Individualized C1-2 intra-articular three-dimensional printed porous titanium alloy cage for craniovertebral deformity.

BACKGROUND: Congenital craniovertebral deformity, including basilar invagination (BI) and atlantoaxial instability (AAI), are often associated with three-dimensional (3D) deformity, such as C1-2 rotational deformity, craniocervical kyphosis, C1 lateral inclination, among other abnormalities. Effective management of these conditions requires the restoration of the 3D alignment to achieve optimal reduction. Recently, 3D printing technology has emerged as a valuable tool in spine surgery, offering the significant advantage of allowing surgeons to customize the prosthesis design. This innovation provides an ideal solution for precise 3D reduction in the treatment of craniovertebral deformities. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe our approach to individualized computer-simulated reduction and the design of C1-2 intra-articular 3D printed porous titanium alloy cages for the quantitative correction of craniovertebral junction deformities. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with craniovertebral deformities treated at our institution using individualized 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cages. Preoperative CT data were used to construct models for 3D realignment simulations. Cage designs were tailored to the simulated joint morphology following computer-assisted realignment. Preoperative and postoperative parameters were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Fourteen patients were included in the study, with a total of 28 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cages implanted. There were no cases of C2 nerve root resection or vertebral artery injury. All patients experienced symptom relief and stable implant fixation achieved in all cases. No implant-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: The use of individualized computer-simulated reduction and the design of C1-2 intra-articular 3D printed porous titanium alloy cage facilitates precise 3D realignment in patients with craniovertebral deformities, demonstrating effectiveness in symptom relief and stability.

Database Review of 514 Patients with Os Odontoideum. Detailed Analysis of 258 Surgically Treated (1978-2019).

OBJECTIVE: Database review (1978-2019) is to identify the cause of os odontoideum, its presentation, associated abnormalities, and management recommendations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Review of referral database of 514 patients and 258 surgically treated patients ages 4-64 years. Detailed history of early childhood trauma and initial encounter record retrieval were made. Patients had dynamic motion radiographs, dynamic motion MRI and also CT to identify pathology and reducibility of craniocervical instability. Preoperative crown halo traction was made before the year 2000 except in children. Intraoperative traction with O-arm/CT documentation was made since 2001. Reducible and partially reducible cases underwent halo traction under general anesthesia distraction, dorsal stabilization, and rib graft augmentation for fusion. Later semi-rigid instrumentation and subsequently rigid instrumentation was made. Irreducible compression of cervicomedullary junction was treated with ventral decompression. The follow up was 3-20 years. RESULTS: Database; acute worsening after trauma 262, insidious neurological deficit 252. Minimal/normal motion with neurological deficit was present in 18, previous C1-C2 fusion with worsening in 18. 28 patients of 64 without treatment worsened in 4 years. An intact odontoid process was seen in 52 children of 156 who had early craniovertebral junction trauma and later developed os odontoideum. SURGICAL EXPERIENCE: There were 174 patients with reducible lesions and partially reducible were 22. Irreducible lesions were 62. Of the reducible, 50 underwent transarticular C1-C2 fusion, 26 C1 lateral mass, and C2 pars screw fixation. 182 had occipitocervical fusion (19 had extension of previous C1-C2 fusion and 43 after transoral decompression). 62 with irreducible ventral compression of the cervicomedullary junction underwent transoral decompression; 43 had a trapped transverse ligament between the os and C2 body and 19 previous C1-C2 fusions. Compression was by the axis body, os odontoideum, and the posterior C2 arch. Syndromic and skeletal/connective tissue abnormalities were found in 86 (36%). COMPLICATIONS: 2 patients worsened, age 10 and 62, due to failure of semi-rigid construct. CONCLUSIONS: The etiology of os odontoideum is multifactorial considering the associated abnormalities, reports of congenital-familiar occurrence, and early childhood craniovertebral trauma which also plays a role in the etiology. Patients with reducible lesions require stabilization. Asymptomatic patients are at risk for later instability. Patients who underwent childhood C1-C2 fusion must be followed for later problems. The irreducibility was seen due to trapped transverse ligament, pannus, or previous dorsal C1-C2 fusion.

Odontoid Fracture with Locked Posterolateral Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

CASE: Odontoid fractures with atlantoaxial dislocations are rare injuries. We report a case of a 41-year-old man with a Type 2 odontoid fracture with locket facet and posterolateral dislocation. He underwent single-stage C1-C4 posterior fixation and fusion, and at 2-year follow-up, he is symptom-free without any residual pain. Follow-up radiograph and CT scan show healed odontoid fracture with posterior fusion. CONCLUSION: This case highlights successful management of a complex odontoid fracture by a single-stage posterior surgery. Closed reduction is usually unsuccessful, and open reduction using posterior approach is preferable.

A screw algorithm for congenital C2-3 fusion with high-riding vertebral arteries: feasibilities and clinical outcomes of five different fixation techniques.

OBJECTIVE: To propose a screw algorithm and investigate the anatomical feasibilities and clinical outcomes of five distinct fixation methods for C2-3 fused vertebra with high-ridding vertebral arteries (VA) (HRVA) when the C2 pedicle screw placement is unfeasible. METHODS: Thirty surgical patients with congenital C2-3 fusion, HRVA, and atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) were included. We designed a algorithm for alternative screw implantation into C2-3 fused vertebrae, including C2 pedicle screw with in-out-in (passing VA groove) technique (in-out-in screw), subfacetal screw, translaminar screw, lateral mass screw, C3 pedicle screw. VA diameter and position, C2 and C3 pedicles, superior facets, fused lamina, and fused lateral mass dimensions were evaluated for screw implantation indication. Implant failure, reduction loss, implant placement accuracy were investigated by computed tomography. RESULTS: A total of 5 VAs were identified as distant VAs; a total of 2 VAs were categorized as occlusive VAs. Sufficient dimension of lateral mass and lamina provided the broadest indications for screw implantation, while the distant or occlusive VA provided the most limited indications for in-out-in screw. The indications of five alternative methods ranged from narrowest to widest as follows: in-out-in screw, C3 pedicle screw, subfacetal screw, translaminar screw, lateral mass screw. The translaminar screws and the lateral mass screws increased the probability of implant failure. All patients who received in-out-in screws, C3 pedicle screws, and subfacetal screws achieved fusion. The accuracy ranged from lowest to highest as follows: C3 pedicle screw, lateral mass screw, in-out-in screw, subfacetal screw, translaminar screw. No translaminar screws deviated. CONCLUSIONS: The algorithm proved to be a valuable tool for screw selection in cases of C2-3 fused vertebrae with HRVAs. The subfacetal screw, boasting broad indications, a high fusion rate, and exceptional accuracy, stood as the primary preferred alternative.

[Effectiveness comparison of robot-assisted and traditional freehand technology in treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted and traditional freehand screw placement in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. Methods: The clinical data of 55 patients with atlantoaxial dislocation who met the selection criteria between January 2021 and January 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. According to different screw placement methods, they were divided into the traditional group (using the traditional freedhand screw placement, 31 cases) and the robot group (using the Mazor X robot-assisted screw placement, 24 cases). There was no significant difference in gender, age, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cervical spine Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, operation cost, and intraoperative complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. The VAS score and cervical spine JOA score were used to evaluate the improvement of pain and cervical spinal cord function before operation and at 1 month after operation. CT examination was performed at 3 days after operation, and the accuracy of screw placement was evaluated according to Neo grading criteria. Results: All the 55 patients successfully completed the operation. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and operation cost in the robot group were significantly higher than those in the traditional group ( P<0.05). A total of 220 C 1 and C 2 pedicle screws were inserted in the two groups, and 94 were inserted in the robot group, with an accuracy rate of 95.7%, among them, 2 were inserted by traditional freehand screw placement due to bleeding caused by intraoperative slip. And 126 pedicle screws were inserted in the traditional group, with an accuracy rate of 87.3%, which was significantly lower than that in the robot group ( P<0.05). There were 1 case of venous plexus injury in the robot group and 3 cases in the traditional group, which improved after pressure hemostasis treatment. No other intraoperative complication such as vertebral artery injury or spinal cord injury occurred in both groups. All patients were followed up 4-16 months with an average of 6.6 months, and there was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). Postoperative neck pain significantly relieved in both groups, and neurological symptoms relieved to varying degrees. The VAS score and cervicle spine JOA score of both groups significantly improved at 1 month after operation when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the score change between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: In the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation, the accuracy of robot-assisted screw placement is superior to the traditional freedhand screw placement.

