Nasal cannula and face mask gas flow rates when connecting to the Y-piece of the anesthesia circuit.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between the delivered gas flows via nasal cannulas and face masks and the set gas flow and the breathing circuit pressure when connecting to the Y-adapter of the anesthesia breathing circuit and using the oxygen blender on the anesthesia machine, relevant to surgery when there is concern for causing a fire. The flow rates that are delivered at various flow rates and circuit pressures have not been previously studied. DESIGN: Laboratory investigation. SETTING: Academic medical center. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: The gas flows from each of 3 anesthesia machines from the same manufacturer were systematically increased from 1 to 15 L/min with changes to the adjustable pressure limiting valve to maintain 0-40 cm water pressure in the breathing circuit for nasal cannula testing and at 20-30 cm water circuit pressure for face masks. MEASUREMENTS: The delivered gas flows to the cannula were determined using a float-ball flowmeter for combinations of set gas flows and circuit pressures after connecting the cannula tubing to the Y-piece of the anesthesia circuit via a tracheal tube adapter. Decreasing the supply tubing length on the delivered flow rates was evaluated. MAIN RESULTS: There was a highly linear relationship between the anesthesia circuit pressure and the delivered nasal cannula flow rates, with 0 flow observed when the APL valve was fully open (i.e., 0 cm water). However, even under maximum conditions (40 cm water and 15 L/min), the delivered nasal cannula flow rate was 3.5 L/min. Shortening the 6.5-ft cannula tubing increased the flow at 20 and 30 cm water by approximately 0.12 L/min/ft. The estimated FiO2 assuming a minute ventilation of 5 L/min and 30% FiO2 ranged from 21.7% to 27.0% at nasal cannula flow rates of 0.5 to 4.0 L/min. When using a face mask and the APL fully closed, delivered flow rates were 0.25 L/min less than the set flow rate between 1 and 3 L/min and equal to the set flow rate between 4 and 8 L/min. CONCLUSIONS: When using a nasal cannula adapted to the Y-piece of the anesthesia circuit, the delivery system is linearly dependent on the pressure in the circuit and uninfluenced by the flow rate set on the anesthesia machine. However, only modest flow rates (≤ 3.5 L/min) and a limited increase in the inspired FiO2 are possible when using this delivery method. When using a face mask and the anesthesia circuit, flow rates close to the set flow rate are possible with the APL valve fully closed. Patients scheduled for sedation for head and neck procedures with increased fire risk who require more than a marginal increase in the FiO2 to maintain an acceptable pulse oximetry saturation may need general anesthesia with tracheal intubation.

Reflection Versus Rebreathing for Administration of Sevoflurane During Minor Gynecological Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Contemporary anesthetic circle systems, when used at low fresh gas flows (FGF) to allow rebreathing of anesthetic, lack the ability for rapid dose titration. The small-scale anesthetic reflection device Anaesthetic Conserving Device (50mL Version; AnaConDa-S) permits administration of volatile anesthetics with high-flow ventilators. We compared washin, washout, and sevoflurane consumption using AnaConDa-S versus a circle system with low and minimal FGF. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing breast surgery were randomized to receive 0.5 minimal alveolar concentration (MAC) sevoflurane with AnaConDa-S (21 patients, reflection group) or with a circle system (low flow: FGF = 0.2 minute ventilation [V'E], 9 patients; or minimal flow: 0.1 V'E, 10 patients). In the reflection group, syringe pump boluses were given for priming and washin; to simulate an open system, the FGF of the anesthesia ventilator was set to 18 L·min-1 with the soda lime removed. In the other groups, the FGF was increased for washin (1 V'E for 8 minutes) and washout (3 V'E). For all patients, tidal volume was 7 mL·kg-1 and the respiratory rate adjusted to ensure normoventilation. Analgesia was attained with remifentanil 0.3 µg·kg-1·min-1. Sevoflurane consumption was compared between the reflection group and the low- and minimal-flow groups, respectively, using a post hoc test (Fisher Least Significant Difference). To compare washin and washout (half-life), the low- and minimal-flow groups were combined. RESULTS: Sevoflurane consumption was reduced in the reflection group (9.4 ± 2.0 vs 15.0 ± 3.5 [low flow, P < .001] vs 11.6 ± 2.3 mL·MAC h-1 [minimal flow, P = .02]); washin (33 ± 15 vs 49 ± 12 seconds, P = .001) and washout (28 ± 15 vs 55 ± 19 seconds, P < .001) times were also significantly shorter. CONCLUSIONS: In this clinical setting with short procedures, low anesthetic requirements, and low tidal volumes, AnaConDa-S decreased anesthetic consumption, washin, and washout times compared to a circle system.

Carbon Dioxide Absorption During Inhalation Anesthesia: A Modern Practice.

CO2 absorbents were introduced into anesthesia practice in 1924 and are essential when using a circle system to minimize waste by reducing fresh gas flow to allow exhaled anesthetic agents to be rebreathed. For many years, absorbent formulations consisted of calcium hydroxide combined with strong bases like sodium and potassium hydroxide. When Sevoflurane and Desflurane were introduced, the potential for toxicity (compound A and CO, respectively) due to the interaction of these agents with absorbents became apparent. Studies demonstrated that strong bases added to calcium hydroxide were the cause of the toxicity, but that by eliminating potassium hydroxide and reducing the concentration of sodium hydroxide to <2%, compound A and CO production is no longer a concern. As a result, CO2 absorbents have been developed that contain little or no sodium hydroxide. These CO2 absorbent formulations can be used safely to minimize anesthetic waste by reducing fresh gas flow to approach closed-circuit conditions. Although absorbent formulations have been improved, practices persist that result in unnecessary waste of both anesthetic agents and absorbents. While CO2 absorbents may seem like a commodity item, differences in CO2 absorbent formulations can translate into significant performance differences, and the choice of absorbent should not be based on unit price alone. A modern practice of inhalation anesthesia utilizing a circle system to greatest effect requires reducing fresh gas flow to approach closed-circuit conditions, thoughtful selection of CO2 absorbent, and changing absorbents based on inspired CO2.

Anesthesia Machine Failure: A Case Study.

This article examines successful management of an anesthesia machine failure with the Draeger (or Dräger) Apollo (Draeger Inc) anesthesia workstation. Approximately 45 minutes into the case, while the patient was under general anesthesia and mechanical ventilation, the anesthesia machine failed to achieve positive pressurization following a high-pressure alarm. Despite multiple maneuvers, the issue did not resolve until the machine was manually powered off and on at the main power switch. This case report emphasizes the importance of always having a backup means of patient ventilation and anesthesia administration.

Behavior of a dual closed-loop controller of propofol and remifentanil guided by the bispectral index for postoperative sedation of adult cardiac surgery patients: a preliminary open study.

A dual-loop controller permits the automated titration of propofol and remifentanil during anesthesia; it has never been used in intensive care after cardiac surgery. The goal of this preliminary study was to determine the efficacy of this controller to provide postoperative sedation in 19 adult cardiac surgery patients with a Bispectral Index target of 50. Results are presented as numbers (percentages) or medians [25th-75th percentiles]. The sedation period lasted 139 min [89-205] during which the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale was at - 5 and the Behavioral Pain Scale score at three points for all patients and observation times but one (82 out of 83 assessments). Sedation time in the range 40-60 for the Bispectral Index was 87% [57-95]; one patient had a period of electrical silence defined as Suppression Ratio at least > 10% for more than 60 s. The time between the end of infusions and tracheal extubation was 84 min [63-129]. The Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale was 0 [0-0], 0 [- 1 to 0], and 0 [0-0] respectively during the 3 h following extubation while the verbal numerical pain scores were 6 [4.5-7], 5 [4-6], and 2 [0-5]. Mean arterial pressure decreased during sedation requiring therapeutic interventions, mainly vascular filling in 15 (79%) patients. Automated sedation device was discontinued in two patients for hemodynamic instability. No patient had awareness of the postoperative sedation period. Dual closed-loop can provide postoperative sedation after cardiac surgery but the choice of the depth of sedation should take into account the risk of hypotension.

Hemodynamic stability of closed-loop anesthesia systems: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review investigates the effect of closed-loop anesthesia delivery on the maintenance of cardiovascular parameters. The specific challenges arise from the fact that many physiological variables used for the control of anesthetic delivery and maintenance of hemodynamic stability are regulated by the autonomic nervous system, which is subject to high inter-individual variability. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic database search (MEDLINE, EMBASE and Web of Science) was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines and the principles of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Identified articles were screened and studies that fulfilled the eligibility criteria using the PICO approach (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) were included in a random effects model to calculate weighted mean and 95% confidence intervals. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twenty studies (1402 subjects: 706 intervention and 696 control) were included in this review. Meta-analysis showed that closed-loop systems achieved longer duration of heart rate and MAP control, at 90.9% (95% CI: 90.0-91.8%) and 88.2% (95% CI: 87.4-89.0%) respectively, compared to the respective manual control group at 86.6% (95% CI: 85.1-88.0%) and 85.1% (95% CI: 84.3-86.0%). Subgroup analysis demonstrated better performance and faster recovery compared to the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the use of closed-loop systems for anesthetic delivery. Interpretation should take into account limitations, such as the large variations in the selected studies in the type of parameters used to measure outcomes. In summary, this review provides evidence supporting the importance of considering cardiovascular variables in the design of automated anesthetic delivery systems.

The Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Propofol Requirements During Anesthesia Administered by Bispectral Index-Guided Closed-Loop Anesthesia Delivery System: A Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist currently approved for continuous intensive care unit sedation, is being widely evaluated for its role as a potential anesthetic. The closed-loop anesthesia delivery system (CLADS) is a method to automatically administer propofol total intravenous anesthesia using bi-spectral index (BIS) feedback and attain general anesthesia (GA) steady state with greater consistency. This study assessed whether dexmedetomidine is effective in further lowering the propofol requirements for total intravenous anesthesia facilitated by CLADS. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 80 patients undergoing elective major laparoscopic/robotic surgery were randomly allocated to receive GA with propofol CLADS with or without the addition of dexmedetomidine. Quantitative reduction of propofol and quality of depth-of-anesthesia (primary objectives), intraoperative hemodynamics, incidence of postoperative adverse events (sedation, analgesia, nausea, and vomiting), and intraoperative awareness recall (secondary objectives) were analyzed. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant lowering of propofol requirement (by 15%) in the dexmedetomidine group for induction of anesthesia (dexmedetomidine group: mean ± standard deviation 0.91 ± 0.26 mg/kg; nondexmedetomidine group: 1.07 ± 0.23 mg/kg, mean difference: 0.163, 95% CI, 0.04-0.28; P = .01) and maintenance of GA (dexmedetomidine group: 3.25 ± 0.97 mg/kg/h; nondexmedetomidine group: 4.57 ± 1.21 mg/kg/h, mean difference: 1.32, 95% CI, 0.78-1.85; P < .001). The median performance error of BIS control, a measure of bias, was significantly lower in dexmedetomidine group (1% [-5.8%, 8%]) versus nondexmedetomidine group (8% [2%, 12%]; P = .002). No difference was found for anesthesia depth consistency parameters, including percentage of time BIS within ±10 of target (dexmedetomidine group: 79.5 [72.5, 85.3]; nondexmedetomidine group: 81 [68, 88]; P = .534), median absolute performance error (dexmedetomidine group: 12% [10%, 14%]; nondexmedetomidine group: 12% [10%, 14%]; P = .777), wobble (dexmedetomidine group: 10% [8%, 10%]; nondexmedetomidine group: 8% [6%, 10%]; P = .080), and global score (dexmedetomidine group: 25.2 [23.1, 35.8]; nondexmedetomidine group: 24.7 [20, 38.1]; P = .387). Similarly, there was no difference between the groups for percentage of time intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure remained within 20% of baseline. However, addition of dexmedetomidine to CLADS propofol increased the incidence of significant bradycardia (dexmedetomidine group: 14 [41.1%]; nondexmedetomidine group: 3 [9.1%]; P = .004), hypotension (dexmedetomidine group: 9 [26.5%]; nondexmedetomidine group: 2 [6.1%]; P = .045), and early postoperative sedation. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of dexmedetomidine to propofol administered by CLADS was associated with a consistent depth of anesthesia along with a significant decrease in propofol requirements, albeit with an incidence of hemodynamic depression and early postoperative sedation.

A novel cause of rebreathing carbon dioxide related to removed CLIC-seal on the Dräger Apollo© anesthesia machine.

We present a case report involving two sequential, surgically uneventful, laparoscopic cholecystectomies using the same anesthesia machine (Drager Apollo©) for which the level of inspired carbon dioxide was noted to be elevated following various diagnostic interventions including replacing the sodalime, increasing fresh gas flows, and a full inspection of equipment for malfunction. Eventually it was discovered that a rubber ring seal connecting the Dragersorb CLIC system© to the sodalime canister was inadvertently removed during the initial canister exchange resulting in an apparent bypassing of the absorbent and thus an inability of the exhaled gas to contact the sodalime. To our knowledge this is the first such description of this potential cause of elevated inspired carbon dioxide and should warrant consideration when other conventional interventions have failed.

Efficient application of volatile anaesthetics: total rebreathing or specific reflection?

The circle system has been in use for more than a 100 years, whereas the first clinical application of an anaesthetic reflector was reported just 15 years ago. Its functional basis relies on molecular sieves such as zeolite crystals or activated carbon. In a circle system, the breathing gas is rebreathed after carbon dioxide absorption; a reflector on the other hand specifically retains the anaesthetic during expiration and resupplies it during the next inspiration. Reflection systems can be used in conjunction with intensive care ventilators and do not need the permanent presence of trained qualified staff. Because of easy handling and better ventilatory capabilities of intensive care ventilators, reflection systems facilitate the routine use of volatile anaesthetics in intensive care units. Until now, there are three reflection systems commercially available: the established AnaConDa™ (Sedana Medical, Uppsala, Sweden), the new smaller AnaConDa-S™, and the Mirus™ (Pall Medical, Dreieich, Germany). The AnaConDa consists only of a reflector which is connected to a syringe pump for infusion of liquid sevoflurane or isoflurane. The Mirus represents a technical advancement; its control unit includes a gas and ventilation monitor as well as a gas dispensing unit. The functionality, specific features, advantages and disadvantages of both systems are discussed in the text.

Pressure-flow characteristics of breathing systems and their components for pediatric and adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Breathing circuits connect the ventilator to the patients' respiratory system. Breathing tubes, connectors, and sensors contribute to artificial airway resistance to a varying extent. We hypothesized that the flow-dependent resistance is higher in pediatric breathing systems and their components compared to respective types for adults. AIMS: We aimed to characterize the resistance of representative breathing systems and their components used in pediatric patients (including devices for adults) by their nonlinear pressure-flow relationship. METHODS: We used a physical model to measure the flow-dependent pressure gradient (∆P) across breathing tubes, breathing tube extensions, 90°- and Y-connectors, flow- and carbon dioxide sensors, water traps and reusable, disposable and coaxial breathing systems for pediatric and for adult patients. ∆P was analyzed for usual flow ranges and statistically compared at a representative flow rate of 300 mL∙s-1 (∆P300 ). RESULTS: ∆P across pediatric devices always exceeded ∆P across the corresponding devices for adult patients (all P < .001 [no 95% CI includes 0]). ∆P300 across breathing system components for adults was always below 0.2 cmH2 O but reached up to 4.6 cmH2 O in a flow sensor for pediatric patients. ∆P300 was considerably higher across the reusable compared to the disposable pediatric breathing systems (1.9 vs 0.3 cmH2 O, P < .001, [95% CI -1.59 to -1.56]). CONCLUSION: The resistances of pediatric breathing systems and their components result in pressure gradients exceeding those for adults several fold. Considering the resistance of individual components is crucial for composing a breathing system matching the patient's needs. Compensation of the additional resistance should be considered if a large composed resistance is unavoidable.

High volatile anaesthetic conservation with a digital in-line vaporizer and a reflector.

BACKGROUND: A volatile anaesthetic (VA) reflector can reduce VA consumption (VAC) at the cost of fine control of its delivery and CO2 accumulation. A digital in-line vaporizer and a second CO2 absorber circumvent both of these limitations. We hypothesized that the combination of a VA reflector with an in-line vaporizer would yield substantial VA conservation, independent of fresh gas flow (FGF) in a circle circuit, and provide fine control of inspired VA concentrations. METHOD: Prospective observational study on six Yorkshire pigs. A secondary anaesthetic circuit consisting of a Y-piece with 2 one-way valves, an in-line vaporizer and a CO2 absorber in the inspiratory limb was connected to the patient's side of the VA reflector. The other side was connected to the Y-piece of a circle anaesthetic circuit. In six pigs, an inspired concentration of sevoflurane of 2.5% was maintained by the in-line vaporizer. We measured VAC at FGF of 1, 4 and 10 l/min. RESULTS: With the secondary circuit, VAC was 55% less than with the circle system alone at FGF 1 l/min, and independent of FGF over the range of 1-10 l/min. Insertion of a CO2 absorber in the secondary circuit reduced Pet CO2 by 1.3-2.0 kpa (10-15 mmHg). CONCLUSION: A secondary circuit with reflector and in-line vaporizer provides highly efficient anaesthetic delivery, independent of FGF. A second CO2 absorber was necessary to scavenge the CO2 reflected by the anaesthetic reflector. This secondary circuit may turn any open circuit ventilator into an anaesthetic delivery unit.

Do heat and moisture exchangers in the anaesthesia breathing circuit preserve body temperature in dogs undergoing anaesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the use of a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) preserves body temperature in dogs weighing <10 kg anaesthetised for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, clinical trial. ANIMALS: Thirty-one client-owned dogs. METHODS: Dogs were assigned randomly to a treatment group [HME (n = 16) or no HME (n = 15)]. Dogs were pseudorandomised according to the premedication they were administered, either dexmedetomidine or no dexmedetomidine. Induction agents were not standardised. General anaesthesia was maintained with isoflurane vaporised in 100% oxygen delivered using a T-piece and a fresh gas flow of 600 mL kg-1 minute-1. Rectal temperature was measured before premedication (T1), after induction (T2), before moving to the MRI unit (T3) and at the end of the MRI scan (T4). Ambient temperatures were measured in the induction room, outside and inside the MRI unit. Data were analysed using a general linear model with T4 as the outcome variable. Linear correlations were performed between T1, T2, T3 and T4, and variables that predicted T4 were investigated. RESULTS: Sex, age and body mass were not significantly different between groups. There were no significant differences in rectal temperature between groups at any time point (group with HME at the end of MRI = 36.3 ± 1.1 °C; group with no HME at the end of MRI = 36.2 ± 1.4 °C) but at the end of the MRI, dogs administered dexmedetomidine (36.6 ± 0.7 °C) had a higher rectal temperature compared with dogs not administered dexmedetomidine (35.9 ± 1.6 °C) for premedication. Rectal temperature varied directly with ambient temperature in MRI scanning room and inversely with anaesthetic duration. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Using an HME did not alter body temperature in dogs weighing <10 kg undergoing an MRI, but including dexmedetomidine in the premedication regimen seemed to preserve the body temperature during anaesthesia.

Effects of different fresh gas flows with or without a heat and moisture exchanger on inhaled gas humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The minimum inhaled gas absolute humidity level is 20 mgH2O l for short-duration use in general anaesthesia and 30 mgH2O l for long-duration use in intensive care to avoid respiratory tract dehydration. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to compare the effects of different fresh gas flows (FGFs) through a circle rebreathing system with or without a heat and moisture exchanger (HME) on inhaled gas absolute humidity in adults undergoing general anaesthesia. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. We defined FGF (l min) as minimal (0.25 to 0.5), low (0.6 to 1.0) or high (≥2). We extracted the inhaled gas absolute humidity data at 60 and 120 min after connection of the patient to the breathing circuit. The effect size is expressed as the mean differences and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO, LILACS and CENTRAL until January 2017. RESULTS: We included 10 studies. The inhaled gas absolute humidity was higher with minimal flow compared with low flow at 120 min [mean differences 2.51 (95%CI: 0.32 to 4.70); P = 0.02] but not at 60 min [mean differences 2.95 (95%CI: -0.95 to 6.84); P = 0.14], and higher with low flow compared with high flow at 120 min [mean differences 7.19 (95%CI: 4.53 to 9.86); P < 0.001]. An inhaled gas absolute humidity minimum of 20 mgH2O l was attained with minimal flow at all times but not with low or high flows. An HME increased the inhaled gas absolute humidity: with minimal flow at 120 min [mean differences 8.49 (95%CI: 1.15 to 15.84); P = 0.02]; with low flow at 60 min [mean differences 9.87 (95%CI: 3.18 to 16.57); P = 0.04] and 120 min [mean differences 7.19 (95%CI: 3.29 to 11.10); P = 0.003]; and with high flow of 2 l min at 60 min [mean differences 6.46 (95%CI: 4.05 to 8.86); P < 0.001] and of 3 l min at 120 min [mean differences 12.18 (95%CI: 6.89 to 17.47); P < 0.001]. The inhaled gas absolute humidity data attained or were near 30 mgH2O l when an HME was used at all FGFs and times. CONCLUSION: All intubated patients should receive a HME with low or high flows. With minimal flow, a HME adds cost and is not needed to achieve an appropriate inhaled gas absolute humidity.

Increased Resistance to Flow and Ventilator Failure Secondary to Faulty CO2 Absorbent Insert Not Detected During Automated Anesthesia Machine Check: A Case Report.

Most modern anesthesia workstations provide automated checkout, which indicates the readiness of the anesthesia machine. In this case report, an anesthesia machine passed the automated machine checkout. Minutes after the induction of general anesthesia, we observed a mismatch between the selected and delivered tidal volumes in the volume auto flow mode with increased inspiratory resistance during manual ventilation. Endotracheal tube kinking, circuit obstruction, leaks, and patient-related factors were ruled out. Further investigation revealed a broken internal insert within the CO2 absorbent canister that allowed absorbent granules to cause a partial obstruction to inspiratory and expiratory flow triggering contradictory alarms. We concluded that even when the automated machine checkout indicates machine readiness, unforeseen equipment failure due to unexpected events can occur and require providers to remain vigilant.

A novel system for automated propofol sedation: hybrid sedation system (HSS).

Closed-loop systems for propofol have been demonstrated to be safe and reliable for general anesthesia. However, no study has been conducted using a closed-loop system specifically designed for sedation in patients under spinal anesthesia. We developed an automatic anesthesia sedation system that allows for closed-loop delivery of propofol for sedation integrating a decision support system, called the hybrid sedation system (HSS). The objective of this study is to compare this system with standard practice. One hundred fifty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two groups: HSS-Group (N = 75), in which propofol was administered using a closed-loop system; Control Group (N = 75), in which propofol was delivered manually. The clinical performance of the propofol sedation control is defined as efficacy to maintain bispectral index (BIS) near 65. The clinical control was called 'Excellent', 'Good', 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' with BIS values within 10 %, from 11 to 20 %, 21 to 30 %, or greater than 30 % of the BIS target of 65, respectively. The controller performance was evaluated using Varvel's parameters. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation, groups were compared using t test or Chi square test, P < 0.05. Clinical performance of sedation showed 'Excellent' control in the HSS-group for a significantly longer period of time (49 vs. 26 % in the control group, P < 0.0001). 'Poor' and 'Inadequate' sedation was significantly shorter in the HSS Group compared to the Control Group (11 and 10 % vs. 20 and 18 %, respectively, P < 0.0001). The novel, closed-loop system for propofol sedation showed better maintenance of the target BIS value compared to manual administration.

FLOW-i ventilator performance in the presence of a circle system leak.

Recently, the FLOW-i anaesthesia ventilator was developed based on the SERVO-i intensive care ventilator. The aim of this study was to test the FLOW-i's tidal volume delivery in the presence of a leak in the breathing circuit. We ventilated a test lung model in volume-, pressure-, and pressure-regulated volume-controlled modes (VC, PC, and PRVC, respectively) with a FLOW-i. First, the circuit remained airtight and the ventilator was tested with fresh gas flows of 6, 1, and 0.3 L/min in VC, PC, and PRVC modes and facing 4 combinations of different resistive and elastic loads. Second, a fixed leak in the breathing circuit was introduced and the measurements repeated. In the airtight system, FLOW-i maintained tidal volume (VT) and circuit pressure at approximately the set values, independently of respiratory mode, load, or fresh gas flow. In the leaking circuit, set VT = 500 mL, FLOW-i delivered higher VTs in PC (about 460 mL) than in VC and PRVC, where VTs were substantially less than 500 mL. Interestingly, VT did not differ appreciably from 6 to 0.3 L/min of fresh air flow among the 3 ventilatory modes. In the absence of leakage, peak inspiratory pressures were similar, while they were 35-45 % smaller in PRVC and VC than in PC mode in the presence of leaks. In conclusion, FLOW-i maintained VT (down to fresh gas flows of 0.3 L/min) to 90 % of its preset value in PC mode, which was 4-5 times greater than in VC or PRVC modes.

Potential rapid solutions to maintain ventilation in the event of anaesthesia machine failure with no access to the patient's airway.

Anaesthesia machine failure requires rapid solutions to maintain ventilation and anaesthesia. During procedures with poor access to the patient's airway, it may not be possible to use a self-inflating mechanical ventilation device (SIMVD) for emergency ventilation, and alternative solutions are needed. We evaluated five methods for rescue ventilation using a patient simulator. In Method 1, we used the inspiratory and expiratory tubes and the alternative common gas outlet (ACGO) on the anaesthesia machine to produce a Mapleson E system. In Method 2, we used the tubes, ACGO and an open-ended reservoir bag to produce a Mapleson F system, controlling the bag to achieve ventilation. In Method 3, we attached a SIMVD to the inspiratory tube, and controlled occlusion of the expiratory tube. In Method 4, we used the tubes and ACGO in a Mapleson F configuration, replacing the open-ended bag with a SIMVD to facilitate manual ventilation. In Method 5, we attached a SIMVD to the expiratory tube and left the inspiratory tube attached to its mounting. We were able to achieve ventilation, maintain inhalational anaesthesia, and prevent expired gas rebreathing in Methods 1 and 2. In Method 3 ventilation was achieved with minimal rebreathing of expiratory gas, but with no inhalational agent. Methods 4 and 5 led to rebreathing. Our findings indicate that Methods 1 or 2 are the preferred rapid solutions to maintain ventilation and inhalational anaesthesia in the event of anaesthesia machine failure where there is poor airway access.