ABSTRACT
Although bivalirudin has been recently made available for purchase in China, large-scale analyses on the safety profile of bivalirudin among Chinese patients is lacking. Thus, this study aimed to compare the safety profile of bivalirudin and heparin as anticoagulants in Chinese ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A total of 1063 STEMI patients undergoing PCI and receiving bivalirudin (n=424, bivalirudin group) or heparin (n=639, heparin group) as anticoagulants were retrospectively enrolled. The net adverse clinical events (NACEs) within 30 days after PCI were recorded, including major adverse cardiac and cerebral events (MACCEs) and bleeding events (bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) grades 2-5 (BARC 2-5)). The incidences of NACEs (10.1 vs 15.6%) (P=0.010), BARC 2-5 bleeding events (5.2 vs 10.3%) (P=0.003), and BARC grades 3-5 (BARC 3-5) bleeding events (2.1 vs 5.5%) (P=0.007) were lower in the bivalirudin group compared to the heparin group, whereas general MACCEs incidence (8.9 vs 6.4%) (P=0.131) and each category of MACCEs (all P>0.05) did not differ between two groups. Furthermore, the multivariate logistic analyses showed that bivalirudin (vs heparin) was independently correlated with lower risk of NACEs (OR=0.508, P=0.002), BARC 2-5 bleeding events (OR=0.403, P=0.001), and BARC 3-5 bleeding events (OR=0.452, P=0.042); other independent risk factors for NACEs, MACCEs, or BARC bleeding events included history of diabetes mellitus, emergency operation, multiple lesional vessels, stent length >33.0 mm, and higher CRUSADE score (all P<0.05). Thus, bivalirudin presented a better safety profile than heparin among Chinese STEMI patients undergoing PCI.
Subject(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction , Humans , Heparin/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Antithrombins/adverse effects , ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction/surgery , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/adverse effects , East Asian People , Treatment Outcome , Hirudins/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is a life-sustaining therapy for severe respiratory failure. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuits require systemic anticoagulation that creates a delicate balance between circuit-related thrombosis and bleeding-related complications. Although unfractionated heparin is most widely used anticoagulant, alternative agents such as bivalirudin have been used. We sought to compare extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombosis and bleeding-related outcomes in respiratory failure patients receiving either unfractionated heparin or bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Single-center, cardiothoracic ICU. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients requiring venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation who were maintained on anticoagulation between 2013 and 2020. INTERNVENTIONS: IV bivalirudin or IV unfractionated heparin. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Primary outcomes were the presence of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in-circuit-related thrombotic complications and volume of blood products administered during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation duration. One hundred sixty-two patients receiving unfractionated heparin were compared with 133 patients receiving bivalirudin for anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. In patients receiving bivalirudin, there was an overall decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit thrombotic complications (p < 0.005) and a significant increase in time to circuit thrombosis (p = 0.007). Multivariable Cox regression found that heparin was associated with a significant increase in risk of clots (Exp[B] = 2.31, p = 0.001). Patients who received bivalirudin received significantly less volume of packed RBCs, fresh frozen plasma, and platelet transfusion (p < 0.001 for each). There was a significant decrease in the number major bleeding events in patients receiving bivalirudin, 40.7% versus 11.7%, p < 0.001. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving bivalirudin for systemic anticoagulation on venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experienced a decrease in the number of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation circuit-related thrombotic events as well as a significant decrease in volume of blood products administered.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Heparin/therapeutic use , Peptide Fragments/therapeutic use , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Adult , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Erythrocyte Transfusion , Female , Heparin/adverse effects , Hirudins/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Plasma , Platelet Transfusion , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Thrombosis/etiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The term Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) refers to a group of drugs that inhibit factor Xa or thrombin. Even though their use for treating different thrombotic or prothrombotic conditions is increasing recently, there is no compelling evidence indicating that those medications are safe in all antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) patients. METHODOLOGY: To address this issue, specialists from the Antiphospholipid Syndrome Committee of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology performed a comprehensive review of the literature regarding DOACs use in APS to answer the three following questions: (1) potential mechanisms of action of these drugs that could be relevant to APS pathogenesis, (2) DOACs interference on lupus anticoagulant testing, and (3) the efficacy of DOACs in APS. POSITION STATEMENT: After critically reviewing the relevant evidence, the authors formulated 8 Position Statements about DOACs use in APS. CONCLUSION: DOACs should not be routinely used in APS patients, especially in those with a high-risk profile (triple positivity to aPL, arterial thrombosis, and recurrent thrombotic events). In addition, DOACs interferes with LA testing, leading to false-positive results in patients investigating APS.
