Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 69
Filter
1.
Rev Argent Microbiol ; 56(3): 270-275, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38453565

ABSTRACT

The present study evaluates the effects of vaccination with Brucella melitensis strains Rev 1 ΔeryCD and Rev 1 on the reproductive system of male goats. Three groups, each of them consisting of 15 six-month-old brucellosis-free male goats, were studied. The first group was vaccinated with the Rev 1 ΔeryCD strain, the second group received Rev 1 and the third group was inoculated with sterile physiological saline solution. The dose of both strains was of 1×109CFU/ml. Over the course of the five months of this study, three males from each group were euthanized every month. Their reproductive tracts, spleens, and lymph nodes were collected to analyze serology, bacteriology PCR, histology, and immunohistochemistry. Results show that vaccination with B. melitensis strains Rev 1 ΔeryCD and Rev 1 does not harm the reproductive system of male goats. Strain B. melitensis Rev 1 ΔeryCD displayed a lower capacity to colonize the reproductive tract than strain Rev 1, which was attributed to its limited catabolic action toward erythritol.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine , Brucella melitensis , Brucellosis , Goats , Animals , Male , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Brucellosis/veterinary , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Vaccination , Genitalia, Male/microbiology , Bacterial Vaccines
2.
Front Immunol ; 12: 778475, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992597

ABSTRACT

Brucella spp. are Gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacteria that cause brucellosis in humans and animals. Currently available live attenuated vaccines against brucellosis still have drawbacks. Therefore, subunit vaccines, produced using epitope-based antigens, have the advantage of being safe, cost-effective and efficacious. Here, we identified B. abortus small RNAs expressed during early infection with bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and an apolipoprotein N-acyltransferase (Int) was identified as the putative target of the greatest expressed small RNA. Decreased expression of Int was observed during BMDM infection and the protein sequence was evaluated to rationally select a putative immunogenic epitope by immunoinformatic, which was explored as a vaccinal candidate. C57BL/6 mice were immunized and challenged with B. abortus, showing lower recovery in the number of viable bacteria in the liver, spleen, and axillary lymph node and greater production of IgG and fractions when compared to non-vaccinated mice. The vaccinated and infected mice showed the increased expression of TNF-α, IFN-γ, and IL-6 following expression of the anti-inflammatory genes IL-10 and TGF-ß in the liver, justifying the reduction in the number and size of the observed granulomas. BMDMs stimulated with splenocyte supernatants from vaccinated and infected mice increase the CD86+ marker, as well as expressing greater amounts of iNOS and the consequent increase in NO production, suggesting an increase in the phagocytic and microbicidal capacity of these cells to eliminate the bacteria.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Zoonoses/prevention & control , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Acyltransferases/genetics , Animals , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Zoonoses/immunology , Bacterial Zoonoses/microbiology , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/genetics , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Computer Simulation , Disease Models, Animal , Epitope Mapping/methods , Humans , Immunogenicity, Vaccine , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/microbiology , Mice , Primary Cell Culture , RNA, Bacterial/genetics , RNA, Bacterial/isolation & purification , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology
3.
Microbiol Immunol ; 64(11): 730-736, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32965738

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is a major zoonotic disease, and Brucella melitensis is the species most often associated with human infection. Vaccination is the most efficient tool for controlling animal brucellosis, with a consequent decrease of incidence of human infections. Commercially available live attenuated vaccines provide some degree of protection, but retain residual pathogenicity to human and animals. In this study, Brucella ovis ∆abcBA (Bo∆abcBA), a live attenuated candidate vaccine strain, was tested in two formulations (encapsulated with alginate and alginate plus vitelline protein B [VpB]) to immunize mice against experimental challenge with B. melitensis strain 16M. One week after infection, livers and spleens of immunized mice had reduced numbers of the challenge strain B. melitensis 16M when compared with those of nonimmunized mice, with a reduction of approximately 1-log10 of B. melitensis 16M count in the spleens from immunized mice. Moreover, splenocytes stimulated with B. melitensis antigens in vitro secreted IFN-γ when mice had been immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate plus VpB, but not with alginate alone. Body and liver weights were similar among groups, although spleens from mice immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate were larger than those immunized with Bo∆abcBA encapsulated with alginate plus VpB or nonimmunized mice. This study demonstrated that two vaccine formulations containing Bo∆abcBA protected mice against experimental challenge with B. melitensis.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella melitensis/immunology , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Animals , Cytokines , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Immunization , Liver/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Spleen/immunology , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
4.
PLoS One ; 15(4): e0231893, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32298378

