Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 3.196
Filter
1.
Folia Med (Plovdiv) ; 66(4): 578-582, 2024 Aug 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39257261

ABSTRACT

Polyacrylamide hydrogel mammoplasty is a simple and relatively affordable surgery. However, this procedure is associated with a significant frequency of late complications, prompting its suspension in 2006. Despite this, patients continue facing long-term consequences. These include hydrogel migration, changes in breast shape and volume, granulomas, fistulas, and abscess formation. The clinical case described here presents the surgical treatment after augmentation mammoplasty with polyacrylamide hydrogel performed 35 years ago.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Mammaplasty/methods , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Middle Aged
2.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 97: 302-309, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39213931

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Indocyanine green (ICG) angiography for the intraoperative evaluation of tissue perfusion is commonly used in implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR). The assessment of ICG images depends on the surgeon's interpretation and is qualitative or semiqualitative in nature. To quantify ICG metrics, this study aimed to apply a novel assessment of fill-rate dynamics to predict wound-healing complications and provide pragmatic assessment tools in IBR. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent IBR with ICG using the photodynamic eye (PDE-Neo II) qualitative imaging system between April 2021 and September 2023. ICG recordings were reviewed to quantify the relative surface area and fluorescence intensity of visual perfusion deficits using ImageJ. The primary outcome was the incidence of wound-healing complications. t-tests and logistic regression were performed for statistical testing. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (201 breasts) were included. The incidence of wound-healing complications was 12.9%. A higher relative surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (3.3% vs. 0.90%; p = 0.001). The rate of change in the surface area of ischemic regions was significantly associated with wound-healing complications (0.35% per second vs. 1.29% per second; p = 0.003%). On average, the duration of transient ischemic areas was significantly longer in breasts with wound-healing complications (46.0 s vs. 36.0 s, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: A transient ischemic area of > 5% of the breast and/or failure to resolve transient ischemic areas after 60 s may predict wound-healing complications and inform surgical reconstructive decision-making in IBR.


Subject(s)
Indocyanine Green , Postoperative Complications , Wound Healing , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/diagnosis , Wound Healing/physiology , Coloring Agents/administration & dosage , Adult , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Angiography/methods , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Fluorescein Angiography/methods
3.
Breast ; 77: 103782, 2024 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39111201

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Post-mastectomy radiation therapy is an important component of adjuvant therapy for high-risk patients. However, radiation to reconstructed breasts can cause various complications. Recently, hypofractionated (HF) protocols have been adopted in several countries. Here, we aimed to assess the impact of HF protocols on implant-reconstructed breasts through a meta-analysis and systematic review of the currently available literature. METHODS: Records published until August 2023 were systematically searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. Keywords included hypofractionation radiotherapy, mastectomy, and breast reconstruction. Studies that utilized HF and conventional fractionation (CF) after prosthetic reconstruction were selected. Due to the rarity of events in outcomes, Mantel-Haenszel's odds ratios were calculated using a fixed-effect model to compare the complication rates between HF and CF groups. For analysis with high heterogeneity, a random effect model was used. RESULTS: Seven articles with 924 implant reconstructions, in which 506 (54.8 %) underwent HF were included. HF patients received 43.8 Gy on average, while CF patients received 51.2 Gy. Mean follow-up ranged from 10.6 to 35 months. Seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. HF groups had a significantly lower risk of capsular contracture (OR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.11-0.55), major revision surgery (OR 0.19, 95 % CI 0.05-0.80), and wound dehiscence (OR 0.24, 95 % CI 0.07-0.78) compared to CF groups. The risks of other complications were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that HF protocols are associated with fewer complications than CF protocols in implant-reconstructed patients. These findings suggest that the application of HF PMRT in implant-reconstructed patients with breast cancer is plausible.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Neoplasms , Mastectomy , Postoperative Complications , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Female , Humans , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/methods
4.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(31): e39074, 2024 Aug 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39093798

