ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic affected cancer care globally. Evaluating the impact of the pandemic on the quality of cancer care delivery is crucial for understanding how changes in care delivery may influence outcomes. Our study compared care delivered during the early phase of the pandemic with the same period in the previous year at two institutions across continents (Princess Margaret Cancer Center [PM] in Canada and A.C. Camargo Cancer Center [AC] in Brazil). METHODS: Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal or anal cancer between February and December 2019 and the same period in 2020 were analyzed. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and performance of individual indicators within and between centers and between the peri-COVID-19 and control cohorts were tested using Cohen's h test to assess the standardized differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Among 925 patients, distinct effects of the early COVID-19 pandemic on oncology services were observed. AC experienced a 50% reduction in patient consultations (98 v 197) versus a 12.5% reduction at PM (294 v 336). Similarly, AC experienced a higher proportion of stage IV disease presentations (42.9% v 29.9%; P = .015) and an increase in treatment delay (61.9% v 9.7%; P < .001) compared with prepandemic. At PM, a 10% increase in treatment interruption (32.4% v 22.3%; P < .001) and a higher rate of discontinuation of radiotherapy (9.4% v 1.1%; P < .001) were observed during the pandemic. Postsurgical readmission rates increased in both AC (20.9% v 2.6%; P < .001) and PM (10.5% v 3.6%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: The early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic affected the quality of care delivery for colorectal and anal cancers at both centers. However, the magnitude of this impact was greater in Brazil.
Subject(s)
Anus Neoplasms , COVID-19 , Cancer Care Facilities , Colorectal Neoplasms , Quality of Health Care , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/therapy , Anus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Anus Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Female , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Aged , Quality of Health Care/standards , Canada/epidemiology , Cancer Care Facilities/standards , Cancer Care Facilities/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics , AdultABSTRACT
Tumor hypoxia may compromise the results of chemotherapy for treating colorectal cancer because it stimulates angiogenesis and the release of tumor growth factors. Hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) supplementation may potentiate the effects of chemotherapy in such cases. This study aimed to assess the effect of HBO therapy combined with chemotherapy on the treatment of colorectal cancer in mice. C57BL6 mice were submitted to the intrarectal instillation of N-methyl-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and treated with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and/or HBO therapy. The MNNG group presented the highest dysplastic crypt rate. The 5FU + HBO group presented the highest rate of apoptotic cells per dysplastic crypt. The 5FU group presented the highest expression of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha and CD44. HBO therapy increased the effect of 5FU on the treatment of the experimental colorectal neoplasia in mice.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Fluorouracil , Hyperbaric Oxygenation , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Animals , Fluorouracil/pharmacology , Mice , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Male , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/pharmacology , Apoptosis/drug effects , Hypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha Subunit/metabolism , Hyaluronan Receptors/metabolism , Combined Modality Therapy , Methylnitronitrosoguanidine/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major cause of cancer-related deaths globally. While treatment advancements have improved survival rates, primarily through targeted therapies based on KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations, personalized treatment strategies for CRC remain limited. Immunotherapy, mainly immune checkpoint blockade, has shown efficacy in various cancers but is effective in only a small subset of patients with CRC with deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) proteins or high microsatellite instability (MSI). Recent research has challenged the notion that CRC is immunologically inert, revealing subsets with high immunogenicity and diverse lymphocytic infiltration. Identifying precise biomarkers beyond dMMR and MSI is crucial to expanding immunotherapy benefits. Hence, exploration has extended to various biomarker sources, such as the tumor microenvironment, genomic markers, and gut microbiota. Recent studies have introduced a novel classification system, consensus molecular subtypes, that aids in identifying patients with CRC with an immunogenic profile. These findings underscore the necessity of moving beyond single biomarkers and toward a comprehensive understanding of the immunological landscape in CRC, facilitating the development of more effective, personalized therapies.