ABSTRACT
Biocompatible and luminescent nanostructures synthesized by capping gold-carbon nanoparticles (HOOC-4-C6H4-AuNPs) with amino acids tyrosine, tryptophan, and cysteine were used for the quantitative estimation of ranitidine (RNH), a peptic ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux drug. We applied a fluorescence quenching mechanism to investigate the viability of the energy transfer based on gold-carbon nanosensors. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) calculations showed a donor-acceptor distance of 1.69 nm (Tyr@AuNPs), 2.27 nm (Trp@AuNPs), and 2.32 nm (Cys@AuNPs). The constant time-resolved fluorescence lifetime measurements supported the static quenching nature. This method was successfully utilized in the detection and quantification of RNH, with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.174, 0.56, and 0.332 µM for Tyr@AuNP, Trp@AuNP, and Cys@AuNP bioconjugates, respectively. This approach was also successful in the quantification of RNH in spiked serum samples.
Subject(s)
Amino Acids/chemistry , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Fluorescent Dyes/chemistry , Gold/chemistry , Nanoparticles/chemistry , Ranitidine/blood , Carbon/chemistry , Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer/methods , Humans , Limit of DetectionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The pharmacokinetics of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may be affected by food intake. We aimed to evaluate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole, rabeprazole, and pantoprazole. SETTING: The study population comprised 186 healthy volunteers participating in 6 bioequivalence clinical trials. METHOD: Subjects were evaluated to determine the effect of a high-fat breakfast on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (n = 36), rabeprazole (n = 69), and pantoprazole (n = 81). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Drug plasma concentrations were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. RESULTS: Food affected the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole (increased Tmax and decreased AUC and Cmax), pantoprazole (increased Tmax and decreased AUC), and rabeprazole (increased Tmax, Cmax and half-life). Food increased variability in Tmax for all 3 drugs, delaying absorption around 3 to 4 h and until 20 h in some subjects. CONCLUSION: As food delays the absorption of PPIs and increases their variability, it would be better to administer these drugs under fasting conditions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database: EudraCT : 2004-003863-59 (registration date 05/MAR/2004), EudraCT 2006-001162-17 (registration date 17-MAR-2006), EudraCT: 2007-002489-37 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2007-002490-31 (registration date 12-JUN-2007), EudraCT: 2010-024029-19 (registration date 23-NOV-2010).
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Dietary Fats/administration & dosage , Food-Drug Interactions , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Pantoprazole/pharmacokinetics , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Rabeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Fasting/metabolism , Female , Genotype , Humans , Male , Omeprazole/blood , Pantoprazole/blood , Proton Pump Inhibitors/blood , Rabeprazole/blood , Young AdultABSTRACT
The efficacy and safety of zinc acetate hydrate (ZAH) for zinc supplementation in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) remains unknown. In this prospective, single-center, open-label, parallel-group trial for MHD patients with serum zinc level <70 µg/dL, we compared ZAH (zinc; 50 mg/day) and polaprezinc (PPZ; zinc; 34 mg/day) beyond 6-month administration in a 1:1 randomization manner. The ZAH and PPZ groups had 44 and 47 patients, respectively. At 3 months, the change rate of serum zinc levels in the ZAH group was significantly higher than that in the PPZ group. Three months after the study, serum copper levels significantly decreased in the ZAH group, but not in the PPZ group. No significant differences were noted in anemia management in either group. ZAH was superior to PPZ in increasing serum zinc levels. Clinicians should note the stronger decline in serum copper levels when using ZAH for MHD patients.
Subject(s)
Carnosine/analogs & derivatives , Malnutrition/drug therapy , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Renal Dialysis/methods , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Zinc Acetate/therapeutic use , Zinc/deficiency , Aged , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Carnosine/blood , Carnosine/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Male , Malnutrition/blood , Malnutrition/complications , Middle Aged , Organometallic Compounds/blood , Prospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/blood , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Treatment Outcome , Zinc/blood , Zinc Acetate/blood , Zinc Compounds/blood , Zinc Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
This study was designed to evaluate a comparative single dose (40mg) pharmacokinetics (PK) of Omeprazole (OMP) and its two metabolites, 5-hydroxy Omeprazole (5-OH-OMP) and Omeprazole sulphone (OMP-S) in poor (PM) and extensive (EM) metabolizer Pakistani healthy adult volunteers. The frequency of CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 varies widely in different populations. The present study was conducted to evaluate the PK of OMP and its two metabolites in Pakistani population and to review different studies conducted after administration of single dose of OMP. Twenty two subjects were enrolled in this study and divided into two groups. The CYP2C19 phenotyping was evaluated by the metabolic ratio of OMP to 5-OH-OMP. It was a single dose, open label study and the blood samples from subjects were collected at different time intervals until 24 hours. The PK parameters were calculated using the PK-summit software. The metabolic ratio of area under the plasma concentration-time curve AUCOMP/5-OH-OMP was 1.86 ± 0.572 and13.84 ± 2.504 for EM and PM, respectively; maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of OMP was increased by two folds for PM while the AUC∞ was increased by 3 folds; the Cmax and AUC∞ of 5-OH-OMP decreased for PM by 2 folds while there was 3 fold increase observed in the Cmax and AUC∞ of OMP-S. The PK of OMP and its metabolites in different populations were also discussed, and issues regarding CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 genotyping were also extensively reviewed. In EM of CYP2C19 the concentration of 5-OH-OMP is higher while that of OMP-S is lower. This study as well as reported studies reveals that in PM of CYP2C19 more drugs are available for CYP3A4 to be metabolized. A correlation between CYP2C19 EM and PM activity with CYP3A4 needs to be established.
Subject(s)
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/metabolism , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/metabolism , Omeprazole/analogs & derivatives , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/blood , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Area Under Curve , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP3A/genetics , Genotype , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Omeprazole/blood , Omeprazole/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Limited sampling strategy (LSS) is a validated method to estimate pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from a reduced number of samples. Omeprazole is used to phenotype in vivo cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 activity. This study examined an LSS using 2 estimation methods to determine apparent oral clearance (CL/F) and thus CYP2C19 activity. METHODS: Data from 7 previously published studies included healthy subjects receiving a single, oral dose of omeprazole with intensive PK sampling. CL/F was estimated using noncompartmental analysis (NCA) and population PK modeling. LSS was simulated by selecting the 1, 2, 4, and/or 6-hour postdose time points. Linear regression was performed to assess whether CL/F estimated from limited sampling could accurately predict CL/F from the full PK profile. RESULTS: Median CL/F was 23.7 L/h by NCA and 19.3 L/h by population PK modeling. In comparing the LSS NCA estimated versus observed CL/F, all evaluated linear regression models had unacceptable coefficients of determination (r, range: 0.14-0.81). With the population PK approach, 737 plasma concentrations (n = 71) and CYP2C19 genotype data were described with a 1-compartment structural model with mixed zero and first-order absorption and lag time. In comparing the population PK LSS estimated versus observed CL/F, all evaluated linear regression models had unacceptable r (range: 0.02-0.74). Post hoc comparison of CYP2C19 poor metabolizers versus CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers resulted in significantly lower CL/F in poor metabolizers versus extensive metabolizers. CONCLUSIONS: Omeprazole LSS performed poorly in estimating CL/F using 2 separate estimation approaches and does not seem to be a suitable method for determining CYP2C19 activity.
