Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.475
Filter
1.
Ghana Med J ; 58(1): 44-52, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38957282

ABSTRACT

Objective: To compare cervical ripening time with the use of vaginal Misoprostol plus Hyoscine-N-Butylbromide, with vaginal Misoprostol alone. Design: A double-blind randomized controlled trial with Pan-African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR) approval number PACTR202112821475292. Setting: Federal Medical Centre, Asaba, Nigeria. Participants: A total of 126 eligible antenatal patients for cervical ripening were enrolled. Interventions: Participants in Group A had 25µg of vaginal misoprostol with 1ml of intramuscular placebo, and those in Group B had 25µg of vaginal misoprostol with 20mg of Intramuscular Hyoscine (1 ml). Oxytocin infusion was used when indicated, and the labour was supervised as per departmental protocol. Main outcome measure: Cervical ripening time. Results: The mean cervical ripening time was statistically significantly shorter in the hyoscine group (8.48±4.36 hours) than in the placebo group (11.40±7.33 hours); p-value 0.02, 95% CI 0.80-5.05. There was no statistically significant difference in the mean induction-delivery interval in Group A (7.38±5.28 hours) compared to Group B (7.75±5.04 hours), with a value of 0.54. The mode of delivery was comparable. However, women in Group B (53, 84.1%) achieved more vaginal deliveries than women in Group A (50, 79.4%); p-value 0.49. Thirteen women in Group A (20.6%) had a caesarean section, while ten women (15.9%) in Group B had a caesarean section (p-value 0.49, RR 0.94, CI 0.80-1.11). Adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes were not statistically significant between the two groups. Conclusion: Intramuscular hyoscine was effective in reducing cervical ripening time when used as an adjunct to vaginal Misoprostol, with no significant adverse maternal or neonatal outcome. Funding: None declared.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Misoprostol , Oxytocics , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Adult , Administration, Intravaginal , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Butylscopolammonium Bromide/administration & dosage , Nigeria , Labor, Induced/methods , Time Factors , Drug Therapy, Combination
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(7): 101388, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38825005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Catheter balloon insertion is a common method for cervical ripening and labor induction. Papaverine and its derivatives are musculotropic antispasmodic drugs that directly induce smooth muscle relaxation. Used during childbirth, these drugs have been suggested to shorten the duration of labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of administering papaverine before catheter balloon insertion on changes in Bishop scores and on the labor induction-to-delivery interval. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in a single tertiary university-affiliated hospital. Participants were admitted at term for labor induction with an initial Bishop score of ≤6. Participants were randomized to receive 80 mg intravenous papaverine or 0.9% normal saline solution within 30 minutes of Foley catheter balloon insertion. The co-primary outcomes were the difference in Bishop score from before catheter balloon insertion to after removal and the labor induction-to-delivery interval. The secondary outcomes included maternal pain and satisfaction scores, delivery within 24 hours, and neonatal outcomes. Both intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. RESULTS: Overall, 110 women were enrolled. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the median difference in Bishop score was greater in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (5 [interquartile range, 1-11] vs 4 [interquartile range, 0-7], respectively; P=.025), and the median catheter balloon insertion-to-delivery interval was shorter in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (21 hours [interquartile range, 6-95] vs 26 hours [interquartile range, 3-108], respectively; P=.031). A higher proportion of women delivered within 24-hours in the papaverine group than in the placebo group (65.5% vs 41.8%, respectively; P=.012). Pain and satisfaction scores, delivery, and neonatal outcomes were similar between the groups. Similar results were found in the per-protocol analysis. CONCLUSION: Papaverine administration before Foley catheter balloon insertion for cervical ripening resulted in improved Bishop scores and shorter catheter balloon insertion-to-delivery intervals.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced , Papaverine , Humans , Female , Papaverine/administration & dosage , Papaverine/pharmacology , Labor, Induced/methods , Adult , Pregnancy , Double-Blind Method , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Catheterization/methods , Catheterization/instrumentation , Patient Satisfaction , Time Factors
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 401, 2024 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38822253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Previous studies had found that the mechanical methods were as effective as pharmacological methods in achieving vaginal delivery. However, whether balloon catheter induction is suitable for women with severe cervical immaturity and whether it will increase the related risks still need to be further explored. RESEARCH AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter balloon for labor induction at term in primiparas with different cervical scores. METHODS: A total of 688 primiparas who received cervical ripening with a Foley catheter balloon were recruited in this study. They were divided into 2 groups: Group 1 (Bishop score ≤ 3) and Group 2 (3 < Bishop score < 7). Detailed medical data before and after using of balloon were faithfully recorded. RESULTS: The cervical Bishop scores of the two groups after catheter placement were all significantly higher than those before (Group 1: 5.49 ± 1.31 VS 2.83 ± 0.39, P<0.05; Group 2: 6.09 ± 1.00 VS 4.45 ± 0.59, P<0.05). The success rate of labor induction in group 2 was higher than that in group 1 (P<0.05). The incidence of intrauterine infection in Group 1 was higher than that in Group 2 (18.3% VS 11.3%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The success rates of induction of labor by Foley catheter balloon were different in primiparas with different cervical conditions, the failure rate of induction of labor and the incidence of intrauterine infection were higher in primiparas with severe cervical immaturity.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Cervix Uteri , Labor, Induced , Humans , Labor, Induced/methods , Female , Pregnancy , Retrospective Studies , Adult , Parity , Catheterization/methods , Term Birth , Young Adult , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Catheters
4.
Cells ; 13(7)2024 Mar 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38607039

