Optimal treatment for women with acute hypertension in pregnancy; a randomized trial comparing intravenous labetalol versus nicardipine.

OBJECTIVES: Blood pressure control in severe hypertension of pregnancy is crucial for mother and neonate. In absence of evidence, guidelines recommend either intravenous labetalol or nicardipine. We compared the effectiveness and safety of these two drugs in women with severe hypertension in pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: We performed an open label randomized controlled trial. Women with a singleton pregnancy complicated by severe hypertension (systolic ≥ 160 mmHg and/or diastolic ≥ 110 mmHg) requiring intravenous antihypertensive treatment were randomized to intravenous labetalol or intravenous nicardipine. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome defined as severe Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS), Broncho Pulmonary Dysplasia (BPD), Intraventricular Hemorrhage (IVH) IIB or worse, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), or perinatal death defined as fetal death or neonatal death before discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Based on a power analysis, we estimated that 472 women (236 per group) needed to be included to detect a difference of 15% in the primary outcome with 90% power. The study was halted prematurely at 30 inclusions because of slow recruitment and trial fatigue. RESULTS: Between August 2018 and April 2022, we randomized 30 women of which 16 were allocated to intravenous nicardipine and 14 to intravenous labetalol. The composite adverse neonatal outcome was not significantly different between the two groups (25 % versus 43 % OR 0.28 (95 % CI 0.05-1.43), p = 0.12)). Respiratory distress syndrome occurred more often in the labetalol group than in the nicardipine group (42.9 % versus 12.5 %). Neonatal hypoglycemia occurred more often in the nicardipine group than in the labetalol group (31 % versus 7 %). Time until blood pressure control was faster in women treated with nicardipine than in women treated with labetalol (45 (15-150 min vs. 120 (60-127,5) min). CONCLUSION: In our prematurely halted small RCT, we were unable to provide evidence for the optimal choice of treatment for severe hypertension to improve neonatal outcome and/or to obtain faster blood pressure control. Differences in Respiratory distress syndrome and neonatal hypoglycemia between the groups might be the result of coincidental finding due to the small groups included in the study. A larger randomized trial would be needed to determine the safest and most efficacious (intravenous) therapy for severe hypertension in pregnancy. This study emphasizes the challenges of conducting a RCT for the optimal treatment for these women.

A Comparative Study of Oral Nifedipine and Intravenous Labetalol for Acute Hypertensive Management in Pregnancy: Assessing Feto-Maternal Outcomes in a Hospital-based Randomized Control Trial.

Background and Objective: Hypertension is one of the most common medical complications during pregnancy and a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Severe preeclampsia is defined as blood pressure (BP) >160/110 mmHg with warning signs such as headache, blurring of vision, and epigastric pain. Nifedipine (C17H18N2O6), labetalol (C19H24N2O3), and hydralazine (C8H8N4) are commonly used drugs, and all are recommended as first-line agents. Hydralazine is associated with a higher incidence of adverse outcomes, so oral nifedipine has been proposed as a first-line alternative to intravenous labetalol. Consequently, this study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of oral nifedipine with that of intravenous labetalol. The objective is to compare the ability/effectiveness of oral nifedipine and intravenous labetalol to normalize acute hypertension in severe preeclampsia and to assess the birth outcome. Relations between different factors were established by appropriate statistical tests. The p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Methods: The study was conducted on 120 antenatal women with blood pressure ≥160/110 mmHg admitted to our hospital, a tertiary care center, from January 1st, 2020 to June 30th, 2021. Patients were randomized by a single blinding method to receive intravenous labetalol and oral nifedipine. The primary outcome measures were the time taken to control the blood pressure and the number of doses of drugs required. The secondary outcome measures were the birth outcome like a method of delivery, side effect profile, and the number of admissions in the neonatal intensive care unit. Results: A total of 120 patients were included with 60 patients in each group. The labetalol group took 48.67 ± 17.80 minutes and the nifedipine group took 64.33 ± 9.81 minutes to achieve a target BP of <=140/90 mmHg (p < 0.05). No side effects were seen in 70% of patients in the labetalol group and 71.67% in the nifedipine group (p > 0.05). Conclusion and Global Health Implications: Intravenous labetalol is faster in restoring blood pressure in pregnant women with preeclampsia than oral nifedipine and may be used as a first-line drug in the acute control of blood pressure in a hypertensive emergency during pregnancy. More studies are needed in order to evaluate the findings from this pilot study in a large sample of patients.

