Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 336
Filter
1.
J Speech Lang Hear Res ; 67(5): 1635-1642, 2024 May 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38619441

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Postoperative rehabilitation programs for cochlear implant (CI) recipients primarily emphasize enhancing speech perception. However, effective communication in everyday social interactions necessitates consideration of diverse verbal social cues to facilitate language comprehension. Failure to discern emotional expressions may lead to maladjusted social behavior, underscoring the importance of integrating social cues perception into rehabilitation initiatives to enhance CI users' well-being. After conventional rehabilitation, CI users demonstrate varying levels of emotion perception abilities. This disparity notably impacts young CI users, whose emotion perception deficit can extend to social functioning, encompassing coping strategies and social competence, even when relying on nonauditory cues such as facial expressions. Knowing that emotion perception abilities generally decrease with age, acknowledging emotion perception impairments in aging CI users is crucial, especially since a direct correlation between quality-of-life scores and vocal emotion recognition abilities has been observed in adult CI users. After briefly reviewing the scope of CI rehabilitation programs and summarizing the mounting evidence on CI users' emotion perception deficits and their impact, we will present our recommendations for embedding emotional training as part of enriched and standardized evaluation/rehabilitation programs that can improve CI users' social integration and quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Evaluating all aspects, including emotion perception, in CI rehabilitation programs is crucial because it ensures a comprehensive approach that enhances speech comprehension and the emotional dimension of communication, potentially improving CI users' social interaction and overall well-being. The development of emotion perception training holds promises for CI users and individuals grappling with various forms of hearing loss and sensory deficits. Ultimately, adopting such a comprehensive approach has the potential to significantly elevate the overall quality of life for a broad spectrum of patients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Emotions , Quality of Life , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implantation/rehabilitation , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Social Perception , Speech Perception
2.
Health Expect ; 27(3): e14060, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38685588

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The disclosure of deafness is complex, given the historic and on-going stigma associated with being deaf. The aim of this study was to explore how identity, stigma, and quality of life may be impacted when using cochlear implants (CIs) and totally implantable cochlear implants (TICIs). The physical difference between these two assistive listening devices is significant, given many CI users opt to hide their sound processor behind hair or headwear, in contrast to TICIs (an emerging technology) whereby all components are implanted internally and thus invisible. METHODS: This qualitative study involved semistructured interviews and demographic questionnaires with 12 adult participants with more than 1 year of experience using their CI. Participants were recruited Australia-wide through community organisations that support deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals. Interview transcripts were analysed thematically, with the themes generated through an inductive process, with consensus generated through group working with three members from the research team. RESULTS: Four major themes were identified: (1) CI challenges; (2) The importance of social and support networks; (3) Identity and disclosure and (4) Concerns about TICIs. The underlying finding was centred around the construction of deaf identity. Participant attitudes were generally categorised as 'Loud and proud', with the recognition that displaying the CI was an extension of self, something to be proud of, and a means to normalise deafness; or 'Out of sight and out of mind', which sought to minimise the visibility of deafness. While both identities differed in how deafness is disclosed, they are fundamentally related to the same ideas of self-agency and empowerment. CONCLUSION: TICIs present a novel opportunity-the ability for CI users to control the visibility of their deafness and thus control disclosure. This study explored the impact of stigma and categorised two core identities that CI users construct. Future directions include investigating potential CI candidates, to explore if TICIs may be a facilitator to CI uptake. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The semistructured interview guide was developed in consultation with adults with CIs. Feedback led to adjustments and improvement to the interview guide. In addition, F. R. has a lived experience with hearing loss, and C. Y. L. is an executive committee member for a nonprofit charity organisation that supports families that are D/deaf and hard-of-hearing.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Qualitative Research , Quality of Life , Social Stigma , Humans , Male , Female , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Middle Aged , Deafness/psychology , Adult , Australia , Aged , Interviews as Topic , Surveys and Questionnaires
3.
Otol Neurotol ; 45(5): 507-512, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38518763