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Immunotherapy , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/immunology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Immunotherapy/methods , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment/immunology , Microsatellite InstabilityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will identify the patterns of survival, treatment, and recurrence among Hispanic and/or Latino/a/x (H/L) patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) living in the United States (US) and Puerto Rico. Additionally, population- and individual-level determinants of cancer outcomes among H/L CRC patients will be mapped to highlight under-reported/under-investigated research areas. INTRODUCTION: CRC is the third most common cancer excluding skin cancers in the US. Unlike non-Hispanic White populations, cancer is the number one cause of death in H/L populations and currently represents 21% of total deaths. Despite this, a lack of consensus exists on CRC outcomes for H/L patients. Most research on H/L individuals has examined incidence and screening of CRC, with fewer studies focusing on cancer outcomes. INCLUSION CRITERIA: All epidemiological study designs and systematic reviews will be considered. The review will only include peer-reviewed studies that report on survival, treatment, and/or recurrence patterns for H/L patients with CRC residing in the US and Puerto Rico. METHODS: A 3-step search with a 2-stage study selection process will be followed, as recommended by JBI and Arksey and O'Malley. Databases to be searched will include MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Ovid), and Scopus. A data extraction tool will be designed based on JBI recommendations. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRSIMA-ScR) will be used, with the results presented in a PRISMA diagram. Publications in English from database inception to the present will be considered. REVIEW REGISTRATION: Open Science Framework https://osf.io/y6qf5.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Hispanic or Latino , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/ethnology , Puerto Rico/epidemiology , Puerto Rico/ethnology , United States/epidemiology , Research Design , Review Literature as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, enhancer RNAs (eRNAs) have garnered attention as pivotal biomarkers for the onset and progression of cancer. However, the landscape of eRNAs and the implications of eRNA-based molecular subtypes in stage II/III colorectal cancer (CRC) remain largely unexplored. METHODS: Comprehensive profiling of eRNAs was conducted on a public stage II/III CRC cohort with total RNA-seq data. We used unsupervised clustering of prognostic eRNAs to establish an eRNA-based subtyping system. Further evaluations included molecular characteristics, immune infiltration, clinical outcomes, and drug responses. Finally, we validated the eRNA-based subtyping system in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) CRC cohort. RESULTS: We identified a total of 6453 expressed eRNAs, among which 237 were prognostic. A global upregulation of eRNAs was observed in microsatellite-stable (MSS) CRCs when compared to microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) CRCs. Through consensus clustering, two novel molecular subtypes, termed Cluster 1(C1) and Cluster 2(C2), were further identified. C1, associated with the activation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), hypoxia, and KRAS signaling pathways, showed poorer prognosis. C2, correlated with the canonical CRC subtype, exhibited superior survival outcomes. In addition, C1 showed enrichment with immune infiltration and more sensitivity to immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSION: Our study unravels the molecular heterogeneity of stage II/III CRC at the eRNA level and highlights the potential applications of the novel eRNA-based subtyping system in predicting prognosis and guiding immunotherapy.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Enhancer RNAs , Humans , Prognosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Microsatellite Instability , ImmunotherapyABSTRACT
Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a heterogeneous disease. We reviewed the current clinical trials on immunotherapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with high microsatellite instability and microsatellite stability. Owing to the advances in immunotherapy, its use has gradually expanded from second- and third-line therapies to first-line, early neoadjuvant, and adjuvant therapies. Based on current research results, immunotherapy has shown very good results in dMMR/MSI-H patients, whether it is neoadjuvant therapy for operable patients or first-line or multi-line therapy for advanced patients. KEYNOTE 016 study also showed that patients with MSS were basically ineffective in single immunotherapy. Moreover, immunotherapy for colorectal cancer may also require identification of new biomarkers.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Microsatellite Instability , Immunotherapy/methodsABSTRACT