[Comparative study of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for reversible atlantoaxial dislocation].

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of computer-assisted and robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation for the treatment of reversible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). Methods: The clinical data of 42 patients with reversible AAD admitted between January 2020 and June 2023 and met the selection criteria were retrospectively analyzed, of whom 23 patients were treated with computer-assisted surgery (computer group) and 19 patients were treated with Mazor X spinal robot-assisted surgery (robot group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, T value of bone mineral density, body mass index, etiology, and preoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, Neck Dysfunction Index (NDI) between the two groups ( P>0.05). The operation time, screw implantation time, intraoperative blood loss, hand and wrist radiation exposure, and complications were recorded and compared between the two groups. Gertzbein classification was used to evaluate the accuracy of screw implantation. JOA score and NDI were used to evaluate the function before operation, at 3 days after operation, and at last follow-up. At last follow-up, the status of screws and bone fusion were observed by neck three-dimensional CT. Results: The operation time and hand and wrist radiation exposure of the computer group were significantly longer than those of the robot group ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in the screw implantation time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups ( P>0.05). All patients were followed up 11-24 months, with an average of 19.6 months. There was no significant difference in the follow-up time between the two groups ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy of screw implantation between the two groups ( P>0.05). Except for 1 case of incision infection in the computer group, which improved after antibiotic treatment, there was no complication such as nerve and vertebral artery injury, screw loosening, or breakage in the two groups. The JOA score and NDI significantly improved in both groups at 3 days after operation and at last follow-up ( P<0.05) compared to those before operation, but there was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05). At last follow-up, 21 patients (91.3%) in the computer group and 18 patients (94.7%) in the robot group achieved satisfactory atlantoaxial fusion, and there was no significant difference in the fusion rate between the two groups ( P>0.05). Conclusion: Computer-assisted or robot-assisted atlantoaxial pedicle screw implantation is safe and effective, and robotic navigation shortens operation time and reduces radiation exposure.

Calvarial bone graft for craniovertebral junction fixation in children.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of calvarial graft (CG) in craniovertebral fusion procedures in children at a single single center. METHODS: Paediatric patients in whom CG had been used as the sole construct, or to augment a semi-rigid construct were identified from a prospective operative database. Age, underlying diagnosis and clinical presentation were obtained from review of the electronic patient record. The primary outcome was bony fusion confirmed on CT. Additional outcome measures were donor site morbidity and need for further surgery. RESULTS: From 82 paediatric CVJ procedures, CG was used in 15 patients with a mean age of 4.1 (± 3.52) years. Aetiology comprised skeletal dysplasia (n = 12), congenital anomaly of segmentation (n = 1) and cervical trauma (n = 2). Myelopathy was the most common clinical finding (9/15), followed by cervical pain (3/15). The indications for surgery comprised atlanto-axial subluxation (8/15), basilar invagination with compression (2/15), and cervicomedullary compression without instability but deemed at risk of instability following decompression (4/15). CG was used in three scenarios: (i) CG + wire only (n = 10); (ii) CG + semirigid instrumentation (n = 3); (iii) CG to augment rigid instrumented fixation (n = 2). In 13 patients a Halo-body Jacket was used peri-operatively. At a mean time of 4.4 months following surgery, 80% of cases had radiological evidence of fusion. CONCLUSION: Full thickness calvarial bone graft is readily available, has good structural integrity and is associated with minimal donor site morbidity. CG should be considered for use as a sole construct, or to augment semi-rigid constructs when instrumented fixation is precluded.

Sagittal slope angle of lateral atlantoaxial articulation is associated with the severity of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation and predicts reduction degree after surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate (1) lateral atlantoaxial articulation (LAA) morphology in patients with basilar invagination (BI) with atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) and healthy individuals and its relationship with the severity of dislocation and (2) the effect of the LAA morphology on reduction degree (RD) after surgery. METHODS: In this retrospective propensity score matching case-control study, imaging and baseline data of 62 patients with BI and AAD from 2011 to 2022 were collected. Six hundred thirteen  participants without occipitocervical junctional deformity served as controls. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve were used for analysis. RESULTS: The age, BMI and sex did not differ significantly between the two groups after propensity score matching. Sagittal slope angle (SSA) and coronal slope angle (CSA) was lower and greater, respectively, in the patient group than in the control group. A negative SSA value usually indicates anteverted LAA. Regression analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between SSA and severity of dislocation. However, no relationship was found between CSA and the severity of dislocation. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that minimum-SSA emerged as an independent predictor of satisfactory reduction (RD ≥ 90%). The ROC curve demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.844, with a cut-off value set at -40.2. CONCLUSION: SSA in patients group was significantly smaller and more asymmetric than that in the control group. Dislocation severity was related to SSA but not to CSA. Minimum-SSA can be used as a predictor of horizontal RD after surgery.

Augmented Reality in Spine Surgery: A Case Study of Atlantoaxial Instrumentation in Os Odontoideum.

Despite advancement in surgical innovation, C1-C2 fixation remains challenging due to risks of screw malposition and vertebral artery (VA) injuries. Traditional image-based navigation, while useful, often demands that surgeons frequently shift their attention to external monitors, potentially causing distractions. In this article, we introduce a microscope-based augmented reality (AR) navigation system that projects both anatomical information and real-time navigation images directly onto the surgical field. In the present case report, we discuss a 37-year-old female who suffered from os odontoideum with C1-C2 subluxation. Employing AR-assisted navigation, the patient underwent the successful posterior instrumentation of C1-C2. The integrated AR system offers direct visualization, potentially minimizing surgical distractions. In our opinion, as AR technology advances, its adoption in surgical practices and education is anticipated to expand.

A Staged Approach for Surgical Management of Basilar Invagination.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Patients with basilar invagination (BI) can be treated with several surgical options, ranging from simple posterior decompression to circumferential decompression and fusion. Here, we aimed at examining the indications and outcomes associated with these surgical strategies to devise a staged algorithm for managing BI. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in 2 neurosurgical centers and included patients with a BI, as defined by a position of the dens tip at least 5 mm above the Chamberlain line. Other craniovertebral junction anomalies, such as atlas assimilation, platybasia, and Chiari malformations, were documented. C1-C2 stability was assessed with a dynamic computed tomography scan. RESULTS: We included 30 patients with BI with a mean follow-up of 56 months (min = 12, max = 166). Posterior decompression and fusion (n = 8) was only performed in cases of obvious atlanto-axial instability (eg, increased atlanto-dental interval or hypermobility on flexion/extension), while anterior decompression (transoral or transnasal) was reserved to patients with lower cranial nerves deficits (eg, swallowing dysfunction) and irreducible anterior compression (n = 9). Patients with posterior signs (eg, Valsalva headaches) or myelopathy but without C1-C2 instability nor anterior signs were managed with an isolated foramen magnum decompression, with or without duraplasty (n = 13). Complications were more frequent for combined procedures, including neurological deterioriation (n = 4) and tracheostomy (n = 2), but reinterventions were more likely in patients undergoing posterior decompression alone (n = 3). CONCLUSION: Patient selection is key to determine the appropriate surgical strategy for BI: In our experience, combined approaches are only needed for patients with irreducible and symptomatic anterior compression, while fusion should be restricted to patient with obvious signs of atlanto-axial instability. Other BI patients can be managed by foramen magnum decompression alone to minimize surgical morbidity.

