Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 390
Filter
1.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(37): e27218, 2021 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34664858

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mild neurocognitive disorder (MND) is an intermediate state that can progress to dementia, and the cognitive reserve of MND is an important task in preventing dementia. Acupuncture and neurofeedback (NF) training have been used to improve cognitive function and treat MND or dementia, but their effectiveness remains controversial. In this trial, we will evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined NF-acupuncture treatment in comparison with single acupuncture treatment. METHODS AND DESIGN: This study is a randomized, assessor-blind, pilot trial. It is designed in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Interventions in Controlled Trials of Acupuncture. A total of 44 MND participants who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be enrolled, and each will be randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups of 22 subjects. Each subject will visit 24 times over 12 weeks and receive either acupuncture or NF-acupuncture combined treatment. At visit 25 (week 13), a follow-up evaluation will be performed, and then the investigator will analyze the results. The primary outcome is defined by the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment score from screening to visit 25. The secondary outcome includes the following: change in Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive, the Korean version of the Beck Depression Inventory, Body Awareness Questionnaire, delayed matching to sample task scores, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy values, from visit 1 to visit 25; heart rate variability values from visit 1 to visit 5, visit 9, visit 13, visit 21, visit 25; breath per minute values from visit 1 to visit 1 to 25. DISCUSSION: We will evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combined NF-acupuncture therapy, and expect that it will serve as the basis for the use of NF together with acupuncture in the clinical setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: KCT0004972 (registered in Clinical Research Information Service of the Republic of Korea, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/detailSearch.do/16239).


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Cognition/drug effects , Cognitive Dysfunction/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Neurofeedback/methods , Acupuncture Therapy/standards , Acupuncture Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Cognitive Dysfunction/physiopathology , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Republic of Korea
2.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1114-1121, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495686

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Priapism is a persistent penile erection that continues hours beyond, or is unrelated to, sexual stimulation and results in a prolonged and uncontrolled erection. Given its time-dependent and progressive nature, priapism is a situation that both urologists and emergency medicine practitioners must be familiar with and comfortable managing. Acute ischemic priapism, characterized by little or no cavernous blood flow and abnormal cavernous blood gases (ie, hypoxic, hypercarbic, acidotic) represents a medical emergency and may lead to cavernosal fibrosis and subsequent erectile dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature was performed by Emergency Care Research Institute for articles published between January 1, 1960 and May 1, 2020. Searches identified 2948 potentially relevant articles, and 2516 of these were excluded at the title or abstract level for not meeting inclusion criteria for any key question. Full texts for the remaining 432 articles were reviewed, and ultimately 137 unique articles were included in the report. RESULTS: This Guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper diagnosis and surgical and non-surgical treatment of patients with acute ischemic priapism. This Guideline addresses the role of imaging, adjunctive laboratory testing, early involvement of urologists when presenting to the emergency room, discussion of conservative therapies, enhanced data for patient counseling on risks of erectile dysfunction and surgical complications, specific recommendations on intracavernosal phenylephrine with or without irrigation, the inclusion of novel surgical techniques (eg, tunneling), and early penile prosthesis placement. CONCLUSIONS: All patients with priapism should be evaluated emergently to identify the sub-type of priapism (acute ischemic versus non-ischemic) and those with an acute ischemic event should be provided early intervention. Treatment of the acute ischemic patient must be based on patient objectives, available resources, and clinician experience. As such, a single pathway for managing the condition is oversimplified and no longer appropriate. Using a diversified approach, some men may be treated with intracavernosal injections of phenylephrine alone, others with aspiration/irrigation or distal shunting, and some may undergo non-emergent placement of a penile prosthesis.