ABSTRACT

The uterine cervix is one of the key factors involved in ensuring a proper track of gestation and labor. At the end of the gestational period, the cervix undergoes extensive changes, which can be summarized as a transformation from a non-favorable cervix to one that is soft and prone to dilation. During a process called cervical ripening, fundamental remodeling of the cervical extracellular matrix (ECM) occurs. The cervical ripening process is a derivative of many interlocking and mutually driving biochemical and molecular pathways under the strict control of mediators such as inflammatory cytokines, nitric oxide, prostaglandins, and reactive oxygen species. A thorough understanding of all these pathways and learning about possible triggering factors will allow us to develop new, better treatment algorithms and therapeutic goals that could protect women from both dysfunctional childbirth and premature birth. This review aims to present the possible role of the NLRP3 inflammasome in the cervical ripening process, emphasizing possible mechanisms of action and regulatory factors.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Premature Birth , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cervical Ripening/metabolism , Inflammasomes , NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein , Parturition
5.
Wiad Lek ; 77(2): 201-207, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38592979

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Aim: To investigate a correlation between cervical ripening, the immunological features and the hemodynamic characteristics of the cervix during the preparation for vaginal labor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and Methods: We examined 75 pregnant women at different gestational age. General clinical and immunological studies were conducted in order to check serum concentration of cytokines IL-6, IL-1ß, and TNF-α. Ultrasound and Doppler study were used to determine resistance index and systolic-diastolic ratio of blood flow in the common uterine artery as well as the descending and ascending parts and cervical stromal arteries. RESULTS: Results: Pregnant women with high cervical ripening score had high concentrations of the major proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1ß, IL-6, and TNF-α). Analysis of the of the cervical blood flow indicators of the studied groups showed significant differences in the indices of vascular resistance in the vessels that feed the cervix. Our data showed a significant correlation between the cervix ripening and both the serum levels of the studied cytokines and the level of peripheral vascular resistance indices in the common uterine arteries of the cervix, and the blood flow indices in the cervical stromal vessels. CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Our study shows that the process of preparing the woman's body for labor is associated with immunological adjustment and increased hemodynamics of the cervix. We report that cervical ripening is associated with the immunological components and hemodynamic parameters of the cervix at late-stage pregnancy. Measuring cervix ripening and the accompanied changes in cytokine levels and hemodynamic parameters will form a more accurate assessment of birth preparedness and labor complications.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri , Pregnant Women , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Cervix Uteri/diagnostic imaging , Cervix Uteri/physiology , Cervical Ripening , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha , Interleukin-6 , Cytokines , Hemodynamics
6.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(2): 886-890, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38477600

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Recently, two randomized controlled trials compared removal of cervical ripening balloon (CRB) after 6 versus 12 h. Their results showed similar Bishop score changes in both groups and a shorter time to delivery in the 6-h group. Neither of the studies was powered to show difference in mode of delivery. The aim of this study was to compare mode of delivery when the CRB was removed after 6 versus 12 h. METHODS: A historical control study comparing induction of labor with a CRB between two time periods, one in which the CRB was removed after 12 h (12-h group), and the other in which it was removed after 6 h (6-h group). We included term pregnancies with a singleton fetus in vertex presentation. We excluded patients with a previous cesarean delivery, failed ripening with prostaglandins prior to CRB insertion, and any contraindication for vaginal delivery. The primary outcome was mode of delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery within 24 h and other maternal and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: We included 1704 patients, 914 in the 12-h group, and 717 in the 6-h group. Removal after 6 h was associated with a lower rate of cesarean and instrumental deliveries (28.6% vs 22.5%, and 12% vs 6.2%, respectively) and a higher rate of vaginal delivery within 24 h. All differences were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Removing a cervical ripening balloon after 6 rather than 12 h is associated with reduced cesarean and instrumental delivery rates, and should be considered as a reasonable, and potentially superior alternative in labor induction protocols with intracervical ripening balloon.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Cesarean Section , Labor, Induced , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Labor, Induced/methods , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Pregnancy Outcome
7.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 53(5): 102770, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38503382

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare Foley catheter insertion by digital blind method to its placement with a sterile speculum in women with unripe cervix for induction of labor. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from inception to July 2023. Included studies compared digital to speculum placement of the Foley catheter for labor induction. Data from the included studies were extracted and pooled using RevMan software for meta-analysis. The primary outcome was pain score during the procedure measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included Foley catheter insertion duration, cesarean delivery rate, induction to delivery interval, Bishop score, need for other cervical ripening methods, maternal satisfaction, and maternal fever. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving a total of 600 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pain during the procedure and Foley catheter insertion duration were significantly reduced in the digital insertion group compared to the speculum-guided group (p < 0.05). The Bishop score showed a significant improvement in the digital Foley catheter placement group. However, there were no statistically significant differences in the cesarean delivery rate or the requirement for additional cervical ripening methods between the two groups. Maternal satisfaction with the delivery process was significantly improved in the digital insertion group (p < 0.001). Induction to delivery interval and maternal fever were comparable between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Digital placement of Foley catheter can be considered as an alternative to the sterile speculum method for pre-induction cervical ripening. More trials are required to confirm our findings.


Subject(s)
Labor, Induced , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Labor, Induced/methods , Labor, Induced/instrumentation , Female , Pregnancy , Cervical Ripening , Surgical Instruments , Cesarean Section/methods , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation
8.
BJOG ; 131(9): 1167-1180, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38425020

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Induction of labour (IOL) is common practice and different methods carry different effectiveness and safety profiles. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness, and maternal and perinatal safety outcomes of IOL with vaginal misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone using individual participant data from randomised clinical trials. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following databases were searched from inception to March 2023: CINAHL Plus, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group Trial Register, Ovid Embase, Ovid Emcare, Ovid MEDLINE, Scopus and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), with viable singleton gestation, no language restrictions, and all published and unpublished data. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: An individual participant data meta-analysis was carried out. MAIN RESULTS: Ten of 52 eligible trials provided individual participant data, of which two were excluded after checking data integrity. The remaining eight trials compared low-dose vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone, including 4180 women undergoing IOL, which represents 32.8% of all participants in the published RCTs. Of these, 2077 were assigned to low-dose vaginal misoprostol and 2103 were assigned to vaginal dinoprostone. Compared with vaginal dinoprostone, low-dose vaginal misoprostol had a comparable rate of vaginal birth. Composite adverse perinatal outcomes did not differ between the groups. Compared with vaginal dinoprostone, composite adverse maternal outcomes were significantly lower with low-dose vaginal misoprostol (aOR 0.80, 95% CI 0.65-0.98, P = 0.03, I2 = 0%). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose vaginal misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for IOL are comparable in terms of effectiveness and perinatal safety. However, low-dose vaginal misoprostol is likely to lead to a lower rate of composite adverse maternal outcomes than vaginal dinoprostone.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Dinoprostone , Labor, Induced , Misoprostol , Oxytocics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Humans , Female , Labor, Induced/methods , Misoprostol/administration & dosage , Misoprostol/adverse effects , Pregnancy , Dinoprostone/administration & dosage , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravaginal , Cervical Ripening/drug effects
9.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101349, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38490333

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Foley catheter insertion is frequently used for cervical ripening during the induction of labor. However, the insertion failure, safety, maternal side effects, complications, and satisfaction of digital compared with speculum-guided Foley catheter placement have not been evaluated in a large trial involving primigravida. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to compare the insertion failure rate of digital and speculum-based transcervical Foley catheter placement in primigravida. The co-primary outcome was insertion-associated pain. The secondary outcomes were the time required for successful insertion, maternal satisfaction, and maternal complications within 24 hours of Foley insertion. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized, open-label, parallel-arm, noninferiority clinical trial was performed in a large tertiary care university hospital. Primigravida aged >18 years with term gestation (≥37 weeks) were included in this study. Additional inclusion criteria for enrollment in this study were singleton pregnancy with a cephalic presentation, intact membrane, a Bishop score of ≤5, and reassuring preinduction fetal heart rate tracing. All women planned for cervical ripening were assessed for eligibility and were randomized into digital or speculum arms. Foley catheter insertion was performed in a supine lithotomy position. Vaginal and cervical cleaning were performed before insertion. A 22-French Foley balloon catheter was guided digitally or via speculum to position the bulb at the level of the internal os using water-soluble lubricant. Insertion-associated pain was measured using a visual numeric rating scale, and maternal satisfaction was assessed using a set of questions. RESULTS: Four hundred and sixty-nine pregnant women were assessed for eligibility, and 446 patients were enrolled and randomized. The median age of the parturients was 24 (19-40) and 24 (18-38) years, respectively. The body mass index, gestational age at randomization, the incidence of postdated pregnancy, and prerandomization Bishop scores were comparable. Insertion failure was observed in 24 (10.8%) and 17 (7.6%) women in digital and speculum arms, respectively (relative risk=1.41 [95% confidence interval, 0.78-2.55]; P=.25). Requirements of >1 attempt (5.4% vs 3.6%) followed by the change in hands (3.6% vs 2.7%) were the most common reasons for insertion failure. The median (interquartile range) visual numeric rating scale was comparable (6 [2-9] vs 5 [2-10]; P=.15). The time taken for successful insertion was similar (58 [12-241] vs 54 [10-281]; P=.30). 9.4% and 10.8% of women required additional methods of cervical ripening. More women in the speculum group (41.7% vs 33.2%; P=.06) felt a medium level of discomfort than the digital group. CONCLUSION: Insertion failure and insertion-related pain in the digital approach were comparable to the speculum-guided approach for transcervical Foley catheter insertion in primigravida for cervical ripening. Nevertheless, maternal satisfaction was higher in the digital group because of a lesser level of discomfort.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Gravidity , Labor, Induced , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Cervical Ripening/physiology , Adult , Labor, Induced/methods , Labor, Induced/instrumentation , Urinary Catheterization/methods , Urinary Catheterization/instrumentation , Surgical Instruments , Patient Satisfaction , Young Adult
10.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101325, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38447677

