cells and reduced inflammatory factors. This treatment regimen, thus, can reduce immunosuppression and improve the prognosis of NSCLC patients.

Impact of Type of Lenvatinib Resistance on Prognosis and Second-Line Regimen in Patients with Virus-Associated HCC.

Background: Lenvatinib is the first-line treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the impact of lenvatinib resistance on patient prognosis is unknown. Methods: We recruited all patients with advanced HCC who received first-line lenvatinib treatment between February 2019 and February 2023 at two medical centers in China, according to the selection criteria. The patients were divided into primary and secondary resistance groups based on tumor progression within 3 months. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore factors influencing drug resistance and prognosis. The study end points were drug resistance, PFS, and OS. Results: A total of 531 patients met the study criteria, with 169 (31.8%) and 362 (68.2%) patients in the primary and secondary groups, respectively. An alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration > 400 ng/mL was an independent risk factor for primary drug resistance. Patients in the primary group had a significantly shorter median OS (11.0 vs 31.0 months, P<0.001) than those in the secondary group. The 1-, 2- and 3-year cumulative survival rates in the primary group were 46.3%, 22.2%, and 10.1%, while those in the secondary group were 82.3%, 59.1% and 44.9%, respectively. Compared to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy, longer median PFS (4.0 vs 7.0 months, P=0.008) and OS (11.0 vs 23.0 months, P=0.024) were achieved with the combination of a TKI plus a PD-1 inhibitor as a second-line therapy after lenvatinib resistance. Conclusion: There is a high rate of primary resistance to lenvatinib in patients with HCC and the prognosis for those with primary resistance is poor. TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors should be preferentially recommended for lenvatinib-resistant patients.