Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus Reduces Workloads in Labor Analgesia: A Single Center's Experience.

Background and Objectives: Labor epidural analgesia can be maintained through programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB), continuous epidural infusion (CEI), or patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). Our department changed from CEI+PCEA to PIEB+PCEA as the maintenance method. The higher hourly dose setting in the current regimen brought to our concern that side effects would increase with proportional staff workloads. This study aimed to investigate the validity of our proposal that PIEB+PCEA may function as a feasible tool in reducing the amount of work in the obstetrics anesthesia units. Materials and methods: This 2-year retrospective review included parturients with vaginal deliveries under epidural analgesia. We compared the staff burden before and after the switch from CEI (6 mL/h, PCEA 6 mL lockout 15 min, group A) to PIEB (8 mL/h, PCEA 8 mL lockout 10 min, group B). The primary outcome was the difference of proportion of parturients requiring unscheduled visits between groups. Side effects and labor and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: Of the 694 parturients analyzed, the proportion of those requiring unscheduled visits were significantly reduced in group B (20.8% vs. 27.7%, chi-square test, p = 0.033). The multivariate logistic regression showed that PIEB was associated with fewer unscheduled visits than CEI (OR = 0.53, 95% CI [0.36-0.80], p < 0.01). Group B exhibited a significantly lower incidence of asymmetric blockade, as well as motor blockade. In nulliparous subjects, obstetric anal sphincter injury occurred less frequently when PIEB+PCEA was used. Significantly more multiparous women experienced vacuum extraction delivery in group B than in group A, and they had a longer second stage of labor. Conclusions: The PIEB+PCEA protocol in our study reduced workloads in labor epidural analgesia as compared to CEI+PCEA, despite that a higher dose of analgesics was administered. Future studies are warranted to investigate the effect of manipulating the PIEB settings on the labor outcomes.

Continuous Ambulatory Delivery Device Use for Patients Managed by an Inpatient Palliative Care Team.

BACKGROUND: The use of Patient Controlled Analgesia (PCA) via a Continuous Ambulatory Delivery Device (CADD) is a common and effective means of pain and symptom management for hospitalized patients with a malignancy. Studies exploring the indications for starting such a device for hospitalized inpatients referred to inpatient palliative care teams are limited. AIM: This retrospective chart review aims to explore indications, timing of initiation, and barriers to the use of a CADD. METHODS: Over a six month period, during daily inpatient palliative care consult team rounds, patients who required a CADD were enrolled in this study. Sixty-one adult patients were identified who required a pump for symptom control. The team's database sheets were used to capture patient demographics. RESULTS: The main reasons for initiating a Continuous Ambulatory Delivery Device in the above setting included: lack of efficacy of oral opioids and to increase patient autonomy of their pain management. Approximately 20% of patients required transfer to another unit that could accommodate the CADD. The median length of stay for these patients was 13 days, with a median length of half a day for a pump to be started. CONCLUSIONS: This initial study provides the Palliative Care Consult Team with information on the indications for the use of a CADD. The lack of universal access to a CADD in various areas of our hospital due to differences in departmental protocols may compromise good symptom management and patient safety. These results strengthen the argument that the existing hospital policy requires revamping to improve CADD access. A CADD has been shown to provide hospitalized patients, with a malignancy, with timely access to effective symptom management, and in turn, reducing their length of stay in hospital. These findings will help inform this organization's CADD policy and support the need to broaden access to this device.

Outcomes in patients with fractured ribs: middle aged at same risk of complications as the elderly.

AIMS: Rib fractures occur in up to 10% of hospitalised trauma patients and are the most common type of clinically significant blunt injury to the thorax. There is strong evidence that elderly patients have worse outcomes compared with younger patients. Evolving evidence suggests adverse outcomes start at a younger age. The aim of this study was to explore the effect of age on outcomes in patients with rib fractures in Northland, New Zealand. METHOD: A two-year retrospective study of patients admitted to any Northland District Health Board hospital with one or more radiologically proven rib fracture was performed. Patients with an abbreviated injury scale score >2 in the head or abdomen were excluded. The study population was stratified by age into three groups: >65, 45 to 65 and <45 years old. RESULTS: 170 patients met study inclusion criteria. Patients <45 had a significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) and lower rates of pneumonia compared to patients 45 and older, despite a higher Injury Severity Score and pulmonary contusion rate. There was no difference seen between groups in rates of intubation, ICU admission, mortality, empyema or acute respiratory distress syndrome. CONCLUSION: This study found higher rates of pneumonia and an increased LOS in patients 45 and older despite their lower overall injury severity when compared to patients under 45. Patients aged 45-64 had outcomes similar to patients >65. Future clinical pathways and guidelines for patients with rib fractures should consider incorporating a younger age than 65 in risk stratification algorithms.

