ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: We investigated coexisting lesion types in patients with invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) in a multinational study for comprehending the adenoma-carcinoma and serrated pathway about the development of CRC. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 3,050 patients enrolled in the international randomized controlled trial (ATLAS study) to evaluate the colorectal polyp detection performance of image-enhanced endoscopy in 11 institutions in four Asian countries/regions. In the current study, as a subgroup analysis of the ATLAS study, 92 CRC patients were extracted and compared to 2,958 patients without CRC to examine the effects of age, sex, and coexisting lesion types (high-grade adenoma [HGA], low-grade adenoma with villous component [LGAV], 10 adenomas, adenoma ≥10 mm, sessile serrated lesions [SSLs], and SSLs with dysplasia [SSLD]). Additional analyses of coexisting lesion types were performed according to sex and location of CRC (right- or left-sided). RESULTS: A multivariate analysis showed that HGA (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 4.29 [2.16-8.18]; p < 0.01), LGAV (3.02 [1.16-7.83], p = 0.02), and age (1.04 [1.01-1.06], p = 0.01) were independently associated with CRC. According to sex, the coexisting lesion types significantly associated with CRC were LGAV (5.58 [1.94-16.0], p < 0.01) and HGA (4.46 [1.95-10.20], p < 0.01) in males and HGA (4.82 [1.47-15.80], p < 0.01) in females. Regarding the location of CRC, SSLD (21.9 [1.31-365.0], p = 0.03) was significant for right-sided CRC, and HGA (5.22 [2.39-11.4], p < 0.01) and LGAV (3.46 [1.13-10.6], p = 0.02) were significant for left-sided CRC. CONCLUSIONS: The significant coexisting lesions in CRC differed according to sex and location. These findings may contribute to comprehending the pathogenesis of CRC.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Adenoma/pathology , Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Adenoma/complications , Colonoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Polyps/complications , Sex Factors , Adult , Age FactorsSubject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Colonoscopy , Diarrhea , Humans , Female , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Diarrhea/etiology , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Colon, Sigmoid/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Sigmoid Neoplasms/complications , Sigmoid Neoplasms/pathology , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Sigmoid Diseases/pathology , Sigmoid Diseases/complications , Sigmoid Diseases/diagnostic imagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Little is known about the risk factors of bleeding after colonoscopic polypectomy in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). This study investigated the incidence and risk factors of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB), including immediate and delayed bleeding, in patients with ESRD. METHODS: Ninety-two patients with ESRD who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy between September 2005 and June 2020 at a single tertiary referral center were included. The patients' medical records were retrospectively reviewed. Patient- and polyp-related factors associated with immediate PPB (IPPB) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Additionally, the optimal cutoff polyp size related to a significant increase in the risk of IPPB was determined by performing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS: In total, 286 polyps were removed. IPPB occurred in 24 (26.1%) patients and 46 (16.1%) polyps and delayed PPB occurred in 2 (2.2%) patients. According to multivariate analysis, the polyp size (> 7 mm), old age (> 70), and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) as the polypectomy method (EMR versus non-EMR) were found to be independent risk factors for IPPB. According to the Youden index method, the optimal cutoff polyp size to identify high-risk polyps for IPPB was 7 mm (AUC = 0.755; sensitivity, 76.1%; specificity, 69.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopic polypectomy should be performed with caution in patients with ESRD, especially in those with the following risk factors: advanced age (> 70 years), polyp size > 7 mm, and EMR as the polypectomy method.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Aged , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonoscopy/methods , Retrospective Studies , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Risk Factors , Intestinal Polyps , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the correlation between colorectal polyps (CRP) and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, and the correlation between CRP and the expression of phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p-S6K1). Besides, its related influencing factors were determined in the present study. METHODS: A total of 191 subjects who underwent colonoscopy in our hospital from January 2020 to February 2022 were selected for this study. Among them, 141 patients were diagnosed with CRP, and the other 50 subjects were no significant colorectal abnormalities. 