Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
Add more filters











Publication year range
1.
Psicol. ciênc. prof ; 43: e249440, 2023. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS, Index Psychology - journals | ID: biblio-1431134

ABSTRACT

Este estudo tem como objetivo analisar traços da mentalidade potencialmente autoritária a partir do discurso de usuários do Facebook vinculados a páginas de cunho político autodeclarado de direita e de esquerda no Brasil. A Netnografia é utilizada como aporte metodológico para imersão on-line nas páginas "Eu era Direita e não sabia" e "Jovens de Esquerda", selecionadas por meio do Facebook Audience Insights, ferramenta disponibilizada pelo Facebook. Delas, foram extraídas oito postagens com maior engajamento (número de comentários, curtidas e compartilhamentos), identificadas pelo Netvizz. Foram coletados 3.489 comentários, os quais foram organizados em um corpus textual submetido ao software IRAMUTEQ e analisados sob a perspectiva da análise crítica imanente da teoria crítica. Como resultado, apresenta-se a forma como o pensamento autoritário se manifesta na racionalização da sociedade contemporânea e nas práticas discursivas em redes sociais on-line, enraizada no âmbito sociopolítico brasileiro, ameaçando o processo democrático e a construção de uma sociedade plural e liberta.(AU)


This study aims to analyze traits of the potentially authoritarian mentality from the speech of Facebook users linked to political pages self-declared as rightist and leftist in Brazil. Netnography is used as a methodological contribution for online immersion in the pages "Eu era Direita e não sabia" and "Jovens de Esquerda" selected via Facebook Audience Insights, a tool provided by Facebook. From these, eight posts with greater engagement (number of comments, likes and shares), identified by Netvizz, were extracted. We collected 3,489 comments, which were organized in a textual corpus submitted to IRAMUTEQ software and analyzed from the perspective of immanent critical analysis of Critical Theory. As a result, we present the way in which authoritarian thinking manifests itself in the rationalization of contemporary society and in discursive practices in online social networks, rooted in the Brazilian socio-political sphere, threatening the democratic process and the construction of a plural and free society.(AU)


Este estudio tiene como objetivo analizar las huellas de la mentalidad potencialmente autoritaria a partir de los discursos de usuarios en Facebook vinculados a páginas políticas autodeclaradas de derecha y de izquierda en Brasil. La netnografía se utiliza como marco metodológico para la inmersión en línea en las páginas "Eu era Direita e não sabia" y "Jovens de Esquerda", seleccionadas por Facebook Audience Insights, herramienta proporcionada por Facebook. Se extrajeron las ocho publicaciones con mayor compromiso (número de comentarios, gustos y compartidas), identificadas por Netvizz. Se recogieron 3.489 comentarios, los cuales fueron organizados en un corpus textual sometido al software IRAMUTEQ y analizado bajo la perspectiva del análisis crítico inmanente de la teoría crítica. Los resultados presentan la forma en que el pensamiento autoritario se manifiesta en la racionalización de la sociedad contemporánea y en prácticas discursivas en redes sociales en línea, arraigada en el ámbito sociopolítico brasileño, que amenazan el proceso democrático y la construcción de una sociedad plural y liberada.(AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Politics , Authoritarianism , Social Networking , Permissiveness , Persuasive Communication , Policy Making , Prejudice , Psychology , Scapegoating , Social Behavior , Social Change , Social Conformity , Social Desirability , Psychological Distance , Social Dominance , Social Identification , Social Isolation , Social Justice , Social Problems , Social Support , Social Welfare , Socioeconomic Factors , Sociology , Stereotyping , Unemployment , Social Control Policies , Attitude , Character , Conflict of Interest , Congress , Civil Rights , Civilization , Computer Security , Competitive Behavior , Community Participation , Cultural Diversity , Feminism , Internet , Journalism , Modernization of the Public Sector , Crime , Cybernetics , Legislative , Democracy , Whistleblowing , Dehumanization , Dissent and Disputes , Aggression , Racial Groups , Economics , Research Policy Evaluation , Information Society Indicators , Ethics , Altruism , Social Media , Sexism , Social Discrimination , External Debt , Social Skills , Self-Control , Diplomacy , Defamation , Censorship, Research , Health Governance , Harassment, Non-Sexual , Incivility , Political Activism , Cultural Rights , Freedom , Sustainable Development , Cyberbullying , Egocentrism , Corruption , Civil Society , Empowerment , Social Evolution , Social Defeat , Social Representation , Disinformation , Intersectional Framework , Social Cohesion , Citizenship , Psychological Well-Being , Government , Hate , Human Rights , Interpersonal Relations , Lobbying , Deception , Mass Behavior , Mass Media , Anonyms and Pseudonyms , Negativism
2.
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1434124