Introduction: Returning to work is an important cancer recovery milestone. Permanent colostomy can be required for rectal cancer treatment and can significantly impact well-being. We aimed to evaluate the impact of permanent colostomy on health-related quality of life and return to work in patients with rectal cancer. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study on 23 employed patients receiving curative surgery for rectal cancer requiring permanent colostomy. Demographic and health-related quality-of-life questionnaires (the Colostomy Impact Score (CIS), the EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30, and the EORTC QLQ-CR29) were posted to eligible patients. Results: On average, patients (10 female, 13 male, mean age 61.8 years) were 5.0 ± 3.5 years post-surgery. At the time of questioning, 73.9% had returned to work (21.7% changed their type of work), while 17.4% never returned to work. Of those that returned to work, 11.8% returned within 1 month of surgery, while 23.5% had not returned after 12 months. Comparison of CIS between patients that returned to the same work (14.6 ± 0.93), changed their work (13.0 ± 0.74), and did not return to work (14.3 ± 2.3) revealed no significant differences (p = 0.36). CIS did not correlate with days worked on return, or time to return to work (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Returning to work following rectal cancer treatment with permanent colostomy is challenging, with 17.4% never returning to work. Of those who returned to work, 23.5% required more than 12 months. This was not associated with CIS in our study. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Middle Aged , Aged , Colostomy/adverse effects , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Return to Work , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: Almost 25% of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients have synchronous colorectal liver metastasis (SCLM) coinciding with the disease diagnosis. Liver-first approach for the treatment of SCLM involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy, subsequent liver resection, and then primary tumor resection. This strategy is adopted as the prognosis of the disease depends mainly on the metastases, not the primary tumor. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of the liver-first approach and clinical prognosis in managing SCLM. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 25 patients with SCLM from July 2015 to July 2020. All patients were subjected to a liver-first approach with an "intention-to-treat" approach. Follow-up was planned for at least 3 years. Data were collected from the hospital records and included survival rates and univariate analyses of the prognostic factors, such as gender, age, and number of chemotherapy cycles to evaluate their effect on the survival probability. Results: Nineteen patients completed the treatment paradigm. Long-term outcomes reported a median overall survival (OS) of 32 months. One-year and 3-year survival probabilities were 89.5% and 42.1%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 13 months. The number of metastatic lesions, unilobar versus bilobar disease, and the frequency of administered chemotherapy cycles significantly affected survival (p < 0.05). Seven patients (36.84%) remained disease free (no recurrence) while 2 patients (10.53%) survived with recurrence. The overall mortality included 10 deaths (52.63%) due to recurrence. Conclusion: Synchronous colorectal liver metastasis treated with the liver-first approach achieved a notable overall advantage. However, the recurrence rate remained relatively high. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Liver Neoplasms/secondary , Postoperative Complications , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer death in the world and is estimated to have been responsible for almost 935,000 deaths during 2020. OBJECTIVE: Describe clinicopathological features, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in CRC patients under 30 years. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study in patients under 30 years diagnosed with CRC. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 1823 patients were diagnosed with CRC, of which 54 (2.96%) were under 30 years. The OS, during 4 years, was 41.5%. The clinical stage found IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), giving neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 0.705; 95% CI: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) and no medical history of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.925; 95% CI: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) are independent predictors of mortality. The PFS, during 4 years, was 21.3%. Clinical stage IV (HR: 2.418; 95% CI: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050), and no diagnosis of Lynch syndrome (HR: 3.800; 95% CI: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) are independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: Younger patients are usually diagnosed with CRC in advanced stages. Early symptoms and evaluation, irrespective of age, are crucial.