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Vaccination is the most important tool for controlling brucellosis, but currently there is no vaccine available for canine brucellosis, which is a zoonotic disease of worldwide distribution caused by Brucella canis. This study aimed to evaluate protection and immune response induced by Brucella ovis ΔabcBA (BoΔabcBA) encapsulated with alginate against the challenge with Brucella canis in mice and to assess the safety of this strain for dogs. METHODS: Intracellular growth of the vaccine strain BoΔabcBA was assessed in canine and ovine macrophages. Protection induced by BoΔabcBA against virulent Brucella canis was evaluated in the mouse model. Safety of the vaccine strain BoΔabcBA was assessed in experimentally inoculated dogs. RESULTS: Wild type B. ovis and B. canis had similar internalization and intracellular multiplication profiles in both canine and ovine macrophages. The BoΔabcBA strain had an attenuated phenotype in both canine and ovine macrophages. Immunization of BALB/c mice with alginate-encapsulated BoΔabcBA (108 CFU) induced lymphocyte proliferation, production of IL-10 and IFN-γ, and protected against experimental challenge with B. canis. Dogs immunized with alginate-encapsulated BoΔabcBA (109 CFU) seroconverted, and had no hematologic, biochemical or clinical changes. Furthermore, BoΔabcBA was not detected by isolation or PCR performed using blood, semen, urine samples or vaginal swabs at any time point over the course of this study. BoΔabcBA was isolated from lymph nodes near to the site of inoculation in two dogs at 22 weeks post immunization. CONCLUSION: Encapsulated BoΔabcBA protected mice against experimental B. canis infection, and it is safe for dogs. Therefore, B. ovis ΔabcBA has potential as a vaccine candidate for canine brucellosis prevention.


Subject(s)
ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters/genetics , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella ovis/genetics , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Dog Diseases/prevention & control , Alginates/chemistry , Animals , Antibody Formation , Brucella canis/pathogenicity , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucella ovis/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucellosis/pathology , Dog Diseases/microbiology , Dog Diseases/pathology , Dogs , Female , Immunization , Liver/microbiology , Liver/physiology , Lymphocytes/cytology , Lymphocytes/immunology , Lymphocytes/metabolism , Macrophages/cytology , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/metabolism , Male , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mutation , Sheep
5.
Vaccine ; 36(21): 2928-2936, 2018 05 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29685597

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus is the etiological agent of brucellosis, a zoonotic disease affecting cattle and humans. This disease has been partially controlled in cattle by immunization with live attenuated B. abortus S19 and RB51 strains. However, use of these vaccine strains has been associated with safety issues in animals and humans. New vaccines have since emerged in the prevention of brucellosis, particularly DNA vaccines, which have shown effectiveness and a good safety profile. Their protection efficacy in mice is associated with the induction of Th1 type and cytotoxic T cell mediated immune response against structural antigens and virulence factors expressed during B. abortus infection. Some antigenic candidate for vaccine design against brucellosis (mainly DNA vaccines) have been obtained from genomic island 3 (GI-3) of B. abortus, which encodes several open reading frames (ORFs) involved in the intracellular survival and virulence of this pathogen. The immunogenicity and protection conferred by these DNA vaccines in a murine model is reviewed in this article, suggesting that some of them could be safe and effective vaccine candidates against to prevent B. abortus infection.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Animals , Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/isolation & purification , Brucella abortus/genetics , Cattle , Disease Models, Animal , Genomic Islands , Humans , Mice , Open Reading Frames , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/isolation & purification , Vaccines, Subunit/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology , Vaccines, Subunit/isolation & purification
6.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 50(2): 433-439, 2018 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29082458

ABSTRACT

Semen contaminated with microorganisms can disseminate serious diseases including brucellosis. The objectives of this study were to detect Brucella-specific antibodies and Brucella abortus DNA in samples of blood and fresh semen from 100 animals older than 20 months. The samples were collected on farms and in semen collection and processing centers (CCPS). The serum samples were evaluated by Rose Bengal test (RBT). B. abortus DNA was detected by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using BAB and IS771 primers. The difference between the vaccine field strain was identified using ery-1, ery-2, and ery-3 primers, using the hemi-nested PCR method. No anti-B. abortus antibodies were detected in the serum samples. Out of the total semen samples, 68% (68/100) presented amplifications of the B. abortus genes. All (68/68) were identified as B19 strain of Brucella abortus vaccine. It was concluded that even bulls that are seronegative for brucellosis can eliminate the bacteria in the semen. The presence in the DNA of the B19 vaccine strain should be investigated for a better understanding of the epidemiological importance of this strain in these animals.


Subject(s)
Brucella abortus/isolation & purification , Brucellosis/veterinary , Semen/microbiology , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brazil , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Cattle , DNA Primers , Male , Polymerase Chain Reaction/veterinary
7.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 49(8): 1779-1781, 2017 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28812192

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is an infectious and contagious disease that profoundly impacts public health. However, in many countries, disease prevention is restricted to the vaccination of calves, and there is no prophylactic strategy for pregnant heifers and cows. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of the rough strain vaccine against brucellosis in pregnant cattle. Crossbred cows (N = 96) at three gestational periods (early, mid, or late pregnancy) were randomly allocated into the vaccine treatment group or to the control group. We then compared the percentage of pregnancies reaching full term, live calves 60 days after delivery, and seropositive calves. There was no effect of vaccination in any of the gestational periods on the evaluation endpoints. In conclusion, vaccination against brucellosis with the rough strain is safe for pregnant cattle at all gestational periods.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Vaccination/veterinary , Animals , Brucella Vaccine/adverse effects , Cattle , Female , Parturition , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/veterinary , Vaccination/adverse effects
8.
PLoS One ; 11(11): e0166582, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27846274

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: In spite of all the research effort for developing new vaccines against brucellosis, it remains unclear whether these new vaccine technologies will in fact become widely used. The goal of this study was to perform a meta-analysis to identify parameters that influence vaccine efficacy as well as a descriptive analysis on how the field of Brucella vaccinology is advancing concerning type of vaccine, improvement of protection on animal models over time, and factors that may affect protection in the mouse model. METHODS: A total of 117 publications that met the criteria were selected for inclusion in this study, with a total of 782 individual experiments analyzed. RESULTS: Attenuated (n = 221), inactivated (n = 66) and mutant (n = 102) vaccines provided median protection index above 2, whereas subunit (n = 287), DNA (n = 68), and vectored (n = 38) vaccines provided protection indexes lower than 2. When all categories of experimental vaccines are analyzed together, the trend line clearly demonstrates that there was no improvement of the protection indexes over the past 30 years, with a low negative and non significant linear coefficient. A meta-regression model was developed including all vaccine categories (attenuated, DNA, inactivated, mutant, subunit, and vectored) considering the protection index as a dependent variable and the other parameters (mouse strain, route of vaccination, number of vaccinations, use of adjuvant, challenge Brucella species) as independent variables. Some of these variables influenced the expected protection index of experimental vaccines against Brucella spp. in the mouse model. CONCLUSION: In spite of the large number of publication over the past 30 years, our results indicate that there is not clear trend to improve the protective potential of these experimental vaccines.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/therapeutic use , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Vaccines, Attenuated/therapeutic use , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Animals , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucella abortus/pathogenicity , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Mice , Vaccination , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
9.
PLoS One ; 10(9): e0136696, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26352261

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus S19 and RB51 strains have been successfully used to control bovine brucellosis worldwide; however, currently, most of our understanding of the protective immune response induced by vaccination comes from studies in mice. The aim of this study was to characterize and compare the immune responses induced in cattle prime-immunized with B. abortus S19 or RB51 and revaccinated with RB51. Female calves, aged 4 to 8 months, were vaccinated with either vaccine S19 (0.6-1.2 x 1011 CFU) or RB51 (1.3 x 1010 CFU) on day 0, and revaccinated with RB51 (1.3 x 1010 CFU) on day 365 of the experiment. Characterization of the immune response was performed using serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Blood samples were collected on days 0, 28, 210, 365, 393 and 575 post-immunization. Results showed that S19 and RB51 vaccination induced an immune response characterized by proliferation of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells; IFN-É£ and IL-17A production by CD4+ T-cells; cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells; IL-6 secretion; CD4+ and CD8+ memory cells; antibodies of IgG1 class; and expression of the phenotypes of activation in T-cells. However, the immune response stimulated by S19 compared to RB51 showed higher persistency of IFN-É£ and CD4+ memory cells, induction of CD21+ memory cells and higher secretion of IL-6. After RB51 revaccination, the immune response was chiefly characterized by increase in IFN-É£ expression, proliferation of antigen-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells and decrease of IL-6 production in both groups. Nevertheless, a different polarization of the immune response, CD4+- or CD8+-dominant, was observed after the booster with RB51 for S19 and RB51 prime-vaccinated animals, respectively. Our results indicate that after prime vaccination both vaccine strains induce a strong and complex Th1 immune response, although after RB51 revaccination the differences between immune profiles induced by prime-vaccination become accentuated.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Vaccination , Animals , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cattle , Cell Proliferation/physiology , Immunization, Secondary
10.
Vet Res ; 46: 76, 2015 Jul 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26155935

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus vaccines play a central role in bovine brucellosis control/eradication programs and have been successfully used worldwide for decades. Strain 19 and RB51 are the approved B. abortus vaccines strains most commonly used to protect cattle against infection and abortion. However, due to some drawbacks shown by these vaccines much effort has been undertaken for the development of new vaccines, safer and more effective, that could also be used in other susceptible species of animals. In this paper, we present a review of the main aspects of the vaccines that have been used in the brucellosis control over the years and the current research advances in the development of new B. abortus vaccines.


Subject(s)
Abortion, Veterinary/prevention & control , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Animals , Cattle , Female , Pregnancy
11.
Vaccine ; 33(31): 3659-66, 2015 Jul 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26048781

ABSTRACT

Brucella abortus live vaccines have been used successfully to control bovine brucellosis worldwide for decades. However, due to some limitations of these live vaccines, efforts are being made for the development of new safer and more effective vaccines that could also be used in other susceptible species. In this context, understanding the protective immune responses triggered by B. abortus is critical for the development of new vaccines. Such understandings will enhance our knowledge of the host/pathogen interactions and enable to develop methods to evaluate potential vaccines and innovative treatments for animals or humans. At present, almost all the knowledge regarding B. abortus specific immunological responses comes from studies in mice. Active participation of macrophages, dendritic cells, IFN-γ producing CD4(+) T-cells and cytotoxic CD8(+) T-cells are vital to overcome the infection. In this review, we discuss the characteristics of the immune responses triggered by vaccination versus infection by B. abortus, in different hosts.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , Immunity, Cellular , Immunity, Humoral , Animals , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Cattle , Mice
12.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 22(7): 789-97, 2015 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25947146

ABSTRACT

This study aimed to evaluate the Brucella ovis ΔabcBA strain as a vaccine candidate in the murine model. BALB/c mice were subcutaneously or intraperitoneally immunized with a single dose or three doses of the B. ovis ΔabcBA strain and then were challenged with wild-type B. ovis. Single or multiple immunizations provided only mild protection, with significantly smaller numbers of wild-type B. ovis CFU in the livers of immunized mice but not in the spleens. Encapsulation of B. ovis ΔabcBA significantly improved protection against experimental challenges in both BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice. Furthermore, immunization with encapsulated B. ovis ΔabcBA markedly prevented lesions in the spleens and livers of experimentally challenged mice. These results demonstrated that the encapsulated B. ovis ΔabcBA strain confers protection to mice; therefore, this strain has potential as a vaccine candidate for rams.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella ovis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Vaccination/methods , Animals , Bacterial Load , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/genetics , Brucella ovis/genetics , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/microbiology , Brucellosis/pathology , Cells, Immobilized/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Drug Carriers/administration & dosage , Gene Deletion , Injections, Intraperitoneal , Injections, Subcutaneous , Liver/microbiology , Liver/pathology , Male , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Spleen/microbiology , Spleen/pathology , Vaccines, Attenuated/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/genetics , Vaccines, Attenuated/immunology
13.
Infect Immun ; 83(4): 1458-64, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25644010