ABSTRACT

RATIONALE: Complications associated with breast implants pose a significant obstacle to improving the quality of life for patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction. Due to the intricate nature of their presentation, diagnosis often becomes challenging and perplexing. Herein, we present a case report detailing the diagnostic and therapeutic processes employed in managing implant-related complications in a patient with multiple malignancies who underwent immediate breast reconstruction following mastectomy. PATENT CONCERNS: The patient, a 48-year-old woman, presented with severe pain and hardening in her left breast. She had previously undergone nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by immediate implant-based breast reconstruction 3 years ago. DIAGNOSES: Upon admission, we suspected a simple diagnosis of capsular contracture. However, upon investigation, she had a medical history of colon cancer, breast cancer, and acute B-lymphoblastic leukemia. Furthermore, she recently experienced nipple hemorrhage. INTERVENTIONS: Considering her clinical manifestations, we postulated the possibility of tumor recurrence along with potential presence of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma. The situation took a new turn, as diagnostic imaging techniques including breast MRI, and ultrasound revealed indications of potential prosthesis rupture and periprosthetic infection. OUTCOMES: Ultimately, en bloc capsulectomy with implant removal was performed, revealing no evidence of implant rupture or infection but rather indicating delayed hematoma formation. LESSONS: An accurate diagnosis of complications associated with breast prosthesis reconstruction is crucial for effective treatment. The examination and treatment processes employed in this case offer valuable insights toward achieving a more precise diagnosis of prosthesis-related complications, particularly in patients with complex medical histories.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants , Breast Neoplasms , Hematoma , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Hematoma/etiology , Hematoma/surgery , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Implant Capsular Contracture/etiology , Implant Capsular Contracture/surgery , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods
5.
Ann Plast Surg ; 93(2S Suppl 1): S47-S50, 2024 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39101848

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infection of breast implants can lead to implant removal and other complications. This study aimed to investigate the presence of costal cartilage infection following breast implant surgery and the diagnostic role of PET/CT in identifying this rare complication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study included 16 patients with persistent infections after breast implant removal surgery. Patients underwent PET/CT scans before surgery, and surgical plans were made based on PET/CT findings. Surgical procedures were guided by PET/CT, and specimens were collected for pathological examination and microbiological culture. Follow-up assessments were performed at 1, 3, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Among the 16 patients, 11 were diagnosed with costal cartilage infection, whereas 5 had subcutaneous soft tissue infections. PET/CT accurately identified costal cartilage infection in all cases and localized the infected costal cartilage in the majority of cases. Microbiological culture results showed various pathogens. All patients were cured with one or staged surgery. CONCLUSION: Costal cartilage infection following breast implant surgery is a significant concern. PET/CT plays a crucial role in the accurate diagnosis and localization of infected costal cartilage, aiding in appropriate surgical management. Patients should be closely monitored for the possibility of costal cartilage infection when experiencing persistent symptoms after breast implant surgery.


Subject(s)
Breast Implantation , Breast Implants , Costal Cartilage , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Adult , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Costal Cartilage/transplantation , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnosis , Prosthesis-Related Infections/diagnostic imaging , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Device Removal , Aged
9.
Ann Chir Plast Esthet ; 69(5): 457-464, 2024 Sep.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39003220

ABSTRACT

Necrotizing fasciitis is a rapidly progressive soft tissue infection extending from the skin to the fascia, resulting in extensive necrosis. It is a very rare but serious complication, with mortality ranging from 10 to 15%. Optimal management involves early diagnosis followed by treatment combining antibiotic therapy and wide surgical removal as soon as possible. Localisation in the breast is uncommon. Although most cases are primary necrotizing fasciitis of the breast, several cases of necrotizing fasciitis have been reported in the post-operative aftermath of breast surgery. We present a case of necrotizing fasciitis of the breast following submammary mastectomy with immediate reconstruction using a pre-pectoral silicone implant, which resulted in multiple organ failure and the death of the patient despite optimal medical and surgical management. This is the first case to occur after immediate breast reconstruction.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants , Fasciitis, Necrotizing , Humans , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/etiology , Fasciitis, Necrotizing/surgery , Female , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Fatal Outcome , Middle Aged , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery
12.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 96: 107-110, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39084021