Effect of preoperative versus postoperative use of transversus abdominis plane block with plain 0.25 % bupivacaine on postoperative opioid use: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery protocols optimize pain control via multimodal approaches that include transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of preoperative vs. postoperative plain 0.25 % bupivacaine TAP block on postoperative opioid use after colorectal surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study comparing postoperative opioid use in patients who received preoperative (n = 240) vs. postoperative (n = 22) plain 0.25 % bupivacaine TAP blocks. The study was conducted in a single tertiary care institution and included patients who underwent colorectal resections between August 2018 and January 2020. The primary outcome of the study was postoperative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included operative details, length of stay, reoperation, and readmission rates. RESULTS: Patients who received postoperative plain 0.25 % bupivacaine TAP blocks were less likely to require postoperative patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) (59.1 % vs. 83.3 %; p = 0.012) and opioid medications on discharge (6.4 % vs. 16.9 %; p = 0.004) relative to patients who received preoperative TAP. When needed, a significantly smaller amount of opioid was prescribed to the postoperative group (84.5 vs. 32.0 mg, p = 0.047). No significant differences were noted in the duration of postoperative PCA use, amount of oral opioid use, and length of stay. CONCLUSIONS: Plain 0.25 % bupivacaine TAP block administered postoperatively was associated with significantly lower need for postoperative PCA and discharge opioid medications. The overall hospital length of stay was not affected by the timing of TAP block. Because of the limited sample size in this study, conclusions cannot be generalized, and more research will be required.

Time- and dose-dependent correlations between patient-controlled epidural analgesia and intrapartum maternal fever.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the relationship between intrapartum maternal fever and the duration and dosage of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). METHODS: This observational study included 159 pregnant women who voluntarily accepted PCEA. During labor, patients with body temperature ≥ 38 °C were classified into the Fever group, (n = 42), and those with body temperature < 38 °C were classified into the No-fever group (n = 117). The outcome measures included the duration of PCEA, number of PCEA, and total PCEA amount. Body temperature and parturient variables, including interpartum fever status and the duration of any fever were monitored. RESULTS: The total PCEA duration and total PCEA amount in the Fever group were significantly higher than the corresponding values in the No-fever group (both, p < 0.05). The duration of fever was weakly correlated with the duration of PCEA (R2 = 0.08) and the total PCEA amount (R2 = 0.05) (both, p < 0.05). The total and effective PCEA were higher in the Fever group than in the No-fever group (both, p < 0.05). The total PCEA duration and total PCEA amount were positively correlated with the incidence of fever (both, p < 0.05). The diagnostic cutoff value for fever was 383 min, with a sensitivity of 78.6% and specificity of 57.3%. The mean temperature-time curves showed that parturients who developed fever had a steeper rise in temperature. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that there were weak time- and dose-dependent correlations between PCEA and maternal fever during delivery. A total PCEA duration exceeding 6.3 h was associated with an increase in the duration of maternal intrapartum fever.

Evaluation of Outcomes Before and After Implementation of a Standardized Postoperative Care Pathway in Pediatric Posterior Spinal Fusion Patients.