Nifedipine outperforms labetalol: A comparative analysis of hypertension management in black pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Nifedipine has previously exhibited superior efficacy to labetalol in managing hypertension in the non-pregnant Black population, establishing itself as a first-line treatment option. However, the unique challenges of hypertension during pregnancy, especially prevalent in Black individuals, remain underexplored in terms of effective medication choices. This gap highlights the need for targeted research on antihypertensive efficacy specifically within this population. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of nifedipine versus labetalol in managing blood pressure in Black pregnancies. The primary measure is the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure trajectories throughout pregnancy, determining the superiority of nifedipine in this context. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a multi-center institution in the metropolitan Detroit area, encompassing data from 1,235 Black pregnancies affected by chronic hypertension between 2015 and 2022. Mean blood pressure trajectories during pregnancy were fit by linear mixed effects model with a random intercept and time effect. RESULTS: Patients on nifedipine had an estimated 2.08 mmHg lower mean systolic and 1.60 mmHg lower mean diastolic blood pressure compared to those on labetalol, with significant p-values of 0.040 and 0.028. Additionally, nifedipine users were less likely to need increased doses, with an odds ratio of 0.28 (95 % CI: 0.19-0.40, p < 0.001) compared to labetalol users. CONCLUSION: This study provides compelling evidence that nifedipine outperforms labetalol in managing blood pressure during Black pregnancies. These findings suggest that the initiation of nifedipine should be considered in the management of chronic hypertension among Black pregnant individuals, offering a potentially more effective treatment option.

Clinical Profile of Patients Presenting With Eclampsia at a Semi-urban Tertiary Care Center.

Introduction Pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders contribute to enormous burden on economy and health-care facilities. Eclampsia is one of the clinical markers of near-miss mortality. To achieve optimal outcomes, efforts should be directed at both periphery and tertiary care levels. This study aimed to compare the feto-maternal outcome in patients presenting with eclampsia and a matched control population. Methodology A comparative observational study was conducted among 70 cases and 70 controls. Detailed history and general and obstetrical examinations were carried out. Data was extracted from case files, labor room, and ICU records. Maternal and fetal outcomes were noted from January 2023 to January 2024. Statistical software STATA 14.2 (StataCorp LLC, College Station, Texas, USA) was used for data analysis. Observational descriptive statistics and chi-square and Fisher extract tests were applied. Results In our study, the incidence of eclampsia was 0.7% (70 per 1000 live births). The maternal mortality rate was 102.8/100000 live births and the perinatal mortality rate was 10.2/ 1000 live births in our study. The study observed a relatively young aged population and a significant bulk of cases belonged to late gestation or post-partum. Events like HELLP syndrome, abruption, liver, and renal failure were found to be frequently linked to eclampsia. Neonatal asphyxia (P-0.005), NICU requirement 41.43% vs 29% (P<0.01) preterm delivery 45.7% vs 14% (P=<0.001), and low birth weight were more commonly observed among the cases than the controls. Conclusions Eclampsia was found to be a significant contributor to elevated rates of morbidity and mortality in mothers and newborns. Poor antenatal care, severe anemia, and late referrals were some of the modifiable risk factors. Health care and economic burden on society is immense due to the significant utilization of intensive care and high dependency units.

Labetalol Dosing in Pregnancy: PBPK/PD and CYP2C19 Polymorphisms.

As detailed information on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of labetalol in pregnant people are lacking, the aims of this study were: (1) to build a physiologically based PK (PBPK) model of labetalol in non-pregnant individuals that incorporates different CYP2C19 genotypes (specifically, *1/*1, *1/*2 or *3, *2/*2, and *17/*17); (2) to translate this model to the second and third trimester of pregnancy; and (3) to combine the model with a previously published direct pharmacodynamic (PD) model to predict the blood pressure lowering effect of labetalol in the third trimester. Clinical data for model evaluation was obtained from the scientific literature. In non-pregnant populations, the mean ratios of simulated versus observed peak concentration (Cmax), time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve, AUC) were 0.94, 0.82, and 1.16, respectively. The pregnancy PBPK model captured the observed PK adequately, but clearance was slightly underestimated with mean ratios of simulated versus observed Cmax, Tmax, and AUC of 1.28, 1.30, and 1.39, respectively. The results suggested that pregnant people with CYP2C19 *2/*2 alleles have similar labetalol exposure and trough levels compared to non-pregnant controls, whereas those with other alleles were found to have increased exposure and trough concentrations. Importantly, the pregnancy PBPK/PD model predicted that, despite increased exposure in some genotypes, the blood pressure lowering effect was broadly comparable across all genotypes. In view of the large inter-individual variability and the potentially increasing blood pressure during pregnancy, patients may need to be closely monitored for achieving optimal therapeutic effects and avoiding adverse events.

Lipid Emulsions Inhibit Labetalol-Induced Vasodilation in the Isolated Rat Aorta.

Lipid emulsions are used as adjuvant drugs to alleviate intractable cardiovascular collapse induced by drug toxicity. We aimed to examine the effect of lipid emulsions on labetalol-induced vasodilation and the underlying mechanism in the isolated rat aorta. We studied the effects of endothelial denudation, NW-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME), calmidazolium, methylene blue, 1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a] quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ), and lipid emulsions on labetalol-induced vasodilation. We also evaluated the effects of lipid emulsions on cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) formation, endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation, and endothelial calcium levels induced by labetalol. Labetalol-induced vasodilation was higher in endothelium-intact aortas than that in endothelium-denuded aortas. l-NAME, calmidazolium, methylene blue, and ODQ inhibited labetalol-induced vasodilation in endothelium-intact aortas. Lipid emulsions inhibited labetalol-induced vasodilation in endothelium-intact and endothelium-denuded aortas. l-NAME, ODQ, and lipid emulsions inhibited labetalol-induced cGMP formation in endothelium-intact aortas. Lipid emulsions reversed the stimulatory and inhibitory eNOS (Ser1177 and Thr495) phosphorylation induced by labetalol in human umbilical vein endothelial cells and inhibited the labetalol-induced endothelial calcium increase. Moreover, it decreased labetalol concentration. These results suggest that lipid emulsions inhibit vasodilation induced by toxic doses of labetalol, which is mediated by the inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide release and reduction of labetalol concentration.

Comparison of the Effects of Hydralazine and Labetalol on Intracranial Pressure When Used for Blood Pressure Control in Patients With Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.

Background Recommendations on optimal agents to manage blood pressure (BP) in patients with an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are lacking. A case series suggests that hydralazine can cause intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation in an ICH. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of intravenous (IV) hydralazine to IV labetalol on ICP in patients with ICH. Materials and methods A retrospective chart review from September 2015 to September 2021 on adults admitted to a level I trauma center with ICH, requiring an external ventricular drain or ICP monitor, and pharmacologic intervention with IV hydralazine or IV labetalol. ICP measurements and clinical interventions 0-80 minutes prior to and after medication administration were compared. Data points were excluded if multiple antihypertensive agents were administered. Results A total of 27 patients were included (three received only hydralazine, 13 only labetalol, and 11 both). Twenty-seven doses of hydralazine and 115 doses of labetalol were compared. There was no significant difference in mean ICP 0-80 minutes following hydralazine and labetalol administration (p = 0.283). Of the hydralazine doses, 29.6% received intervention for elevated ICP, while 25.2% of labetalol doses received intervention (p = 0.633). Hydralazine patients received m = 0.56 interventions for ICP, and labetalol patients received m = 0.36 interventions (p = 0.223). Of the patients that required intervention for ICP management, hydralazine patients required m = 1.88 interventions, while labetalol patients required m = 1.41 interventions (p = 0.115).  Conclusion There was no significant difference in mean ICP at 0-80 minutes following administration of hydralazine or labetalol. There was also no significant difference in interventions required for elevated ICP management between groups. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy: Prevalence and Treatment in the United States, 2008-2021.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. In this study, we examined the prevalence and treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy and assessed changes in these outcomes following the release of the updated 2017 hypertension guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. METHODS: We analyzed the MerativeTM Marketscan® Research Database of United States commercial insurance claims from 2007 to 2021. We assessed the prevalence of chronic hypertension during pregnancy and oral antihypertensive medication use over time. We then performed interrupted time series analyses to evaluate changes in these outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic hypertension steadily increased from 1.8% to 3.7% among 1 900 196 pregnancies between 2008 and 2021. Antihypertensive medication use among pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension was relatively stable (57%-60%) over the study period. The proportion of pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension treated with methyldopa or hydrochlorothiazide decreased (from 29% to 2% and from 11% to 5%, respectively), while the proportion treated with labetalol or nifedipine increased (from 19% to 42% and from 9% to 17%, respectively). The prevalence or treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy did not change following the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association hypertension guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of chronic hypertension during pregnancy doubled between 2008 and 2021 in a nationwide cohort of individuals with commercial insurance. Labetalol replaced methyldopa as the most commonly used antihypertensive during pregnancy. However, only about 60% of individuals with chronic hypertension in pregnancy were treated with antihypertensive medications.

Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol on coagulation, vascular endothelial function and pregnancy outcome in early-onset severe preeclampsia.

OBJECTIVE: This paper was aimed at unveiling the effect of low-molecular-weight heparin calcium (LMWH) combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol on coagulation, vascular endothelial function, and pregnancy outcome in early-onset severe preeclampsia (EOSP). METHODS: Pregnant women with EOSP were divided into the control group and the study group, each with 62 cases. Patients in the control group were treated with labetalol and magnesium sulfate, and those in the study group were treated with LMWH in combination with the control grou Blood pressure (systolic blood pressure [SBP] and diastolic blood pressure [DBP]), 24-h urine protein, coagulation indices [D-dimer (D-D), plasma fibrinogen (Fg), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and prothrombin time (TT)], endothelial function [endothelin (ET-1) and nitric oxide (NO)], oxidative stress indices [oxidized low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL), lipid peroxidation (LPO), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and malondialdehyde (MDA)], pregnancy outcome, and adverse effects occurred in the two groups were compared. RESULTS: After treatment, lower SBP, DBP, and 24-h urine protein levels; lower Fg and D-D levels; higher PT, APPT, and TT levels; higher NO levels; lower ET-1 levels; lower ox-LDL, MDA, and LPO levels; higher SOD levels; and lower incidence of adverse pregnancy and adverse reactions were noted in the study group in contrast to the control group. CONCLUSION: EOSP patients given with LMWH combined with magnesium sulfate and labetalol can effectively reduce the patient's blood pressure and urinary protein level; improve coagulation function, oxidative stress, and vascular endothelial function indices; reduce the adverse pregnancy outcomes; and improve the safety of treatment.

Efficacy of Magnesium Sulfate and Labetalol in the Treatment of Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension and Its Effect on Anxiety and Depression: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: In this study, the effect of magnesium sulfate and labetalol in treating pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) and its influence on anxiety and depression in patients are observed, and new ideas for treating anxiety and depression in PIH are introduced. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted to select patients with PlH diagnosed from July 2020 to July 2023 from Affiliated Hospital of Electronic Science and Technology University and Chengdu Women' s and Children's Central Hospital in Chengdu of Sichuan Province. The changes in blood pressure, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), and generalized anxiety disorder 7 (GAD-7) in patients with hypertensive pregnancy were collected and analyzed. Results: In our investigation, 219 patients completed the study, and 36.1% (79/219) of them developed anxiety and depression. According to whether the patients were treated with magnesium sulfate and labetalol, 49 cases were assigned to the magnesium sulfate and labetalol treatment (MSLT) group, and 30 cases were assigned to the conventional treatment (CT) group. Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores and GAD-7 scores in the MSLT group were significantly lower than those in the CT group, indicating that magnesium sulfate and labetalol can improve anxiety and depression in hypertensive patients during pregnancy. The difference was statistically significant (P < .05). According to the changes in systolic blood pressure, the clinical efficacy of patients was evaluated, and no significant difference in efficacy existed between the MSLT and CT groups. Conclusion: Magnesium sulfate and labetalol can control the blood pressure of patients with PIH and indirectly improve anxiety and depression in patients with PIH, thereby introducing new ideas for the treatment of PIH accompanied by anxiety and depression.

Effects of magnesium sulfate combined with labetalol on inflammatory stress and pregnancy outcome of patients with gestational hypertension.

Gestational hypertension (GH) is a common disorder during pregnancy that can cause adverse pregnancy outcomes. In the present study, magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) combined with labetalol was used for clinical treatment. Randomized controlled trial was conducted in 100 patients with GH, documented in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Taicang TCM Hospital) grouped into the experimental (Expt) and control (Ctrl) groups (n=50 cases/group). The Ctrl group was treated with MgSO4, whereas the Expt group was treated with MgSO4 + labetalol. The systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the Expt group were not significantly different from those in the Ctrl group (P>0.05). By contrast, the SBP and DBP were significantly lower after treatment than those before treatment in both groups (P<0.05). Whole blood viscosity, plasma viscosity and hematocrit were significantly lower in the Expt group compared with those in the Ctrl group after treatment (P<0.05). High mobility group box-1 protein, homocysteine and serum cystatin C levels in the Expt group were also markedly lower than those in the Ctrl group after treatment (P<0.05). In the Expt group, the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery was much higher, whereas the rates of cesarean section and postpartum hemorrhage were markedly lower than those in the Ctrl group (P<0.05). The occurrence of fetal intrauterine distress, placental abruption, neonatal asphyxia, premature birth and neonatal death were also significantly lower in the Expt group than those in the Ctrl group (P<0.05). In conclusion, MgSO4 + labetalol could improve inflammatory stress and the hemodynamics of patients with GH, and may have a marked antihypertensive effect. Thus, it may improve pregnancy outcome and reduce perinatal complications.

Antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy induces long-term changes in gut microbiota and the behaviors of the attention deficit hyperactivity disorder offspring.

The pathogenesis of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has not been fully elucidated. Gestational hypertension could double the probability of ADHD in the offspring, while the initial bacterial communication between the mother and offspring has been associated with psychiatric disorders. Thus, we hypothesize that antihypertensive treatment during pregnancy may abate the impairments in neurodevelopment of the offspring. To test this hypothesis, we chose Captopril and Labetalol, to apply to pregnant spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) dams and examined the outcomes in the male offspring. Our data demonstrated that maternal treatment with Captopril and Labetalol had long-lasting changes in gut microbiota and behavioral alterations, including decreased hyperactivity and increased curiosity, spatial learning and memory in the male offspring. Increased diversity and composition were identified, and some ADHD related bacteria were found to have the same change in the gut microbiota of both the dam and offspring after the treatments. LC-MS/MS and immunohistochemistry assays suggested elevated expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and dopamine in the prefrontal cortex and striatum of offspring exposed to Captopril/ Labetalol, which may account for the improvement of the offspring's psychiatric functions. Therefore, our results support the beneficial long-term effects of the intervention of gestational hypertension in the prevention of ADHD.

Comparison of labetalol and lidocaine in induction of controlled hypotension in tympanoplasty: a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of labetalol and lidocaine in tympanoplasty surgery, specifically evaluating their impact on hemodynamic changes and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted with 64 patients scheduled for tympanoplasty. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5-2 mg/min labetalol or 1.5 mg/kg/h lidocaine 1% to achieve controlled hypotension during surgery. The efficacy of the drugs was assessed by comparing the Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP), surgeon's satisfaction, time to target MAP, bleeding volume, postoperative pain scores, the need for analgesic medication in recovery, sedation, and other additional parameters. RESULTS: The hemodynamic parameters showed a similar trend over time in both the labetalol and lidocaine groups. The median bleeding volume in the labetalol group (10 cc) was lower than that in the lidocaine group (30 cc), although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.11). Similarly, surgeon's satisfaction level, pain intensity, and sedation level in the recovery room did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). The duration of surgery, recovery stay, and extubation time also did not significantly differ between the groups. Both medications took approximately the same time (20 min) to reach the target MAP and exhibited comparable hemodynamic responses (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both labetalol and lidocaine effectively achieved controlled hypotension during tympanoplasty surgery, thereby improving surgical conditions. The choice of medication should be based on individual patient characteristics and the anesthesiologist's judgment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

An audit of postoperative haemodynamic stability after intraoperative labetalol administration in non-cardiac surgery patients.

Anaesthesiologists commonly use intravenous labetalol to adjust patient haemodynamics during surgical procedures. Cases of profound hypotension after continuous labetalol infusions have been reported; however, there is limited evidence regarding the safety of intraoperative labetalol boluses. This audit examined the frequency of postoperative hypotension and bradycardia in 292 adult non-cardiac surgery patients treated with intraoperative labetalol boluses. Blood pressure and heart rate data were collected from the post-anaesthesia care unit and on the floor units for 24 hours after surgery. The median total intraoperative labetalol dose was 10mg. A total of 30/292 patients had all-cause postoperative hypotension within 24 hours of surgery, 26 of which had other medical or surgical precipitants. Fifteen patients developed bradycardia. There were no deaths or intensive care unit admissions attributed to labetalol. This audit demonstrates a low risk of all-cause postoperative hypotension (10%) and bradycardia (5%) after the use of small IV doses of intraoperative labetalol.

Effects of intravenous nicardipine followed by oral labetalol in combination with nifedipine controlled-release tablet on severe peripartum hypertension.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of intravenous nicardipine as initial therapy and oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet as subsequent treatment of severe peripartum hypertension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Intravenous nicardipine was delivered as the initial treatment, after the target blood pressure (BP) had been achieved, oral labetalol was used to maintain the target BP. If oral labetalol failed to maintain the target BP, oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet was used. RESULTS: A total number of 131 patients were enrolled. The target BP (BP < 140/90 mmHg) was achieved in all patients within 60 minutes by intravenous nicardipine. After receiving labetalol orally, the target BP was maintained in nine patients. However, in 104 patients, we had to combine oral labetalol and nifedipine controlled-release tablet due to re-elevation of their systolic BP to 140-159 mmHg. In 18 patients, we restarted intravenous nicardipine because their systolic BP re-elevated above 160 mm Hg. Among the 104 patients who received oral labetalol and nifedipine controlled-release tablet, the target BP was achieved and maintained in 96 patients, and eight patients had to restart nicardipine. Of the total number of 26 patients in whom intravenous nicardipine was resumed, the target BP was successfully maintained in 22 patients with oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous nicardipine rapidly and safely lowered severe peripartum hypertension. As subsequent therapy, oral labetalol combined with nifedipine controlled-release tablet protocol may be applied to effectively maintain a target BP.

Risk of postpartum readmission after hypertensive disorder of pregnancy and variation by discharge antihypertensive medication prescription.

BACKGROUND: Patients with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy have a high rate of postpartum readmission. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate whether the type of antihypertensive medication prescribed at discharge was associated with postpartum readmission after a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study of 57,254 pregnancies complicated by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy between 2012 and 2018 in the electronic obstetrical database of Kaiser Permanente Northern California. Postpartum readmissions occurred within 6 weeks after discharge from delivery hospitalization. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the association between the type of antihypertensive medication prescription at discharge (none, labetalol only, nifedipine only, or 2 or more antihypertensive medications) and postpartum readmission, adjusted for type of hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, final inpatient systolic and diastolic blood pressures, age, body mass index, mode of delivery, insurance status, race and ethnicity, delivery facility, comorbidity score, smoking, preterm delivery, parity, and Neighborhood Deprivation Index. RESULTS: Among eligible patients with a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy, 1696 (3.0%) were readmitted within 6 weeks. Approximately 86% of patients were discharged without a prescription for antihypertensive medication; among those discharged with a prescription for antihypertensive medication, most were prescribed either labetalol only (54%) or nifedipine only (30%). The unadjusted readmission risk was the highest for patients discharged with a prescription for labetalol only (7.6%), lower for those discharged with a prescription for nifedipine only (3.6%) or 2 or more antihypertensive medications (3.2%), and the lowest for those discharged without a prescription for antihypertensive medication (2.5%). In the adjusted models, compared with discharge without a prescription for antihypertensive medication, discharge with a prescription for labetalol only was associated with a 63% (hazard ratio, 1.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.41-1.88) greater incidence of postpartum readmission, and discharge with a prescription for nifedipine only and discharge with a prescription for 2 or more antihypertensive medications were associated with 26% (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.93) and 47% (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-0.74) lower incidence of postpartum readmission, respectively. There was no strong evidence to suggest that the effect of the type of antihypertensive medication at discharge on the incidence of readmission varied by race and ethnicity (interaction P=.88). The results indicating an elevated risk associated with labetalol use were consistent in models that excluded patients with prepregnancy hypertension. CONCLUSION: Discharge with a prescription for nifedipine alone or multiple antihypertensive medications (vs no medication) was associated with a lower incidence of readmission, whereas discharge with a prescription for labetalol alone was associated with an elevated readmission incidence. A large-scale, prospective research to compare the effectiveness of commonly prescribed hypertension medications at discharge is warranted.

Chronic Drug-Induced Liver Injury from Labetalol during the Postpartum Period: A Case Report.

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a common cause of transaminitis in pregnancy. A 34-year-old G3P2012 presented 3 weeks postpartum for preeclampsia with severe features. After receiving acute antihypertensive medications, she was discharged home with labetalol. She presented 5 months later with general malaise, scleral icterus, nausea, and mild right upper quadrant pain and found to have significantly elevated transaminitis. She had a negative infectious, autoimmune, biliary, and steatohepatitis workup. A liver biopsy was performed supporting the diagnosis of DILI. After patient self-discontinued labetalol, her hepatitis significantly improved. However, she developed chronic DILI and liver enzymes normalized during her subsequent pregnancy at 34 weeks. Patient's written consent was obtained for this case report. Chronic DILI secondary to labetalol use is a rare and potentially fatal condition that should be considered on the differential for transaminitis during pregnancy and postpartum period.