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes after cochlear implantation (CI) using the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-35 questionnaire (CIQOL-35). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Single-institution tertiary care center. PATIENTS: Patients 18 years and older who have undergone CI and CIQOL-35 survey. INTERVENTIONS: Implementing CIQOL-35 from 2019 to 2022 to measure change in QOL after CI. Statistical analysis included nonparametric, univariate, and multivariate analyses. Significance was set at 0.05. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences in QOL among CI patients in each of the CIQOL-35 domains. RESULTS: Ninety-three patients (40 female, 53 male) aged 20 to 93 years (median 70 years) turned in 164 QOL surveys (68 preactivation, 96 postactivation). Postactivation median QOL was 5 to 15 points higher across all domains ( p < 0.001). QOL score distributions among unilateral CI only, bilateral CI, and unilateral CI with contralateral hearing aid users were not statistically different ( p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified that male sex ( ß = -2.0; 95% confidence interval, -3.9 to -0.1) was a negative predictor for environment scores and not being married ( ß = 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 4.0) was a positive predictor for entertainment scores. Median follow-up time was 13 months post-CI (interquartile range [IQR], 7.1-21.5 months). CONCLUSIONS: CI patients experienced improved QOL postactivation among all QOL domains, whereas specific CI use pattern in regard to unilateral, bilateral, or bimodal did not affect QOL. Multivariate analysis identified marital status and sex as possible QOL predictors.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Quality of Life , Tertiary Care Centers , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult , Cochlear Implants/psychology
4.
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ ; 29(3): 362-376, 2024 Jun 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38240124

ABSTRACT

This study investigated the acquisition of early expressive vocabulary among young children who are deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH; n = 68) using auditory technology (hearing aids and cochlear implants). Parents completed a standardized vocabulary checklist, which allowed analyses of (i) the size of their child's spoken vocabulary; (ii) composition of the expressive lexicon (e.g., parts of speech such as nouns and verbs; semantic categories such as routines and body parts); and (iii) demographic and audiologic factors (e.g., chronologic age, degree of hearing access) potentially associated with these metrics. Young children who are DHH and use auditory technology acquired fewer spoken words than peers with typical hearing (TH) matched for chronologic age but more spoken words than peers with TH matched for listening experience. Action verbs-not nouns-significantly increased the odds of a child who is DHH achieving a vocabulary quotient within the normative range. These findings support the exploration of early expressive vocabulary size and composition-especially the number of active verbs-to guide clinical management and decision-making for young children who are DHH.


Subject(s)
Deafness , Vocabulary , Humans , Child, Preschool , Male , Female , Deafness/psychology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Language Development , Hearing Aids/psychology , Child , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Infant
5.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 25(1): 81-92, 2024 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38111171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Device activation typically occurs four weeks post cochlear implant surgery. Emerging evidence suggests earlier activation is feasible and beneficial, giving patients quicker access to sound and rehabilitation. OBJECTIVES: Assess current literature for effects of early cochlear implant activation. METHODS: Electronic searches of Medline/PubMed, AMED, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library following PRISMA guidelines. Studies investigating any aspect of early activation were included for review. RESULTS: From 15 studies, 625 patients received early activation, compared with 243 patients in the control groups. Early activation was considered as within 7 days post-operatively with 12 studies reporting within 1 day post-operatively, compared with standard activation of 9-46 days post-operatively in the control group. Some studies indicated earlier low levels of impedance in the early activation group. Magnet strength adjustment or off-ear processor wear was often recommended within the early activation cohort. Complication rates were low in both groups. Early activation improved patient satisfaction and anxiety levels without detriment to speech recognition or rehabilitation. CONCLUSION: Early cochlear implant activation is feasible and allows patients with no contraindications, earlier access to auditory perception and rehabilitation and reduces anxiety linked to delay in activation. Further evidence is required to monitor long-term effects of early activation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Humans , Auditory Perception , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Patient Satisfaction , Postoperative Period , Speech Perception , Time Factors
6.
J Commun Disord ; 105: 106370, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37683553

