Characteristics of Brazilian clinical studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov between 2010 and 2020.

AIM: Evidence-based medicine uses high-quality methods, such as randomization and blinding prcedures, to support and inform clinical practice. The investigation of trials registered in clinical research databases may help understand the main characteristics of studies conducted in countries, such as Brazil. This study aimed to investigate the characteristics of Brazilian clinical trials registered in ClinicalTrials.gov in the last decade. METHODS: Cross-sectional study performed in ClinicalTrials.gov database with clinical studies registered in Brazil between 2010 and 2020. A search was conducted in the database considering this period using filters for country (Brazil), start date (01 January 2010) and end date (date of the search: 07 May 2020). Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the studies. All analyses were conducted on Stata 14.2. RESULTS: In total, 5368 studies were retrieved, which were mostly randomized (93.2%), blinded (63.2%), Phase III (48.7%) interventional studies (89.9%) with small sample sizes (57.2%) conducted with adults (93.0%) using drugs (42.7%) with a treatment purpose (77.3%), with funding from institutions other than the industry, the NIH, and the US Federal (71.3%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Brazilian clinical studies used blinding and randomization procedures in the last 10 years. However, the predominance of trials with small sample sizes and with a focus on adult patients indicate the need of larger studies conducted with the pediatric population.

Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)-associated cardiotoxicity: Pooled analysis in advanced HER2-positive breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: T-DM1 has been approved for the treatment of HER2+ breast cancer. Cardiac dysfunction is a side effect of trastuzumab, a component of T-DM1. However, little is known about T-DM1-associated cardiotoxicity. METHODS: We have conducted a pooled analysis of T-DM1 trials in advanced HER2+ breast cancer cases to understand the incidence, clinical presentation as well as to establish possible risk factors for T-DM1-associated cardiotoxicity. The primary endpoint was the incidence of cardiac events (CEs). CEs were categorized as follows: (1) congestive heart failure (CHF) or grade 3/4 LVEF drop; (2) cardiac ischemia, (3) cardiac arrhythmia, (4) grade 1/2 LVEF drop. Secondary endpoints included CE recovery rate and impact of CEs on treatment discontinuation. Logistic regression was used to assess possible risk factors for CEs. RESULTS: Individual patient-level data from 1961 patients exposed to T-DM1 in seven trials were pooled. Of these, 1544 received T-DM1 and 417 T-DM1 + pertuzumab. CHF/LVEF drop grade 3/4 was reported in 0.71%, cardiac ischemia in 0.1%, cardiac arrhythmia in 0.71% and grade 1/2 LVEF drop in 2.04%. The total CE rate was 3.37% (95% confidence interval (CI), 2.6%-4.3%). Multivariate analysis showed patient's age ≥65 (OR 3.0; 95% CI, 1.77-5.14; P-value <0.001) and baseline LVEF<55% (OR 2.62; 95% CI, 1.29-5.32; P-value 0.008) as risk factors. CEs resolved in most (79%) patients after treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The incidence of CEs in patients receiving T-DM1 was low. Older patients receiving T-DM1 should be carefully followed for cardiac safety during treatment.

Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 (PCSK9) Inhibitors and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis With Over 96,000 Patient-Years.

OBJECTIVE: Like mutations with loss of function in the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) gene, inhibitors of PCSK9 (PCSK9i) may potentially favor the manifestation of diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A meta-analysis of phase 2/3 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessed PCSK9i versus placebo in the primary hypercholesterolemia setting. Statins and ezetimibe were used in 98.4% of these studies and balanced between PCSK9i and placebo. We calculated relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs using random- and fixed-effect models. RESULTS: We included 68,123 participants (20 RCTs) with median follow-up of 78 weeks. PCSK9i increased fasting blood glucose (weighted mean difference 1.88 mg/dL [95% CI 0.91-2.68]; I2 = 0%; P < 0.001) and HbA1c (0.032% [0.011-0.050]; I2 = 15.5%; P < 0.001) when compared with placebo. This effect was not sufficient to increase incidence of diabetes (RR 1.04 [0.96-1.13]; I2 = 0%; P = 0.427). Exploratory meta-regression analyses indicated an association between the increased risk of diabetes and the potency (P = 0.029) and duration (P = 0.026) of PCSK9i treatment. CONCLUSIONS: In the short term, PCSK9i therapy favors a small but significant increase in plasma glycemia and HbA1c.

[The use of placebos in phase III clinical trials in Brazil]. / El uso de placebo en ensayos clínicos de fase III en Brasil.

In 2008, Brazil's Federal Council of Medicine [Conselho Federal de Medicina] (CFM)--regulatory and supervisory agency on the ethical practice of medicine--banned the participation of Brazilian doctors in studies using placebos for diseases with efficient and effective treatment. This position differs with the Helsinki Declaration, which allows the use of placebos in methodologically justified conditions. To ascertain whether the CMF's ethical regulation modified the use of placebos in phase III clinical trials in Brazil, characteristics of the records in ClinicalTrials.gov were researched in the periods from 2003 to 2007 and from 2009 to 2013. The conclusions reached were: a) the regulations issued by the CFM in 2008 were ineffective and the position adopted by the Helsinki Declaration prevails; b) there was significant sponsorship by the multinational pharmaceutical industry of trials with placebos; c) the research was predominantly on new drugs for chronic diseases, with little study done of the neglected diseases which are of great importance to Brazil.

Sample Size Calculation in Oncology Trials: Quality of Reporting and Implications for Clinical Cancer Research.

OBJECTIVES: Sample size calculation (SSC) is a pivotal step in clinical trial conception and design. Herein, we describe the frequency with which oncology phase III trials report the parameters required for SSC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically searched for phase III trials published in 6 leading journals, which were accompanied by editorials from January 2008 to October 2011. Two blinded investigators extracted required and optional parameters for SSC according to the primary endpoint. RESULTS: We retrieved 140 eligible phase III trials. The median target sample size was 596 subjects (50 to 40,000); in 66.4% of cases, the number of enrolled subjects was at least 90% of the target. The primary endpoint was a continuous variable in 5.7%, categorical in 30.0%, and a time-to-event variable in 64.3% of phase III trials. Although nearly 80% reported a target sample size, only 27.9% of the trials provided all the required parameters for proper SSC. The most commonly reported parameters for sample size computation were α (93.6%) and ß (90.7%) errors. The parameters least reported were the expected outcomes in the control or experimental groups, each provided in only 57.9% of trials. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of SSC reporting in phase III cancer trials is poor. Such incomplete reporting may compromise future study designs, pooling of data, and interpretation of results. Lack of transparency in SSC reporting may also have ethical implications.

Self-reported conflicts of interest of authors, trial sponsorship, and the interpretation of editorials and related phase III trials in oncology.

PURPOSE: Growing participation by industry in cancer research has resulted in increased reporting of conflicts of interest (COI). We aimed to test any association between authors' conclusions and self-reported COI or trial sponsorship in cancer studies. METHODS: Editorials and related phase III trials published in six clinical oncology journals in the last 3.5 years were analyzed independently by two investigators who classified study conclusions according to authors' endorsement of the experimental therapy. Logistic regression multivariable models were used to assess predictors of favorable conclusions of editorialists and of phase III authors. RESULTS: From January 2008 to October 2011, 1,485 articles were retrieved: 150 phase III trials and 150 editorials were eligible. Among the phase III trials, 82 (54.7%) had positive results, and 78 (52.0%) were entirely or partially funded by industry. Any COI were disclosed in 103 phase III trials (68.7%) and in 71 editorials (47.3%). Multivariable analysis showed that phase III trial results were the only significant predictor for a positive conclusion by trial authors (odds ratio [OR], 92.2; 95% CI, 19.7 to 431.6; P < .001). Sponsorship did not predict for positive conclusion by phase III authors (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.3 to 2.5; P = .788). The only factor associated with positive conclusions by editorial authors was a positive conclusion by phase III trial authors (OR, 36.3; 95% CI, 6.8 to 194.2; P < .001). CONCLUSION: The interpretation of recently published phase III cancer trials by their authors or by editorialists was not influenced by financial relationships or industry sponsorship. Increased awareness of COI policies may have led to more integrity in cancer research reporting.

The prevalence and influence of self-reported conflicts of interest by editorial authors of phase III cancer trials.

PURPOSE: To assess the frequency with which editorial authors report personal conflict of interest and investigate a possible association between the presence of such conflicts and favorable opinion. METHODS: Eligible studies were editorials of phase III clinical trials of antitumor drugs or symptom management published from January 2007 to December 2009 in four top oncology journals. Data from the editorials were collected and each editorial opinion was classified as favorable, neutral or unfavorable with respect to the experimental therapy. RESULTS: Fifty-four editorials were included: 23 (43%) reported at least one conflict of interest, with the most frequent one being consultancy fees. Conclusions of editorial authors were classified as favorable in 18 editorials (33%). Sensitivity analysis found an association between self-reported conflict of interest of the editorial author and editorial favorable opinion (RR:2.7; 95% CI 1.2-6.1; p=0.019). DISCUSSION: Besides the high proportion of conflict of interest among editorial authors discussing phase III clinical trials, study interpretation may be influenced by their financial relationships with industry.

Ensaios clínicos (fase III): perfil das publicações científicas. Aspectos bioéticos / Clinical trials (phase III): profile of scientific publications. Bioethical aspects.

JUSTIFICATIVA E OBJETIVOS: Tendo como referência as disposições regulatórias e as diretrizes éticas, procurou-se analisar o conteúdo de publicações referentes à pesquisa clínica (fase III) com o objetivo de verificar o grau de informação fornecido ao leitor, de modo a permitir a devida avaliação crítica. CONTEÚDO: Foram analisados 96 artigos, selecionados a partir da base de dados PubMed, publicados no ano 2005. Para a coleta dos dados foi elaborado um roteiro, tomando por base documentos regulatórios da (FDA, EMEA, MERCOSUL e ANVISA) e diretrizes Internacionais CIOMS/OMS e resoluções 196/96 e 251/97, do Conselho Nacional da Saúde.CONCLUSÃO: Verificou-se que, não raras vezes, o leitor do artigo científico não encontra dados suficientes para a sua própria avaliação crítica; vários elementos referentes às fases anteriores da pesquisa fase III, bem como elementos importantes atinentes à própria fase III, não são apresentados nas publicações em periódicos.(AU)

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: With reference to regulatory requirements and ethical guidelines sought to analyze the content of publications relating to clinical research (Phase III) in order to verify the amount of information provided to the reader in order to enable proper critical assessment.CONTENTS: We analyzed 96 articles, selected from the database PUBMED, published in 2005. For data collection was elaborated one, based on regulatory documents (FDA, EMEA, MERCOSUR and ANVISA) guidelines and International CIOMS / WHO and Resolutions 196/96 and 251/97 of the National Health. CONCLUSION: It was found that, often, the reader of the scientific data is not sufficient for its own critical assessment, several factors relating to earlier stages of the research stage III, and important elements inherent in the phase III are presented in publications in journals.(AU)

Caspofungin use in patients with invasive candidiasis caused by common non-albicans Candida species: review of the caspofungin database.

Increasing rates of invasive candidiasis caused by non-albicans Candida species have been reported worldwide. Particular concerns have been raised for C. parapsilosis because of reduced in vitro susceptibility to echinocandins. We identified 212 patients with invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans Candida species (>or=5 cases per species) in 5 clinical trials of caspofungin monotherapy from the pharmaceutical sponsor's (Merck and Co., Inc.) database: 71 cases were caused by C. parapsilosis, 65 by C. tropicalis, 54 by C. glabrata, 10 by C. krusei, 9 by C. guilliermondii, and 5 by C. lusitaniae. One hundred sixty-seven cases caused by C. albicans were also identified. Efficacy was assessed at the end of caspofungin therapy. Success (favorable overall response) required favorable clinical and microbiological responses. The mean APACHE II scores were 16.5 in the non-albicans group and 15.7 in the C. albicans group. Neutropenia at study entry was more common in the non-albicans group (12%) than in the C. albicans group (5%). The median duration of caspofungin therapy was 14 days in both groups. The success rates were 77% in both groups and at least 70% for each non-albicans species: 74% for C. parapsilosis, 71% for C. tropicalis, 85% for C. glabrata, 70% for C. krusei, 89% for C. guilliermondii, and 100% for C. lusitaniae. The times to negative blood culture were similar for the various species. The overall mortality rates were 26% in the non-albicans group and 29% in the C. albicans group. Drug-related serious adverse events and discontinuations due to caspofungin toxicity were uncommon. Although the sample sizes were limited, caspofungin demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety profiles in the treatment of invasive candidiasis caused by the following non-albicans Candida species: C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. guilliermondii, and C. lusitaniae.

Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer: a national consensus of the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM).

Identifying breast cancers with HER2 overexpression or amplification is critical as these usually imply the use of HER2-targeted therapies. DNA (amplification) and protein (overexpression) HER2 abnormalities usually occur simultaneously and both in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry may be accurate methods for the evaluation of these abnormalities. However, recent studies, including those conducted by the Association for Quality Assurance of the Spanish Society of Pathology, as well as the experience of a number of HER2 testing National Reference Centres have suggested the existence of serious reproducibility issues with both techniques. To address this issue, a joint committee from the Spanish Society of Pathology (SEAP) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) was established to review the HER2 testing guidelines. Consensus recommendations are based not only on the panellists' experience, but also on previous consensus guidelines from several countries, including the USA, the UK and Canada. These guidelines include the minimal requirements that pathology departments should fulfil in order to guarantee proper HER2 testing in breast cancer. Pathology laboratories not fulfilling these standards should make an effort to meet them and, until then, are highly encouraged to submit to reference laboratories breast cancer samples for which HER2 determination has clinical implications for the patients.