ABSTRACT
Objective: This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare nanohydroxyapatite with fluoride on managing post ultrasonic scaling Dentine hypersensitivity (DH). Material and Methods: Thirty patients (aged 20-50 years) with post ultrasonic-scaling DH were included in this study. The sample was randomly divided into three equal groups of 60 teeth each: the first group received nanohydroxyapatite material, the second group received fluoride material and the third group received sterile water as a placebo (controls). The materials were applied once for each patient. All patients were instructed to rate the level of pain before treatment, and after 1 hour, 24 hours, 2 weeks and 1 month on the numerical rating scale (NRS). The Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney tests, linear regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis. Significance level was set at 0.05. Results: Both nanohydroxyapatite and fluoride were successful in reducing pain associated with DH when compared with the placebo in subsequent follow-ups (p < 0.05). However, one-hour and one-day post application, nanohydroxyapatite could reduce hypersensitivity pain moreeffectively than fluoride (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Nanohydroxyapatite material was found to besignificantly more effective in reducing the DH that followed ultrasonic scaling one-hour and one-day post application as compared to fluoride and sterile water. Both fluoride and nanohydroxyapatite had similar effect on DH after two-weeks and one-month after application. (AU)
Objetivo: Este ensaio clínico randomizado teve como objetivo comparar a nano-hidroxiapatita com o flúor no manejo da hipersensibilidade dentinária (HD) pós-raspagem ultrassônica. Material e Métodos: Trinta pacientes (com idades entre 20-50 anos) com HD pós-raspagem ultrassônica foram incluídos neste estudo. A amostra foi dividida aleatoriamente em três grupos iguais com 60 dentes cada: o primeiro grupo recebeu material de nano-hidroxiapatita, o segundo grupo recebeu material de flúor e o terceiro grupo recebeu água esterilizada como placebo (controle). Os materiais foram aplicados uma vez para cada paciente. Todos os pacientes foram instruídos a avaliar o nível de dor antes do tratamento, e após 1 hora, 24 horas, 2 semanas e 1 mês na escala de avaliação numérica (NRS). Os testes de Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney e análise de regressão linear foram usados para a análise estatística. O nível de significância foi estabelecido em 0,05. Resultados: Tanto a nano- hidroxiapatita quanto o flúor foram bem-sucedidos na redução da dor associada à HD quando comparados ao placebo em acompanhamentos subsequentes (p <0,05). No entanto, 1 hora e 1 dia após a aplicação, a nano-hidroxiapatita pode reduzir a dor de hipersensibilidade de forma mais eficaz do que o flúor (p <0,05). Conclusão: O material da nano-hidroxiapatita foi significativamente mais eficaz na redução da HD que se seguiu à raspagem ultrassônica, 1 hora e 1 dia após a aplicação, em comparação com o flúor e a água estéril. Tanto o flúor, quanto a nano-hidroxiapatita apresentou efeito semelhante na HD após 2 semanas e 1 mês após a aplicação (AU)
Subject(s)
Durapatite , Dentin Sensitivity , Dentin Desensitizing Agents , FluoridesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The debridement of diseased root surface is usually performed by mechanical scaling and root planing using manual and power driven instruments. Many new designs in ultrasonic powered scaling tips have been developed. However, their effectiveness as compared to manual curettes has always been debatable. Thus, the objective of this in vitro study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instrumentation on periodontally involved extracted teeth using profilometer and scanning electron microscope (SEM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 30 periodontally involved extracted human teeth were divided into 3 groups. The teeth were instrumented with hand and ultrasonic instruments resembling clinical application. In Group A all teeth were scaled with a new universal hand curette (Hu Friedy Gracey After Five Vision curette; Hu Friedy, Chicago, USA). In Group B CavitronTM FSI - SLI TM ultrasonic device with focused spray slimline inserts (Dentsply International Inc., York, PA, USA) were used. In Group C teeth were scaled with an EMS piezoelectric ultrasonic device with prototype modified PS inserts. The surfaces were analyzed by a Precision profilometer to measure the surface roughness (Ra value in µm) consecutively before and after the instrumentation. The samples were examined under SEM at magnifications ranging from 17x to 300x and 600x. RESULTS: The mean Ra values (µm) before and after instrumentation in all the three groups A, B and C were tabulated. After statistically analyzing the data, no significant difference was observed in the three experimental groups. Though there was a decrease in the percentage reduction of Ra values consecutively from group A to C. CONCLUSION: Within the limits of the present study, given that the manual, magnetostrictive and piezoelectric ultrasonic instruments produce the same surface roughness, it can be concluded that their efficacy for creating a biologically compatible surface of periodontally diseased teeth is similar.