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the level of satisfaction with life (SWL) in a group of cochlear implant (CI) users who had been prelingually deaf but were orally educated. They had received one or two CIs (as a child, adolescent, or adult) and were highly competent Polish speakers. This study looked at three factors that may affect SWL - psychosocial, deafness/hearing and communication related, and sociodemographic. METHODS: The participants were prelingually deaf CI users who had learned highly competent spoken Polish as their primary language. They had been educated in mainstream or integrated schools (not schools for the deaf), and had no other disability or severe illness. Measurements were done with 5 questionnaires: the Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS), the I-Others Questionnaire, the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), the Deaf Identity Development Scale (DIDS), and the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire (NCIQ). RESULTS: The SWL level of the group was similar to that of the standard Polish population. SWL was positively related to positive self-perception, acceptance of oneself as a deaf person, and to perceiving the benefits of having a CI (as measured by three NCIQ domains: self-esteem, activity limitations, and social interactions). On the other hand, negative self-perception, marginal deaf identity, and depressive symptoms were negatively related to SWL. There was no relationship between SWL and knowledge of sign language. Lower depressive symptoms and greater hearing loss were both significant predictors of SWL, although those who used two CIs generally had a lower SWL. CONCLUSIONS: Prelingually deaf CI users with low SWL require psychological support in many spheres, including working through problems of deaf identity, self-acceptance, and depression. Additional research should involve diverse DHH CI users, including those with limited spoken Polish competency or sign language skills, as well as members of the Polish Deaf community.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Persons With Hearing Impairments , Adult , Child , Adolescent , Humans , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Deafness/psychology , Poland , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology
7.
Laryngoscope ; 133(9): 2379-2387, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36300628

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine long-term speech and cognition outcomes in older adult cochlear implant (CI) recipients. First, by evaluating if CI performance was maintained over an extended follow-up period regardless of preoperative cognitive status. Secondly, by evaluating if there was a difference in the rate of cognitive decline between preoperative mild and normal cognition following CI over an extended period of time. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: CI recipients ≥65 years of age implanted between 2009 and 2014 with 4+ years follow up. Pre- and postoperative audiometric and speech outcome assessments were collected. Cognitive status was measured using the mini mental status examination (MMSE) at numerous time points. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met inclusion. Patients were divided into two groups based on preoperative MMSE with scores considered normal (28-30) and those with mildly impaired cognition (MIC, scores 25-27). Audiometric and speech performance improved significantly at one-year post implantation and this was maintained without significant change at 4+ years, regardless of cognitive status. Mixed modeling analysis controlling for age demonstrated no significant difference in the rate of cognitive decline at 4+ years post implantation between the normal cognition cohort (1.74; 95%CI 0.89-2.6) and MIC (2.9; 95%1.91-3.88). CONCLUSION: Speech performance was significantly improved and sustained after CI in both normal cognition and MIC patients. The rate of cognitive decline in older adult CI patients appears to be similar regardless of preoperative cognitive status. Although results demonstrate rates of cognitive decline following CI did not differ between cognition groups over 4+ years, future studies will need to further investigate this over extended time periods with a more comprehensive cognitive testing battery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:2379-2387, 2023.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Cognitive Dysfunction , Speech Perception , Humans , Aged , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Cognition , Treatment Outcome
8.
Am Ann Deaf ; 168(4): 191-212, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38588097

