ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The health of India's children has improved over the past thirty years. Rates of morbidity and anthropometric failure have decreased. What remains unknown, however, is how those patterns have changed when examined by socioeconomic status. We examine changes in 11 indicators of child health by household wealth and maternal education between 1993 and 2021 to fill this critical gap in knowledge. Doing so could lead to policies that better target the most vulnerable children. METHODS: We used data from five rounds of India's National Family Health Survey conducted in 1993, 1999, 2006, 2016, and 2021 for this repeated cross-sectional analysis. We studied mother-reported cases of acute respiratory illness and diarrhea, hemoglobin measurements for anemia, and height and weight measurements for anthropometric failure. We examined how the prevalence rates of each outcome changed between 1993 and 2021 by household wealth and maternal education. We repeated this analysis for urban and rural communities. RESULTS: The socioeconomic gradient in 11 indicators of child health flattened between 1993 and 2021. This was in large part due to large reductions in the prevalence among children in the lowest socioeconomic groups. For most outcomes, the largest reductions occurred before 2016. Yet as of 2021, except for mild anemia, outcome prevalence remained the highest among children in the lowest socioeconomic groups. Furthermore, we show that increases in the prevalence of stunting and wasting between 2016 and 2021 are largely driven by increases in the severe forms of these outcomes among children in the highest socioeconomic groups. This finding underscores the importance of examining child health outcomes by severity. CONCLUSIONS: Despite substantial reductions in the socioeconomic gradient in 11 indicators of child health between 1993 and 2021, outcome prevalence remained the highest among children in the lowest socioeconomic groups in most cases. Thus, our findings emphasize the need for a continued focus on India's most vulnerable children.
Subject(s)
Child Health , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , India/epidemiology , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Child, Preschool , Child Health/trends , Child Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Infant , Child , Anemia/epidemiology , Health Status Disparities , Social Class , Prevalence , Health Surveys , Educational Status , Rural Population/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
The long-term trends in maternal and child health (MCH) in China and the national-level factors that may be associated with these changes have been poorly explored. This study aimed to assess trends in MCH indicators nationally and separately in urban and rural areas and the impact of public policies over a 30âyear period. An ecological study was conducted using data on neonatal mortality rate (NMR), infant mortality rate (IMR), under-five mortality rate (U5MR), and maternal mortality ratio (MMR) nationally and separately in urban and rural areas in China from 1991 to 2020. Joinpoint regression models were used to estimate the annual percentage changes (APC), average annual percentage changes (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and mortality differences between urban and rural areas. From 1991 to 2020, maternal and child mortalities in China gradually declined (national AAPC [95% CI]: NMRs - 7.7% [- 8.6%, - 6.8%], IMRs - 7.5% [- 8.4%, - 6.6%], U5MRs - 7.5% [- 8.5%, - 6.5%], MMRs - 5.0% [- 5.7%, - 4.4%]). However, the rate of decline nationally in child mortality slowed after 2005, and in maternal mortality after 2013. For all indicators, the decline in mortality was greater in rural areas than in urban areas. The AAPCs in rate differences between rural and urban areas were - 8.5% for NMRs, - 8.6% for IMRs, - 7.7% for U5MRs, and - 9.6% for MMRs. The AAPCs in rate ratios (rural vs. urban) were - 1.2 for NMRs, - 2.1 for IMRs, - 1.7 for U5MRs, and - 1.9 for MMRs. After 2010, urbanârural disparity in MMR did not diminish and in NMR, IMR, and U5MR, it gradually narrowed but persisted. MCH indicators have declined at the national level as well as separately in urban and rural areas but may have reached a plateau. Urbanârural disparities in MCH indicators have narrowed but still exist. Regular analyses of temporal trends in MCH are necessary to assess the effectiveness of measures for timely adjustments.
