The Prevalence and Prognosis of Cachexia in Patients with Non-Sarcopenic Dysphagia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and prognosis of cachexia in patients with non-sarcopenic dysphagia. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Japanese sarcopenic dysphagia database. Cachexia was diagnosed using the Asian Working Group for Cachexia criteria, sarcopenia using the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia 2019 criteria, and malnutrition using the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition criteria. Outcomes were death, swallowing function (Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS)), and activities of daily living (Barthel Index (BI)). The mean age of the 175 non-sarcopenic dysphagia patients was 77 (±11) years; 103 (59%) were male, 30 (17%) had cachexia, 133 (76%) had whole-body sarcopenia, and 92 (53%) were malnourished. Of the 30 patients with cachexia, 4 and 11 did not have sarcopenia and malnutrition, respectively. No significant associations were found between cachexia, sarcopenia, and malnutrition. Death was notably higher in the cachexia group (5/30; 17% vs. 2/145; 1%, p = 0.002). Median FILS (7 vs. 8, p = 0.585) and median BI (35 vs. 50, p = 0.469) scores did not show significant differences based on cachexia status. The prevalence of cachexia was 17%, and mortality may be higher with cachexia in non-sarcopenic dysphagia patients.

The mortality burden of cachexia or weight loss in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer: A systematic literature review.

Cancer-associated cachexia is a multifactorial wasting disorder characterized by anorexia, unintentional weight loss (skeletal muscle mass with or without loss of fat mass), progressive functional impairment, and poor prognosis. This systematic literature review (SLR) examined the relationship between cachexia and survival in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer in recent literature. The SLR was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Embase® and PubMed were searched to identify articles published in English between 1 January 2016 and 10 October 2021 reporting survival in adults with cancer and cachexia or at risk of cachexia, defined by international consensus (IC) diagnostic criteria or a broader definition of any weight loss. Included publications were studies in ≥100 patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer. Thirteen publications in patients with colorectal cancer and 13 with pancreatic cancer met eligibility criteria. Included studies were observational and primarily from Europe and the United States. Eleven studies (42%) reported cachexia using IC criteria and 15 (58%) reported any weight loss. An association between survival and cachexia or weight loss was assessed across studies using multivariate (n = 23) or univariate (n = 3) analyses and within each study across multiple weight loss categories. Cachexia/weight loss was associated with a statistically significantly poorer survival in at least one weight loss category in 16 of 23 studies that used multivariate analyses and in 1 of 3 studies (33%) that used univariate analyses. Of the 17 studies demonstrating a significant association, 9 were in patients with colorectal cancer and 8 were in patients with pancreatic cancer. Cachexia or weight loss was associated with significantly poorer survival in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer in nearly two-thirds of the studies. The classification of weight loss varied across and within studies (multiple categories were evaluated) and may have contributed to variability. Nonetheless, awareness of cachexia and routine assessment of weight change in clinical practice in patients with colorectal or pancreatic cancer could help inform prognosis and influence early disease management strategies.