ABSTRACT

Brucella species can cause brucellosis, a zoonotic disease that causes serious livestock economic losses and represents a public health threat. The mechanism of virulence of Brucella spp. is not yet fully understood. Therefore, it is crucial to identify new molecules that serve as virulence factors to better understand this host-pathogen interplay. Here, we evaluated the role of the Brucella membrane fusogenic protein (Mfp) and outer membrane protein 19 (Omp19) in bacterial pathogenesis. In this study, we showed that B. abortus Δmfp::kan and Δomp19::kan deletion mutant strains have reduced persistence in vivo in C57BL/6 and interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1) knockout (KO) mice. Additionally, 24 h after macrophage infection with a Δmfp::kan or Δomp19::kan strain expressing green fluorescent protein (GFP) approximately 80% or 65% of Brucella-containing vacuoles (BCVs) retained the late endosomal/lysosomal marker LAMP-1, respectively, whereas around 60% of BCVs containing wild-type S2308 were found in LAMP-1-negative compartments. B. abortus Δomp19::kan was attenuated in vivo but had a residual virulence in C57BL/6 and IRF-1 KO mice, whereas the Δmfp::kan strain had a lower virulence in these same mouse models. Furthermore, Δmfp::kan and Δomp19::kan strains were used as live vaccines. Challenge experiments revealed that in C57BL/6 and IRF-1 KO mice, the Δmfp::kan strain induced greater protection than the vaccine RB51 and protection similar that of vaccine S19. However, a Δomp19::kan strain induced protection similar to that of RB51. Thus, these results demonstrate that Brucella Mfp and Omp19 are critical for full bacterial virulence and that the Δmfp::kan mutant may serve as a potential vaccine candidate in future studies.


Subject(s)
Antigens, Bacterial/genetics , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/genetics , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucella abortus/pathogenicity , Brucellosis/immunology , Lipoproteins/genetics , Membrane Fusion Proteins/genetics , Virulence Factors/genetics , Animals , Antigens, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucellosis/pathology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Gene Deletion , Green Fluorescent Proteins/biosynthesis , Interferon Regulatory Factor-1/genetics , Lipoproteins/immunology , Lysosomal Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/microbiology , Membrane Fusion Proteins/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Mice, Knockout , Vaccination , Virulence Factors/immunology
14.
Vaccine ; 33(4): 507-11, 2015 Jan 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25498211

ABSTRACT

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of different mouse strains (BALB/c, Swiss and CD-1) and different challenge strains (Brucella abortus 544 and 2308) in the study of B. abortus vaccine (S19 and RB51) immunogenicity test in the murine model. No significant difference in B. abortus vaccine potency assay was found with the use of B. abortus 544 or B. abortus 2308 as challenge strain. Results of variance analysis showed an interaction between treatment and mouse strain; therefore these parameters could not be compared separately. When CD-1 groups were compared, those vaccinated showed significantly lower counts than non-vaccinated ones (P<0.05), independently of the vaccine received (S19 or RB51). Similar results were observed on BALB/c groups. However, in Swiss mouse groups, S19 was more protective than RB51 (P<0.05), which showed protection when compared to the non-vaccinated group (P<0.05). In summary, data from the present study showed that CD-1, BALB/c and Swiss mice strains, as well as both challenge strains, B. abortus strains 544 and 2308, can be used in immunogenicity tests of S19 and RB51 vaccines.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Vaccine Potency , Animals , Bacterial Load , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Mice , Spleen/microbiology
15.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 22(3): 274-81, 2015 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25540276