ANTECEDENTES: El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es la segunda causa de muerte por cáncer en el mundo y se estima que fue responsable de casi 935,000 muertes durante el año 2020. OBJETIVO: Describir las características clinicopatológicas, la supervivencia global (SG) y la supervivencia libre de progresión (SLP) en pacientes con CCR menores de 30 años. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo en pacientes con diagnóstico de CCR menores de 30 años. RESULTADOS: Entre 2017 y 2021 se diagnosticaron 1823 pacientes con CCR, de los cuales 54 (2.96%) eran menores de 30 años. La SG a 4 años fue del 41.5%. Se encontró que la etapa clínica IV (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.212; intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%]: 2.504-15.414; p < 0.001), recibir tratamiento neoadyuvante (HR: 0.705; IC95%: 0.499-0.996; p = 0.047) y no tener antecedente de síndrome de Lynch (HR:3.925; IC95%: 1.355-11.364; p = 0.012) son predictores de mortalidad independientes. La SLP a 4 años fue del 21.3%. La etapa clínica IV (HR: 2.418; IC95%: 1.000-5.850; p < 0.050) y el no contar con diagnóstico de síndrome de Lynch (HR: 3.800; IC95%: 1.398-10.326; p = 0.009) son predictores independientes. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes jóvenes son diagnosticados con CCR en etapas avanzadas. Los síntomas iniciales, junto con la evaluación, independientemente de la edad, son cruciales.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms, Hereditary Nonpolyposis , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Proportional Hazards Models , Neoadjuvant TherapyABSTRACT
Primary colorectal diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is very rare colon malignancy. It is important to know the main demographic and clinical characteristics of these patients. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 18 patients diagnosed with primary colorectal DLBCL during a 17-year period at the National Cancer Institute of Brazil (INCA) between 2000 and 2018. Demographic characteristics, tumor localization, HIV status, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, treatment modality and follow-up status were obtained from medical records. Survival was estimated from the date of diagnosis until death. There were 11 male and seven female patients in our cohort, the median age at diagnosis was 59.5 years and four patients were HIV positive. Tumor was mainly localized in the right colon. Patients were treated with chemotherapy (CT) and/or surgical resection. Eleven patients died during a median follow-up of 59 months and the median survival time was 10 months. Six or more cycles of CT (HR=0.19; CI 95% 0.054-0.660, p = 0.009), LDH levels below 350 U/L (HR=0.229; CI 95% 0.060-0.876, p = 0.031) and surgical resection (HR=0.23; CI 95% 0.065-0.828, p = 0.030) were associated with reduced risk of death in univariate analysis. Patient's age and DLBCL right colon localization should be considered at diagnosis to distinguish between DLBCL and other diseases for differential diagnosis. Six cycles of CT, LDH levels below 350 U/L and surgical resection were associated with better survival. Our results are consistent with previous publications and address the importance of correct colorectal DLBCL diagnosis and treatment.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse , Humans , Male , Female , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Tertiary Care Centers , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/diagnosis , Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the impact of systemic cancer therapy on the quality of life, mental well-being, and life satisfaction of cancer patients. METHODS: This prospective study was promoted by the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) and enrolled patients with localized, resected, or unresectable advanced cancer from 15 Spanish medical oncology departments. Patients completed surveys on quality of life (EORTC-QoL-QLQ-C30), psychological distress (BSI-18) and life satisfaction (SWLS) before and after systemic cancer treatment. RESULTS: The study involved 1807 patients, 944 (52%) having resected, localized cancer, and 863 with unresectable advanced cancer. The mean age was 60 years, and 53% were female. The most common types of localized cancer were colorectal (43%) and breast (38%), while bronchopulmonary (32%), non-colorectal digestive (23%), and colorectal (15%) were the most frequent among those with advanced cancer. Before systemic treatment, patients with advanced cancer had poorer scores than those with localized cancer on physical, role, emotional, cognitive, social limitations, symptoms, psychological distress, and life satisfaction (all p < 0.001), but there were no differences in financial hardship. Patients with localized cancer had greater life satisfaction and better mental well-being than those with advanced cancer before systemic treatment (p < 0.001). After treatment, patients with localized cancer experienced worsening of all scales, symptoms, and mental well-being (p < 0.001), while patients with advanced disease had a minor decline in quality of life. The impact on quality of life was greater on all dimensions except economic hardship and was independent of age, cancer location, and performance status in participants with resected disease after adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, our study highlights that systemic cancer treatment can improve quality of life in patients with advanced cancer, while adjuvant treatments for localized disease may have a negative impact on quality of life and psychological well-being. Therefore, treatment decisions should be carefully evaluated on an individual basis.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Quality of Life , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Male , Quality of Life/psychology , Prospective Studies , Emotions , Psychological Well-Being , Surveys and Questionnaires , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) indicates advanced stage cancer, which is generally associated with a poor outcome and a 6 to 12 months. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is an option for treating patients with primary PC, such as mesothelioma, or secondary PC, such as colorectal cancer (CRC) or pseudomixoma. Until recently, such patients were deemed untreatable. The purpose of this study was to assess the results of CRS + HIPEC in patients with PC. Postoperative complications, mortality and survival rates were evaluated according to the diagnosis. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with PC, undergoing full CRS + HIPEC between October 2004 and January 2020, were enrolled. The mortality rate was 3.8% and the morbidity rate was 61.5%. Complications were significantly higher in proportion to the duration of surgery (p<0.001). The overall survival rates, as shown in the Kaplan-Meyer curve, were respectively 81%, 74% and 53% at 12, 24 and 60 months. Survival rates according to each diagnosis for the same periods were 87%, 82% and 47% in patients with pseudomixoma, and 77%, 72% and 57% in patients with CRC (log-rank 0.371, p=0.543). CONCLUSION: CRS with HIPEC is an option for pacients with primary or secondary PC. Although complication rates are high, a longer survival rate may be attained compared to those seen in previously published results; in some cases, patients may even be cured.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Hyperthermia, Induced , Mesothelioma, Malignant , Peritoneal Neoplasms , Humans , Peritoneal Neoplasms/surgery , Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy , Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures , Mesothelioma, Malignant/drug therapy , Survival Rate , Combined Modality Therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , PrognosisABSTRACT
Despite significant advances in the surgical and systemic therapy of colorectal cancer (CRC) in recent decades, recurrence rates remain high. Apart from microsatellite instability status, the decision to offer adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with CRC is solely based on clinicopathologic factors, which offer an inaccurate risk stratification of patients who derive benefit from adjuvant therapy. Owing to the recent improvements of molecular techniques, it has been possible to detect small allelic fractions of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and therefore, to identify patients with minimal residual disease (MRD) after curative-intent therapies. The incorporation of ctDNA identifying MRD in clinical practice may dramatically change the standard of care of CRC, refining the selection of patients who are candidates for escalation and de-escalation of adjuvant chemotherapy, and even for organ-preservation strategies in rectal cancer. In the present review, we describe the current standard of care and the DNA sequencing methodologies and assays, present the data from completed clinical studies and list ongoing potential landmark clinical trials whose results are eagerly awaited, as well as the impact and perspectives for the near future. The discussed data bring optimism for the future of oncologic care through the hope of refined utilization of adjuvant therapies with higher efficacy and safety for patients with both localized and advanced CRC.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Rectal Neoplasms , Humans , Neoplasm, Residual/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Combined Modality Therapy , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
In 2013, recognizing that Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of death by cancer worldwide and that it was a neglected disease increasing rapidly in Mexico, the community of researchers at the Biomedicine Research Unit of the Facultad de Estudios Superiores Iztacala from the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) established an intramural consortium that involves a multidisciplinary group of researchers, technicians, and postgraduate students to contribute to the understanding of this pathology in Mexico. This article is about the work developed by the Mexican Colorectal Cancer Research Consortium (MEX-CCRC): how the Consortium was created, its members, and its short- and long-term goals. Moreover, it is a narrative of the accomplishments of this project. Finally, we reflect on possible strategies against CRC in Mexico and contrast all the data presented with another international strategy to prevent and treat CRC. We believe that the Consortium's characteristics must be maintained to initiate a national strategy, and the reported data could be useful to establish future collaborations with other countries in Latin America and the world.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Students , Humans , Mexico , Interdisciplinary Studies , Therapies, Investigational , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
Oligometastatic disease (OMD) defines a status of cancer that is intermediate between localized and widely spread metastatic disease, and can be treated with curative intent. While imaging diagnostic tools have considerably improved in recent years, unidentified micrometastases can still escape from current detection techniques allowing disease to progress. The variety of OMD scenarios are mainly defined by the number of metastases, the biological and molecular tumour profiles, and the timing of the development of metastases. Increasing knowledge has contributed to the earlier and improved detection of OMD, underlining the importance of an early disease control. Based on increasing detection rates of OMD in the current real clinical practice and the lack of standardized evidence-based guidelines to treat this cancer status, a board of experts from the Spanish Societies of Radiation Oncology (SEOR) and Medical Oncology (SEOM) organized a series of sessions to update the current state-of-the-art on OMD from a multidisciplinary perspective, and to discuss how results from clinical studies may translate into promising treatment options. This experts' review series summarizes what is known and what it is pending clarification in the context of OMD in the scenarios of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Breast Cancer (Part I), and Prostate Cancer and Colorectal Cancer (Part II), aiming to offer specialists a pragmatic framework that might contribute to the improved management of patients.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Colorectal Neoplasms , Lung Neoplasms , Prostatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Male , Humans , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Medical Oncology , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiosurgery/methodsABSTRACT
Cancer is frequently caused by microRNAs, which control post-transcriptional levels of gene expression by binding to target mRNAs. MiR-29a-3p has recently been shown to play a twofold function in the majority of malignancies, including colorectal cancer (CRC), according to mounting evidence. Here, we not only briefly summarize such connection between miR-29a-3p and cancers, but aslo primarily evaluate the miR-29a-3p expression pattern, clinical applicability, and molecular mechanisms in CRC to provide a guide for future studies. This review established the diagnostic and prognostic value of miR-29a-3p abnormalty in a variety of clinical samples for CRC. Furthermore, current molecular mechanisms of miR-29a-3p for regulating cancerous biological processes such growth, invasion, metastasis, the epithelial-mesenchymal transformation process, and immunomodulation through its upstream regulatory factors and downstream targeted genes were briefly explored. More specifically, miR-29a-3p has been linked to a few medications that have been shown to have anticancer benefits. To sum up, miR-29a-3p is a promising biomarker and prospective therapeutic target for the diagnosis and prognosis of CRC, but further research is still needed to establish a theoretical basis for more practical applications.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , MicroRNAs , Humans , Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic , MicroRNAs/genetics , MicroRNAs/metabolism , Prognosis , Biomarkers , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Cell Proliferation/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: For clinically low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, the decision on cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is disputed. The present study investigates the use of additional biomarkers of ploidy and stroma-ratio(PS) to stratify patients with low-risk stage III colorectal cancer, providing a basis for individualized treatment in the future. METHODS: This study retrospectively enrolled 198 patients with clinical-low-risk stage III colorectal cancer (T1-3N1M0) and analyzed the DNA ploidy and stroma ratio of FFPE tumor tissues. The patients were divided into PS-low-risk group (Diploidy or Low-stroma) and PS-high-risk group (Non-diploid and High-stroma). For survival analyses, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models were used. RESULTS: The results showed that the 5-year DFS of the PS-high-risk group was significantly lower than that in the PS-low-risk group (78.6 vs. 91.2%, HR = 2.606 [95% CI: 1.011-6.717], P = 0.039). Besides, in the PS-low-risk group, the 5 year OS (98.2 vs. 86.7%, P = 0.022; HR = 5.762 [95% CI: 1.281-25.920]) and DFS (95.6, vs 79.9%, P = 0.019; HR = 3.7 [95% CI: 1.24-11.04]) of patients received adjuvant chemotherapy for > 3 months were significantly higher than those received adjuvant chemotherapy for < 3 months. We also found that the PS could stratify the prognosis of patients with dMMR tumors. The 5-year OS (96.3 vs 71.4%, P = 0.037) and DFS (92.6 vs 57.1%, P = 0.015) were higher in the PS-low-risk dMMR patients than those in the PS-high-risk dMMR patients. CONCLUSION: In this study, we found that PS can predict the prognosis of patients with stage III low-risk CRC. Besides, it may guide the decision on postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Neoplasm Staging , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Prognosis , Ploidies , DNA/therapeutic use , Chemotherapy, AdjuvantABSTRACT
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent cancer worldwide. Although improvements in detection and treatment have been implemented; CRC incidence, prevalence, and mortality remain high, even in developed countries. The risk of developing this cancer is related to poor eating habits, smoking, inflammatory bowel disease, polyps, genetic factors, and aging. There are several methods for detecting colorectal cancer, including the guaiac test, stool immunochemical test, stool DNA test, sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and barium enema. The stage at which the cancer is detected determines the patient's prognosis, survival, and treatment. Treatments include endoscopic and surgical local excision, preoperative radiation therapy and systemic downstage therapy, extensive surgery for locoregional and metastatic disease, local ablative therapies for metastases, and palliative, targeted chemotherapy and immunotherapy.