Subject(s)
Emergency Treatment/standards , Erectile Dysfunction/prevention & control , Ischemia/therapy , Priapism/therapy , Urology/standards , Acute Disease/therapy , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Emergency Treatment/methods , Erectile Dysfunction/etiology , Erectile Dysfunction/physiopathology , Humans , Ischemia/etiology , Ischemia/physiopathology , Male , North America , Penile Erection/physiology , Penis/diagnostic imaging , Penis/drug effects , Penis/physiopathology , Penis/surgery , Phenylephrine/administration & dosage , Priapism/diagnosis , Priapism/etiology , Priapism/physiopathology , Societies, Medical/standards , Time Factors , Ultrasonography, Doppler , Urology/methods
3.
J Urol ; 206(5): 1106-1113, 2021 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34495688

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The clinician treating patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) needs to balance a variety of factors when making treatment decisions. In addition to the patient's urologic symptoms and urodynamic findings, other issues that may influence management options of the lower urinary tract include cognition, hand function, type of neurologic disease, mobility, bowel function/management, and social and caregiver support. This Guideline allows the clinician to understand the options available to treat patients, understand the findings that can be seen in NLUTD, and appreciate which options are best for each individual patient. This allows for decisions to be made with the patient, in a shared decision-making manner, such that the patient's quality of life can be optimized with respect to their bladder management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive search for studies assessing patients undergoing evaluation, surveillance, management, or follow-up for NLUTD was conducted from January 2001 through October 2017 and was rerun in February 2021 to capture newer literature. The primary search returned 20,496 unique citations. Following a title and abstract screen, full texts were obtained for 3,036 studies. During full-text review, studies were primarily excluded for not meeting the PICO criteria. One hundred eight-four primary literature studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the evidence base. RESULTS: This guideline was developed to inform clinicians on the proper evaluation, diagnosis, and risk stratification of adult patients with NLUTD and the non-surgical and surgical treatment options available. Additional statements on urinary tract infection and autonomic dysreflexia were developed to guide the clinician. CONCLUSIONS: NLUTD patients may undergo non-surgical and surgical treatment options depending on their level of risk, symptoms, and urodynamic findings. Appropriate follow-up, primarily based on their risk stratification, must be maintained after treatment.


Subject(s)
Aftercare/standards , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/therapy , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/therapy , Urology/standards , Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists/therapeutic use , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Decision Making, Shared , Exercise Therapy/methods , Exercise Therapy/standards , Humans , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization/methods , Intermittent Urethral Catheterization/standards , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/diagnosis , Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/etiology , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standards , Societies, Medical/standards , United States , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/complications , Urinary Bladder, Neurogenic/diagnosis , Urodynamics , Urologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Urologic Surgical Procedures/standards , Urology/methods
4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2115312, 2021 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34196715

ABSTRACT

Importance: The optimal management strategy for high-risk prostate cancer and additional adverse clinicopathologic features remains unknown. Objective: To compare clinical outcomes among patients with high-risk prostate cancer after definitive treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included patients with high-risk prostate cancer (as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network [NCCN]) and at least 1 adverse clinicopathologic feature (defined as any primary Gleason pattern 5 on biopsy, clinical T3b-4 disease, ≥50% cores with biopsy results positive for prostate cancer, or NCCN ≥2 high-risk features) treated between 2000 and 2014 at 16 tertiary centers. Data were analyzed in November 2020. Exposures: Radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or EBRT plus brachytherapy boost (BT) with ADT. Guideline-concordant multimodal treatment was defined as RP with appropriate use of multimodal therapy (optimal RP), EBRT with at least 2 years of ADT (optimal EBRT), or EBRT with BT with at least 1 year ADT (optimal EBRT with BT). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was prostate cancer-specific mortality; distant metastasis was a secondary outcome. Differences were evaluated using inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Fine-Gray competing risk regression models. Results: A total of 6004 men (median [interquartile range] age, 66.4 [60.9-71.8] years) with high-risk prostate cancer were analyzed, including 3175 patients (52.9%) who underwent RP, 1830 patients (30.5%) who underwent EBRT alone, and 999 patients (16.6%) who underwent EBRT with BT. Compared with RP, treatment with EBRT with BT (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR] 0.78, [95% CI, 0.63-0.97]; P = .03) or with EBRT alone (sHR, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.53-0.92]; P = .01) was associated with significantly improved prostate cancer-specific mortality; there was no difference in prostate cancer-specific mortality between EBRT with BT and EBRT alone (sHR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.67-1.18]; P = .43). No significant differences in prostate cancer-specific mortality were found across treatment cohorts among 2940 patients who received guideline-concordant multimodality treatment (eg, optimal EBRT alone vs optimal RP: sHR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.52-1.09]; P = .14). However, treatment with EBRT alone or EBRT with BT was consistently associated with lower rates of distant metastasis compared with treatment with RP (eg, EBRT vs RP: sHR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.44-0.58]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that among patients with high-risk prostate cancer and additional unfavorable clinicopathologic features receiving guideline-concordant multimodal therapy, prostate cancer-specific mortality outcomes were equivalent among those treated with RP, EBRT, and EBRT with BT, although distant metastasis outcomes were more favorable among patients treated with EBRT and EBRT with BT. Optimal multimodality treatment is critical for improving outcomes in patients with high-risk prostate cancer.


Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiotherapy/standards , Aged , California/epidemiology , Cohort Studies , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prostatectomy/methods , Prostatectomy/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/complications , Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality , Radiotherapy/methods , Radiotherapy/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
5.
BMJ ; 374: n1648, 2021 07 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34312178

ABSTRACT

Since its emergence in Wuhan, China, covid-19 has spread and had a profound effect on the lives and health of people around the globe. As of 4 July 2021, more than 183 million confirmed cases of covid-19 had been recorded worldwide, and 3.97 million deaths. Recent evidence has shown that a range of persistent symptoms can remain long after the acute SARS-CoV-2 infection, and this condition is now coined long covid by recognized research institutes. Studies have shown that long covid can affect the whole spectrum of people with covid-19, from those with very mild acute disease to the most severe forms. Like acute covid-19, long covid can involve multiple organs and can affect many systems including, but not limited to, the respiratory, cardiovascular, neurological, gastrointestinal, and musculoskeletal systems. The symptoms of long covid include fatigue, dyspnea, cardiac abnormalities, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder, muscle pain, concentration problems, and headache. This review summarizes studies of the long term effects of covid-19 in hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients and describes the persistent symptoms they endure. Risk factors for acute covid-19 and long covid and possible therapeutic options are also discussed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/etiology , COVID-19/therapy , Clinical Trials as Topic , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Drug Repositioning , Global Burden of Disease , Humans , Incidence , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 100(23): e26225, 2021 Jun 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34115008

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer (LC) is the malignant tumor with the highest incidence in the world, and treatment methods include surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy. Cancer pain is a common symptom in patients with LC, and the clinical treatment is to relieve it with analgesics. Acupuncture can relieve cancer pain. This study aims to systematically study the efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with analgesics on cancer pain in patients with LC. METHODS: From the beginning to April 2021, search Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Controlled Trials Register (Central), China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Database, China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), and Chinese Science Journal Database (VIP database). Search the international clinical trial registration platform and the Chinese clinical trial registration platform to find ongoing or unpublished trials. The main outcome indicator is the total effective rate of analgesia, and the secondary outcome indicator is pain intensity score and adverse reactions. The RevMan 5.4 software will be used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: This study will provide the latest evidence for acupuncture combined with analgesics to relieve LC pain. CONCLUSION: The conclusion of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture combined with analgesics in alleviating LC pain. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: INPLASY202150051.


Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/standards , Analgesics/standards , Cancer Pain/therapy , Clinical Protocols , Pain Management/standards , Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Analgesics/therapeutic use , Cancer Pain/drug therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/complications , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Patient Safety/standards , Treatment Outcome
7.
Am J Clin Dermatol ; 22(4): 523-540, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34008162

ABSTRACT

Viral venereal diseases remain difficult to treat. Human papilloma virus (HPV) and herpes simplex virus (HSV) are two common viral venereal diseases. HPV infections are characterized by anogenital warts and less commonly by premalignant or malignant lesions. HSV infections classically present as grouped vesicles on an erythematous base with associated burning or pain; however, immunosuppressed patients may have atypical presentations with nodular or ulcerative lesions. This review discusses the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of anogenital HPV and HSV infections with an emphasis on treatment modalities for the practicing dermatologist. Diagnosis of these diseases typically relies on clinical assessment, although multiple diagnostic techniques can be utilized and are recommended when diagnosis is uncertain or evaluating an individual with increased risk of malignancy. Management of HPV and HSV infections involves appropriate counseling, screening, and multiple treatment techniques. Particularly for HPV infections, a practitioner may need to use a combination of techniques to achieve the desired outcome.


Subject(s)
Herpesviridae Infections/diagnosis , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/diagnosis , Skin Diseases, Viral/diagnosis , Alphapapillomavirus/isolation & purification , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Counseling/standards , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Herpesviridae/isolation & purification , Herpesviridae Infections/epidemiology , Herpesviridae Infections/therapy , Herpesviridae Infections/transmission , Humans , Mass Screening/standards , Papillomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Papillomavirus Infections/therapy , Papillomavirus Infections/transmission , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/epidemiology , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/therapy , Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral/transmission , Skin/pathology , Skin/virology , Skin Diseases, Viral/epidemiology , Skin Diseases, Viral/therapy , Skin Diseases, Viral/transmission
8.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 20(4): 384-392, 2021 Apr 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33852244

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rosacea, an inflammatory skin disease that leads to an impaired skin barrier function commonly involves the face. Symptoms of rosacea can be bothersome and include pain, stinging, burning, itching, and facial flushing. This review explored skin barrier impairment in rosacea and reduced symptomatology when using over the counter (OTC) skincare products. METHODS: Nine dermatologists (the panel) completed a survey on OTC products they recommend for rosacea. The survey results were summarized, presented, and discussed during the online meeting, together with the results of a literature review. The outcome of these discussions, coupled with the panel's expert opinion and experience, is shown in the current review. RESULTS: Addressing barrier dysfunction by use of moisturizer and cleanser formulations that restore skin hydration, normalize skin pH, restore the microbiome, and skin lipids can assist in improving rosacea signs and symptoms. The panel's consensus was that in addition to the use of prescription medications, skincare recommendations are a crucial part of successful rosacea therapy. In addition to occlusives and humectants, barrier restoring ingredients such as ceramides, hyaluronic acid, and niacinamide were considered beneficial. Equally important was the absence of potentially irritating substances. CONCLUSIONS: The use of OTC products can improve rosacea symptomatology and signs. As adjuncts, these products are recommended before and during prescription therapy and as part of a maintenance regimen. J Drugs Dermatol. 20(4):384-392. doi:10.36849/JDD.5861 THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL fTEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.


Subject(s)
Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Nonprescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Prescription Drugs/administration & dosage , Rosacea/therapy , Skin Care/methods , Administration, Cutaneous , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Consensus , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Humans , Microbiota/drug effects , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rosacea/microbiology , Rosacea/pathology , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/drug effects , Skin/microbiology , Skin/pathology , Skin Care/standards , Treatment Outcome , Water Loss, Insensible/drug effects
9.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 49(2): 133-154, mar. 2021. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-214252