Intraoperative Ultrasonography for the Surgical Treatment of Grisel Syndrome of the Adult: Management of A Rare Condition.

STUDY DESIGN: This is a narrative review and case report. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature concerning Grisel syndrome physiopathology, diagnosis, and surgical reports, highlighting the decision-making for treatment and its timing. We describe the role of intraoperative US in the management of 2 cases of GS of the adult. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: GS is a rare nontraumatic post inflammatory C1-C2 rotatory instability usually affecting children; adult cases are even rarer, and the role of surgical treatment is not well defined. CASE DISCUSSION: Case 1: A 72-year-old man with upper cervical pain and no neurological deficit; radiologic examination revealed C1-C2 spondylitis and epidural abscess. After antibiotic therapy, the patient developed cervical instability. Hence, surgical decompression and C1-C2 stabilization were performed. Case 2: An 82-year-old woman with progressive right hemiparesis. CT and MRI showed C1-C2 spondylitis with retro-odontoid epidural abscess. Atlanto-axial rotatory instability was evident so surgery was achieved. In both cases, intraoperative US was useful for localizing retro-odontoid abscess and allowing safe puncture of the collection, leading to its remarkable radiologic reduction. CONCLUSION: GS in adults remains a challenge: Patients should be closely monitored concerning neurological and inflammatory status. We describe the successful use of intraoperative US for draining retro-odontoid abscess for the first time, with satisfactory postoperative outcome without need of circumferential approach.

Autologous rib grafts for craniocervical junction surgery in children: a clinical application.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous iliac bone is commonly used as a bone graft material to achieve solid fusion in craniocervical junction (CVJ) surgery. However, the developing iliac bone of children is less than ideal as a bone graft material. The matured rib bone of children presents a potential substitute material for iliac bone. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of autologous rib grafts for craniocervical junction surgery in children. METHODS: The outcomes of 10 children with abnormalities of the craniocervical junction who underwent craniocervical junction surgery between January 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent posterior fusion and internal fixation surgery with autologous rib grafts. Pre- and post-operative images were obtained and clinical follow-ups were conducted to evaluate neurological function, pain level, donor site complications, and bone fusion rates. RESULTS: All surgeries were successful. During the 8- to 24-month follow-up period, all patients achieved satisfactory clinical results. Computed tomography at 3-6 months confirmed successful bone fusion and regeneration of the rib defect in all patients with no neurological or donor site complications. CONCLUSION: Autologous rib bone is a safe and effective material for bone grafting in craniocervical junction fusion surgery for children that can reduce the risks of donor site complications and increase the amount of bone graft, thereby achieving a higher bone fusion rate.

[Expert consensus on posterior facet distraction and fusion technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation(2024)].

Atlantoaxial dislocation is a common bony structural deformity in the craniovertebral junction area. It can cause severe neurological defects, seriously affect the patient's life quality, and even threaten the patient's life. The most effective treatment for patients with apparent clinically symptoms is surgical treatment. In recent years, with the development of surgical techniques, posterior facet distraction and fusion (PFDF) technique has gradually become an important technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. In order to better standardize the diagnosis and treatment of patients with atlantoaxial dislocation and the application of PFDF technique, based on the existing evidence, the Spine and Spinal Cord Group in Neurosurgical Society of Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Craniovertebral Junction Malformation Research Alliance and Craniovertebral Junction Malformation Alliance of National Center for Neurological Disorders organized experts in relevant fields to fully discuss and formulated the "Expert consensus on posterior facet distraction and fusion technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation（2024）". This consensus elaborates and recommends the preoperative evaluation, surgical techniques, and management of complications using PFDF technique for the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation. It is intended to provide guidance for surgeons who encounter problems in the treatment of atlantoaxial dislocation using PFDF technique.

The development of posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and its preliminary application in irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation.

OBJECTIVE: To develop posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation and evaluate the preliminary clinical application of this forceps in assisting simple posterior screw-rod system reduction and fixation in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. METHODS: Based on the posterior atlantoaxial screw-rod system, posterior reduction forceps was developed to assist simple posterior screw-rod system for the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. From January 2021 to October 2022, 10 cases with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation were treated with this technique. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score was applied before and after surgery to evaluate the neurological status of the patient, and the Atlanto-dental interval (ADI) was measured before and after surgery to evaluate the atlantoaxial reduction. X-ray and CT were performed to evaluate internal fixation, atlantoaxial sequence and bone graft fusion during regular follow-up. MRI was performed to evaluate the status of atlantoaxial reduction and spinal cord compression after surgery. RESULTS: All 10 patients were successfully operated, and there were no complications such as spinal nerve and vascular injury. Postoperative clinical symptoms were significantly relieved in all patients, and postoperative JOA score and ADI were significantly improved compared with those before surgery (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The developed posterior reduction forceps for atlantoaxial dislocation can assist the simple posterior screw-rod system in the treatment of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation to avoid the release in anterior or posterior approach and reduce the difficulty of surgery. The preliminary results of this technique are satisfactory and it has a good application prospect.

Atlantoaxial intra-articular cage fusion by posterior intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation: a technique note with case series.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical feasibility of atlantoaxial intra-articular cage (AIC) fusion via intermuscular approach for treating reducible atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). METHODS: An analysis was conducted on the data of 10 patients who underwent C1-C2 segmental fixation and AIC fusion for AAD by unilateral intermuscular approach and contralateral open approach. Outcome assessments included Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (JOA) and Visual Analog Scale Score for Neck Pain (VASSNP). The duration of surgical exposure, screw insertion and cage insertion, and postoperative drainage volume were also compared between two approaches. Bone fusion was evaluated through computed tomography (CT) reconstruction. Postoperative paravertebral tissue edema was evaluated by paravertebral tissue cross-sectional area (CSA) and signal intensity on T2 weighted sequence of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3 days postoperatively. RESULTS: The intermuscular approach exhibited a longer exposure time but lower drainage postoperatively compared to the open approach (P < 0.05). After operation, JOA scores significant improved (P < 0.05), while VASSNP scores significantly decreased (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in preoperative CSA between two approaches (P > 0.05). However, compared to the open approach, the intermuscular approach exhibited less CSA (P < 0.05) and lower T2 signal intensity on MRI postoperatively, indicating less invasive to the paravertebral tissues. CONCLUSIONS: AIC fusion by intermuscular approach is an effective and safe technique in the treatment of reducible AAD. Intermuscular approach could reduce the postoperative drainage volume and the extent of paravertebral tissue edema compared to open approach.

The C2 isthmus screw provided sufficient biomechanical stability in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation-a finite element study.

BACKGROUND: The emerging of the C2 isthmus screw fixation technique is gaining popularity in the setting of atlantoaxial dislocation or other conditions requiring fixation of C2. However, the biomechanical stability of this fixation is poorly understood. PURPOSE: To compare and elucidate the biomechanical stability of C2 pedicle screw (C2PS), C2 isthmus screw (C2IS) and C2 short isthmus screw (C2SIS) fixation techniques in atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD). METHOD: A three-dimensional finite element model (FEM) from occiput to C3 was established and validated from a healthy male volunteer. Three FEMs, C1 pedicle screw (PS)-C2PS, C1PS-C2IS, C1PS-C2SIS were also constructed. The range of motion (ROM) and the maximum von Mises stress under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation loading were analyzed and compared. The pullout strength of the three fixations for C2 was also evaluated. RESULT: C1PS-C2IS model showed the greatest decrease in ROM with flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. C1PS-C2PS model showed the least ROM reduction under all loading conditions than both C2IS and C2SIS. The C1PS-C2PS model had the largest von Mises stress on the screw under all directions followed by C1PS-C2SIS, and lastly the C1PS-C2IS. Under axial rotation and lateral bending loading, the three models showed the maximum and minimum von Mises stress on the screw respectively. The stress of the three models was mainly located in the connection of the screw and rod. Overall, the maximum screw pullout strength for C2PS, C2IS and C2SIS were 729.41N, 816.62N, 640.54N respectively. CONCLUSION: In patients with atlantoaxial dislocations, the C2IS fixation provided comparable stability, with no significant stress concentration. Furthermore, the C2IS had sufficient pullout strength when compared with C2PS and C2SIS. C2 isthmus screw fixation may be a biomechanically favourable option in cases with AAD. However, future clinical trials are necessary for the evaluation of the clinical outcomes of this technique.

