ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rotavirus infections are a significant cause of severe diarrhea and related illness and death in children under five worldwide. Despite the global introduction of vaccinations for rotavirus over a decade ago, rotavirus infections still result in high deaths annually, mainly in low-income countries, including Ethiopia, and need special attention. This system review and meta-analysis aimed to comprehensively explore the positive proportion of rotavirus at pre- and post-vaccine introduction periods and genotype distribution in children under five with diarrhea in Ethiopia. METHODS: The review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Database sources included PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Epistemonikos, focusing on studies published before November 30, 2023. The search targeted rotavirus infection and genotype distribution in Ethiopia before and after the introduction of the Rota vaccine. Data was managed using EndNote 2020 software and stored in an Excel 2010 sheet. A random-effects model determined the pooled estimate of the rotavirus infection rate at 95% confidence intervals. The Q-and I² statistics were used to assess the study heterogeneity, and a funnel plot (Egger test) was used to determine the possibility of publication bias. RESULTS: The analysis included data from nine studies conducted in different regions of Ethiopia. The overall prevalence of rotavirus infection was significant, with a prevalence rate of approximately 22.63% (1362/6039). The most common genotypes identified before the Rota vacation introduction were G1, G2, G3, G12, P [4], P [6], P [8], P [9], and P [10]. Meanwhile, G3 and P [8] genotypes were particularly prevalent after the Rota vaccine introduction. These findings highlight the importance of implementing preventive measures, such as vaccination, to reduce the burden of rotavirus infection in this population. The identified genotypes provide valuable insights for vaccine development and targeted interventions. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the evidence base for public health interventions and strategies to reduce the impact of rotavirus infection in children under five in Ethiopia. Despite the rollout of the Rota vaccination in Ethiopia, rotavirus heterogeneity is still high, and thus, enhancing vaccination and immunization is essential.
Subject(s)
Genotype , Rotavirus Infections , Rotavirus Vaccines , Rotavirus , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/virology , Humans , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus/genetics , Rotavirus/classification , Rotavirus/immunology , Infant , Child, Preschool , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Diarrhea/virology , Diarrhea/epidemiology , PrevalenceABSTRACT
We report the case of a 7-year-old girl with severe generalized prurigo associated with diffuse persistent pruritic nodules due to sensitization to aluminum-adsorbed vaccines. Treatment with dupilumab resulted in an excellent therapeutic response.
ABSTRACT
While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have shown strong efficacy, their suboptimal uptake combined with the continued emergence of new viral variants raises concerns about the ongoing and future public health impact of COVID-19. We investigated viral and host factors, including vaccination status, that were associated with SARS-CoV-2 disease severity in a setting with low vaccination rates. We analyzed clinical and demographic data from 1,957 individuals in the state of Georgia, USA, coupled with viral genome sequencing from 1,185 samples. We found no difference in disease severity between individuals infected with Delta and Omicron variants among the participants in this study, after controlling for other factors, and we found no specific mutations associated with disease severity. Compared to those who were unvaccinated, vaccinated individuals experienced less severe SARS-CoV-2 disease, and the effect was similar for both variants. Vaccination within 270 days before infection was associated with decreased odds of moderate and severe outcomes, with the strongest association observed at 91-270 days post-vaccination. Older age and underlying health conditions, especially immunosuppression and renal disease, were associated with increased disease severity. Overall, this study provides insights into the impact of vaccination status, variants/mutations, and clinical factors on disease severity in SARS-CoV-2 infection when vaccination rates are low. Understanding these associations will help refine and reinforce messaging around the crucial importance of vaccination in mitigating the severity of SARS-CoV-2 disease.
ABSTRACT
The SARS-COV-2 infection-related severe illness is prevented by vaccinations. Therefore, it is relevant to report a case of post vaccine meningoencephalitis in a 30 year old male Indian patient, who presented with weakness in all the extremities, episodes of loose stool, fever, vomiting, tachypnea and loss of consciousness immediately following the 2nd dose of the COVID vaccination (COVAXIN).
ABSTRACT
Background of the study: The protection against Coronavirus variants 2019 by pre-existing antibodies due to the current vaccination or natural infection is a global concern. In Ethiopia, case reports show that a significant number of health professionals are reported to get re-infected after vaccination. There are also more studies that revealed the symptomatic SARS-COV-2 re-infection, in particular, among healthcare providers actively engaged in Addis Ababa public health facilities. Objective: This study has aimed at assessing the magnitude of post-vaccine reinfection of SARS-COV-2 and associated factors among health care providers in Addis Ababa public hospitals, Addis Ababa, 2022 G.C. Methods: A facility-based cross-sectional study was conducted from July 11 to July 30, 2022. A total of 422 health professionals were included. A simple random sampling method was employed to select 40% of the total hospitals. Then the total sample size was equally allocated to each selected hospital, and then each individual was selected purposefully. The data was collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire. The analysis was done using SPSS version 26.0, and for data entry, EPi Info version 7.1 was used. Both bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the p-value. Results: Overall, 418 healthcare providers were enrolled in this study, making the response rate 99.05%. The magnitude of SARS-COV-2 reinfection was 60 (14.4%) (95% CI 10.8-17.9). Healthcare professionals who took infection prevention (IP) training on COVID-19 (AOR = 7.177: CI = 4.761-9.698) were associated with SARS-COV-2 reinfection; those with a history of chronic respiratory diseases (AOR = 3.029: CI = 2.406-9.133) were associated with SARS-COV-2 reinfection; health professionals who took the third dose of SARS-COV-2 vaccine (AOR = 1.75: CI = 1.14-2.68) and being a midwife were statistically significant. Conclusion and Recommendation: This study showed the prevalence of SARS-COV-2 reinfection among vaccinated healthcare providers with a pre-vaccination infection history was high; IP training on COVID-19 was needed; educational status, profession, type of vaccine taken in the first dose, chronic respiratory diseases, and number of vaccinations were significantly associated with SARS-COV-2 reinfection after vaccination. Giving IP training, encouraging taking the vaccine as protocol, and using proper personal protective equipment are recommended.
ABSTRACT
Immunity status after mass vaccination program against SARS CoV-2 has not been evaluated in Bangladesh. This study aims to assess the IgG response against SARS-CoV-2 among the vaccine receivers in Bangladesh. After signed consent, blood samples were tested for SARS CoV-2 IgG from volunteers between March, 21 and April, 22 using ELISA where IgG index ≥0.9 was considered as positive Among 3034 participants, IgG positivity was calculated approximately 82% for vaccine recipients; lowest (58%) during March-April, 21 which increased to 85-95% later. IgG positivity and mean index was 82% and 3.04 in vaccinated whereas 56% and 1.5 in unvaccinated cases. IgG positivity and mean index reduced with age: 90% and 2.56, 79% and 2.23, 73% and 2.13 in 18-40 y, 41-60 y, >60 y group respectively. Vaccinated with COVID-19 history showed highest IgG positivity and index (94% and 3.1) compared to vaccinated without COVID-19 history (76% and 1.6), unvaccinated with COVID-19 history (75% and 1.5) and unvaccinated without COVID-19 history (51% and 0.9). IgG positivity and index reduced as interval between IgG testing and vaccination increases. Our findings suggest a robust IgG response among the vaccine recipients. Negative correlation of IgG positivity and index with age and time necessitates continuous monitoring of immunity status.
ABSTRACT
Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at high risk of COVID-19 infection despite vaccination. Limited data exist on COVID-19 cases among vaccinated HCWs. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of RT PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases in vaccinated HCWs, at a COVID clinic in a medical college hospital. This single-center, prospective cohort study included HCWs who received at least one dose of the COVID-19 vaccine and tested positive for COVID-19 within 6 months. Data on demographics, symptoms, work category, COVID-19 vaccination interval, and infection severity were collected. Of 2381 vaccinated HCWs, 105 tested positive and were categorized as mild, moderate, or severe cases. Among vaccinated HCWs, 4.41% had post-vaccine COVID-19 infections. All 105 cases received the first dose, and 79 received the second dose. Of the cases, 47.6% were partially vaccinated, and 53.3% were breakthrough cases. The mean age was 30.90±8.69 years, with 63.8% male and 36.2% female cases. Most cases (85.7%) acquired infection in the hospital, and 47.6% had direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Common symptoms included fatigue (85.7%), fever (82.9%), and cough (64.8%). Among cases, 93.3% were mild, 5.7% were moderate, and 0.9% were severe. Hospital admission and supplemental oxygen therapy were required for moderate and severe cases. No mortality was reported. Certain variables were associated with age, preventive measures, workplace type, symptoms, and comorbidities. Breakthrough infections can occur among fully vaccinated HCWs but with reduced severity and mortality. Monitoring and infection control measures remain crucial even in vaccinated individuals. This study provides insights into clinical presentations, oxygen therapy requirements, and outcomes of post-vaccine COVID-19 cases among HCWs. The data will inform strategies for booster doses to prevent COVID-19.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , Female , Male , Young Adult , Adult , COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Hospitals, University , India/epidemiology , Health Personnel , OxygenABSTRACT
Our aim was to evaluate the immune response of healthcare workers included in the RIPOVAC study, after receiving a booster dose (third dose), in terms of intensity and persistence of induced antibodies. In the second phase of the RIPOVAC study, between December 2021 and January 2022, eight months after the second dose, 389 voluntary, immunocompetent, non-pregnant healthcare workers received a booster dose of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and a serum sample was obtained. Two groups of patients were established: with and without previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. In order to quantify anti-S1 IgG (AU/mL) we used CMIA (Abbott). All of the health workers were anti-S IgG positive 8 months after receiving the booster dose of the vaccine, with a mean of 17,040 AU/mL. In 53 patients without previous infection, antibody levels increased by a mean of 10,762 AU/mL. This figure is seven times higher than the one produced after the second dose (1506 AU/mL). The booster dose produces a robust elevation of the antibody level, which persists at 8 months, with levels significantly higher than those reached after the second dose, which allow one to predict a persistence of more than one year. The study demonstrates the efficacy of the booster dose of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Health Personnel , Immunoglobulin G , Antibodies, ViralABSTRACT
Objective The objective of this study was to identify potential associations between coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination center reception location and time to presentation to the emergency department for acute COVID-19 infection. The a priori hypothesis was that there are significant differences in the outcome based on vaccination administration center type. Methods This was a cross-sectional, observational study conducted within a hospital in Lakeland, Florida, between October 2021 and May 2022. Participants were at least 18 years old with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARSCoV2) infection and at least two COVID-19 symptoms at enrollment. Patients with prior confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis and hospitalization within 10 days of screening were excluded. Participants were sampled from within the emergency department of the institution. The primary outcome was time to presentation to the emergency department for acute COVID-19 infection since the last vaccination dose from each sampled COVID-19 vaccination center location. Results A total of 93 participants were analyzed. Of these, 48 (52%) participants received COVID-19 vaccination. Participants vaccinated at vaccine clinics demonstrated a significantly longer mean survival time (288.2 (29.9)) compared to other sites. Significant predictors of hospitalization were age (aOR, 1.09, 95%CI 1.02-1.16, p < 0.01), sex (aOR: 10.05, 95%CI 1.52-66.54, p < 0.05), physical function (aOR, 0.90, 95%CI 0.83-0.97, p < 0.01) and number of medications (aOR, 1.34, 95%CI 1.14-1.58, p < 0.001). Conclusions This exploratory analysis highlights the need for further investigation into both characteristics of healthcare institutions and individual-level factors that may play a role in the prolonged prevention of emergency department presentations due to COVID-19 infection. Increased transparency of data regarding practices related to the administration of COVID-19 vaccines across various institutions may be beneficial in further understanding the role of COVID-19 vaccinations in preventing symptomatic disease across local and global communities.
ABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this study was to determine the health problems experienced by young adults after the COVID-19 vaccine. METHOD: This study is a quantitative and descriptive study and was completed with 590 undergraduate students studying at a state university in Central Anatolia in the spring semester of the 2021-2022 academic year. The data were collected by the researcher through a one-to-one interview with the students and a questionnaire prepared in line with the literature. Number, percentage and chi-square tests were used in the analysis of the data. RESULTS: A total of 81.4% of the students participating in the study had the BioNTech-Pfizer vaccine. A total of 67.3% of them had two doses of COVID-19 vaccine, 35.9% of the vaccinated students experienced some health problems in the days following the vaccination, and the most common health problems were fatigue, a cough, sleep disturbance, psychological discomfort, a heart ache feeling and sweating. Most of the post-vaccine health problems lasted for 2 days, 3.7% of the participants were diagnosed with hypertension, 2.7% were diagnosed with diabetes mellitus and 10.52% of the female participants went to the doctor due to menstrual irregularity and received treatment. It was determined that 12.2% of the vaccinated students gained weight after vaccination and 63.89% of those who gained weight attributed this to increased appetite, 9.2% continued to have a cough and 9.2% used herbal products. CONCLUSION: It was determined that one out of every three young adults experienced a health problem after the COVID-19 vaccine. It is recommended that studies be conducted in different sample groups.
ABSTRACT
Background: In late 2019, Coronavirus disease 2019 has been declared as a global emergency by World Health Organization. Hopefully, recent reports of effective and safe vaccines were welcomed, and approved on emergency base. Millions of recipients had received one of the approved COVID 19 vaccines, with lots of adverse events recorded global wide. Objective: To assess post-COVID vaccination immune-mediated adverse events and evaluate its association to specific type of vaccine global wide. Methods: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis of published reports (since December 2020 till December 2021) on immune-mediated adverse events post-COVID vaccination. Results: We evaluated 34 published studies; 460 cases with various adverse events post-COVID vaccination. Studies in current literature are primarily retrospective case series, isolated case reports or narrative studies. Different COVID vaccines were involved. Results' data was subcategorized according to associated vaccine. Adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccinations included thrombotic, neurological, myocarditis, ocular, dermatological, renal, hematological events timely linked to inoculation. Each vaccine type was linked to adverse profile that differ from others. Conclusion: High suspicion of post-vaccination adverse events is mandatory to provoke earlier detection, better understanding, optimum prevention, and management. Specific vaccine/patient risk profile is needed to selectively categorize target population to reduce morbidity and mortality post-vaccination.
ABSTRACT
The introduction of the COVID-19 vaccines has led to an immense sense of relief for the global population. However, since the introduction of these vaccines, there have been several reports related to the side effects. A young woman presented to her primary care doctor with a vesicular rash three days after the BNT162b2 messenger RNA (mRNA) Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, which was preceded by a low-grade fever for one day. Our case report highlights the challenges in diagnosing a vesicular rash post the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Identifying the cause of a vesicular rash following vaccination has remained a challenge among primary care practitioners.
ABSTRACT
This is the case report of an 84-year-old man affected by COVID-19 between the 2 doses of vaccination, with negative exitus. We analyzed nasopharyngeal samples of viral RNA collected during the disease and nasopharyngeal and lung samples collected postmortem by reverse transcription LAMP (RT-LAMP) PCR and Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). NGS results were analyzed with different bioinformatic tools to define virus lineages and the related single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Both lung and nasopharyngeal samples tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 on RT-LAMP. Through bioinformatic analysis, 2 viral RNAs from the nasal swabs, which belonged to the B.1.1.7 lineage, and 1 viral RNA from the lung sample, which belonged to the B.1.533 lineage, were identified. This genetic observation suggested that SARS-CoV-2 tends to change under selective pressure. The high mutation rate of ORFa1b, containing a replicase gene, was a biological image of a complex viral survival system.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Mutation , RNA, Viral/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/geneticsABSTRACT
Since the declaration of Coronavirus-2019 (COVID-19) as a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO), it was clear that vaccination is the best way to overcome it. Sinopharm, AstraZeneca and Pfizer were the first vaccines introduced to defeat it. To recognize the short-term adverse effects among Iraqi health care workers (HCWs) after vaccination, the three COVID-19 vaccines that are currently available in Iraq were compared. An online survey was distributed to Iraqi HCWs who had received at least one of the COVID-19 vaccines as part of a retrospective cross-sectional study. Data were statistically analyzed using SPSS. The total number of participants was 843. The majority of the participants (85.9%) were under 39 years old, with 78.8% of them being females. Around 60% of individuals had received the Pfizer vaccine. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) had infected 46.7% of the total participants. A total of 628 out of 843 participants experienced adverse effects after receiving the vaccine, accounting for 74.49% of the overall respondents. After receiving the COVID-19 vaccine, the vast majority of respondents who received the three vaccines experienced pain at the injection site (n = 800), while other side effects like headache, myalgia, tiredness and fever mainly appeared with Pfizer and AstraZeneca vaccines. Most of the reported adverse effects were tolerable and self-limited and they were linked to the AstraZeneca and Pfizer vaccines.
ABSTRACT
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, as a result of the SARS-CoV-2 virus, since December 2019, is a major health problem and concern worldwide. The pandemic has impacted various fields, from the social to the development of health science and technology. The virus has been mutating and thus producing several new variants, rushing research in the field of molecular biology to develop rapidly to overcome the problems that occur. Vaccine clinical studies are developing promptly with the aim of obtaining vaccines that are effective in suppressing the spread of the virus; however, the development of viral mutations raises concerns about the decreasing effectiveness of the resulting vaccine, which also results in the need for more in-depth studies. There have been 330 vaccines developed, including 136 clinical developments and 194 pre-clinical developments. The SARS-CoV-2 variant continues to evolve today, and it poses a challenge in testing the effectiveness of existing vaccines. This is a narrative review describing the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, development of vaccine platforms, identification of concerning mutations and virus variants in various countries of the world, and real-world monitoring of post-vaccination effectiveness and surveillance.
ABSTRACT
We present a rare case of meningoradiculitis occurring after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. This patient, with a history of inflammatory arthritis following rubella vaccination, presented to the emergency department 4 days after her vaccination with both central and radicular nervous system symptoms. Symptoms included pain, sensory and motor deficits in L5 roots distribution, along with signs of central irritation, such as headache, difficulty concentrating and a Babinski sign. MRI showed bilateral L5 nerve roots enhancement. Lumbar puncture showed elevated protein and IgG, and relevant serologies excluded common causes. Prednisone and physical therapy helped the patient to achieve near complete recovery nine weeks after presentation. We concluded that this patient presented meningoradiculitis probably secondary to her vaccination in a context of possible overactive immune system. While such presentations might be rare, and do not constitute a general reason to abstain from vaccination, they must be well recognized and treated.
ABSTRACT
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory infectious disease that caused a worldwide pandemic in December 2019. It affected millions of people across the world and forced nations to lockdown their borders and implement curfews to control the spread of the disease. Unusual manifestations of the disease should be reported and be kept in mind among physicians. We report a case of a 33-year-old man who was fully vaccinated with two doses of Pfizer vaccine and presented with fever, epigastric pain, and diarrhea without any respiratory symptoms. The patient had a longer than usual incubation period of 16 days without reporting any signs of respiratory infection for the period of his infection. His laboratory investigations and chest X-ray were all normal. The patient did not require any treatment and his COVID-19 infection lasted for 10 days. Clinicians should understand that post-vaccination COVID-19 cases might present with a longer incubation period than usual and might present with gastrointestinal symptoms as the sole complaint.
ABSTRACT
Even though vaccination programs have now started in earnest across the globe and in Qatar, vaccine hesitancy remains a barrier to effectively tackling the pandemic. Many factors influence willingness to take vaccines including safety, efficacy, and side effects. Given their proximity to research and education, university students and employees represent an interesting cohort in which to investigate vaccine hesitancy. The aim of this study was to assess the attitudes of Qatar University employees and students towards the COVID-19 vaccine. In total, 231 employees and 231 students participated in an online cross-sectional study in February 2021. Of the sample, 62.6% were willing to take a vaccine against COVID-19. Participants with or taking postgraduate degrees were more willing to take the vaccine compared to participants with or taking a diploma or bachelor's degree (p < 0.001). Males had a higher rate of vaccine acceptance (p < 0.001). In the group that regarded flu vaccination as important, 13% were unwilling to take COVID-19 vaccine. There were no associations between willingness to vaccinate and vaccine/virus knowledge and social media use. Participants showed a high level of concern regarding vaccine side effects in themselves or their children. Two-thirds agreed or strongly agreed that they would take the vaccine if it was mandatory for international travel. Our participants were neutral to the origin of vaccine development. These findings, which represent data collected after the start of the national vaccination program, show that vaccine hesitancy persists in the Qatari population and that some groups, such as undergraduate students, could benefit from specific, targeted public health campaigns.