Subject(s)
Child Health , Child Mortality , Infant Mortality , Maternal Health , Maternal Mortality , Rural Population , Urban Population , Humans , China/epidemiology , Child Health/trends , Female , Infant , Maternal Health/trends , Infant Mortality/trends , Child, Preschool , Child Mortality/trends , Maternal Mortality/trends , Child , Infant, Newborn , MaleSubject(s)
Biomedical Research , Child Health , Internationality , Microbiota , Child , Humans , Biomedical Research/trends , Child Health/trends , Global Health/trendsSubject(s)
Biomedical Research , Child Health , Pediatricians , Research Personnel , Child , Humans , Biomedical Research/trends , Child Health/trends , Goals , United NationsABSTRACT
Introducción: La pediatría social se orienta hacia la atención integral del niño. Estudia las causas sociales que alteran su salud y también los problemas de esta índole que repercuten en su entorno social. En el contexto de la actual pandemia, caracterizada por alta morbilidad y mortalidad, se produjeron significativas consecuencias psicosociales. Objetivo: Describir el impacto de la pediatría social sobre la salud infanto-juvenil durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó una revisión en las bases de datos bibliográficas PubMed y BVS. Se empleó el Google Académico como motor de búsqueda. Se utilizaron, en español y en inglés, los siguientes descriptores: pediatría social, pandemia COVID-19, aislamiento social, bienestar psicológico, salud mental y población pediátrica. Análisis y síntesis de la información: Se expusieron argumentos desde la mirada psicosocial del pediatra, relacionados con el desarrollo y el bienestar socioemocional de los niños, y la repercusión sobre ellos del aislamiento social; además, se describió el impacto de la pandemia en la infancia, y el papel desempeñado por el especialista y otros profesionales vinculados con la atención pediátrica. Conclusiones: La pandemia se caracterizó por afectar todas las esferas de la vida del niño. La pediatría social resultó indispensable en el enfrentamiento de las consecuencias médico-biológicas, psicológicas y sociales que ocasionó el azote de la COVID-19, por lo que su rol influyó en el restablecimiento del equilibrio biopsicosocial de la población infantil(AU)
Introduction: Social pediatrics is oriented towards the comprehensive care of children. It studies the social causes that alter their health, and also the problems of this nature that affect their social environment. In the context of the current pandemic, characterized by high morbidity and mortality, there were significant psychosocial consequences. Objective: To describe the impact of social pediatrics on children and adolescents health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A review was conducted in the bibliographic databases PubMed and VHL. Google Scholar was used as a search engine. The following descriptors were used in Spanish and English: social pediatrics, COVID-19 pandemic, social isolation, psychological well-being, mental health and pediatric population. Analysis and synthesis of information: Arguments were presented from the psychosocial perspective of the pediatrician, related to the development and socio-emotional well-being of children, and the impact on them of social isolation. In addition, the impact of the pandemic on children was described, and the role played by the specialists and other professionals linked to pediatric care. Conclusions: The pandemic was characterized by affecting all spheres of the child's life. Social pediatrics was indispensable in confronting the medical-biological, psychological and social consequences caused by the scourge of COVID-19, so its role influenced the restoration of the biopsychosocial balance of the children population(AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Social Isolation/psychology , Child Health/trends , Psychological Well-BeingSubject(s)
Biomedical Research , Child Health , Child , Humans , Child Health/trends , Biomedical Research/trendsABSTRACT
Els últims trenta anys, lecografia a peu de llit, coneguda en anglès com a point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), shaestès i ha passat de ser una eina utilitzada només per a la valoració primària de pacients afectats de traumaabdominal (eco FAST) a ser emprada en múltiples situacions per diferents especialitats mèdiques 1, incloent-hi lapediatria 2. Gràcies als avenços tecnològics, ara es diposa decògrafs portàtils, alguns de la mida dun telèfon mòbil,que es poden fer servir tant a peu de llit dintensius com a urgències o en la consulta del centre datenció primària. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Child Health/trends , UltrasonographyABSTRACT
COVID-19 limitation strategies have led to widespread school closures around the world. The present study reports children's mental health and associated factors during the COVID-19 school closure in France in the spring of 2020. We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the SAPRIS project set up during the COVID-19 pandemic in France. Using multinomial logistic regression models, we estimated associations between children's mental health, children's health behaviors, schooling, and socioeconomic characteristics of the children's families. The sample consisted of 5702 children aged 8-9 years, including 50.2% girls. In multivariate logistic regression models, children's sleeping difficulties were associated with children's abnormal symptoms of both hyperactivity-inattention (adjusted Odds Ratio (aOR) 2.05; 95% Confidence Interval 1.70-2.47) and emotional symptoms (aOR 5.34; 95% CI 4.16-6.86). Factors specifically associated with abnormal hyperactivity/inattention were: male sex (aOR 2.29; 95% CI 1.90-2.76), access to specialized care prior to the pandemic and its suspension during school closure (aOR 1.51; 95% CI 1.21-1.88), abnormal emotional symptoms (aOR 4.06; 95% CI 3.11-5.29), being unschooled or schooled with assistance before lockdown (aOR 2.13; 95% CI 1.43-3.17), and tutoring with difficulties or absence of a tutor (aOR 3.25; 95% CI 2.64-3.99; aOR 2.47; 95% CI 1.48-4.11, respectively). Factors associated with children's emotional symptoms were the following: being born pre-term (aOR 1.34; 95% CI 1.03-1.73), COVID-19 cases among household members (aOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.08-2.73), abnormal symptoms of hyperactivity/inattention (aOR 4.18; 95% CI 3.27-5.34) and modest income (aOR 1.45; 95% CI 1.07-1.96; aOR 1.36; 95% CI 1.01-1.84). Multiple characteristics were associated with elevated levels of symptoms of hyperactivity-inattention and emotional symptoms in children during the period of school closure due to COVID-19. Further studies are needed to help policymakers to balance the pros and cons of closing schools, taking into consideration the educational and psychological consequences for children.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Education, Distance/trends , Mental Health/trends , Child , Child Health/trends , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Educational Status , Female , France/epidemiology , Health Behavior , Humans , Male , Pandemics/prevention & control , Physical Distancing , SARS-CoV-2/pathogenicity , Schools/trends , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
Child Health , Climate Change , Environmental Exposure , Physician's Role , Public Health/methods , Quality of Life , Air Pollutants/adverse effects , Air Pollution/prevention & control , Child Health/standards , Child Health/trends , Environmental Exposure/adverse effects , Environmental Exposure/prevention & control , Humans , Physician-Patient Relations , Social Determinants of Health , Social Responsibility , Socioeconomic FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The current burden of >5 million deaths yearly is the focus of the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) to end preventable deaths of newborns and children under 5 years old by 2030. To accelerate progression toward this goal, data are needed that accurately quantify the leading causes of death, so that interventions can target the common causes. By adding postmortem pathology and microbiology studies to other available data, the Child Health and Mortality Prevention Surveillance (CHAMPS) network provides comprehensive evaluations of conditions leading to death, in contrast to standard methods that rely on data from medical records and verbal autopsy and report only a single underlying condition. We analyzed CHAMPS data to characterize the value of considering multiple causes of death. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We examined deaths identified from December 2016 through November 2020 from 7 CHAMPS sites (in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, Sierra Leone, and South Africa), including 741 neonatal, 278 infant, and 241 child <5 years deaths for which results from Determination of Cause of Death (DeCoDe) panels were complete. DeCoDe panelists included all conditions in the causal chain according to the ICD-10 guidelines and assessed if prevention or effective management of the condition would have prevented the death. We analyzed the distribution of all conditions listed as causal, including underlying, antecedent, and immediate causes of death. Among 1,232 deaths with an underlying condition determined, we found a range of 0 to 6 (mean 1.5, IQR 0 to 2) additional conditions in the causal chain leading to death. While pathology provides very helpful clues, we cannot always be certain that conditions identified led to death or occurred in an agonal stage of death. For neonates, preterm birth complications (most commonly respiratory distress syndrome) were the most common underlying condition (n = 282, 38%); among those with preterm birth complications, 256 (91%) had additional conditions in causal chains, including 184 (65%) with a different preterm birth complication, 128 (45%) with neonatal sepsis, 69 (24%) with lower respiratory infection (LRI), 60 (21%) with meningitis, and 25 (9%) with perinatal asphyxia/hypoxia. Of the 278 infant deaths, 212 (79%) had ≥1 additional cause of death (CoD) beyond the underlying cause. The 2 most common underlying conditions in infants were malnutrition and congenital birth defects; LRI and sepsis were the most common additional conditions in causal chains, each accounting for approximately half of deaths with either underlying condition. Of the 241 child deaths, 178 (75%) had ≥1 additional condition. Among 46 child deaths with malnutrition as the underlying condition, all had ≥1 other condition in the causal chain, most commonly sepsis, followed by LRI, malaria, and diarrheal disease. Including all positions in the causal chain for neonatal deaths resulted in 19-fold and 11-fold increases in attributable roles for meningitis and LRI, respectively. For infant deaths, the proportion caused by meningitis and sepsis increased by 16-fold and 11-fold, respectively; for child deaths, sepsis and LRI are increased 12-fold and 10-fold, respectively. While comprehensive CoD determinations were done for a substantial number of deaths, there is potential for bias regarding which deaths in surveillance areas underwent minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS), potentially reducing representativeness of findings. CONCLUSIONS: Including conditions that appear anywhere in the causal chain, rather than considering underlying condition alone, markedly changed the proportion of deaths attributed to various diagnoses, especially LRI, sepsis, and meningitis. While CHAMPS methods cannot determine when 2 conditions cause death independently or may be synergistic, our findings suggest that considering the chain of events leading to death can better guide research and prevention priorities aimed at reducing child deaths.
Subject(s)
Cause of Death/trends , Child Health/trends , Child Mortality/trends , Infant Health/trends , Infant Mortality/trends , Africa , Age Factors , Asia , Autopsy , Child, Preschool , Female , Global Burden of Disease , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Population Surveillance , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Entrevista al Secretario Nacional de Niñez, Adolescencia y Familia del Ministerio de Desarrollo Social de la Nación, abogado especialista en infancia, donde analiza el estado de situación de los principales problemas de las infancias en Argentina, especialmente luego de la pandemia de Covid-19.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Public Policy/trends , Child , Child Advocacy , Child Development , Child, Institutionalized , Child Health/trends , COVID-19ABSTRACT
Introducción. Los jóvenes no fueron muy afectados desde el punto de vista infeccioso por la pandemia de COVID-19. Sin embargo, las medidas de aislamiento social modificaron de manera profunda su estilo de vida, y se cree que esto los afecta psicológicamente. El objetivo fue evaluar el impacto del aislamiento por COVID-19en la salud emocional de jóvenes en escolaridad primaria o secundaria.Población y métodos. Participaron del estudio padres de jóvenes de San Carlos de Bariloche. Se evaluó la percepción del adulto sobre el impacto emocional y de comportamiento del aislamiento sobre el joven, cambio de hábitos de sueño, uso de pantallas, actividades deportivas y alimentación y de asistencia a consulta médica.Resultados. Se incluyeron 267 padres. El 96,3 % observó cambios emocionales y de comportamiento. Los más frecuentes fueron que estaban más aburridos (el 76,8 %), irritables (el 59,2 %), desganados (el 56,9 %) y enojados (el 54,7 %). Se observó que se levantaban y acostaban más tarde y dormían 30 minutos más. Además, el uso de pantallas por esparcimiento aumentó 3 horas durante los días hábiles. El tiempo dedicado a la actividad física no varió, pero sí cambió el tipo de actividades: la natación y los deportes de equipo fueron reemplazados por ciclismo, caminatas y esquí.Conclusiones. El aislamiento por COVID-19impactó sobre la salud emocional y los hábitos de los jóvenes. El aburrimiento, la irritabilidad y el desgano estuvieron más presentes durante el aislamiento. La posibilidad de realizar actividades al aire libre permitió que continuaran practicando deportes.
Introduction. From an infectious perspective, children and adolescents were not highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, social isolation measures have deeply changed their lifestyle, which is believed to have a psychological impact on them. The objective was to assess the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the emotional health of children and adolescents attending primary or secondary school.Population and methods. Parents of children and adolescents from San Carlos de Bariloche participated in the study. Adults' perception of the emotional and behavioral impact of lockdown on children and adolescents, changes in sleeping habits, screen use, sports-related activities, eating, and medical consultations, was assessed.Results. A total of 267 parents were included. Of them, 96.3 % noticed emotional and behavioral changes. The most common ones were that their children were more bored (76.8 %), more irritable (59.2 %), more reluctant (56.9 %), and angrier (54.7 %). It was observed that they woke up and went to bed later, and slept 30 minutes more. Moreover, leisure screen use increased by 3 hours on weekdays. Time dedicated to physical activities did not change, but the type of activities did: swimming and team sports were replaced by biking, walking, and skiing.Conclusions. COVID-19 lockdown affected the emotional health and habits of children and adolescents. Boredom, irritability, and reluctance were more present during lockdown. The possibility of doing outdoor physical activities allowed them to keep practicing sports
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Social Isolation/psychology , Education, Distance , COVID-19/prevention & control , Parents , Argentina/epidemiology , Child Behavior/psychology , Mental Health/trends , Child Health/trends , Epidemiology, Descriptive , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies , Health Surveys , Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Adolescent Health/trends , Pandemics , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: From an infectious perspective, children and adolescents were not highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. However, social isolation measures have deeply changed their lifestyle, which is believed to have a psychological impact on them. The objective was to assess the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on the emotional health of children and adolescents attending primary or secondary school. POPULATION AND METHODS: Parents of children and adolescents from San Carlos de Bariloche participated in the study. Adults' perception of the emotional and behavioral impact of lockdown on children and adolescents, changes in sleeping habits, screen use, sports-related activities, eating, and medical consultations, was assessed. RESULTS: A total of 267 parents were included. Of them, 96.3 % noticed emotional and behavioral changes. The most common ones were that their children were more bored (76.8 %), more irritable (59.2 %), more reluctant (56.9 %), and angrier (54.7 %). It was observed that they woke up and went to bed later, and slept 30 minutes more. Moreover, leisure screen use increased by 3 hours on weekdays. Time dedicated to physical activities did not change, but the type of activities did: swimming and team sports were replaced by biking, walking, and skiing. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 lockdown affected the emotional health and habits of children and adolescents. Boredom, irritability, and reluctance were more present during lockdown. The possibility of doing outdoor physical activities allowed them to keep practicing sports.
Introducción. Los jóvenes no fueron muy afectados desde el punto de vista infeccioso por la pandemia de COVID-19. Sin embargo, las medidas de aislamiento social modificaron de manera profunda su estilo de vida, y se cree que esto los afecta psicológicamente. El objetivo fue evaluar el impacto del aislamiento por COVID-19 en la salud emocional de jóvenes en escolaridad primaria o secundaria. Población y métodos. Participaron del estudio padres de jóvenes de San Carlos de Bariloche. Se evaluó la percepción del adulto sobre el impacto emocional y de comportamiento del aislamiento sobre el joven, cambio de hábitos de sueño, uso de pantallas, actividades deportivas y alimentación y de asistencia a consulta médica. Resultados. Se incluyeron 267 padres. El 96,3 % observó cambios emocionales y de comportamiento. Los más frecuentes fueron que estaban más aburridos (el 76,8 %), irritables (el 59,2 %), desganados (el 56,9 %) y enojados (el 54,7 %). Se observó que se levantaban y acostaban más tarde y dormían 30 minutos más. Además, el uso de pantallas por esparcimiento aumentó 3 horas durante los días hábiles. El tiempo dedicado a la actividad física no varió, pero sí cambió el tipo de actividades: la natación y los deportes de equipo fueron reemplazados por ciclismo, caminatas y esquí. Conclusiones. El aislamiento por COVID-19 impactó sobre la salud emocional y los hábitos de los jóvenes. El aburrimiento, la irritabilidad y el desgano estuvieron más presentes durante el aislamiento. La posibilidad de realizar actividades al aire libre permitió que continuaran practicando deportes.