ABSTRACT

The current systematic review presented and discussed the most recent studies on pediatric chronic cough. In addition, the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology elaborated a comprehensive algorithm to guide the primary care approach to a pediatric patient with chronic cough. Several algorithms on chronic cough management have been adopted and validated in clinical practice; however, unlike the latter, we developed an algorithm focused on pediatric age, from birth until adulthood. Based on our findings, children and adolescents with chronic cough without cough pointers can be safely managed, initially using the watchful waiting approach and, successively, starting empirical treatment based on cough characteristics. Unlike other algorithms that suggest laboratory and instrumental investigations as a first step, this review highlighted the importance of a “wait and see” approach, consisting of parental reassurance and close clinical observation, also due to inter-professional collaboration and communication between general practitioners and specialists that guarantee better patient management, appropriate prescription behavior, and improved patient outcome. Moreover, the neonatal screening program provided by the Italian National Health System, which intercepts several diseases precociously, allowing to treat them in a very early stage, helps and supports a “wait and see” approach. Conversely, in the presence of cough pointers or persistence of cough, the patient should be tested and treated by the specialist. Further investigations and treatments will be based on cough etiology, aiming to intercept the underlying disease, prevent potentially irreversible tissue damage, and improve the general health of patients affected by chronic cough, as well as the quality of life of patients and their family. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this algorithm’s performance in real clinical practice (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Allergy and Immunology/standards , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Cough/diagnosis , Cough/therapy , Quality of Life , Chronic Disease , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Societies, Medical , Italy
10.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 49(2): 133-154, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33641305

ABSTRACT

The current systematic review presented and discussed the most recent studies on pediatric chronic cough. In addition, the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology elaborated a comprehensive algorithm to guide the primary care approach to a pediatric patient with chronic cough.Several algorithms on chronic cough management have been adopted and validated in clinical practice; however, unlike the latter, we developed an algorithm focused on pediatric age, from birth until adulthood. Based on our findings, children and adolescents with chronic cough without cough pointers can be safely managed, initially using the watchful waiting approach and, successively, starting empirical treatment based on cough characteristics. Unlike other algorithms that suggest laboratory and instrumental investigations as a first step, this review highlighted the importance of a "wait and see" approach, consisting of parental reassurance and close clinical observation, also due to inter-professional collaboration and communication between general practitioners and specialists that guarantee better patient management, appropriate prescription behavior, and improved patient outcome. Moreover, the neonatal screening program provided by the Italian National Health System, which intercepts several diseases precociously, allowing to treat them in a very early stage, helps and supports a "wait and see" approach.Conversely, in the presence of cough pointers or persistence of cough, the patient should be tested and treated by the specialist. Further investigations and treatments will be based on cough etiology, aiming to intercept the underlying disease, prevent potentially irreversible tissue damage, and improve the general health of patients affected by chronic cough, as well as the quality of life of patients and their family.


Subject(s)
Allergy and Immunology/standards , Cough/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Life , Antitussive Agents/therapeutic use , Child , Chronic Disease/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Cough/complications , Cough/diagnosis , Cough/immunology , Humans , Italy , Societies, Medical/standards , Watchful Waiting/standards
11.
BJU Int ; 128(2): 225-235, 2021 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33450116

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To understand the barriers and facilitators to single instillation of intravesical chemotherapy (SI-IVC) use after resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) in Scotland and England using a behavioural theory-informed approach. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional descriptive study of practices at seven hospitals, we investigated care pathways, policies, and interviewed 30 urology staff responsible for SI-IVC. We used the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to organise our investigation and conducted deductive thematic analyses, while inductively coding emergent beliefs. RESULTS: Barriers to SI-IVC were present at different organisational levels and professional roles. In four hospitals, there was a policy to not instil SI-IVC in theatre. Six hospitals' staff reported delays in mitomycin C (MMC) ordering and/or local storage. Lack of training, skills and perceived workload affected motivation. Facilitators included access to modern instilling devices (four hospitals) and incorporating reminders in operation proforma (four hospitals). Performance targets (with audit and feedback) within a national governance framework were present in Scotland but not England. Differences in coordinated leadership, sharing best practices, and disliking being perceived as underperforming, were evident in Scotland. CONCLUSIONS: High-certainty evidence shows that SI-IVC, such as MMC, after NMIBC resection reduces recurrences. This evidence underpins international guidance. The number of eligible patients receiving SI-IVC is variable indicating suboptimal practice. Improving SI-IVC adherence requires modifications to theatre instilling policies, delivery and storage of MMC, staff training, and documentation. Centralising care, with bladder cancer expert leadership and best practices sharing with performance targets, likely led to improvements in Scotland. National quality improvement, incorporating audit and feedback, with additional implementation strategies targeted to professional role could improve adherence and patient outcomes elsewhere. This process should be controlled to clarify implementation intervention effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Guideline Adherence/statistics & numerical data , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/drug therapy , Administration, Intravesical , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Cross-Sectional Studies , England , Humans , Neoplasm Invasiveness , Postoperative Period , Scotland , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/pathology , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/surgery
12.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 20(1): 6-12, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33349607

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system has been endorsed by international guidelines as a staging algorithm of hepatocellular carcinoma. This analysis was performed to assess the outcome of liver transplantation in patients treated against the BCLC recommendations. METHODS: The data of 198 patients who underwent liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma were extracted from a prospectively maintained database to classify the patients according to the BCLC system. RESULTS: BCLC staging was as follows: 0, n = 5; A, n = 77; B, n = 41; C, n = 53; and D, n = 22. Accordingly, liver transplantation was performed in the majority of patients against BCLC recommendations. Surgery (n = 16), radiofrequency ablation (n = 15) and transarterial chemoembolization (n = 151) preceded liver transplantation in 182 patients. Sixteen patients were transplanted without pretreatment. The1-, 5- and 10-year survival rates were 83.8%, 62.4% and 45.9%, and 1-, 5-, and 10-year recurrence rates were 7.7%, 22.7% and 26.7%. The BCLC classification did neither impact survival (P = 0.796) nor recurrence (P = 0.693). In the Cox analysis, RECIST tumor progression and initial alpha fetoprotein were independent predictors of outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the oncological nor the functional stratification imposed by the BCLC system was of importance for outcome. Lack of flexibility and disregard of biological parameters hamper its clinical applicability in liver transplantation.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/classification , Disease Management , Guideline Adherence , Liver Neoplasms/classification , Liver Transplantation/standards , Neoplasm Staging/classification , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/diagnosis , Liver Neoplasms/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies
14.
J Am Acad Dermatol ; 84(2): 432-470, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32738429

ABSTRACT

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory, multisystem disease that affects up to 3.2% of the United States population. This guideline addresses important clinical questions that arise in psoriasis management and care and provides recommendations based on the available evidence. The treatment of psoriasis with topical agents and with alternative medicine will be reviewed, emphasizing treatment recommendations and the role of dermatologists in monitoring and educating patients regarding benefits as well as risks that may be associated. This guideline will also address the severity assessment methods of psoriasis in adults.


Subject(s)
Complementary Therapies/methods , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Psoriasis/therapy , Academies and Institutes/standards , Administration, Cutaneous , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Complementary Therapies/standards , Dermatology/standards , Evidence-Based Medicine/methods , Evidence-Based Medicine/standards , Foundations/standards , Humans , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Psoriasis/diagnosis , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , United States
16.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(10): 929-934, 2020 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026776

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic skin condition characterized by primary and secondary manifestations affecting the centrofacial skin. The primary diagnostic phenotypes for rosacea are fixed centrofacial erythema with periodic intensification, and phymatous changes. Major phenotypes, including papules and pustules, flushing, telangiectasia, and ocular manifestations, may occur concomitantly or independently with the diagnostic features. The phenotypes of rosacea patients may evolve between subtypes and may require multiple treatments concurrently to be effectively managed. We report the proceedings of a roundtable discussion among 3 dermatologists experienced in the treatment of rosacea and present examples of rosacea treatment strategies that target multiple rosacea symptoms presenting in individual patients. METHODS: Three hypothetical cases describing patients representative of those commonly seen by practicing dermatologists were developed. A roundtable discussion was held to discuss overall and specific strategies for treating rosacea based on the cases. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: With few exceptions, the dermatologists recommended combination therapy targeting each manifestation of rosacea for each case. These recommendations are in agreement with the current American Acne and Rosacea Society treatment guidelines for rosacea and are supported by several studies demonstrating beneficial results from combining rosacea treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Rosacea is an evolving condition; care should take into account all clinical signs and symptoms of rosacea that are present in an individual patient, understanding that symptoms may change over time, and utilize combination therapy when applicable to target all rosacea symptoms. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10): 929-934. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5367.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic alpha-Agonists/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Dermatology/methods , Laser Therapy/methods , Rosacea/therapy , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Aftercare/methods , Aftercare/standards , Color , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Dermatology/standards , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Female , Humans , Ivermectin/administration & dosage , Laser Therapy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Rosacea/diagnosis , Rosacea/ethnology , Rosacea/immunology , Skin/drug effects , Skin/immunology , Skin Pigmentation , Societies, Medical/standards , Treatment Outcome , United States
17.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(10): 935-940, 2020 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026777

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition characterized by disturbed barrier function, skin inflammation, and cutaneous dysbiosis. Clinically, it manifests as chronic-recurrent xerosis, pruritus, and erythematous lesions. Its pathophysiology is complex, making the selection of appropriate treatment options a task. AIM: To share insights gained from a literature review and discussions with experts in dermatology on key factors related to the prevention, treatment, and management of AD in relation to the skin microbiome. METHODS: Results from an expert panel were summarized and discussed to provide updated recommendations for the treatment and maintenance of AD. RESULTS: Evidence supports a strategy for managing inflammatory skin diseases with a selenium-rich post-biotic thermal water and biomass containing moisturizer. The moisturizer helps to restore homeostasis of the skin, re-populate a diverse microbiome, encourage the growth of commensal bacteria, and improve barrier function and symptoms of AD. CONCLUSIONS: Normalization of skin microbiome diversity using a topical moisturizer containing post-biotic aqua and biomass may offer a valuable option for the treatment and maintenance of inflammatory skin diseases. Clinicians should discuss the benefits of this treatment in the context of a full AD management program that covers prevention, active treatment, and maintenance. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10):935-940. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5393.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/therapy , Dermatologic Agents/administration & dosage , Hydrotherapy/methods , Microbiota/immunology , Skin/microbiology , Administration, Cutaneous , Adult , Child, Preschool , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Dermatitis, Atopic/complications , Dermatitis, Atopic/immunology , Dermatitis, Atopic/microbiology , Dermatology/methods , Dermatology/standards , Drug Therapy, Combination/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination/standards , Humans , Infant , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prebiotics/administration & dosage , Probiotics/administration & dosage , Severity of Illness Index , Skin/drug effects , Skin/immunology , Symbiosis/immunology , Treatment Outcome , Water Loss, Insensible/drug effects , Water Loss, Insensible/immunology
18.
J Fam Pract ; 69(7): 344-352, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32936843

ABSTRACT

Manage uncomplicated cases following guidelines on medical therapy and with adjunctive psychotherapy. Refer complicated and severe cases to Psychiatry.


Subject(s)
Antimanic Agents/standards , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Primary Health Care/standards , Psychotherapy/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
19.
J Surg Res ; 256: 564-569, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805578

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgery for anorectal disease is thought to cause significant postoperative pain. Our previous work demonstrated that most opioids prescribed after anorectal surgery are not used. We aimed to evaluate a standardized protocol for pain control after anorectal surgery. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated a standardized opioid reduction protocol over a 13-mo period for all patients undergoing elective anorectal surgery at our institution. Protocol components include preoperative query, procedural local-anesthetic blocks, first-line nonopioid analgesic use ± opioid prescription of five pills, and standardized postoperative instructions. Patients completed questionnaires at postoperative follow-up. Patients with history of opioid abuse or use within 30 d of operation, loss to follow-up, or surgical complications were excluded. Primary outcome was quality of pain control on a five-point scale. Secondary outcomes included use of nonopioid analgesics, opioids used, and need for refill. RESULTS: A total of 55 patients were included. Mean age was 47 ± 17 y with 23 women (42%). Anorectal abscess/fistula procedures were the most common (69%) followed by pilonidal procedures (11%) and hemorrhoidectomy (7%). Most had general anesthesia (60%) with the remainder local anesthesia ± sedation. Fifty-four (98%) had procedural local-anesthetic blocks. Twenty-six patients (47%) were prescribed opioids with a median of five pills. Forty-seven patients (85%) reported the use of nonopioid analgesics. Forty-six patients (84%) reported excellent to very good pain control. About 220 opioid pills were prescribed, and 122 were reported to be used. One patient (2%) received an opioid refill. CONCLUSIONS: Satisfactory pain control after anorectal surgery can be achieved with multimodality therapy with little to no opioid use for most patients.


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pain Management/standards , Pain, Postoperative/therapy , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Adult , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/administration & dosage , Anesthesia, General/standards , Anesthesia, General/statistics & numerical data , Anesthesia, Local/standards , Anesthesia, Local/statistics & numerical data , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Drug Prescriptions/statistics & numerical data , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nerve Block/standards , Nerve Block/statistics & numerical data , Pain Management/methods , Pain Management/statistics & numerical data , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
20.
JAMA Psychiatry ; 77(11): 1107-1115, 2020 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639561

ABSTRACT

Importance: Despite evidence of efficacious psychological and pharmacologic therapies for insomnia, there is little information about what first-line treatment should be and how best to proceed when initial treatment fails. Objective: To evaluate the comparative efficacy of 4 treatment sequences involving psychological and medication therapies for insomnia and examine the moderating effect of psychiatric disorders on insomnia outcomes. Design, Setting, and Participants: In a sequential multiple-assignment randomized trial, patients were assigned to first-stage therapy involving either behavioral therapy (BT; n = 104) or zolpidem (zolpidem; n = 107), and patients who did not remit received a second treatment involving either medication (zolpidem or trazodone) or psychological therapy (BT or cognitive therapy [CT]). The study took place at Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Québec, Université Laval, Québec City, Québec, Canada, and at National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado, and enrollment of patients took place from August 2012 through July 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end points were the treatment response and remission rates, defined by the Insomnia Severity Index total score. Results: Patients included 211 adults (132 women; mean [SD] age, 45.6 [14.9] years) with a chronic insomnia disorder, including 74 patients with a comorbid anxiety or mood disorder. First-stage therapy with BT or zolpidem produced equivalent weighted percentages of responders (BT, 45.5%; zolpidem, 49.7%; OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.60-2.33) and remitters (BT, 38.03%; zolpidem, 30.3%; OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 0.75-2.65). Second-stage therapy produced significant increases in responders for the 2 conditions, starting with BT (BT to zolpidem, 40.6% to 62.7%; OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.14-5.30; BT to CT, 50.1% to 68.2%; OR, 2.09; 95% CI, 1.01-4.35) but no significant change following zolpidem treatment. Significant increase in percentage of remitters was observed in 2 of 4 therapy sequences (BT to zolpidem, 38.1% to 55.9%; OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.04-4.11; zolpidem to trazodone, 31.4% to 49.4%; OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 0.91-5.00). Although response/remission rates were lower among patients with psychiatric comorbidity, treatment sequences that involved BT followed by CT or zolpidem followed by trazodone yielded better outcomes for patients with comorbid insomnia. Response and remission rates were well sustained through the 12-month follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: Behavioral therapy and zolpidem medication produced equivalent response and remission rates. Adding a second treatment produced an added value for those whose insomnia failed to remit with initial therapies. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01651442.


Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy/standards , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Adult , Colorado/epidemiology , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quebec/epidemiology , Single-Blind Method , Sleep Aids, Pharmaceutical/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome , Zolpidem/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...