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Vaginal examination to monitor labor progress is recommended at least every 4 hours, but it can cause pain and embarrassment to women. Trial data are limited on the best intensity for vaginal examination. Vaginal examination is not needed for oxytocin dose titration after an amniotomy has been performed and oxytocin infusion started. The Foley balloon commonly ripens the cervix without strong contractions. Amniotomy and oxytocin infusion are usually required to drive labor. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the first vaginal examination at 8 vs 4 hours after amniotomy-oxytocin after Foley ripening in multiparous labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial was conducted from October 2021 to September 2022 at the University Malaya Medical Center, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Multiparas at term were recruited at admission for labor induction. Participants were randomized to a first routine vaginal examination at 8 or 4 hours after Foley balloon ripening and amniotomy. Titrated oxytocin infusion was routinely commenced after amniotomy to initiate contractions. The 2 primary outcomes were the time from amniotomy to delivery (noninferiority hypothesis) and maternal satisfaction (superiority hypothesis). Data were analyzed using the Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and chi-square test (or Fisher exact test), as suitable for the data. RESULTS: A total of 204 women were randomized, 102 to each arm. Amniotomy to birth intervals were 4.97±2.47 hours in the 8-hour arm and 5.79±3.17 hours in the 4-hour arm (mean difference, -0.82; 97.5% confidence interval, -1.72 to 0.08; P=.041; Bonferroni correction), which were noninferior within the prespecified 2-hour upper margin, and the maternal satisfaction scores (11-point 0-10 numerical rating scale) with allocated labor care were 9 (interquartile range, 8-9) in the 8-hour arm and 8 (interquartile range, 7-9) in the 4-hour arm (P=.814). In addition, oxytocin infusion to birth interval difference was noninferior within the 97.5% confidence interval (-1.59 to 0.23) margin of 1.3 hours. Of the maternal outcomes, the amniotomy to first vaginal examination intervals were 3.9±1.8 hours in the 8-hour arm and 3.4±1.3 hours in the 4-hour arm (P=.026), and the numbers of vaginal examinations were 2.00 (interquartile range, 2.00-3.00) in the 8-hour arm and 3.00 (interquratile range, 2.00-3.25) in the 4-hour arm (P<.001). For the 8-hour arm, the first vaginal examination was less likely to be as scheduled and more likely to be indicated by sensation to bear down (P<.001), and the epidural analgesia rates were lower (13/102 participants [12.7%] in the 8-hour arm vs 28/102 participants [27.5%] in the 4-hour arm; relative risk, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.84; P=.009). Other outcomes of the mode of delivery, indications for cesarean delivery, and delivery blood loss were not different. Neonatal outcomes were not different. CONCLUSION: Routine first vaginal examination at 8 hours compared with that at 4 hours was noninferior for the time to birth but did not improve maternal satisfaction.


Subject(s)
Amniotomy , Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced , Oxytocics , Oxytocin , Humans , Female , Labor, Induced/methods , Pregnancy , Adult , Amniotomy/methods , Oxytocics/administration & dosage , Oxytocin/administration & dosage , Cervical Ripening/physiology , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Malaysia , Time Factors , Parity , Patient Satisfaction
11.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S669-S695, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462252

ABSTRACT

This review assessed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents (prostaglandins, oxytocin, mifepristone, hyaluronidase, and nitric oxide donors) and mechanical methods (single- and double-balloon catheters, laminaria, membrane stripping, and amniotomy) and those generally considered under the rubric of complementary medicine (castor oil, nipple stimulation, sexual intercourse, herbal medicine, and acupuncture). A substantial body of published reports, including 2 large network meta-analyses, support the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (PGE1) when used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol administered vaginally at doses of 50 µg has the highest probability of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Regardless of dosing, route, and schedule of administration, when used for cervical ripening and labor induction, prostaglandin E2 seems to have similar efficacy in decreasing cesarean delivery rates. Globally, although oxytocin represents the most widely used pharmacologic agent for labor induction, its effectiveness is highly dependent on parity and cervical status. Oxytocin is more effective than expectant management in inducing labor, and the efficacy of oxytocin is enhanced when combined with amniotomy. However, prostaglandins administered vaginally or intracervically are more effective in inducing labor than oxytocin. A single 200-mg oral tablet of mifepristone seems to represent the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening. The bulk of the literature assessing relaxin suggests this agent has limited benefit when used for this indication. Although intracervical injection of hyaluronidase may cause cervical ripening, the need for intracervical administration has limited the use of this agent. Concerning the vaginal administration of nitric oxide donors, including isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide, nitroglycerin, and sodium nitroprusside, the higher incidence of side effects with these agents has limited their use. A synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator has been found to be effective for preinduction cervical ripening. Although a pharmacologic agent may be administered after the use of the synthetic hygroscopic dilator, in an attempt to reduce the interval to vaginal delivery, concomitant use of mechanical and pharmacologic methods is being explored. Combining the use of a single-balloon catheter with dinoprostone, misoprostol, or oxytocin enhances the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in cervical ripening and labor induction. The efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening and labor induction seems similar. To date, the combination of misoprostol with an intracervical catheter seems to be the best approach when balancing delivery times with safety. Although complementary methods are occasionally used by patients, given the lack of data documenting their efficacy and safety, these methods are rarely used in hospital settings.


Subject(s)
Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal , Misoprostol , Oxytocics , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Cervical Ripening , Dinoprostone , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/adverse effects , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/pharmacology , Labor, Induced/methods , Mifepristone , Nitric Oxide Donors/adverse effects , Nitric Oxide Donors/pharmacology , Oxytocin
12.
J Am Board Fam Med ; 37(1): 147-149, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38448237

ABSTRACT

In pregnant patients at term undergoing induction of labor, early time-based artificial rupture of membranes (AROM) within 1 hour of Foley bulb expulsion results in a shorter duration of labor by nearly 9 hours with no significant difference in cesarean delivery rates or maternal or neonatal adverse outcomes.1.


Subject(s)
Amniotomy , Cervical Ripening , Pregnancy , Female , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Cesarean Section , Time Factors , Labor, Induced/methods
13.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S716-S728.e61, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462254

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have summarized the evidence on the efficacy and safety of various outpatient cervical ripening methods. However, the method with the highest efficacy and safety profile has not been determined conclusively. We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening methods currently employed in the outpatient setting. DATA SOURCES: With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian, we performed a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov. We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to January 14, 2020. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We considered randomized controlled trials comparing a variety of methods for outpatient cervical ripening. METHODS: We conducted a frequentist random effects network meta-analysis employing data from randomized controlled trials. We performed a direct, pairwise meta-analysis to compare the efficacy of various outpatient cervical ripening methods, including placebo. We employed ranking strategies to determine the most efficacious method using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve; a higher surface under the cumulative ranking curve value implied a more efficacious method. We assessed the following outcomes: time from intervention to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, changes in the Bishop score, need for additional ripening methods, incidence of Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, and uterine hyperstimulation. RESULTS: We included data from 42 randomized controlled trials including 6093 participants. When assessing the efficacy of all methods, 25 µg vaginal misoprostol was the most efficacious in reducing the time from intervention to delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 1.0) without increasing the odds of cesarean delivery, the need for additional ripening methods, the incidence of a low Apgar score, or uterine hyperstimulation. Acupressure (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.3) and primrose oil (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.2) were the least effective methods in reducing the time to delivery interval. Among effective methods, 50 mg oral mifepristone was associated with the lowest odds of cesarean delivery (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9). CONCLUSION: When balancing efficacy and safety, vaginal misoprostol 25 µg represents the best method for outpatient cervical ripening.


Subject(s)
Misoprostol , Oxytocics , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Misoprostol/therapeutic use , Oxytocics/therapeutic use , Cervical Ripening , Network Meta-Analysis , Outpatients , Labor, Induced/methods
14.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(3S): S759-S768, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38462256