Subject(s)
Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/metabolism , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Sample Size , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Computer Simulation , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Genotype , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Models, Biological , Omeprazole/bloodABSTRACT
The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of proton pump inhibitors differ among cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes. Therefore, we developed azeloprazole sodium (Z-215), a novel proton pump inhibitor, whose metabolism is not affected by CYP2C19 activity in vitro. However, the PK and PD of azeloprazole sodium have not been evaluated in Japanese subjects. We conducted an open-label, crossover study in healthy Japanese male volunteers to evaluate the plasma concentration and intragastric pH with respect to CYP2C19 genotype after repeated administration of 10, 20, and 40 mg azeloprazole sodium and 10 and 20 mg rabeprazole sodium (rabeprazole). The plasma concentration profile of azeloprazole sodium was similar among genotypes, whereas that of rabeprazole differed. The 24-hour intragastric pH ≥ 4 holding time ratio (pH ≥ 4 HTR) of azeloprazole sodium was similar among genotypes. The pH ≥ 4 HTR was 52.5%-60.3%, 55.1%-65.8%, and 69.4%-77.1% after administration of 10, 20, and 40 mg azeloprazole sodium, respectively, and 59.2%-72.3% and 64.4%-91.2% after administration of 10 and 20 mg rabeprazole, respectively, on the fifth day of dosing. The maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC), and pH ≥ 4 HTR of azeloprazole sodium were proportional to dose. The Cmax , AUC, and pH ≥ 4 HTR on day 5 were slightly higher following administration of 20 mg azeloprazole sodium before comparison with after a meal. No serious adverse events were observed. These results suggest that azeloprazole sodium is useful for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease in all CYP2C19 genotypes.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Benzimidazoles/pharmacology , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacology , Sulfoxides/pharmacology , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Area Under Curve , Asian People/genetics , Benzimidazoles/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Gastric Acidity Determination , Gastric Juice/chemistry , Genotype , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Proton Pump Inhibitors/blood , Sulfoxides/blood , Young AdultABSTRACT
Momelotinib is a potent and selective small-molecule inhibitor of JAK1/2 that is under investigation for the treatment of myeloproliferative neoplasms. In a phase 1/2 study in myelofibrosis patients, once-daily dosing of a 300-mg momelotinib capsule was selected for further development based on a favorable benefit:risk profile. A tablet formulation was recently developed for further clinical evaluation. In this study, the relative bioavailability of the tablet formulation versus the initial capsule formulation and the effect of food and omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of a single-dose momelotinib tablet were evaluated in healthy subjects. The momelotinib tablet, 200 mg, provided plasma exposure equivalent to the 300-mg capsule. Plasma exposure of momelotinib increased less than dose-proportionally from 100 to 800 mg. Food intake modestly increased Cmax (38% and 28% increase for low- and high-fat meals, respectively) and AUCinf (16% and 28% increase for low- and high-fat meals, respectively) for the momelotinib tablet. Omeprazole reduced the exposure of the momelotinib tablet by 36% for Cmax and 33% for AUCinf . Neither the food effect nor the omeprazole effect on momelotinib exposure was considered clinically meaningful because of the safety and efficacy profile of momelotinib.
Subject(s)
Benzamides/blood , Drug Interactions/physiology , Food-Drug Interactions/physiology , Omeprazole/blood , Pyrimidines/blood , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Benzamides/pharmacology , Biological Availability , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Compounding , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/blood , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Pyrimidines/pharmacology , Tablets , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Esomeprazole is an S-enantiomer of omeprazole that has favorable pharmacokinetics and efficacious acid suppressant properties in humans. However, the pharmacokinetics and effects on intragastric pH of esomeprazole in dogs have not been reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pharmacokinetics of esomeprazole administered via various routes (PK study) and to investigate the effect of esomeprazole on intragastric pH with a Bravo pH monitoring system (PD study). ANIMALS: Seven adult male Beagle dogs and 5 adult male Beagle dogs were used for PK and PD study, respectively. METHODS: Both studies used an open, randomized, and crossover design. In the PK study, 7 dogs received intravenous (IV), subcutaneous (SC), and oral doses (PO) of esomeprazole (1 mg/kg). Each treatment period was separated by a washout period of at least 10 days. Esomeprazole plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC/MS/MS. In the efficacy study, intragastric pH was recorded without medication (baseline pH) and following IV, SC, and PO esomeprazole dosing regimens (1 mg/kg) in 5 dogs. RESULTS: The bioavailability of esomeprazole administered as PO enteric-coated granules and as SC injections was 71.4 and 106%, respectively. The half-life was approximately 1 hour. Mean ± SD percent time intragastric pH was ≥3 and ≥4 was 58.9 ± 21.1% and 40.9 ± 17.3% for IV group, 75.8 ± 16.4% and 62.7 ± 17.7% for SC group, 88.2 ± 8.9% and 82.5 ± 7.7% for PO group, and 12.5 ± 3.6% and 3.7 ± 1.8% for baseline. The mean percent time with intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 was significantly increased regardless of the dosing route (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The PK parameters for PO and SC esomeprazole administration were favorable, and esomeprazole significantly increased intragastric pH after IV, PO, and SC administration. IV and SC administration of esomeprazole might be useful when PO administration is not possible. No significant adverse effects were observed.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Esomeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Esomeprazole/administration & dosage , Esomeprazole/blood , Esomeprazole/pharmacology , Esophagus/drug effects , Female , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration/drug effects , Injections, Intravenous/veterinary , Injections, Subcutaneous/veterinary , Male , Reference ValuesABSTRACT
In this study, the population pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis of rebamipide (Reba) in healthy male Korean subjects was analyzed using the nonlinear mixed effects modeling method. The possible effects of physiological covariates and the multidrug resistance (MDR1) gene 3435C>T polymorphism on PK parameters were also investigated. Data were collected from a bioequivalence study, in which 26 subjects who participated in the study were administered a single oral dose of 100 mg Reba; only data from the reference formulation were used. Reba showed a relatively large inter-individual variability (from 2.6- to 3.3-fold) in the PK parameters with double peaks or the concentration plateau after the peak concentration in its serum concentration-time profiles. The population PKs of Reba was best described by a one-compartment model with three fraction absorption processes followed a single Weibull-type function and two first-order kinetics, and lag times. The study suggests that the efflux transporter MDR1 3435C>T allele affects the substantial inter-individual variability in the absorption of Reba according to genetic polymorphism. A significant difference was found in the absorption rate ka 1 among the MDR1 3435C>T genotype groups (P < 0.05) (CT group, 79.8% increase; and TT group, 115% increase). The use of combined MDR1 3435C>T and body mass index as covariates for ka 1 exerted a more significant effect (P < 0.05). In addition, body surface area significantly affected the apparent total clearance (P < 0.05).
Subject(s)
ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1/genetics , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Gastrointestinal Absorption/physiology , Quinolones/administration & dosage , Quinolones/pharmacokinetics , ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B , Administration, Oral , Adult , Alanine/administration & dosage , Alanine/blood , Alanine/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Cross-Over Studies , Gastrointestinal Absorption/drug effects , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Male , Quinolones/blood , Republic of Korea/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
A fully automated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was developed for the determination of omeprazole in human plasma. Utilization of 96-well plates and robotic liquid handling workstations, rendered the whole procedure very fast, compared to the manual respective procedure of Liquid-Liquid Extraction (LLE). Sample analysis was performed by reversed phase LC-MS/MS, with positive electrospray ionization, using multiple reaction monitoring (MRM). The method required low plasma volumes and analysis of samples was completed in short run times. It was fully validated and applied to a pharmacokinetic study after per os administration of 20mg tablet formulations of omeprazole. The obtained concentrations were used for the calculation of the basic omeprazole pharmacokinetic parameters. Some variations observed in pharmacokinetic parameters among subjects were attributed to differences of CYP2C19 genotype. Therefore, a novel molecular method was developed in which DNA analysis was conducted by using Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction (Real Time-PCR). As source of biological material, Dried Blood Spots (DBS) were utilized, offering an alternative and advantageous strategy for such kind of studies.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Omeprazole/blood , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid/methods , Genotype , Humans , Liquid-Liquid Extraction/methods , Polymorphism, Genetic , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Tandem Mass Spectrometry/methodsABSTRACT
This study aimed to investigate the effect of diet and dose on the pharmacokinetics of omeprazole in the horse. Six horses received two doses (1 and 4 mg/kg) of omeprazole orally once daily for 5 days. Each dose was evaluated during feeding either a high-grain/low-fibre (HG/LF) diet or an ad libitum hay (HAY) diet in a four-way crossover design. Plasma samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis on days 1 and 5. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by ultra-high pressure liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. In horses being fed the HG/LF diet, on day 1, the area under the curve (AUC) and maximal plasma concentration (Cmax ) were higher on the 4 mg/kg dose than on the 1 mg/kg dose. The AUC was higher on day 5 compared to day 1 with the 4 mg/kg dose on the HG/LF diet. On days 1 and 5, the AUC and Cmax were higher in horses being fed the HG/LF diet and receiving the 4 mg/kg dose than in horses being fed the HAY diet and receiving the 1 mg/kg dose. These findings suggest that both dose and diet may affect pharmacokinetic variables of omeprazole in the horse.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Diet/veterinary , Horses/blood , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Area Under Curve , Cross-Over Studies , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Drug Administration Schedule , Half-Life , Horses/metabolism , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Famotidine is an acid suppressant commonly administered to dogs. Prolonged famotidine use in people results in decreased efficacy, but the effect in dogs is unknown. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: To compare the effect of repeated oral administration of famotidine or placebo on intragastric pH and serum gastrin in dogs. We hypothesized that famotidine would have a diminished effect on intragastric pH on day 13 compared to day 1. ANIMALS: Six healthy adult colony Beagles. METHODS: Randomized, 2-factor repeated-measures crossover design. All dogs received oral placebo or 1.0 mg/kg famotidine q12h for 14 consecutive days. Intragastric pH monitoring was used to continuously record intragastric pH on treatment days 1-2 and 12-13. Mean pH as well as mean percentage time (MPT) that intragastric pH was ≥3 or ≥4 were compared between and within groups by analysis of variance. Serum gastrin was measured on days 0, 3, and 12 for each treatment. RESULTS: Continued administration of famotidine resulted in a significant decrease in mean pH, MPT ≥3, and MPT ≥4 (P < .0001) on day 12 and 13. This resulted in a mean decrease in pH by 1.63 on days 12 and 13 compared to days 1 and 2. Furthermore, a mean decrease of MPT ≥3 and MPT ≥4 by 33 and 45% was observed for the same time period, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Continued administration of famotidine results in a diminished effect on intragastric pH in dogs. Caution is advised when recommending long-term, daily oral administration of famotidine to dogs.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacology , Famotidine/pharmacology , Gastrins/blood , Stomach/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Over Studies , Dogs , Drug Administration Schedule , Famotidine/administration & dosage , Famotidine/blood , Famotidine/pharmacokinetics , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , MaleABSTRACT
The use of anti-ulcer medications, such as cimetidine, ranitidine, and omeprazole, is common in performance horses. The use of these drugs is regulated in performance horses, and as such a withdrawal time is necessary prior to competition to avoid a medication violation. To the authors' knowledge, there are no reports in the literature describing repeated oral administrations of these drugs in the horse to determine a regulatory threshold and related withdrawal time recommendations. Therefore, the objective of the current study was to describe the disposition and elimination pharmacokinetics of these anti-ulcer medications following oral administration to provide data upon which appropriate regulatory recommendations can be established. Nine exercised Thoroughbred horses were administered 20 mg/kg BID of cimetidine or 8 mg/kg BID of ranitidine, both for seven doses or 2.28 g of omeprazole SID for four doses. Blood samples were collected, serum drug concentrations were determined, and elimination pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated. The serum elimination half-life was 7.05 ± 1.02, 7.43 ± 0.851 and 3.94 ± 1.04 h for cimetidine, ranitidine, and omeprazole, respectively. Serum cimetidine and ranitidine concentrations were above the LOQ and omeprazole and omeprazole sulfide below the LOQ in all horses studied upon termination of sample collection.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cimetidine/pharmacokinetics , Horses/metabolism , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Ranitidine/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Cimetidine/administration & dosage , Cimetidine/blood , Drug Administration Schedule/veterinary , Female , Half-Life , Male , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/blood , Physical Conditioning, Animal , Ranitidine/administration & dosage , Ranitidine/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of gestational age on pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in newborns with gastroesophageal reflux. METHODS: A prospective, descriptive and pharmacokinetic study was carried out in 30 pre-term and 20 full-term babies. 3 mg/kg of ranitidine was administered intravenously to all the babies and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 h following the administration, samples of blood were drawn to assess ranitidine levels using high performance liquid chromatographic technique. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine had a bi-exponential behavior with a half-life elimination of (t1/2el) 2.79 h, area under curve (AUC) of 1688 ng/mL, volume of distribution (Vd) of 1.44 L/kg, and clearance (Cl) of 5.9 L/kg/h. The median plasmatic concentration in pre-terms was 1113 ng/mL and 280 ng/mL in full-terms. Vd, t1/2 and Cl presented high values in preterm although the correlation of Cl with glomerular filtration in term newborns was better. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma levels of ranitidine depend on the gestational age of the newborns. However, the possible relationship between after-birth age and pharmacokinetics of the neonates as their internal organs get matured without minding their gestational background.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Gastroesophageal Reflux/drug therapy , Infant, Premature, Diseases/drug therapy , Ranitidine/pharmacokinetics , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/therapeutic use , Area Under Curve , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Female , Gastroesophageal Reflux/blood , Gestational Age , Half-Life , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Infant, Premature, Diseases/blood , Injections, Intravenous , Male , Prospective Studies , Ranitidine/blood , Ranitidine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
A simple and enantioselective method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of (R)- and (S)-lansoprazole in human plasma by chiral liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Lansoprazole enantiomers and internal standard (esomeprazole) were extracted from plasma using acetonitrile as protein precipitating agent. Baseline chiral separation was achieved within 9.0 min on a Chiralpak IC column (150 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) with the column temperature of 30°C. The mobile phase consisted of 10 mM ammonium acetate solution containing 0.05% acetic acid/acetonitrile (50:50, v/v). The mass spectrometric analysis was performed using a QTrap 5500 mass spectrometer coupled with an electrospray ionization source in positive ion mode. The multiple reactions monitoring transitions of m/z 370.1â252.1 and 346.1â198.1 were used to quantify lansoprazole enantiomers and esomeprazole, respectively. For each enantiomer, no apparent matrix effect was found, the calibration curve was linear over 5.00-3000 ng/mL, the intra- and inter-day precisions were below 10.0%, and the accuracy was -3.8 to 3.3%. Analytes were stable during the study. No chiral inversion was observed during sample storage, preparation procedure and analysis. The method was applied to the stereoselective pharmacokinetic studies in human after intravenous administration of dexlansoprazole or racemic lansoprazole.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Chromatography, Liquid/methods , Lansoprazole/blood , Mass Spectrometry/methods , Anti-Ulcer Agents/chemistry , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Lansoprazole/chemistry , Lansoprazole/pharmacokinetics , StereoisomerismABSTRACT
The objectives of this study were to investigate the impact of formulation (enteric coated and buffered) and feeding on pharmacokinetic variables associated with the oral administration of omeprazole in the horse. Six thoroughbred racehorses were studied in a crossover design. Each received 2 g of an enteric coated or buffered formulation in both the fed and fasted state. Plasma omeprazole concentrations were determined by UHPLC-MS. The effects of feeding or formulation on AUC0-inf_obs, half-life, Tmax or Cmax were not statistically significant. However, a wider-than-expected degree of variation was present and examination of the raw data suggests that an effect of feeding, wherein the bioavailability of omeprazole may be reduced in the fed animal, may be present. Further investigation in a larger population of animals to assess the factors that contribute to the wide degree of absorption observed is warranted.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Animals , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Eating/physiology , Fasting/metabolism , Female , Horses/blood , Horses/metabolism , Male , Omeprazole/administration & dosage , Omeprazole/bloodABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Polymorphism of CYP2C19 gene is one of the important factors in pharmacokinetics of CYP2C19 substrates. Omeprazole is a proton pump inhibitor which is mainly metabolized by cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19). The aim of present study was to assess omeprazole hydroxylation index as a measure of CYP2C19 activity considering new variant allele (CYP2C19*17) in Iranian population and also to see if this activity is sex dependent. METHODS: One hundred and eighty healthy unrelated Iranian individuals attended in this study. Blood samples for genotyping and phenotyping were collected 3 hours after administration of 20 mg omeprazole orally. Genotyping of 2C19 variant alleles *2, *3 and *17 was performed by using polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) and semi-nested PCR methods. Plasma concentrations of omeprazole and hydroxyomeprazole were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) technique and hydxroxylation index (HI) (omeprazole/ hydroxyomeprazole) was calculated. RESULTS: The CYP2C19*17 was the most common variant allele in the studied population (21.6%). Genotype frequencies of CYP2C19*17*17, *1*17, and *2*17 were 5.5%, 28.8% and 3.3% respectively. The lowest and the highest median omeprazole HI was observed in *17*17 and *2*2 genotypes respectively (0.36 vs. 13.09). The median HI of omeprazole in subjects homozygous for CYP2C19*1 was 2.16-fold higher than individuals homozygous for CYP2C19*17 (P < 0.001) and the median HI of CYP2C19*1*17 genotype was 1.98-fold higher than CYP2C19 *17*17 subjects (P < 0.001). However, subjects with CYP2C19*2*17 (median HI: 1.74) and CYP2C19*1*2 (median HI: 1.98) genotypes and also CYP2C19*1*17 (median HI: 0.71) and CYP2C19*1*1 (mean HI: 0.78) did not show any significantly different enzyme activity. In addition, no statistically significant difference was found between women and men in distribution of CYP2C19 genotypes. Furthermore, the hydroxylation index of Omeprazole was not different between women and men in the studied population. CONCLUSION: Our data point out the importance of CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 variant alleles in metabolism of omeprazole and therefore CYP2C19 activity. Regarding the high frequency of CYP2C19*17 in Iranian population, the importance of this new variant allele in metabolism of CYP2C19 substrates shall be considered.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19/genetics , Omeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/blood , Adult , Alleles , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Female , Genotype , Humans , Hydroxylation , Iran , Male , Middle Aged , Omeprazole/blood , Phenotype , Polymorphism, Genetic , Proton Pump Inhibitors/blood , Sex Factors , White People , Young AdultABSTRACT
Capsaicin is a well-known component of red pepper. Recent studies have shown that capsaicin could prevent gastric ulcer provoked by various NSAID-s like acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Primary objective of this human clinical phase I trial was to investigate whether two different doses of capsaicin co-administered with ASA could alter the inhibitory effect of ASA on platelet aggregation. 15 healthy male subjects were involved in the study and treated orally with 400 µg capsaicin, 800 µg capsaicin, 500 mg ASA, 400 µg capsaicin+500 mg ASA and 800 µg capsaicin+500 mg ASA. Blood was drawn before and 1, 2, 6 and 24 hours after the drug administration. After that epinephrine induced platelet aggregation was measured by optical aggregometry. Between treatments, volunteers had a 6-day wash-out period. Our results showed that capsaicin had no effect on platelet aggregation, while as expected, ASA monotherapy resulted in a significant and clinically effective platelet aggregation inhibition (p ≤ 0.001). The combined ASA-capsaicin therapies reached equivalent effectiveness in platelet aggregation inhibition as ASA monotherapy. Our investigation proved that capsaicin did not influence the inhibitory effect of ASA on platelet aggregation, thus the capsaicin-ASA treatment would combine the antiplatelet effect of ASA with the possible gastroprotection of capsaicin.
Subject(s)
Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Aspirin/administration & dosage , Capsaicin/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation/drug effects , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Aspirin/blood , Aspirin/pharmacokinetics , Capsaicin/blood , Capsaicin/pharmacokinetics , Drug Interactions , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Hungary , Male , Middle Aged , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/blood , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Platelet Function Tests , Single-Blind Method , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ilaprazole, a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) currently in clinical use, may provide improved acid suppression vs. other PPIs. AIM: To compare the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of ilaprazole and esomeprazole. METHODS: A phase 1, randomised, open-label, single-centre, 4-period crossover study was conducted in 40 healthy volunteers. Ilaprazole 10, 20 or 40 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg was administered once daily for 5 days with ≥5-day washout intervals. Pharmacokinetic blood samples and intragastric pH measurements were collected at scheduled timepoints for 24 h after dosing on Days 1 and 5. RESULTS: Esomeprazole 40 mg provided significantly better pH control during the initial hours (0-4 h) after a single dose, but ilaprazole (particularly 20 and 40 mg) provided significantly better pH control for the entire 24-h period and during evening and overnight hours after single and multiple doses. Increasing ilaprazole doses resulted in dose-proportional increases in peak plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve following single and multiple doses. Ilaprazole was safe and generally well tolerated; an unexpectedly high incidence of allergic eye and skin reactions were observed but were not specific to any dosing regimen. Plasma gastrin concentrations did not increase proportionately with increasing ilaprazole dose. CONCLUSIONS: Ilaprazole provided significantly better pH control over 24 h and during evening and overnight hours compared with esomeprazole in healthy volunteers, which may translate to greater relief of night-time heartburn in the clinical setting for patients with gastric acid-related disorders.
Subject(s)
2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/administration & dosage , Anti-Ulcer Agents/administration & dosage , Esomeprazole/administration & dosage , Proton Pump Inhibitors/administration & dosage , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/adverse effects , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/blood , 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles/pharmacokinetics , Administration, Oral , Adult , Anti-Ulcer Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Ulcer Agents/blood , Anti-Ulcer Agents/pharmacokinetics , Cross-Over Studies , Esomeprazole/adverse effects , Esomeprazole/blood , Esomeprazole/pharmacokinetics , Female , Gastrins/blood , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Middle Aged , Proton Pump Inhibitors/adverse effects , Proton Pump Inhibitors/blood , Proton Pump Inhibitors/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
Sucralfate and minocycline may be administered concurrently to dogs. The relative bioavailability of tetracyclines may be reduced if administered with sucralfate, but studies confirming these interactions in dogs are not available. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetics of oral minocycline in dogs (M), determined the effects of concurrent administration of sucralfate and minocycline (MS) on minocycline pharmacokinetics, determined the effects of delaying sucralfate administration by 2 h (MS+2) on minocycline pharmacokinetics, and established dosing recommendations based on pharmacodynamic indices. Oral minocycline (300 mg) and sucralfate suspension (1 g) were administered to five greyhounds in a randomized crossover design. Minocycline plasma concentrations were evaluated using liquid chromatography with mass spectrometry. The maximum plasma concentration (CMAX ) and area under the curve (AUC) of minocycline were 1.15 µg/mL and 8.0 h* µg/mL, respectively. The CMAX and AUC were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in the MS group (CMAX = 0.33 µg/mL, AUC 3.0 h*µg/mL) compared with M or MS+2 (CMAX = 0.97 µg/mL, AUC 10.3 h*µg/mL). Delaying sucralfate by 2 h did not decrease oral minocycline absorption, but concurrent administration significantly decreased minocycline absorption. A dose of 7.5 mg/kg p.o. q12 h achieves the pharmacodynamic index for a bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 0.25 µg/mL (AUC:MIC≥33.9).