ABSTRACT

VirB proteins from Brucella spp. constitute the type IV secretion system, a key virulence factor mediating the intracellular survival of these bacteria. Here, we assessed whether a Th1-type immune response against VirB proteins may protect mice from Brucella infection and whether this response can be induced in the dog, a natural host for Brucella. Splenocytes from mice immunized with VirB7 or VirB9 responded to their respective antigens with significant and specific production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ), whereas interleukin-4 (IL-4) was not detected. Thirty days after an intraperitoneal challenge with live Brucella abortus, the spleen load of bacteria was almost 1 log lower in mice immunized with VirB proteins than in unvaccinated animals. As colonization reduction seemed to correlate with a Th1-type immune response against VirB proteins, we decided to assess whether such a response could be elicited in the dog. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from dogs immunized with VirB proteins (three subcutaneous doses in QuilA adjuvant) produced significantly higher levels of IFN-γ than cells from control animals upon in vitro stimulation with VirB proteins. A skin test to assess specific delayed-type hypersensitivity was positive in 4 out of 5 dogs immunized with either VirB7 or VirB9. As both proteins are predicted to locate in the outer membrane of Brucella organisms, the ability of anti-VirB antibodies to mediate complement-dependent bacteriolysis of B. canis was assessed in vitro. Sera from dogs immunized with either VirB7 or VirB9, but not from those receiving phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), produced significant bacteriolysis. These results suggest that VirB-specific responses that reduce organ colonization by Brucella in mice can be also elicited in dogs.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Bacterial Secretion Systems , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella/growth & development , Brucella/immunology , Spleen/microbiology , Th1 Cells/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/immunology , Bacterial Load , Bacterial Proteins/administration & dosage , Bacteriolysis , Brucella/pathogenicity , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella abortus/immunology , Brucella canis/immunology , Dogs , Hypersensitivity, Delayed , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interferon-gamma/immunology , Interleukin-4/immunology , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/immunology , Spleen/cytology , Spleen/immunology , Vaccination
16.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 21(12): 1689-94, 2014 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25339409

ABSTRACT

Canine brucellosis is an infectious disease caused by the Gram-negative bacterium Brucella canis. Unlike conventional control programs for other species of the genus Brucella, currently there is no vaccine available against canine brucellosis, and preventive measures are simply diagnosis and isolation of infected dogs. New approaches are therefore needed to develop an effective and safe immunization strategy against this zoonotic pathogen. In this study, BALB/c mice were subcutaneously immunized with the following: (i) the recombinant Brucella Omp31 antigen formulated in different adjuvants (incomplete Freund adjuvant, aluminum hydroxide, Quil A, and Montanide IMS 3012 VGPR), (ii) plasmid pCIOmp31, or (iii) pCIOmp31 plasmid followed by boosting with recombinant Omp31 (rOmp31). The immune response and the protective efficacy against B. canis infection were characterized. The different strategies induced a strong immunoglobulin G (IgG) response. Furthermore, spleen cells from rOmp31-immunized mice produced gamma interferon and interleukin-4 (IL-4) after in vitro stimulation with rOmp31, indicating the induction of a mixed Th1-Th2 response. Recombinant Omp31 administered with different adjuvants as well as the prime-boost strategy conferred protection against B. canis. In conclusion, our results suggest that Omp31 could be a useful candidate for the development of a subcellular vaccine against B. canis infection.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella canis/immunology , Brucellosis/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Cytotoxic/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Animals , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Dogs , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Vaccination
17.
Vaccine ; 32(46): 6034-8, 2014 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25218192

ABSTRACT

The aims of this study were to address the protective immune response induced by S19 vaccination (n=10) and RB51 revaccination, in pregnant (n=9) and non-pregnant (n=10) S19 calfhood-vaccinated cattle as follows: evaluate the in vitro CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes specific proliferation, and in vitro expression of IFN-γ by CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cells and IL-4 by CD4(+), CD8(+) and CD21(+) lymphocytes subset. Upon in vitro stimulation with γ-irradiated Brucella abortus 2308, blood mononuclear cells from S19 vaccinated and RB51 revaccinated cows exhibited significantly higher proliferation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes and CD4(+)IFN-γ(+) T-cells compared to non-vaccinated animals. RB51 revaccination, regardless of the pregnancy status, did not enhance the proliferation of CD4(+) or CD8(+) T-cells nor IFN-γ or IL-4 production. Data from the present study suggest that cattle's cellular immune response induced after brucellosis vaccination and revaccination is due to CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-lymphocytes, being CD4(+) T-cells the main source of IFN-γ.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucellosis, Bovine/prevention & control , CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Cytokines/immunology , Animals , Brucella abortus , Cattle , Female , Immunization, Secondary , Interferon-gamma/immunology , Interleukin-4/immunology , Pregnancy , Vaccination/veterinary
18.
Clin Vaccine Immunol ; 21(11): 1474-80, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25165025