ABSTRACT

The researchers investigated parents' perspectives on the outcome of cochlear implantation on the deaf child and the family in Saudi Arabia with respect to linguistic, social, psychological, and educational aspects. They also explored potential factors influencing parents' perspectives on the outcome of a cochlear implant (CI). Seventy-seven parents completed the questionnaire, and multiple linear regression and descriptive statistics were used to answer the research questions. Most of the parents (88.5%) reported choosing a CI for their deaf child because they wanted their child to be part of the hearing world. About half of the parents (49.4%) expressed the belief that the CI would help their child find a better job in the future. The study also found that, overall, the model was not significant, and the independent variables explained little of the variance in parents' perspectives on the outcome of their child's cochlear implantation.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Deafness , Child , Humans , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Saudi Arabia , Deafness/psychology , Parents/psychology , Cochlear Implants/psychology
9.
Audiol Neurootol ; 27(2): 133-138, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34380141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Emotions are often conveyed via visual and together with the auditory mode in social interaction. We aimed to investigate the ability to recognize facial and/or auditory emotions in school-aged children with cochlear implantation and healthy controls. METHODS: All participants were asked to respond to facial emotions of Ekman and Friesen's pictures, then auditory emotions, and last, they were asked to respond to video-based dynamic synchronous facial and auditory emotions. RESULTS: The mean accuracy rates in recognizing anger (p = 0.025), surprise (p = 0.029), and neutral (p = 0.029) faces were significantly worse in children with cochlear implants (CIs) than in healthy controls. They were significantly worse than healthy controls in recognizing all auditory emotions except auditory emotion of fear (p = 0.067). The mean accuracy rates in recognizing video-based auditory/facial emotions of surprise (p = 0.031) and neutral (p = 0.029) emotions were significantly worse in children with CIs. CONCLUSION: The children with hearing loss were poorer in recognizing surprise, anger, and neutral facial emotions than healthy children; they had similar performance in recognizing anger emotions when both stimuli were given synchronously which may have a positive effect on social behaviors. It seems beneficial that emotion recognition training should be included in rehabilitation programs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants , Facial Recognition , Child , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Emotions , Facial Expression , Humans , Recognition, Psychology
10.
Ear Hear ; 43(2): 323-334, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34406157

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Identification of emotional prosody in speech declines with age in normally hearing (NH) adults. Cochlear implant (CI) users have deficits in the perception of prosody, but the effects of age on vocal emotion recognition by adult postlingually deaf CI users are not known. The objective of the present study was to examine age-related changes in CI users' and NH listeners' emotion recognition. DESIGN: Participants included 18 CI users (29.6 to 74.5 years) and 43 NH adults (25.8 to 74.8 years). Participants listened to emotion-neutral sentences spoken by a male and female talker in five emotions (happy, sad, scared, angry, neutral). NH adults heard them in four conditions: unprocessed (full spectrum) speech, 16-channel, 8-channel, and 4-channel noise-band vocoded speech. The adult CI users only listened to unprocessed (full spectrum) speech. Sensitivity (d') to emotions and Reaction Times were obtained using a single-interval, five-alternative, forced-choice paradigm. RESULTS: For NH participants, results indicated age-related declines in Accuracy and d', and age-related increases in Reaction Time in all conditions. Results indicated an overall deficit, as well as age-related declines in overall d' for CI users, but Reaction Times were elevated compared with NH listeners and did not show age-related changes. Analysis of Accuracy scores (hit rates) were generally consistent with d' data. CONCLUSIONS: Both CI users and NH listeners showed age-related deficits in emotion identification. The CI users' overall deficit in emotion perception, and their slower response times, suggest impaired social communication which may in turn impact overall well-being, particularly so for older CI users, as lower vocal emotion recognition scores have been associated with poorer subjective quality of life in CI patients.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation , Cochlear Implants , Speech Perception , Adult , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Quality of Life , Voice Recognition
11.
PLoS One ; 16(5): e0251050, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33979380

ABSTRACT

Some deaf children continue to show difficulties in spoken language learning after cochlear implantation. Part of this variability has been attributed to poor implicit learning skills. However, the involvement of other processes (e.g. verbal rehearsal) has been underestimated in studies that show implicit learning deficits in the deaf population. In this study, we investigated the relationship between auditory deprivation and implicit learning of temporal regularities with a novel task specifically designed to limit the load on working memory, the amount of information processing, and the visual-motor integration skills required. Seventeen deaf children with cochlear implants and eighteen typically hearing children aged 5 to 11 years participated. Our results revealed comparable implicit learning skills between the two groups, suggesting that implicit learning might be resilient to a lack of early auditory stimulation. No significant correlation was found between implicit learning and language tasks. However, deaf children's performance suggests some weaknesses in inhibitory control.