ABSTRACT

El documental Three Identical Strangers, de Tim Waldle (2018) revela una investigación secreta sobre el desarrollo de hermanos genéticamente idénticos separados de manera deliberada para ser criados en circunstancias diferentes. Desde su estreno el experimento expuesto ha provocado una serie de rechazos en la opinión pública y entre los profesionales de la salud mental. El presente trabajo analiza los argumentos de los psiquiatras y psicoanalistas Leon Hoffman y Lois Oppenheim, que han cuestionado el documental y defendido el experimento, para analizar sus argumentos y evaluar si los mismos son consistentes o, por el contrario, pretenden legitimar una investigación éticamente inaceptable


Tim Waldle documentary film Three Identical Strangers (2018), reveals a secret investigation on the development of genetically identical siblings who were separated on purpose so as to be raised in different social contexts. Since it´s premiere, the exposed experiment has caused a series of rejections among public opinion and mental health professionals. This paper focuses in the arguments of psychiatrists Leon Hoffman and Lois Oppenheim in defense of the experiment and against the film, so as to analyzse if their arguments are consistent, or on the contrary, they pretend to legitimate an ethically unacceptable investigation.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Child , Twins/genetics , Human Experimentation/ethics , Adoption , Censorship, Research , Family Structure
3.
4.
Cad. Ibero Am. Direito Sanit. (Impr.) ; 8(1): 141-146, jan.-mar. 2019.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-996372

ABSTRACT

A pressão ou a tentativa de constranger os pesquisadores é conduta que afronta à ordem jurídica brasileira. A mensagem dos pesquisadores é clara: os dados científicos apontam que estamos expondo a sociedade a níveis críticos de veneno. É contrária à Constituição e ao nosso modelo de organização social a postura de quem ataca o mensageiro, por mais incômodo que seja o conteúdo da mensagem.


Subject(s)
Humans , Agrochemicals/adverse effects , Censorship, Research
5.
Ambix ; 65(3): 210-231, 2018 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30134775

ABSTRACT

In the latter half of the sixteenth century the Roman Inquisition developed criteria to prosecute a series of operative arts, including various forms of divination and magic. Its officials had little interest in alchemy. During that period the Roman Inquisition tried few people for practising alchemy, and it was rarely discussed in official documents. Justifications for prosecuting alchemists did exist, however. In his influential handbook, Directorium inquisitorum, the fourteenth-century inquisitor Nicholas Eymerich had developed a clear rationale for the investigation and prosecution of alchemists as heretics. His position was endorsed in the 1570s by Francisco Peña in his commentary on Eymerich's handbook. In this article I explore the reasons why alchemy held this ambiguous status. I argue that members of the Dominican Order developed two traditions of thinking about alchemy from Aquinas's thought. The first, and closest to Aquinas's own belief, held that alchemy was a natural art that posed no danger to the Christian faith. The second, developed by Eymerich from a selective reading of Aquinas's writings, indicated specific circumstances in which alchemists could be investigated. The Roman Inquisition's response to alchemy vacillated between the positions advocated by Aquinas and Eymerich.


Subject(s)
Alchemy , Censorship, Research , Christianity/history , Religion and Science , History, 16th Century , History, Medieval , Rome
7.
Brasília; Conselho Nacional de Saúde; 12 nov. 2009. 1 p.
Non-conventional in Portuguese | CNS-BR | ID: biblio-1178521

ABSTRACT

Vem manifestar seu apoio à pesquisadora Raquel Maria Rigotto, Conselheira Nacional e Professora do Departamento de Saúde Comunitária da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC), e demais componentes da Comissão Multidisciplinar de Estudo pela realização de pesquisa sobre o nível de poluição emitido pela empresa NUFARM, nas proximidades de sua fábrica.


Subject(s)
Agrochemicals/toxicity , Air Pollution/analysis , Censorship, Research
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL