ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) and recurrences (rCDIs) remain a major public health challenge due to substantial mortality and associated costs. This study aims to generate real-world evidence on the mortality and economic burden of CDI in Germany using claims data between 2015 and 2019. METHODS: A longitudinal and matched cohort study using retrospective data from Statutory Health Insurance (SHI) was conducted in Germany with the BKK database. Adults diagnosed with CDI in hospital and community settings between 2015 and 2018 were included in the study. Patients had a minimum follow-up of 12-months. All-cause mortality was described at 6-, 12-, and 24-months. Healthcare resource usage (HCRU) and associated costs were assessed at 12-months of follow-up. A cohort of non-CDI patients matched by demographic and clinical characteristics was used to assess excess mortality and incremental costs of HCRU. Up to three non-CDI patients were matched to each CDI patient. RESULTS: A total of 9,977 CDI patients were included in the longitudinal cohort. All-cause mortality was 32%, 39% and 48% at 6-, 12-, and 24-months, respectively, with minor variations by number of rCDIs. When comparing matched CDI (n = 5,618) and non-CDI patients (n = 16,845), CDI patients had an excess mortality of 2.17, 1.35, and 0.94 deaths per 100 patient-months, respectively. HCRU and associated costs were consistently higher in CDI patients compared to non-CDI patients and increased with recurrences. Total mean and median HCRU cost per patient during follow-up was 12,893.56 and 6,050 in CDI patients, respectively, with hospitalisations representing the highest proportion of costs. A total mean incremental cost per patient of 4,101 was estimated in CDI patients compared to non-CDI patients, increasing to 13,291 in patients with ≥ 3 rCDIs. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world study conducted in Germany, CDI was associated with increased risk of death and substantial costs to health systems due to higher HCRU, especially hospitalisations. HCRU and associated costs were exacerbated by rCDIs.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Recurrence , Humans , Germany/epidemiology , Male , Clostridium Infections/mortality , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Clostridioides difficileABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Availability of several commercial tests with different Clostridioides difficile targets contributes to uncertainty and controversies around the optimal diagnostic algorithm. While numerous studies have estimated the financial impact of C. difficile infection, models to guide testing strategies decisions in developing countries, where economic value significantly impacts clinical practice, are currently not available. AIM: To determine the cost of illness of different C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnostic strategies in developing countries. METHODS: Cost-comparison analysis was performed to compare eleven different algorithms of CDI diagnosis. The basis of calculation was a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adult inpatients suspected of CDI. We analyzed turnaround time of test results (i.e., time from taking sample to results emission), test performance (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) and testing costs. Patients were divided in true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative in order to integrate test performance and economics effects. Additional medical costs were calculated: costs of hygiene, medication, length of stay and intensive care unit costs, based on a Brazilian University Hospital costs. CDI prevalence was considered 22.64%. FINDINGS: From laboratory-assisted tests, simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) presented the lowest cost of illness (450,038.70 USD), whereas standalone NAAT had the highest (523,709.55 USD). Empirical diagnosis only presented the highest overall cost (809,605.44 USD). CONCLUSION: The two-step algorithm with simultaneous GDH and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by NAAT seems to be the best strategy for CDI diagnosis in developing countries.