141 CRP patients were divided into H. pylori-positive group (n = 89) and H. pylori-negative group (n = 52) according to the results of the H. pylori test. The expression of p-S6K1 in CRP tissue was detected. The relationship between the p-S6K1 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of CRP patients was analyzed. The logistic analysis of factors influencing the occurrence of CRP was performed. RESULTS: There were significant differences in pathological type, site of disease, the number and size of polyps between the H. pylori negative group and the H. pylori positive group (P < 0.001, P = 0.037, P = 0.042 and P = 0.039). The percentage of the p-S6K1 positive expression in polyp tissues was higher than that in normal tissue and parapolyp tissues (P < 0.001). The p-S6K1 negative group showed significant difference in the number and pathological type of polyps and the presence or absence of a pedicle as compared with the p-S6K1 positive group (P = 0.006, P < 0.001 and P = 0.012). Logistic multifactor analysis showed that BMI, H. pylori infection, smoking history, ApoB, Lp(a) and the p-S6K1 positive expression were all risk factors for the development of CRP (P = 0.025, P = 0.020, P = 0.010, P = 0.005, P = 0.043 and P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: H. pylori infection was closely related to the pathological type, location, and the number and size of CRP. p-S6K1 was highly expressed in CRP, and was positively related to the number, the pathological type and pedicle of polyps. H. pylori infection and the positive p-S6K1 expression were independent risk factors for CRP. By exploring the association between H. pylori infection as well as p-S6K1 and CRP, it is hoped that it will help to formulate a more rigorous colorectal cancer screening program for H. pylori-positive individuals, and at the same time find a new direction for the prevention of CRP and colorectal cancer, and provide some help for future research.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Helicobacter Infections/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Introduction: Colonoscopy with polypectomy is an efficacious procedure in reducing the risk of colorectal cancer development, the precursor are adenomatous polyps. The most common method for resection of polyps measuring 4-10 mm are cold (CSP) and hot snare polypectomy (HSP). CSP has a lower incidence of adverse events, especially delayed post-polypectomy bleeding. Aim: To evaluate the presence of immediate and delayed bleeding in the cold snare polypectomy of sub-centimeter polyps of the colon compared with hot snare polypectomy. Materials and Methods: This prospective clinical study is comprised all patients who were incidentally detected to have adenomatous colonic polyps measuring 4-10 mm during a colonoscopy screening. Polypectomy was done with (hot snare) or without electrocautery (cold snare). After removal of polyps, immediate bleeding, delayed bleeding, and methods for were analyzed. Results: The CSP and HSP groups included 116 patients, 113 (54.4%) polyps in 61 (52.6%) patients with CSP while 95 (45.6%) polyps in 55 (47.4%) patients with HSP. 25 (22.1%) polyps after CSP had immediate bleeding. In 5 patients (20.0%), five hemostatic clips were inserted after CSP for bleeding longer than 150 sek. The average percentage difference between immediate bleeding versus total number of resected polyps using the cold snare method is not statistically significant (p<0.05) (Difference test, p=0.0000). Delayed bleeding was not registered using this method. In the second investigated group (HSP), one patient had delayed bleeding. This was stopped with 2 clips. Immediate bleeding was not registered. Conclusion: CSP is safer than HSP in resecting colon polyps sized 4-10 mm, without risk of delayed bleeding.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps , Colonic Polyps , Humans , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colonoscopy/methods , Prospective Studies , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Adenomatous Polyps/surgery , Adenomatous Polyps/complicationsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the frequency of recurrence after colonoscopic high-frequency electroresection of intestinal polyps and analyse the risk factors associated with recurrence. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. Place and Duration of the Study: Second People's Hospital of Hefei, China, from January 2017 to January 2021. METHODOLOGY: Clinical data of 240 patients with intestinal polyps who underwent high-frequency electroresection were analysed. After two years, patients with recurring polyps were categorised into recurrence or non-recurrence groups. Intestinal polyp recurrence was the dependent variable, and patient characteristics, medical history, and gastrointestinal parameters were independent variables. Variables significant in univariate analysis were included in unconditional binary logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in gender, BMI, smoking history, drinking history, previous gastrointestinal bleeding, location of polyps, intestinal cleanliness, and high-fat diet between groups (p >0.05). Age (≥60 years), number of polyps (≥3), diameter (≥2 cm), adenomatous polyps, Helicobacter pylori infection, metabolic syndrome proportion, and C-reactive protein levels were significantly higher in the recurrent group (p <0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed age (≥60 years), number of polyps (≥3), diameter (≥2 cm), adenomatous polyps, and metabolic syndrome as the factors associated with recurrence (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Age, greater number of intestinal polyps, larger diameter, histopathological type, and the presence of metabolic syndrome are factors influencing intestinal polyp recurrence after endoscopic high-frequency electroresection. KEY WORDS: Intestinal polyps, Colonoscope, High-frequency electroresection, Recurrence.
Subject(s)
Adenomatous Polyps , Colonic Polyps , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Metabolic Syndrome , Humans , Middle Aged , Helicobacter Infections/complications , Intestinal Polyps/surgery , Intestinal Polyps/complications , Adenomatous Polyps/complications , Risk Factors , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy is considered the most effective screening method for colorectal polyps. However, the longevity and complexity of the procedure makes it less desirable to screen for colorectal polyps in the general population. Therefore, it is essential to identify other independent risk factors. In this study, we explored the link between Hp infection, atrophic gastritis, and colorectal polyps to identify a new potential risk factors of colorectal polyps. METHODS: In this study, atrophic gastritis and intestinal polyps were diagnosed by endoscopy and pathology. All the 792 patients in this retrospective study were divided into sub-groups based on the presence of colorectal polyps. The correlation between polyps and atrophic gastritis was analyzed using the chi-square test and Kruskal-Wallis test. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the predictive value for colorectal polyps between Hp infection and atrophic gastritis. Binary logistic regression was utilized to identify independent risk factors for colorectal polyps. RESULTS: Patients with colorectal polyps were primarily male with advanced age, and the number of patients with colorectal polyps had a higher association with smoking, alcohol drinking, and Hp infection than the control group. A positive correlation between the number of colorectal polyps and the severity of atrophic gastritis was observed. ROC analysis showed that atrophic gastritis was a better risk factors for colorectal polyps. Multivariate analysis identified atrophic gastritis as an independent risk factor for colorectal polyps (OR 2.294; 95% CI 1.597-3.296). CONCLUSIONS: Atrophic gastritis confirmed could be an independent risk factors for colorectal polyps.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Gastritis, Atrophic , Helicobacter Infections , Helicobacter pylori , Humans , Male , Gastritis, Atrophic/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/complications , Helicobacter Infections/diagnosis , Risk Factors , ColonoscopyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The role of submucosal injection during cold snare polypectomy (CSP) remains uncertain. In this study, we investigated the impact of submucosal saline injection during CSP for colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm. METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized controlled trial conducted in 6 Chinese centers between July and September 2020 (ChiCTR2000034423). Patients with nonpedunculated colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either CSP with submucosal injection (SI-CSP) or conventional CSP (C-CSP). The primary outcome was the incomplete resection rate (IRR). Secondary outcomes included procedure time, intraprocedural bleeding, delayed bleeding, and perforation. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients with 234 polyps in the SI-CSP group and 150 patients with 216 polyps in the C-CSP group were included in the analysis. The IRR was not decreased in the SI-CSP group compared with that in the C-CSP group (1.7% vs 1.4%, P = 1.000). The median procedure time in the SI-CSP group was significantly longer than that in the C-CSP group (108 seconds vs 48 seconds, P < 0.001). The incidences of intraprocedural bleeding and delayed bleeding were not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P = 0.531 and P = 0.250, respectively). There was no perforation in either group. DISCUSSION: Submucosal saline injection during CSP for colorectal polyps sized 3-9 mm did not decrease the IRR or reduce adverse events but prolonged the procedure time.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonoscopy/methods , Microsurgery/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Lower Gastro intestinal bleeding (LGIB) is one of the most important clinical symptoms which have significant morbidity and mortality. It has an annual admission rate of 0.15% with mortality rate of 5-10%. LGIB can be caused by number of causes which includes both neoplastic and non-neoplastic lesions. Colonoscopy is the gold standard diagnostic measure which is simple, convenient and cost effective procedure. The present study was aimed to assess the Colonoscopic profile of LGIB presenting to our tertiary care centre in south India. The study was conducted for 6 months period. MATERIALS: This is a hospital based study cross-sectional observational study conducted in a tertiary health care centre. A total number of 58 adult subjects with LGIB aged above 18 years were recruited in this study and History, clinical examination, blood tests were taken. RESULT: In our study among the 58 subjects, 33 