Subject(s)
Advisory Committees , Antiphospholipid Syndrome/drug therapy , Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Consensus , Administration, Oral , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antithrombins/pharmacology , Brazil , Contraindications, Drug , Drug Interactions , Drug Substitution , Humans , Lupus Coagulation Inhibitor/analysis , Observational Studies as Topic , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/therapy , Administration, Oral , Antidotes/therapeutic use , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Humans , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran and the direct factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban have at least comparable efficacy as vitamin K antagonists along with a better safety profile, reflected by a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Specific reversal agents have been developed in recent years. Namely, idarucizumab, a specific antidote for dabigatran, is currently approved in most countries. Andexanet, which reverses factor Xa inhibitors, has been recently approved by the FDA, and ciraparantag, a universal antidote targeted to reverse all DOACs, is still under investigation. In this review we provide an update on the pharmacology of DOACs, the risk of hemorrhagic complications associated with their use, the measurement of their anticoagulant effect and the reversal strategies in case of DOAC-associated bleeding.
Subject(s)
Humans , Blood Coagulation Factors/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/therapy , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/adverse effects , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Risk Factors , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Antidotes/therapeutic useSubject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Factor Xa Inhibitors/adverse effects , Factor Xa/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/drug therapy , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridones/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Administration, Oral , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Blood Loss, Surgical/prevention & control , Cerebral Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Cerebral Hemorrhage/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Dabigatran/antagonists & inhibitors , Dabigatran/immunology , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Drug Approval , Emergencies , Factor Xa/pharmacology , Factor Xa Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Humans , Pyrazoles/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/antagonists & inhibitors , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacology , Rivaroxaban/antagonists & inhibitors , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Thiazoles/antagonists & inhibitors , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , United States , United States Food and Drug AdministrationABSTRACT
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke. AF-related strokes cause greater disability and mortality than those in patients without AF, and are associated with a significant clinical and economic burden in Mexico. Antithrombotic therapy reduces stroke risk in patients with AF and is recommended for all patients except those classified as having a low stroke risk. However, its use is suboptimal all around the world; one study showed that only 4 % of Mexican patients with AF who presented with ischemic stroke were in the therapeutic range for anticoagulation. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin or acenocoumarin have long been the only oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in AF. Although effective, VKAs have disadvantages, including the need for regular coagulation monitoring and dose adjustment. Interactions with numerous common medications and foods contribute to the risk of serious bleeding and thrombotic events in VKA-treated patients. Thus novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), more properly called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), such as dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban (not available in Mexico), have been developed. These offer the convenience of fixed-dose treatment without the need for monitoring, and have few drug or food interactions. Pivotal phase III trials have demonstrated that these agents are at least as effective as warfarin in preventing stroke and are associated with a reduced risk of intracranial hemorrhage. With apixaban approved in Mexico in April 2013, clinicians now have the choice of three novel DOACs as alternatives to warfarin. However, it is yet to be established which of these agents should be the first choice, and treatment decisions are likely to depend on the individual patient's characteristics.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Evidence-Based Medicine , Precision Medicine , Stroke/prevention & control , Administration, Oral , Anticoagulants/administration & dosage , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/physiopathology , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Drug Administration Schedule , Drugs, Investigational/administration & dosage , Drugs, Investigational/adverse effects , Drugs, Investigational/therapeutic use , Humans , Mexico , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Pyrazoles/administration & dosage , Pyrazoles/adverse effects , Pyrazoles/therapeutic use , Pyridines/administration & dosage , Pyridines/adverse effects , Pyridines/therapeutic use , Pyridones/administration & dosage , Pyridones/adverse effects , Pyridones/therapeutic use , Risk Factors , Rivaroxaban/administration & dosage , Rivaroxaban/adverse effects , Rivaroxaban/therapeutic use , Stroke/epidemiology , Stroke/etiology , Thiazoles/administration & dosage , Thiazoles/adverse effects , Thiazoles/therapeutic use , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Vitamin K/metabolismABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor shown to be an effective alternative to warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF). We evaluated the use of dabigatran in patients with bioprosthetic mitral and/or aortic valve replacement and AF. METHODS: We selected 34 and randomized 27 patients in a 1:1 ratio to receive dabigatran or warfarin. The primary endpoint was the presence of a new intracardiac thrombus at 90 days, by transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE). Secondary endpoints included the development of dense spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) and incidence of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), myocardium infarction, valve thrombosis and peripheral embolic events. RESULTS: The trial was terminated prematurely because of low enrollment. There were 27 patients in total: 15 patients placed in the dabigatran group and 12 in the warfarin group. After 90 days, one patient (8.3 %) in the warfarin group and none in the dabigatran group had developed a new intracardiac thrombus. In the dabigatran group, two patients (13.3 %) developed dense SEC versus one patient (8.3 %) in the warfarin group. In the warfarin group, one patient (8.3 %) presented ischemic stroke, and none did in the dabigatran group. We observed no cases of hemorrhagic stroke, valve thrombosis, embolic events or myocardial infarction in either group throughout the study. However, one patient (6.7 %) in the dabigatran group had a fully recovered transient ischemic attack and one patient in the warfarin group died of heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of dabigatran appears to be similar to warfarin in preventing the formation of intracardiac thrombus. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01868243.
Subject(s)
Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Dabigatran/therapeutic use , Heart Diseases/drug therapy , Thrombosis/drug therapy , Warfarin/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Adult , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Atrial Fibrillation/drug therapy , Bioprosthesis , Cardiac Valve Annuloplasty , Dabigatran/administration & dosage , Dabigatran/adverse effects , Female , Heart Diseases/physiopathology , Heart Diseases/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Thrombosis/physiopathology , Thrombosis/therapy , Treatment Outcome , Warfarin/administration & dosage , Warfarin/adverse effects , Young AdultABSTRACT
Women have higher bleeding complication and mortality rates after percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The contribution of female gender to bleeding and mortality is poorly understood. We evaluated the effect of gender and bleeding on outcomes of patients treated with bivalirudin during PCI by performing a patient-level pooled analysis of 3 randomized controlled trials (the Randomized Evaluation in PCI Linking Angiomax to Reduced Clinical Events, Acute Catheterization and Urgent Intervention Triage strategY, and Harmonizing Outcomes with Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) comparing bivalirudin versus heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) treatment in patients undergoing PCI. Of 14,784 patients, 7,413 patients received bivalirudin (1,870 women) and 7,371 patients received heparin + GPI (1,910 women). Women had significantly higher 30-day non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related major bleeding rates (7.6% vs 3.8%, p <0.0001). After multivariate adjustment, female gender increased the hazard of major bleeding by 80% (hazard ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.52 to 2.11, p <0.001). Furthermore, women had a higher 1-year mortality rate (3.7% vs 2.7%, p = 0.002) than men; 30-day major bleeding was the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality in women (hazard ratio 2.48, 95% confidence interval 1.57 to 3.91, p = 0.001). Bivalirudin therapy in women reduced 30-day non-CABG-related major bleeding (5.6% vs 9.7%, p <0.0001) and 1-year mortality (2.9% vs 4.4%, p = 0.02) compared to standard therapy. In conclusion, in this cohort of patients treated for acute coronary syndrome and ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, women have a near 2-fold increase in bleeding complications compared to men after PCI. Bleeding complications rather than gender is the strongest independent predictor of 1-year mortality in patients undergoing PCI. Furthermore, we observed a more pronounced clinical benefit in women treated with bivalirudin including a 44% reduction in major bleeding and a significant reduction in mortality rates at 1 year.
Subject(s)
Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hirudins/administration & dosage , Myocardial Infarction/therapy , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Percutaneous Coronary Intervention/methods , Aged , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Argentina/epidemiology , Electrocardiography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hemorrhage/mortality , Hirudins/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , Time Factors , United Kingdom/epidemiology , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Chronic anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) prevents ischaemic stroke and systemic embolism in people with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) but dose adjustment, coagulation monitoring and bleeding limits its use. Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are under investigation as potential alternatives. OBJECTIVES: To assess (1) the comparative efficacy of long-term anticoagulation using DTIs versus VKAs on vascular deaths and ischaemic events in people with non-valvular AF, and (2) the comparative safety of chronic anticoagulation using DTIs versus VKAs on (a) fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events including haemorrhagic strokes, (b) adverse events other than bleeding and ischaemic events that lead to treatment discontinuation and (c) all-cause mortality in people with non-valvular AF. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (July 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), (The Cochrane Library, May 2013), MEDLINE (1950 to July 2013), EMBASE (1980 to October 2013), LILACS (1982 to October 2013) and trials registers (September 2013). We also searched the websites of clinical trials and pharmaceutical companies and handsearched the reference lists of articles and conference proceedings. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DTIs versus VKAs for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in people with non-valvular AF. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All three review authors independently performed data extraction and assessment of risk of bias. Primary analyses compared all DTIs combined versus warfarin. We performed post hoc analyses excluding ximelagatran because this drug was withdrawn from the market owing to safety concerns. MAIN RESULTS: We included eight studies involving a total of 27,557 participants with non-valvular AF and one or more risk factors for stroke; 26,601 of them were assigned to standard doses groups and included in the primary analysis. The DTIs: dabigatran 110 mg twice daily and 150 mg twice daily (three studies, 12,355 participants), AZD0837 300 mg once per day (two studies, 233 participants) and ximelagatran 36 mg twice per day (three studies, 3726 participants) were compared with the VKA warfarin (10,287 participants). Overall risk of bias and statistical heterogeneity of the studies included were low.The odds of vascular death and ischaemic events were not significantly different between all DTIs and warfarin (odds ratio (OR) 0.94, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.85 to 1.05). Sensitivity analysis by dose of dabigatran on reduction in ischaemic events and vascular mortality indicated that dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was superior to warfarin although the effect estimate was of borderline statistical significance (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75 to 0.99). Sensitivity analyses by other factors did not alter the results. Fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events, including haemorrhagic strokes, were less frequent with the DTIs (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.97). Adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment were significantly more frequent with the DTIs (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.82 to 2.61). All-cause mortality was similar between DTIs and warfarin (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.01). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: DTIs were as efficacious as VKAs for the composite outcome of vascular death and ischaemic events and only the dose of dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was found to be superior to warfarin. DTIs were associated with fewer major haemorrhagic events, including haemorrhagic strokes. Adverse events that led to discontinuation of treatment occurred more frequently with the DTIs. We detected no difference in death from all causes.
Subject(s)
Antithrombins/therapeutic use , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Embolism/prevention & control , Stroke/prevention & control , Vitamin K/antagonists & inhibitors , Amidines/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Azetidines/adverse effects , Azetidines/therapeutic use , Benzimidazoles/therapeutic use , Benzylamines/adverse effects , Benzylamines/therapeutic use , Dabigatran , Drug Administration Schedule , Embolism/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals , Stroke/etiology , Warfarin/therapeutic use , beta-Alanine/analogs & derivatives , beta-Alanine/therapeutic useABSTRACT
CONTEXT: The red algae Gelidium crinale (Turner) Gaillon (Gelidiaceae), encountered along the Southeast and Northeast Brazilian sea coast, contains a sulfated galactan presenting a similar saccharide backbone compared to λ carrageenan. Inflammatory effects of other galactans were reported, but not for that obtained from G. crinale (SG-Gc). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the in vivo edematogenic effect of SG-Gc in comparison to λ carrageenan. METHODS: SG-Gc was isolated by ion exchange chromatography. Paw edema was induced by subcutaneous (s.c.) intraplantar injection of SG-Gc or λ carrageenan and evaluated by hydroplethysmometry. Data were expressed as the increase in paw volume subtracted from the basal volume or area under curve-AUC. To investigate the participation of early and late-phase inflammatory mediators, rats were treated with pyrilamine, compound 48/80, indomethacin, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME), or pentoxifylline before SG-Gc. RESULTS: SG-Gc edematogenic effect was initiated at 0.5 h, peaked at 2 h (1.26 ± 0.05 mL) and lasted until 6 h (0.21 ± 0.03 mL), whereas the carrageenan-induced edema started at 1 h. The first phase (1-3 h) of SG-Gc-induced edema was 176 ± 15 (AUC) versus carrageenan (114.5 ± 14), whereas the second phase (3-5 h) was 95 ± 12 (AUC) versus carrageenan (117.5 ± 11). Treatment with compound 48/80, pyrilamine, indomethacin, L-NAME, and pentoxifylline inhibited the effect of SG-Gc by 32, 40, 69, 72, and 49%, respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: SG-Gc and λ carrageenan induce different profile of inflammatory response in the paw edema model, that involves histamine, cytokines, prostaglandins, and nitric oxide (NO), but with different degree of participation.
Subject(s)
Edema/chemically induced , Galactans/adverse effects , Rhodophyta/chemistry , Animals , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/therapeutic use , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antithrombins/antagonists & inhibitors , Antithrombins/chemistry , Antithrombins/isolation & purification , Atlantic Ocean , Brazil , Carrageenan/adverse effects , Carrageenan/chemistry , Edema/immunology , Edema/metabolism , Edema/prevention & control , Galactans/antagonists & inhibitors , Galactans/chemistry , Galactans/isolation & purification , Inflammation Mediators/antagonists & inhibitors , Inflammation Mediators/metabolism , Kinetics , Male , Molecular Structure , Rats , Rats, Wistar , Subcutaneous Tissue/drug effects , Subcutaneous Tissue/immunology , Subcutaneous Tissue/metabolismABSTRACT
Currently, the wide variety of antithrombotic agents as adjunctive pharmacological therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in the setting of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) available for clinical use has made choosing the optimal drug therapy a complex and difficult task. In the stent era, bivalirudin, a semisynthetic direct thrombin inhibitor, has recently been shown to provide similar efficacy with less bleeding compared with unfractionated heparin plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in ACS patients treated with PCI. Although there are some controversial results and limitations in the studies with bivalirudin, this drug certainly is a plausible option in the treatment of ACS. With current findings in contemporary PCI, there may be a steady increase in the utilization of bivalirudin. On the other hand, in the real world, there may be reinforcement in the sole use of unfractionated heparin confining glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and other intravenous antithrombotics to bailout therapy for periprocedural PCI complications in ACS patients.
Subject(s)
Acute Coronary Syndrome/therapy , Blood Coagulation/drug effects , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Heparin , Hirudins , Peptide Fragments , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Acute Coronary Syndrome/diagnosis , Acute Coronary Syndrome/metabolism , Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary/methods , Antithrombins/administration & dosage , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antithrombins/pharmacokinetics , Combined Modality Therapy , Electrocardiography , Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Hemorrhage/metabolism , Heparin/administration & dosage , Heparin/adverse effects , Heparin/pharmacokinetics , Hirudins/administration & dosage , Hirudins/adverse effects , Hirudins/pharmacokinetics , Humans , Peptide Fragments/administration & dosage , Peptide Fragments/adverse effects , Peptide Fragments/pharmacokinetics , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacokinetics , Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex/antagonists & inhibitors , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/pharmacokinetics , Therapeutic EquivalencyABSTRACT
Ticks are blood-feeding arthropods that secrete anticoagulant molecules to maintain the fluidity of the blood during its feeding. Tick saliva has many compounds with biological activities that interact directly with host systems, such as blood clotting, platelet aggregation, cell death, among others. Some reports show that there are proteins with anticancer properties in tick saliva. This paper reports some of the biological roles of the Amblyomma cajennense tick saliva, including Factor Xa and thrombin inhibition, action on platelet aggregation, and also preliminary cytotoxic effects on tumor cell lines. The crude saliva was tested in the coagulation, fibrinolysis and platelet aggregation systems. The protein profile of the crude saliva was examined through anion exchange chromatography performed in a FPLC system. The chromatography separated seven protein fractions (Pools I to VII), which biological activities were evaluated. Moreover, the cytotoxic effects of the crude saliva were evaluated on SK-MEL-28 (melanoma cells) and MIA PaCa-2 (pancreas adenocarcinoma cells) using the MTT assay, flow cytometry and fluorescence microscopy. The crude saliva was able to induce cell death on both cancer cells lines, and, interestingly, the cytotoxic effects were not observed on human fibroblasts, which were used as control. The present work opens perspectives for the characterization and development of new molecules involved in the hemostatic system and in cancer control.
Subject(s)
Anticoagulants/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Drug Discovery , Hemostasis/drug effects , Ixodidae/metabolism , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Saliva/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Animals , Anticoagulants/adverse effects , Anticoagulants/isolation & purification , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Agents/isolation & purification , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Antithrombins/isolation & purification , Antithrombins/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Cell Line, Tumor , Factor Xa Inhibitors , Female , Humans , Insect Proteins/adverse effects , Insect Proteins/isolation & purification , Insect Proteins/pharmacology , Male , Melanoma/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/isolation & purification , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/pharmacologySubject(s)
Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones/pharmacology , Antithrombins/pharmacology , Fibrinolytic Agents/pharmacology , Thrombocytopenia/chemically induced , Thrombosis/prevention & control , Amino Acid Chloromethyl Ketones/adverse effects , Amino Acid Sequence , Animals , Antithrombins/adverse effects , Fibrinolytic Agents/adverse effects , Male , Molecular Sequence Data , RabbitsABSTRACT
Se presenta el caso de un paciente con fenomenos tromboticos y deficiencia comprobada de At. III. Se discute la importancia de esta proteina en los trastornos de Hipercoagulabilidad y se dan recomendaciones para el tratamiento