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/economics , Immunoassay/economics , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/economics , Algorithms , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Bacterial Toxins/analysis , Brazil , Clostridioides difficile/genetics , Clostridioides difficile/physiology , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Cost of Illness , Developing Countries/economics , False Negative Reactions , Glutamate Dehydrogenase/genetics , Humans , Immunoassay/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methodsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) affected an estimated 365,000 persons in the United States in 2017. Despite a nationally decreasing trend of CDI cases, the population incidence of recurrent CDI (rCDI) has not improved. Elderly individuals (aged ≥ 65 years) are at higher risk of CDI, rCDI, and complicated CDI compared with younger individuals. OBJECTIVE: To analyze Medicare fee-for-service data for 12 months after an initial CDI episode, in order to obtain real-world data on health care resource utilization (HRU) and costs for elderly patients with CDI and rCDI. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients who were aged ≥ 65 years and had a first (index) CDI diagnosis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2016, and continuous enrollment in Medicare Parts A, B, and D during the 12-month pre-index and 12-month post-index periods was conducted. A CDI episode was identified by either an inpatient stay with CDI diagnosis code or an outpatient medical claim with a CDI diagnosis code plus a CDI treatment. Each CDI episode was followed by a 14-day CDI claim-free period after the last CDI claim or end of CDI treatment. rCDI was a second or subsequent episode of CDI that occurred within an 8-week window after the 14-day CDI claim-free period. The number of CDI and rCDI episodes, HRU, time to recurrence, and total all-cause direct medical costs were calculated over the 12-month pre-index (baseline) and 12-month follow-up periods and stratified by number of rCDI episodes (No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, 3+ rCDI). RESULTS: A total of 268,762 patients with an index CDI were included. Mean age was 78.3 years, and 69.0% were female. HRU was higher during the 6 months immediately pre-index versus 7-12 months pre-index, including a higher proportion of patients with a hospital admission (55.1% vs. 27.5%) or emergency department visit (41.3% vs. 27.4%), respectively. Moreover, 34.7% of the study population experienced rCDI. Of those who experienced 1 recurrence, 59.1% had a second recurrence, and of those who had 2 recurrences, 58.4% had a third. During the 12-month follow-up, postacute care was used by at least 70% of each rCDI cohort. The proportion of patients with ≥ 4 hospital admissions during follow-up was highest for the 3+ rCDI cohort (24.9% of patients). During the 12-month follow-up, mean total all-cause direct costs were $76,024, $99,348, $96,148, and $96,517 for the No rCDI, 1 rCDI, 2 rCDI, and 3+ rCDI cohorts, respectively, largely driven by inpatient costs. Adjusted all-cause total costs were significantly higher for all 3 rCDI cohorts compared with the No rCDI cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly individuals experienced high rates of recurrence after their first CDI episode, and especially after a prior recurrence. The intensity of HRU during follow-up was higher for patients who suffered recurrences. Patients with rCDI had the burden of higher costs of care, including the patient out-of-pocket responsibility, versus patients with a single CDI episode. DISCLOSURES: Funding for this study was provided by Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Nelson is an employee of Ferring Pharmaceuticals, and Scott, Boules, and Unni were employees of Ferring Pharmaceuticals at the time of this study. Teigland and Parente are employees of Avalere Health and provided consulting services to Ferring Pharmaceuticals. Feuerstadt has served as a consultant to and on the speakers bureau for Merck and Co. and has served as a consultant for Ferring Pharmaceuticals and Roche Pharmaceuticals. Portions of the data contained in this study appeared as an abstract/ePoster for the AMCP Annual Meeting 2020, April 2020.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Health Resources/economics , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Medicare , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Financial incentives represent a potential mechanism to encourage infection prevention by hospitals. In order to characterize the place of financial incentives, we investigated resource utilization and cost associated with hospital-acquired infections (HAI) and assessed the relative financial burden for hospital and insurer according to reimbursement policies. METHODS: We conducted a prospective matched case-control study over 18 months in a tertiary university medical center. Patients with central-line associated blood-stream infections (CLABSI), Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) or surgical site infections (SSI) were each matched to three control patients. Resource utilization, costs and reimbursement (per diem for CLABSI and CDI, diagnosis related group (DRG) reimbursement for SSI) were compared between patients and controls, from both the hospital and insurer perspective. RESULTS: HAIs were associated with increased resource consumption (more blood tests, imaging, antibiotic days, hospital days etc.). Direct costs were higher for cases vs. controls (CLABSI: $6400 vs. $2376 (p < 0.001), CDI: $1357 vs $733 (p = 0.047) and SSI: $6761 vs. $5860 (p < 0.001)). However as admissions were longer following CLABSI and CDI, costs per-day were non-significantly different (USD/day, cases vs. controls: CLABSI, 601 vs. 719, (p = 0.63); CDI, 101 vs. 93 (p = 0.5)). For CLABSI and CDI, reimbursement was per-diem and thus the financial burden ($14,608 and $5430 respectively) rested on the insurer, not the hospital. For SSI, as reimbursement was per procedure, costs rested primarily on the hospital rather than the insurer. CONCLUSION: Nosocomial infections are associated with both increased resource utilization and increased length of stay. Reimbursement strategy (per diem vs DRG) is the principal parameter affecting financial incentives to prevent hospital acquired infections and depends on the payer perspective. In the Israeli health care system, financial incentives are unlikely to represent a significant consideration in the prevention of CLABSI and CDI.