Malnutrition and cachexia are associated with poor CAR T-cell therapy outcomes including survival.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has emerged as a revolutionary treatment for patients with refractory or relapsed B-cell malignancies. However, a significant proportion of patients experience negative outcomes, including severe inflammatory toxicities and relapse. Cachexia and malnutrition are known secondary syndromes in many cancer patients, attributed to the effects of active malignancy, systemic inflammation, and cumulative treatment burden; however, further research is required to accurately characterise these issues in CAR T-cell patients. The aims of this service evaluation were to explore the changes in nutritional status (malnutrition and cachexia) in CAR T-cell therapy patients and the potential impact on patient outcomes including survival. Additionally, we describe the utilisation of dietetic resources in this specific patient population in a London tertiary referral centre. METHODS: Adult haematology patients receiving licensed CD19-targeting CAR T-cell therapy at University College London Hospital between 01/04/19 and 01/09/21 were included. Data were collected from the time of treatment consent, and throughout admission to day of discharge: body weight (BW), C-reactive protein, albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, nutrition-risk screening scores (hospital-specific) and dietetic input. Clinical outcomes such as 12-month all-cause mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, high-grade toxicities, and length of hospital stay (LoS) were also recorded. Cachexia and malnutrition were defined using the modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS) and Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) consensus, respectively. RESULTS: 114 patients (55.6 ± 15.1 years; 57% males) with B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (n = 109) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (n = 5), receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel (n = 89) and tisagenlecleucel (n = 25) were included. Median LoS for treatment was 34 (27-38) days. Prior to treatment, 31.5% of patients developed malnutrition, with pre-cachexia/refractory cachexia (mGPS) identified in 43.6% of patients. This altered nutritional status pre-treatment was significantly associated with adverse patient outcomes post-infusion; mGPS was independently associated with inferior overall survival (HR = 3.158, CI = 1.36-7.323, p = 0.007), with malnutrition and mGPS associated with increased LoS (p = 0.037), sepsis (p = 0.022) and ICU admission (p = 0.039). During admission, patients experienced significant BW loss (-5.6% (-8.8 to -2.4); p=<0.001), with 68.4% developing malnutrition. Malnutrition screening during admission identified 57% patients at-risk, with 66.6% of patients referred to dietetics; however, there was a lack of malnutrition screening and dietetic referrals prior to treatment. CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment malnutrition and cachexia was significantly associated with adverse CAR T patient outcomes, including mGPS cachexia status independently associated with inferior overall survival. Further research in this novel space is essential to confirm the extent and impact of nutritional issues, to assist with implementing dietetic pathways, and to identify potential interventions with a view to optimising outcomes.

Tumor metabolic activity is associated with subcutaneous adipose tissue radiodensity and survival in non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cachexia-associated body composition alterations and tumor metabolic activity are both associated with survival of cancer patients. Recently, subcutaneous adipose tissue properties have emerged as particularly prognostic body composition features. We hypothesized that tumors with higher metabolic activity instigate cachexia related peripheral metabolic alterations, and investigated whether tumor metabolic activity is associated with body composition and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), focusing on subcutaneous adipose tissue. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on a cohort of 173 patients with NSCLC. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans obtained before treatment were used to analyze tumor metabolic activity (standardized uptake value (SUV) and SUV normalized by lean body mass (SUL)) as well as body composition variables (subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue radiodensity (SAT/VAT radiodensity) and area; skeletal muscle radiodensity (SM radiodensity) and area). Subjects were divided into groups with high or low SAT radiodensity based on Youden Index of Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC). Associations between tumor metabolic activity, body composition variables, and survival were analyzed by Mann-Whitney tests, Cox regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of high SAT radiodensity was 50.9% (88/173). Patients with high SAT radiodensity had shorter survival compared with patients with low SAT radiodensity (mean: 45.3 vs. 50.5 months, p = 0.026). High SAT radiodensity was independently associated with shorter overall survival (multivariate Cox regression HR = 1.061, 95% CI: 1.022-1.101, p = 0.002). SAT radiodensity also correlated with tumor metabolic activity (SULpeak rs = 0.421, p = 0.029; SUVpeak rs = 0.370, p = 0.048). In contrast, the cross-sectional areas of SM, SAT, and VAT were not associated with tumor metabolic activity or survival. CONCLUSION: Higher SAT radiodensity is associated with higher tumor metabolic activity and shorter survival in patients with NSCLC. This may suggest that tumors with higher metabolic activity induce subcutaneous adipose tissue alterations such as decreased lipid density, increased fibrosis, or browning.

Cachexia Index as a Predictor of Reduced Survival in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The cachexia index is a novel indicator of cachexia, but its prognostic implications for survival outcomes have not been systematically assessed in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to examine the association between the cachexia index and survival outcomes in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Two independent reviewers searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies that evaluated the prognostic significance of the cachexia index in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. The prognostic value of the cachexia index was determined by combining the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirteen studies were identified, including a total of 4207 patients. Meta-analysis indicated that a lower cachexia index was associated with shorter overall survival (HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.78-2.66) and disease-free survival (HR 1.72; 95% CI 1.50-1.97) in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Further stratified analysis confirmed the significant association between a lower cachexia index and shorter overall survival in different study designs, regions, patients' age, sample sizes, gastrointestinal cancer subtypes, tumor stages, and follow-up duration subgroups. The cachexia index could be utilized as a predictor of overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. However, future prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Cancer cachexia as a predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer cachexia is a complex problem characterized by weight loss due to skeletal muscle and adipose tissue reduction. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to examine the association between cancer cachexia and adverse outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases from their inception to January 15, 2024. Retrospective or prospective studies that investigated the cancer cachexia as a predictor of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), or disease control rate (DCR) in NSCLC patients were included in this analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen studies, comprising 5919 NSCLC patients, were identified. The pooled prevalence of cachexia in NSCLC patients was 39%, with individual studies reporting rates ranging from 19% to 63.8%. A meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that cachexia was associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54-2.21) and PFS (HR 1.49; 95% CI 1.27-1.73). Subgroup analysis indicated that cancer cachexia significantly predicted OS, regardless of study design, NSCLC subtypes, cancer stage, definitions of cachexia, or follow-up duration. However, there was no clear association between cancer cachexia and ORR or DCR. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer cachexia emerges is a negative prognostic factor for OS and PFS in NSCLC patients. Assessing cancer cachexia can improve risk classification for survival outcomes in this patient population.

Malnutrition and cachexia may affect death but not functional improvement in patients with sarcopenic dysphagia.

PURPOSE: To investigate whether two factors, malnutrition and cachexia, affect swallowing function, activities of daily living (ADL), and death in sarcopenic dysphagia. METHODS: Of 467 patients enrolled in the Japanese Sarcopenic Dysphagia Database, 271 met the study eligibility criteria in a retrospective cohort study. Patients were divided into four groups based on whether they had cachexia according to the Asian Working Group for Cachexia (AWGC) criteria and malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria. Multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the differences in changes in the Food Intake LEVEL Scale (FILS) and Barthel Index (BI) and death after follow-up between the malnutrition and cachexia group and the other groups. RESULTS: The mean age was 83.7 ± 8.3 years, 119 (44%) were men and 152 (56%) were women. The median FILS at baseline was 7 and the median BI was 25. A total of 120 (44%) had malnutrition only, 54 (20%) had neither cachexia nor malnutrition, 12 (4%) had cachexia only, and 85 (31%) had both cachexia and malnutrition. Multivariate analyses showed no significant difference between the change in BI (P = 0.688) and the change in FILS (P = 0.928) between the malnutrition and cachexia group and the other groups; however, death increased significantly (P = 0.010). CONCLUSION: Some patients diagnosed with cachexia were not malnourished, although many patients with cachexia were malnourished. While patients with both cachexia and malnutrition did not show significant improvement in ADL and swallowing function compared with patients without both conditions, the number of deaths increased significantly.

Phase angle: A robust predictor of malnutrition and poor prognosis in gastrointestinal cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship among phase angle (PA), malnutrition, and prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. METHODS: In total, 870 patients with gastrointestinal cancer were enrolled. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the association between PA and survival risk. Restricted cubic spline regression was used for flexibility analysis to explore sex-specific associations between PA and survival. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationships among PA, malnutrition, and cachexia. RESULTS: Low PA was closely associated with poor physical conditions, diminished quality of life, and malnutrition. Patients with low PA had a significantly worse prognosis than those with high PA (60.6% versus 72.8%; log-rank P < 0.001). PA was suitable for the prognostic assessment of patients with advanced-stage tumors. Regardless of sex, patients with lower PA showed significantly poorer survival rates. Cox proportional hazards models identified PA as an independent predictor of prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer (hazard ratio (HR)=0.534; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.409-0.696, P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that a high PA was an independent risk factor affecting the prognoses of patients with esophageal, liver, and intrahepatic bile duct cancers. Interestingly, variations in PA had a more significant prognostic effect on survival in men than in women. The logistic regression model confirmed that PA is a valuable indicator for assessing malnutrition and cachexia in patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Among all body composition indicators, PA demonstrated the highest accuracy for prognostic prediction. CONCLUSIONS: PA was identified as a robust predictor of malnutrition and poor prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal cancer.

The association of body composition phenotypes before chemotherapy with epithelial ovarian cancer mortality.