Evaluation of the Effects of Tianma Gouteng Decoction Combined with Magnesium Sulfate and Labetalol on Lowering Blood Pressure and Improving Hemorheology in Patients with Gestational Hypertension / 广州中医药大学学报

Objective To observe the effects of Tianma Gouteng Decoction combined with magnesium sulfate and Labetalol on lowering blood pressure and improving hemorheology in patients with gestational hypertension.Methods Ninety patients with gestational hypertension of liver-yang hyperactivity type were randomly divided into the combination group and the control group,with 45 cases in each group.The control group was treated with magnesium sulfate combined with Labetalol,and the combination group was treated with Tianma Gouteng Decoction on the basis of treatment for the control group.The course of treatment lasted for 5 days.The changes of systolic blood pressure(SBP),diastolic blood pressure(DBP),urinary protein level,and hemorheological indicators of the two groups were observed before and after the treatment.Moreover,the adverse pregnancy outcomes,adverse reactions,and patients'satisfaction of the two groups were compared.Finally,the influencing factors of patients'adverse pregnancy outcomes were investigated by logistic regression analysis.Results(1)After treatment,the SBP,DBP and urinary protein level of patients in the two groups were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment(P＜0.05),and the decrease in the combination group was significantly superior to that in the control group(P＜0.01).(2)After treatment,the hemorheological indicators of plasma viscosity,whole blood viscosity and hematocrit of patients in the two groups were significantly decreased compared with those before treatment(P＜0.05),and the decrease in the combination group was significantly superior to that in the control group(P＜0.05 or P＜0.01).(3)The total incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes in the combination group was 11.11%(5/45),which was significantly lower and that in the control group(33.33%,15/45),the difference being statistically significant(P＜0.05).(4)The patients'satisfaction of the combination group was 97.78%(44/45),which was significantly higher than that of the control group(84.44%,38/45),and the difference was statistically significant(P＜0.05).(5)The total incidence of adverse reactions in the combination group was 13.33%(6/45)and that in the control group was 8.89%(4/45),but the intergroup comparison showed no significant difference between the two groups(P＞0.05).(6)Logistic regression analysis of influencing factors showed that no medication of Tianma Gouteng Decoction combined with Labetalol and magnesium sulfate,and poor antihypertensive effect were the independent risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes in patients with gestational hypertension(all OR＞1,P＜0.05).Conclusion Tianma Gouteng Decoction combined with magnesium sulfate and Labetalol in treating gestational hypertension exerts certain antihypertensive effect,and the therapy can effectively improve the hemorheological indicators and the adverse pregnancy outcomes,and enhance the patients'satisfaction.

Pharmacogenomics of Preeclampsia therapies: Current evidence and future challenges for clinical implementation.

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy-specific disorder, and it is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The application of pharmacogenetics to antihypertensive agents and dose selection in women with preeclampsia is still in its infancy. No current prescribing guidelines from the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium (CPIC) exist for preeclampsia. Although more studies on pharmacogenomics are underway, there is some evidence for the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies, considering both the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of drugs used in preeclampsia. It has been revealed that the CYP2D6*10 variant is significantly higher in women with preeclampsia who are non-responsive to labetalol compared to those who are in the responsive group. Various genetic variants of PD targets, i.e., NOS3, MMP9, MMP2, TIMP1, TIMP3, VEGF, and NAMPT, have been investigated to assess the responsiveness of antihypertensive therapies in preeclampsia management, and they indicated that certain genetic variants of MMP9, TIMP1, and NAMPT are more frequently observed in those who are non-responsive to anti-hypertensive therapies compared to those who are responsive. Further, gene-gene interactions have revealed that NAMPT, TIMP1, and MMP2 genotypes are associated with an increased risk of preeclampsia, and they are more frequently observed in the non-responsive subgroup of women with preeclampsia. The current evidence is not rigorous enough for clinical implementation; however, an institutional or regional-based retrospective analysis of audited data may help close the knowledge gap during the transitional period from a traditional approach (a "one-size-fits-all" strategy) to the pharmacogenomics of preeclampsia therapies.