Subject(s)
Education of Hearing Disabled/methods , Learning/physiology , Memory, Short-Term/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implantation/education , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Deafness/surgery , Female , Hearing/physiology , Humans , Language , Language Development , Male , Memory/physiology , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Speech/physiology
12.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol ; 30(2): 740-747, 2021 03 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734823

ABSTRACT

Purpose Youth with cochlear implants (CIs) are at risk for delays in verbal short-term memory (STM)/working memory (WM), which adversely affect language, neurocognitive, and behavioral outcomes. Assessment of verbal STM/WM is critical for identifying and addressing these delays, but standard assessment procedures require face-to-face (FTF) administration. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and validity of remote testing methods (teleassessment) of verbal STM/WM in youth with CIs as a method of addressing COVID-19-related restrictions on FTF test administration. Method Tests of verbal STM/WM for nonwords, digit spans, letter-number sequences, sentences, and stories were individually administered by speech-language pathologists over a teleassessment platform to 28 youth (aged 9-22 years) with CIs and 36 same-aged normal-hearing peers. Examiners, parents, and participants completed quality and satisfaction ratings with the teleassessment procedure. Teleassessment scores were compared to results of tests obtained at FTF visits an average of 1.6 years earlier. Results Quality and satisfaction ratings for teleassessment were high and in almost all cases did not differ between the CI and normal-hearing samples. Youth with CIs scored lower than normal-hearing peers on measures of verbal STM/WM, and scores for digit span and letter-number sequencing did not differbetween teleassessment and FTF methods. Correlations across teleassessment and FTF visits were strong for digit span, letter-number sequencing, and sentence memory, but were more modest for nonword repetition. Conclusion With some caveats, teleassessment of verbal STM/WM was feasible and valid for youth with CIs.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Memory, Short-Term , Speech Perception , Speech-Language Pathology/methods , Telemedicine/methods , Adolescent , COVID-19/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Child , Cochlear Implants/adverse effects , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
13.
Am Ann Deaf ; 165(5): 510-526, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678717

ABSTRACT

The purpose of the research was to understand the quality of life of children from Saudi Arabia with cochlear implants (CIs) from the parental perspective in terms of communication abilities, social skills, academic achievement, being well adapted for future life, rehabilitation knowledge, and stress due to hearing loss. A quantitative approach was used, in which a questionnaire was administered to 103 children with CIs. The results showed high levels of expectations with respect to communication abilities, social skills, academic achievement, being well adapted for future life, and rehabilitation knowledge. The parents were observed to be highly stressed by their children's disability. Pearson's correlation and linear regression analysis were used to test the association of the characteristics of the implanted children on factors of quality of life.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Correction of Hearing Impairment/psychology , Deafness/rehabilitation , Parents/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adult , Child, Preschool , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Female , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Humans , Infant , Linear Models , Male , Saudi Arabia , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment Outcome
14.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 147(4): 368-376, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33599710

ABSTRACT

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdowns in Ontario, Canada in the spring of 2020 created unprecedented changes in the lives of all children, including children with hearing loss. Objective: To quantify how these lockdowns changed the spoken communication environments of children with cochlear implants by comparing the sounds they were exposed to before the Ontario provincial state of emergency in March 2020 and during the resulting closures of schools and nonessential businesses. Design, Setting, and Participants: This experimental cohort study comprised children with hearing loss who used cochlear implants to hear. These children were chosen because (1) their devices monitor and catalog levels and types of sounds during hourly use per day (datalogs), and (2) this group is particularly vulnerable to reduced sound exposure. Children were recruited from the Cochlear Implant Program at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Ontario, Canada. Children whose cochlear implant datalogs were captured between February 1 and March 16, 2020, shortly before lockdown (pre-COVID-19), were identified. Repeated measures were collected in 45 children during initial easing of lockdown restrictions (stages 1-2 of the provincial recovery plan); resulting datalogs encompassed the lockdown period (peri-COVID-19). Main Outcomes and Measures: Hours of sound captured by the Cochlear Nucleus datalogging system (Cochlear Corporation) in 6 categories of input levels (<40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, ≥80 A-weighted dB sound pressure levels [dBA]) and 6 auditory scene categories (quiet, speech, speech-in-noise, music, noise, and other). Mixed-model regression analyses revealed main effects with post hoc adjustment of confidence intervals using the Satterthwaite method. Results: A total of 45 children (mean [SD] age, 7.7 [5.0] years; 23 girls [51.1%]) participated in this cohort study. Results showed similar daily use of cochlear implants during the pre- and peri-COVID-19 periods (9.80 mean hours pre-COVID-19 and 9.34 mean hours peri-COVID-19). Despite consistent device use, these children experienced significant quieting of input sound levels peri-COVID-19 by 0.49 hour (95% CI, 0.21-0.80 hour) at 60 to 69 dBA and 1.70 hours (95% CI, 1.42-1.99 hours) at 70 to 79 dBA with clear reductions in speech exposure by 0.98 hour (95% CI, 0.49-1.47 hours). This outcome translated into a reduction of speech:quiet from 1.6:1.0 pre-COVID-19 to 0.9:1.0 during lockdowns. The greatest reductions in percentage of daily speech occurred in school-aged children (elementary, 12.32% [95% CI, 7.15%-17.49%]; middle school, 11.76% [95% CI, 5.00%-18.52%]; and high school, 9.60% [95% CI, 3.27%-15.93%]). Increased daily percentage of quiet (7.00% [95% CI, 4.27%-9.74%]) was most prevalent for children who had fewer numbers of people in their household (estimate [SE] = -1.12% [0.50%] per person; Cohen f = 0.31). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study indicate a clear association of COVID-19 lockdowns with a reduction in children's access to spoken communication.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Communication , Pandemics , Quarantine , Speech Perception , Child , Deafness/psychology , Deafness/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Ontario/epidemiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Environment
15.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(7): 490-496, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31597532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech understanding in noise and patient satisfaction using the new Cochlear Wireless Phone Clip device. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-nine experienced cochlear implant (CI) users (>6 months usage) were situated in a soundproof room where a 65 dB SPL Spanish cocktail noise was generated continuously from 4 loudspeakers. Lists of disyllabic words were presented through the clinic landline telephone to the patients. Patients were tested first holding the phone and then with the Cochlear Phone Clip© paired to the CP910 using various mixing ratios (2:1, 4:1, and Phone Clip© only). RESULTS: Statistically significant (P < .001) improvement of speech recognition performance was found in cell phone usage by wireless transmission and also when using this new device. Kepler questionnaire results showed that before using Phone Clip in everyday life, 55.2% of patients described themselves highly or greatly affected by their deafness for telephone use and 80% moderately to greatly affected. Kim questionnaire results showed statistically significant differences (P < .001) in the subjective satisfaction of the Bluetooth-implemented CI compared to the conventional mode for sound quality, noise interference, and sound accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: The wireless Phone Clip© device helps implanted people to improve subjective and objective speech recognition performance through the phone in noisy environments.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Deafness/psychology , Speech Perception , Telephone/instrumentation , Wireless Technology/instrumentation , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cell Phone , Cochlear Implantation/instrumentation , Deafness/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Noise , Patient Satisfaction , Prospective Studies , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
16.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch ; 52(1): 335-353, 2021 01 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33112723

ABSTRACT

Purpose Better auditory prostheses and earlier interventions have led to remarkable improvements in spoken language abilities for children with hearing loss (HL), but these children often still struggle academically. This study tested a hypothesis for why this may be, proposing that the language of school becomes increasingly disconnected from everyday discourse, requiring greater reliance on bottom-up phonological structure, and children with HL have difficulty recovering that structure from the speech signal. Participants One hundred nineteen fourth graders participated: 48 with normal hearing (NH), 19 with moderate losses who used hearing aids (HAs), and 52 with severe-to-profound losses who used cochlear implants (CIs). Method Three analyses were conducted. #1: Sentences with malapropisms were created, and children's abilities to recognize them were assessed. #2: Factors contributing to those abilities were evaluated, including phonological awareness, phonological processing, vocabulary, verbal working memory, and oral narratives. #3: Teachers' ratings of students' academic competence were obtained, and factors accounting for those ratings were evaluated, including the five listed above, along with word reading and reading comprehension. Results #1: Children with HAs and CIs performed more poorly on malapropism recognition than children with NH, but similarly to each other. #2: All children with HL demonstrated large phonological deficits, but they were especially large for children with CIs. Phonological awareness explained the most variance in malapropism recognition for children with CIs. Vocabulary knowledge explained malapropism recognition for children with NH or HAs, but other factors also contributed. #3: Teachers rated academic competence for children with CIs more poorly than for children with NH or HAs, and variance in those ratings for children with CIs were primarily explained by malapropism scores. Conclusion Children with HL have difficulty recognizing acoustic-phonetic detail in the speech signal, and that constrains their abilities to follow conversations in academic settings, especially if HL is severe enough to require CIs. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.13133018.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Language , Reading , Speech Perception , Child , Cochlear Implantation/methods , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Memory, Short-Term , Phonetics , Speech , Vocabulary
17.
Saudi Med J ; 41(10): 1139-1143, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026057

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To validate and assess the reliability of the new version of an Arabic speech intelligibility rating among di erent raters. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis was carried out between December 2018 and January 2019. Thirty cochlear-implant (CI) children (study group) and 30 subjects (control group) were enrolled. Study candidates' speech skills were evaluated using the translated Arabic SIR by parents and original SIR by professions such as speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Inter-rater agreement, test-retest reliability, pre- and post-intervention score (responsiveness test), patient versus control score comparison (discriminant validity), and cross-validation of Arabic SIR have all been assessed. RESULTS: There was a good sense of agreement between the post-operative SIR parents' assessments and the professional SLPs' assessments (r=0.920, p less than 0.001). The mean of study subjects pre- and post-implantation score of Arabic SIR showed a statistically significant difference (p less than 0.001). CONCLUSION: The Arabic SIR demonstrated excellent reliability with strong consistency. It showed its clinical ability in distinguishing healthy subjects from patients along with follow up of speech development skills over time. The Arabic SIR can be used by parents to evaluate post-CI progress of their children.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Intelligence Tests , Speech Disorders/rehabilitation , Speech Intelligibility/physiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Language , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Saudi Arabia , Speech Disorders/etiology , Speech Disorders/psychology
18.
Clin Interv Aging ; 15: 1555-1568, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32982193

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Nowadays cochlear implantation (CI) is the treatment of choice in adults in case conventional hearing devices fail. Besides speech perception, an improvement in quality of life and in cognitive performance has been reported. Thereby, the study focused on the impact of age. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Thirty middle-aged (MA) between 50 and 64 years and 41 older subjects (OA) aged 65 and older with bilateral severe hearing loss performed a comprehensive computer-based neurocognitive test battery (ALAcog) pre- and 12 months post-implantation. Besides, monosyllabic speech perception in quiet (Freiburg monosyllabic speech test), health-related quality of life (HR-QoL, Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire) and depressive symptoms (GDS-15) have been assessed. RESULTS: Both age groups significantly improved in all three categories after 12 months. No differences were evaluated between MA and OA regarding speech perception and HR-QoL pre- and post-operatively. In contrast, cognitive performance differed between the age groups: pre-operatively OA performed worse in most neurocognitive subdomains like working memory (p=0.04), inhibition (p=0.004), processing speed (p=0.003) and mental flexibility (p=0.01), post-operatively MA outperformed OA only in inhibition (p=0.01). Age only slightly influenced cognitive performance in MA, whereas in OA age per se tremendously impacted on working memory (p=0.04), inhibition (p=0.02), memory (p=0.04) and mental flexibility (p=0.01). Educational level also affected processing speed, mental flexibility (p=0.01) and working memory (p=0.01). This was more pronounced in OA. In both age groups, hearing status had a strong effect on attentional tasks (p=0.01). In MA, depressive symptoms were more influential on cognitive functioning and on HR-QoL than in OA. Improvement in quality of life (p=0.0002) and working memory (p=0.001) was greater for those with a higher pre-operative depression score. CONCLUSION: Speech perception and HR-QoL improved in hearing impaired, independently of age. Pre-operative differences in cognitive performance between OA and MA clearly attenuated 12 months after CI. Impact of comorbidities differed between age groups.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Cochlear Implants/psychology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Cochlear Implantation/statistics & numerical data , Cochlear Implants/statistics & numerical data , Cognition , Female , Hearing Loss/therapy , Hearing Tests , Humans , Male , Memory, Short-Term , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Speech Perception/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 21(6): 338-343, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32643593