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Slow progression of labor is a common obstetrical problem with multiple associated complications. Tafoxiparin is a depolymerized form of heparin with a molecular structure that eliminates the anticoagulant effects of heparin. We report on 2 phase II clinical studies of tafoxiparin in primiparas. Study 1 was an exploratory, first-in-pregnant-women study and study 2 was a dose-finding study. OBJECTIVE: Study 1 was performed to explore the effects on labor time of subcutaneous administration of tafoxiparin before onset of labor. Study 2 was performed to test the hypothesis that intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin reduces the risk for prolonged labor after spontaneous labor onset in situations requiring oxytocin stimulation because of dystocia. STUDY DESIGN: Both studies were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. Participants were healthy, nulliparous females aged 18 to 45 years with a normal singleton pregnancy and gestational age confirmed by ultrasound. The primary endpoints were time from onset of established labor (cervical dilation of 4 cm) until delivery (study 1) and time from start of study treatment infusion until delivery (study 2). In study 1, patients at 38 to 40 weeks of gestation received 60 mg tafoxiparin or placebo daily as 0.4 mL subcutaneous injections until labor onset (maximum 28 days). In study 2, patients experiencing slow progression of labor, a prolonged latent phase, or labor arrest received a placebo or 1 of 3 short-term tafoxiparin regimens (initial bolus 7, 21, or 35 mg followed by continuous infusion at 5, 15, or 25 mg/hour until delivery; maximum duration, 36 hours) in conjunction with oxytocin. RESULTS: The number of participants randomized in study 1 was 263, and 361 were randomized in study 2. There were no statistically significant differences in the primary endpoints between those receiving tafoxiparin and those receiving the placebo in both studies. However, in study 1, the risk for having a labor time exceeding 12 hours was significantly reduced by tafoxiparin (tafoxiparin 6/114 [5%] vs placebo 18/101 [18%]; P=.0045). Post hoc analyses showed that women who underwent labor induction had a median (range) labor time of 4.44 (1.2-8.5) hours with tafoxiparin and 7.03 (1.5-14.3) hours with the placebo (P=.0041) and that co-administration of tafoxiparin potentiates the effect of oxytocin and facilitates a shorter labor time among women with a labor time exceeding 6 to 8 hours (P=.016). Among women induced into labor, tafoxiparin had a positive effect on cervical ripening in 11 of 13 cases (85%) compared with 3 of 13 participants (23%) who received the placebo (P=.004). For women requiring oxytocin because of slow progression of labor, the corresponding results were 34 of 51 participants (66%) vs 16 of 40 participants (40%) (P=.004). In study 2, tafoxiparin had no positive effects on the secondary endpoints when compared with the placebo. Except for injection-site reactions in study 1, adverse events were no more common for tafoxiparin than for the placebo among either mothers or infants. There were few serious or treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous treatment with tafoxiparin before labor onset (study 1) may be effective in reducing the labor time among women undergoing labor induction and among those requiring oxytocin for slow progression of labor. Moreover, tafoxiparin may have a positive effect on cervical ripening. Short-term, intravenous treatment with tafoxiparin as an adjunct to oxytocin in patients with labor arrest (study 2) did not affect labor time or other endpoints. Both studies suggest that tafoxiparin has a favorable safety profile in mothers and their infants.


Subject(s)
Oxytocics , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Oxytocin/therapeutic use , Pharmaceutical Preparations , Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced/methods , Heparin , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
15.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 166(2): 607-616, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38321823

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One in four labors are induced. The process of cervical ripening can be lengthy and pre-labor hospitalization is required. Outpatient cervical ripening can be an attractive alternative. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of outpatient cervical ripening with a balloon catheter compared with inpatient balloon catheter or prostaglandin E2 (PGE2). SEARCH STRATEGY: The PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from their inception to October 15, 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing the outpatient balloon catheter with inpatient balloon catheter or inpatient PGE2 for term cervical ripening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The primary outcome was the cesarean delivery rate. The secondary outcomes included instrumental delivery, the time from intervention-to-birth, oxytocin augmentation, total hospital duration, and maternal/neonatal adverse events. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-nine randomized controlled trials with a total of 6004 participants were identified. No difference in the cesarean delivery rate was revealed among the three interventions. Compared with inpatient balloon catheter, outpatient balloon catheter had shorter total hospital duration (mean difference -8.58, 95% confidence interval -17.02 to -1.10). No differences were revealed in the time from intervention-to-birth, instrumental delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, 5-min Apgar score less than 7, umbilical cord arterial pH less than 7.1, and neonatal intensive care unit admission among the three interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient balloon catheter in low-risk term pregnancies is an available option that could be considered for cervical ripening. The safety and effectiveness are comparable to inpatient cervical ripening methods.


Subject(s)
Bayes Theorem , Cervical Ripening , Cesarean Section , Labor, Induced , Network Meta-Analysis , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Ambulatory Care/methods , Catheters , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Dinoprostone/administration & dosage , Labor, Induced/methods , Outpatients , Oxytocics/administration & dosage
16.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(4): 101318, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38417552

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Outpatient term preinduction cervical ripening with mechanical agents has been associated with reduced length of stay, decreased cesarean delivery rates, low maternal and neonatal complications, and increased incidence of vaginal delivery within 24 hours. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to demonstrate equivalent efficacy between synthetic hygroscopic dilators and the single-balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening. STUDY DESIGN: This randomized control equivalence trial compared synthetic hygroscopic dilators with the 30-mL silicone single-balloon catheter in primiparous and multiparous patients undergoing labor induction. The primary outcome was time from admission to delivery, with a prespecified 3-hour margin of equivalence. The secondary objectives were patient outcomes and perspectives. RESULTS: Between March 1, 2019, and May 31, 2021, 1605 patients met the screening criteria, and 174 patients completed the study. The mean admission-to-delivery time was equivalent at 18.01 hours for the dilator group vs 17.55 hours for the balloon group (P=.04). The cesarean delivery rate of primiparous patients was similar at 28.1% with dilators vs 29.7% with the balloon. The groups had similar median cervical dilation and pain scores on insertion and admission. Overall patient satisfaction was high, 92.8% with dilators vs 96.2% with the balloon. The balloon group had significantly higher rates of early admission and device expulsion. CONCLUSION: Although the enrollment goal was not met, our study suggests that synthetic hygroscopic dilators and the single-balloon catheter for outpatient cervical ripening are both efficacious with similar time from admission to delivery, pain scores, and patient satisfaction with the procedure.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced , Humans , Female , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Pregnancy , Adult , Labor, Induced/methods , Cesarean Section/methods , Cesarean Section/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction , Dilatation/methods , Dilatation/instrumentation , Ambulatory Care/methods , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data
17.
Complement Med Res ; 31(3): 215-221, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38377980

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been developed for cervical ripening. The data regarding the efficiency of evening primrose oil (EPO) are inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcomes of EPO use on cervical ripening in low-risk women with term pregnancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Low-risk term pregnant women referred to the obstetrics clinic of Imam Hossein Hospital in Tehran who were eligible according to the inclusion were randomized either to the case or control group. The case group received 1,000 mg vaginal EPO capsule, and the other group received a vaginal placebo capsule daily, similar to the original drug. The primary outcome was Bishop score, while the duration of labor phases and the inducing procedures were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-eight participants were randomized to each group and were considered for data analysis. Although Bishop score was not statistically different before the intervention, it was significantly higher in case group compared to the placebo group after the intervention (EPO = 5.83 ± 1.68, placebo = 5.19 ± 1.52, p value = 0.002). Four participants in the case group and two in the control group underwent cesarean section (p value = 0.677). The need for labor induction was significantly higher in the placebo group than EPO group (oxytocin injection: 10.4% vs. 31.3%, p value = 0.012, amniotomy: 75% vs. 41.7, p value = 0.001). CONCLUSION: The vaginal use of EPO could be considered as a safe and efficient approach for cervical ripening in low-risk term pregnant women.HintergrundEs wurden verschiedene Methoden zur Zervixreifung entwickelt. Die Daten zur Wirksamkeit von Nachtkerzenöl (evening primrose oil, EPO) sind uneinheitlich. Mit dieser Studie sollen die Ergebnisse der Anwendung von EPO zur Zervixreifung bei Frauen mit niedrigem Risiko und termingerechter Schwangerschaft untersucht werden.Patientinnen und MethodenSchwangere Frauen mit niedrigem Risiko und termingerechter Schwangerschaft, die in die Geburtsklinik des Imam-Hossein-Krankenhauses in Teheran eingewiesen wurden und gemäss den Einschlusskriterien für die Teilnahme infrage kamen, wurden randomisiert der Fall- oder der Kontrollgruppe zugewiesen. Die Fallgruppe erhielt 1.000 mg EPO als Vaginalkapseln, während die andere Gruppe täglich eine vaginale Placebokapsel erhielt, die dem Originalpräparat ähnelte. Primäres Zielkriterium war der Bishop-Score und sekundäre Zielkriterien waren die Dauer der Wehenphasen sowie die Verfahren zur Geburtseinleitung.ErgebnisseJeder Gruppe wurden randomisiert 48 Teilnehmerinnen zugewiesen und bei der Datenanalyse berücksichtigt. Während vor der Intervention kein statistisch signifikanter Unterschied im Bishop-Score bestand, fiel dieser nach der Intervention in der Fallgruppe signifikant höher aus als in der Placebogruppe (EPO = 5,83 ± 1,68, Placebo = 5,19 ± 1,52, p-Wert = 0,002). Bei vier Teilnehmerinnen in der Fallgruppe und zwei in der Kontrollgruppe wurde ein Kaiserschnitt durchgeführt (p-Wert = 0,677). Die Notwendigkeit einer Weheneinleitung war in der Placebogruppe signifikant höher als in der EPO-Gruppe (Oxytocin-Injektion: 10,4% vs. 31,3%, p-Wert = 0,012, Amniotomie: 75% vs. 41,7%, p-Wert = 0,001).SchlussfolgerungDie vaginale Anwendung von EPO kann als sicherer und wirksamer Ansatz zur Zervixreifung bei Frauen mit niedrigem Risiko und termingerechter Schwangerschaft angesehen werden.


Subject(s)
Cervical Ripening , Linoleic Acids , Oenothera biennis , Plant Oils , gamma-Linolenic Acid , Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Adult , Double-Blind Method , Plant Oils/therapeutic use , gamma-Linolenic Acid/therapeutic use , gamma-Linolenic Acid/administration & dosage , Linoleic Acids/therapeutic use , Cervical Ripening/drug effects , Young Adult , Iran
18.
Obstet Gynecol ; 143(5): 670-676, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38422505

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of applying tension to a transcervical Foley balloon on delivery time in term nulliparous patients undergoing labor induction. METHODS: This cluster randomized clinical trial included 279 term nulliparous women presenting for labor induction with a plan for cervical ripening through transcervical Foley balloon placement. Participants were assigned to either the tension group (n=138) or the no-tension group (n=141) on the basis of randomized, weekly clusters (26 total clusters). The primary outcome measured was the time from initial Foley balloon insertion to delivery. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery rates, peripartum infection, and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Our prior data suggested that delivery time in the tension group would be about 1,053 minutes. We estimated a sample size of 260 (130 per group, 26 clusters) on the basis of a 25% difference, power of 80%, and two-sided α of 0.05. RESULTS: A total of 279 term nulliparous patients were included in the analysis. The median time from Foley placement to delivery was 1,596 minutes (range 430-3,438 minutes) for the tension group and 1,621 minutes (range 488-3,323 minutes) for the no-tension group ( P =.8); similar results were noted for time to vaginal delivery. No significant differences were observed in the secondary outcomes, including the rates of cesarean delivery (34.1% vs 29.8%, P =.7), peripartum infection, and NICU admission, between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Applying tension to a transcervical Foley balloon in term nulliparous women undergoing labor induction did not significantly reduce delivery time or improve secondary outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05404776.


Subject(s)
Labor, Induced , Oxytocics , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Humans , Female , Labor, Induced/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/methods , Cesarean Section , Catheterization/methods , Parity , Cervical Ripening
19.
J Anesth ; 38(2): 215-221, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300361

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To clarify whether the duration from cervical ripening induction to labor onset is prolonged when epidural analgesia is administered following application of dinoprostone vaginal inserts vs. cervical ripening balloon. METHODS: This retrospective study included mothers with singleton deliveries at a single center between 2020-2021. Nulliparous women who underwent labor induction and requested epidural analgesia during labor after 37 weeks of gestation were included. The duration from cervical ripening induction to labor onset was compared between women using a dinoprostone vaginal insert and those using a cervical ripening balloon and between women who received epidural analgesia before and after labor onset. RESULTS: In the dinoprostone vaginal insert group, the duration was significantly shorter in the subgroup that received epidural analgesia after labor onset (estimated median, 545 [95% confidence interval: 229-861 min]) than the subgroup that received it before labor onset (estimated median, 1,570 [95% confidence interval: 1,226-1,914] min, p = 0.004). However, in the cervical ripening balloon group, the difference between subgroups was not significant. The length of labor among the groups was also not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Epidural analgesia as labor relaxant adversely affected the progression of uterine cervical ripening when dinoprostone vaginal inserts were used, whereas it did not affect cervical ripening when a mechanical cervical dilatation balloon was used. The present results are significant for choosing the appropriate ripening method.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural , Oxytocics , Pregnancy , Female , Humans , Dinoprostone/pharmacology , Retrospective Studies , Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced/methods
20.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(5): 567.e1-567.e11, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38367749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of amniotomy during labor induction is a topic of ongoing debate due to the potential risks associated with both amniotomy and prolonged labor. As such, individuals in the field of obstetrics and gynecology must carefully evaluate the associated benefits and drawbacks of this procedure. While amniotomy can expedite the labor process, it may also lead to complications such as umbilical cord prolapse, fetal distress, and infection. Therefore, a careful and thorough examination of the risks and benefits of amniotomy during labor induction is essential in making an informed decision regarding the optimal timing of this procedure. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine if an amniotomy within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal reduced the duration of active labor and time taken to achieve vaginal delivery when compared with an amniotomy ≥4 hours after balloon removal among term pregnant women who underwent labor induction. STUDY DESIGN: This was an open-label, randomized controlled trial that was conducted at a single academic center from October 2020 to March 2023. Term participants who were eligible for preinduction cervical ripening with a Foley balloon were randomized into 2 groups, namely the early amniotomy (rupture of membranes within 2 hours after Foley balloon removal) and delayed amniotomy (rupture of membranes performed more than 4 hours after Foley balloon removal) groups. Randomization was stratified by parity. The primary outcome was time from Foley balloon insertion to active phase of labor. Secondary outcomes, including time to delivery, cesarean delivery rates, and maternal and neonatal complications, were analyzed using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. RESULTS: Of the 150 participants who consented and were enrolled, 149 were included in the analysis. In the intention-to-treat population, an early amniotomy did not significantly shorten the time between Foley balloon insertion and active labor when compared with a delayed amniotomy (885 vs 975 minutes; P=.08). An early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time from Foley balloon placement to active labor in nulliparous individuals (1211; 584-2340 vs 1585; 683-2760; P=.02). When evaluating the secondary outcomes, an early amniotomy was associated with a significantly shorter time to active labor onset (312.5 vs 442.5 minutes; P=.02) and delivery (484 vs 587 minutes; P=.03) from Foley balloon removal with a higher rate of delivery within 36 hours (96% vs 85%; P=.03). Individuals in the early amniotomy group reached active labor 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon insertion than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-2.2; P=.02). Those with an early amniotomy also reached vaginal delivery 1.5 times faster after Foley balloon removal than those in the delayed group (hazard ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1-2.2; P=.03). A delayed amniotomy was associated with a higher rate of postpartum hemorrhage (0% vs 9.5%; P=.01). No significant differences were observed in the cesarean delivery rates, length of hospital stay, maternal infection, or neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSION: Although an early amniotomy does not shorten the time from Foley balloon insertion to active labor, it shortens time from Foley balloon removal to active labor and delivery without increasing complications. The increased postpartum hemorrhage rate in the delayed amniotomy group suggests increased risks with delayed amniotomy.


Subject(s)
Amniotomy , Cervical Ripening , Labor, Induced , Humans , Female , Labor, Induced/methods , Pregnancy , Adult , Amniotomy/methods , Time Factors , Catheterization/methods , Delivery, Obstetric/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...