El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) es el tercer cáncer más prevalente a nivel mundial. A pesar de que se han implementado mejoras en la detección y el tratamiento; la incidencia, la prevalencia y la mortalidad del CCR siguen siendo altas, incluso en países desarrollados. El riesgo de desarrollar este cáncer está relacionado con malos hábitos alimentarios, tabaquismo, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, pólipos, factores genéticos y envejecimiento. Existen varios métodos para detectar el cáncer colorrectal, como la prueba de guayaco, la prueba inmunoquímica de heces, la prueba de ADN en heces, la sigmoidoscopia, la colonoscopia y el enema de bario. El estadio en el que se detecta el cáncer determina el pronóstico, la supervivencia y el tratamiento del paciente. Los tratamientos incluyen escisión local endoscópica y quirúrgica, radioterapia preoperatoria y terapia sistémica de reducción del estadio, cirugía extensa para enfermedad locorregional y metastásica, terapias ablativas locales para metástasis y quimioterapia paliativa, terapia dirigida e inmunoterapia.
Subject(s)
Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/classification , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Background: The surgery with total mesorectal excision recommended by R. J. Heald in 1982 is the gold standard. Rectal cancer (RC) surgery has a morbidity rate ranging from 6 to 35%, and it can cause functional issues such as sexual, urinary, and bowel dysfunction in the long term. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has been gaining ground in patients with lesions in the middle and lower rectum. The aim of the present study is to present the experience of a reference service in the treatment of RC. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study involving 53 patients diagnosed with RC between January 2017 and December 2019 with follow-up until December 2020. We examined tumor location, disease stage, digital rectal exam findings, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), therapeutic modality offered, and follow-up time. Results: A total of 32% of the patients were men and 68% were women, with a mean age of 60 years old. Location: upper rectum in 6 cases, middle rectum in 21 cases, and lower rectum in 26 cases with evolution from 9.8 to 13.5 months. The most frequent complaints were hematochezia and constipation. A total of 36 patients underwent neoadjuvant therapy: 11 complete clinical response (CCR) (30.5%), 20 (55.5%) partial clinical response (PCR), and no response in 5 patients (14%). The follow-up ranged from 12 to 48 months, with a mean of 30.5 months. A total of 25% of the patients had RC that went beyond the mesorectal fascia, and 22.64% had metastases in other parts of the body when they were diagnosed. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant radio and chemotherapy present themselves as an alternative in the treatment of rectal cancer. In 36 patients, 30.5% had a complete clinical response, 55.5% had a partial clinical response, and 14% had no response. It was worth doing the "Watch and Wait" (W&W) to sample. A definitive colostomy was avoided. However, it is necessary to expand the study to a larger follow-up and more patients. Additionally, it is necessary to implement a multicenter study. (AU)
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Rectum/surgery , Carcinoembryonic Antigen , Follow-Up Studies , Colon/surgery , Digital Rectal Examination , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
Background: Patients with colorectal cancer may seek the emergency department for symptoms related to chemotherapy and radiotherapy side effects as well as those from the disease itself and from surgery complications. Objectives: To establish the epidemiological and clinical profile of colorectal cancer patients that look for consultations in the emergency department. Methods: Retrospective study of emergency room charts from colorectal cancer patients that consulted in a single oncological hospital for the period of 1 year. Results: Four hundred and forty-six consultations were identified (49.5% males and 50.5% females) with a mean age of 63 years and with advanced disease (most with tumor, node, metastases [TNM] stages III and IV). The most common complaint was abdominal pain (27.5%), followed by nausea (4.7%; more commonly seen in females with p =0.03) and bladder symptoms (4.7%; more commonly seen in males, with p =0.003). Infections (10.3%) and acute abdominal pain (9.1%) were the most frequent diagnoses. About 18% of them were admitted to the hospital and 80% were discharged home. Conclusion: The profile of patients with colorectal cancer seeking the emergency department comprises patients with advanced disease and a similar proportion of males and females. Symptom-driven complaints were the most frequent reason for consultations. (AU)