ABSTRACT

Objectives: Cochlear implants are known to significantly improve the quality of life (QoL) of implanted children. However, variability exists between self-reported outcomes and parental-reported QoL questionnaires. We evaluated the QoL agreement between children and their parents following cochlear implantation and determined which factors lead to increased agreement. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed including pediatric cochlear implant recipients and their parents. We evaluated postoperative QoL using The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL). To assess agreement between pediatric and parental QoL perception, PedsQL intra-class correlations (ICCs) were calculated. Results: Thirty-five children and their parents completed QoL questionnaires. Children who were evaluated between 8-12 years of age reported highest absolute total and subscale PedsQL scores. Highest agreement was found amongst parents and children when: (1) children were between 8-12 years at QoL assessment (ICC: between 0.917[95%CI: 0.676-0.981] and 0.972[95%CI: 0.882-0.994]), and (2) when evaluating the physical health QoL domain (ICC: 0.964[95%CI: 0.849-0.992]). Conclusions: This study demonstrates high agreement (ICC > 0.8) between pediatric and parental QoL report in children aged between 8-12 years at QoL assessment. Therefore, results confirm that: (1) QoL agreement between pediatric self-report and parent proxy-report is high in chronically ill children and (2) children using cochlear implants can reliably report QoL between 8-12 years.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Parents/psychology , Proxy/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Cochlear Implantation/psychology , Correlation of Data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Reproducibility of Results , Self Report
20.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol ; 135: 110127, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32485467

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigates if children with cochlear implants (CI) are associated with delayed development of Theory of Mind (ToM) and the differences in gain of ToM ability with respect to age, language and other aspects of CI. METHODS: One-hundred-eleven children with participation of their hearing parents, aged between 36 months and 132 months, who had congenital profound bilateral deafness and were unilateral CI users; plus 99 healthy children underwent 'Peabody Picture Vocabulary' and 'Sally-Anne' tests. A total of 77 children with CI (mean age: 76.51 months, 31 girls and 46 boys) and 82 healthy children (mean age: 72.41 months, 47 girls and 35 boys) were included in the analyses. Analytic comparisons were created between the controls and children with CI and between subgroups of CI users by univariate and multivariate analysis. The effects of age of hearing aid use, age of CI surgery, duration of CI use, language scores and the presence of risk factors, early rehabilitation with hearing aid and CI on the ToM development were analyzed. RESULTS: The Sally-Anne test success rates of 67.1% were significantly higher in controls than that of children with CI (49.4%) (p < 0.05). The mean age difference of the children, who were successful in Sally-Anne test was 5.33 months in favor of healthy controls. The ToM task success rates were 57.1% (24/42) and 40% (14/35) in children with early CI and late CI respectively. The children, who were good at language, were also better in Sally-Anne tests, but the mean Peabody Picture Vocabulary test scores were indifferent in the same age group with respect to the presence of CI use (p > 0.05). However, multivariate analysis presented the higher language scores as the only significant independent variable that has impact on the success in Sally-Anne test (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results revealed that among all children, who did better in ToM were older in age and better in language skills. Children with CI also performed better in false-belief test depending on their language scores. Early CI surgery, older age, and hence longer CI use can provide a well-developed ToM for children with CI.


Subject(s)
Cochlear Implants/psychology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/psychology , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/rehabilitation , Language Development , Theory of Mind , Age Factors , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss, Bilateral/surgery , Humans , Infant , Language , Language Tests , Male , Vocabulary
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...