ABSTRACT

This study was conducted to evaluate the immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a DNA vaccine encoding Brucella abortus Cu,Zn superoxide dismutase (SOD) using the Toll-like receptor 2/6 agonist S-[2,3-bispalmitoyiloxy-(2R)-propyl]-R-cysteinyl-amido-monomethoxy polyethylene glycol (BPPcysMPEG) as an adjuvant. Intranasal coadministration of BPPcysMPEG with a plasmid carrying the SOD-encoding gene (pcDNA-SOD) into BALB/c mice elicited antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses. Humoral responses were characterized by the stimulation of IgG2a and IgG1 and by the presence of SOD-specific secretory IgA in nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids. Furthermore, T-cell proliferative responses and increased production of gamma interferon were also observed upon splenocyte restimulation with recombinant SOD. Cytotoxic responses were also stimulated, as demonstrated by the lysis of RB51-SOD-infected J774.A1 macrophages by cells recovered from immunized mice. The pcDNA-SOD/BPPcysMPEG formulation induced improved protection against challenge with the virulent strain B. abortus 2308 in BALB/c mice over that provided by pcDNA-SOD, suggesting the potential of this vaccination strategy against Brucella infection.


Subject(s)
Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella abortus/enzymology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Polyethylene Glycols/administration & dosage , Superoxide Dismutase/immunology , Vaccines, DNA/immunology , Adjuvants, Immunologic/pharmacology , Administration, Intranasal , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Proteins/immunology , Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid/immunology , Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/genetics , Brucella abortus/genetics , Brucellosis/immunology , Cell Proliferation , Cytotoxicity Tests, Immunologic , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Immunoglobulin A, Secretory/analysis , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Macrophages/immunology , Macrophages/microbiology , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Nasal Mucosa/immunology , Polyethylene Glycols/pharmacology , Spleen/immunology , Superoxide Dismutase/genetics , T-Lymphocytes/immunology , Toll-Like Receptor 2/agonists , Toll-Like Receptor 6/agonists , Vaccines, DNA/administration & dosage , Vaccines, DNA/genetics
19.
Vaccine ; 31(51): 6129-35, 2013 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23906889

ABSTRACT

Canine brucellosis represents a major reproductive problem worldwide and it is considered a zoonotic disease. New approaches are therefore urgently needed to develop an effective and safe immunization strategy against Brucella canis. In the present study, BALB/c mice were subcutaneously immunized with the recombinant chimera rBLSOmp31 formulated in different adjuvants. The different strategies induced a vigorous immunoglobulin G (IgG) response, with high titers of IgG1 as well as IgG2. Besides, spleen cells from rBLSOmp31-immunized mice produced gamma interferon and IL-4, suggesting the induction of a mixed Th1-Th2. Vaccination with rBLSOmp31-IFA formulation provided the best protection levels comparable with that given by control vaccines. None of the immunization strategies induced serological interference in diagnosis. Hitherto, this is the first report that a recombinant vaccine confers protection against B. canis in mice.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucella canis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Animals , Antibodies, Bacterial/blood , Brucellosis/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Female , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Injections, Subcutaneous , Interferon-gamma/metabolism , Interleukin-4/metabolism , Leukocytes, Mononuclear/immunology , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Spleen/immunology
20.
Biomed Res Int ; 2013: 743509, 2013.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23862154

ABSTRACT

Brucellosis is a worldwide zoonosis affecting animal and human health. In the last several decades, much research has been performed to develop safer Brucella vaccines to control the disease mainly in animals. Till now, no effective human vaccine is available. The aim of this paper is to review and discuss the importance of methodologies used to develop Brucella vaccines in pursuing this challenge.


Subject(s)
Brucella Vaccine/history , Animals , Brucella Vaccine/immunology , Brucellosis/immunology , Brucellosis/prevention & control , Disease Eradication , History, 20th Century , Humans , Vaccines, Subunit/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL