ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in treatment and outcomes of esophagogastric cancer surgery after introduction of the DUCA. In addition, the presence of risk-averse behavior was assessed. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Clinical auditing is seen as an important quality improvement tool; however, its long-term efficacy remains largely unknown. In addition, critics claim that enhancements result from risk-averse behavior rather than positive effects of auditing. METHODS: DUCA data were used from registration start (1-1-2011) until 31-12-2018. Trends in patient, tumor, hospital and treatment characteristics were univariably assessed. Trends in short-term outcomes were investigated using multilevel multivariable logistic regression. Presence of risk aversion was described by the corrected proportion of patients undergoing surgery, using data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. To evaluate the impact of centralization on time trends identified, the association between hospital volume and outcomes was investigated. RESULTS: This study included 6172 patients with esophageal and 3,690 with gastric cancer who underwent surgery. Pathological outcomes (lymph node yield, radicality) improved and futile surgery decreased over the years. In-hospital/30-day mortality decreased for esophagectomy (4.2% to 2.5%) and for gastrectomy (7.1% to 4.3%). Reinterventions, (minor) complications and readmissions increased. Risk aversion appeared absent. Between 2011-2018, annual median hospital volumes increased from 38 to 53 for esophagectomy and from 14 to 29 for gastrectomy. Higher hospital volumes were associated with several improved outcomes measures. CONCLUSIONS: During 8âyears of auditing, outcomes improved, with no signs of risk-averse behavior. These improvements occurred in parallel with centralization. Feedback on postoperative complications remains the focus of the DUCA.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/methods , Gastrectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Registries , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitals, High-Volume/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
The globally recommended public health policy for cervical screening is primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening with cytology triaging of positives. To ensure optimal quality of laboratory services we have conducted regular audits of cervical smears taken before cervical cancer or cancer in situ (CIN3+) within an HPV-based screening program. The central cervical screening laboratory of Stockholm, Sweden, identified cases of CIN3+ who had had a previous cervical screening test up to 3 years before and randomly selected 300 cervical liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples for auditing. HPV testing with Roche Cobas was performed either at screening or with biobanked samples. HPV negative samples and subsequent biopsies were retrieved and tested with modified general primer HPV PCR and, if still HPV-negative, the LBCs and biopsies were whole genome sequenced. The Cobas 4800 detected HPV in 1020/1052 (97.0%) LBC samples taken before CIN3+. Further analyses found HPV in 28 samples, with nine of those containing HPV types not targeted by the Cobas 4800 test. There were 4 specimens (4/1052, 0.4%) where no HPV was detected. By comparison, the proportion of CIN3+ cases that were positive in a previous cytology were 91.6%. We find that the routine HPV screening test had a sensitivity in the real-life screening program of 97.0%. Regular laboratory audits of cervical samples taken before CIN3+ can be readily performed within a real-life screening program and provide assurance that the laboratory of the real-life program has the expected performance.
Subject(s)
Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Clinical Laboratory Services/statistics & numerical data , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cervix Uteri/virology , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Laboratory Services/organization & administration , False Negative Reactions , Female , Humans , Mass Screening/methods , Mass Screening/standards , Middle Aged , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Sweden , Triage/methods , Triage/standards , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology , Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/virology , Vaginal Smears/standards , Vaginal Smears/statistics & numerical data , Young AdultABSTRACT
AIMS: We hypothesized that a decline in admissions with heart failure during COVID-19 pandemic would lead to a reciprocal rise in mortality for patients with heart failure in the community. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used National Heart Failure Audit data to identify 36 974 adults who had a hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of heart failure between February and May in either 2018, 2019, or 2020. Hospital admissions for heart failure in 2018/19 averaged 160/day but were much lower in 2020, reaching a nadir of 64/day on 27 March 2020 [incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.42]. The proportion discharged on guideline-recommended pharmacotherapies was similar in 2018/19 compared to the same period in 2020. Between 1 February-2020 and 31 May 2020, there was a 29% decrease in hospital deaths related to heart failure (IRR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.67-0.75; estimated decline of 448 deaths), a 31% increase in heart failure deaths at home (IRR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.24-1.39; estimated excess 539), and a 28% increase in heart failure deaths in care homes and hospices (IRR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.18-1.40; estimated excess 189). All-cause, inpatient death was similar in the COVID-19 and pre-COVID-19 periods [odds ratio (OR): 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94-1.10]. After hospital discharge, 30-day mortality was higher in 2020 compared to 2018/19 (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.38-1.78). CONCLUSION: Compared with the rolling daily average in 2018/19, there was a substantial decline in admissions for heart failure but an increase in deaths from heart failure in the community. Despite similar rates of prescription of guideline-recommended therapy, mortality 30 days from discharge was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic period.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Communicable Disease Control , Heart Failure , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and over , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Cause of Death , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/organization & administration , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Failure/mortality , Heart Failure/therapy , Humans , Male , Mortality , Quality of Health Care , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index , State Medicine/standards , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of 2 different continuous quality improvement interventions in an integrated community urology practice. We specifically assessed the impact of audited physician feedback on improving physicians' adoption of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer (CaP) and adherence to a prostate biopsy time-out intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The electronic medical records of Genesis Healthcare Partners were analyzed between August 24, 2011 and September 30, 2020 to evaluate the performance of 2 quality interventions: audited physician feedback to improve active surveillance adoption in low-risk CaP patients, and audited physician feedback to promote adherence to an electronic medical records embedded prostate biopsy time-out template. Physician and Genesis Healthcare Partners group adherence to each quality initiative was compared before and after each intervention type using ANOVA testing. RESULTS: For active surveillance, we consistently saw an increase in active surveillance adoption for low risk CaP patients in association with continuous audited feedback (P < .001). Adherence to the prostate biopsy time-out template improved when audited feedback was provided (P < .001). CONCLUSION: The implementation of clinical guidelines into routine clinical practice remains challenging and poses an obstacle to the improvement of United States healthcare quality. Continuous quality improvement should be a dynamic process, and in our experience, audited feedback coupled with education is most effective.
Subject(s)
Biopsy , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Prostatic Neoplasms , Quality Improvement/organization & administration , Urology , Watchful Waiting , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy/standards , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Community Health Services/standards , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Electronic Health Records/statistics & numerical data , Guideline Adherence , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Assessment , United States/epidemiology , Urology/methods , Urology/organization & administration , Urology/standards , Watchful Waiting/methods , Watchful Waiting/standardsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted healthcare systems globally, little is known about the trauma patterns during a national lockdown. The aim of this study is to delineate the trauma patterns and outcomes at Aintree University Teaching Hospital level 1 Major Trauma Centre (MTC) during the COVID-19 lockdown imposed by the U.K. government. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study data from the Merseyside and Cheshire Trauma Audit and Research Network database were analysed. The 7-week 'lockdown period' was compared to a 7-week period prior to the lockdown and also to an equivalent 7-week period corresponding to the previous year. RESULTS: A total of 488 patients were included in the study. Overall, there was 37.6% and 30.0% reduction in the number of traumatic injuries during lockdown. Road traffic collisions (RTC) reduced by 42.6% and 46.6%. RTC involving a car significantly reduced during lockdown, conversely, bike-related RTC significantly increased. No significant changes were noted in deliberate self-harm, trauma severity and crude mortality during lockdown. There was 1 mortality from COVID-19 infection in the lockdown cohort. CONCLUSION: Trauma continues during lockdown, our MTC has continued to provide a full service during lockdown. However, trauma patterns have changed and departments should adapt to balance these alongside the COVID-19 pandemic. As the U.K. starts its cautious transition out of lockdown, trauma services are required to be flexible during changes in national social restrictions and changing trauma patterns. COVID-19 and lockdown state were found to have no significant impact on survival outcomes for trauma.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries , Accidents, Traffic/statistics & numerical data , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Clinical Audit/methods , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/organization & administration , Male , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Severity Indices , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/etiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapySubject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Dietetics/statistics & numerical data , Nutritionists/statistics & numerical data , Professional Practice/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Advisory Committees , Clinical Competence/standards , Credentialing , Dietetics/standards , Female , Humans , Male , Nutritionists/standards , Professional Practice/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Studies on medication-related problems (MRPs) among pregnant women are scarce, despite the potential consequences for both mother and child. This study aimed to describe the prevalence, clinical significance, and risk factors for MRPs among hospitalized pregnant or postpartum women at Jimma University Medical Centre (JUMC) in Ethiopia. METHODS: A prospective follow-up and clinical audit of 1117 hospitalized pregnant or postpartum women in the maternity and gynaecology wards at JUMC was carried out between February and June 2017. Patients were followed throughout their stay in the hospital to assess the presence and development of MRPs. Pre-tested data extraction form and an interview-guided structured questionnaire were used to collect data. Descriptive statistics were used to describe MRPs. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with MRPs. RESULTS: One or more MRPs occurred among 323 (28.9%) study participants, mostly in relation to lack of iron supplementation. A total of 278 (70.6%) of all MRPs were considered to be of moderate to high clinical significance. When excluding MRPs due to iron from the analysis, chronic disease (adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.02, 3.58), medication use prior to admission (adjusted OR 2.38; 95% CI 1.24, 4.56), nulliparity (adjusted OR 1.99; 95% CI 1.22, 3.24) and multiparity (adjusted OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.17, 3.12) were significantly associated with experiencing an MRP. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 3 out of 10 hospitalized pregnant women at JUMC had one or more MRPs. The need for additional iron therapy was by far the most common type of MRP. Improved adherence to guidelines on iron supplementation are required. Multidisciplinary approaches including physicians, nurses, anesthesia professionals and clinical pharmacists in the maternity and gynaecology wards could possibly prevent MRPs and promote patient safety for women and children.
Subject(s)
Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Patient Safety , Pregnancy Complications/epidemiology , Adult , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Dietary Supplements , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/blood , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/prevention & control , Ethiopia/epidemiology , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Iron/administration & dosage , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications/blood , Pregnancy Complications/chemically induced , Pregnancy Complications/prevention & control , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Diabetes is a major cause of CKD and of mortality in patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT). Auditing the care of patients with diabetes on RRT against published guidelines relies on robust data collection. OBJECTIVE: This article assesses the completeness of data items collected by the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) that are required to audit the care of patients with diabetes on RRT. METHODS: The UKRR receives data on all patients receiving RRT in the UK. Patients with diabetes, diabetes type, and method of renal diagnosis were identified from primary renal disease (PRD) codes and comorbidity data for patients commencing RRT at one of the 57 renal centres in England and Wales between 2010 and 2016. The completeness of demographic and clinical data (blood pressure, cholesterol, glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], and smoking status) was assessed for the first year of RRT. RESULTS: Ninety-three per cent of all patients on RRT irrespective of diagnosis had a PRD code, but only 28/57 renal centres had comorbidity data completeness ≥70%; 34.9% of patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) had type 1 diabetes, but this varied between centres (9.2-100%). Overall, 4.2% of DN diagnoses were by biopsy. Data completeness in the first year of RRT for cardiovascular risk factors ranged between 50.0 and 80.0%, with HbA1c data completeness being 63.0%. Of 57 centres, 20 had HbA1c data for ≥70% of patients in the first year of RRT. CONCLUSIONS: There is persistent variation between renal centres in the completeness of data collected on patients with diabetes on RRT, impacting on the ability to undertake robust audit. Data linkages and expanded data permissions could see registry data play a key role in ongoing audit and research into patients with diabetes and CKD, provided adequate data can be collected.
Subject(s)
Diabetic Nephropathies/therapy , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Comorbidity , Data Collection , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Diabetic Nephropathies/epidemiology , England/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Wales/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Studies which report outcomes of continuing medical education (CME) interventions for rural general practitioners (GPs) are limited. This mixed methods study recruited GPs from four CME small group learning (SGL) tutor groups based in different rural locations in the Republic of Ireland. A two-hour teaching module on deprescribing in older patients was devised and implemented. Assessment of educational outcomes was via questionnaires, prescribing audits and qualitative focus groups. All GPs (n = 43) in these CME-SGL groups agreed to participate, 27 of whom (63%) self-identified as being in rural practice. Rural GPs were more likely to be male (56%), in practice for longer (19 years), and attending CME for longer (13 years). The questionnaires indicated learning outcomes were achieved knowledge increased immediately after the education, and was maintained 6 months later. Twenty-four GPs completed audits involving 191 patients. Of these, 152 (79.6%) were de-prescribed medication. In the qualitative focus groups, GPs reported sharing experiences with their peers during CME-SGL helped them to improve patient care and ensured that clinical practice is more consistent across the group. For rural GPs, CME-SGL involving discussion of cases and the practical implementation of guidelines, associated with audit, can lead to changes in patient care.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical, Continuing/methods , General Practitioners/education , Aged , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Deprescriptions , Female , Focus Groups , General Practitioners/psychology , Humans , Inappropriate Prescribing/prevention & control , Ireland , Learning , Male , Rural Population , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
Data from 110 primary healthcare clinics participating in two or more continuous quality improvement (CQI) cycles in preventive care, which included syphilis testing performance (STP) for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged between 15 and 54 years, were used to examine whether the number of audit cycles including syphilis testing was associated over time with STP improvement at clinic level in this specific measure of public health importance. The number of cycles per clinic ranged from two to nine (mode 3). As shown by medical record audit at entry to CQI, only 42 (38%) clinics had tested or approached 50% or more of their eligible clients for syphilis in the prior 24 months. Using mixed effects logistic regression, it was found that the odds of a clinic's STP relative to its first cycle increased only modestly. Counterintuitively, clinics undertaking the most preventive health CQI cycles tended to have the lowest STP throughout. Participation in a general preventive care CQI tool was insufficient to achieve and sustain high rates of STP for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people required for public health benefit. Improving STP requires dedicated effort and greater understanding of barriers to effective CQI within and beyond clinic control.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Quality Improvement/statistics & numerical data , Syphilis/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Preventive Health Services , Primary Health Care , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore the prevalence of congenital HIV infection of neonates at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) between 2015 and 2017, as well as compare the HIV PCR positive and HIV PCR negative neonates. RESULTS: A total number of 1443 HIV exposed neonates was examined for the study period out of a total of 5029 admissions (HIV exposure 28.6%) The study found that the rate of HIV transmission at birth was 2.52%. The majority of infants had low birth weight and were also born prematurely. These results show that, despite the introduction of the extended mother to child transmission programme, HIV transmission is high.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , HIV Infections/transmission , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/statistics & numerical data , Tertiary Care Centers , Clinical Audit/methods , Clinical Audit/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , HIV Infections/epidemiology , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/prevention & control , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/prevention & control , Male , Neonatal Screening/methods , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , South Africa/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The completeness and accuracy of data contained within clinical databases and registries is critical to the reliability of reports emanating from these platforms. Therefore, vigorous data verification processes are a core competency of any mature database or registry. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database (STS CHSD) has conducted audits of participant data for just over ten years. This report documents the validity of data elements within the STS CHSD. METHODS: We review the various elements of a robust audit process, detail the STS CHSD audit methodology, and report completeness and agreement rates for all adjudicated fields in the most recently completed audit. RESULTS: The rate of completeness for general data elements was 97.6% and the rate of agreement was 97.4%. The rate of completeness for variables in the mortality review was 100% and the rate of agreement was 99.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The STS CHSD audit is a highly structured and reproducible process. The most recently completed audit documents a very high level of completeness and accuracy of data variables, particularly those most germane to outcomes measurement.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Registries , Societies, Medical , Thoracic Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual , Humans , Surgeons/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A quality improvement programme addressing prescribing practice for acutely disturbed behaviour was initiated by the Prescribing Observatory for Mental Health. METHOD: This study analysed data from a baseline clinical audit conducted in inpatient mental health services in member trusts. RESULTS: Fifty-eight mental health services submitted data on 2172 episodes of acutely disturbed behaviour. A benzodiazepine alone was administered in 60% of the 1091 episodes where oral medication only was used and in 39% of the 1081 episodes where parenteral medication (rapid tranquillisation) was used. Haloperidol was combined with lorazepam in 22% of rapid tranquillisation episodes and with promethazine in 3%. Physical violence towards others was strongly associated with receiving rapid tranquillisation in men (odds ratio 1.74, 1.25-2.44; p<0.001) as was actual or attempted self-harm in women (odds ratio 1.87, 1.19-2.94; p=0.007). Where physical violence towards others was exhibited, a benzodiazepine and antipsychotic was more likely to be prescribed than a benzodiazepine alone (odds ratio 1.39, 1.00-1.92; p=0.05). The data suggested that 25% of patients were at least 'extremely or continuously active' in the hour after rapid tranquillisation was administered. CONCLUSION: The current management of acutely disturbed behaviour with parenteral medication may fail to achieve a calming effect in up to a quarter of episodes. The most common rapid tranquillisation combination used was lorazepam and haloperidol, for which the randomised controlled trial evidence is very limited. Rapid tranquillisation prescribing practice was not wholly consistent with the relevant National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline, which recommends intramuscular lorazepam on its own or intramuscular haloperidol combined with intramuscular promethazine. Clinical factors prompting the use of rapid tranquillisation rather than oral medication may differ between the genders.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Drug Utilization/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Problem Behavior , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A thorough evaluation of the adequacy of clinical practice in a designated health care setting and temporal context is key for clinical care improvement. This study aimed to perform a clinical audit of primary care to evaluate clinical care delivered to patients with COPD in routine clinical practice. METHODS: The Community Assessment of COPD Health Care (COACH) study was an observational, multicenter, nationwide, non-interventional, retrospective, clinical audit of randomly selected primary care centers in Spain. Two different databases were built: the resources and organization database and the clinical database. From January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2016 consecutive clinical cases of COPD in each participating primary care center (PCC) were audited. For descriptive purposes, we collected data regarding the age at diagnosis of COPD and the age at audit, gender, the setting of the PCC (rural/urban), and comorbidities for each patient. Two guidelines widely and uniformly used in Spain were carefully reviewed to establish a benchmark of adequacy for the audited cases. Clinical performance was analyzed at the patient, center, and regional levels. The degree of adequacy was categorized as excellent (> 80%), good (60-80%), adequate (40-59%), inadequate (20-39%), and highly inadequate (< 20%). RESULTS: During the study 4307 cases from 63 primary care centers in 6 regions of the country were audited. Most evaluated parameters were judged to fall in the inadequate performance category. A correct diagnosis based on previous exposure plus spirometric obstruction was made in an average of 17.6% of cases, ranging from 9.8 to 23.3% depending on the region. During the audited visit, only 67 (1.6%) patients had current post-bronchodilator obstructive spirometry; 184 (4.3%) patients had current post-bronchodilator obstructive spirometry during either the audited or initial diagnostic visit. Evaluation of dyspnea was performed in 11.1% of cases. Regarding treatment, 33.6% received no maintenance inhaled therapies (ranging from 31.3% in GOLD A to 7.0% in GOLD D). The two most frequently registered items were exacerbations in the previous year (81.4%) and influenza vaccination (87.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this audit revealed a large variability in clinical performance across centers, which was not fully attributable to the severity of the disease.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/methods , Primary Health Care/methods , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Female , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multicenter Studies as Topic , Observational Studies as Topic , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Spain , Spirometry/methodsABSTRACT
Background: According to Dutch guidelines, locally excised, low-risk, pT1 or ypT0-1 rectal cancer should not necessarily be followed by completion total mesorectal excision (cTME) in contrast to rectal cancers with higher T stages or unfavorable features. This study evaluated cTME after local excision at a national level with possible determinants for decision-making. Methods: All patients in the Dutch Colorectal Audit (DCRA) who underwent local excision of rectal cancer between 2012 and 2015 were included. Guideline adherence for performing cTME was determined with univariate and multivariate analyses to identify factors related to noncompliance. Results: According to the guidelines, of 530 included patients, cTME was indicated in 283 (53%), and among those, was performed in 82 (29%). Guideline adherence for performing cTME improved significantly (P<.001), from 10% in 2012 to 44% in 2015. Lower Charlson comorbidity index in patients with high-risk pT1 rectal cancer and younger patients (aged 61-70 years vs ≥80 years) with pT≥2 rectal cancer were associated with increased performance of cTME (odds ratio [OR], 13.50; 95% CI, 1.39-131.32, and OR, 6.25; 95% CI, 1.83-21.31, respectively). Conclusions: In this population-based study from the Netherlands, only a minority of patients underwent cTME after local excision of rectal cancer with pathologic features indicating the need for further treatment according to the guidelines. Although the percentage of patients undergoing cTME increased over time, the study indicated a tendency toward rectal-preserving treatment with potential oncologic risks.
Subject(s)
Digestive System Surgical Procedures/standards , Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Organ Sparing Treatments/standards , Rectal Neoplasms/therapy , Rectum/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Neoadjuvant Therapy/standards , Neoadjuvant Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Staging , Netherlands/epidemiology , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Organ Sparing Treatments/statistics & numerical data , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Rectum/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Many people with musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders wait several months or years for Consultant Doctor appointments, despite often not requiring medical or surgical interventions. To allow earlier patient access to orthopaedic and rheumatology services in Ireland, Advanced Practice Physiotherapists (APPs) were introduced at 16 major acute hospitals. This study performed the first national evaluation of APP triage services. METHOD: Throughout 2014, APPs (n = 22) entered clinical data on a national database. Analysis of these data using descriptive statistics determined patient wait times, Consultant Doctor involvement in clinical decisions, and patient clinical outcomes. Chi square tests were used to compare patient clinical outcomes across orthopaedic and rheumatology clinics. A pilot study at one site identified re-referral rates to orthopaedic/rheumatology services of patients managed by the APPs. RESULTS: In one year, 13,981 new patients accessed specialist orthopaedic and rheumatology consultations via the APP. Median wait time for an appointment was 5.6 months. Patients most commonly presented with knee (23%), lower back (22%) and shoulder (15%) disorders. APPs made autonomous clinical decisions regarding patient management at 77% of appointments, and managed patient care pathways without onward referral to Consultant Doctors in more than 80% of cases. Other onward clinical pathways recommended by APPs were: physiotherapy referrals (42%); clinical investigations (29%); injections administered (4%); and surgical listing (2%). Of those managed by the APP, the pilot study identified that only 6.5% of patients were re-referred within one year. CONCLUSION: This national evaluation of APP services demonstrated that the majority of patients assessed by an APP did not require onward referral for a Consultant Doctor appointment. Therefore, patients gained earlier access to orthopaedic and rheumatology consultations in secondary care, with most patients conservatively managed.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Data Analysis , Orthopedics/statistics & numerical data , Physical Therapy Modalities/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatology/statistics & numerical data , Triage/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Audit/trends , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Ireland/epidemiology , Orthopedics/trends , Physical Therapy Modalities/trends , Pilot Projects , Rheumatology/trends , Triage/trends , Waiting ListsABSTRACT
Background: It is unclear whether emergency weekend colon and rectal cancer surgery are associated with worse outcomes (ie, weekend effect) because previous studies mostly used administrative data, which may insufficiently adjust for case-mix. Materials and Methods: Prospectively collected data from the 2012-2015 Dutch ColoRectal Audit (n=5,224) was used to examine differences in 30-day mortality and severe complication and failure-to-rescue rates for emergency weekend (Saturday and Sunday) versus Monday surgery, stratified for colon and rectal cancer. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, Charlson comorbidity index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification score, tumor stage, presence of metastasis, preoperative complication, additional resection for metastasis or locally advanced tumor, location primary colon tumor, type of rectal surgery (lower anterior resection or abdominal perineal resection), and type of neoadjuvant therapy (short-course radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy). Results: A total of 5,052 patients undergoing colon cancer surgery and 172 undergoing rectal cancer surgery were included. Patients undergoing colon or rectal cancer surgery during weekends had significantly more preoperative tumor complications compared with those undergoing surgery on a weekday. Additionally, differences in year of surgery and location of primary tumor were found for colon cancer surgery. Emergency colon cancer surgery during the weekend was associated with increased 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; 95% CI, 1.10-2.50) and severe complications (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.03-1.63) compared with surgery on Monday. Estimates for emergency weekend rectal cancer surgery were similar but not statistically significant, likely explained by small numbers. Conclusions: Weekend emergency colon cancer surgery was associated with higher mortality and severe complication rates. More research is needed to understand which factors explain and contribute to these differences.
Subject(s)
Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Emergencies/epidemiology , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Health Care , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Objective: To assess adherence to current national guidelines for appropriate albumin use at an academic medical center. Methods: This retrospective chart review of 150 randomly selected patients prescribed and administered at least one dose of albumin was conducted in an urban academic medical center to evaluate the adherence of albumin orders to current national guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of discharged patients at least 18-years-old admitted to the intensive care unit or medical/surgical unit from September 1, 2015 to August 31, 2016. The primary outcome was the number of patients who inappropriately received albumin based on national guidelines and FDA approved indications. Secondary outcomes included the number of patients who received the incorrect concentration or dose of albumin based on indication, as well as the cost associated with inappropriate albumin prescribing. Descriptive statistics were used to report outcomes. Results: There were 68 instances (45%) where albumin was prescribed inappropriately according to guideline recommendations. Of the 82 instances where albumin was used appropriately, 18 patients received an incorrect dose (22%), and 6 received the inappropriate concentration of albumin (7%). The cost for the 150 patients included in the study associated with inappropriate albumin prescribing was approximately $13,000. Conclusions: This study identified areas for pharmacist intervention to ensure appropriate albumin utilization, as well as proper dosing for the most frequently incorrectly dosed indications, including hepato-renal syndrome, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and paracentesis. This study also identified an unexpected indication with significant inappropriate albumin utilization, perioperative hypotension, which is an area for further intervention to monitor and decrease use
No disponible
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Hypovolemia/drug therapy , Albumins/administration & dosage , Pharmaceutical Services/methods , Medication Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Critical Care/methods , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Audit/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: The development of a new cohort of procedures suitable for Ambulatory Surgery has been recently mooted by the International Association of Ambulatory Surgery.This paper describes a ten year audit of performance of such operations in England, calculating rates for admission, treatment and discharge over the same calendar day. Methods: Data were extrapolated from NHS Digital information for the years 2006-7 to 2016-17, by subtracting emergency operations from the total number of finished consultant episodes, and then calculating the ambulatory surgery rate. Results: There has been a consistent increase in the rates of ambulatory surgery for the periods evaluated. Procedures can be divided into "mature", "rapidly rising" and "low threshold" categories, dependent upon their relative rates. Conclusion: Retrospective audit of ambulatory surgery performance allows assessment of national status to facilitate further development of the speciality
No disponible