Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonresponding patients before abandoning cTACE in patients with liver metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-institutional analysis, patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and lung cancer who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions from 2001 to 2015 were studied. Quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria were utilized for response assessment. The association between the number of cTACE and 2-year, 5-year, and overall survival was evaluated to estimate the optimal number of cTACE for each survival outcome. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients underwent a total of 186 cTACE sessions for 117 liver metastases, of which 30.7 % responded to the first cTACE. For the target lesions that did not respond to the first, second, and third cTACE sessions, response rates after the second, third, and fourth cTACE sessions were 33.3 %, 23 %, and 25 %, respectively. The fourth cTACE session was the optimal number for 2-year survival (HR 0.40; 95 %CI: 0.16-0.97; p = 0.04), 5-year survival (HR 0.31; 95 %CI: 0.11-0.87; p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.13-0.89; p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Repeat cTACE in the management of liver metastases from NET, CRC, and lung cancer was associated with improved patient survival. We recommend at least four cTACE sessions before switching to another treatment for nonresponding metastatic liver lesions.

Transarterial embolization is an acceptable bridging therapy to hepatocellular carcinoma prior to liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignant neoplasm that requires liver transplantation (LT). Despite patients with HCC being prioritized by most organ allocation systems worldwide, they still have to wait for long periods. Locoregional therapies (LRTs) are employed as bridging therapies in patients with HCC awaiting LT. Although largely used in the past, transarterial embolization (TAE) has been replaced by transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). However, the superiority of TACE over TAE has not been consistently shown in the literature. AIM: To compare the outcomes of TACE and TAE in patients with HCC awaiting LT. METHODS: All consecutive patients with HCC awaiting LT between 2011 and 2020 at a single center were included. All patients underwent LRT with either TACE or TAE. Some patients also underwent percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI), concomitantly or in different treatment sessions. The choice of LRT for each HCC nodule was determined by a multidisciplinary consensus. The primary outcome was waitlist dropout due to tumor progression, and the secondary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events. In the subset of patients who underwent LT, complete pathological response and post-transplant recurrence-free survival were also assessed. RESULTS: Twelve (18.5%) patients in the TACE group (only TACE and TACE + PEI; n = 65) and 3 (7.9%) patients in the TAE group (only TAE and TAE + PEI; n = 38) dropped out of the waitlist due to tumor progression (P log-rank test = 0.29). Adverse events occurred in 8 (12.3%) and 2 (5.3%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.316). Forty-eight (73.8%) of the 65 patients in the TACE group and 29 (76.3%) of the 38 patients in the TAE group underwent LT (P = 0.818). Among these patients, complete pathological response was detected in 7 (14.6%) and 9 (31%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.145). Post-LT, HCC recurred in 9 (18.8%) and 4 (13.8%) patients in the TACE and TAE groups, respectively (P = 0.756). Posttransplant recurrence-free survival was similar between the groups (P log-rank test = 0.71). CONCLUSION: Dropout rates and posttransplant recurrence-free survival of TAE were similar to those of TACE in patients with HCC. Our study reinforces the hypothesis that TACE is not superior to TAE as a bridging therapy to LT in patients with HCC.

Unleashing the potential: transarterial chemoembolization combined with intra-arterial infusion of bevacizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) alone with transarterial chemoembolization combined with the arterial infusion of bevacizumab (TACE + Bev) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 446 uHCC patients treated with TACE or TACE + Bev between January 2021 and March 2023. The study evaluated objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events in both treatment groups. RESULTS: Finally, the TACE group comprised 295 patients, and the TACE + Bev group comprised 151 patients. Patients in the TACE + Bev group exhibited significantly prolonged median PFS (7.9 months vs. 10.3 months, P = 0.013) and median OS (16.1 months vs. 21.4 months, P = 0.041), improved ORR (26.8% vs. 37.7%, P = 0.017) and DCR (71.5% vs. 80.8%, P = 0.033) compared to the TACE group. Multifactorial Cox analysis identified alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) > 400 ng/ml as an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. Meanwhile, portal vein cancer thrombosis and distant metastasis are poor prognostic factors for OS. The overall incidence of adverse events was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: In comparison with the TACE group, the TACE + Bev group demonstrated efficacy in improving outcomes for patients with uHCC with a manageable safety profile.

Diagnostic value of serum inflammatory markers in predicting early refractoriness of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage 0, A, and B hepatocellular carcinoma

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is an established therapeutic strategy for intermediate stage Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, patients who are early refractory to TACE may not benefit from repeated TACE treatment. Our primary objective was to assess the diagnostic value of inflammatory markers in identifying early TACE refractory for patients with early (BCLC 0 and A) or intermediate (BCLC B) stage HCC. We retrospectively reviewed the HCC patients who underwent TACE as the initial treatment in two hospitals. Patients with early TACE refractoriness had significantly poorer median overall survival (OS) (16 vs 40 months, P<0.001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (7 vs 23 months, P<0.001) compared to TACE non-refractory patients. In the multivariate regression analysis, tumor size (P<0.001), bilobular invasion (P=0.007), high aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) (P=0.007), and high alpha fetoprotein (AFP) level (P=0.035) were independent risk factors for early TACE refractoriness. The predictive model showcasing these factors exhibited high ability proficiency, with an area under curve (AUC) of 0.833 (95%CI=0.774-0.892) in the training cohort, 0.750 (95%CI: 0.640-0.861) in the internal-validation cohort, and 0.733 (95%CI: 0.594-0.872) in the external-validation cohort. Calibration curve analysis revealed good agreement between the actual and predicted probabilities of early TACE refractoriness. Our preliminary study estimated the potential value of inflammatory markers in predicting early TACE refractoriness and provides a predictive model to assist in identifying patients who may not benefit from repeat TACE treatment.

Efficacy comparison of optimal treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma patients with portal vein tumor thrombus.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Optimal treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) involving portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) remains controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 627 HCC patients with PVTT after initial treatment with one of the following at Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Guangxi Medical University: liver resection (LR, n = 225), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 298) or sorafenib (n = 104) were recruited and randomly divided into the training cohort (n = 314) and internal validation cohort (n = 313). Survival analysis were repeated after stratifying patients by Cheng PVTT type. RESULTS: Resection led to significantly higher OS than the other two treatments among patients with type I or II PVTT. TACE worked significantly better than the other two treatments for patients with type III. All three treatments were associated with similar OS among patients with type IV. These findings were supported by the internal validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the optimal treatment for HCC involving PVTT depends on the type of PVTT. LR may be more appropriate for type I or II PVTT; TACE, for type III Sorafenib may be more appropriate than invasive treatments for patients with type IV PVTT.

Experience with Sorafenib in 3 Hospitals in Sao Paulo.

INTRODUCTION AND AIM: Sorafenib has been the standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, a complex disease that affects an extremely heterogenous population. Thereby requiring multidisciplinary individualized treatment strategies that match the disease characteristics and the patients' specific needs. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data for 175 patients who received sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma in three different hospitals in Sao Paulo, Brazil over a span of nine years were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 62 years. Percentages of patients with Child-Pugh A, B and C liver cirrhosis were 61%, 31% and 5%, respectively. Approximately half of the patients had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B disease, and the other half had stage C. The median treatment duration was 253 days. Sorafenib dose was reduced to 400 mg/day in 41% of the patients due to toxicity. Overall objective response rate as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and its modified version was 39%. Patients who received transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) at any point during sorafenib therapy were significantly more likely to experience an objective response. After a median follow-up of 339 days, the median overall survival was 380 days. Child-Pugh cirrhosis, tumor response and concomitant chemoembolization were independent prognostic factors for overall survival in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that, in experienced hands, sorafenib therapy may benefit carefully selected hepatocellular carcinoma patients for whom other therapies are initially contraindicated, including those patients with Child-Pugh B liver function and those patients who are subsequently treated with concomitant TACE.

CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads (DEB) transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is equally efficient and safe in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional TACE treatments: a result from CTILC study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in liver cancer patients with different times of previous conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) treatments. METHODS: 367 liver cancer patients about to receive DEB-TACE treatment were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. All patients were divided into no previous cTACE group (NPC group), 1-2 times previous cTACE group (PC group) and triple or above previous cTACE group (TPC group) according to the times of previous cTACE treatments. RESULTS: There was no difference in complete response (CR) (P = 0.671) and objective response rate (ORR) (P = 0.062) among three groups. Additionally, no difference in overall survival (OS) among groups (P = 0.899) was found. As to liver function, most liver function indexes were deteriorative at 1 week after DEB-TACE operation, but returned to baseline at 1-3 months after DEB-TACE operation in all three groups, while percentage of abnormal total bile acid (TBA) patients was higher in TPC group than NPC and PC groups at 1-3 month post-DEB-TACE (P = 0.018). As for safety profiles, the incidence of pain during DEB-TACE operation was lower in TPC group compared to NPC and PC groups (P = 0.005), while no difference of other adverse events was found during and 1 month post-DEB-TACE treatment among three groups. CONCLUSION: DEB-TACE treatment was equally efficient and tolerated in liver cancer patients with different times of previous cTACE treatments.

Retrospective analysis of efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors in a cohort of Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization

The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. Patients (n=102) diagnosed as primary HCC were consecutively enrolled in this retrospective cohort study. Treatment responses were assessed following the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated, and adverse events (AEs) as well as liver function-related laboratory indexes of all DEB-TACE records (N=131) were assessed. Complete response (CR) rate, objective response rate, and disease control rate were 51.0, 87.3, and 95.1%, respectively, at 1-3 months post DEB-TACE. The mean PFS and OS were 227 (95%CI: 200-255) days and 343 (95%CI: 309-377) days, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that portal vein invasion and abnormal total protein (TP) were independent predictive factors for worse CR, and multivariate Cox's regression analysis showed that multifocal disease independently correlated with shorter PFS. Most of the liver function-related laboratory indexes worsened at 1 week but recovered at 1-3 months post-treatment, only the percentage of patients with abnormal ALP increased at 1-3 months. In addition, 112 (85.5%), 84 (64.1%), 53 (40.5%), 40 (30.5%), and 16 (12.2%) patients had pain, fever, nausea, vomiting, and other AEs, respectively. DEB-TACE is efficient and safe in Chinese HCC patients, and portal vein invasion, abnormal TP level as well as multifocal disease could be used as unfavorable prognostic factors to DEB-TACE treatment.

Aggressive intrahepatic therapies for synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma with pulmonary metastasis.

PURPOSE: Prognosis of synchronous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with pulmonary metastasis (PM) was poor, while aggressive intrahepatic therapies remained controversial. This study aimed to investigate the significance of aggressive intrahepatic therapies for synchronous PM-HCC. METHODS: Synchronous PM-HCC patients were retrospectively enrolled from Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University during January 2000 and December 2015. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate the prognostic factors. Patients were grouped according to different HCC treatment modalities including liver resection (LR), ablation, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), systemic therapy (ST, systemic chemotherapy or sorafenib) and supportive care (SC). Case control studies were achieved using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis to further investigate the significance of LR, ablation and TACE. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were enrolled, and the median overall survival (OS) was 4.5 months. Serum alpha fetal protein (AFP) ≥ 400 ng/ml, multiple HCC lesions and no intrahepatic therapies (LR/Ablation/TACE) were inferior independent prognostic factors. Patients were divided into LR group (n = 9), Ablation/TACE group (n = 24) and ST/SC group (n = 48). After PSM analysis, survival outcome was superior in LR group compared to Ablation/TACE group (19.6 vs. 6.9 months) (p = 0.023) or ST/SC group (19.6 vs. 2.8 months) (p = 0.034), while no significant difference was found between -Ablation/TACE and ST/SC group (5.1 vs. 3.2 months) (p = 0.338). CONCLUSIONS: Prognosis of synchronous PM-HCC patients was poor. Serum AFP ≥ 400 ng/ml, multiple HCC lesions and no aggressive intrahepatic therapies were inferior prognostic factors. LR might provide survival benefits in well-selected patients, while the significance of ablation or TACE remained to be further investigated.

Safety and efficacy of HepaSphere 50-100 µm in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma.

AIM: To evaluate the effects of HepaSphere 50-100 µm (Merit Medical) as a doxorubicin carrier and embolization agent for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective analysis of 18 patients recruited from a national cancer center was conducted. This analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of HepaSphere, as expressed by the treatment response rate (measured by the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, mRECIST) and by the prevalence of treatment-related adverse events, respectively. RESULTS: The cohort was predominantly male, with a mean age of 69 years. The objective response rate (complete + partial response) was 53.3%. The variable most likely to be associated with objective response was Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging. The most prevalent adverse events were nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: HepaSphere chemoembolization yielded a substantial objective response rate with an acceptable toxicity profile and should be considered an option for HCC treatment.

Distribution of tumor stage and initial treatment modality in patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: This study reviewed the distribution of each tumor stage and each type of initial treatment modality among patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated at a tertiary tumor hospital between January 2003 and October 2013. METHODS: Baseline data of patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma treated between January 2003 and October 2013 were retrospectively collected. Tumor stage was determined according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system and Hong Kong Clinic Liver Cancer (HKLC) staging system. RESULTS: A total of 6241 patients with primary hepatocellular carcinoma were included in the analysis. In accordance with the BCLC, 28.9% of patients were in stage 0/A, 16.2% in stage B, 53.6% in stage C, and 1.3% in stage D. According to the HKLC stage system, 8.4% patients were in stage I, 1.5% in stage IIa, 29.0% in stage IIb, 10.0% in stage IIIa, 33.6% in stage IIIb, 3.4% in stage IVa, 2.5% in stage IVb, 0.2% in stage Va, and 11.4% in stage Vb. Treatment modalities applied to this patient group were as follows: 33.3% of patients underwent hepatic resection, 36.7% underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), 2.2% underwent radiotherapy, 0.9% underwent local ablated therapy, 8.8% underwent systemic chemotherapy, 4.2% underwent traditional herbal medicine therapy, 0.1% underwent targeted drug therapy, and 13.8% received no treatment. Hepatic resection was the most frequent therapy for patients with BCLC 0/A/B disease, and TACE was the initial therapy for patients with BCLC C disease. In the Hong Kong Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, the main treatments for HKLC I to IIIb disease is hepatic resection and TACE. Systemic chemotherapy was the initial therapy for patients with HKLC IVa/IVb disease. Most HKLC Va/Vb patients received traditional Chinese medicine treatment. CONCLUSION: Prevalence of stage BCLC B and C disease was high among our hepatocellular carcinoma patients. In Hong Kong Clinic Liver Cancer staging system, HKLC I to IIIb disease was high among our HCC patients. Hepatic resection and TACE are initial therapies.