Successful recovery from cardiac arrest due to atlantoaxial subluxation in Down syndrome: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Down syndrome is the most common chromosomal abnormality associated with intellectual impairments. Unexpected deaths are common with this disease. There are certain difficulties in clarifying the cause of death because the manifestations may be quite diverse and involve many organ systems. Atlantoaxial subluxation is a dangerous complication of Down syndrome, as it may lead to cervical cord-medullary compression. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we present a case of Down syndrome in a patient who completely recovered from cardiac arrest due to atlantoaxial subluxation. The neck was immobilized during post-cardiac arrest care, and the patient underwent surgery after 14 days. The patient could walk independently and was discharged 3 months later. At the last follow-up 5 years after surgery, the patient's general condition was good. DISCUSSION: Physicians should be aware that atlantoaxial instability can cause cardiac arrest in patients with genetic syndromes.

Two-level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion versus Posterior Open-door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Comparison of the Clinical Impact on the Occipito-Atlantoaxial Complex.

OBJECTIVE: Both two-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (t-ACCF) and posterior open-door laminoplasty (ODLP) are effective surgical procedures for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). Previous studies have identified different effects of different surgical procedures on the upper and subaxial cervical spine (UCS, SCS), however, there are no studies on the effects of t-ACCF and ODLP on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the changes in sagittal parameters and range of motion (ROM) of the occipito-atlantoaxial complex in OPLL patients treated with t-ACCF and ODLP. METHODS: This was a retrospective study that included 74 patients who underwent t-ACCF or ODLP for the treatment of OPLL from January 2012 to August 2022 at our institution. Preoperative, 3-month, and 1-year postoperative cervical neutral, flexion-extension, and lateral flexion radiographs were taken. Sagittal parameters including Cobb angle of C2-7, C0-2, C0-1, C1-2, C2 slope, and the ROM were measured. The clinical outcome was assessed using the JOA, VAS, and NDI scores preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Multiple linear regression was employed to identify factors influencing changes in UCS. RESULTS: In the ODLP group, the SCS (C2-7) Cobb angle was significantly reduced (12.85 ± 10.0 to 7.68 ± 11.27; p < 0.05), and the UCS (C0-2) Cobb angle was significantly compensated for at 1 year postoperatively compared with the t-ACCF group (3.05 ± 4.09 vs 0.79 ± 2.62; p < 0.01). The SCS and lateral flexion ROM of the ODLP group was better maintained than t-ACCF (14.51 ± 6.00 vs 10.72 ± 3.79; 6.87 ± 4.56 vs 3.81 ± 1.67; p < 0.01). The compensatory increase in C0-2, C0-1, and C1-2 ROM was pronounced in both groups, especially in the ODLP group. The results of multiple linear regression showed that only the surgical procedure was a significant factor influencing UCS. CONCLUSION: The loss of the SCS Cobb angle was more pronounced in ODLP relative to t-ACCF, resulting in a significant compensatory increase in UCS and atlantoaxial Cobb angle. The ROM of the UCS, atlantooccipital, and atlantoaxial joints was significantly increased in both groups, this may accelerate degenerative changes in the occipital-atlantoaxial complex, may leading to poorer outcomes in the long-term; of these, ODLP should receive more attention. In contrast, t-ACCF better maintains normal curvature of the SCS and occipito-atlantoaxial complex but loses more ROM.