The Effect of Implant-Associated Factors on the Long-Term Outcomes of Dental Implants.

The long-term outcomes of dental implants are influenced by a variety of factors, all of which play critical roles in their stability, functionality, and esthetic appeal. This review focuses on several key characteristics of dental implants that impact their success overtime: dimensional, morphologic, material, osseointegrative, and connective/prosthetic characteristics. This article synthesizes current literature to analyze how these factors influence the long-term success of dental implants, emphasizing the need for a comprehensive approach in implant selection and placement.

Single-piece zirconia versus single-piece titanium, narrow-diameter dental implants in the anterior maxilla: 5-year post-loading results of a randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate esthetic parameters in the anterior maxillary region by comparing single-piece zirconia versus titanium narrow-diameter implants. Additionally, clinical, radiological and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty implants (tissue level implant) were placed in 30 patients in the maxillary esthetic sector. Depending on randomization, a zirconia (test) or titanium implant (control) was placed. Esthetic, clinical, and radiological parameters, including the implant crown esthetic index (ICAI), pink esthetic score (PES), probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, plaque index, and marginal bone levels, were evaluated at 12, 36 and 60 months after loading. RESULTS: Sixty months after crown placement, no significant differences were found between groups. The ICAI values were 5.25 ± 4.21 and 4.50 ± 2.98 for the test and control groups, respectively. The corresponding PES values were 7.44 ± 1.93 and 7.43 ± 1.74 for the test and control groups, respectively. There were no significant intergroup differences for the rest of the parameters evaluated. CONCLUSION: It can be suggested that monotype zirconia implants may serve as a potential alternative to titanium implants in selected clinical scenarios. While the results demonstrated comparable esthetic, clinical, and radiological aspects for zirconia implants as compared to titanium implants after a 5-year follow-up period, further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is recommended.

Investigating the Long-Term Success and Complication Rates of Zirconia Dental Implants: A Prospective Clinical Study.

This study addresses the durability and complications of zirconia dental implants through a prospective clinical investigation. Zirconia implants are increasingly utilized in dental implantation, and a comprehensive understanding of their long-term performance is essential. Background: Zirconia dental implants have gained attention due to their biocompatibility and aesthetics. However, research on their extended success and complication rates is limited. Materials and Methods: A prospective clinical study involved the placement of 30 zirconia dental implants in patients requiring tooth replacement. The implants were followed up for five years. Success was defined as the implant remaining stable and functional. Complications, including peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, were monitored. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, Chi-square test, and P-values were set at P < 0.05. Results: The long-term success rate of zirconia dental implants was found to be 93.3%. Among the 30 implants, only 2 exhibited failure. The most common complication was peri-implant mucositis, occurring in 16.7% of implants. Notably, the incidence of peri-implantitis was limited, observed in 6.7% of implants. Statistical analysis showed significant associations between implant failure and smoking (P = 0.021). Conclusion: Zirconia dental implants demonstrated a high long-term success rate of 93.3% over five years. Peri-implant mucositis was the predominant complication, with a relatively low occurrence of peri-implantitis. The findings underscore the potential of zirconia implants for reliable dental implantation. Addressing modifiable risk factors, such as smoking, could further enhance implant success. Continued research is recommended to validate and expand upon these outcomes.

Zirconia Dental Implants: A Closer Look at Surface Condition and Intrinsic Composition by SEM-EDX.

Modern dental implantology is based on a set of more or less related first-order parameters, such as the implant surface and the intrinsic composition of the material. For decades, implant manufacturers have focused on the research and development of the ideal material combined with an optimal surface finish to ensure the success and durability of their product. However, brands do not always communicate transparently about the nature of the products they market. Thus, this study aims to compare the surface finishes and intrinsic composition of three zirconia implants from three major brands. To do so, cross-sections of the apical part of the implants to be analyzed were made with a micro-cutting machine. Samples of each implant of a 4 to 6 mm thickness were obtained. Each was analyzed by a tactile profilometer and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Compositional measurements were performed by X-ray energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS). The findings revealed a significant use of aluminum as a chemical substitute by manufacturers. In addition, some manufacturers do not mention the presence of this element in their implants. However, by addressing these issues and striving to improve transparency and safety standards, manufacturers have the opportunity to provide even more reliable products to patients.

Reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography, cone beam CT, and dental MRI for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions at zirconia implants - an ex vivo feasibility study.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reliability and accuracy of intraoral radiography (IR), cone-beam-computed tomography (CBCT), and dental magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) in measuring peri­implant bone defects around single zirconia implants. METHODS: Twenty-four zirconia implants were inserted in bovine ribs with various peri­implant defect sizes and morphologies. True defect extent was measured without implant in CBCT. Defects were measured twice in IR, CBCT, and dMRI with the inserted implant by three experienced readers. Reliability was assessed by ICC, accuracy by the Friedman test, and post-hoc-Tukey's test. RESULTS: A comparable good to excellent intra- and inter-reader reliability was observed for all modalities (intra-/inter-rater-CC range for IR; CBCT; dMRI: 0.81-0.91/0.79;0.87-0.97/0.96;0.87-0.95/0.94). Accuracy was generally high, with mean errors below 1 mm in all directions. However, measuring defect depth in the mesiodistal direction was significantly more accurate in dMRI (0.65 ± 0.38 mm) compared to IR (2.71 ± 1.91 mm), and CBCT (1.98 ± 1.97 mm), p-values ≤ 0.0001 respectively ≤ 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: Osseous defects around zirconia implants can be reliably measured in IR/CBCT/dMRI in the mesiodistal directions. In addition, CBCT and dMRI allow assessment of the buccolingual directions. dMRI provides a comparable accuracy in all directions, except for the mesiodistal defect depth, where it outperforms IR and CBCT.

Prosthetically Driven Computer-Guided 1-Piece Zirconia Implant Placement and Restoration Replacing Missing Central Incisor: A Case Report.

Currently, the gold standard material of choice for dental implants is the commercially available pure titanium and titanium alloys. However, this material may have suboptimal anterior esthetic outcome due to the dark grayish burnout. To enhance the esthetic outcomes, zirconium dioxide materials, with reported long-term success in medical uses and tooth-like color, were introduced as a dental implant material. This case report describes the fully guided planning and placement of a 1-piece zirconia implant replacing a missing central incisor. A 21-year-old nonsmoker male patient in excellent general health, presented with a missing tooth #9 (maxillary left central incisor). Straumann PURE (4.1 × 10 mm) Ceramic implant was placed. Three months post-surgery, the soft tissue architecture has been achieved and stabilized, and the healing was satisfactory around the zirconia implant and provisional restoration. The final layered zirconia crown was fabricated. A 2-step cementation technique was used to minimize the excess cement during the final delivery of the crown. After delivery of the final restoration, the patient was followed after 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.

German S3 guideline on the use of dental ceramic implants.

PURPOSE: Based on the excellent long-term data, dental implants made of titanium are considered the international implantological standard for replacing missing teeth. However, ceramic implants made of zirconia (ZrO2) have experienced a renaissance in the last 15 years due to constant innovations in materials and products, with material properties and soft tissue- and osseointegration behavior comparable to those of titanium. However, one limitation concerning ceramic implants is the lack of reliable long-term data, especially in the case of two-piece implant systems. As there is an increasing demand for ceramic implants from practitioners and patients, the German Society for Implantology (DGI) has decided to develop a guideline on the use of dental ceramic implants at the highest available evidence level with the involvement of experts in this field. METHODS: Statements and recommendations were prepared after conducting a systematic literature search and an independent assessment process involving the relevant clinical literature from 2008 to 2021. The adopted recommendations and statements are summarized in this guideline. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It confirms the feasible use of one-piece zirconia implants as an addendum/alternative to titanium implants. No final conclusion regarding the application of two-piece ceramic implant systems could be drawn on the basis of the existing data, thus its use can only be recommended after the patient has been informed in detail about the lack of long-term clinical data.

Zirconia vs. Titanium Dental Implants: Primary Stability In-Vitro Analysis.

The present experimental trial uses two types of dental implants, one made of titanium (Ti6Al4V) and the other one of zirconia (ZrO2), but both of identical design, to compare their stability and micro-movements values under load. One of each type of implant (n = 42) was placed into 21 cow ribs, recording the insertion torque and the resonance frequency using a specific transducer. Subsequently, a prosthetic crown made of PMMA was screwed onto each of the implants in the sample. They were then subjected to a static compression load on the vestibular cusp of the crown. The resulting micromovements were measured. The zirconia implants obtained a higher mean of both IT and RFA when compared with those of titanium, with statistically significant differences in both cases (p = 0.0483 and p = 0.0296). However, the micromovement values when load was applied were very similar for both types, with the differences between them (p = 0.3867) not found to be statistically significant. The results show that zirconia implants have higher implant stability values than titanium implants. However, the fact that there are no differences in micromobility values implies that caution should be exercised when applying clinical protocols for zirconia based on RFA, which only has evidence for titanium.