Radiofrequency ablation combined with transarterial chemoembolization versus hepatectomy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a retrospective case-control study.

PROPOSAL: To compare the effectiveness of TACE + RFA with hepatectomy in patients with HCC within Milan criteria. METHODS: It is a retrospective matched case-control study from January 2006 to December 2010 in a tertiary cancer center. 74 patients with HCC within Milan criteria initially treated with TACE + RFA were identified and compared with 148 matched controls selected from a pool of 782 patients who received hepatectomy. Patients were matched with respect to age, gender, tumor size and number, AFP and liver function test. RESULTS: The 1, 3, and 5 years overall survival (OS) was 94.6, 75.1 and 55.3%, respectively, in the combination group, and 91.2, 64.4, and 47.7%, respectively, in the hepatectomy group (P = 0.488). The 1, 3, and 5 years disease-free survival (DFS) in the combination group was 87.8, 48.3, and 33.5%, respectively, and 68.9, 49.2, and 40.9%, respectively, in the hepatectomy group (P = 0.619). In subgroups analyses according to the tumor size and number, no significant difference was identified in either OS or DFS for patients with single tumor smaller than 3.0 cm, 3.0-5.0 cm, and multiple tumors. Multivariate analysis showed that tumor size, ALT, and CLIP score were significant prognostic factors for OS, and ALT and Child-Pugh class were significant prognostic factors for DFS. CONCLUSION: TACE + RFA is safe and as effective as hepatectomy for patients with HCC within Milan criteria.

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del hepatocarcinoma: puesta a punto del tema y rol del internista / Diagnosis and therapy of hepatocarcinoma: update of the topic and the internist’s role

El carcinoma hepatocelular es el tumor hepático maligno más frecuente, el 5o más prevalente en el mundo y la tercera causa de mortalidad por cáncer. En más de un 90% de los casos está asociado a cirrosis, su incidencia en dicha población es del 3 al 5%, siendo la primera causa de muerte en este grupo de pacientes. Se espera un incremento de esta incidencia en las próximas 2 décadas. En los últimos años se han desarrollado nuevas estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas que han modificado radicalmente el pronóstico de esta enfermedad. Al asentar sobre una patología donde el manejo médico es primordial el internista cumple un rol fundamental en el adecuado abordaje de esta neoplasia. Tareas como la prevención, la vigilancia, el diagnostico precoz y el enfoque multi e interdisciplinario, en los distintos estadios evolutivos de la enfermedad, son algunos de los aspectos más relevantes. El accionar con el médico hepatólogo es fundamental, definiendo en conjunto las distintas conductas a seguir en las instancias pre y postratamiento...

Diagnóstico y tratamiento del hepatocarcinoma: puesta a punto del tema y rol del internista / Diagnosis and therapy of hepatocarcinoma: update of the topic and the internists role

El carcinoma hepatocelular es el tumor hepático maligno más frecuente, el 5o más prevalente en el mundo y la tercera causa de mortalidad por cáncer. En más de un 90% de los casos está asociado a cirrosis, su incidencia en dicha población es del 3 al 5%, siendo la primera causa de muerte en este grupo de pacientes. Se espera un incremento de esta incidencia en las próximas 2 décadas. En los últimos años se han desarrollado nuevas estrategias diagnósticas y terapéuticas que han modificado radicalmente el pronóstico de esta enfermedad. Al asentar sobre una patología donde el manejo médico es primordial el internista cumple un rol fundamental en el adecuado abordaje de esta neoplasia. Tareas como la prevención, la vigilancia, el diagnostico precoz y el enfoque multi e interdisciplinario, en los distintos estadios evolutivos de la enfermedad, son algunos de los aspectos más relevantes. El accionar con el médico hepatólogo es fundamental, definiendo en conjunto las distintas conductas a seguir en las instancias pre y postratamiento.