BACKGROUND: Standardized pathways decrease variability and improve outcomes and safety. PURPOSE: The article aims to evaluate outcomes of a standardized postoperative care pathway compared with individual surgeon preference. METHODS: A review of patients prestandardization and poststandardization was performed. Patients between the ages of 10-21 years with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (ICD-9 code 737.30) admitted to the hospital for posterior spinal fusion (CPT code 22630) were included in the study. The prestandardization group (25 patients) was enrolled from April 1, 2010, through March 30, 2011, and the poststandardization group (25 patients) from April 1, 2014, to March 30, 2015. Exclusion criteria were renal disease, epilepsy, neurological disorder, or postoperative complications that led to change in routine care including ileus or fever greater than 102 °F. Data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, with significance set at p < .001. RESULTS: The length of stay (p = .0166), time to ambulation (p < .0001), patient-controlled analgesia use (p < .0001), and postoperative time to resumption of regular diet (p < .0001) were all significantly decreased in the poststandardization group. There were no complications or readmissions in either group. CONCLUSION: The standardized pathway resulted in shorter length of stay, decreased narcotic use, decreased time to regular diet, and decreased time to ambulation with no increase in complication rates.

Efectividad de la analgesia controlada por el paciente en el dolor agudo y crónico después de cirugía cardiaca: estudio prospectivo / Effectiveness of patient-controlled analgesia in acute and chronic pain after cardiac surgery: a prospective study

INTRODUCCIÓN: La intensidad del dolor postoperatorio moderado-intenso después de una cirugía cardiaca (CC) varía, según los estudios, de un 45 a un 85 %. No existe evidencia sobre cuál es la pauta analgésica óptima en el postoperatorio de estos pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la efectividad de la aplicación de un protocolo analgésico multimodal, basado en la analgesia controlada por el paciente (PCA) con morfina, en pacientes sometidos a CC con circulación extracorpórea (CEC). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo de todos los pacientes sometidos a CC con CEC, durante los primeros 3 días del postoperatorio (DPO). Se incluyeron 102 pacientes en dos periodos, noviembre de 2016, con analgesia convencional (AC) y enero-febrero de 2017 con PCA. RESULTADOS: El dolor en reposo se mantuvo controlado (mediana escala numérica < 3). Se registró un 27 % de pacientes con dolor moderado e intenso. No hubo diferencias en la intensidad del dolor entre los pacientes con AC y los de PCA. El grupo de PCA precisó menos analgesia de rescate (63 vs. 44 %, p = 0,0487). La incidencia de dolor crónico postquirúrgico fue de un 39 % a los tres meses y un 3 % al año. El dolor y la ansiedad preoperatorios se correlacionaron con la intensidad del dolor dinámico (r = 0,287, p = 0,03). CONCLUSIONES: La PCA con opioides a demanda y analgesia multimodal es una alternativa efectiva después de la CC. Se obtiene un buen control del dolor postoperatorio sin incrementar los efectos adversos y precisando menos analgesia de rescate administrada por enfermería

INTRODUCTION: The intensity of postoperative moderate/intense pain after cardiac surgery (CC), varies according to the different studies, from 45 % to 85 %. There is no evidence about which is the optimal analgesic regimen in the postoperative period. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the application of a multimodal analgesic protocol, based on patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation (ECC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study of all patients undergoing CS with ECC, during the first 3 days postoperatively. There were included 102 patients in two periods, first, in November 2016 with conventional analgesia and second, in January - February 2017 with PCA. RESULTS: The pain at rest was controlled (median numerical scale <3). An average of 27 % of moderate and intense pain was recorded. There was no difference in pain intensity between patients with CA and those with PCA. The PCA group required less rescue analgesia in the first postoperative days (63 % vs. 44 % p = 0.0487). The incidence of Post-surgical Chronic Pain was 39 % at three months, and 3 % at one year. There was a correlation between preoperative pain and anxiety with the intensity of the dynamic pain (r = 0.287, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: PCA with on-demand opioids and multimodal analgesia is an effective alternative after cardiac surgery. Good control of postoperative pain is obtained without increasing adverse effects, and requiring less rescue analgesia administered by the nursing staff

Erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for breast surgery compared to IV-morphine: A randomized controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Erector spinae plane (ESP) block is a novel regional anesthesia technique and gaining importance for postoperative pain management. Since it was first described, the clinicians wonder if this new simple technique can replace paravertebral block (PVB). We aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effect of ESP block and PVB with a control group in breast surgeries. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Operating room. PATIENTS: Seventy-five ASA I-II patients aged 25-65, who were scheduled to go under elective unilateral breast surgery for breast cancer were included to the study. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into three groups as ESP, PVB, and Control group. Ultrasound (US) guided ESP block and PVB with 20 ml 0.25% bupivacaine was done preoperatively to the patients according to their groups. MEASUREMENTS: All patients were provided with iv patient-controlled analgesia device for postoperative analgesia. Morphine consumptions and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for pain were recorded at 1st, 6th, 12th and 24th hours postoperatively. MAIN RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference between ESP and Control groups (p < 0,001) and between PVB and Control groups (p < 0,001), while there was no difference between ESP and PVB groups (p > 0,05) for 24-hour morphine consumptions. There was a significant difference between PVB and Control groups for NRS at postoperative 1st and 6th hour (p = 0.018 and p = 0.027 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that US guided ESP block and PVB provided adequate analgesia in patients undergoing breast surgery and have an opioid sparing effect by reducing morphine consumption. Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03480958.

Evaluation of ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section: A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Cesarean Delivery (CD) is a commonly performed obstetric procedure. Adding a regional anesthesia technique to multimodal analgesia in CD, may improve the quality of postoperative analgesia. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of Transversalis Fascia Plane Block (TFPB) for postoperative analgesia management in CD. DESIGN: Blinded, prospective, randomized study. SETTING: Postoperative recovery room & ward, tertiary university hospital, Istanbul, Turkey, PATIENTS: Seventy-five patients (ASA II-III) scheduled to undergo Cesarean delivery were recruited. Following exclusion, 70 patients were randomized into two equal groups (block and control group). INTERVENTIONS: Standard multimodal analgesia (routine paracetamol and tramadol PCA in addition to diclophenac sodium as rescue analgesia) was performed in Group C while TFPB block was also performed in the intervention (TFPB) group. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was tramadol consumption within the first 24 h. The secondary outcome was Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores during rest and movement/coughing. MAIN RESULTS: Tramadol consumption in the first 24 h was 175 ±â€¯72.32 mg in the control and 101.42 ±â€¯51.45 mg in the TFPB group (p < 0.05). NRS was lower in Group TFPB during the first 3 h and at the 12th hour. There was no difference in NRS scores at other hours. CONCLUSION: Bilateral ultrasound guided TFPB leads to effective analgesia and a decrease in analgesia requirement in first 24 h in patients undergoing CD.

A multicentre, prospective, observational cohort study of variation in practice in perioperative analgesia strategies in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery (the LapCoGesic study).

INTRODUCTION: Enhanced recovery programmes are established as an essential part of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Optimal pain management is central to the success of an enhanced recovery programme and is acknowledged to be an important patient reported outcome measure. A variety of analgesia strategies are employed in elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery ranging from patient-controlled analgesia to local anaesthetic wound infiltration catheters. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal analgesia strategy in this cohort of patients. The LapCoGesic study aimed to explore differences in analgesia strategies employed for patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery and to assess whether this variation in practice has an impact on patient-reported and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection was undertaken over a two-month period. The primary outcome measure was postoperative pain scores at 24 hours. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS version 22. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery were included in the study. Thoracic epidural was used in 4 (3.9%) patients, spinal diamorphine in 56 (54.4%) patients and patient-controlled analgesia in 77 (74.8%) patients. The use of thoracic epidural and spinal diamorphine were associated with lower pain scores on day 1 postoperatively (P < 0.05). The use of patient-controlled analgesia was associated with significantly higher postoperative pain scores and pain severity. DISCUSSION: Postoperative pain is managed in a variable manner in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, which has an impact on patient reported outcomes of pain scores and pain severity.

Factors Related to the Consumption of Patient-Controlled Postoperative Analgesics in Korea: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Pain is the most common symptom among inpatients, and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is one of the effective pain management methods for postoperative patients. AIMS: This study aimed to identify the predictors of analgesic consumption in patients using postoperative PCA. DESIGN: As part of a descriptive and retrospective study, data were collected from the nursing records of 662 patients who underwent postoperative intravenous PCA for three days after surgery at one medical institution. Stepwise multiple regression analyses were conducted to select significant variables that could predict total analgesic consumption. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that surgical sites, physical characteristics, donation surgery, and postoperative pain significantly influenced total analgesic consumption (POD 3, R2 = 53%, p < .001). CONCLUSION: The present findings provide valuable information for the effective postoperative administration of intravenous PCA and may contribute to the development of customized patient-centered pain management intervention by nurses through more accurate predictions of analgesic consumption based on individual characteristics, the surgical site, and the type of surgery-especially organ donation surgery. This study could contribute to improving preventive interventions by general nurses as well as pain control nurses by enabling more accurate predictions of patients' pain and consumption of self-controlled analgesic agents based on personal characteristics and surgical characteristics.

Analgesic effect of the ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to transmuscular quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Quadratus lumborum block (QLB) is an effective analgesia that lowers opioid consumption after lower abdominal and hip surgeries. The subcostal approach to transmuscular QLB is a novel technique that can provide postoperative analgesia by blocking more dermatomes. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and viability of subcostal approach to QLB after laparoscopic nephrectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients who underwent laparoscopic nephrectomy were randomly divided into the subcostal approach to QLB group (QLB group, n = 30) and the control group (C group, n = 30). All patients underwent ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to QLB in an ipsilateral parasagittal oblique plane at the L1-L2 level. The QLB group received 0.4 cc/kg of 0.3% ropivacaine, and the C group received 0.4 cc/kg of 0.9% saline. Postoperatively, a patient-controlled intravenous analgesic pump with sufentanil was attached to all the patients. The primary outcome was sufentanil consumption within the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes included the Ramsey sedation scale (RSS) scores and Bruggemann comfort scale (BCS) scores 6 h (T1), 12 h (T2), and 24 h (T3) after surgery, intraoperative remifentanil consumption, number of patients requiring rescue analgesia, time to recovery of intestinal function, mobilization time after surgery, and presence of side effects. RESULTS: Sufentanil consumption within the first 24 h after surgery was significantly lower in the QLB group than in the C group (mean [standard deviation]: 34.1 [9.9] µg vs 42.1 [11.6] µg, P = .006). The RSS scores did not differ between the two groups, and the BCS scores of the QLB group at T1 and T2 time points was significantly higher than those of the C group(P<0.05). The consumption of remifentanil intraoperatively and the number of patients requiring rescue analgesia were significantly lower in the QLB group (P<0.05). Time to recovery of intestinal function and mobilization time after surgery were significantly earlier in the QLB group (P<0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in the QLB group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The ultrasound-guided subcostal approach to QLB is an effective analgesic technique in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy as it reduces the consumption of sufentanil postoperatively. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1800020296 0 (Prospective registered). Initial registration date was 22/12/2018.

Sufentanil during anesthetic induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial / Sufentanil durante a indução da anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil: ensaio clínico randômico

Abstract Background Postoperative pain represents an important concern when remifentanil is used for total intravenous anesthesia because of its ultrashort half-life. Longer acting opioids, such as sufentanil, have been used during induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia as a means to overcome this shortcoming. However, the effectiveness and safety of such strategy still lacks evidence from randomized clinical trials. Hence, we aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of a single dose of sufentanil administered during the induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia. Methods Forty patients, scheduled for elective open abdominal surgery, were randomized to receive remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia with or without a single dose of sufentanil upon induction. We assessed the postoperative morphine consumption administered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Self-reported pain scores and the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, agitation, somnolence and respiratory depression were also assessed up to 2 days after surgery. Results The mean difference between the sufentanil and control groups regarding morphine consumption in the post-anesthetic care unit and at 12, 24 and 48 h after surgery were -7.2 mg (95%CI: -12.5 to -2.1, p < 0.001), -3.9 mg (95%CI: -11.9 to 4.7, p = 0.26), -0.6 mg (95%CI: (-12.7 to 12.7, p = 0.80), and -1.8 mg (95%CI: (-11.6 to 15.6, p = 0.94), respectively. Neither self-reported pain nor the incidence of adverse events were significantly different between groups at any time point. Conclusion Our findings suggest that the administration of sufentanil during induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with decreased early postoperative opioid consumption.

Resumo Justificativa A dor pós-operatória é uma grande preocupação quando o remifentanil é usado para anestesia intravenosa total devido à sua meia-vida ultracurta. Os opioides de ação mais longa, como o sufentanil, têm sido usados durante a indução de anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil como um meio de superar essa deficiência. Porém, a eficácia e segurança de tal estratégia ainda precisam de evidências advindas de ensaios clínicos randômicos. Portanto, objetivamos avaliar a eficácia analgésica e a segurança pós-operatória de uma dose única de sufentanil administrada durante a indução de anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil. Métodos Quarenta pacientes eletivamente agendados para cirurgia abdominal aberta foram randomizados para receber anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil, com ou sem uma dose única de sufentanil, após a indução da anestesia. Avaliamos o consumo de morfina no pós-operatório, administrado através de uma bomba de analgesia controlada pelo paciente. Os escores de dor autorrelatados e a ocorrência de náusea, vômito, prurido, agitação, sonolência e depressão respiratória também foram avaliados até dois dias após a cirurgia. Resultados A diferença média entre os grupos sufentanil e controle em relação ao consumo de morfina em sala de recuperação pós-anestesia e após 12, 24 e 48 horas da cirurgia foi de -7,2 mg (IC 95%: -12,5 a -2,1, p < 0,001), -3,9 mg (IC 95%: -11,9 a 4,7, p = 0,26), -0,6 mg (IC 95%: (-12,7 a 12,7, p = 0,80) e -1,8 mg (IC 95%: -11,6 para 15,6, p = 0,94), respectivamente. Não houve diferença significativa tanto nos escores de dor autorrelatados, quanto na incidência de eventos adversos entre os grupos. Conclusão Nossos achados sugerem que a administração de sufentanil durante a indução de anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil está associada à redução do consumo de opioides no pós-operatório imediato.

[Sufentanil during anesthetic induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial]. / Sufentanil durante a indução da anestesia intravenosa total à base de remifentanil: ensaio clínico randômico.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pain represents an important concern when remifentanil is used for total intravenous anesthesia because of its ultrashort half-life. Longer acting opioids, such as sufentanil, have been used during induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia as a means to overcome this shortcoming. However, the effectiveness and safety of such strategy still lacks evidence from randomized clinical trials. Hence, we aimed to assess the postoperative analgesic efficacy and safety of a single dose of sufentanil administered during the induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia. METHODS: Forty patients, scheduled for elective open abdominal surgery, were randomized to receive remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia with or without a single dose of sufentanil upon induction. We assessed the postoperative morphine consumption administered through a patient-controlled analgesia pump. Self-reported pain scores and the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, pruritus, agitation, somnolence and respiratory depression were also assessed up to 2 days after surgery. RESULTS: The mean difference between the sufentanil and control groups regarding morphine consumption in the post-anesthetic care unit and at 12, 24 and 48h after surgery were -7.2mg (95%CI: -12.5 to -2.1, p<0.001), -3.9mg (95%CI: -11.9 to 4.7, p=0.26), -0.6mg (95%CI: (-12.7 to 12.7, p=0.80), and -1.8mg (95%CI: (-11.6 to 15.6, p=0.94), respectively. Neither self-reported pain nor the incidence of adverse events were significantly different between groups at any time point. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that the administration of sufentanil during induction of remifentanil-based total intravenous anesthesia is associated with decreased early postoperative opioid consumption.

Labor epidural analgesia onset time and subsequent analgesic requirements: a prospective observational single-center cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 and 120 min after initiation. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational study of nulliparous women receiving lumbar epidural analgesia (initial bolus 15 mL bupivacaine 0.1% with fentanyl 3.33 µg/mL), followed by patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA). The measured variable was lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (time to pain numerical rating score ≤3). Secondary outcomes were pain score at 60 and 120 min and at full dilatation; and analgesic requirements through the labor. RESULTS: One-hundred-and-five women were eligible for analysis. There was a significant correlation between lumbar epidural analgesia onset time and pain intensity at 60 min (Spearman's R2=0.286, P=0.003), but not at 120 min (R2=0.030, P=0.76). Women who requested more PCEA boluses during the first 120 min had a longer lumbar epidural analgesia onset time (R2=0.321, P=0.001) and reported higher pain scores at 60 min (R2=0.588, P <0.001) and at 120 min (R2=0.539, P <0.001). Women who reported higher pain scores at 60 min had more pain at 120 min (R2=0.47, P <0.001) and higher analgesic consumption during labor (R2=0.403, P <0.001). Women who were at a greater cervical dilatation at 60 and 120 min had higher pain scores at the same time point (R2=0.259, P=0.008 and R2=0.243, P=0.013 respectively). CONCLUSION: There was a correlation between the onset time of lumbar epidural analgesia during labor and the pain score 60 min later but this had disappeared by 120 min.

Efficacy of programmed intermittent bolus epidural analgesia in thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Continuous epidural infusion (CEI) has some disadvantages, such as increased local anesthetic consumption and limited area of anesthetic distribution. Programmed intermittent bolus (PIB) is a technique of epidural anesthesia in which boluses of local anesthetic are automatically injected into the epidural space. The usefulness of PIB in thoracic surgery remains unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacies of PIB epidural analgesia and CEI in patients undergoing thoracic surgery. METHODS: This randomized prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. The study included 42 patients, who were divided into CEI (n = 21) and PIB groups (n = 21). In the CEI group, patients received continuous infusion of the local anesthetic at a rate of 5.1 mL/90 min. In the PIB group, a pump delivered the local anesthetic at a dose of 5.1 mL every 90 min. The primary endpoints were the frequency of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and the total dose of local anesthetic until 36 h following surgery. Student's t-test, the chi-square test, and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: The mean number of PCA administrations and total amount of local anesthetic were not significantly different between the two groups up to 24 h following surgery. However, the mean number of PCA administrations and total amount of local anesthetic at 24-36 h after surgery were significantly lower in the PIB group than in the CEI group (median [lower-upper quartiles]: 0 [0-2.5] vs. 2 [0.5-5], P = 0.018 and 41 [41-48.5] vs. 47 [43-56], P = 0.035, respectively). Hypotension was significantly more frequent in the PIB group than in the CEI group at 0-12 h and 12-24 h (3.3% vs. 0.5%, P = 0.018 and 7.9% vs. 0%, P = 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSION: PIB can reduce local anesthetic consumption in thoracic surgery. However, it might result in adverse events, such as hypotension. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This randomized prospective study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB No. 15-9-06) of the Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, and was registered in the clinical trials database UMIN ( ID 000019904 ) on 24 November 2015. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

The Effect of Patient-Controlled Oral Analgesia for Acute Abdominal Pain after Discharge.

BACKGROUND: During hospitalization, patients who were admitted with acute abdominal pain must be prepared to care for themselves at home after discharge to continue established treatment, promote recovery, and avoid readmission. AIMS: Our aim was to investigate the quality of pain management after discharge, when patient-controlled oral analgesia was compared with standard care for patients admitted to hospital with acute abdominal pain. The primary outcome measures were pain intensity and patient perception of care. The secondary outcome measures were pain interference with activity, affective experiences, side effects, and use of analgesics. DESIGN: A questionnaire study measuring the effect of an intervention on patient-controlled oral analgesics. SETTINGS: An emergency department and a surgical department in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to hospital with acute abdominal pain. METHODS: A pre- and postintervention study was conducted in an emergency department and a surgical department with three subunits. Data were collected using a Danish modified Revised American Pain Society Patient Outcome Questionnaire with five subscales (scale 0-10) completed in weeks 1 and 4 after discharge. RESULTS: In total, 117 patients were included. The median scores at week 1 and week 4 in the control and intervention groups were, respectively, 2/1 and 1/0 on the pain subscale (p = .11/.16), 3/0 and 3/0 on the activity subscale (p = .19/.80), 1/0 and 0/0 on the emotional subscale (p = .02/.72), 1/0 and 1/0 on the side effect subscale (p = .95/.99), and 8/5 and 7/7 on the patient perception subscale (p = .35/.49). There was no significant difference in the use of analgesics at week 1. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-controlled oral analgesia during the hospital stay did not improve the quality of pain management after discharge.