BACKGROUND: The association of body composition with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) mortality is poorly understood. To date, evidence suggests that high adiposity is associated with decreased mortality (an obesity paradox), but the impact of muscle on this association has not been investigated. Herein, we define associations of muscle and adiposity joint-exposure body composition phenotypes with EOC mortality. METHODS: Body composition from 500 women in the Body Composition and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Survival Study was dichotomized as normal or low skeletal muscle index (SMI), a proxy for sarcopenia, and high or low adiposity. Four phenotypes were classified as fit (normal SMI and low adiposity; reference; 16.2%), overweight or obese (normal SMI and high adiposity; 51.2%), sarcopenia and overweight or obese (low SMI and high adiposity; 15.6%), and sarcopenia or cachexia (low SMI and low adiposity; 17%). We used multivariable Cox models to estimate associations of each phenotype with mortality for EOC overall and high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC). RESULTS: Overweight or obesity was associated with up to 51% and 104% increased mortality in EOC and HGSOC [Hazard Ratio (HR)] = 1.51, 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.19 and HR = 2.04, 95% CI = 1.29 to 3.21). Sarcopenia and overweight or obesity was associated with up to 66% and 67% increased mortality in EOC and HGSOC (HR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.13 to 2.45 and HR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.05 to 2.68). Sarcopenia or cachexia was associated with up to 73% and 109% increased mortality in EOC and HGSOC (HR = 1.73, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.63 and HR = 2.09, 95% CI = 1.25 to 3.50). CONCLUSIONS: Overweight or obesity, sarcopenia and overweight or obesity, and sarcopenia or cachexia phenotypes were each associated with increased mortality in EOC and HGSOC. Exercise and dietary interventions could be leveraged as ancillary treatment strategies for improving outcomes in the most fatal gynecological malignancy with no previously established modifiable prognostic factors.

Mortality burden of pre-treatment weight loss in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Cachexia, with weight loss (WL) as a major component, is highly prevalent in patients with cancer and indicates a poor prognosis. The primary objective of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to estimate the risk of mortality associated with cachexia (using established WL criteria prior to treatment initiation) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in studies identified through a systematic literature review. The review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Embase® and PubMed were searched to identify articles on survival outcomes in adult patients with NSCLC (any stage) and cachexia published in English between 1 January 2016 and 10 October 2021. Two independent reviewers screened titles, abstracts and full texts of identified records against predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Following a feasibility assessment, a meta-analysis evaluating the impact of cachexia, defined per the international consensus criteria (ICC), or of pre-treatment WL ≥ 5% without a specified time interval, on overall survival in patients with NSCLC was conducted using a random-effects model that included the identified studies as the base case. The impact of heterogeneity was evaluated through sensitivity and subgroup analyses. The standard measures of statistical heterogeneity were calculated. Of the 40 NSCLC publications identified in the review, 20 studies that used the ICC for cachexia or reported WL ≥ 5% and that performed multivariate analyses with hazard ratios (HRs) or Kaplan-Meier curves were included in the feasibility assessment. Of these, 16 studies (80%; n = 6225 patients; published 2016-2021) met the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis: 11 studies (69%) used the ICC and 5 studies (31%) used WL ≥ 5%. Combined criteria (ICC plus WL ≥ 5%) were associated with an 82% higher mortality risk versus no cachexia or WL < 5% (pooled HR [95% confidence interval, CI]: 1.82 [1.47, 2.25]). Although statistical heterogeneity was high (I2 = 88%), individual study HRs were directionally aligned with the pooled estimate, and there was considerable overlap in CIs across included studies. A subgroup analysis of studies using the ICC (HR [95% CI]: 2.26 [1.80, 2.83]) or WL ≥ 5% (HR [95% CI]: 1.28 [1.12, 1.46]) showed consistent findings. Assessments of methodological, clinical and statistical heterogeneity indicated that the meta-analysis was robust. Overall, this analysis found that ICC-defined cachexia or WL ≥ 5% was associated with inferior survival in patients with NSCLC. Routine assessment of both weight and weight changes in the oncology clinic may help identify patients with NSCLC at risk for worse survival, better inform clinical decision-making and assess eligibility for cachexia clinical trials.