Fractal analysis at varying locations of clinically failed zirconia dental implants.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have shown that the fracture toughness of ceramics can be determined from the fractal dimensions (D) of their fracture surfaces and that the surface should be leveled to obtain an accurate D measurement. This study was to determine the effects of leveling operations and distance from the failure origin on the D values. METHODS: Twelve clinically failed zirconia implants from four different manufacturers: Axis Biodental (n=7), Z-Systems (n=3), Straumann (n=1), and Swiss Dental Solutions (n=1) were obtained from one of the authors and thoroughly cleaned. Epoxy replicas were made of three locations along the crack path in the center region of each fracture surface (near origin (O), hackle (H), and near compression curl (CC)) using a light body polyvinyl siloxane impression material. Surfaces were scanned in ScanAsyst mode with a scan size of 5µm×5µm and a scan rate of 0.592Hz using the atomic force microscope. The surface scans were then leveled using 1st order flattening operation in the AFM analysis software. The height data before and after the operation were imported into a custom MathCAD script, and FRACTALS software was used to determine the D value by Minkowski Cover algorithm, which was shown previously to be the algorithm with the highest precision. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test, two-way repeated-measures ANOVA, and one-way repeated-measures ANOVA were performed as detailed below. RESULTS: The data were not normally distributed (S-W p≤0.05), so a non-parametric repeated measures test (Wilcoxon signed-rank test) was selected. The median D values before and after leveling were 2.161 and 2.174, respectively. There was a significant difference before and after leveling (p<0.001). The two-way repeated-measures ANOVA showed no significant difference among the D values for different implant brands (p=0.66) and scanning locations on the fracture surface (p=0.83). After eliminating the implant brand as a factor, the data passed normality and equal variance tests (S-W p=0.88, BF p=0.15). The mean D values and standard deviations from the three locations (O, H, CC) were 2.183±0.031, 2.179±0.024, and 2.175±0.018, respectively. One-way repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant effect of scanning location (p=0.74). SIGNIFICANCE: The leveling operation successfully removed the tilt without decreasing surface tortuosity, as it increased the D values significantly. The fractal dimension was the same at the three locations on the fracture surfaces. This means that hackle and compression curl regions can be used to determine fracture toughness when the failure origin has been lost.

Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long-term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants.

BACKGROUND: Dental implants made of zirconia ceramics experienced a renaissance in the past years. However, there is still a lack in reliable long-term clinical data. PURPOSE: Aim of the present prospective clinical study was to analyze the dental implants made from zirconia, regarding their clinical performance compared to natural teeth (control). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-three zirconia implants in 28 adults were analyzed after 7.8 years of integration. Approximal plaque index (API), sulcus bleeding index (SBI), probing pocket depth (PPD), probing attachment level (PAL), and creeping or recession (CR/REC) of the mucosa/gingiva were analyzed. Changes in the marginal bone level (MBL) have been determined by comparing radiographs recorded immediately after implant placement and at the follow-up investigation. Furthermore, the pink esthetic score (PES), Periotest values (PTV), microbial colonization of the implant/dental sulcus fluid, and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: The survival rate of zirconia implants was 100%, however one implant presented a profound peri-implantitis, resistant to therapies. No statistical significance was observed between implants and teeth regarding SBI and PAL. Statistical significance was detected regarding API and CR/REC with significantly less plaque accumulation and recession in the study group. Significantly higher values for PPD were obvious in the zirconia implant group. PES of 9 ± 2.7 indicate a rather average esthetic result. Analysis of MBL revealed a mean peri-implant bone resorption of 1.2 mm. Microbial analysis revealed a nonstatistically significant higher colonization of bacteria in the study group, whereas single bacteria species were detected in statistically significant higher amounts. CONCLUSION: The investigated one-piece zirconia dental implants presented favorable long-term clinical results, comparable to natural teeth (SBI and PAL), and, regarding adhesion of plaque and creeping attachment (CR/REC), even superior. The microbial investigation revealed a shift in peri-implant colonization around zirconia implants over years, mainly without clinical effect on peri-implantitis.

Zirconia dental implants: A clinical and radiographic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: Limited clinical evidence has been reported in dental literature regarding zirconia dental implants. The aim of the present retrospective consecutive case series was to evaluate the clinical outcome of zirconia dental implants with 1 to 5 years of follow-up. CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS: The clinical outcome of 24 implants in 12 consecutive patients (male 5, female 7) with a mean age of 55 years (range 27-86) is reported. Radiographic crestal bone level was assessed by the use of "ImageJ" software program. Gingival and plaque indices were recorded at baseline and latest follow-up. CONCLUSION: The overall success rate of zirconia implants was 92%. Within the limitations of the present clinical evaluation, zirconia implants provided excellent clinical results and esthetic outcomes. A mean periimplant bone loss of 0.3 mm was measured in 33.3% of the implants and 66.7% were not affected by radiographic detectable periimplant bone loss. Two implants in two patients failed. Low gingival and plaque indices were predominant values for both interim and final restorations. The apparent less affinity to plaque accumulation may favor soft tissue health around zirconia dental implants and decrease the risk of inflammation or infection. Zirconia dental implant merits further investigation. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Zirconia dental implants are emerging as an option in clinical practice of implant dentistry providing stable clinical results and esthetic outcomes.

Immediate Placement of Zirconia Implants in Teeth with Periapical Lesions: A Case Report.

This case report records the replacement of two failed endodontically treated mandibular molars with one piece zirconia implants in a patient with metal hypersensitivity. The two molars were atraumatically extracted and curetted to remove any remnants of a periapical granuloma. Immediate implant placement with primary stability was achieved using one piece WhiteSky® Bredent zirconia implants which were restored after four months with a zirconia crown. One year follow up revealed successful osseointegration with optimal form and function.