were male. Majority of our patients were between the mean age of 31-40 years. Most colonoscopic findings were suggestive of ulcerative colitis which equalled to 31%. Other different aetiologies of LGIB were as following: CA colon (15%), haemorrhoids (15%), colonic polyps (14%) CA anal canal (5%) and so on. Majority of our patients had moderate anaemia which was equal to 45%, due to persistent LGIB. CONCLUSION: The incidence of lower GI bleeding increased with increasing age among our patients. The leading cause of lower GI bleeding was found to be ulcerative colitis. It was followed by CA colon, haemorrhoids and colonic polyps hence colonoscopy is recommended in all patients chronic LGIB. References Hilsden RJ, Shaffer EA. Management of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Can Fam Physician 1995;41:1931-6, 1939-41. Sahn B, Bitton S. Lower gastrointestinal bleeding in children. Gastrointest Endosc Clin NA 2016;26(1):75-98.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Colonic Neoplasms , Colonic Polyps , Hemorrhoids , Child , Humans , Adult , Male , Aged , Female , Hemorrhoids/complications , Colonic Polyps/complications , Tertiary Care Centers , Cross-Sectional Studies , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Colonoscopy/adverse effectsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While post-inflammatory polyps (PIPs) have historically been a risk factor for colorectal neoplasia (CRN), histologic activity may explain this association. We aimed to assess the impact of histologic activity on CRN occurrence in IBD patients with colonic PIPs. METHODS: Patients with PIPs on surveillance colonoscopy at Saint-Antoine hospital between 1 January 1996 and 31 December 2020 were included and subsequent colonoscopies were assessed. Histologic IBD activity was assessed by the Nancy histologic index. Survival and Cox regression analysis were performed to assess the strength of the association of PIPs and other patient variables with progression to CRN. RESULTS: A total of 173 patients with at least two surveillance colonoscopies with PIPs at index colonoscopy were compared to a similar group of 252 patients without PIPs. In survival analysis, the presence or PIPs at index colonoscopy did not impact the risk of CRN in patients with histological inflammation (p = 0.83) and in patients without histological inflammation (p = 0.98). The risk of CRN was associated with increasing Nancy index score of 3 or 4 (HR: 4.16; 95% CI 1.50-11.52 and HR: 3.44; 95% CI 1.63-7.24), age (HR per 10-year increase: 1.37; 95% CI 1.13-1.66) and first-degree family history of colorectal cancer (HR: 5.87; v 1.31-26.26), but not PIPs (HR: 1.17; 95% CI 0.63-2.17). CONCLUSIONS: After controlling for histologic activity, PIPs do not increase the risk of CRN in IBD patients. Histologic activity rather than PIPs should be considered in the risk assessment of CRN.
Subject(s)
Colitis, Ulcerative , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Colitis, Ulcerative/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Colonoscopy , Inflammation/complicationsABSTRACT
Serrated polyps (SP) are precursors for colorectal cancer and contribute disproportionately to postcolonoscopy cancers. Leveraging three U.S. cohorts (43,974 women and 5,322 men), we developed prediction models for high-risk SPs (sized ≥10 mm or ≥3) among individuals undergoing their first colonoscopy screening. We then validated the model in the Partners Colonoscopy Cohort (51,203 women and 39,077 men). We evaluated discrimination and calibration using the C-statistic and Hosmer-Lemeshow test, respectively. The age and family history model generated a C-statistic [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 0.57 (0.56-0.58) in women and 0.58 (0.55-0.61) in men. Further inclusion of smoking, alcohol, and body mass index (the simple model) increased the C-statistic (95% CI) to 0.68 (0.67-0.69) in women and 0.68 (0.66-0.71) in men (all P < 0.001). Adding more predictors did not provide much incremental predictivity. In the validation cohort, moderate discrimination was observed in both women (0.60, 0.58-0.61) and men (0.60, 0.59-0.62). Notably, the simple model also yielded similar C-statistics for a composite endpoint of SPs and high-risk conventional adenomas (women, 0.62, 0.62-0.63; men, 0.63, 0.61-0.64). The model was adequately calibrated in both sets of cohorts. In summary, we developed and externally validated a simple prediction model based on five major risk factors for high-risk SPs that may be useful for healthy lifestyle recommendations and tailored colorectal cancer screening. PREVENTION RELEVANCE: On the basis of four prospective studies in the United States, we developed and externally validated a simple risk prediction model for high-risk SPs in the setting of colonoscopy screening. Our model showed moderate discriminatory accuracy and has potential utility for individualized risk assessment, healthy lifestyle recommendations, and tailored colorectal cancer prevention.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Female , United States/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/epidemiology , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUNDY: Colonoscopy is often performed in the initial workup of pelvic floor dysfunction, even in the absence of red flag symptoms. Current guidelines suggest colonoscopy is only required in the presence of rectal bleeding, diarrhoea or change in bowel habit. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of significant pathology found at colonoscopy in patients with pelvic floor dysfunction. METHODS: Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients presenting to a functional colorectal outpatient clinic between May 2018 and August 2019. Information was collected on presenting symptoms, whether colonoscopy had been performed within 5 years, quality of bowel preparation, withdrawal time, number of polyps detected, histology, presence of diverticular disease, colorectal malignancy, inflammatory bowel disease, solitary rectal ulcer or rectal prolapse. RESULTS: There were 260 patients seen within the study period, of which 67% had undergone recent colonoscopy within the last 5 years. The mean age was 53 and 219 (84%) patients were female. Average withdrawal time was 13 min. Polyps were found in 48.7% and adenomas in 32.4% of all colonoscopies. The adenoma detection rate was 32.7%. None of the colonoscopies found evidence of malignancy. A new diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease was discovered in two patients. CONCLUSION: There was low rates of serious pathology such as malignancy or inflammatory bowel disease in patients referred to a functional clinic. However, colonoscopy is still useful in workup of pelvic floor dysfunction, as many patients have erratic bowel habits or vague symptoms, and will have adenomas found.
Subject(s)
Adenoma , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , Polyps , Humans , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Pelvic Floor/pathology , Colonoscopy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Adenoma/diagnosis , Polyps/pathology , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/complications , Inflammatory Bowel Diseases/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/epidemiologyABSTRACT
Background: Mature colonic teratomas are rare tumors and no case, to the best of our knowledge, has been reported from the African continent. In addition, some pedunculated teratomas in the colon have been treated by endoscopic polypectomy and classified as primary teratoma of the colon. We report a case of a distinct intra sigmoid pedunculated teratoma originating from the retroperitoneum of a 4-year-old African girl and we highlight the potential for misclassification of primary origin of endoscopically removed polypoid teratomas in the colon. Case Presentation: A 4 year-old black African female child who presented with abdominal pain and hematochezia. On clinical assessment, she was found to be anaemic and to have a sigmoid colon mass. At surgery, there was a mobile mass within the lumen of sigmoid colon and the mass was fixed to the retroperitoneum by a stalk of tissue. Pathologist's review of the resected sigmoid segment showed a pedunculated intra-sigmoid mass with the stalk traversing the wall of the colon. The mass was histologically proven a mature solid teratoma. Conclusions: This, to the best of our knowledge, is the first report of intra sigmoid teratoma from the African continent. It highlights the potential for misclassification of endoscopically resected colonic teratomas.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Teratoma , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Abdomen , Colon, Sigmoid/surgery , Colon, Sigmoid/pathology , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/diagnosis , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/etiology , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/surgery , Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage/pathology , Teratoma/complications , Teratoma/diagnosis , Teratoma/surgeryABSTRACT
Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) was originally described in 1973 and is currently a popular practice used in treating polyps, small adenomas, and early cancers. Although the safety of EMR has been proven in numerous studies, complications occur occasionally. We report a case in which the patient complained of severe upper abdominal pain and who was diagnosed with acute appendicitis after colorectal EMR. The patient recovered well after surgery. Cautious observation is necessary when resuming oral intake in patients who undergo colorectal EMR and who complain of postoperative abdominal pain. Observation is especially important for patients with a fecalith that may have originally existed in the appendix or in the colon near the appendix.
Subject(s)
Appendicitis , Colonic Polyps , Colorectal Neoplasms , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Abdominal Pain/complications , Appendicitis/etiology , Appendicitis/surgery , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , HumansSubject(s)
Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Colon/pathology , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/pathology , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy , Patients , DiagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal polyp is a common disease of the gastrointestinal tract, which is closely related to colorectal cancer. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a major public health disease that seriously threatens human health. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of colorectal polyps and its relationship with type 2 DM (T2DM). METHODS: A total of 352 patients with colorectal polyps (diagnosed by colonoscopy) in our hospital from June 2018 to June 2020 were enrolled as the observation group, and 201 healthy people with normal colonoscopy results were selected as the control group. The levels of blood lipids, blood glucose, liver function, serum uric acid (UA), and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were compared between the two groups. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the risk factors related to colorectal polyps. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, the levels of HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour post-meal blood glucose (2hPG), total cholesterol (TC), and serum UA in the observation group were significantly higher (P<0.05). Univariate analysis showed that the incidence of colorectal polyps was significantly correlated with gender, smoking, age, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (P<0.05). Multiple Logistic regression analysis showed that gender (male), age (≥60 years), and T2DM were independent risk factors for colorectal polyps (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Abnormal metabolic indices may be closely related to the development of colorectal polyps. Gender (male), age (≥60 years), smoking, NAFLD, T2DM, as well as increased blood glucose, UA, and TC were identified as the risk factors for colorectal polyps.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Colonic Polyps/complications , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/complications , Glycated Hemoglobin/metabolism , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , Uric AcidABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: It was not yet fully established whether the use of antiplatelet agents (APAs) is associated with an increased risk of colorectal post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). Temporarily, discontinuation of APAs could reduce the risk of PPB, but at the same time, it could increase the risk of cardiovascular disease recurrence. This study aimed to assess the PPB risk in patients using APAs compared to patients without APAs or anticoagulant therapy who had undergone colonoscopy with polypectomy. METHODS: A systematic electronic search of the literature was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and CENTRAL, to assess the risk of bleeding in patients who do not interrupt single antiplatelet therapy (P2Y12 inhibitors or aspirin) and undergone colonoscopy with polypectomy. RESULTS: Of 2417 identified articles, 8 articles (all of them were non-randomized studies of interventions (NRSI); no randomized controlled trials (RCT) were available on this topic) were selected for the meta-analysis, including 1620 patients on antiplatelet therapy and 13,321 controls. Uninterrupted APAs single therapy was associated with an increased risk of PPB compared to the control group (OR 2.31; CI 1.37-3.91). Patients on P2Y12i single therapy had a higher risk of both immediate (OR 4.43; CI 1.40-14.00) and delayed PPB (OR 10.80; CI 4.63-25.16) compared to the control group, while patients on aspirin single therapy may have a little to no difference increase in the number of both immediate and delayed PPB events. CONCLUSIONS: Uninterrupted single antiplatelet therapy may increase the risk of PPB, but the evidence is very uncertain. The risk may be higher in delayed PPB. However, in deciding to discontinue APAs before colonoscopy with polypectomy, the potential higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events should always be assessed.
Subject(s)
Colonic Polyps , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors , Aspirin/adverse effects , Colonic Polyps/complications , Colonic Polyps/surgery , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Hemorrhage/etiology , Humans , Intestinal Polyps , Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors/adverse effects , Postoperative Hemorrhage/chemically induced , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) remains an uncommon although serious complication of colonoscopy. The aim of this study is to determine the PPB-prevalence in a secondary care hospital and its associated risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We collected data from 581 patients, with the removal of 1593 polyps between August 2017 and August 2019. A univariate binary logistic regression analysis was conducted retrospectively. RESULTS: PPB occurred in only 10 cases, representing 1.7% of patients: immediate in 1.2% and delayed in 0.5%. The number of removed polyps per patient [4.5 (SD 2.59) for hemorrhagic vs. 2.74 (SD 1.98) for non-hemorrhagic group] and the propofol dose [232 mg (SD 93.07) for hemorrhagic vs. 133 mg (SD 57.28) for non-hemorrhagic group] were relevant patient-related risk factors. The polyp-based analysis showed the polyp size [18.4 mm (SD 10.44) for hemorrhagic vs. 4.42 mm (SD 4.29) for non-hemorrhagic group], the morphology [wide-based: OR 24.83 (95 % CI 2.76 - 223.44), pedunculated: OR 56.67 (95 % CI 5.03 - 638.29)], the location at ileocecal valve [OR 20.48, 95 % CI 1.81 - 231.97)], and the polypectomy method [hot snare piecemeal with epinephrine injection: OR 75.38 (95 % CI 7.67 - 741.21)] as significant risk factors for PPB, too. CONCLUSIONS: The low rate of PPB confirms the safety of the procedure in non-tertiary, high-volume colonoscopy centers. The number of polyps removed per patient, the polyp size, morphology and location, as well as the sedation dose and the method of polypectomy were shown as relevant risk factors.