Subject(s)
Cross Infection/prevention & control , Economics, Hospital , Medical Errors/economics , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is associated with high healthcare demands and related costs. AIM: To evaluate the healthcare and economic burden of CDI in hospitalized patients with community- (HOCA-CDI) or hospital-associated CDI (HOHA-CDI) in the National Health Service in Scotland. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted, examining data between August 2010 and July 2013 from four patient-level Scottish datasets, linked to death data. Data examined included prior antimicrobial prescriptions in the community, hospitalizations, length of stay and mortality. Each CDI case was matched to three hospital-based controls on the basis of age, gender, hospital and date of admission. Descriptive economic evaluations were based on bed-day costs for different types of wards. FINDINGS: Overall, 3304 CDI cases were included in the study. CDI was associated with additional median lengths of stay of 7.2 days for HOCA-CDI and 12.0 days for HOHA-CDI compared with their respective, matched controls. The 30-day mortality rate was 6.8% for HOCA-CDI and 12.4% for HOHA-CDI. Overall, recurrence within 90 days of the first CDI episode occurred in 373/2740 (13.6%) survivors. The median additional expenditure for each initial CDI case compared with matched controls was £1713. In the 6 months after the index hospitalization, the cost associated with a CDI case was £5126 higher than for controls. CONCLUSION: Using routinely collected national data, we demonstrated the substantial burden of CDI on healthcare services, including lengthy hospital stays and readmissions, which increased the costs of managing patients with CDI compared with matched controls.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Services/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/microbiology , Female , Hospitalization/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Scotland/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The primary study aim was to describe all direct healthcare costs associated with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), both in and out of the hospital, in patients with hematologic malignancies in the United States. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from US databases of Truven Health Analytics. PATIENTS: We analyzed health insurance claims between January 2014 and December 2017 of patients diagnosed with hematological cancer: acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukemia, Hodgkin's lymphoma, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). METHODS: Patients with CDI after cancer diagnosis (CDI+, cases) were matched with patients without CDI reported (CDI-, controls). Matched cases and controls were compared to identify the CDI-associated costs in the 90 days following the onset of CDI. RESULTS: We matched 622 CDI+ patients with 11,111 CDI- patients. NHL (41.7%) and AML (30.9%) were the predominant underlying diseases in the CDI+ groups. During study period, the average time in-hospital of CDI+ patients was 23.1 days longer than for CDI- patients (P < 2×10-16). Overall, CDI onset increased costs of care by an average of US$57,159 per patient (P = 6×10-12), mainly driven by hospital costs. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the significant economic burden associated with CDI in the United States, especially in patients with hematological malignancies. These findings highlight the need for prevention of CDI in this specific patient population.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Cost of Illness , Cross Infection , Hematologic Neoplasms , Case-Control Studies , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/economics , Cross Infection/economics , Hematologic Neoplasms/microbiology , Humans , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing among inpatients with indeterminate enzyme immunoassay (EIA) results (antigen+/toxin-) from reflexive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing to clinician-ordered PCR testing. DESIGN: Multicenter, before-and-after, quasi-experimental study. SETTING: Four large urban tertiary-care hospitals. METHODS: We evaluated two 6-month periods before and after an intervention. The primary study outcome was the change in the number of CDI diagnoses between periods. Secondary outcomes included the number of PCR tests performed, adverse events, and healthcare cost savings. RESULTS: In total, 500 EIA-indeterminate C. difficile test results were evaluated: 281 before the intervention and 219 thereafter. CDI was diagnosed by PCR among EIA-indeterminate cases in 182 in the preintervention period versus 94 patients in the postintervention period (48% reduction; P < .01). PCR testing was performed in 99.6% of indeterminate cases (280 of 281; 1 not performed due to an inhibitor) in the preintervention period versus 66% (144 of 219) in the postintervention period (34% reduction; P < .01). We observed no differences between study periods in 30-day all-cause (P = .96), GI-related (P = .93), or C. difficile (P = .47) readmissions, nor in 30-day C. difficile infections (P > .99). No patient without a PCR test in the postintervention period and not treated was later diagnosed with CDI. Each reflexive PCR test not performed led to a cost savings of $4,498 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Applying diagnostic stewardship to C. difficile PCR testing in the inpatient setting led to significant reductions in both testing and cases. Changing the C. difficile PCR testing algorithm for EIA-indeterminate cases from reflexive to clinician-required ordering resulted in valuable cost savings without associated adverse events.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections , Cost Savings , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Clostridium Infections/economics , Feces , Humans , Immunoenzyme Techniques , Inpatients , Polymerase Chain Reaction/economics , Tertiary Care Centers , Unnecessary ProceduresABSTRACT
In Japan, there is no national surveillance study of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI), and details about the epidemiology and treatment status of CDI are unknown. Additionally, clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for CDI are published by four different institutions. All CPGs recommend that the antimicrobials, vancomycin (VCM) and metronidazole (MNZ), should be selected according to disease severity. However, the trends for VCM and MNZ use in Japan remain unclear. Therefore, this study was aimed at clarifying the secular trends for VCM and MNZ use based on sales data from 2006 to 2015 and discussing its impact on CDI status and drug costs. This is the first study to clarify the antibiotic use trends for CDI treatment. We found that the total use increased over time (r = 0.0013, Pfor trend < 0.0001). While VCM use significantly decreased (r = -0.0003, Pfor trend = 0.0002), MNZ use increased (r = 0.0017, Pfor trend < 0.0001). These results show that although treatment for CDI was in line with CPGs, CDI incidence might be on an increasing trend. Additionally, despite the increased total use, the total drug costs decreased by 55% ($ 25 million) from 2006 to 2015. It was also surmised that CDI treatment in compliance with CPGs would lead to a reduction in drug costs. Hence, to understand the epidemiology of CDI, it is important to continuously investigate the use of drugs used for CDI therapy.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Vancomycin/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Clostridium Infections/economics , Drug Costs , Drug Utilization/economics , Drug Utilization/trends , Humans , Japan , Metronidazole/economics , Vancomycin/economicsABSTRACT
Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of infectious diarrhoea in hospitalised patients, representing a substantial economic burden driven mainly by increased length of hospital stay (LoS). Currently in Japan, limited evidence on CDI-associated excess LoS is available. We conducted a retrospective, matched-cohort study using a large, Japanese, hospital-based administrative database. CDI was defined as CDI treatment plus either CDI diagnosis or positive enzyme immunoassay result. Propensity score matching at the time of CDI or recurrent CDI (rCDI) onset was applied to adjust baseline confounding and immortal time bias. The analysis included 5 994 054 hospitalisation records during 2008-2017, of which 11 823 were identified as CDI and 1359 as rCDI. The median excess LoS attributable to CDI and rCDI was 3 days and 6.5 days, respectively. The excess mortality attributable to CDI was 6.9%; there was no excess mortality attributable to rCDI (-1.9%). The median difference in costs attributable to CDI and rCDI during the residual stay was JPY 130 296 (USD 1185) and JPY 81 054 (USD 737) per hospitalisation, respectively. By adjusting the biases, the burden of CDI in Japan was evaluated. The findings could support decision making and resource allocation for CDI management in Japanese hospitals.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/mortality , Comorbidity , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The cost of treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), particularly recurrent disease, is high. In clinical trials, fidaxomicin has been associated with significantly lower recurrence rates and higher sustained cure rates versus vancomycin. The high acquisition cost of fidaxomicin has limited its acceptance into clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in patients with CDI after failure of metronidazole in the Japanese healthcare setting. METHODS: Clinical results from three phase III trials and inputs based on assumptions validated by clinical experts in Japan were used in a semi-Markov model with 1-year time horizon. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for fidaxomicin versus vancomycin were expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and interpreted using willingness-to-pay thresholds of JPY 5,000,000 (primary) and JPY 7,500,000 (secondary) per QALY gained in Japan. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses and scenario analyses were performed. RESULTS: Higher drug acquisition costs for fidaxomicin were partially offset by lower hospitalization costs driven by fewer recurrences, lower costs of complications, and fewer general practitioner visits versus vancomycin. The ICER for fidaxomicin versus vancomycin was estimated at JPY 5,715,183 per QALY gained. Sensitivity analyses showed a 46% probability of fidaxomicin being cost-effective versus vancomycin at a willingness-to-pay threshold of JPY 5,000,000 per QALY gained. At a threshold of JPY 7,500,000, there was a 54% probability of fidaxomicin being cost-effective. CONCLUSIONS: Fidaxomicin treatment in patients with CDI following failure of metronidazole improves health outcomes with partial offset of higher drug acquisition costs versus vancomycin.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fidaxomicin/economics , Vancomycin/economics , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Drug Costs , Drug Utilization Review , Female , Fidaxomicin/therapeutic use , Humans , Japan , Length of Stay , Male , Metronidazole/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Network Meta-Analysis , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Recurrence , Vancomycin/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are at risk for recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (RCDI). We aimed to evaluate the potential health economic and clinical outcomes of four strategies for management of RCDI in IBD patients from the perspective of public health-care provider in Hong Kong. METHODS: A decision-analytic model was designed to simulate outcomes of adult IBD patients with first RCDI treated with vancomycin, vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, fidaxomicin and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). Model inputs were derived from literature and public data. Primary model outcomes were C. difficile infection (CDI)-related direct medical cost and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) loss. Base-case and sensitivity analysis were performed. RESULTS: Comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab, FMT saved 0.00318, 0.00149 and 0.00306 QALYs and reduced cost by USD3180, USD3790 and USD5514, respectively, in base-case analysis. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, FMT was cost-saving when comparing to vancomycin, fidaxomicin and vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab by USD3765 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3732-3798; P < 0.001), USD3854 (95%CI 3827-3883; P < 0.001) and USD6501 (95%CI 6465-6,536; P < 0.001), respectively. The QALYs saved by FMT (vs vancomycin) were 0.00386 QALYs (95%CI 0.00384-0.00388; P < 0.001), (vs fidaxomicin) 0.00179 QALYs (95%CI 0.00177-0.00180; P < 0.001) and (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) 0.00376 QALYs (95%CI 0.00374-0.00378; P < 0.001). FMT was found to save QALYs at lower cost in 99.3% (vs vancomycin), 99.7% (vs fidaxomicin) and 100.0% (vs vancomycin plus bezlotoxumab) of the 10 000 Monte Carlo simulations. CONCLUSIONS: FMT for IBD patients with RCDI appeared to save both direct medical cost and QALYs when comparing to vancomycin (with or without bezlotoxumab) and fidaxomicin.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/economics , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/economics , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/therapy , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Broadly Neutralizing Antibodies/administration & dosage , Fidaxomicin/administration & dosage , Health Personnel , Hong Kong , Humans , Public Health , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome , Vancomycin/administration & dosageABSTRACT
Toxoid vaccines against Clostridium difficile infections (CDI) appear promising in reducing the risk of developing toxin-mediated symptoms. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a vaccine candidate in a hospital setting. We developed an agent-based simulation model of nosocomial CDI in a 300-bed hospital. Targeting high-risk patients for vaccination, we estimated the reduction of symptomatic CDI. Using the net reduction of CDI-associated isolation days, we evaluated the vaccine's cost-effectiveness from a healthcare provider perspective over a 2-year period with an average monthly incidence of 5 cases per 10,000 patient-days pre-vaccination. Assuming a vaccine efficacy in the range 60-90%, vaccinating 40% of high-risk patients pre-admission reduced symptomatic CDI by 16.6% (95% CI: 15.2, 17.9). When the vaccine coverage increased to 80%, the reduction of symptomatic CDI was 34.6% (95% CI: 33.7, 35.9). For a willingness to pay (WTP) of CDN$1000 (corresponding to the average costs of case isolation per day), vaccine was cost-effective for vaccination costs per individual (VCPI) up to CDN$111 in the scenario of 40% vaccine coverage. With the same WTP, vaccine was cost-effective for VCPI up to CDN$121 when the vaccine coverage increased to 80%. A significant portion (~80%) of hospital colonization is caused by environmental transmission of C. difficile, which markedly reduced the effectiveness of vaccine below its assumed efficacy. However, due to the number of CDI-associated isolation days averted, vaccination of high-risk patients can be cost-effective depending on the WTP and the VCPI.
Subject(s)
Bacterial Vaccines/immunology , Clostridium Infections , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Cross Infection , Bacterial Vaccines/economics , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an effective therapy in recurrent Clostridium difficile infection (rCDI). It is only recommended for this indication by European and American guidelines. Other indications of FMT are being studied, such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and they have shown promising results. OBJECTIVES: To identify and review published FMT-related economic evaluations (EEs) to assess their quality and the economic impact of FMT in the treatment of these diseases. DATA SOURCES: The systematic literature research was conducted in both PubMed and Cochrane to identify EEs published before July 1, 2019. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Articles were included if they concerned FMT (whatever the disease and its line of treatment), if they reported full or partial EEs, and if they were written in English. Articles were excluded if they did not concern FMT; if they did not report an EE; or if they were a systematic review, editorial, comment, letter to the editor, practice point, or poster. METHODS: A measurement tool, AMSTAR, was used to optimize the quality of this systematic review. Based on the CHEERS checklist, data were identified and extracted from articles. The quality of each EE was assessed using the Drummond checklist. RESULTS: Overall, 9 EEs were included: all EEs were full evaluations and 8 were cost-utility analyses (CUAs). All EEs had a Drummond score ≥ 7, which indicated high quality. All CUAs related to rCDI and IBD concluded that FMT was cost-effective compared with other reference treatments, at a threshold ≤$50,000/QALY. One EE about initial CDI showed that FMT was dominated by metronidazole. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a limited number of EEs, FMT seems to be a promising and cost-effective treatment for rCDI. More EE studies on other diseases like IBD are necessary to address FMT efficiency for new indications. Therefore, our systematic review provides a framework for healthcare decision making.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/drug therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , HumansABSTRACT
Aims: This study aimed to evaluate all-cause economic outcomes, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and costs in patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) and recurrent CDI (rCDI) using commercial claims from a large database representing various healthcare settings.Materials and methods: A retrospective analysis of commercial claims data from the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database was conducted for patients aged 18-64 years with CDI episodes requiring inpatient stay with CDI diagnosis code or an outpatient medical claim for CDI plus a CDI treatment. Index CDI episodes occurred between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2017, including only those where patients were observable 6 months before and 12 months after the index episode. Each CDI episode was followed by a 14-d claim-free period. rCDI was defined as another CDI episode within an 8-week window following the claim-free period. HRU, all-cause direct medical costs and time to rCDI were calculated over 12 months and stratified by number of rCDI episodes.Results: A total of 46,571 patients with index CDI were included. Mean time from one CDI episode to the next was approximately 1 month. In the 12-month follow-up period, those with no recurrence had 1.4 inpatient visits per person and those with 3 or more recurrences had 5.8. Most patients with 3 or more recurrences had 2 or more hospital admissions. The mean annual, total all-cause direct medical costs per patient were $71,980 for those with no recurrence and $207,733 for those with 3 or more recurrences.Limitations: The study included individuals 18-64 years only. A stringent definition of rCDI was used, which may have underestimated the incidence of rCDI.Conclusions: CDI and rCDI are associated with substantial healthcare resource utilization and direct medical costs. Timing of recurrences can be predictable, providing a window of opportunity for interventions. Prevention of multiple rCDI appears essential to reduce healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Econometric , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patients with haematological diseases are at high risk of developing Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). AIM: The study aim was to describe excess length of stay and costs associated with CDI during the hospital stay for induction chemotherapy in the United States (USA). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted utilizing data from US databases of Truven Health Analytics®. Comprehensive hospitalization data of patients with induction chemotherapy due to acute myeloid leukaemia (AML), acute lymphoblastic leukaemia, Hodgkin lymphoma and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were analysed. Patients with CDI occurring during the hospital stay were compared to controls through a case-control comparison of the direct treatment costs and length of stay was performed with an exact matching algorithm. FINDINGS: A total of 2611 patients were included between January 2014 and December 2017. NHL (43.5%) and AML (38.4%) were the predominant underlying diseases and 15% of patients received a stem cell transplantation. During the matching, 105 CDI cases (CDI+) were compared with 801 controls (CDI-). On average, hospitalization costs were increased by US$36,113 in CDI+ compared to CDI- patients (P=0.009) and patients with CDI spent on average 8.9 additional days in hospital (P=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The findings highlight a significant burden associated with CDI in haematological patients undergoing induction chemotherapy in the USA. There is an important need for prevention of CDI in this specific patient population.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/economics , Cross Infection/microbiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hematologic Neoplasms/microbiology , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Clostridioides difficile , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy/adverse effects , Length of Stay , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: This cross-sectional population-based study aims to determine overall incidence rate of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in the State of South Carolina and provide an estimated cost of hospitalization due to community-associated CDI (CA-CDI). METHODS: All CDI cases in South Carolina were identified through National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) and the South Carolina Infectious Disease and Outbreak Network (SCION) from January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, excluding infants < 1 year of age. RESULTS: During the 18-month study period, 10,254 CDI events were identified in South Carolina residents with an overall incidence rate of 139/100,000 person-years. Over one-half of CDI cases were CA-CDI (5192; 51%) with an incidence rate of 71/100,000 person-years. Among patients with CA-CDI, 2127 (41%) required hospitalization with a median length of stay of 5 days. The annual burden of CA-CDI in South Carolina was estimated to be 9282 hospital days and $16,217,295 in hospitalization costs. CONCLUSION: The incidence rate of CA-CDI in South Carolina has surpassed both community-onset healthcare facility associated and hospital-onset CDI combined. The heavy burden of CA-CDI justifies dedication of public health resources to combat CDI in ambulatory settings, through antimicrobial stewardship initiatives.
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile/physiology , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Hospitalization/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Clostridium Infections/microbiology , Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Community-Acquired Infections/epidemiology , Community-Acquired Infections/microbiology , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , South Carolina/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile, previously known as Clostridium difficile) infections are a major health care concern. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that C. difficile causes almost half a million illnesses in the United States yearly, and approximately 1 in 5 patients with a C. difficile infection (CDI) will experience 1 or more recurrent infections. The incidence of infection has risen dramatically in recent years, and infection severity has increased due to the emergence of hypervirulent strains. There have been noteworthy advances in the development of CDI prevention and treatment, including a growth in the understanding of the role a patient's gut microbiome plays. The 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines made a significant change in treatment recommendations for first time CDI episodes by recommending the use of oral vancomycin or fidaxomicin in place of metronidazole as a first-line treatment. The guidelines also included detailed recommendations on the use of fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) in those patients who experience 3 or more recurrent CDI episodes. A number of novel therapies for the treatment of CDI are in various stages of development. Treatments currently in phase 3 trials include the antibiotic ridinilazole, the microbiome products SER-109 and RBX2660, and a vaccine. All of these agents have shown promise in phase 1 and 2 trials. Additionally, several other antibiotic and microbiome candidates are currently in phase 1 or phase 2 trials. A qualitative review and evaluation of the literature on the cost-effectiveness of treatments for CDI in the U.S. setting was conducted, and the summary provided herein. Due to the higher cost of newer agents, cost-effectiveness evaluations will continue to be critical in clinical decision making for CDI. This paper reviews the updated CDI guidelines for prevention and treatment, the role of the microbiome in new and recurrent infections, pipeline medications, and comparative effectiveness research (CER) data on these treatments. DISCLOSURES: Durham and Le have nothing to disclose. Cassano reports consulting fees from Baxter Healthcare. Peer reviewers Drs. Ami Gopalan and Mark Rubin and Ms. Kathleen Jarvis have nothing to disclose. Planners Dr. Christine L. Cooper and Ms. Susan Yarbrough have nothing to disclose.
Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacterial Vaccines/therapeutic use , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Anti-Bacterial Agents/economics , Bacterial Vaccines/economics , Clinical Decision-Making , Clinical Trials as Topic , Clostridioides difficile/drug effects , Clostridioides difficile/immunology , Clostridioides difficile/pathogenicity , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/immunology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Humans , Incidence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Probiotics/economics , Recurrence , Societies, Medical/standards , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) occur frequently and pose a substantial economic burden on the US healthcare system. The landscape for the treatment of CDI is evolving. AIM: To elucidate the most cost-effective strategy for managing recurrent CDI. METHODS: A decision tree analysis was created from a modified third-party payer's perspective to compare the cost-effectiveness of five strategies for patients experiencing their first CDI recurrence: oral vancomycin, fidaxomicin, fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) via colonoscopy, FMT via oral capsules, and a one-time infusion of bezlotoxumab with vancomycin. Effectiveness measures were quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $100,000 per QALY was set. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Base-case analysis showed that FMT via colonoscopy was associated with the lowest cost at $5250 and that FMT via capsules was also a cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $31205/QALY. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that FMT delivered by oral capsules and colonoscopy was comparable cost-effective modalities. At its current cost and effectiveness, bezlotoxumab was not a cost-effective strategy. CONCLUSIONS: FMT via oral capsules and colonoscopy is both cost-effective strategies to treat the first recurrence of CDI. Further real-world economic studies are needed to understand the cost-effectiveness of all available strategies.
Subject(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Clostridium Infections/economics , Clostridium Infections/therapy , Colonoscopy/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/economics , Administration, Oral , Aged , Capsules , Colonoscopy/methods , Fecal Microbiota Transplantation/methods , Humans , Models, Economic , Recurrence , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Even though the incidence of community-acquired Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is reported to be increasing, few studies have reported on the healthcare costs of community-acquired CDI. We estimated cost of care for individuals with community-associated CDI and compared with that for matched controls without CDI in the time period of six months before to one year after CDI. METHODS: All individuals in the province of Manitoba, diagnosed with CDI between July 2005 and March 2015 were matched up to 4 individuals without CDI. Health care utilization and direct costs resulting from hospitalizations, physician reimbursement claims and prescriptions were determined from the population based provincial databases. Quantile regressions were performed to determine predictors of cost of individuals with community associated CDI. RESULTS: Of all CDIs, 30-40% in each period of the study had community-associated CDI; of which 12% were recurrent CDIs. The incremental median and 90th percentile cost of care for individuals with community-associated CDI was $800 and $16,000 respectively in the six months after CDI diagnosis. After adjustment for age, co-morbidities, sex, socioeconomic status and magnitude of health care utilization prior to CDI, the median incremental cost for recurrent CDI was $1,812 and that for a subsequent episode of CDI was $3,139 compared to those with a single community-associated CDI episode. The median cost for a prescription of Vancomycin was $316 (IQR 209-489). CONCLUSIONS: Health care costs of an episode of community-associated CDI have been much more than the cost of antibiotic treatment. Our study provides population-based data for formal cost effectiveness analysis for use of newer treatments for community-associated CDI.
Subject(s)
Clostridium Infections/economics , Community-Acquired Infections/economics , Health Care Costs , Adult , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Regression AnalysisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have shown that bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) wipes reduces hospital-acquired infections (HAIs). We employed a mathematical model to assess the impact of CHG patient bathing on central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs), and hospital-onset Clostridium difficile (C diff) infections and the associated costs. METHODS: Using a Markov chain, we examined the effect of CHG bathing compliance on HAI outcomes and the associated costs. Using estimates from 2 different studies on CHG bathing effectiveness for CLABSI, CAUTI, and C diff, the number of HAIs per year were estimated along with associated costs. The simulations were conducted, assuming CHG bathing at varying compliance rates. RESULTS: At 32% reduction in HAI incidence, increasing CHG bathing compliance from 60% to 90% results in 20 averted infections and $815,301.75 saved cost. CONCLUSIONS: As CHG bathing compliance increases, yearly HAIs decrease, and the overall cost associated with the HAIs also decreases.