Watchman device migration and embolization: A report from the NCDR LAAO Registry.

INTRODUCTION: Incomplete anchoring of the Watchman left atrial appendage closure (LAAO) device can result in substantial device migration or device embolization (DME) requiring percutaneous or surgical retrieval. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of Watchman procedures (January 2016 through March 2021) reported to the National Cardiovascular Data Registry LAAO Registry. We excluded patients with prior LAAO interventions, no device released, and missing device information. In-hospital events were assessed among all patients and postdischarge events were assessed among patients with 45-day follow-up. RESULTS: Of 120 278 Watchman procedures, the in-hospital DME rate was 0.07% (n = 84) and surgery was commonly performed (n = 39). In-hospital mortality rate was 14% among patients with DME and 20.5% among patients who underwent surgery. In-hospital DME was more common: at hospitals with a lower median annual procedure volume (24 vs. 41 procedures, p < .0001), with Watchman 2.5 versus Watchman FLX devices (0.08% vs. 0.04%, p = .0048), with larger LAA ostia (median 23 vs. 21 mm, p = .004), and with a smaller difference between device and LAA ostial size (median difference 4 vs. 5 mm, p = .04). Of 98 147 patients with 45-day follow-up, postdischarge DME occurred in 0.06% (n = 54) patients and cardiac surgery was performed in 7.4% (n = 4) of cases. The 45-day mortality rate was 3.7% (n = 2) among patients with postdischarge DME. Postdischarge DME was more common among men (79.7% of events but 58.9% of all procedures, p = .0019), taller patients (177.9 vs. 172 cm, p = .0005), and those with greater body mass (99.9 vs. 85.5 kg, p = .0055). The rhythm at implant was less frequently AF among patients with DME compared to those without (38.9% vs. 46.9%, p = .0098). CONCLUSION: While Watchman DME is rare, it is associated with high mortality and frequently requires surgical retrieval, and a substantial proportion of events occur after discharge. Due to the severity of DME events, risk mitigation strategies and on-site cardiac surgical back-up are of paramount importance.

Left atrial appendage dimension predicts elevated brain natriuretic peptide in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: BNP elevation in patients with AF is observed in the absence of heart failure; however, prior mechanistic studies have not included direct left atrial pressure measurements. This study sought to understand how emptying function of the left atrial appendage (LAA) and LAA dimension contributes to brain-natriuretic peptide elevations (BNP) in atrial fibrillation (AF) accounting for left atrial pressure (LAP). METHODS: 132 patients referredfor left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) were prospectively enrolled in this study. BNP levels and LAP were measured just before LAAO. Statistical analysis considered BNP, rhythm at time of procedure, LAP, LAA morphology, LAA size (ostial diameter, depth, volume), LAA emptying velocity, CHADS2-VASc score, body mass index (BMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) diagnosis as covariates. RESULTS: Bivariate statistical analysis demonstrated positive associations with age, LAA ostial diameter, depth, and volume, LAP, AF status at time of measurement, OSA, and CHADS2-VASc score. BNP was negatively associated with LVEF, eGFR, LAA emptying velocity and BMI. With multivariate logistic regression including LAP as covariate, significant relationships between BNP and AF/AFL(OR 1.99 [1.03, 3.85]), LAP (OR 1.13 [1.06, 1.20]), LAA diameter (OR 1.14 [1.03, 1.27]), LAA depth (OR 1.14 [1.07, 1.22]), and LAA emptying velocity (OR 0.97 [0.96,0.99]) were observed; however, no significant associations were seen with LAA morphology or CHADS2-VASc score. CONCLUSIONS: BNP elevations in AF are associated with LAA size and function, but not CHADS2-VASc score or appendage morphology after accounting for changes in LAP.

Transforming a pre-existing MRI environment into an interventional cardiac MRI suite.

AIMS: To illustrate the practical and technical challenges along with the safety aspects when performing MRI-guided electrophysiological procedures in a pre-existing diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. METHODS AND RESULTS: A dedicated, well-trained multidisciplinary interventional cardiac MRI team (iCMR team), consisting of electrophysiologists, imaging cardiologists, radiologists, anaesthesiologists, MRI physicists, electrophysiological (EP) and MRI technicians, biomedical engineers, and medical instrumentation technologists is a prerequisite for a safe and feasible implementation of CMR-guided electrophysiological procedures (iCMR) in a pre-existing MRI environment. A formal dry run "mock-up" to address the entire spectrum of technical, logistic, and safety issues was performed before obtaining final approval of the Board of Directors. With this process we showed feasibility of our workflow, safety protocol, and bailout procedures during iCMR outside the conventional EP lab. The practical aspects of performing iCMR procedures in a pre-existing MRI environment were addressed and solidified. Finally, the influence on neighbouring MRI scanners was evaluated, showing no interference. CONCLUSION: Transforming a pre-existing diagnostic MRI environment into an iCMR suite is feasible and safe. However, performing iCMR procedures outside the conventional fluoroscopic lab, poses challenges with technical, practical, and safety aspects that need to be addressed by a dedicated multi-disciplinary iCMR team.