ABSTRACT

Infection after implant-based breast reconstruction remains challenging, with infection rates up to 24%. Best clinical practice indicates prophylactic oral antibiotics are ineffective at preventing infection. Absorbable antibiotic beads have been routinely used in other surgical subspecialties such as orthopedic and vascular procedures for continuous local antibiotic delivery to the surgical site when implants are placed. Biodegradable calcium sulfate antibiotic beads have been shown to normalize incidence of infection when used prophylactically for a high-risk prepectoral patient population. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of prophylactic biodegradable antibiotic beads when used non-selectively for all prepectoral immediate tissue expander (TE) reconstruction. Patients who underwent mastectomy and immediate prepectoral TE reconstruction on the same day between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who received antibiotic beads (Group 1) and those who did not (Group 2). Absorbable calcium-sulfate beads were reconstituted with 1 g vancomycin and 240 mg gentamicin. There were 33 patients (63 TEs) in Group 1 and 330 patients (545 TEs) in Group 2. TE loss was present in 1.5% (1/65 TEs) Group 1 compared to 9.4% (51/545 TEs) in Group 2 (p = 0.032). The mean follow-up time was 178 days (range 93-266 days). Prophylactic biodegradable antibiotic beads used during immediate tissue expander reconstruction decreased implant loss rate. There was one occurrence of SSI in the antibiotic bead group. Antibiotic beads may potentially decrease complications in immediate TE reconstruction when used non-selectively for all patients.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Anti-Bacterial Agents , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Gentamicins , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Gentamicins/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Mastectomy , Calcium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Vancomycin/administration & dosage , Adult , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Tissue Expansion Devices , Tissue Expansion/methods , Tissue Expansion/instrumentation , Prosthesis-Related Infections/prevention & control , Prosthesis-Related Infections/etiology , Mammaplasty/methods
13.
Medicina (Kaunas) ; 60(7)2024 Jun 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39064475

ABSTRACT

Background and Objectives: Mammary gland surgery has become very common, but there are complications of these operations, including the concept of breast implant illness (BII) in women with silicone gel breast implants (SBI), who suffer from various symptoms such as myalgia, arthralgia, fatigue, fever, dry eyes, or dry mouth. Silicone biomaterials are synthetic polymers that have their own physical and chemical properties and can exert their effect at the site of use and possibly on the general status of the body, causing inflammation and oxidative stress signs. The aim of the study was to examine components of the blood antioxidant system (AOS) of the mastopexy and breast augmentation patients before the operation, on the first post-op day, and 6 months after surgery. Materials and Methods: Healthy breast surgery patients (women aged 31 to 60 years without visible pathologies) were selected for the study and formed 2 groups: breast lift-mastopexy without silicone biomaterials (I group, 30 patients) and breast augmentation using silicone biomaterials (II group, 28 patients). All patients underwent standard preoperative tests. Glutathione peroxidase (GPxSe) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) in blood, selenium (Se), selenium protein P (SelPP), and total antioxidant status (TAS) in plasma were measured as AOS parameters. The concentration of vitamin D was also determined. A total of 174 blood tests were performed. Results: Overall, there were no differences in both groups in measured antioxidant system indicators over time; neither changes in objective nor subjective status were observed. However, baseline activity of GPxSe was relatively high but restored to normal values 6 months after surgery. In the mastopexy group, GPxSe decreased from 12,961.7 U/L by 18.9% to 10,513.4 U/L, and in the breast augmentation group, from 15,505.0 U/L by 25.1% to 11,265.5 U/L, which is a decrease of 18.9% and 25.1%, respectively. The patients did not note any complaints; other indicators of standard biochemical tests were within normal limits. Conclusions: The two types of surgical interventions, breast mastopexy and augmentation of the mammary glands, do not significantly impact blood AOS and are physiological in nature.


Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Mammaplasty , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Antioxidants/analysis , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Oxidative Stress/physiology , Glutathione Peroxidase/blood , Selenium/blood , Selenium/analysis
14.
Molecules ; 29(14)2024 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39064826

ABSTRACT

In the past, polyacrylamide hydrogel was a popular choice for breast augmentation filler, and many women underwent mammoplasty with this gel. However, due to frequent complications, the use of polyacrylamide hydrogel in mammoplasty has been banned. Despite this ban, patients experiencing complications still seek medical treatment. The aim of this study was to investigate the fate of the polymer over a defined implantation period. Biopsies of breast implants were obtained from patients with 23 and 27 years of post-mammoplasty. These biopsies were meticulously purified from biological impurities and subjected to analysis using IR spectrometry, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, gas chromatography, and differential scanning calorimetry. The findings revealed the presence of polyacrylamide hydrogel residues, along with degradation products, within the infected material. Notably, the low-molecular-weight degradation products revealed via gas chromatography are aggressive and toxic substances capable of inducing chronic inflammation. This study sheds light on the long-term consequences of polyacrylamide hydrogel implantation, highlighting the persistence of harmful degradation products and their role in exacerbating patient complications.


Subject(s)
Acrylic Resins , Inflammation , Humans , Acrylic Resins/chemistry , Female , Mammary Glands, Human/metabolism , Mammary Glands, Human/pathology , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Mammaplasty , Middle Aged
15.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 95: 368-376, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38986311

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Considerable research has been carried out on the postoperative benefits of extended antibiotic prophylaxis (EAP) in different surgical contexts, generating various results regarding its effectiveness. Some studies indicate positive outcomes, whereas others indicate no significant advantages. Our approach involves conducting a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to provide a more nuanced understanding of the role of extended antibiotic use because of the lack of a consistent consensus. METHODS: A thorough search of the Cochrane Library, Embase, and MEDLINE electronic databases was conducted to identify relevant studies. The metafor package in R software was used for meta-analysis. We collected risk ratios (RRs) for surgical site infection (SSI) in the EAP versus non-EAP groups from the included studies to assess the effects of EAP on reducing the risk of SSI. The meta-analysis used a random-effects model, and effect sizes were presented with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Fourteen studies, involving 12,572 patients who underwent implant-based reconstruction postmastectomy, were included. Pooling the results of the studies that used EAP until drain removal revealed no protective effect of EAP against SSI risk (RR = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.60-1.18). Similarly, our analysis revealed no significant benefit of EAP in studies where EAP was not contingent on drain removal (RR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.46-1.07). CONCLUSIONS: EAP administration did not decrease the incidence of SSI in individuals undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction surgery postmastectomy.


Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Breast Implantation , Surgical Wound Infection , Humans , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Female , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/adverse effects , Mastectomy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery
16.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 95: 402-410, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39047335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), it is unclear whether there is any difference in the complication rates between prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement without acellular dermal matrix (ADM). AIM: To compare the rates of early post-operative complications and time to initiation of adjuvant treatment in patients undergoing IBR between prepectoral and subpectoral implant placement without ADM for the two surgical procedure. METHODS: We retrospectively retrieved data of patients who underwent IBR with prepectoral versus subpectoral implant placement between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2022 in a large cancer center in France. RESULTS: We included 192 patients: 119 in the prepectoral and 73 in the subpectoral group. Their clinical characteristics were similar. Thirty patients (15.6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, among them 27 (14.1%) received it within 12 weeks, and there was no difference between the groups (p = 0.12). In the prepectoral group, 39 patients (32.8%) received adjuvant radiotherapy versus 5 (6.8%) in the subpectoral group (p < 0.001), but there was no significant difference in time to treatment commencement. Overall, 35 patients (29.4%) in the prepectoral group and 17 (23.3%) in the subpectoral group experienced post-operative complications (p = 0.44). Using multivariable analysis, the only factor associated with post-operative complications was determined to be mastectomy weight (odds ratio 1.98 (1.10-3.59) for weight ≥500 g; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Prepectoral implant placement without ADM can be proposed to patients undergoing IBR with an indication for adjuvant treatment. However, in our study, the reoperation rate with this technique was slightly higher (p = 0.008). This is partly due to the learning curve for surgeons using this new technique.


Subject(s)
Acellular Dermis , Breast Implantation , Breast Neoplasms , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Implantation/methods , Breast Implantation/adverse effects , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Pectoralis Muscles/surgery , Breast Implants/adverse effects , Adult , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Mammaplasty/methods , Mammaplasty/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL